Journal articles: 'Joint stock company'

1

Becić, Ivan. "Vranje's credit bank: Joint-stock company." Bastina, no. 46 (2018): 326–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/bastina1845326b.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Becić, Ivan. "Vranje's Economic Bank: Joint stock company." Bastina, no. 46 (2018): 307–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/bastina1846307b.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Umanchik, N. P. "The Neftemash closed joint-stock company." Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 30, no. 11 (November 1994): 516–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01154914.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Belovski, Vojo. "Concept of a joint stock company." Journal of Process Management. New Technologies 5, no. 1 (2017): 25–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/iouproman5-12810.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Devlin, Joyce. "Joint Stock: From Colorless Company to Company of Color." Theatre Topics 2, no. 1 (1992): 63–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tt.2010.0023.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Michalski, Marek. "FORMY USTROJOWE SPÓŁKI AKCYJNEJ." Zeszyty Prawnicze 7, no. 2 (June 23, 2017): 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2007.7.2.02.

Full text

Abstract:

An Organisational Form of a Joint Stock CompanySummaryA joint stock company constitutes the most organised and formalised type of a commercial partnership in the Polish law. Its economic significance results from the aim of such a legal construction to conduct huge business ventures requiring an engagement of considerable financial and human resources. Thus, the legislator regulated the topic of a joint stock company in a much detailed manner than in case of other commercial partnerships, including a limited liability company. Hence, a joint stock company is a pure type of an association of capital, without personal elements, which causes that its functioning is subjected to the formalised rules specified by the provisions of the law. These rules not only describe the precise manner of actions during the formation of the joint stock company but also assign three basic stages of the legal being of the company. These stages are described in the legal study as organisational forms of a joint stock company and they include: (i) the stage of organisation, so-called joint stock company in organisation, in which actions aimed at the formation of the company and obtaining of the status of a legal person are being undertaken. At this stage, the company in organisation already has the status of a legal person, therefore it may participate in the legal trade as its participant with full rights; (ii) stage of the proper company, which begins with the moment of registering the company in the court register, which means obtaining the legal personality by the company. From that moment, the joint stock company begins its statutory activity; (iii) stage of the company in liquidation, in which the actions aiming at the termination of the legal being of a joint stock company and its removal from the court register are undertaken.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Bidabad, Bijan. "Joint stock company with variable capital (JSCVC)." International Journal of Law and Management 56, no. 4 (July 8, 2014): 302–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-09-2012-0031.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose joint stock company with variable capital (JSCVC), as financial sharing funds and banks necessitate that their capital and number of shareholders be instantaneously variable. Legal personality and accounts clearing of this type of corporations are different from conventional companies. Design/methodology/approach – JSCVC is a corporation in which capital and shares of shareholders vary by new entrance or withdrawal of shareholders at any point of time. Findings – Interest rate-based calculations were removed and Rastin Sharing Accounting was applied for JSCVS. Shareholders of JSCVC share the company’s nominal capital proportional to nominal values of their shares. Financial outcome of JSCVC is proportional to values of shares weighted by shares duration of participation. Research limitations/implications – To prevent spoiling of shareholders’ rights, legal procedure of issuing shares for JSCVC should be defined in compliance with domestic commerce laws in any country. Practical implications – JSCVC can be used by majority of investment funds, credit unions, saving and loan associations, pension and provident funds, thrift saving plans as well as Islamic banks and financial sharing activities. In JSCVC, deposit at a bank is treated as a share of the company (bank). Social implications – JSCVC has fair profit distribution and accounts clearing arrangements. Originality/value – Different variable capital companies have been defined in many countries’ laws, but essential modifications are presented in JSCVC definition to regulate financial sharing arrangements and bank’s performances.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Lebedev, A. O., and A. A. Dabizha. "Advanced products of cemdecor joint-stock company." Refractories and Industrial Ceramics 40, no. 9-10 (September 1999): 469–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02764202.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Singh, Anantdeep. "Adoption of the Joint Stock Company in British India: History and Patterns." European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 1, no. 2 (April 30, 2016): 280. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v1i2.p280-285.

Full text

Abstract:

The joint stock company was introduced to India in the late 17th century but only gained widespread usage in India during the 20th century. However, the adoption of the joint stock company was closely linked to family businesses and did not spread in a uniform manner across the population. This article will examine the spread of the joint stock company in India and look at four groups: Hindus, Muslims, non-conforming Muslims and Zoroastrians. We will suggest that the legal and business institutions of these four groups shaped their willingness to adopt the joint stock company.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Baibekova, Elmira, and Daniil Ivanov. "“Dead Souls” in the Activities of a Joint-Stock Company: The Legal Nature and Legal Consequences." Legal Concept, no. 2 (July 2021): 143–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2021.2.19.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction: in the paper, the authors highlight the problems of having “dead souls” or “lost” shareholders in a joint-stock company. The ways of their solution are analyzed. The purpose is to consider the advantages and disadvantages of “dead souls” in a joint-stock company. The question is raised about the need to modernize the legislation to solve this problem. Using the methods of scientific cognition, the authors analyzed the legal essence and legal consequences of the presence of “dead souls” (deceased shareholders) in the activities of joint-stock companies in order to identify the areas for improving the legislation in the field of regulating “dead souls” in a joint-stock company. Results: currently, joint-stock companies have difficulties with missing participants in the register, referred to as “dead souls”. This may cause significant losses to the joint-stock company and negatively affect the continuation of its activities. Conclusions: the majority of joint-stock companies that have previously fulfilled the obligation to maintain their own register do not now have the ability to control the personal data of shareholders and their participants. As a result, in this country, most joint-stock companies have difficulties with the presence of a general quorum at the general meetings of shareholders (50% + 1 share).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Galanov, Vladimir, and A. Galanova. "Joint-Stock Company As a Focus of Trends in the Formation of Private Wealth." Scientific Research and Development. Economics of the Firm 10, no. 1 (April 8, 2021): 48–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2306-627x-2021-10-1-48-55.

Full text

Abstract:

Joint-stock company is the most developed form of private capital association historically and logically growing out of the previous organizational forms of the existence of market organizations. A joint stock company is the result of the development of two interrelated processes. From the standpoint of economic content, a joint-stock company is the result of the development of the relations of production themselves from its natural forms to the commodity form and then to the form of the capitalist economy. From the point of view of the forms in which this content develops, in the form of a joint-stock company, the process of improving organizational forms that allow uniting private capital to achieve a single goal – making a profit – finds its "logical conclusion". Unlike the legal forms of a general partnership and a limited liability company, the form of a joint-stock company allows to combine a potentially unlimited number of investors and their capital on terms that most contribute to the maximization and preservation of private wealth, potentially for all members of modern society.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Kvasha, O. V. "The Features of Capital Management in Joint Stock Companies." Business Inform 2, no. 517 (2021): 266–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-2-266-273.

Full text

Abstract:

The article is concerned with studying of the features of capital management in joint stock companies. The concept of joint stock capital as an economic category is considered. The approaches to determining the essence of the concept of «joint stock capital» are analyzed. The system of management of joint stock capital of enterprise is presented, it is determined that the process of joint stock capital management is an aggregate of methods, forms and instruments for attracting funds from various sources in accordance with the needs of the development of the joint stock company. The formula for assessing the market value of enterprise is considered. The process of formation of equity of the enterprise is analyzed; the advantages and disadvantages of the types of sources of this type of funding are described. The peculiarities of attracting borrowed capital are studied and the influence of this method on the financial stability of the joint-stock company is described. The peculiarities of joint stock capital management on the example of PJSC «Motor Sich» have been characterized and conclusions have been drawn on optimizing the policy of capital management in joint stock companies. On the basis of the research of the theoretical aspect of the essence of the joint stock capital it is determined that the system of capital management in a joint stock company is characterized by interdependence and consistency of various subsystems and elements upon which depends the efficiency of functioning of the whole system, and, accordingly, the final result of effective capital management of the joint-stock company. Prospects for further research in this direction are the definition of new interdependences between the elements that influence the adoption of managerial decisions in the management of joint stock capital. Further development of the theory of joint stock capital management in the context of behavioral economics can lead up to the replacement of classical economic models of behavior of the economic entity and up to the creation of a new mechanism for managing the joint stock capital of the enterprise.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

GAIFULLINA, Marina, and Iskander GALLYAMOV. "STEEP-ANALYSIS OF THE STRATEGIC COMPETITIVENESS OF AN OIL COMPA NY IN THE OIL REFINING SEGMENT (on the example of Bashneft Joint-Stock Oil Company PJSC)." Vestnik BIST (Bashkir Institute of Social Technologies), no. 3(52) (September 30, 2021): 40–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.47598/2078-9025-2021-3-52-40-48.

Full text

Abstract:

The subject of the article is the strategic competitiveness of an oil company and methods of its assessment. The object of the study is the Bashneft Joint-Stock Oil Company PJSC. The purpose of the article is to determine the factors affecting the strategic competitiveness an oil company in the oil refining segment based on the use of STEEP-analysis. The assessment of the strategic competitiveness of the Bashneft Joint-Stock Oil Company PJSC using the STEEP-analysis methodology. The priority tasks of the Bashneft Joint-Stock Oil Company PJSC were determined based on the results of the STEEP-analysis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Маричић, Горан. "Closed joint - stock companies in Republic of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina / Zatvorena akcionarska društva u Republici Srbiji i Bosni i Hercegovini." Годишњак факултета правних наука - АПЕИРОН 4, no. 4 (July 30, 2014): 238. http://dx.doi.org/10.7251/gfp1404238m.

Full text

Abstract:

The new Company Law in Serbia, which was published in the Official Gazette of Republic of Serbia, No. 36/2011 of May 27 2011, in reference to joint-stock companies, makes no distinction between open and closed joint-stock companies. According to the new Law they all have become open. Closed joint-stock companies, as institute of French Law, have been abolished. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Srpska, the Company Law have defined divisions to open and closed joint-stock companies, similarly to the Company Law in Serbia since 2004. The author, in his paper elaborates and analyzes differences and similarities between open and closed joint-stock companies in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as in its entities.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Anon. "The ‘Plastik’ Open Joint Stock Company in Uzlovaya." International Polymer Science and Technology 28, no. 8 (August 2001): 34–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0307174x0102800808.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Shmeleva, T. P., A. L. Morozov, E. A. Zaiko, I. S. Budakhina, and V. S. Stanyulis. "Public joint stock company Slavneft-YANOS. Development history." World of Oil products the Oil Companies Bulletin 1, no. 1 (2021): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.32758/2071-5951-2021-0-4-5-12.

Full text

Abstract:

the article reviews the stages of enterprise establishment, its modern achievements, as well as deve-lopment prospects and plans for the modernization of production. Currently, the public joint-stock company slavneft yaroslavnefteorgsintez (SLAVNEFT-YANOS PJSC; YANOS) is one of the largest oil refineries in russia. The structure of the enterprise includes main and auxiliary production. The main activity of SLAVNEFT-YANOS PJSC is a production of high-quality commercial oil products and petrochemicals by means of efficient processing of crude oil. the plant produces more than 40 types of products: motor gasolines and disel fuel of euro 5 standard, fuel for jet engines, a wide range of oils (industrial, turbine, compressor, base oils), bitumen (road, roofing, construction), tar, asphalt, paraffin-wax products, aromatic hydrocarbons, liquefied fuel gases and heating fuel oil. High technological level of production, the use of the latest russian and foreign achievements in the field of oil refining, continuous modernization of equipment ensure the competitiveness of SLAVNEFT-YANOS petroleum products in russian and foreign markets.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Galanov, Vladimir, and A. Galanova. "Share Repurchase As the Instrument of the Management of the Capital of the Company." Scientific Research and Development. Economics of the Firm 9, no. 2 (June 25, 2020): 44–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2306-627x-2020-44-50.

Full text

Abstract:

The joint-stock company is a participant in the primary stock market, primarily as an issuer of shares and bonds. However, in the event of the repurchase of its shares, the joint-stock company may also act as a specific participant in the secondary market. When buying its own shares, the joint-stock company is turning into a specific type of investor and speculator in the stock market, and the shares it purchases form a redemption issue portfolio that requires proper management, as well as an investment portfolio. Share repurchases may have economic, “technical” and even political and social reasons. Repurchased shares may relate to a group of treasury shares or a group of quasi-treasury shares. The existence of quasi-treasury shares means that there is an opportunity in which it is not external shareholders who control the joint-stock company but the company's top management, which is no longer under the control of the shareholder group.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Gabov, Andrey V. "Exemption of a joint stock company from the obligation to provide information to a shareholder." Law Enforcement Review 4, no. 3 (October 5, 2020): 103–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(3).103-122.

Full text

Abstract:

The subject of research. Issues concerning the exercise of the right of shareholders to receive information are analyzed. The focus is on the issues of exemption of a joint-stock company from providing information. The development of the institute of the information provision to shareholders by joint stock companies are consistently analyzed. The main trends in the development of this institute are shown: gradually narrowing the ability of shareholders to exercise their right to receive information through such means as restriction, differentiation and exemption from providing information. Special emphasis is placed on the institute of exemption from providing information. The purpose of the article is to show the main drawbacks of the existing model of exemption of a joint-stock company from the obligation to provide information to shareholders and to formulate directions for the development of legislation. The author's main scientific hypothesis can be summarized as follows. The Federal law «On joint-stock companies» contained an initial defect in the description of information exchange between a shareholder and a joint-stock company. The shareholder's right to information was not described, in fact, it was «embedded» in the obligation of the joint-stock company to provide information. The subsequent changes to the law resulted in a narrowing of the rights of the shareholder, practically depriving the minority shareholder of the right to information. This defect has led to significant legal uncertainty when the joint-stock company exercises its right to be exempt from providing information. This uncertainty should be eliminated, because the regulatory goals for granting joint-stock companies an exemption from the obligation to provide information to shareholders (article 92.2 of the Federal law «On joint-stock companies» that counters sanctions pressure) are absolutely correct. At the same time, some of the grounds for exemption from the obligation to provide information to shareholders (article 92.1 of the Federal law «On joint-stock companies») must either be excluded or reformulated. The author notes the complete «break» between the current regulation and the ideas about information exchange between a shareholder and a joint-stock company, that initially inspired the creation of the law on joint-stock companies. The inclusion of sanctions in the law on joint - stock companies as a factor affecting the performance by a joint-stock company of its obligation to provide information to shareholders should be fully welcomed. However, the legal and technical design of the corresponding political and legal idea cannot be considered optimal. In this part, the legislation requires a complete renovation based on the principle of balancing constitutional values and the interests of the state, majority and minority shareholders. Description of research methodology. The research is based on a systematic analysis, as well as the interpretation of Russian legislation and doctrine. Information about the main scientific results. The development of legislation on joint-stock companies in terms of providing information is shown. It is shown that if legislator taking into account sanctions when regulating the obligation of a joint-stock company to provide information, the goals of legislative regulation fully comply with constitutional principles, but specific legal decisions cannot be considered optimal. Conclusions. It is concluded that development of legislation on joint-stock companies has led to a significant restriction of the ability of shareholders to receive information. The author formulated the priority of regulatory goals in countering sanctions pressure and offered specific directions for improving legal regulation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Mucha, Ariel, and Marcin Mazgaj. "The New Kid on the Block on the European Market for Corporate Legal Forms: A Polish Laboratory for a Modern Close Corporation." European Company Law 17, Issue 2 (April 1, 2020): 45–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eucl2020008.

Full text

Abstract:

Entering into force in 2021, Poland will have a new legal form: the simplified joint stock company (sJSC). The sJSC is especially relevant for start-ups companies. simplified joint stock company (sJSC), Polish corporate law

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Галанов, Vladimir Galanov, Галанова, and A. Galanova. "The Principle of Joint-Stock Companies." Economics of the Firm 5, no. 4 (December 18, 2016): 16–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/24435.

Full text

Abstract:

Development of capital relationship occurs in many areas. We can identify the main two of them: the development of the main organizational form of business activity as joint-stock companies and the development of their reproductive activity, which is reflected in the fundamental change in the processes of formation of the cost of the goods produced by these companies. The main trend in the development of a joint stock company may be called the “socialization of capital”, which not only retains many of the old ways of the private appropriation of profits, but also creates new kinds of them. The chain of commercial structures development involves conversion of the national jointstock companies into the international joint-stock companies, or multinational companies. This, in turn, leads to the transformation of a number of states, among which we include the developed or rich countries of the world, into a kind of “joint-stock” societies, whose citizens have an opportunity to increase (through an appropriate system of maintenance of a high level of wages and social benefits) their personal consumption financed by appropriating a disproportionately large part of the total world income by the country as a whole. Such a country objectively turns into a special economic-social form of existence of the joint-stock company. The basis for such a transformation of the state into a sort of joint-stock company is a new nature of production of the majority of modern goods. It consists in the change of the creation process of goods’ value which leads to the complete subordination of all its stages to the corresponding MNC groups.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Harahonych, O. V. "The problems of joint stock company liquidation and ways of their settlement." Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, no. 1 (July 1, 2021): 54–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2021.01.10.

Full text

Abstract:

The article explores the problematic aspects of joint stock company liquidation. The essence and types of liquidation of joint stock companies have been analysed. The distinctive features of voluntary, compulsory and enforced liquidation of joint stock companies, as well as the liquidation of a bankrupt joint stock company and the liquidation on the basis of the law have been determined. The elements of the legal composition constituting the basis for the termination of joint stock companies by voluntary liquidation have been investigated. The complexity of the procedure of voluntary liquidation has been established. The expediency of introducing a simplified mechanism of voluntary liquidation has been substantiated. The main factors that hinder the liquidation of joint stock companies in Ukraine in the current context have been identified. The main problems of terminating joint stock companies through forced liquidation and the reasons for their emergence have been revealed. The main obstacles to compulsory liquidation of joint stock companies by judicial and administrative procedure have been elucidated. It has been ascertained that the current Ukrainian legislation on liquidation is still in its formative stage, characterized by inconsistencies, internal contradictions and fails to solve the main problem – a civilized exit of business entities, including joint stock companies, from the sphere of economic relations. Special emphasis is placed on researching the prospects for the development of legal regulation of relations connected with the liquidation of joint stock companies in the context of solving the revealed issues. It has been proposed as a priority step to address the problems of liquidation of joint stock companies by ensuring an adequate level of legal and regulatory regulation of the relations to terminate such organisations through liquidation. It has been reasoned that further research should be conducted into specific recommendations for solving the problems of JSC liquidation in order to consider them in the preparation of Draft No. 2493 for the second reading in the Supreme Council of Ukraine, as well as the systematisation of general rules on voluntary and compulsory liquidation in the Civil Code of Ukraine.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Hussien Hlayyel Suleiman Alsarahen, Hussien Hlayyel Suleiman Alsarahen. "Jurisprudential Qualification for the joint-stock Company its Legality in Islamic Jurisprudence: التكييف الفقهي للشركة المساهمة ومشروعيتها في الفقه الإسلامي." Journal of Islamic Sciences 4, no. 2 (June 30, 2021): 96–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.n251120.

Full text

Abstract:

This study discusses the joint-stock company issue regarding its definition, its regulations, its qualification, and its legality in Islamic jurisprudence. This research is distinguished from other studies that shed the light on the same issue by dealing with the jurisprudential qualification for the joint-stock company, its legality, and the different opinions of the jurisprudents regarding its legality and discussing the legality proofs Then, the research explains which opinion outweighs others. the paper also explains both the jurisprudential and legal definitions of the joint-stock company and its regulations. The conclusion of the study includes results and recommendations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Revenco, Valentina. "Legal aspects regarding the formation and structure of the share capital of the joint stock company." National Law Journal, no. 3(245) (February 2022): 102–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2021.3(245).11.

Full text

Abstract:

The share capital of the Joint Stock Company is a baseline figure, contractual (provided in the Articles of association) and accounting (recorded in the liabilities side of the balance sheet) which shows, from a legal point of view, the level of the shareholders’ contribution obligation and, by default, the limit of shareholders’ liability, and the value of the goods of the company’s assets that are subject to the legal rules of the share capital, this being also called nominal capital or figure capital. The share capital of a Joint Stock Company is created by the shares placed by the shareholders and represents the value in kind and in cash, exclusively for certain categories of Joint Stock Companies, paid proportionally to the number and value of the subscribed shares. Analyzing the provisions of the legal acts, as well as the doctrinal opinions, we conclude that the contribution represents the manifestation of will of the shareholders, which consists in undertaking the obligation to contribute to the formation of the share capital of a Joint Stock Company determined by the transfer in ownership or use of a property in the assets of that company, in exchange for any shares, as well as the factual and legal fulfilment of such obligation by the actual transfer of such property to the company. The share capital of the Joint Stock Company includes the value of the cash and in-kind contributions paid at the time of the company’s incorporation or subsequently, by additional subscriptions. The law does not require that the contributions of the shareholders (stockholders) be equal in value or have the same object, and in the event of a single shareholder to be as a unitary object. Because, the property that forms the share capital of the Joint Stock Company ensures its economic activity and free participation in the civil circuit.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Grosclaude, Laurent. "The French «Société Par Actions Simplifiée - SAS», All Purpose Vehicle!" Central European Journal of Comparative Law 1, no. 2 (December 9, 2020): 49–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.47078/2020.2.49-57.

Full text

Abstract:

The Société à Responsabilité Limitée or the limited liability company (SARL) and the Société Anonyme or the public limited company (SA) were perceived as relatively rigid or inadequate company types. Besides the reform of these traditional types of company forms, in 1994, a new company type was created as a flexible vehicle for businesses: the Société par Actions Simplifiée – the SAS (simplified joint stock company). Further changes in 1999 and 2008 made businesses even more adaptable. In 2019, more than 65% of newly created legal entities were established as a SAS; SARL around 30%, and SA less than 2%. SAS has a single member variant, the SASU (U for unipersonnel – one person). The French experience showed that the simplified joint stock company responded to a real economic and organisational need. The new company form based on limited liability has become widely accepted and useful. The simplified joint stock company was introduced by Poland as a new company form in 2019. Other states may also consider the French experience based on the comparative advantages of this peculiar business organisation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Zagoruiko, I. Yu, and P. V. Magdanov. "JOINT-STOCK COMPANY AS A FORM OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: HISTORY AND GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS." Business Strategies 9, no. 9 (October 6, 2021): 280–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.17747/2311-7184-2021-9-280-285.

Full text

Abstract:

The article considers the joint-stock company as a form of economic activity. The authors analyze the process of formation of joint-stock law in Russia, its development and current. It is stated that today the joint-stock form of economic activity in Russia does not occupy a significant place in the national economy. The reason is the insufficient development of joint-stock (corporate) law in Russia, as a result of which the founders in the organization of entrepreneurial affairs do not show proper interest in the joint-stock organizational and legal form.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Bulut, Aldulkadir. "Transfer of management authority in joint stock company content." Pressacademia 2, no. 1 (June 1, 2016): 574. http://dx.doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2016118680.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Zoran, Arsic. "Joint stock company memorandum of association and environmental protection." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad 46, no. 1 (2012): 119–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-1690.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Milosavljević, Miroslav, and Jelena Milosavljević. "Corporate rights of shareholders in a joint stock company." Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine 89, no. 5-8 (2017): 443–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/gakv1712443m.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Stepkin, Stanislav P. "JOINT STOCK COMPANY AS A SUBJECT OF CIVIL LAW." RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Economics. Management. Law, no. 1 (2018): 141–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2018-1-141-149.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Konopyanova, Galina. "Developing a corporate management in a joint-stock company." Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business 2, no. 2 (October 9, 2009): 58–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.15208/pieb.2009.19.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Pilyugin, V. V., K. B. Rudyak, V. P. Kostyuchenko, K. V. Baklashov, Yu N. Lebedev, E. V. Eldasheva, G. S. Vulisanova, and Yu D. Khanin. "EDU–AVT Units at Orsknefteorgsintez Open Joint–Stock Company." Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils 40, no. 1 (January 2004): 8–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:cafo.0000021586.16479.45.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Kurtashin, V. E. "Cryogenic equipment and the open joint-stock company kriogenmash." Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 35, no. 9 (September 1999): 496–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02365973.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Frolov, S. A. "New developments at the open joint-stock company “BAZ”." Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 36, no. 5 (May 2000): 298–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02463385.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Masal'skii, Ya S., and R. P. Samygin. "The Joint-Stock company Chermetavtomatika: Main directions of activity." Metallurgist 43, no. 12 (December 1999): 550–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02463579.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Anzheurov, N. M. "Joint stock company in the coming-to-be market." Refractories 36, no. 9 (September 1995): 295–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02306197.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Moulis, P. "Corporate governance vs. crisis of company." Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 49, No. 6 (March 1, 2012): 275–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/5386-agricecon.

Full text

Abstract:

There is a lot of available investigations in the area of company crisis reasons problems nowadays. These inquiries were summarised into the indicators of company crisis reasons. The development and level of these indicators is not possible to consider to be company crisis reasons but above all to be its manifestation. The veritable reason of crisis is the absence of effective control mechanisms in the company, especially of the “natural” control mechanisms. The natural control mechanism means such as rises from the substance of joint stock companies (respectively legal rules of joint stock company). There is a presumption of control activities interaction among the General Assembly, Supervisory Board and Board. Control mechanisms work on the common economic principles’ base in this sense and it means that the owner is considered to be the primary managing element and the management acts as the derivative managing element. The assumption of effective economic principles functioning is the existence of standard variable of these relations i. e. the existence of relevant interests.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Терновая, Ольга, and Olga Tyernovaya. "LEGAL STATUS OF MANAGEMENT BODIES IN SHARE HOLDING COMPANIES IN FRANCE AND IN RUSSIA." Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 1, no. 5 (December 2, 2015): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/16137.

Full text

Abstract:

The article reviews legal nature of joint stock companies’ corporate bodies in accordance with the French and Russian legislations. Despite the influence of Anglo-American approaches on the formation of the Russian corporate legislation, the author proposes to more actively take into account the positive experience of countries with the continental law as they are closer to the Russian juridical reality. In this context the author pays special attention to the French legislation on joint stock companies. The author notes two most powerful trends in the evolution of the French corporate legislation: on the one hand, these are major changes in the substantive legal framework for governance and relations between the participants and the company, and on the other hand — important changes in legal regulation over governance and relations between the company participants. Comparison of certain issues in the legal nature of joint stock companies’ corporate bodies (boards) in Russia and France allows making the conclusion that the French legislation regulates in more detail such topical issues as peculiarities of the joint stock companies’ governance models, powers of a sole executive body, basis for civil responsibility of persons who are part of corporate bodies of a joint stock company.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Galanov, Vladimir, and A. Galanova. "Development Trends of Joint Stock Companies." Scientific Research and Development. Economics of the Firm 10, no. 4 (December 27, 2021): 55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2306-627x-2021-10-4-55-62.

Full text

Abstract:

Joint-stock company is the pinnacle of development of organizational forms of functioning of private capital. Having emerged at a certain stage in the development of the market, a joint-stock company has become the leading form of concentration of private capital and the main source of their further growth including the form of citizens' money savings. The expansion of the size and circle of private capital owners, in turn, required further development of the specific composition of joint-stock companies, on the one hand, towards increasing their publicity and increasing the number of shareholders, and, on the other hand, in order to ensure the processes of the fastest, cheapest, complete and the relatively “safe” inclusion of small private savings in total equity. This revealed the specific process of the division of labor in the field of investment. Investment funds that specialized in "collecting" private savings for their investment in stakes in different companies have emerged, and professional financial intermediaries have developed in order to provide all the necessary services to ensure the process of mass investment in shares. Taken together, all these processes reflect the growth of the social character of modern private capital uniting in joint-stock companies and similar organizations. However, this process of growth of "socialization" of private capital has its own internal limit, which is that any form of pooling of private capital should not cease to be a source of growth of private capital and personal wealth of members of modern society.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Patakyová, Mária, Matej Kačaljak, Barbora Grambličková, Ján Mazúr, and Patrícia Dutková. "Slovak Simple Joint Stock Company – Critical Review and Preliminary Assessment." European Company and Financial Law Review 17, no. 2 (May 7, 2020): 205–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2020-0011.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to describe a relatively new legal form of the simple joint stock company introduced into Slovak company law in 2017 and evaluate whether it may indeed be a suitable corporate vehicle for new companies with highly innovative potential (startups), or alternatively assess whether the legal form is suitable for other legal and business use cases; and explore and identify potential issues.Moreover, this paper provides an overview and legal analysis of the legal regulation of the simple joint stock company form in comparison with other legal company forms. The attractiveness of some of the key elements of the simple joint stock company’s regulation is verified by an empirical statistical method from public databases. Additionally, the article also provides an assessment as to what extent the identified objectives of the policy maker in relation to the introduction of the new legal form were achieved.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Łojek, Paweł. "THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF A SIMPLE JOINT-STOCK COMPANY COMPARED TO OTHER CAPITAL COMPANIES IN POLAND." Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas Zarządzanie 22, no. 3 (September 30, 2021): 159–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.4264.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of the article is to present a new form of business activity which is P.S.A. (Prosta Spółka Akcyjna). The provisions of the Commercial Companies Code, provisions of the balance sheet and tax law as well as the author’s professional experience were used for the analysis. Research results: A simple joint-stock company may be a competitive form of running a business in relation to a limited liability company. The discussed provisions constitute a great opportunity for a simple joint-stock company and a likely high percentage of establishing this type of business activity. The SWOT analysis was used as the research method. Contribution to the development of the discipline: review of the current legal regulations in Poland, comparison of forms of business activity and analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of a simple joint-stock company.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Zhegera, Ch V. "Ensuring the Quality of Construction Production on an Example of Open Joint Stock Company "Reinforced Concrete Structures-1", City Penza." Applied Mechanics and Materials 873 (November 2017): 193–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.873.193.

Full text

Abstract:

The considers the concept of competitiveness of a construction company. Provides information aboutthe necessity of calculation of the production potential of the enterprise. Given the formulas to calculate the production capacity of the enterprise. Given the results of the evaluation of the competitiveness of the building enterprise of Open Joint Stock Company "Reinforced concrete structures-1" in city Penza. Presents the results of the evaluation analysis of the factors influencing the productive capacity of the enterprise. Submitted theweight of each factor affecting the production potential of the enterprise. Calculated the value of the production potential Given the state of the stability of technological process, the financial condition and the condition of other factors in the company of Open Joint Stock Company "Reinforced concrete structures-1"showed that the company uses its capacity only at 80% The evaluation of industrial potential of the enterprise developed recommendations to improve the competitiveness of the enterprise Open Joint Stock Company "Reinforced concrete structures-1", city Penza. The recommendation is to use intensive and extensive reserves of the company.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Kostyuk, Alexander, and Olena Kostyuk. "Minority shareholders vs. the state: the case of JSC “UKRNEFT”." Corporate Ownership and Control 2, no. 3 (2005): 106–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv2i3p11.

Full text

Abstract:

The joint-stock company "Ukrneft" is a good example for understanding the role of asymmetry of information in the corporate governance. Corporate ownership structure is characterized by high enough concentration. The state is the largest stockholder, owning 50%+1 company stock, i.e. controlling block. Besides the state, there are some large shareholders in the structure of corporate ownership of the joint stock company "Ukrneft’". They are represented by Pryvatbank, Ukrsybbank and Wotford Groups. The consolidated shareholding of these shareholders is 41 % of voting shares. The remaining 9 % of shareholder equity belong to the rest minority shareholders

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Bessolitsyn, Aleksandr A. "А. Khanzhonkov and Co Joint-Stock Company and its competitors in Russia." Historia provinciae – the journal of regional history 5, no. 3 (2021): 780–842. http://dx.doi.org/10.23859/2587-8344-2021-5-3-4.

Full text

Abstract:

The article is based on the archival files of joint-stock companies in the film industry, stored in the fonds of the Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA), the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art (RGALI), and the Central State Historical Archive of St Petersburg (TsGIA SPb) as well as statistics digests Joint-Stock Companies of Russia (1912–1917) and scientific literature and focuses on the analysis of the activities of A. Khanzhonkov and Co Joint-Stock Company and its competitors in the film industry at the beginning of the twentieth century. A. Khanzhonkov’s joint-stock company, which gradually developed from a small trade and commission business that supplied the Russian market with films and equipment produced mainly by European, became a leader in the Russian pre-revolutionary film market. The company steadily made a profit, increased its fixed and reserve capital, and also paid dividends to shareholders annually. The author came to the conclusion that it is A. Khanzhonkov and Co Joint-Stock Company that was most successful and effective in the field of production and distribution of films among Russian film companies firms and was a real competitor to the branches of leading foreign companies in Russian film business, such as Gaumont and Pathé Brothers. However, the company was unable to fully exploit the opportunities which emerged after the outbreak of the First World War due to the withdrawal of a number of branches of leading foreign companies from the film market. By keeping his firm in the form of a joint-stock company, A. Khanzhonkov actually hindered its development himself by not issuing shares for free sale on the stock exchange. Therefore, the company constantly suffered a lack of investment. This was especially evident after the February Revolution of 1917, when new companies entered the film business, which significantly increased competition in the film market. The attempt to transfer the company’s activities to the Crimea in connection with the construction of a new Yalta film studio was not successful, primarily due to the deterioration of the overall political and economic situation in the country.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Veress, Emõd. "Joint stock companies having the local government as sole shareholder – some practical remarks in the case of Romania." Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne 15, no. 4 (December 10, 2017): 69–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.25167/osap.1233.

Full text

Abstract:

As a general rule, a joint stock company is based on a contract, therefore at least two shareholders are necessary to establish such a business entity. A sole shareholder joint stock company has an exceptional character, because it can be founded only by the state or by the local government. In the Romanian jurisprudence recently several important problems were raised regarding the operation of sole shareholder joint stock companies, therefore a detailed analysis of the court cases dealing with the representation of the interests of the sole shareholder and with judiciary control over the activity of such companies seems pertinent.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Zdanikowski, Paweł Marcin. "Resignation of a shareholder of a simple joint-stock company." Studia Prawnicze KUL, no. 4 (June 11, 2021): 159–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.31743/sp.9224.

Full text

Abstract:

The subject matter of the article is the analysis of the institution of the resignation of a shareholder in a simple joint-stock company. The author considers the introduction of an institution granting a shareholder the right to exit the company as justified. It may form an instrument for the protection of interests of shareholder (usually the minority of them), which on the one hand are marginalized by other shareholders (usually the majority), and on the other hand find it impossible (due to legal or actual grounds) to dispose of their shares, regardless of whether the company does not consent it, or there is no demand for them, due to the situation of the company. The author critically assesses the regulation of the institution of resignation. He believes that it will be ineffective in its current form: first, because of the requirement for the petitioner to sue all the remaining shareholders. Secondly, due to the scope of court cognition, which is too narrow, the current regulation can be effective only if the company voluntarily buys out after losing the case in the resignation proceedings. Otherwise, effective resignation from the company will require an action for a commitment to make a declaration of intent, followed by an action for payment. The article also contains specific suggestions for optimizing this provision.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Ryszkowski, Karol, and Aleksandra Witoszek-Kubicka. "The legitimacy of introducing a simple joint-stock company into the Polish legal order." Ekonomia i Prawo 21, no. 1 (March 31, 2022): 225–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/eip.2022.012.

Full text

Abstract:

Motivation: The paper focuses on the legitimacy of introducing the simple joint-stock company (PSA) into the Polish legal order by referring to the financing of the initial phase of business operations. Describes the issue of capital gap, especially significant for capital-intensive innovative enterprises that have a problem obtaining financing due to high operational risk. The work also shows the importance of choosing capital financing sources due to financial risk and development opportunities. It presents an unconventional solution on raising funds for activities through crowdfunding. The paper attempts to answer questions about the legitimacy of introducing a simple joint-stock company into the Polish legal system and potential benefits and threats from the use of this type of company by startups. Aim: The paper proposes two research aims; verification of the legitimacy of introducing a simple joint-stock company in-to the Polish legal order and presentation of possible impact of the introduction of PSA on the use of crowdfunding as a start-ups financing source. Results: Thanks to the analysis of the acts and the literature on the subject, potential advantages and disadvantages of introducing PSA into the Polish legal system were identified. The authors take the position that combining the features of a limited liability company with a joint stock company may be the legislator’s response to the needs of the startup community.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Gabov, Andrey V. "Losing shares during the transformation of joint stock company into limited liability company." Law Enforcement Review 3, no. 4 (January 16, 2020): 91–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(4).91-104.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Ziegler, Dieter. "«Bankenmacht», «Verwaltungsherrschaft», «Aktionärsdemokratie»?" Zeitschrift für Unternehmensgeschichte 65, no. 1 (March 4, 2020): 33–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zug-2019-0007.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract«Bankenmacht», «Verwaltungsherrschaft», «Aktionärsdemokratie»? On the problem of management control in German stock corporations 1870 to 1931The liberalization of stock company law in Prussia and the North German Confederation respectively as well as the abolition of state concessions as a prerequisite for the formation of a joint-stock company led to a debate about the means of control regarding joint-stock companies. The new stock company law instituted supervisory boards as a controlling body, as a mandatory «contracted general assembly», but did not elaborate on a clear definition of their duties. Yet, since the end of the so called «Gründerboom» in 1873, it became more and more apparent that the supervisory boards failed to provide adequate supervision. The law was amended in 1884 accordingly, in order to increase the supervisory boards’ means of control over the executive board. Subsequently, many joint-stock companies developed an oligarchic power structure, which cut down on shareholder protection rights. Banks were heavily involved in this process due to their voting rights as «inside shareholders», but by no means would it be suitable to label this as «Bankenherrschaft».

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Chugunova, K. Yu. "Features of the Formation of the Will of Joint-Stock Companies Subsidiaries with Predominant State Participation (The Case of Russian Railways)." Actual Problems of Russian Law 15, no. 10 (October 29, 2020): 116–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.119.10.116-124.

Full text

Abstract:

In the paper, the author examines the independence of joint-stock companies subsidiaries with predominant state participation in decision-making through the prism of the practice of building corporate governance at JSC 'Russian Railways'. The author sets the task to study the limits of participation of the main company in the formation of the will of the management bodies of a subsidiary company using the example of one of the largest Russian joint-stock companies with state participation. The author concludes that the parent company has virtually unlimited powers in determining the subsidiary's decisions, which is generated by the broad approach of the legislator to the definition of the subsidiary. For the first time, the paper identifies two independent forms of determining the decisions of a subsidiary by the main company, which are actively used in practice, but without direct consolidation at the legislative level. They are as follows: the direction to the subsidiaries by the main company of draft local regulations subject to approval by the management bodies of the subsidiary; and issuance by the parent company of instructions for voting at the annual general meeting and the meeting of the board of directors of the subsidiary. The author notes that under the conditions of unlimited powers of the parent company when determining the decisions of the subsidiary company there is the risk of transformation of subsidiaries of joint-stock companies with predominant state participation into nominal structures not interested in high-quality corporate governance, blindly fulfilling the will of the parent company. The material presented in the paper can be used both in further scientific research when studying the issue of independence of subsidiaries of joint-stock companies with predominant state participation, and by practicing lawyers working in joint-stock companies with state participation and their subsidiaries, as well as by state bodies participating in the improvement of corporate law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Ermakov, Dmitrii Nikolaevich, and Valeriia Vladimirovna Raizman. "Marketing strategy of public joint stock company «United aircraft corporation»." Interactive science, no. 8 (30) (August 17, 2018): 32–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.21661/r-472780.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Joint stock company'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles