To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Israël – Historiographie.

Journal articles on the topic 'Israël – Historiographie'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Israël – Historiographie.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Allegra, Marco. "Il 1948 nella storia di Israele. Appunti su un dibattito tra storiografia e politica." HISTORIA MAGISTRA, no. 1 (April 2009): 42–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/hm2009-001005.

Full text
Abstract:
- The article addresses the issue of the relation between historiography and the political debate. It examines the historiographic works concerning the events which lead to the emergence of the State of Israel between 1947 and 1949 as one of the key-periods in the history of the contemporary Middle East. In particular, the analysis focuses on the debate originating in the mid 1980s on the revision of traditional Israeli historiography undertaken by the so-called ‘New Historians', of whom Benny Morris is a leading representative. By drawing on the notion of the ‘public use of history, the author reverses the perspective, showing how the academic debate itself is characterised by strongly polemical aspects. The historiographic research on 1948, to which the works of the New Historians provide the latest significant contribution in terms of analysis of new sources, constitutes a firmer knowledge than the tones of the debate would suggest. Key words: public use of history, Israel, New Israeli Historians, first Arab-Israeli war, Palestine, Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Usher, Graham. "An Israeli peace." Race & Class 37, no. 2 (October 1995): 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030639689503700203.

Full text
Abstract:
Ilan Pappé, a lecturer in the department of Middle Eastern history at Haifa University, is known in Israel as one of the new 'revisionist' historians who have challenged received Israeli accounts of Israeli historiography. The author of The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict (I. B. Tauris, 1994), he is also the founder and head of the Institute of Peace Research in Israel.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Pappé, Ilan. "Historical Truth, Modern Historiography, and Ethical Obligations: The Challenge of the Tantura Case." Holy Land Studies 3, no. 2 (November 2004): 171–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/hls.2004.3.2.171.

Full text
Abstract:
The event described and commented on here occurred within the State of Israel, a week after the state came into being (22-23 May 1948). Although the Tantura Case is a significant chapter in the history of Israel/Palestine there is virtually no detailed reference to it in the works of Israeli or Palestinian historians, or of any other historian. Nevertheless, the Tantura events were also a subject of heated legal and public debate in Israel throughout 2001. The public controversy still generates strong passions. This article provides not only a description of the event and the controversy, and its ongoing social implications, but also discusses its impact on fundamental questions of historiography, such as the question of the nature and hierarchy of sources, as well as the scope and limits of the historian's imagination. It also poses even higher questions, namely those which impinge upon a historian's objectivity and moral obligations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lenssen, Anneka, Dina Ramadan, Sarah A. Rogers, and Nada Shabout. "Introduction The Longevity of Rupture: 1967 in Art and its Histories." ARTMargins 2, no. 2 (June 2013): 14–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/artm_a_00045.

Full text
Abstract:
This introductory essay by members of the Association for Modern and Contemporary Art of the Arab World, Iran, and Turkey provides a quick overview of the significance of the 1967 defeat of Arab military forces by the Israeli army for the historiography of modern and contemporary Arab art. It then details a recent turn to more critical engagement with that historiographic framework, as exemplified by the 2012 conference The Longevity of Rupture: 1967 in Art and its Histories, and introduces the four articles published in ARTMargins that came out of the conference.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Cohen, Mor. "Toward a Transversal Reading of Art and Politics in Israel." Israel Studies Review 33, no. 2 (September 1, 2018): 105–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/isr.2018.330207.

Full text
Abstract:
The 2011 Israeli protest for social justice marked a change in the responses of Israeli citizens to political and social matters. The ways in which art and social change intersected during the protest, and the emer- gence of art collectives following the events, call for an understanding of the relation between art and politics in Israel. This article suggests an alternative reading of socially engaged art in Israel. To this end, I use Félix Guattari’s notion of ‘transversality’ and Jacques Rancière’s theory on the ‘aesthetic regime’ to highlight signi cant periods where art and politics have intersected in ways that have challenged Israeli art historiography, often neutralizing the political within an artwork. By using a theoreti- cal framework that emphasizes notions of hybridity and the blurring of boundaries, I make new connections between times, places, and practices that go beyond the binaries of center and periphery, mainstream and alter- native, and aesthetics and politics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Condé, Mauro L., Raffaele Pisano, and Michael Segre. "Interview: Joseph Agassi." Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science, no. 1 (December 29, 2016): 116. http://dx.doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2016.i1.13.

Full text
Abstract:
Joseph Agassi is an Israeli scholar born in Jerusalem on May 7, 1927. He has many books and articles published contributing to the fields of logic, scientific method, foundations of sciences, epistemology and, most importantly for this Journal, in the historiography of science. He studied with Karl Popper, who was definitely his biggest influence. He taught around the world in different universities. He currently lives in Herzliya, Israel. For his important contribution to the historiography of science, we chose to open the first issue of this journal with this interview recognizing his importance for the field, as well as paying our homage to him.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Alroey, Gur. "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914." Jewish Quarterly Review 105, no. 1 (2015): 99–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2015.0004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Malsagne, Stéphane. "L'armée libanaise dans la guerre de Palestine (1948-1949) : vers un renouveau historiographique." Chronos 20 (April 30, 2019): 75–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.31377/chr.v20i0.475.

Full text
Abstract:
Du fait même de l'ampleur limitée de ses opérations militaires en 1948, le rôle de l'armée libanaise sur le front de Galilée a longtemps été le principal laissé-pour-compte dans l'historiographie de la guerre de Palestine et ce, au détriment des fronts syrien, jordanien et égyptien2. Du reste, les productions historiques successives sur la genèse du Liban moderne font souvent l'impasse sur l'état réel de la participation militaire libanaise contre Israël et les enjeux qu'a revêtu la première guerre israélo-arabe dans le fonctionnement des affaires politiques et militaires du pays. Liée en partie jusqu'à présent à la carence des sources disponibles, cette impasse historiographique semble d'autant plus importante à relever que la guerre de 1948 en Palestine est le seul moment avéré d'une contribution militaire libanaise dans l'histoire des guerres israélo-arabes au XXème siècle3. Historiens israéliens et anglo- saxons ont néanmoins récemment tenté de revisiter ce moment charnière, utilisant abondamment des documents militaires libanais, palestiniens, syriens et israéliens, tels que des rapports des services de l'armée (souvent israéliens), des témoignages d'officiers ou des mémoires
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Nosenko, T. V. "ISRAELI HISTORIOGRAPHY ON SOVIET POLITICS IN THE MIDDLE EASTERN WARS." Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS, no. 3 (13) (2020): 286–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2020-3-286-297.

Full text
Abstract:
Soviet policy in the Middle Eastern conflict and, in particular, in the Arab-Israeli wars of 1967– 1973 present a topic that has been comprehensively studied in foreign, and, above all, in Israeli historiography. Although Israeli specialists, as a rule, approach the study of this complex phenomenon on the basis of the accepted academic methodology and analysis of rather contradictory sources, the monographs discussed in this article present the reader with a very one-sided and biased interpretation of the role of the Soviet state in this historical period. They refute the traditional version that Moscow was interested in maintaining a controlled crisis, but not in its transition to a military phase, and tried to restrain the Arabs. Instead, Israeli authors I. Ginor and G. Remez set out to prove that it was the USSR, in secret conspiracy with the leaders of Egypt and Syria, that prepared attacks on Israel in 1967, oriented the Arabs exclusively towards a military solution to the conflict after the “Six-Day War” and prepared plans for a joint attack on Israeli positions in 1973. Soviet policy in the Middle East at that period was neither a model of “peacefulness and brotherly assistance”, as Soviet propaganda presented it, or a modern version of a “crusade” against the Holy Land, as Israeli authors portray it in the works under consideration. The complex interweaving of global and regional interests, ideological indoctrination, and internal political struggle for power were the main factors that influenced the process of political decision-making. Having excluded many of these factors from their research and rather subjectively approaching the selection of sources, I. Ginor and G. Remez presented a rather distorted and not credible version of events.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Harari, Dror, and Gillit Kroul. "Debating Natalism: Israeli One-Woman Shows on Experiencing Childlessness." New Theatre Quarterly 35, no. 02 (April 15, 2019): 121–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266464x19000046.

Full text
Abstract:
Natalism constitutes one of the main values of Israeli society, to the extent that the state’s explicit policy is to encourage and heavily finance childbearing. Whatever the reasons for this pronatalist ideology may be – religious, cultural, or politico-demographic – the fact is that, in twenty-first century Israel, motherhood is still considered a biological imperative; and a Jewish-Israeli woman’s reproductive body is implicitly mobilized for national needs. Against the backdrop of this persistent pro-birth agenda, in this study Dror Harari and Gillit Kroul discuss a noteworthy number of recently staged one-woman shows that critically debate the Israeli ‘fertility religion’ and the physical and emotional distress that it causes for the infertile and childfree woman. These autobiographical performances of infertility are seen as a sub-genre of Israeli critical disability performance, in that they manifest the idea that what defines the infertile as disabled is not (only) the woman’s biological deficiency but, rather, her inability to fulfil her national gendered role. Dror Harari is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Theatre Arts, Tel Aviv University. His Self-Performance: Performance Art and the Representation of Self was published in Hebrew by Resling Publications (2014), and his current research, funded by the Israel Science Foundation, focuses on the historiography of performance art in Israel from its origins in the 1960s and through the 1970s. Gillit Kroul has an MA in Theatre Studies from Tel Aviv University. Her book of poetry When the Sea Seeds its Hopes is published by Sa’ar Publications, and her short semi-autobiographical play in Hebrew Shnayim (Two), based on her experience of fertility treatment, is available at <http://pregbirthanthology.wixsite.com/anthology>.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Masalha, Nur. "New History, Post-Zionism and Neo-Colonialism: A Critique of the Israeli ‘New Historians’." Holy Land Studies 10, no. 1 (May 2011): 1–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/hls.2011.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
Ever since the 1948 Palestinian Nakba a bitter controversy has raged over its causes and circumstances. While the Palestinian refugees have maintained that they were driven into flight, Israeli historians claimed that the refugees either left of their own accord, or were ordered to do so by their own leaders. This essay explores the emergence of an Israeli revisionist historiography in the late 1980s which challenged the official Zionist narrative of 1948. Today the ‘new historians’ are bitterly divided and at each other's throats. The essay assesses the impact of the ‘new historians’ on history writing and power relations in Palestine-Israel, situating the phenomenon within the wider debates on knowledge and power. It locates ‘new history’ discourse within the multiple crises of Zionism and the recurring patterns of critical liberal Zionist writing. It further argues that, although the terms of the debate in Western academia have been altered under the impact of this development, both the ‘new history’ narrative and ‘Post-Zionism’ have remained marginal in Israel. Rather than developing a post-colonial discourse or decolonising methodologies, the ‘new historians’ have reflected contradictory currents within the Israeli settler colonial society. Also, ominously, their most influential author, Benny Morris, has reframed the ‘new history’ narrative within a neo-colonialist discourse and the ‘clash of civilisations’ thesis. Justifying old and neo-colonialist ideas on ‘transfer’ and ethnic cleansing, Morris (echoing calls by neo-Zionist Israeli politicians) threatens the Palestinians with another Nakba.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Alroey, Gur. "Israeli Historiography on American Jewry." American Jewish History 101, no. 4 (2017): 501–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ajh.2017.0064.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Lahav, Pnina. "A “Jewish State…to Be Known as the State of Israel”: Notes on Israeli Legal Historiography." Law and History Review 19, no. 2 (2001): 387–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/744134.

Full text
Abstract:
In 1953 a musical titledThe Adventures of Nasseradinopened in Tel Aviv. One of its tunes, the “Song of Law,” had music and lyrics so appealing that overnight it became the most popular song in Israel. The subject of the lyric was a tyrant, the Emir of the Kingdom of Buchara. Two brothers were arguing over a pot, and the Emir in his capacity as judge, presided over their trial. His decree: plaintiff and defendant should be executed and the pot thrown into the royal treasury.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Boum, Aomar. "“The Virtual Genizah”: Emerging North African Jewish and Muslim Identities Online." International Journal of Middle East Studies 46, no. 3 (July 18, 2014): 597–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020743814000658.

Full text
Abstract:
After the establishment of the State of Israel, the Zionist narrative dominated the histories and historiographies of Middle Eastern and North African Jewries. Accordingly, Jews and Arabs were largely kept as distinct binaries divided by the intellectual walls that separated Middle East studies and Jewish studies programs. Local North African and Middle Eastern scholars also silenced or overlooked the Jewish dimension of Middle Eastern societies in the same manner that Israeli scholars ignored the historical connections between Arabs and Jews that existed both before and after 1948. The exclusive, sacred yet ebbing, nationalist paradigm has been plagued with historiographical fissures in recent decades, allowing a new wave of intellectual engagement by a young generation of Jewish and Muslim scholars who began to put the Jew and the Arab back into local and global histories formed through complex social, cultural, economic, and political networks.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Niditch, Susan. "Historiography, “Hazards,” and the Study of Ancient Israel." Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 57, no. 2 (April 2003): 138–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096430005700203.

Full text
Abstract:
The biblical “historians,” perhaps more than their modern day counterparts, show history to be a messy, complicated affair. For all its ambivalence about power and human relationships, the book of Judges functions as a profoundly thoughtful foundation myth.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Pappéé, Ilan. "The Vicissitudes of the 1948 Historiography of Israel." Journal of Palestine Studies 39, no. 1 (2009): 6–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jps.2010.xxxix.1.6.

Full text
Abstract:
Arguing that history writing is a dialectical process fusing ideological agenda and political developments with historical evidence, the author analyzes the two major transitions experienced by the Israeli historiography of the 1948 war: from the classical Zionist narrative to the "New History" of the late 1980s, and from the latter to the emergence of a "neo-Zionist" trend as of 2000. While describing the characteristics of these trends, the author shows how they are linked to concurrent political developments. Most of the article is devoted to an examination of the neo-Zionist historians who have emerged in recent years, based on their previously untranslated Hebrew works.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Carroll, Robert P. "Clio and Canons: in Search of a Cultural Poetics of the Hebrew Bible." Biblical Interpretation 5, no. 4 (1997): 300–323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156851597x00111.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe enterprise of writing "histories" of "ancient Israel" in which biblical historiography is reproduced by old credulists or critiqued by new nihilists represents one of the leading edges of contemporary biblical studies in relation to the Hebrew Bible. This quest for a cultural poetics or cultural materialist accounts of the Bible is virtually equivalent to a New Historicism in the discipline. In this article analyses of three topics from current debates in biblical studies (historiography of "ancient Israel", the empty land topos, canons and context) are used to provide insights into how new historicist approaches to contextualizing literature may contribute to these current debates about the Bible.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Feige. "Passion and Territory in Israeli Historiography." Israel Studies 16, no. 1 (2011): 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/isr.2011.16.1.179.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Caplan, Neil. "Israeli historiography: Beyond the ‘new historians’." Israel Affairs 2, no. 2 (December 1995): 156–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537129508719384.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Sayigh, Yezid. "Escalation or Containment? Egypt and the Palestine Liberation Army, 1964–67." International Journal of Middle East Studies 30, no. 1 (February 1998): 97–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020743800065582.

Full text
Abstract:
Three decades later, the circumstances that led to the Arab–Israeli war of June 1967 bare again the subject of scholarly attention as the end of the Cold War and the release of official documents in the United States, Soviet Union, Britain, and Israel have allowed surviving participants to compare notes and made possible the detailed reconstruction of decision-making in those states. Much of this historiography has focused on the critical two months immediately preceding the start of hostilities, giving rise to broad agreement that Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser “stumbled into the crisis rather than provoking it deliberately,” through miscalculation and ill-advised brinkmanship. However, there is still no consensus regarding the relationship between Nasser's decisions in spring 1967 and his policy toward Israel in the preceding three years, partly because the dearth of official documents from the Egyptian side has made it difficult to substantiate his real intentions and “historicize” his crisis behavior. Most recent studies tend to skim over the earlier period, if they cover it at all, or now accept the view that Egyptian strategy before 1967 was essentially defensive, based on deterrence and containment, and that Nasser ultimately shifted course due to perceptions of threat that steadily heightened in the course of the previous three years due to the revival of the Arab “cold war,” fear of Israeli nuclear power, and deteriorating relations with the United States, all set against a background of the debilitating military entanglement in Yemen and economic malaise at home
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Roth-Cohen, Osnat, and Clila Magen. "Advertising and public relations in Israel: an integrated historiography approach." Israel Affairs 23, no. 4 (June 19, 2017): 690–714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2017.1333729.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Sela, Avraham. "Transjordan, Israel and the 1948 war: myth, historiography and reality." Middle Eastern Studies 28, no. 4 (October 1992): 623–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00263209208700924.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Hammer, Juliane. "The War for Palestine." American Journal of Islam and Society 20, no. 2 (April 1, 2003): 115–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v20i2.1860.

Full text
Abstract:
The events of 1948 mark the Palestinians' nakbah (catastrophe) and the Israelis' war of independence. The historiographies describing and analyzing these events have always been debated and contested. For instance, 1948 can be described as a founding element of Palestinian and Israeli iden­ tities respectively. A serious attempt to rewrite earlier historiography was introduced by the Israeli "new historians" in the 1980s. Based on documents and materials from recently opened Israeli archives, they set out to challenge Israel's founding myth and the lopsided description of the causes and events leading to the Palestinian refugee problem.The volume under review moves the rewriting a step further by attempting to take a fresh look at the Arab states' and the Palestinians' involvement in the development of the 1948 war. The editors suggest that it is possible, as well as necessary, to deconstruct the myths surrounding the Arab armies' defeat in 1948 by finding its causes in the Arab states' politi­cal situation and with each one's internal situation. The introduction explains the need for such a rewriting process and points out that much needs to be done, especially regarding the historiog­raphy of Arab states that stil I draw some of their legitimacy from their historical myths, often related to the 1948 war. Similarly, the Arab states' support for the Palestinians and their cause, as well as their participation in the 1948 war (to save Palestine), are almost always presented as inter­dependent and an example of high moral commitment. Opening Arab archives (civil and military) of this period seems to be a dream of histo­rians, rather than a realistic expectation, for the near future. Thus, the introduction concludes that much research in support of this critical tra­dition has yet to be done ...
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

van Seters, John, and Tomoo Ishida. "History and Historical Writing in Ancient Israel: Studies in Biblical Historiography." Journal of the American Oriental Society 121, no. 3 (July 2001): 505. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/606690.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Выдрин, Андрей. "Historiography in the Ancient Israel and the Scribes of the King Hezekiah." Библия и христианская древность, no. 1(1) (February 15, 2019): 138–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.31802/2658-4476-2019-1-1-138-162.

Full text
Abstract:
В настоящей статье анализируются теории о времени возникновения и специфике небиблейской письменности в Древнем Израиле. При этом основное внимание уделяется попытке обнаружить письменные предания, вошедшие и ставшие основой для написания 1-4 Цар. Несмотря на многообразные и зачастую противоречивые теории библейских критиков, рассмотренных в данной работе, есть все основания полагать, что древнеизраильская литература появилась, по крайней мере, при царях Давиде и Соломоне; второй этап её развития был связан с деятельностью иудейского царя Езекии. In the present article analyzes theories about the time of the occurrence and the specifics of non-biblical writing in the Ancient Israel. At the same time, the main attention is paid to the attempt to discover the written traditions that entered and became the basis for writing 1-4 Kings. Despite the diverse and often contradictory theories of biblical critics examined in this work, there is all reason to suppose that the Ancient Israel’ literature appeared, at least during the kings David and Solomon; the second stage of its development was associated with the activities of the Jewish king Hezekiah.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Выдрин, Андрей. "Historiography in the Ancient Israel and the Scribes of the King Hezekiah." Библия и христианская древность, no. 1(1) (February 15, 2019): 138–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.31802/2658-4476-2019-1-1-138-162.

Full text
Abstract:
В настоящей статье анализируются теории о времени возникновения и специфике небиблейской письменности в Древнем Израиле. При этом основное внимание уделяется попытке обнаружить письменные предания, вошедшие и ставшие основой для написания 1-4 Цар. Несмотря на многообразные и зачастую противоречивые теории библейских критиков, рассмотренных в данной работе, есть все основания полагать, что древнеизраильская литература появилась, по крайней мере, при царях Давиде и Соломоне; второй этап её развития был связан с деятельностью иудейского царя Езекии. In the present article analyzes theories about the time of the occurrence and the specifics of non-biblical writing in the Ancient Israel. At the same time, the main attention is paid to the attempt to discover the written traditions that entered and became the basis for writing 1-4 Kings. Despite the diverse and often contradictory theories of biblical critics examined in this work, there is all reason to suppose that the Ancient Israel’ literature appeared, at least during the kings David and Solomon; the second stage of its development was associated with the activities of the Jewish king Hezekiah.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Vrba, Vojtěch. "From Czechoslovakia to the State of Israel: Introduction to Legal Aspects of Czechoslovak Help to the State of Israel in 1947–1949." Vesnik pravne istorije 1, no. 1/2020 (February 3, 2021): 323–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.51204/hlh_20111a.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper introduces the reader to basic legal aspects of Czechoslovak help to the State of Israel in 1947–1949. During this time, Czechoslovakia exported arms, ammunition, fighter planes and other war material to the Jewish community in the Middle East. There was also a significant number of volunteers, who underwent various training courses in Czechoslovakia. These courses included training of pilots, aviation mechanics, paratroopers etc. All these operations had their legal merits and aspects. The paper analysis these aspects in general. The sources used in the paper are legal and archival documents and interviews, along with secondary sources and literature, both memoirs and historiographic.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Kadish, Alon, and Avraham Sela. "Myths and Historiography of the 1948 Palestine War Revisited: The Case of Lydda." Middle East Journal 59, no. 4 (October 1, 2005): 617–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3751/59.4.15.

Full text
Abstract:
Arab and Israeli revisionist historiography has taken the events in the town of Lydda (Lod, al-Lud) during the 1948 Palestine War (Israeli War of Independence) as an example of Israel's premeditated expulsion of the Palestinian Arabs in 1948, coupled with a massacre of civilian Arabs by the Israeli forces. Using newly released documents, the article explains the origins of these claims. It concludes that the expulsion was not pre-meditated but a consequence of a complex and ill-conducted battle, nor is there any direct evidence that a massacre took place.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Feldestein, Ariel L. "One Meeting—Many Descriptions: The Resolution on the Establishment of the State of Israel." Israel Studies Review 23, no. 2 (December 1, 2008): 99–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/isf.2008.230205.

Full text
Abstract:
This year, Israel marks the sixtieth anniversary of the establishment of the state. It is an opportune time to study anew the discussions in the People's Administration, which was founded on the eve of the declaration of statehood. In this article, I will examine the course of the discussions and the voting with regard to the declaration, as reflected in the primary sources, in the oral interviews with members of the People's Administration, and in the historiographic descriptions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Harari, Dror. "From Object to Performance in Israeli Art: A Historiography." TDR/The Drama Review 62, no. 4 (December 2018): 41–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/dram_a_00792.

Full text
Abstract:
Israeli art of the 1960s–’70s was a thriving scene of performative art practices, of which very little is known to the international community of performance researchers. Evolving gradually in response to new trends on the American and European art scenes, these performative manifestations reacted to and reflected the specific local circumstances that would eventually result in a major change in the country’s life, culture, and art.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Nur, Masalha. "Remembering the Palestinian Nakba: Commemoration, Oral History and Narratives of Memory." Holy Land Studies 7, no. 2 (November 2008): 123–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/e147494750800019x.

Full text
Abstract:
This year Palestinians commemorate the 60th anniversary of the Nakba – the most traumatic catastrophe that ever befell them. The rupture of 1948 and the ‘ethnic cleansing’ of the Nakba are central to both the Palestinian society of today and Palestinian social history and collective identity. This article explores ways of remembering and commemorating the Nakba. It deals with the issue within the context of Palestinian oral history, ‘social history from below’, narratives of memory and the formation of collective identity. With the history, rights and needs of the Palestinian refugees being excluded from recent Middle East peacemaking efforts and with the failure of both the Israeli state and the international community to acknowledge the Nakba, ‘1948’ as an ‘ethnic cleansing’ continues to underpin the Palestine-Israel conflict. This article argues that to write more truthfully about the Nakba is not just to practice a professional historiography; it is also a moral imperative of acknowledgement and redemption. The struggles of the refugees to publicise the truth about the Nakba is a vital way of protecting the refugees’ rights and keeping the hope for peace with justice alive.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Ben-Arie, Ronnen, and Tovi Fenster. "Politics of recognition in between antagonism and agonism: Exploring ‘mediated agonism’ in Jaffa." Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38, no. 3 (October 23, 2019): 405–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2399654419882033.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper presents a micro-geography research methodology that emphasizes the contested historiography of a house in 58 Shivtei Israel St in Jaffa. It explores the changing Palestinian/Israeli ownership of the house in its colonial urban setting, since 1948 until today, and analyses how it functions within current day urban planning and transformation. The detailed analysis of the specific allocation and planning procedure reveals how a binary conflict/consensus standpoint is not helpful to fully understand the political relations operating through the urban planning process. Rather, the paper suggests we need to think the relations between the two as a dynamic continuum along which we can locate the various claims of the different actors in the urban arena. This nuanced analysis helps us to uncover a contentious planning process which is based on contestation, tension and disagreement, but also on pragmatism and acceptance – a process through which the different actors reposition themselves with regard to their own and others’ objectives, beliefs and narratives of the urban space. Thus, the production of urban space could be understood as a dynamic process of controversy and dissent instead of as one of fixed and all-too-known positions and outcomes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Peretz, Don. "ZEEV STERNHELL, The Founding Myths of Israel: Nationalism, Socialism, and the Making of the Jewish State, trans. David Maisel (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997). Pp. 432. $18.95." International Journal of Middle East Studies 33, no. 4 (November 2001): 633–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020743801314071.

Full text
Abstract:
The principal focus of Zeev Sternhell's screed is Labor Zionism, although like other Israeli so-called new historians, he touches on relations with the country's Arabs, tensions between the Ashkenazi elite and Sephardi under-class, the Yishuv and the Holocaust, and attitudes toward and perceptions of Diaspora Jewry. The author, whose professional field has been European history, mainly France and Italy, was motivated to undertake this study by “serious doubts” (p. ix) about the generally accepted ideas sanctioned by Israeli historiography and social science. Using his skills as a professional historian, he probed Zionist and Israeli government archives and reread original texts to compare what he perceived as social and political realities with the ideology guiding policies. Sternhell is critical of traditional Israeli historiography because of the damage it has caused by separating Jewish history from general history. The consequences, he asserts, are “truly appalling” (p. x), resulting in paralysis of any real critical sense and perpetuation of “myths flattering to Israel's collective identity” (p. x). This has led many historians of Zionism “to lock themselves up in an intellectual ghetto” (p. x), leading to ignorance and emotional blindness.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

STEIN, REBECCA L., and TED SWEDENBURG. "Popular Culture, Relational History, and the Question of Power in Palestine and Israel." Journal of Palestine Studies 33, no. 4 (2004): 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jps.2004.33.4.005.

Full text
Abstract:
The marginalization of popular culture in radical scholarship on Palestine and Israel is symptomatic of the conceptual limits that still define much Middle East studies scholarship: namely, the prevailing logic of the nation-state on the one hand and the analytic tools of classical Marxist historiography and political economy on the other. This essay offers a polemic about the form that alternative scholarly projects might take through recourse to questions of popular culture. The authors argue that close attention to the ways that popular culture ““articulates”” with broader political, social, and economic processes can expand scholarly understandings of the terrain of power in Palestine and Israel, and hence the possible arenas and modalities of struggle.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Epstein, Alek D. "The Lost Gambit: The Third War between Israel and Egypt, its Causes and Lessons." MGIMO Review of International Relations 12, no. 4 (September 9, 2019): 161–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-161-179.

Full text
Abstract:
Yevgeny Maximovich Primakov knew the Middle East so well as, perhaps, nobody else in Russia did: he worked in Cairo from 1965 till 1969 and visited the city regularly after that period of time. He was personally acquainted with all of the highest representatives of Egyptian political and military elite. He had visited Israel multiple times since August, 1971. Five PrimeMinisters of the Jewish state (Golda Meir, Yitzhak Rabin, Menachem Begin, Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu) were his interlocutors in different years. Whatever views and powers he had in different years of his extremely intensive and multifaceted activity, the Middle East lacks very much statesmen of such magnitude and with such depth of understanding of geopolitical and regional processes which distinguished Yevgeny Maximovich, to the memory of whom the current essay is devoted. The June War of 1967 year, which is called in Western and Israeli historiography the Six-Day War, has radically changed the Middle East. Dozens of books and hundreds of scientific articles on this war have been published. The current research demonstrates the central role of Egyptian leaders in the onset of the war which nobody sought for. These lead-ers were driven by considerations and interests of pan-Arab solidarity which significantly contradicted in this case the interests of Egypt itself. By analyzing the causes of the war of June 1967 between Egypt and Israel it is proved that they laid to a certain significant extent beyond the context of bilateral relations of these countries.The tragic experience of June 1967 is important nowadays when it is taken for granted that a new war between Israel and Egypt could not erupt because these countries have nothing to divide after the return of the Sinai Peninsula. Once upon a time, in March 1957, Israel has already withdrawn its forces from the Sinai. The same situation of lack of territorial claims did not prevent abrupt escalation of conflict in May 1967 and the following outbreak of hos-tilities. Another important lesson is that security of any country, including Israel, cannot be guaranteed neither by deployment of the “blue helmets” nor by receiving American guaran-tees. As events of the second half of May 1967 demonstrated, both UN forces and American authorities were ready to shirk when the task of war prevention was most acute.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Asseraf, Arthur. "“A New Israel”." French Historical Studies 41, no. 1 (February 1, 2018): 95–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00161071-4254631.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractIn 1960–62 French officials considered partitioning Algeria between European- and Muslim-majority areas, much later and more seriously than the existing historiography shows. Even supporters of partition, however, remained ambivalent, regarding it as a “foreign” approach to decolonization opposed to French principles of territorial unity and racial equality. Thus they discussed partition by comparing Algeria to foreign models, in particular the partition of the British Mandate of Palestine that led to the creation of the state of Israel. Drawing on the private papers of Prime Minister Michel Debré, the writings of Alain Peyrefitte, and archives from the Ministries of Algerian and Foreign Affairs, this article argues that partition plans were failed attempts to deflect colonialism by looking sideways. To do so, the supporters of partition made use of comparison, a long-standing tool of the colonial administration.En 1960–62, le gouvernement français envisagea de partager l'Algérie entre zones de majorité européenne et musulmane, bien plus sérieusement et plus tard que ne le décrit l'historiographie actuelle. Mais même les partisans les plus ardents d'une partition restèrent relativement ambivalents face à ce projet, qu'ils considéraient comme une solution « étrangère » de décolonisation opposée aux principes français d'unité territoriale et d'égalité raciale. Ils évaluèrent ainsi la partition potentielle de l'Algérie en la comparant avec de nombreux modèles étrangers, en particulier la partition du mandat britannique de Palestine qui donna lieu à l'état d'Israël. S'appuyant sur les papiers du premier ministre Michel Debré, les écrits d'Alain Peyrefitte et les archives des ministères des Affaires algériennes et étrangères, cet article montre que les projets de partition furent des tentatives ratées de se détourner du problème colonial en regardant au loin. Pour ce faire, les partisans du partage firent usage de la comparaison, un vieil outil intellectuel de l'administration coloniale.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

OTTOLENGHI, MICHAEL. "HARRY TRUMAN'S RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL." Historical Journal 47, no. 4 (November 29, 2004): 963–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x04004066.

Full text
Abstract:
Historiographical accounts of Harry Truman's recognition of Israel have placed undue importance on this apparently sudden act on 14 May 1948. US Palestine policy has not been placed in the correct historical context of the Cold War. As a ‘Cold War consensus’ developed in Washington in the early post-war period, Palestine emerged as a secondary issue to the major concern that was the ‘Northern Tier’ of Greece, Turkey, and Iran. The US was guided by broad but clear objectives in Palestine: the attainment of a peaceful solution, a desire not to implicate US troops, and the denial of the region to the Soviets. Disagreements between the White House and the State Department were all expressed within these broad policy objectives. Israeli sources have been significant by their absence in the existing historiography of recognition. These sources reveal that for the Jewish community in Palestine, diplomatic victories were of secondary importance to the practical achievement of statehood. From both a Washington perspective, and the perspective from Palestine, US recognition was not regarded as a crucial issue at the time. It was a decision taken within the context of broad US objectives in Palestine, and it did not influence the decision of the Yishuv to declare statehood.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Friling, Tuvia. "A Blatant Oversight? The Right-Wing in Israeli Holocaust Historiography." Israel Studies 14, no. 1 (April 2009): 123–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/isr.2009.14.1.123.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Kaplan, Eran. "Nation and History: Israeli Historiography between Zionism and Post-Zionism." Journal of Israeli History 31, no. 2 (September 2012): 324–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13531042.2012.710777.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Rodman, David. "Nation and history: Israeli historiography between Zionism and post-Zionism." Israel Affairs 18, no. 4 (October 2012): 666–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2012.718495.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Barak, On. "Archives and/as battlefields: Political aspects of historiographic revision." Memory Studies 12, no. 3 (June 2019): 266–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1750698019836188.

Full text
Abstract:
For a short window of time between the deposition of Hosni Mubarak and the resumption of authoritarianism, Egyptian archives have become turbulent arenas in the struggle for governmental transparency and for democratic politics. This essay examines how attempting to access historical records pertaining to the Arab-Israeli 1973 war—arguably the most significant event reinforcing the reign of the Free Officers and their acolytes and a moment that encapsulates for many Egyptians “history” in a broader sense—became an important frontier in this struggle. After the war, various arenas in Egypt became lieus of war commemoration: not milieus that allowed a meaningful and agentive engagement with history, but sites that affixed a rigid, impoverished, and impoverishing understanding thereof. In postbellum Egypt, and much more so after 2011, contention revolved around transforming such sites into more open-ended environments.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Esther Meir-Glitzenstein. "Turning Points in the Historiography of Jewish Immigration from Arab Countries to Israel." Israel Studies 23, no. 3 (2018): 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/israelstudies.23.3.15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Dever, William G. ""Will the Real Israel Please Stand Up?" Archaeology and Israelite Historiography: Part I." Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 297 (February 1995): 61–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1357390.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Popp, Roland. "Stumbling Decidedly into the Six-Day War." Middle East Journal 60, no. 2 (April 1, 2006): 281–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3751/194034606783996500.

Full text
Abstract:
In the historiography of the 1967 War, the common reading is to portray it as an "inadvertent war." Using recently declassified documents, this article offers an alternative interpretation. In critically examining existing master plan theories, it is shown that the United Arab Republic's (UAR) military actions were limited in size and were without aggressive intentions. The Israeli decision to strike was taken not for military reasons but rather to prevent a diplomatic solution which might have entailed disadvantages for the Israeli side.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Rolnik, Eran J. "Therapy and Ideology: Psychoanalysis and Its Vicissitudes in Pre-state Israel (Including Some Hitherto Unpublished Letters by Sigmund Freud and Albert Einstein)." Science in Context 23, no. 4 (November 25, 2010): 473–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0269889710000189.

Full text
Abstract:
ArgumentFew chapters in the historiography of psychoanalysis are as densely packed with trans-cultural, ideological, institutional, and moral issues as the coming of psychoanalysis to Jewish Palestine – a geopolitical space which bears some of the deepest scars of twentieth-century European, and in particular German, history. From the historical as well as the critical perspective, this article reconstructs the intricate connections between migration, separation and loss, continuity and new beginning which resonate in the formative years of psychoanalysis in pre-state Israel.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Kimmerling, Baruch. "Between Celebration of Independence and Commemoration of Al-Nakbah: The Controversy over the Roots of the Israeli State." Middle East Studies Association Bulletin 32, no. 1 (1998): 15–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0026318400036105.

Full text
Abstract:
When The Jubilee year of the founding of the State of Israel arrived, the market was flooded with books, periodicals, special issues, TV documentaries and albums marking the 50th anniversary. As expected, some of these products stimulated sharp controversies, as a part of recent debates over Israeli historiography, collective memory, and identity. Perhaps the most controversy was focused on the Channel One (public TV) series titled “Tkuma” (“Revival”). Contrary to expectations, the series presented the Israeli past a little bit more courageously and less canonically than the usual conservative Zionist version. It was by no means a “revisionist” history, but for the first time the general public was exposed to a more balanced and less mythical version of Israel’s history. The uprooting and expulsion of the Palestinians during the 1948 war and their transformation into a refugee camp society were briefly mentioned with some empathy. Clips from the well-known Syrian reconstruction of the massacre in Kafr Qassem were aired. In the segment on Palestinian armed struggle use was made of films from the PLO archives (captured by the Israeli secret services during the 1982 invasion of Lebanon). The discrimination and peripheralization of the immigrants from Arab countries and their violent reactions (the Wadi Salib riots and the Black Panthers’ demonstrations) were not blurred. In general, alongside the state’s great economic, cultural, and military achievements, some of the shadows were remembered as well, such as Ben-Gurion’s one-man leadership and Golda Meir’s refusal to make any territorial concessions in exchange for security arrangements (peace?). Even the inevitability of the 1967 and 1973 wars was questioned. The series was heavily attacked and accused of being anti-Zionist, especially by the right-wing establishment. The Minister of Communication, Limor Livnat, who is in charge of public broadcasting, tried to “supervise” the series and especially the segment on the PLO; however, she withdrew when she was accused of censorship.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

DiTommaso, Lorenzo. "Apocalypses and Apocalypticism in Antiquity." Currents in Biblical Research 5, no. 3 (June 2007): 367–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476993x07077969.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper, in two parts, discusses the significant scholarship on apocalypses and apocalypticism in antiquity published since Mysteries and Revelations: Apocalyptic Studies since the Uppsala Conference (Collins and Charlesworth [eds.] 1991). Part II contains the second half of the section on (4) origins and influences, here the prophetic and sapiential traditions of Israel. This is followed by sections on (5) apocalyptic historiography and (6) the development of apocalypticism in antiquity and late antiquity, plus (7) a brief conclusion. The bibliographies are partspecific, but their entries are integrated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Stroganova, E. M., and D. A. Stroganov. "The Issue of Historicity of the Jewish Exodus from Egypt." Prepodavatel XXI vek, no. 3, 2020 (2020): 241–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.31862/2073-9613-2020-3-241-247.

Full text
Abstract:
The article analyzes and interprets the events of the biblical book of Exodus on the resettlement of Jewish tribes from Egypt, and compares it with data from extra-biblical sources, such as the Merneptah Stele and the works of Aristobul, given the achievements of domestic and foreign historiography of this issue. The article deals with the hypothesis of the two exoduses of the Jewish tribes from Egypt, the early references to them in the sources, and the interpretation of the inscription of the Merneptah Stele as well as the historical context of its creation. The article analyzes the term “Habiru” its identification with the Jewish people and related Semitic ethnoses living in north-eastern Egypt. Its various interpretations and connotations, which shed light on the social status of the Habiru, are examined. The first references to the Israeli people in the extra-biblical sources with biblical events of the book of Exodus are also identified. The chronology of the Book of Exodus is considered separately. Various translations and descriptions of the terms used to describe the social status of the Jews in Egypt according to the Septuagint are also given, and the changes in the position of the tribes of Israel in Egypt and possible causes that led to the migration of Semitic tribes to Palestine are monitored.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Piterberg, Gabriel. "Domestic orientalism: the representation of ‘oriental’ Jews in Zionist/Israeli historiography." British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 23, no. 2 (November 1996): 125–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13530199608705629.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Marashi, Afshin. "Re‐imagining nationalism: New studies in Arab, Turkish, and Israeli historiography." Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 9, no. 16 (March 2000): 89–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10669920008720161.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography