Academic literature on the topic 'IPR infringemet'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'IPR infringemet.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "IPR infringemet"

1

Ong, Hway-Boon, Yih-Jian Yoong, and Bahma Sivasubramaniam. "Intellectual property rights (IPR) awareness among undergraduate students." Corporate Ownership and Control 10, no. 1 (2012): 711–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i1c7art7.

Full text
Abstract:
This study is conducted to examine the perception and awareness of intellectual property rights (IPR) among university students. A survey was conducted to illicit information about IPR from two private universities’ students in Malaysia. It was discovered that university students perceived plagiarism and piracy as infringement of IPR. Therefore, provision of adequate information, active participation of government bodies and university’s authorities, as well as IPR awareness activities are three factors that will encourage IPR awareness among these university students.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Sarkar, Suvrashis, and Dr Stephen D’Silva. "A Case Study on IPR Infringement from Indian Consumer Goods Sector." International Journal of Scientific Research 2, no. 10 (June 1, 2012): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/22778179/oct2013/76.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Islam, Mahbubl. "Legal Responses to IPR Infringement in Internet Sphere." Asian Journal of Humanity, Art and Literature 5, no. 1 (June 30, 2018): 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.18034/ajhal.v5i1.329.

Full text
Abstract:
The emergence of the Internet has changed the ways in which we create, distribute, access, and use information. The Internet provides manifold opportunities for users, operators, businesses, and the public at large for speedy, cheap, and global dissemination of information, knowledge, research, and entertainment. At the same time, it also poses complex conceptual and empirical challenges for intellectual property and related rights. Works of intellectual property can be digitized and transferred over the Internet. Many trademarks have been placed on it by the companies for advertising and marketing goods and services. In the field of copyright, a number of works of literature, film and art, and notably computer programs, have been transferred over the Internet. The patent system has also migrated onto the Internet. It is now popular for companies to patent their online business methods. In the Internet Sphere, the infringer can easily misdirect consumers to its website by using another’s trademark as a meta-tag, and it is also easy to copy and distribute other’s copyright materials unlawfully. Due to global nature of the Internet, an Internet IP infringement usually happens not only within one country but also across borders. All of these have raised many difficulties for the protection of IPRs in Internet sphere. Therefore everyone has been dubious of what the actual laws concerning Intellectual Property rights are in relation to Internet sphere. Today the Internet explosion has made the question of how to enforce IP law on a global scale as an imperative issue. In this Article, the author tries to accentuate the existing as well as changing IPR challenges brought about by the Internet and project what issues a national legislature should consider to meet the demands of the digital revolution. The core object of this study is to scrutinize the compelling factors behind the Intellectual Property Rights Infringements through the Internet and investigate the existing Legal Responses in International, Regional and Local levels. However, the findings demonstrate that mass-awareness, consensus and mutual co-operation among the developed and developing countries, proper enforcement of the existing laws as well as bringing amendments to some areas of Law can be cited as a potential solution.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

WANG, QINGFENG, and XU SUN. "EXPLORING CHINESE DESIGN BUSINESS OWNERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS." International Journal of Innovation Management 23, no. 06 (July 25, 2019): 1950059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919619500592.

Full text
Abstract:
As Intellectual Property (IP) protection can nurture innovation, and since innovation is one of the critical sources of economic growth, it has become especially important since China surpassed a certain economic development stage, because China now has a growing number of its own innovations which need to be protected. This paper describes the construction of a new research model with which to explore and examine the impact of potential factors on attitudes towards Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in China in the context of the creative design industry. The findings of a quantitative study of Chinese design business owners reveal the significant roles of Confucianism, perceived economic loss and perceived effectiveness of IPR law enforcement in shaping their attitudes towards IPR. Our findings support the idea that promoting Confucianism can help to develop an internalised respect for IPR, while sizable penalties for IPR infringement can enhance the effectiveness of IPR protection.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

D'Rosario, Michael. "Intellectual Property Regulation, and Software Piracy, a Predictive Model." International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences 7, no. 4 (October 2016): 21–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijsds.2016100102.

Full text
Abstract:
In recent years, a number of studies have considered the impact of IPRs on software piracy, specifically TRIPS and more recently U.S. USTR 301 reporting, pursuant to the Trade Act. The work of Shadlen (2005) supports the assertion that a number of recent IPR reforms directly influence rates of copyright infringement. Shadlen (2005) is a significant study into the impact of the IPRs such as TRIPS, Out of Cycle reviews and USTR 301 reporting on software piracy. The study identified a number of key IPR reforms and sought to determine the impact of IPR reform differentials on observed piracy rates. The current study extends upon Shadlen (2005), comparing the pooled panel model framework to an alternative model of prediction, a backward propagation, multilayer perceptron network model. The analysis conducted herein focuses specifically on ASEAN member countries. The study employs the Garson (1991) and Goh (1995) methods of independent variable analysis to offer further insight into relative importance of the IPR reform variables.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Schneider, M. "Measuring the scope and impact of IPR infringement in the EU." Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 7, no. 5 (April 9, 2012): 313–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jps054.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Romaniuk, U. V. "EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE IN PREVENTING IPR INFRINGEMENT IN E-COMMERCE: LESSONS FOR UKRAINE." Comparative-analytical law, no. 1 (2020): 186–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/2524-0390/2020.1.43.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Abbas, Asad, Anam Fatima, Kenneth Khavwandiza Sunguh, Anders Avdic, and Xuehe Zhang. "Digital Rights Management System in China." Journal of Cases on Information Technology 20, no. 1 (January 2018): 20–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2018010102.

Full text
Abstract:
In the era of technology, the Chinese government wants to adopt the latest technologies and interlink their processes to secure information of all stakeholders. Digital rights management (DRM) is one form of computerized system of copyright to protect access and stop infringement of digital contents for commercial purposes. For this article, the authors used a secondary literature review approach to first explore the development of intellectual property rights (IPR) in China and then they moved further to highlight the challenges and opportunities of DRM application and its use. The article concludes that China, as an emerging knowledge based economy, is trying to become a part of international laws and treaties. For this they should abide with international laws, treaties and also amend and enforce their own local laws, acts, rules and regulations based on IPR by adopting the latest technology such as DRM. Finally, the authors provided recommendations to offset the challenges together with existing opportunities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Juniotama Arifin, Alfredo, Ruth Elizabeth Marlamb Putri, and Tiara Patricia. "PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN PELANGGARAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL." Keadilan 19, no. 2 (September 27, 2021): 104–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.37090/keadilan.v19i2.484.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In running a business, every producer who has a work must be appreciated for his work. The form of appreciation can be done by registering his work to get intellectual property rights so that it can be protected by law. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are exclusive rights granted by a law or regulation to a person or group of people for their copyrighted works. In Indonesia IPR has not been implemented properly due to lack of socialization from the government and lack of concern from the community. This encourages the Indonesian government to be more concerned about copyright infringement. Along with the implementation process, it is undeniable that there are still many individuals who do not comply and use a work for commercial purposes. The research method used is the juridical-normative research method. For example, on January 13, 2020, Ruben Samuel Onsu sued I Am Geprek Bensu belonging to PT. Benny Sujono or abbreviated as I Am Geprek Bensu with a trademark abuse lawsuit. There is a need for government supervision of the use of other people's copyrighted works, good coordination between the government and the community so as to minimize the opportunity to commit fraud against a work. Based on the results of the study of cases that occurred, that victims of IPR violations are protected by law based on a first to file system. Keywords : Intellectual Property Rights, Legal Protection, Intellectual Property Rights Violation Victims
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Goel, Rajeev K. "IPR infringement in the United States: impacts on the input and output of R&D." Journal of Technology Transfer 45, no. 2 (October 30, 2018): 481–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9708-y.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "IPR infringemet"

1

Wang, Yinan. "Handling the U.S.-China Intellectual Property Rights Dispute – the Role of WTO’s Dispute Settlement System." Miami University / OhioLINK, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=miami1336224534.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Butr-Indr, Bhumindr. "La contrefaçon des droits de propriété intellectuelle : étude comparative en droits français et thaïlandais." Thesis, Paris 2, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA020031/document.

Full text
Abstract:
La contrefaçon est un phénomène de dimension internationale qui constitue aujourd’hui plus qu’hier un véritable fléau. Il apparaît que les principaux pays de provenance des contrefaçons saisies dans l’Union Européenne sont les pays d’Asie,notamment la Thaïlande. Cette recherche a pour but d'étudier les problèmes juridiques relatifs à la contrefaçon des droits de propriété intellectuelle. Ceci nous amène à poursuivre la recherche suivant deux axes. La première partie a pour but de mettre en évidence la comparaison de la définition de la contrefaçon en France et en Thaïlande. Elle se décompose en deux sous-parties, la première s'attachant à décrire la qualification de l’atteinte constitutive de contrefaçon selon les droits concernés (le terme « contrefaçon » en lui-même, tant en France qu’en Thaïlande, désignant différentes formes d’atteintes à un droit patrimonial de propriété intellectuelle). Pour identifier les atteintes constitutives de contrefaçon, notamment l’élément matériel, nous mettons l’accent sur 4 points: l’existence de la création, la diffusion de la création, l’usage de la création et la participation à l’action contrefaisante. S’agissant de l’élément intentionnel de contrefaçon, il semble présenter de multiples facettes. La seconde définit la preuve de la contrefaçon. On observe alors les moyens de preuve de la contrefaçon : la loi prévoit deux séries de mesures principales que nous pouvons regrouper en moyens de preuve en matière civile et pénale. Par ailleurs, il y a des moyens de preuve alternatifs entre les deux régimes. Ce sont des procédures douanières.La seconde partie a pour objet la prise en considération de la répression par les juridictions civiles et pénales. Elle se décompose donc en deux sous-parties : la première concerne les sanctions prononcées par les juridictions pénales. Nous avons déjà étudié la procédure pénale et les sanctions applicables à la contrefaçon. Il se trouve que la situation en Thaïlande est totalement différente de la situation française, notamment concernant la jurisprudence en matière pénale. Il semblerait que la majorité des décisions soient des sanctions prononcées par les juridictions pénales. La seconde sous-partie concerne quant à elle la réparation des atteintes à la propriété intellectuelle. Nous constatons que le préjudice subi, en France tout comme en Thaïlande constitue en un gain manqué . En outre l’évaluation du préjudice en France et en Thaïlande est difficile (préjudice subi en matière de marque, préjudice moral et fixation de l’indemnisation de peine privée)
Counterfeiting is an international problem. It appears that the main countries of origin of counterfeit goods seized in the European Union are the Asian countries, including Thailand. The research explains concisely the entire key factors to this whole problem. The research is divided into two parts; in the first place, I will outline pointly the definition of Intellectual Property Rights law (IPRs law) infringement between French and Thailand. Firstly, we focus on the structure of IPRs infringement. The term "counterfeit" in himself both in France and Thailand indicating different forms of an intellectual property rights liability conception. To identify violations constitute infringements, including the material element, we focus on four points, the existence of the creation, dissemination of the creation, use of creation, participation in the infringing action . With regard to the intentional element of infringement, iconcerned the intention of counterfeiter by the civil and criminal aspects as well as the objectives of my research would analysis on two components. First, the application of substantive issues embodies in the civil action. The second is the criminal action. The intention of counterfeiter are also intersect into two parts of action. The secondly,, we research to the proof of infringement. There provides two measures of proof in civil matters and evidence incriminal matters. In addition, there are a customs procedures as an alternative measure of proof . In the second place, we mainly concerned the IPRs law enforcement: Firstly we concerns the penalties imposed by criminal courts. We have already studied the criminal proceedings. In addition, we studied the penaltiesfor counterfeiting. We find that the criminal proceedings in Thailand is totally different from the criminal proceedings in France. In addition, we studied the penalization of IPRs law. We find that the situation in Thailand is totally different from a France, especially in criminal jurisprudence. It seems that the majority of decisions are the penalties imposed by criminal courts. Secondly were search about categories of damages and criteria for proof of damages. We find that the damages, in France as well as in Thailand, is the recovery of profit. Also the difficulty of assessing the damage, in France as well as in Thailand, are the damage of Trademark law, moral right damage and punitive damage
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "IPR infringemet"

1

Ross, Terence P. Remedies. Edited by Rochelle Dreyfuss and Justine Pila. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198758457.013.29.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter surveys the development of the law of damages and remedies in Anglo-American intellectual property (IP) law. It differentiates the two principal approaches to damages for IP infringement in the Western tradition—pre-fixed or statutory and discretionary damages—and explains several predicates for obtaining them. It also discusses how damages awards are calculated in IP, and what are their key elements. Finally, it discusses non-monetary remedies for IP infringement, including general principles of equitable awards with particular attention to their procedural requirements and potential defenses. The chapter concludes by identifying certain recent developments that may be expected to have a significant impact on this aspect of IP law in the future.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Mendis, Dinusha, Jane Nielsen, Diane Nicol, and Phoebe Li. The CoExistence of Copyright and Patent Laws to Protect InnovationA Case Study of 3D Printing in UK and Australian Law. Edited by Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, and Karen Yeung. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199680832.013.80.

Full text
Abstract:
The chapter considers the challenges faced by intellectual property (IP) laws, in particular copyright and patent laws, in responding to emerging technologies and innovation like 3D printing and scanning. It provides a brief introduction to 3D printing before moving to detailed analysis of relevant UK and Australian jurisprudence. Through this comparative analysis, the chapter explores whether copyright and patent laws can effectively protect innovation in this emerging technology, including consideration of both subsistence and infringement. The chapter suggests that 3D printing, like most other technologies, has a universal reach, yet subtle differences in the wording and interpretation of IP legislation between jurisdictions could lead to anomalies in levels of protection. It explores the possibility of a sui generis regime of IP protection for 3D printing, but submits that a nuanced reworking of existing regimes is, in the vast majority of circumstances, likely to be a sufficient response.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "IPR infringemet"

1

Guggenberger, Nikolas. "International Report." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 325–49. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tóth, Tihamer. "International Report." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 3–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Andersson, Helene. "Sweden." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 239–52. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hacisalihzade, Suzan. "Switzerland." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 253–65. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Jenkinson, Richard. "United Kingdom." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 267–303. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Shershun, Serhiy, and Anna Garbar. "Ukraine." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 305–21. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Zinober, Andrea. "Austria." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 351–64. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Steppe, Richard. "Belgium." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 365–402. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Oquendo, Felipe Barros. "Brazil." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 403–16. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka. "Czech Republic." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 417–31. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_18.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "IPR infringemet"

1

Acton, Michael R., Tim R. Baldwin, and Eric E. R. Jager. "Recent Developments in the Design and Application of the PIPESAFE Risk Assessment Package for Gas Transmission Pipelines." In 2002 4th International Pipeline Conference. ASMEDC, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2002-27196.

Full text
Abstract:
PIPESAFE is a hazard and risk assessment package for gas transmission pipelines, developed by Advantica for an international group of gas pipeline companies. Although the likelihood of failure of transmission pipelines is very low, the possibility of failure and a subsequent fire cannot be discounted. PIPESAFE provides the means to take consistent and informed decisions on risk issues, including infringements to pipeline design codes, uprating of pipelines (i.e. to operate at higher pressures), pipeline routeing and land use planning. The development of PIPESAFE was first reported at IPC ’98. This paper describes recent enhancements to the package, validation of the predictions against full-scale experiments and incidents, and modifications to the risk calculation methods. The paper also describes risk criteria developed in the UK and The Netherlands, the background to their development, and the use of PIPESAFE to generate risk criteria included in the latest edition of the UK pipeline code IGE/TD/1.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Carrozza, Gabriella, Marcello Cinque, Ugo Giordano, Roberto Pietrantuono, and Stefano Russo. "Prioritizing Correction of Static Analysis Infringements for Cost-Effective Code Sanitization." In 2015 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice (SER&IP). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/serip.2015.13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography