Academic literature on the topic 'IPR infringemet'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'IPR infringemet.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "IPR infringemet"
Ong, Hway-Boon, Yih-Jian Yoong, and Bahma Sivasubramaniam. "Intellectual property rights (IPR) awareness among undergraduate students." Corporate Ownership and Control 10, no. 1 (2012): 711–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i1c7art7.
Full textSarkar, Suvrashis, and Dr Stephen D’Silva. "A Case Study on IPR Infringement from Indian Consumer Goods Sector." International Journal of Scientific Research 2, no. 10 (June 1, 2012): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/22778179/oct2013/76.
Full textIslam, Mahbubl. "Legal Responses to IPR Infringement in Internet Sphere." Asian Journal of Humanity, Art and Literature 5, no. 1 (June 30, 2018): 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.18034/ajhal.v5i1.329.
Full textWANG, QINGFENG, and XU SUN. "EXPLORING CHINESE DESIGN BUSINESS OWNERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS." International Journal of Innovation Management 23, no. 06 (July 25, 2019): 1950059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919619500592.
Full textD'Rosario, Michael. "Intellectual Property Regulation, and Software Piracy, a Predictive Model." International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences 7, no. 4 (October 2016): 21–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijsds.2016100102.
Full textSchneider, M. "Measuring the scope and impact of IPR infringement in the EU." Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 7, no. 5 (April 9, 2012): 313–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jps054.
Full textRomaniuk, U. V. "EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE IN PREVENTING IPR INFRINGEMENT IN E-COMMERCE: LESSONS FOR UKRAINE." Comparative-analytical law, no. 1 (2020): 186–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/2524-0390/2020.1.43.
Full textAbbas, Asad, Anam Fatima, Kenneth Khavwandiza Sunguh, Anders Avdic, and Xuehe Zhang. "Digital Rights Management System in China." Journal of Cases on Information Technology 20, no. 1 (January 2018): 20–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2018010102.
Full textJuniotama Arifin, Alfredo, Ruth Elizabeth Marlamb Putri, and Tiara Patricia. "PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN PELANGGARAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL." Keadilan 19, no. 2 (September 27, 2021): 104–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.37090/keadilan.v19i2.484.
Full textGoel, Rajeev K. "IPR infringement in the United States: impacts on the input and output of R&D." Journal of Technology Transfer 45, no. 2 (October 30, 2018): 481–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9708-y.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "IPR infringemet"
Wang, Yinan. "Handling the U.S.-China Intellectual Property Rights Dispute – the Role of WTO’s Dispute Settlement System." Miami University / OhioLINK, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=miami1336224534.
Full textButr-Indr, Bhumindr. "La contrefaçon des droits de propriété intellectuelle : étude comparative en droits français et thaïlandais." Thesis, Paris 2, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA020031/document.
Full textCounterfeiting is an international problem. It appears that the main countries of origin of counterfeit goods seized in the European Union are the Asian countries, including Thailand. The research explains concisely the entire key factors to this whole problem. The research is divided into two parts; in the first place, I will outline pointly the definition of Intellectual Property Rights law (IPRs law) infringement between French and Thailand. Firstly, we focus on the structure of IPRs infringement. The term "counterfeit" in himself both in France and Thailand indicating different forms of an intellectual property rights liability conception. To identify violations constitute infringements, including the material element, we focus on four points, the existence of the creation, dissemination of the creation, use of creation, participation in the infringing action . With regard to the intentional element of infringement, iconcerned the intention of counterfeiter by the civil and criminal aspects as well as the objectives of my research would analysis on two components. First, the application of substantive issues embodies in the civil action. The second is the criminal action. The intention of counterfeiter are also intersect into two parts of action. The secondly,, we research to the proof of infringement. There provides two measures of proof in civil matters and evidence incriminal matters. In addition, there are a customs procedures as an alternative measure of proof . In the second place, we mainly concerned the IPRs law enforcement: Firstly we concerns the penalties imposed by criminal courts. We have already studied the criminal proceedings. In addition, we studied the penaltiesfor counterfeiting. We find that the criminal proceedings in Thailand is totally different from the criminal proceedings in France. In addition, we studied the penalization of IPRs law. We find that the situation in Thailand is totally different from a France, especially in criminal jurisprudence. It seems that the majority of decisions are the penalties imposed by criminal courts. Secondly were search about categories of damages and criteria for proof of damages. We find that the damages, in France as well as in Thailand, is the recovery of profit. Also the difficulty of assessing the damage, in France as well as in Thailand, are the damage of Trademark law, moral right damage and punitive damage
Books on the topic "IPR infringemet"
Ross, Terence P. Remedies. Edited by Rochelle Dreyfuss and Justine Pila. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198758457.013.29.
Full textMendis, Dinusha, Jane Nielsen, Diane Nicol, and Phoebe Li. The CoExistence of Copyright and Patent Laws to Protect InnovationA Case Study of 3D Printing in UK and Australian Law. Edited by Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, and Karen Yeung. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199680832.013.80.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "IPR infringemet"
Guggenberger, Nikolas. "International Report." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 325–49. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_14.
Full textTóth, Tihamer. "International Report." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 3–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_1.
Full textAndersson, Helene. "Sweden." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 239–52. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_10.
Full textHacisalihzade, Suzan. "Switzerland." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 253–65. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_11.
Full textJenkinson, Richard. "United Kingdom." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 267–303. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_12.
Full textShershun, Serhiy, and Anna Garbar. "Ukraine." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 305–21. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_13.
Full textZinober, Andrea. "Austria." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 351–64. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_15.
Full textSteppe, Richard. "Belgium." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 365–402. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_16.
Full textOquendo, Felipe Barros. "Brazil." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 403–16. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_17.
Full textMacGregor Pelikánová, Radka. "Czech Republic." In Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution, 417–31. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_18.
Full textConference papers on the topic "IPR infringemet"
Acton, Michael R., Tim R. Baldwin, and Eric E. R. Jager. "Recent Developments in the Design and Application of the PIPESAFE Risk Assessment Package for Gas Transmission Pipelines." In 2002 4th International Pipeline Conference. ASMEDC, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2002-27196.
Full textCarrozza, Gabriella, Marcello Cinque, Ugo Giordano, Roberto Pietrantuono, and Stefano Russo. "Prioritizing Correction of Static Analysis Infringements for Cost-Effective Code Sanitization." In 2015 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice (SER&IP). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/serip.2015.13.
Full text