Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Jurisdiction ratione temporis

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Jurisdiction ratione temporis'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Jurisdiction ratione temporis.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Jurisdiction ratione temporis"

1

Gattini, Andrea. "Jurisdiction ratione temporis in International Investment Arbitration." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 16, no. 1 (2017): 139–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341345.

Full text

Abstract:

Issues concerning the temporal scope of jurisdiction of international investment arbitration tribunals are attracting increased attention due to recent events, such as the denunciation of the icsid Convention by some states, the denunciation of bilateral investment treaties from which the tribunals draw their jurisdiction, or the provisional application of other treaties concerning investment protection. The solutions offered by most arbitral tribunals are in line with international customary rules on the law of treaties, a point which deserves attention as further proof of the cohesiveness of international investment law with public international law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Djajic, Sanja. "Temporal jurisdiction of international judicial and arbitral courts." Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, no. 135 (2011): 211–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn1135011d.

Full text

Abstract:

Author explores different temporal aspects of jurisdiction of International Court of Justice, European Court for Human Rights and international investment arbitrations. Temporal limitations are two-fold: non-retroactivity of international acts, on one hand, and ratione temporis conditions for each and every international forum, on the other. Despite differences courts tend to conceptualize common elements across the borders of different jurisdictional rules. The rule of non-retroactivity will find its application before different fora, but discrepancies will emerge with respect to concepts of continuous and composite acts which potentially may overcome temporal limitations. This article explores intertemporal rule and non-retroactivity within the meaning of Article 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Articles 13-15 of ILC Articles on State Responsibility.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Heri, Corina. "Enforced Disappearance and the European Court of Human Rights’ ratione temporis Jurisdiction." Journal of International Criminal Justice 12, no. 4 (2014): 751–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqu053.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Bordin, Fernando Lusa. "Procedural Developments at the International Court of Justice." Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 14, no. 2 (2015): 340–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341297.

Full text

Abstract:

The present column covers procedural developments at the International Court of Justice in the period spanning from 1 June 2014 to 30 June 2015. These include: the scope of the Court’s jurisdiction ratione temporis under a compromissory clause in the context of State succession; the admissibility of new arguments presented during oral hearings; the burden, standard and methods of proof in cases involving State responsibility for international crimes; and revocation of provisional measures in light of a change in the situation that warranted them.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Alexandrov, Stanimir. "The "Baby Boom" of Treaty-Based Arbitrations and the Jurisdiction of ICSID Tribunals: Shareholders as "Investors" and Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 4, no. 1 (2005): 19–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1571803053498853.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Buyse, Antoine. "A Lifeline in Time – Non-retroactivity and Continuing Violations under the ECHR." Nordic Journal of International Law 75, no. 1 (2006): 63–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181006778530803.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe protective shield of a human rights treaty in principle only works once it has entered into force. But what about the frequent problem of human rights violations that occurred or started before that time; can one complain about those on the international level? In other words, what are the limitations of the ratione temporis jurisdiction of supervisory human rights mechanisms? This article explores this question in the context of general public international law through a case study of the European Convention on Human Rights. It argues that the European case law's variations on principles of international law can be explained by the special nature of human rights treaties.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

AKHAVAN, PAYAM. "Balkanizing Jurisdiction: Reflections on Article IX of the Genocide Convention in Croatia v. Serbia." Leiden Journal of International Law 28, no. 4 (2015): 893–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156515000473.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractWhen it first encountered the Genocide Convention in its 1951 Advisory Opinion, the International Court of Justice recognized that the treaty reflected the ‘most elementary principles of morality’. Its provisions were to be read broadly, in light of the Convention's transcendent object and purpose. This expansive approach stands in contrast with the narrow interpretation of Article IX in the recent Judgment in Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia) case. This article is a commentary on the retroactive obligation to punish genocide under the Convention with regard to acts occurring prior to its entry into force for that state. It concludes that the Court's narrow interpretation of its jurisdiction ratione temporis raises wider questions for its contemporary jurisprudence, namely, whether it will interpret human rights treaties enshrining fundamental values any differently than other international instruments.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Zhao, Chunlei. "Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis in Successive International Investment Agreements: What Can Chinese Investors Learn from the Ping An Case?" China and WTO Review 3, no. 1 (2017): 61–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.14330/cwr.2017.3.1.03.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Bjorge, E. "Right for the Wrong Reasons: Silih v Slovenia and Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis in the European Court of Human Rights." British Yearbook of International Law 83, no. 1 (2013): 115–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bybil/brt001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Augusto, Antônio, and Cançado Trindade. "Enforced Disappearances of Persons as a Violation of Jus Cogens: The Contribution of the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights." Nordic Journal of International Law 81, no. 4 (2012): 507–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08104005.

Full text

Abstract:

The consolidation of the international regime of absolute prohibitions (belonging to the domain of jus cogens) of torture, summary and extra-legal executions, and enforced disappearances of persons has counted on the contribution of the case-law of contemporary international tribunals, such as, notably, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR). The jurisprudential construction of the IACtHR to this effect has taken place mainly in the period 1999–2004. The IACtHR began by addressing issues pertaining to its competence ratione temporis, duly distinguishing their bearing on responsibility and jurisdiction. The IACtHR singled out the aggravating circumstances surrounding enforced disappearances of persons, bringing about the enlargement of the notion of victim (comprising the next of kin). The IACtHR duly acknowledged and asserted the absolute prohibitions of jus cogens in the conformation of an international legal regime against grave violations of human rights and international humanitarian law (such as enforced disappearances of persons). The IACtHR became the first contemporary international tribunal, in this connection, to sustain that the enlarged material content of jus cogens encompasses nowadays the victims’ right of access to justice lato sensu, properly understood as the imperative of the realisation of objective or material justice.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Jurisdiction ratione temporis"

1

Laval, Pierre-François. "La compétence ratione temporis des juridictions internationales." Thesis, Bordeaux 4, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011BOR40030.

Full text

Abstract:

La « compétence ratione temporis » est une expression d’origine jurisprudentielle dont la signification varie selon le contexte dans lequel elle se trouve employée. Telle qu’elle apparaît dans les décisions des juridictions internationales, celle-ci désigne d’abord la durée de l’habilitation à exercer le pouvoir juridictionnel que l’on associe à la durée de validité de l’engagement juridictionnel de l’Etat. La compétence temporelle désigne également le domaine temporel d’exercice du pouvoir de juger, les Etats précisant bien souvent les catégories de litiges ratione temporis pour lesquels ils peuvent être attraits en justice. Sur la base de ce constat, la doctrine ne voit dans la compétence temporelle qu’une notion à contenu variable sans véritable utilité pour l’analyse du droit positif, et préfère parler soit de compétence personnelle dès lors qu’est en cause l’existence du consentement de l’Etat à se soumettre à la juridiction, soit de compétence matérielle pour envisager les catégories de différends dont le tribunal pourra connaître. L’étude de la jurisprudence internationale conduit toutefois à remettre en cause le bien-fondé d’une telle analyse. Si l’on peut voir dans la compétence temporelle un élément d’identification de la sphère de compétence du tribunal, et donc un aspect de sa compétence matérielle, la résolution pratique du problème de la durée de l’habilitation à juger ne peut être comprise en ayant recours au concept de compétence personnelle. Par la manière dont les juridictions appliquent l’engagement juridictionnel ratione temporis, celui-ci n’apparaît pas simplement comme l’acte par lequel les Etats consentent à se soumettre à la juridiction, mais d’abord comme le titre qui fonde l’action des justiciables. En cela, l’explication des solutions retenues par les juridictions internationales ne peut faire l’économie d’un concept propre à la durée de l’habilitation : celui de compétence ratione temporis<br>"Jurisdiction ratione temporis" is an expression that derives from case law, the meaning of which varies depending on the context it is used in. As it appears in International court decisions, it is used to mean the time during which the court has the authority to exercise jurisdictional power which also relates to the time during which the State’s consent to jurisdiction is valid. Jurisdiction ratione temporis also means the time period during which the court has the power to judge as the States often specify categories of disputes for which they can be brought to justice as ratione temporis. On this basis, legal doctrine only sees temporal jurisdiction as a variable notion that is not particularly useful in analysing positive law, and prefers to refer to either jurisdiction ratione personae when there is an issue of whether the State has agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the court, or to jurisdiction ratione materiae for categories of disputes for which a court could have jurisdiction. Studies on International case law however call into question the justification of such an analysis. If we can consider that in temporal jurisdiction there is an element of identifying the jurisdictional sphere of the court and therefore an aspect of its jurisdiction ratione materiae, the problem of the time during which a court has jurisdiction cannot be practically solved by referring to the concept of jurisdiction ratione personae. Given the way in which courts apply the title of jurisdiction ratione temporis, this does not appear to be just an act by which the States agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the court but first of all as the very basis of the action. In this, the explanations of the solutions of the International courts cannot ignore a concept that is specific to the duration of authorisation, that of jurisdiction ratione temporis

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Omoruyi, Aisosa Jennifer. "Forced sterilisation as a continuing violation of human rights in Africa: Possibilities and challenges." University of the Western Cape, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/8124.

Full text

Abstract:

Doctor Legum - LLD<br>International standards recognise the basic right of all women and girls to make free choices about reproduction including the number if any, spacing and timing of their children without being subjected to discrimination, coercion, or violence. The enjoyment of this right by many women in the world has overtime been interfered with through forced sterilisation which has a salient history beginning with the eugenics movement in the 20th century indicating a disproportionate impact on the poor, ethnic minorities, women with disabilities, transgender group, as well as women living with HIV.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Jurisdiction ratione temporis"

1

William A, Schabas. Part 2 Jurisdiction, Admissibility, and Applicable Law: Compétence, Recevabilité, Et Droit Applicable, Art.11 Jurisdiction ratione temporis /Compétence ratione temporis. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198739777.003.0014.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter comments on Article 11 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Article 11 states that the Court only has jurisdiction over crimes committed since its entry into force, that is, since July 1, 2002. Article 11(1) is related to articles 22 and 24, both of which also contemplate the temporal application of the Statute. In particular article 24(1), which specifies that ‘No person shall be criminally responsible under this Statute for conduct prior to the entry into force of the Statute’, essentially restates the norm expressed in article 11(1), although from the standpoint of individual criminal responsibility rather than jurisdiction ratione temporis. In the case of States that become party to the Statute subsequent to July 1, 2002, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction with respect to crimes committed since the date of entry into force for that State.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Nick, Gallus. 1 Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198791676.003.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

This introductory chapter presents a brief overview on the temporal jurisdiction of international tribunals, as well as the aims and structure of this volume. The period of an international tribunal’s temporal jurisdiction (jurisdiction ratione temporis) is the span of time during which an act must have occurred before the tribunal may consider if the act breached an international obligation. Together with subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and territorial jurisdiction, the temporal jurisdiction of an international tribunal delineates its powers. Despite its importance, however, the temporal jurisdiction of international tribunals is not well understood. No work has comprehensively addressed the different limits on a tribunal’s temporal jurisdiction and how these limits interact. This chapter shows how the rest of this volume seeks, first, to reduce confusion by clarifying the different limits on the temporal jurisdiction of international tribunals, and the important distinctions between those limits and, secondly, to determine the extent to which tribunals created under different treaties have exercised their discretion over temporal jurisdiction in common ways.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Annabelle, Möckesch. Part 1 Comparative Overview of Concepts of Attorney–Client Privilege, 6 Comparison—Similarities and Differences in the Laws on Attorney–Client Privilege. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198795865.003.0006.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter compares the attorney–client privilege laws set out in the previous chapters. More specifically, it compares the following main features of the privilege: its purpose and rationale, its invocation, its scope (ratione personae, ratione materiae, and ratione temporis), exceptions to it, waiver of it, and work–product protection. It thereby identifies similarities and differences between the privilege laws in the reviewed jurisdictions and, in addition, examines the reasons for such differences.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Jurisdiction ratione temporis"

1

Kang, Sungjin. "Jurisdictional Objections and Defenses (Ratione Personae, Ratione Materiae, and Ratione Temporis)." In Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy. Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5744-2_67-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kang, Sungjin. "Jurisdictional Objections and Defenses (Ratione Personae, Ratione Materiae, and Ratione Temporis)." In Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy. Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3615-7_67.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Baumgartner, Jorun. "Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis." In Treaty Shopping in International Investment Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198787112.003.0007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Badar, Mohamed Elewa, and Rod Rastan. "Article 11. Jurisdiction ratione temporis." In The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Nomos, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845263571-658.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

"Jurisdiction ratione temporis in International Investment Arbitration." In General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration. Brill | Nijhoff, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004368385_007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Bjorge, Eirik. "Evolutionary Interpretation, Or Not? Evolutionary Interpretation and Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis." In The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716143.003.0005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!