Academic literature on the topic 'Johann Gottlieb Schelling'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Johann Gottlieb Schelling.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Johann Gottlieb Schelling"

1

Cassagne, Agnès. "Une idée d'un système de la liberté : Fichte et Schelling /." Paris ; Budapest ; Torino : l'Harmattan, 2005. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb399709661.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Loock, Reinhard. "Schwebende Einbildungskraft Konzeptionen theoretischer Freiheit in der Philosophie Kants, Fichtes und Schellings." Würzburg Königshausen & Neumann, 2003. http://d-nb.info/986478903/04.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lopes, Adriana Alves de Lima. "O conceito de natureza em Schelling: um estudo sobre os escritos de 1797-1799." www.teses.ufc.br, 2007. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6486.

Full text
Abstract:
LOPES, Adriana Alves de Lima. O conceito de natureza em Schelling: um estudo sobre os escritos de 1797-1799. 2007. 110f. – Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia, Fortaleza (CE), 2007.
Submitted by Márcia Araújo (marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2013-11-05T16:45:56Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2007-DIS-AALLOPES.pdf: 462263 bytes, checksum: edd45aa734ebfcbdf93b2d4f969d4155 (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Márcia Araújo(marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2013-11-05T18:23:51Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2007-DIS-AALLOPES.pdf: 462263 bytes, checksum: edd45aa734ebfcbdf93b2d4f969d4155 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2013-11-05T18:23:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2007-DIS-AALLOPES.pdf: 462263 bytes, checksum: edd45aa734ebfcbdf93b2d4f969d4155 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007
Este trabalho visa analisar a concepção de natureza de Schelling a partir de seus escritos iniciais para mostrar que, à luz do jovem Schelling, a Filosofia da Natureza surge como um avanço da teoria de Fichte (que reduz a natureza ao Não-eu) numa dinamicidade da própria natureza. Mas, por outro lado, surge também como um resgate desta postura que assume um Eu absoluto e incondicionado como fundamento de todo saber racional. A partir desta relação originária entre Eu e Não-eu, Schelling elabora a idéia de uma natureza enquanto produtividade livre, orientada por uma atividade originária e incondicionada. Desse modo, sua Filosofia da Natureza surge como física especulativa, onde se faz necessário considerar não apenas os seus produtos, mas também sua produtividade; logo, há na natureza uma organização, de onde se deduz que tudo o que é comprovado na experiência é fruto de um princípio constitutivo da própria natureza, e não simplesmente por princípios regulativos (como pensara Kant). Portanto, para além de uma metafísica da natureza de Kant, Schelling a concebe como unidade objetiva de matéria e forma.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dispersyn, Eléonore. "Kant, Fichte, Schelling: essai sur la nature du mal." Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/210810.

Full text
Abstract:
Progression d'un concept, le mal radical, dans trois textes :La Religion dans les limites de la simple raison (Kant), Le système de l'Ethique (Fichte), et Le Traité de 1809 (Schelling). Origine ultime du mal :libre arbitre ou détermination ?Responsabilité et liberté du mal. Mal moral et métaphysique du mal/ Advance of a concept: radical evil, in three readings: Religion within the Limits of Mere Reason (Kant), System of Ethics (Fichte), and Treatise of 1809 (Schelling).Ultimate origin of evil: free will or determination? Responsibility and freedom to evil. Moral evil and metaphysics of evil.
Doctorat en Philosophie
info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Grosos, Philippe. "Système et subjectivité : étude sur la genèse et la disparition du concept de système." Paris 10, 1994. http://www.theses.fr/1994PA100169.

Full text
Abstract:
Ce travail consiste en une analyse des raisons de la genèse et de la disparition du concept de système en philosophie. Prenant appui sur le constat, relayé par Heidegger, de l'absence de revendication présente de cette configuration singulière du savoir, il en reformule l'exigence première afin de comprendre ce que métaphysiquement elle a pu engager, et ce qui progressivement aura pu en elle paraitre intenable. La première partie dégage une structure formelle du système commune à l'ensemble des penseurs de l'idéalisme allemand, de 1789 à 1800, et dès les premiers post-kantiens. Or cette systématicité, même à s'appuyer sur la subjectivité, reste trop extérieure à la chose-même, si bien que ces deux concepts n'apparaissent que comme des conditions de possibilités du système, non comme ses conséquences. La seconde partie, s'appuyant sur l'analyse de Heidegger, reprend le questionnement en dégageant le sens ontologique. Ainsi le système est-il une ontologie de la présence à soi absolue, que l’hégélianisme accomplit sans réserve. La troisième partie, en un premier moment, montre qu'au sein de l'idéalisme allemand, les considérations théologiques de Fichte et de Schelling ont progressivement mené a un retrait de l'ontologie de la présence, et donc du système. En un second moment, elle insiste sur la critique proprement phénoménologique qu'en fait Heidegger, et ouvre à une philosophie hors-système
This work is an analysis of the reasons for the genesis and disappearance of the concept of system in philosophy. Starting first from the fact that as Heidegger had noticed - this particular form of knowledge is nowhere claimed today, it reformulates its primary exigencies, in order to understand what it may have involved metaphysically and what may afterwards have appeared progressively untenable. The first part deliveates a formal structure of the system common to all the thinkers who built German, idealism, from 1789 to 1800, and from the first pre-Kantians onwards. Now this systematicity, even when it leans on subjectivity, remains too exterior to the thing by itself, so that these two concepts appear only as conditions that render the system possible, not as its consequences. The second part, relying on Heidegger’s analysis, resumes the search and brings out its ontological meaning. In this light, the system is ontology of the absolute presence to itself, which is accomplished unreservedly by Hegelianism. The third part, in first stage, shows that within German idealism the theological reflections of Fitche and Schelling gradually led to a retreat of the ontology of presence, and therefore of the system. In a second stage, it dwells on Heidegger’s properly phenomenological critique, and paves the way for a philosophy beyond any system
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Laudou, Christophe. "L'esprit des systèmes : les conditions subjectives de développement de l'idéalisme allemand." Dijon, 1995. http://www.theses.fr/1995DIJOL011.

Full text
Abstract:
Comment produit-on un système du savoir absolu? Le présent travail aborde cette question en analysant le rapport du sujet à sa parole, tel qu'il se présente dans l'idéalisme allemand : il s'agit, à partir d'une phénoménologie de la prise de parole, d'éclairer le devenir des systèmes postkantiens. Les quatre premiers chapitres tentent de dégager leurs conditions de production : l'idéalisme allemand trouve dans Spinoza une certaine conception du sujet, celle de la négation de la différence, qui s'oppose à la figure cartésienne du sujet porte-parole, et en fait la clé de voute d'un système entendu comme discours de l'institution, l'espace de parole du savoir absolu supposant de mettre le sujet a la place du mort. Les chapitres cinq à huit tentent de rendre compte du premier état du système de Fichte, Schelling et Hegel, et les chapitres neuf à dix esquissent leur évolution. L'impossibilité d'introduire dans le discours ce qui est soustrait par l'entrée dans la parole semble expliquer l'inachèvement de l'entreprise de Fichte et de Schelling et le hiatus qui subsiste chez Hegel entre le système et sa phénoménologie
How do we build a system of absolute knowledge? The present research tries to answer that question analyzing the subject speech relationship as seen in the systems of German idealism, which means highlighting the evolution of post-Kantian systems thanks to a phenomenology of speaking-up. The first four chapters try to make out the conditions of production of these systems : German idealism find in Spinoza certain conception of subject as negation of the difference, which is opposed to the Cartesian scheme of a word-bearer subject, and become the key-stone of the system seen as the institution-speech, the space of speaking of absolute knowledge impling putting the subject on the dead's place. Chapters five to eight try to give an account of the first state of Fichte, Schelling and Hegel’s system, chapters nine and ten give a hint of their evolution. The impossibility of introducing in the speech what is substracted by the speaking-up seems to explain the incompletion of Fichte and Schelling’s purpose and the discrepancy which still exists between Hegel’s system and its phenomenology
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Boss, Marc. "Le principe de l'autonomie chez Paul Tillich : ses sources kantiennes et post-kantiennes." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape10/PQDD_0004/NQ39337.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Johann Gottlieb Schelling"

1

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. La différence entre les systèmes philosophiques de Fichte et de Schelling. Paris: J. Vrin, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kongress, Internationale Schelling-Gesellschaft. Grundlegung und Kritik: Der Briefwechsel zwischen Schelling und Fichte, 1794-1802 : Dokumentation zur Lektüretagung der Internationalen Schelling-Gesellschaft in Zusammenarbeit mit der Internationalen Johann-Gottlieb-Fichte-Gesellschaft in Leonberg 2003. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Das Bewusstsein: Beschreibung und Kritik der Transzendentalphilosophie bei Kant, Fichte und Schelling. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Transcendental ontology: Essays in German idealism. New York: Continuum, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Tagung, Johann-Gottlieb-Fichte-Gesellschaft. Fichte und die Romantik: Hölderlin, Schelling, Hegel und die späte Wissenschaftslehre : 200 Jahre Wissenschaftslehre-- Die philosophie Johann Gottlieb Fichtes : Tagung der Internationalen J.G.-Fichte-Gesellschaft (26. September-1. Oktober 1994) in Jena in Verbindung mit der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität (Jena), dem Collegium Europaeum Jenense (Jena) und dem Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici (Neapel). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Limnatis, Nectarios G. G. German Idealism and the Problem of Knowledge : : Kant, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Limnatis Nectarios G, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Taiz, Lincoln, and Lee Taiz. Idealism and Asexualism in the Age of Goethe. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190490263.003.0016.

Full text
Abstract:
The resurgence of asexualism in Germany in the nineteenth century coincided with the Naturphilosophie movement associated with Romanticism which arose in reaction to mechanical models of the universe, among them Baron d’Holbach’s. Johann Gottlieb Fichte, a Kant disciple, claimed that the “absolute ego” creates it’s own reality, which we mistake for the “real world”. Friedrich Wilhelm Schelling, the “philosopher king” of the Romantics, attempted a balance between Fichte’s subjective idealism and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s (relative) objectivism. In general, nature philosophers granted equal weight to reason and to the imagination, and adopted a pantheistic theology, influenced by Baruch Spinoza. Franz Joseph Schelver believed the production of seeds was a vegetative process. August Henschell dismissed Koelreuter’s hybrids as artifacts resulting from experimental damage. He thought the release of pollen freed the spiritual essence of the plant from base matter. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel also challenged the sexual theory of plants.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

German Idealism And The Problem Of Knowledge Kant Fichte Schelling And Hegel. Springer, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lore, Huhn, Schwab Philipp, Schopenhauer Gesellschaft, Internationale Schelling-Gesellschaft, and Internationale Johann-Gottlieb-Fichte-Gesellschaft, eds. Die Ethik Arthur Schopenhauers im Ausgang vom deutschen Idealismus (Fichte/Schelling): Beiträge des internationalen Kongresses der Schopenhauer-Gesellschaft e.V. (Frankfurt a.M.), in Verbindung mit der Internationalen Schelling-Gesellschaft (Leonberg) und der Internationalen Johann-Gottlieb-Fichte-Gesellschaft (Halle), Freiburg im Breisgau, 5. bis 8. Mai 2005. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Johann Gottlieb Schelling"

1

Steigerwald, Joan. "Schelling’s Romanticism." In Schelling's Philosophy, 32–50. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812814.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper is a contribution to recent scholarly interest in the intersections of post-Kantian idealism and Romanticism. It traces overlapping concerns in Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling’s and Novalis’ works. Both thinkers began their philosophical studies with critical engagements of the philosophy of Johann Gottlieb Fichte, developing similar arguments for the duplicity of relationships of identity and the problem of their mediation. Novalis and Schelling also explored the intersections of mind and nature through notions of potentiation and depotentiation, stimulated by their respective philosophical examinations of contemporary mathematics and natural sciences. Finally, both thinkers introduced figures of a dark ground or night—Novalis in Hymns to the Night and Schelling in works as diverse as On the World Soul and Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom—to present the unpresentability of the infinite. Although there is little historical documentation of direct borrowings of one thinker from the other, these overlapping concerns are richly suggestive.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hösle, Vittorio. "The Longing for a System: German Idealism." In A Short History of German Philosophy, translated by Steven Rendall. Princeton University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691167190.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines German idealism, which is the only philosophical school of thought has retained the epithet “German.” The reason being is because it was the most intellectually ambitious philosophy that Germany has produced; and because it succeeded in integrating almost all the innovative achievements of earlier German philosophy in the shape of a system, the most complex form of philosophical thought. The religious motivation of the three main figures within this movement contributed to the emergence of a kind of philosophical religiousness that was new in world history. These three crucial figures are Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814), Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling (1775–1854), and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"Karoline von Günderrode (1780–1806)." In Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century, edited by Dalia Nassar and Kristin Gjesdal, translated by Anna C. Ezekiel, 62–84. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190868031.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter presents three unpublished works by Karoline von Günderrode. In them, Günderrode discusses and assesses the moral philosophy of Johann Gottlieb Fichte and Friedrich Schelling’s philosophy of nature, while also developing her own ethical account of the human relation to the earth in the essay “Idea of the Earth.” Widely regarded as her most important and radical contribution, “Idea of the Earth” distinguishes Günderrode among her contemporaries and places her in proximity to current environmental thought.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography