Relevant bibliographies by topics / Judicial ideology

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Judicial ideology'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Judicial ideology.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Judicial ideology"

1

Bonica, Adam, and Maya Sen. "Estimating Judicial Ideology." Journal of Economic Perspectives 35, no. 1 (2021): 97–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.1.97.

Full text
Abstract:
We review the substantial literature on estimating judicial ideology, from the US Supreme Court to the lowest state court. As a way to showcase the strengths and drawbacks of various measures, we further analyze trends in judicial polarization within the US federal courts. Our analysis shows substantial gaps in the ideology of judges appointed by Republican Presidents versus those appointed by Democrats. Similar to trends in Congressional polarization, the increasing gap is mostly driven by a rightward movement by judges appointed by Republicans. We conclude by noting important avenues for future research in the study of the ideology of judges.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Johnston, Christopher D., Maxwell Mak, and Andrew H. Sidman. "On the Measurement of Judicial Ideology." Justice System Journal 37, no. 2 (2015): 169–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2015.1084249.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Varat, Jonathan D., and Richard A. Posner. "Economic Ideology and the Federal Judicial Task." California Law Review 74, no. 2 (1986): 649. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3480326.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Schuck, Peter H. "The New Judicial Ideology of Tort Law." Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science 37, no. 1 (1988): 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1174049.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kodikara, Chulani. "Battered Wives or Dependent Mothers? Negotiating Familial Ideology in Law." Violence Against Women 24, no. 8 (2017): 901–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801217724452.

Full text
Abstract:
More than a decade after its passing, Sri Lanka’s Prevention of Domestic Violence Act (PDVA) remains a remedy of last resort for female survivors of intimate partner violence, as there is little support to take on a rights-defined identity as a battered woman both inside and outside the courtroom. However, large numbers of women are accessing the Maintenance Act of 1999 to exit violent relationships without the censure and stigma that attaches to the PDVA. The key to understanding this phenomenon is to consider how familial ideology works in unpredictable ways within the Sri Lankan judicial system. This article examines the reach and different impacts of familial ideology within the judiciary and argues that female survivors of violence navigate this ideology to their own advantage. However, the preference to address violence through the Maintenance Act renders such violence invisible. The price for judicial redress is silence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Banks, Christopher P. "IDEOLOGY AND JUDICIAL DEFERENCE IN THE D.C. CIRCUIT." Southeastern Political Review 26, no. 4 (2008): 861–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.1998.tb00513.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

EIDELWEIN SILVEIRA, GABRIEL, Denise Regina Quaresma da Silva, Paulo José Libardoni, and Tamires Eidelwein. "Judicial Marxism." International Journal for Innovation Education and Research 8, no. 4 (2020): 527–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss4.2305.

Full text
Abstract:
This article discusses the “judicial marxism”, which was characterized by the actuation of judges who have learned their ideology among student movements and labor unions. Brazilian Labor Justice was created in the 40s, but the true Labor Law charismatic founders were the hyper politicized generation of labor judges, stood out in the 80s and the 90s, when Marxist labor judges held their position, in the field, against the traditional view of a neutral and impartial judge in the Montesquieu style. It’s known that judges who are politically oriented to Marxism produce “garantist” discourses (in Ferrajoli´s sense) when they utter a speech in legal terms (in their opinions), referring to the fundamental labor rights doctrine – which is based on the concept of dignity of work. However, sometimes “labor garantism” and “Marxism” don’t coincide in attitudes of the same labor judges because it’s not necessary that garantist judges have both the humanistic education and the political initiation in their backgrounds. The truth is that Marxism and garantism can live together, once we recognize that the prior is a political and philosophical doctrine, effective only in the political field, but never into the legal field, while the later is a major philosophical theory especially applied to law issues. By the 2000s, elder Marxist judges were challenged by a younger generation of hyper technicist magistrates formed at the benches of the career preparatory courses. By asserting the autonomy of the juridical discourse, rather than the political ideology, these legal positivist judges (in Kelsen´s sense), so called “professional jurists”, partially delegitimized the judicial activism, particularly relevant in Brazilian Labor Courts. Nowadays, Judicial Marxism faces a crisis, losing space to pure garantist and legal positivist judges, although it still holds a formidable aura of legitimacy because it’s the only labor law tradition that deeply justifies the “protective principle”, by assuming the class struggle theory as a main postulate.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Strayhorn, Joshua A. "Competing signals in the judicial hierarchy." Journal of Theoretical Politics 31, no. 3 (2019): 308–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0951629819850626.

Full text
Abstract:
Political principals often face information deficits. This is especially true of the US judicial hierarchy; extant theories of ideological monitoring in this setting have therefore explored informational cues such as lower court ideology or dissent. Canonical models of this setting, however, have omitted litigants, implicity assuming they are not an important source of information. This paper develops a formal model that considers whether litigants can credibly signal information about noncompliance, and how litigants’ signals interact with the cues of ideology and dissent. The model shows that litigant signals can be highly informative about doctrinal compliance, sometimes even crowding out the need for other signals. By contrast, litigants face difficulty communicating information about case importance; dissent, however, can be highly informative on this dimension. Accordingly, some informational cues may only influence limited aspects of the high court’s case selection process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Božič, Tilen Štajnpihler. "Precedent Ideology and Judicial Legitimacy in Slovenia – An Outline." Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 27, no. 1 (2018): 143. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2018.27.1.143.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Urquhart, Ian T. "Federalism, Ideology, and Charter Review: Alberta's Response to Morgentaler." Canadian journal of law and society 4 (1989): 157–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0829320100001575.

Full text
Abstract:
In the inaugural volume of this journal Peter Russell of the Department of Political Science at the University of Toronto noted that the political science community, after nearly fifty years of blindness to judicial power, had begun to regain an appreciation of the courts' political significance. Despite this reawakening, certain legal subjects very germane to political science still tend to be the preserve of legal academics. One such subject is judicial review, more specifically the impact of judicial review upon policy outcomes. To date, arguably the most detailed and valuable commentary on this topic is offered by a legal scholar, Patrick Monahan. InPolitics and the Constitution, Monahan suggests that judicial review is not as universally consequential as we might expect. For him, the instrumental impact of judicial review varies according to whether it is based on the law of federalism or on theCharter of Rights. He believes that, for reasons to be outlined shortly,Charterreview is likely to have a greater substantive impact than federalism review. In this article, I use a discussion of Alberta's reaction to the 1988 decision inMorgentaler, Smoling, and Scott v. The Queento question this conclusion. This decision on abortion provides an excellent example of how federalism may temper the substantive impact ofCharterreview. The reaction of Alberta to the Court's judgement demonstrates how the intergovernmental interdependence typical of Canadian federalism may dilute or at the very least delay the consequences ofCharterreview for policy outcomes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Judicial ideology"

1

Weiden, David Lee. "Judicial decision-making in comparative perspective ideology, law and activism in constitutional courts /." [Austin, Tex. : University of Texas Libraries, 2007. http://www.lib.utexas.edu/etd/d/2007/weidend45079/weidend45079.pdf#page=3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Thomas, Jerry D. "LAW AND IDEOLOGY IN THE U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FEDERAL AGENCY DECISIONS." UKnowledge, 2010. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/115.

Full text
Abstract:
The attitudinal model of judicial behavior dominates judicial politics scholarship, including studies of federal courts and agencies. Extant research finds limited support for legal constraints as determinants of judge behavior when agency decisions are under review. Attitudinal scholars suggest judges substitute their policy preferences in place of agency preferences. Contrarily, the legal model suggests judges defer to agencies because of procedures and doctrine rooted in the rule of law. This study tests hypotheses predicting whether federal agency review decisions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals during 1982-2002 are a function of judges‘ attitudes, namely ideology, or a function of legal constraints, including agency adherence to legally prescribed procedures and agency passing standard-of-review muster. Using logistic regression, I examine the impact of legal and ideological variables on the outcome of judges‘ reviews of agency decisions. Results support several hypotheses. Agency adherence to procedural standards, such as those outlined in the Administrative Procedures Act, increases the likelihood that a review panel will defer to the agency. If review panels and judges answer standard-of-review questions favorably toward agencies, review panels and judges are more likely to support agencies in final case outcomes. Individual judge votes to support agencies are influenced by the ideology of other judges on the review panel: if the ideology of the review panel is in agreement with the agency position, individual judges are more likely to support agencies in final case outcomes. Finally, a judge is more likely to dissent when he/she is in ideological (dis)agreement with the agency position. In sum, results suggest that judges‘ regard for law and regard for their judge colleagues informs decisionmaking. Judges often defer to federal administrative agencies, even when their personal policy preferences are not found to be significantly associated with decisions. Judges‘ ideological preferences appear to be less important in the U.S. Courts of Appeals than previous scholarship indicates, but ideology may influence judges‘ decisions through the ideological composition of the review panel and in dissent behavior. The implication is that the legal model of judicial behavior may be more prominent than the attitudinal model in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Martins, Rodrigo. "Pontos de divergência: Supremo Tribunal Federal e comportamento judicial." Universidade de São Paulo, 2018. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8131/tde-06022019-131330/.

Full text
Abstract:
O Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) é uma das instituições mais importantes do país, e tem recebido cada vez mais atenção da sociedade brasileira. Ano a ano, a corte é acionada para julgar dezenas de milhares de casos, muitos deles com impacto direto na vida econômica, política e social do país. Investigar quais são os fatores que influenciam o comportamento dos ministros do STF é fundamental para compreendermos o processo de tomada de decisões do Tribunal. Apesar de existirem estudos importantes sobre o resultado das ações de controle de constitucionalidade, ainda existe espaço para estudar o comportamento individual dos ministros. O objetivo do presente trabalho é analisar o comportamento individual dos ministros do STF, utilizando-se as votações dos ministros frente às ações de controle de constitucionalidade que foram decididas de forma colegiada. A proposta de trabalho é verificar como os ministros se agrupam e quais fatores influenciam sua divisão. Para isso, propomos a utilização do método de estimação de pontos ideias. Nossa hipótese primária de trabalho é que existe uma influência da indicação presidencial no comportamento dos ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Dessa forma, haveria uma divisão da Corte entre os ministros nomeados por diferentes partidos. A hipótese secundária seria que as trajetórias profissionais dos ministros também influenciam em sua forma de decidir, sendo possível, portanto, identificar divisões entre os ministros a partir desta variável. Os resultados do presente trabalho indicam que variáveis associadas aos modelos atitudinais do comportamento judicial, partidos dos presidentes que indicaram os ministros, ideologia e filosofia judicial dos ministros, são variáveis mais relevantes para explicar as agrupamentos e dissensos no STF do que as que dizem respeito as trajetórias profissionais dos juízes.<br>The Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF (Federal Supreme Court) is one of the most relevant institutions in Brazil, and it has increasingly gained attention from Brazilian society. Year after year, the Court is demanded to rule thousands of cases, a lot of them with direct impact in the countrys economic political and social life. To investigate which factors influence the Justices behavior is paramount to understand the decision-making process of the Court. The goal of this work is to analyze the Justices individual behavior, by looking at the Justices individual vote in Constitutional Review cases that were decided in collegiate manner. This dissertation verifies how the Justices cluster themselves and which factors influence their division. For that, we employ the ideal point estimation method. Our primary hypothesis states that the presidential nomination exerts influence in the Justices behavior. In this way, it would be possible to identify a division in the Court among Justices nominated by different parties. Our secondary hypothesis states that the Justices professional background also exerts influence in how they decide, therefore making possible to identify divisions among Justices by taking this variable as a dividing line. The results of the present work indicate that the variables associated with the attitudinal models of judicial behavior, presidential party responsible for Justice nomination, ideology and Justices judicial philosophy are more relevant variables to explain the clusters and dissensus in STF than variables linked to magistrates professional background.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Nicolson, Donald James. "Ideology in the South African judicial process : activism and restraint in review for abuse of discretion." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1989. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.315011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Craig, McKinzie King Kimi Lynn. "Rubber stamps and litmus tests the president, the senate, and judicial voting behavior in abortion cases in the U.S. federal district courts /." [Denton, Tex.] : University of North Texas, 2007. http://digital.library.unt.edu/permalink/meta-dc-3985.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

SULOCKI, VICTORIA AMALIA DE BARROS CARVALHO GOZDAWA DE. "MUSEUM OF NEWS: DISCOURSES OF THE SOCIAL DEFENSE IDEOLOGY IN THE JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN THIS BEGINNING OF THE XXI CENTURY." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2010. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=18810@1.

Full text
Abstract:
PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO<br>O presente trabalho investiga a hipótese de que o Direito Processual Penal, quando de sua instrumentalização na prática diária dos Tribunais, estaria com sua função, ao menos a declarada, de instrumento de defesa do acusado, suas liberdade e autonomia, e de resolução do conflito penal com vistas à produção da paz e do entendimento, desvirtuada para realização de uma intervenção penal mais gravosa, amparada nas idéias de defesa social e do eficientismo penal, transformando-se assim em mais um aparato de segurança pública de viés autoritário. Trata-se de entender como vem ocorrendo esse desvio, na teoria e na prática do Direito Processual Penal, ao longo destes últimos anos, sobretudo após a constitucionalização dos direitos e garantias do Cidadão e a inserção do Sistema Acusatório na Carta Magna, ou se tal fenômeno apenas explicita as permanências de um Direito Penal que, desde o Iluminismo burguês até os dias de hoje, prega a ideologia da Defesa social, amalgamado a um Direito Processual Penal inquisitorial e autoritário, que resistem às transformações democráticas, aos moldes de que ocorre com a própria sociedade brasileira.<br>This work investigates the hypothesis that Criminal Procedure Law, when instrumentalized in the daily praxis of the courts, would have its function, at least declared, of instrument of the Defendant s defense, liberties and independence, as well as of resolution/settling of the Criminal conflict aiming peace and understanding, distorted for the accomplishment/realization of a more austere/severe Criminal intervention based on the ideals of social defense and criminal efficiency, being transformed in another apparatus of authoritarian public safety. The work consists, then, in understanding how this diversion has been happening over the years in the theory and in the praxis of Criminal Procedure Law, especially after the constitutionalization of citizen s rights and guarantees as well as the insertion of the Accusatorial System in the Brazilian Constitution, or if this phenomenon only clarifies the permanence of a Criminal Law, that since the Enlightenment to the present day preaches the ideology of social defense, combined with an inquisitorial and authoritarian Criminal Procedure Law resists the democracy transformations similarly to what occur with Brazilian society.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Linardi, Rafael da Cruz Gouveia. "Ideologia e Poder Judiciário: um processo histórico de construção de valores." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2017. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20648.

Full text
Abstract:
Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2017-12-07T11:14:12Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Rafael da Cruz Gouveia Linardi.pdf: 1538183 bytes, checksum: 77dd40ae9abacc65fa27facf855253bc (MD5)<br>Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-07T11:14:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rafael da Cruz Gouveia Linardi.pdf: 1538183 bytes, checksum: 77dd40ae9abacc65fa27facf855253bc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-11-21<br>This dissertation examines law from an essentially cultural perspective, that is, as a phenomenon arising from the gradual construction of values in the course of history. Among the sources of law, the study focuses on the so-called judicial source, that is, the right that arises from decisions handed down by judges and courts. It seeks to comprehend the ideologies that serve as a framework for decisions made by judges, within the contemporary panorama. It is assumed that the judicial activity is predominantly interpretative, requires a position, and, consequently, a choice of values. As a starting point, the study shows opinion poll results in which judges were able to voice their considerations on the most relevant aspects. It also reveals that, in general, judges take into consideration in their decisions both the paradigm of legality and concomitantly the social consequences that their sentences may lead to. Considering those paradigms as simultaneously embedded, the study analyzes in greater depth, the foundations of both stances: on one hand the "legalist" and on the other the "social" one. Through a historical approach, it identifies that "legalism" is the result of constant and permanent search of the human being for security and stability. Moreover, it reveals that legalism can also relate to an "ideological legal positivism" Otherwise, the concern with "social consequences of judicial decisions" gains ground, at a time when the rapprochement of law with ethics is sought. Besides, judicial positions strengthen elements of the Marxist critique, unleashing the so-called "judicial activism”. Finally, the study examines recent jurisprudential cases in which it is possible to confirm this ideological dichotomy that is present in the intricacies of the Judicial Power<br>Esta dissertação de mestrado examina o direito sob uma perspectiva essencialmente cultural, o que significa dizer, como um fenômeno decorrente da construção gradual de valores no curso da história. Dentre as fontes do direito, o estudo toma por destaque a denominada fonte judicial, ou seja, o direito que nasce a partir das decisões proferidas por juízes e tribunais. Busca compreender as ideologias que servem de referência para a tomada de decisões pelos magistrados no panorama contemporâneo, partindo-se do pressuposto de que a atividade judicial é preponderantemente interpretativa, a exigir a adoção de posicionamentos, e, por consequência, a escolha de valores. Como ponto de partida para o estudo, aponta resultados de pesquisas de opinião onde os próprios juízes foram ouvidos e puderam se manifestar acerca de assuntos pertinentes. Permite constatar que os juízes levam preponderantemente em consideração, no momento de decidir, o paradigma da legalidade, mas também, de maneira concomitante, as consequências sociais que as suas sentenças podem vir a causar. Considerando-se esta dualidade de paradigmas simultaneamente incorporados, analisa com maior profundidade os fundamentos de ambas as posturas, de um lado a “legalista”, e de outro a “social”. Numa abordagem histórica, detecta que o “legalismo” é fruto da constante e permanente busca do ser humano por segurança e estabilidade. Identifica o legalismo com o que se pode denominar de “positivismo jurídico ideológico”. De outra sorte, a preocupação com as “consequências sociais das decisões judiciais” ganha espaço em um momento em que se busca a reaproximação do direito com a ética, oportunidade em que as posturas judiciais incrementam elementos da crítica marxista, desencadeando o denominado “ativismo judicial”. Por fim, aprecia casos jurisprudenciais recentes onde é possível verificar esta dicotomia ideológica verificada nos meandros do Poder Judiciário
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Craig, McKinzie. "Rubber Stamps and Litmus Tests: The President, the Senate, and Judicial Voting Behavior in Abortion Cases in the U.S. Federal District Courts." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2007. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3985/.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis focuses on how well indicators of judicial ideology and institutional constraints predict whether a judge will vote to increase abortion access. I develop a model that evaluates a judge's decision in an abortion case in light of ideological factors measured at the time of a judge's nomination to the bench and legal and institutional constraints at the time a judge decides a case. I analyze abortion cases from all of the U.S. Federal District Courts from 1973-2004. Unlike previous studies, which demonstrate that the president and the home state senators are the best predictors of judicial ideology, I find that the Senate Judiciary Committee at the time of the judge's nomination is the only statistically significant ideological indicator. Also, contrary to conventional wisdom, Supreme Court precedent (a legal constraint) is also a significant predictor of judicial voting behavior in abortion cases.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lellis, Lélio Maximino. "O texto nos acórdãos dos tribunais." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2008. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/14538.

Full text
Abstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T19:34:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Lelio Maximino Lellis.pdf: 1775869 bytes, checksum: d2738773093341ca5a8b26c14f3712ec (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-10-22<br>The knowledge of attributes of deciding texts of the judicial collective sentence genre (Acórdão genre) and, on this account, with characteristics of the Judiciary, especially those related to enunciative subjectivity, assume the choice of the corpus to be investigated, the configuration of the textual generic system in which the object of study is inserted and the elaboration of the linguistic analysis model to be employed. The corpus, analyzed through the deductive hypothetic method, is composed of six informing texts of definitive collective decision emanated from the Supreme Court of Justice, the High Court of Judicature and from the Court of Appeal of São Paulo. The choice for the Acórdão genre was due to the multiculturalism expressed in them. The system of juridical textual genres is composed of investigative, petitional, opinative and deciding subsystems, to which the Acórdão belongs to. They are originated in the juridical discursive community and correspond to the four linguistics moments of concretization of Law There are three dimensions to the analysis model applicable to Acórdão texts, which can be viewed in a triangle form: 1st the indicative of the linguistic levels (syntactic, semantic, pragmatic); 2nd the outward expression of the local and global ambit of meaningful extent (the posed and the understood); 3rd the one that points at the research prisms (form, content, ideological substrate). Through the application of the interpretative model mentioned above the results show that the Acórdão genre has a peculiar superstructure in which narration and argumentation prevail, in a general sense, even though the dominant functional type is the injunctive. The results also show that in each Acórdão text the macrostructure points at a pronounced decision about the declaration or constitution of pleaded rights by both parties. Moreover, the texts analyzed seem to have an illocutionary force characterized by maximum imperativity which does not admit disobedience by the co-enunciator. Nevertheless, they seem to express devaluation of the enunciator s face, besides refraining from partially achieving the effects of meaning related to enunciative subjectivity and intended by the enunciator, as well as resulting from the ideological substrate derived from ideologies related to judiciary institution in which the enunciator aims to represent. So, even though they are effective to the textuality principles, the acórdão texts, in their current composition, may put at risk the way in which the judiciary wishes to be known in the popular imaginary, such as, in the ideological conditions of fair arbitrator, axiologicaly impartial and neutral in relation to litigants in judiciary process, which may contribute to unstable the reality present in Brazil<br>O conhecimento dos atributos dos textos decisórios do gênero acórdão e, pois, inclusive de características do Judiciário, sobretudo daquelas ligadas à subjetividade enunciativa, pressupõe a escolha do corpus a ser investigado, a configuração do sistema de gêneros textuais em que o objeto do estudo se insere e o estabelecimento do modelo de análise lingüística a ser aplicado. O corpus, pesquisado pelo emprego do método hipotético-dedutivo, é composto por seis textos informadores de decisão coletiva definitiva, emanados aos pares do Supremo Tribunal Federal, do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo, devendo-se a escolha do gênero acórdão para investigação ao multiculturalismo que nele é expressa. O sistema de gêneros textuais jurídicos contém os subsistemas investigativo, peticional, opinativo e decisório ao qual pertence o acórdão. Estes se originam da comunidade discursiva jurídica e correspondem aos quatro momentos lingüísticos de concretização do Direito. O modelo de análise aplicável aos textos de acórdão possui três dimensões, todas elas triangulares: 1ª) a indicativa dos níveis lingüísticos (sintático, semântico, pragmático); 2ª) a exteriorizadora dos âmbitos local e global de alcance significativo, bem como do explícito e implícito co-textual e contextual; 3ª) a que aponta os ângulos de pesquisa (forma de expressão, conteúdo, substrato ideológico). Pela aplicação do mencionado modelo interpretativo verifica-se que o gênero acórdão detém superestrutura peculiar em que preponderam quantitativamente a narração e a argumentação em sentido amplo, ainda que o tipo funcionalmente dominante seja o injuntivo. Igualmente, constata-se que em cada texto de acórdão a macroestrutura aponta a decisão proferida sobre a declaração ou constituição de direitos pleiteados pelas partes. Mais: os textos em destaque possuem força ilocutória caracterizada por máxima imperatividade que não admite desobediência por parte do enunciatário. Todavia, eles exprimem desconsideração ao valor deste, bem como deixam de alcançar, parcialmente, os efeitos de sentido vinculados à subjetividade enunciativa e intentados pelo enunciador, além de ensejados por substrato ideológico derivado de rol de ideologias ligadas à instituição judiciária que o locutor pretende representar. Assim, apesar de eficientes no tocante aos princípios de textualidade, os textos de acórdão, em sua redação atual, colocam em risco a maneira pela qual o Judiciário deseja constar do imaginário popular, a saber, nas condições ideológicas de árbitro justo, imparcial e neutro axiologicamente em relação aos litigantes em processo judicial, o que poderá vir a contribuir para desestabilizar a atual realidade vigente no Brasil
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Lindquist, Andrew. "Can the Priest-Klein Model Explain the Falling Plaintiff Win Rate?" Scholarship @ Claremont, 2019. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2213.

Full text
Abstract:
The Priest-Klein model predicts that a decline in the plaintiff win rate might be explained by a change in stake asymmetry that favors the plaintiff; that is, the stakes for defendants increase. This lowers the plaintiff win rate because defendants increasingly look to settle cases they are less likely to win, leading them to only go to trial with cases they have a comparably higher probability of winning. We theorize a shift like this might have occurred between 1985 and 1995, as Lahav and Siegelman (2017) recently discovered that the plaintiff win rate fell from almost 70% in 1985 to just over 30% in 1995. Although they found that changing judicial caseloads and other factors represented a notable portion of the decline, they were unable to identify what drove the remaining 40%. We hypothesize that this unexplained decline was caused by increasing defendant stakes and examine two potential drivers of increasing stake asymmetry: changing judicial ideology and a rise in the number of Multi-District Litigation (MDL) cases, a type of case with higher defendant stakes. We find evidence consistent with the Priest-Klein model for MDL cases as these cases experienced lower adjudication rates, lower plaintiff win rates, and higher settlement rates. Additionally, we found that judicial ideology was substantially more important for MDL cases, suggesting that judges might make use of their greater influence in these cases to guide outcomes. Yet, while both MDL case status and judicial ideology were statistically significant predictors of plaintiff win rates, we found that neither explains a substantial portion of the decline. Thus, a large proportion of the decline found by Lahav and Siegelman remains a mystery.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Judicial ideology"

1

author, Waterman Richard W., ed. Checking the courts: Law, ideology, and contingent discretion. State University of New York Press, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Political literacy: Rhetoric, ideology, and the possibility of justice. State University of New York Press, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Minda, Gary. Boycott in America: How imagination and ideology shape the legal mind. Southern Illinois University Press, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Shotwell, C. B. When labels fail: Politics, values, and ideology on the Supreme Court. Xlibris Co., 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ideology in the language of judges: How judges practice law, politics, and courtroom control. Oxford University Press, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Albuquerque, Mario Pimentel. O órgão jurisdicional e a sua função: Estudo sobre a ideologia, aspectos críticos e o controle do Poder Judiciário. Malheiros Editores, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

The legal ideology of removal: The southern judiciary and the sovereignty of Native American nations. University of Georgia Press, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Instituto Brasileiro de Ciências Criminais. Decisões judiciais nos crimes de roubo em São Paulo: A lei, o direito e a ideologia. IBCCRIM, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Judicial Selection Merit Ideology and Politics. National Legal Center for the, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Segal, Jeffrey A. Ideology and Partisanship. Edited by Lee Epstein and Stefanie A. Lindquist. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579891.013.2.

Full text
Abstract:
The question of whether partisan or ideological preferences influence judicial decision-making has been the subject of numerous studies. Due to the strong correlation between party and ideology, scholars have often chosen to examine the combined effects of party and ideology. Recently, however, and in spite of the fact that correlation between party and ideology is growing, scholars have begun to investigate the independent effects of party and ideology by studying a unique group of election law cases, where partisan and ideological considerations often conflict. There has also been an emerging interest in identifying the causes behind the increased polarization of the Court. The increased polarized of the Senate is one posited theory.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Judicial ideology"

1

Bailey, Michael A. "Measuring Ideology on the Courts." In Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315691527-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Wróblewski, Jerzy. "The Ideology of Bound Judicial Decision-Making." In Law and Philosophy Library. Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8050-2_12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Wróblewski, Jerzy. "The Ideology of Free Judicial Decision-Making." In Law and Philosophy Library. Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8050-2_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Wróblewski, Jerzy. "The Ideology of Legal and Rational Judicial Decision-Making." In Law and Philosophy Library. Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8050-2_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dumas, Marion. "Detecting Ideology in Judicial Language." In Law as Data. SFI Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.37911/9781947864085.14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Epstein, Lee, Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn, and Jeffrey A. Segal. "Ideology and the Study of Judicial Behavior." In Ideology, Psychology, and Law. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0027.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Yves, Dezalay. "French Judicial Ideology in Working-Class Divorce." In Sexual Divisions and Society. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351042949-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Xu, Xiaoqun. "The Rule of Law, Judicial Independence, and Due Process." In Heaven Has Eyes. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190060046.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 5 examines the continuation of the legal-judicial reform and its achievements and limitations under the Beijing government (1912–1927) and the Guomindang (GMD, or Nationalist Party) government (1927–1949). The Beijing government tried to implement an ambitious reform plan but failed to materialize it completely due to a lack of resources, among other problems. The GMD continued the reform but also instituted practices particular to its ideology of ruling the country through the party, including the invention of political offenses and their punishments through special laws and special courts. The durability of positive reform outcomes in those years is shown in the way the Chinese judiciary functioned in the Japanese-occupied territories during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

McConville, Mike, and Luke Marsh. "The Politics of the Judiciary." In The Myth of Judicial Independence. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198822103.003.0010.

Full text
Abstract:
A foundational theme of this chapter is the refutation of the generalized claim that judges are ‘independent’ and free from political influence. In reconsidering the institutional realities of judicial independence, it contests the views and theories advanced by leading commentators whom have sought to show that judges are ‘political’, not least Professor J A G Griffith in his seminal, The Politics of the Judiciary. Other theorists considered include Alan Paterson, Robert Stevens, David Robertson, and Harry Annison. The chapter critically reviews the strengths and weaknesses of such theories and demonstrates instead how the ‘political’ character of judges may be explicated by empirical data drawn from internal governmental files rather than previously favoured methodologies. Contrary to these widely adopted accounts, this chapter posits that throughout the last century, a cadre of senior judges in criminal cases have been overtly political in a way previously not understood. Senior judges, it is argued, have had a dynamic involvement in building state institutions and state ideology: working in secret with the executive in formulating policing policies, initiating far-reaching change in the political economy of criminal justice, and setting the agenda for successive legislative interventions, underpinned by a state bias, having held back rights for suspects and defendants and commandeered the process of subjugating the Bar.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Devins, Neal, and Lawrence Baum. "Elites, Ideology, and the Rise of the Modern Court." In The Company They Keep. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197539156.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter tracks the period up to 1985, a time when ideology was less relevant to judicial appointments and there was not a well-established conservative legal network. Limited polarization meant that there were liberal Republicans and conservative Democrats. It also meant that presidents paid less attention to ideology when nominating Justices and that Justices responded to elite groups that were not divided along ideological lines. During the New Deal, for example, Democrat and Republican elites backed economic regulation but were sharply split on civil rights and liberties. During the 1950s to 1980s, elite Democrats and Republicans leaned to the left; for this very reason, moderately conservative Justices became increasingly liberal during their tenure on the Court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Judicial ideology"

1

Reshetnikova, I. V., and Y. A. Tsaregorodtseva. "Judicial Reconciliation is a New Direction in the Development of the Ideology of Peaceful Settlement of Disputes." In XVII International Research-to-Practice Conference dedicated to the memory of M.I. Kovalyov (ICK 2020). Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200321.094.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Judicial ideology' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography