Relevant bibliographies by topics / Jurisdictional disputes

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Jurisdictional disputes'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 4 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Jurisdictional disputes.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Jurisdictional disputes"

1

Zhou, Xin, and Junyu Lan. "Investigation Report on Jurisdiction of Online Shopping Contract Disputes." Asian Journal of Social Science Studies 7, no. 4 (April 14, 2022): 134. http://dx.doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v7i4.1108.

Full text
Abstract:
With the continuous expansion of the market scale of online shopping, the contradiction between merchants, platforms and consumers has gradually become prominent, which is manifested in the increasing number of online shopping disputes in the courts. The determination of jurisdiction is the starting link before the dispute enters the litigation, which involves the orderly conduct of civil litigation and is related to the interests of the parties. This paper attempts to analyze the causes of the jurisdictional issues of online shopping contract disputes through the investigation of the jurisdictional decisions, explore the shortcomings of existing jurisdictional provisions in online shopping contract disputes, improve the jurisdictional system of online shopping contract disputes, and explore possible legal optimization paths, so as to provide theoretical support for legislation and justice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Nguyen, Lan Ngoc. "Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the Settlement of Marine Environmental Disputes under UNCLOS." Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 9, no. 2 (December 7, 2021): 337–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22134484-12340161.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Part XII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on the protection and preservation of the marine environment contains provisions that are worded in a general manner. As “the problems of ocean space are closely interrelated and need to be considered as a whole”, these provisions need to be interpreted in harmony with the wider corpus of international law. However, when marine environmental disputes are brought before the UNCLOS dispute settlement bodies, their jurisdiction is limited to disputes arising under UNCLOS. The tribunals, therefore, have to navigate between deciding disputes in a hollistic manner and remaining within their jurisdictional limits. This article discusses the techniques used by UNCLOS tribunals to resort to other sources of international law when settling marine environmental disputes. It will then assess whether, in doing so, the tribunals have remained within their jurisdictional parameters and the wider implications of this practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Yip, Man. "THE RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES BEFORE THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 65, no. 2 (March 17, 2016): 439–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589316000051.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe jurisdictional framework of the Singapore courts has become more nuanced with the establishment of the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) on 5 January 2015 and the signing of the Hague Convention on the Choice of Court Agreements 2005 (Hague Convention) on 25 March 2015. Although the Hague Convention has yet to be incorporated in domestic law, it is expected this will happen in the near future. The SICC project, on the other hand, is part of Singapore's strategy to promote the jurisdiction as an international dispute resolution hub. In essence, the SICC is a domestic specialist court established to deal with international commercial litigation. Adapted from the arbitral model but underpinned by judicial control, central to the SICC framework are party autonomy and flexible procedural rules. The Hague Convention complements the SICC project by increasing the number of jurisdictions in which Singapore judgments will be recognized and enforced. These 2015 developments—key to establishing Singapore as the regional hub for dispute resolution—requires careful working out and an evaluation is needed of the jurisdictional regime that applies to the SICC and the internal allocation of jurisdiction as between the SICC and the Singapore High Court sans the SICC, as well as the impact of the Hague Convention. This article focuses on explaining the in personam jurisdictional rules of the Singapore High Court that now includes the SICC division. Its chief objective is to offer the international community an overview of the working framework of Singapore's version of an ‘international’ commercial court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

PROULX, VINCENT-JOËL. "The World Court's Jurisdictional Formalism and its Lost Market Share: The Marshall Islands Decisions and the Quest for a Suitable Dispute Settlement Forum for Multilateral Disputes." Leiden Journal of International Law 30, no. 4 (September 4, 2017): 925–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156517000401.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractOn 5 October 2016, the International Court of Justice (ICJ, the Court) rendered three judgments declining to take jurisdiction in the Marshall Islands cases, in which that state alleged that India, Pakistan, and the United Kingdom violated their nuclear disarmament obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and customary international law. In declining to take jurisdiction, the Court further confirmed its recent shift to jurisdictional formalism, initiated in Georgia v. Russia and confirmed in both Belgium v. Senegal and the Alleged Violations (Nicaragua v. Colombia) judgment. What is more, the Court heightened the burden of proving the existence of a dispute by incorporating an ‘objective awareness’ requirement in its analysis. The present contribution critically situates the Court's judgments within the context of the law of state responsibility and global security, with particular emphasis on the broader implications going forward. It first explores the principal features of the Court's formalistic shift on jurisdictional matters in the cases, setting the stage for the subsequent discussion. The article then turns to the broader implications of these decisions for state responsibility, taking into consideration that the ‘disputes’ submitted to the Court are not strictly bilateral in nature. My ambition is also to highlight the nexus between jurisdictional issues, state responsibility law, and broader questions of access to justice in multilateral disputes. By way of conclusion, the article highlights the importance of identifying creative solutions in a post-Marshall Islands world, suggesting the UN General Assembly as a law-making facilitator and the UN Security Council as an alternate – albeit imperfect – dispute settlement forum to tackle multilateral disputes with global security implications.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hill-Cawthorne, Lawrence. "INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION AND THE DISAGGREGATION OF DISPUTES: UKRAINE/RUSSIA AS A CASE STUDY." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 68, no. 04 (October 2019): 779–815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589319000411.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis article explores the phenomenon of ‘disaggregation’ of disputes in international law, that is, the carving up of broader disputes into discrete legal claims based on different international legal rules and subject to the jurisdiction of different international tribunals. In particular, its focus is on certain under-explored consequences of this phenomenon for the jurisdiction of international tribunals, asking whether the relationship between the specific claims and the broader dispute might affect the jurisdiction of the tribunals. Employing the ongoing Ukraine/Russia dispute, which has yielded multiple claims before different international tribunals, the article offers an original analysis of these jurisdictional questions. It presents three approaches discernible from case law where tribunals face claims over which they appear to have jurisdiction that implicate a broader dispute over which they do not. The article ends with a consideration of possible explanations for why a tribunal might follow one approach over the others in any given case.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Buga, Irina. "Territorial Sovereignty Issues in Maritime Disputes: A Jurisdictional Dilemma for Law of the Sea Tribunals." International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 27, no. 1 (2012): 59–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180812x615113.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract It is unclear whether Law of the Sea tribunals under the Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC, or the Convention) have jurisdiction to determine maritime boundary disputes involving concurrent land sovereignty issues. The text of the Convention and case law are silent in this respect. The only reference is in LOSC Article 298(1)(a)(i), which allows States to make declarations exempting maritime delimitations from compulsory dispute settlement, excluding concurrent territorial questions even from conciliation. However, it leaves unclear whether concurrent land sovereignty issues are also excluded in the absence of such declarations. There are indications that LOS tribunals may be able to decide ancillary land issues so long as these do not constitute the ‘very subject-matter’ of the dispute, or rely on an alternative jurisdictional basis. The question of competence over mixed disputes may be less extensive in effect than is often believed. States should not avoid initiating proceedings based on the view that LOS tribunals might not ultimately exercise jurisdiction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Agbonika, John Alewo Musa, and Josephine A. A. Agbonika San. "Appraisal of the Jurisdictional Issues Confronting Prosecutors of Tax Related Disputes and Constitutional Bottlenecks." American Journal of Law 5, no. 1 (January 2, 2023): 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.47672/ajl.1309.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose: This paper examines the jurisdictional issues confronting tax enforcements, prosecution and other related issues. Jurisdiction over taxes administered at both the federal and state levels is determined by the legal personality of the taxpayer and place of residence for individuals. The Federal High Court, State High Courts and Tax Appeal Tribunal are vested with jurisdiction to hear and determine tax disputes. The Tax Appeal Tribunal is vested with jurisdiction to hear disputes arising from the operations of the Federal Inland Revenue Service. Tax disputes can be commenced either by the taxpayer or by the relevant tax authority. In practice, administrative channels within the relevant tax authority are usually the first step for resolution of tax disputes. Unresolved disputes proceed to the Tax Appeal Tribunal or Federal High Court, or where the tax is a State tax, to the State high court. The doctrinal research was used in carrying out this research. Methodology: Both secondary and primary sourced materials such as textbooks, journals, internets, case laws etc. were used. Finding: Finding reveals that there have been jurisdictional controversies confronting the constitutionality of TAT decision as well as the regular courts causing serious bottleneck for tax prosecutors. Recommendation: It is recommended that in order to ensure tax compliance, effective resolution of tax disputes and proper administration of tax system, the issue of jurisdiction must be clearly spelt out.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Soon, Joel. "Jurisdictional Conflict Between the World Trade Organization and Regional Trade Agreements: Res Judicata Revisited." Journal of World Trade 56, Issue 6 (December 1, 2022): 899–914. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/trad2022037.

Full text
Abstract:
This article discusses the long-standing issue of jurisdictional conflict in World Trade Organisation (WTO) jurisprudence, which has, in the recent decades, been exacerbated by the proliferation of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs). An examination of WTO jurisprudence reveals that jurisdictional conflict stems from the lack of choice of forum clauses in WTO-covered agreements, and the lack of a hierarchy of sources in international law. While there exists legal basis for the application of general principles of international law such as res judicata, a careful analysis demonstrates that there is conceptual difficulty applying the doctrine in the context of WTO disputes. To remedy this, the article argues that the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) could be amended to allow for the operation of res judicata. WTO, res judicata, jurisdiction conflict, regional trade agreements, general principles of law, Dispute Settlement Understanding
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Furner, Courtney, Nadine Lederer, and Claire Sergaki. "The WTO’s Exclusive and Compulsory Jurisdiction v.Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements: A Clash of Jurisdiction?" Global Trade and Customs Journal 15, Issue 1 (January 1, 2020): 24–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2020005.

Full text
Abstract:
Recently, the number of regional trade agreements (RTAs) has flourished and at the same time, trade disputes are increasing. The dispute settlement mechanisms (DSMs) in those RTAs may be potentially at odds with the DSM of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU). The interaction between the DSMs of the WTO and in RTAs raise various concerns, including forum shopping and conflicts of jurisdiction. The key question is: which DSM should prevail? The relationship between the DSU and the default DSM in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) provides an example of such an interaction and illustrates the potential fragmentation in case of overlapping jurisdiction. In the Mexico – Tax Measures on Soft Drinks and Other Beverages case, the WTO’s Appellate Body was reluctant to adopt a straightforward position on such overlaps. Thus, at least for now, there are many open questions, but no clear-cut answers. After providing an overview of the legal framework and discussing this important case, the authors propose solutions as to how to deal with jurisdictional overlaps in trade disputes. World Trade Organization (WTO), Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), Mexico – Soft Drinks, regional trade agreements (RTA), North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), dispute settlement mechanisms, jurisdiction, proliferation, multiplication, international courts and tribunals
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Guilhardi, Pedro. "Jurisdiction of National Courts for Interim Reliefs in Aid of Foreign Arbitral Proceedings: a Proposed Solution under the New York Convention." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 9, Issue 36 (December 1, 2012): 56–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2012063.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT: The paper discusses the change of view in what concerns the jurisdiction of national courts to entertain requests of interim reliefs in aid of foreign arbitral proceedings. In the past, national courts would assert jurisdiction only after the relevant cause of action had been established to fall strictly within its jurisdictional scope. The simple fact that a case would relate, prima facie, to assets or evidence located, territorially, within the jurisdictional reach of a given court would not suffice to establish said court's jurisdiction over the request. In current practice, the seat of arbitration proceedings is often established in view of the perceived neutrality of the lieu. However, more often than not, the relevant parties, assets and evidence are located elsewhere. Against this background, national courts (following the lead of a 1979 precedent of the House of Lords, United Kingdom), have sought to avail themselves of a more lenient jurisdictional standard, to assert jurisdiction in exceptional circumstances. In several jurisdictions, new legislation has even been adopted in order to meet the current adjudicative needs of disputes relating to international commerce and trade, a change of approach that will be discussed by this paper. Moreover, this paper seeks to determine how desirable the developing paradigm actually is, so as to ultimately propose how its implementation could be carried out in different jurisdictions within the framework of the New York Convention, and without the need of necessarily amending legislation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Jurisdictional disputes"

1

Abdalall, Sherif. "Concurrent delay analysis in public works construction disputes : a cross-jurisdictional study of Egypt, Scotland and England." Thesis, University of Strathclyde, 2017. http://digitool.lib.strath.ac.uk:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=28663.

Full text
Abstract:
For “Concurrent Delay” dispute in construction projects, within what is called the Malmaison approach, English court allow the contractor to gain time but no monetary compensation. Following the issue of the judgment of the City Inn case in 2007 in Scotland which departed from the English approach to the apportionment approach for the monetary consequences, an argument on “Concurrent Delay” in construction projects has started. Few writers have commented giving their opinion based on common law grounds. The question can be: should we have different remedies for the same situation in a cross jurisdiction industry like construction industry which has nearly the same characteristics anywhere. When we take the matter to a larger comparative study, the civilian law logic should be brought to the argument on how to deal with “Concurrent Delay”. There is a notion of differentiation between private contracts and public contracts in most of the civil law countries. Egypt is a developed example of this. When we examine this notion of differentiation with the possible approaches of the “Concurrent Delay” we may add other philosophical and practical perspective to the matter of “Concurrent Delay”. In view of that issue, the author identifies the notion of the differentiation between the private contracts and the public contracts within the context of public works construction disputes. The author also aims to explore the matter of concurrent delay from its two angles which are the legal perspective and the construction management perspective to identify the concurrent delay issue. The research aims to identify the related matters to the issue of concurrent delay and to test an appropriate regulatory framework for concurrent delay within the civilian law context and in common law context. The main findings of the research can be summarized that, within modern construction industry, a unified fair and reasonable advocated resolution or remedy can be developed to be applicable in different jurisdictions as long as the characteristics and the nature of the dispute are nearly the same. These findings will help to support the process of developing a theoretical regulatory framework that will be used as a guide to develop the way we theoretically and practically deal with concurrent delay dispute. One of the aims of this research is to develop the research area of construction law in Egypt.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Castro, de Figueiredo Roberto. "The contribution of foreign investments to the economic development of host states as a jurisdictional requirement under the ICSID Convention." Thesis, Queen Mary, University of London, 2012. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/8376.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis addresses the problem concerning the contribution of foreign investments to the economic development of the host State as a jurisdictional requirement under the Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (“ICSID Convention”). The ICSID Convention governs the jurisdiction of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes for the institution of arbitral proceedings between Contracting States and nationals of other Contracting States. While the institution of arbitral proceedings under the ICSID Convention is contingent upon the consent of the disputing parties, the jurisdiction of the Centre is limited to disputes that fulfill certain requirements. One of the core requirements of the jurisdiction of the Centre is that the dispute must arise out of an investment. Although the ICSID Convention lacks a definition of investment, most arbitral tribunals that had to define the function and content of the investment requirement concluded that the ICSID Convention contains a notion of investment that may not be waived by the consent of the disputing parties. The majority of these decisions considered that the contribution to the economic development of the host State would be one of the elements of such notion of investment. According to these decisions, the economic development requirement, as an element of the investment requirement of the ICSID Convention, could be inferred from the wording of the first recital of the Preamble of the ICSID Convention, which states that the ICSID Convention was concluded considering the role of private international investments in the economic development. It is submitted in this thesis, however, that these decisions were based on a misapplication of the general rule of treaty interpretation of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which codified the existing customary international law rule of treaty interpretation, given that they ignore the ordinary meaning of the term “investment” as employed in the ICSID Convention. The general rule of treaty interpretation of the Vienna Convention establishes a method by which each source of the intention of the parties to the treaty plays a relevant role. Above all, treaty interpretation must be based on the text of the treaty, which must be interpreted in accordance with the ordinary meaning of its terms. The use of the object and purpose of a treaty is a second step and may not be relied on in order to contradict the ordinary meaning of the terms employed in the treaty and to confer a special meaning on them.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Legris, Emilie. "Le tiers dans le contentieux international." Thesis, Université Côte d'Azur (ComUE), 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018AZUR0035.

Full text
Abstract:
La réflexion sur le tiers dans le contentieux international a pour origine le constat d’une présence accrue des tiers dans le cadre du règlement juridictionnel des différends internationaux, questionnant la vision traditionnelle du procès international comme étant « la chose des parties ». Le tiers est défini négativement, comme toute entité qui n’est ni l’organe juridictionnel, ni les parties à l’instance. Tout au long de l’étude, il est procédé à une identification plus précise de cette notion à géométrie variable : selon la juridiction considérée et le type de procédure examiné, le tiers est un Etat, une organisation internationale, une personne privée physique ou morale. Dans le cadre d’un corpus de juridictions varié, la place du tiers dans le contentieux international est étudiée, en examinant successivement les aspects relevant de sa protection et de sa participation dans le contentieux international. En filigrane, l’étude appréhende la contribution des tiers au maintien de la paix, dans le cadre du règlement pacifique juridictionnel des différends internationaux
The reflection on third entities in international litigation comes from the finding of an increased presence of “thirds” in the jurisdictional settlement of international disputes, thus questioning the traditional vision of the international trial as being “the thing of the parties”. The “third” is defined negatively, as any entity that is neither the jurisdiction nor the parties to the proceedings. Throughout the study, a more precise identification of this notion is developed : depending on the jurisdiction in question and the type of procedure examined, third entities are either States, international organizations, private (physical or moral) persons. Within the framework of diverse jurisdictions, the study apprehends the place given to third entities in international litigation, examining successively their protection and their participation. In the background, the study looks at the contribution of third entities to peacekeeping, as part of the peaceful settlement of disputes
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kennett, Wendy A. "Jurisdiction in commercial disputes : a comparison of European and United States approaches." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1991. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.385352.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Farah, Youseph Anton. "Jurisdiction over disputes relating to electronic transactions : a comparative study of European Union and United States laws." Thesis, University of Essex, 2006. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.428899.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Irimia, Florin. "Le contentieux précontractuel des marchés publics en France et en Roumanie." Thesis, Paris 2, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020077.

Full text
Abstract:
Le contentieux précontractuel des marchés publics en France et en Roumanie est une étude comparative qui a comme objet l’analyse synthétique et pragmatique des mécanismes nationaux français et roumains destinés à assurer la protection des opérateurs économiques contre les éventuels manquements aux principes de transparence et de mise en concurrence. La comparaison des deux ordres juridiques est initiée à partir de la présentation du droit européen du contentieux des marchés publics qui a influencé de manière substantielle les systèmes juridiques nationaux. Cette influence sera le point central de l’étude et elle facilitera une comparaison indirecte entre le droit français et le droit roumain qui ont réagi de façon similaire et différente à la fois face à la primauté du droit européen. Ainsi, forte de sa tradition historique en matière de contentieux administratif, la France a été plus réticente à intégrer les règles européennes et a dû accepter quelques compromis qui ont sensiblement bouleversé ses coutumes, notamment en ce qui concerne les pouvoirs du juge. Le système juridique roumain, plus jeune et moins encré dans des règles traditionnelles, a été plus ouvert aux attraits du droit européen à tel point qu’il a innové en créant un organisme administratif-juridictionnel spécialisé, plus adapté aux exigences de rapidité et d’efficacité imposées par les directives européennes. L’évolution de sa jurisprudence riche mais changeante et sa comparaison avec la jurisprudence du juge administratif français nous permettra de nous interroger sur le compromis nécessaire entre la légalité et la sécurité juridique dans la passation des marchés publics
The precontractual disputes within the public procurement procedures in France and Romania represents a comparative study whose object is to synthetically and pragmatically analyse the national French and Romanian mechanisms aimed to ensure the protection of the economic operators against the eventual infringements of the transparency and competition principles. The comparison between the two legislative frameworks is initiated by the presentation of the European law of the disputes within the public procurement procedures, which significantly influenced the national legal systems. This influence shall be the study’s central point, which shall facilitate an indirect comparison between the French and Romanian law that have both similarly and differently reacted to the priority of the European law.Thus, based on its powerful historical tradition in the field of the disputes of the public procurement law, France was more reluctant to integrate the European rules and had to admit some compromise which had sensibly disturbed its tradition, especially with respect to the powers of the judge.The Romanian legal system, younger and less pegged in the traditional rules, was more opened to the attractions of the European law to such a point that it innovated by creating a specialised administrative-jurisdictional organism, more adapted to the celerity and efficiency exigencies imposed by the European Directives. The evolution of its jurisprudence, rich but inconstant and its comparison to the jurisprudence of the French administrative judge will allow an interrogation of the necessary compromise between the legalism and the legal security in the awarding of the public contracts procedures
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Dinelli, Albert. "Agreements on choice of jurisdiction and choice of law : the quest for certainty in the resolution of disputes." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.496440.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Connolly, Rebecca Leanne. "The fragmentation of international law has given rise to a conflict of jurisdiction for trade disputes involving agricultural biotechnology products." Thesis, The University of Sydney, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/13744.

Full text
Abstract:
The proliferation of international agreements has raised the challenge of resolving disputes that simultaneously fall under different specialised regimes within international law. The emergence of specialised regimes, and the establishment of independent judicial institutions to oversee them, has contributed to the ‘fragmentation’ of international law. Furthermore, recent agreements negotiated within a particular specialised regime have included provisions that address subject matters outside of their ‘specialised’ mandate. The potential for jurisdictional conflict is seen in the tension between the international environmental and trade regimes, where environmental agreements have increasingly included trade-related measures that operate outside of the World Trade Organization framework. Agricultural biotechnology provides a pertinent example following the negotiation of the Cartagena Biosafety Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity to govern the trans-boundary movement of living modified organisms. This thesis explores the potential for overlapping jurisdiction between the specialised regimes of international environmental and trade law, with a particular focus on trade disputes involving agricultural biotechnology. This thesis initially considers the concept of fragmentation of international law and the consequences of the proliferation of judicial institutions. Next, the historical development of international environmental law and international trade law is explored, which has laid the foundation for potential parallel dispute proceedings before multiple judicial institutions. The thesis then analyses the principles of conflict of jurisdiction that may assist to resolve these disputes, and applies them to the case study of trade disputes involving agricultural biotechnology. The thesis concludes by considering the options available for addressing conflict of jurisdiction between the international trade and international environmental law regimes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ambeu, Akoua Viviane Patricia. "La fonction administrative contentieuse en Côte d'Ivoire." Thesis, Lyon 3, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011LYO30048/document.

Full text
Abstract:
D’une manière générale, la fonction administrative contentieuse peut être appréhendée comme l’ensemble des juridictions chargées de connaître des litiges résultant de l’activité des autorités administratives. Elle represente l’activité juridictionnelle en matière administrative. Par conséquent, la fonction administrative contentieuse doit s’appréhender tant sous l’angle d’une juridiction, que sous celle de son juge. L’institution d’une fonction administrative contentieuse en Côte d’Ivoire remonte à l’époque coloniale. Cependant, à l’instar de la plupart des ex-colonies françaises, ce n’est qu’au lendemain de l’indépendance en 1960, que la fonction administrative contentieuse ivoirienne s’est affirmée en tant que fonction juridictionnelle autonome à l’égard du système français. La procédure administrative non contentieuse, comme la procédure administrative contentieuse dont il est question dans l’étude ont connu de grands progrès tant en France que dans les pays francophones d’Afrique pour lesquels le système de juridiction administrative comme le droit qu’il vise à contrôler ont longtemps constitué, selon la belle formule de Jean RIVERO, un bon « produit d’exportation » français. La Côte d’ivoire n’échappe pas à ce constat. Aussi l’étude de la fonction administrative contentieuse en Côte d’Ivoire a pour objet de dessiner la physionomie générale de la justice administrative ivoirienne un demi siècle après son institution afin d’en souligner les éléments de permanence ou de changement
Generally speaking, the contentious administrative function can be arrested as all the jurisdictions asked to know disputes resulting from the activity of the authorities. She represente the jurisdictional activity in administrative subject. Consequently, the contentious administrative functio has to dread as long under the angle of a jurisdiction, that under that of his judge. The institution of a contentious administrative function (office) in Ivory Coast goes back up to the colonial time. However, following the example of most of the French ex-colonies, it is that after the independence in 1960, that the Ivory Coast contentious administrative function asserted itself as autonomous jurisdictional office towards the French system. The not contentious administrative procedure, as the contentious administrative procedure question of which it is in the study knew big progress both in France and in the French-speaking countries of Africa for which the system of jurisdiction administrative as the right at which it aims at checking constituted for a long time, according to the Jean RIVERO's beautiful formula, a voucher " produced by export " French. Ivory Coast does not escape this report. So, the study of the contentious administrative office in Ivory Coast has for object to draw the general face of the Ivory Coast administrative justice half a century after her institution to underline the elements of durability or change
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Mikayelyan, Parandzem. "Parallel Realities: How to handle parallel-proceedings in investor-state disputes?" Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-412153.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Jurisdictional disputes"

1

Burns, Robert E. A cooperative approach toward resolving electric transmission jurisdictional disputes. Columbus, Ohio (1080 Carmack Rd., Columbus 43210): Ohio State University, National Regulatory Research Institute, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Congress, Trades Union. TUC disputes principles and procedures. London: TUC, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Congress, Trades Union. TUC disputes, principles and procedures. London: Trades Union Congress, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ray, Van Sweringen, ed. Construction jurisdiction handbook. Annapolis, Md. (Box 2069-C, Annapolis 21404): Van Sweringen Corp., 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Bureau of National Affairs (Washington, D.C.), ed. Construction craft jurisdiction agreements. Washington, D.C: Bureau of National Affairs, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bureau of National Affairs (Washington, D.C.), ed. Construction craft jurisdiction agreements. Washington, D.C: Bureau of National Affairs, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Union raiding: Rivalry in B.C. mines, smelters, and metal industries. Kingston, Ont., Canada: Industrial Relations Centre, Queen's University of Kingston, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Questioni sulla contrattazione collettiva: Legittimazione, efficacia, dissenso. Milano: Giuffrè, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Grandy, H. Clifton. Tribal court-state court forums: A how-to-do-it guide to prevent and resolve jurisdictional disputes and improve cooperation between tribal and state courts. Williamsburg, Va: National Center for State Courts, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gebre-Medhin, David Larsson. Compliance with territorial awards: Territorial concessions, domestic constraints, and international legal rulings. Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Jurisdictional disputes"

1

Churchill, Robin. "The Soviet Union and Jurisdictional Disputes in Northern Waters." In The Soviet Union and Northern Waters, 44–61. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315001807-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Varesis, Faidon. "Globalisation and Commercial Disputes." In Private International Law and Arbitral Jurisdiction, 22–37. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003264088-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ardito, Giovanni. "Assessing State Jurisdictional Immunities Through the Lenses of the European Court of Human Rights: Embassy Employment Disputes as Test Bench for Restrictive Immunity." In Sovereign Immunity Under Pressure, 273–96. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87706-4_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ambrose, Clare, Karen Maxwell, and Michael Collett QC. "Disputes about the tribunal’s jurisdiction." In London Maritime Arbitration, edited by Bruce Harris, 77–95. Fourth edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2017. | Series: Lloyd’s shipping law library: Informa Law from Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315619316-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ramstedt, Martin. "Religion and Disputes in Bali’s New Village Jurisdictions." In Religion in Disputes, 111–28. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137318343_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Varesis, Faidon. "Cross-border Jurisdiction in Commercial Disputes." In Private International Law and Arbitral Jurisdiction, 38–52. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003264088-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

McWhinney, Edward. "The Jurisdiction of the Full Court of the International Court, and the Special Chambers Gloss to Jurisdiction." In Judicial Settlement of International Disputes, 56–90. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6796-5_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Johnson, Philip McBride. "Reflections on the CFTC/SEC Jurisdictional Dispute." In Regulating International Financial Markets: Issues and Policies, 143–48. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3880-2_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

McWhinney, Edward. "A Contemporary, Operational Approach to Court Jurisdiction and Justiciability." In Judicial Settlement of International Disputes, 122–55. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6796-5_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Brasher, Sally Mayall. "Jurisdictional disputes." In Hospitals and Charity. Manchester University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526119285.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter five examines the process of greater secularization in the management of the facilities and attempts by the church officials to reassert control and authority over these groups in the late fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries. The endemic conflict between and within cities, and with the institutional church and imperial powers, resulted in a politicization of all civic organizations, but in particular of the administration of the hospital. Institutional mismanagement and even corruption resulted as the pious impulse was politicized. Efforts by the ecclesiastical authorities to combat this degeneration were frustrated by their own inability keep a clean house. At the same time, civic authorities who, increasingly needed the social services offered by the hospital and hoped to profit from the income of the facilities, worked to appropriate control and authority over the institutions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Jurisdictional disputes"

1

Ivanova, Yuliya. "JURISDICTIONAL WAYS TO RESOLVE DISPUTES RELATED TO THE UPBRINGING OF CHILDREN (WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF GUARDIANSHIP AUTHORITIES)." In Law and law: problems of theory and practice. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02033-3/118-123.

Full text
Abstract:
Study of participation of bodies of guardianship and guardianship in cases involving the upbringing of children is primarily the increased interest in the development and education of minors in the domestic state, and also enshrined in our country of the ability to use in resolving disputes related to the upbringing of children, relatively new to our state of the mediation procedure, insufficient knowledge of the issue.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Chin Eang, Ong. "B2C E-Commerce Trust in Redress Mechanism (Cross Border Issues)." In 2003 Informing Science + IT Education Conference. Informing Science Institute, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/2596.

Full text
Abstract:
The rise of consumer concerns of trust issue in e-commerce is due to the fact that when disputes occur in the cross-border environment, what is the level of protections (redress) that is available and which jurisdictions that is applicable and enforceable. This paper discuss the issue that with the current three major redress mechanisms, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), Country of Origin and Country of Destination. Yet, consumers trust still an issue. It is well recognized that Cross Border environment and Jurisdiction that give rise to the concerns. This paper raises perhaps more important issues that relate to the gap and loophole that be living in the three redress mechanisms and jurisdictions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Park, Borinara. "Ethical Consideration of Construction Union Strategies in Jurisdictional Disputes Based on an Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) and a Game Theory." In 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC), 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.22260/isarc2011/0078.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ветрова, Евгения Германовна, and Илья Александрович Васильев. "CRITERIA OF RECOGNITION FOR THE LETTER OF SPORTS FEDERATION OF THE STATUS OF THE DECISION ON THE EXAMPLE OF DISPUTES CAS 2008/A/1633 AND CAS 2016/A/4772." In Психология. Спорт. Здравоохранение: сборник избранных статей по материалам Международной научной конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Июнь 2020). Crossref, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/psm291.2020.63.12.003.

Full text
Abstract:
В статье анализируется практика принятия решений CAS в отношении критериев признания статуса юрисдикционных решений для писем и сообщений органов спортивных федераций. Кроме того, дается определение понятия "решения", данное в соответствии с практикой CAS. При этом по существу рассматриваются форма и содержание решений международных спортивных федераций, передаваемых субъекту спорта. The article analyzes the practice of CAS decision-making in relation to the criteria for recognizing the status of jurisdictional decisions for letters and messages of Sports Federations' bodies. In addition, the article provides a definition of the concept of “decision”, given in accordance with the CAS practice. At the same time, the form and content of decisions of international sports federations transmitted to the subject of sport are considered in essence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Belova, Gabriela, Gergana Georgieva, and Anna Hristova. "THE FOREIGN INVESTORS AND NATIONALITY CONCEPT UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW." In 4th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2020 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times. Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31410/eman.2020.193.

Full text
Abstract:
Although in the last years the international community has adopted a broad approach, the definition of foreign investors and foreign investments is still very important for the development of international investment law. The nationality of the foreign investor, whether a natural person or legal entity, sometimes is decisive, especially in front of the international jurisdictions. The paper tries to follow the examples from bilateral investment agreements as well as from multilateral instrument such as the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Convention. An important case concerning Bulgaria in past decades is also briefly discussed. The authors pay attention to some new moments re-developing the area of investment dispute settlement within the context of EU Mixed Agreements, especially after the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Попанова, Аниса Асламбековна. "ADVISORY JURISDICTION OF THE UN INTERNATIONAL COURT." In Образование. Культура. Общество: сборник избранных статей по материалам Международной научной конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Июнь 2020). Crossref, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/ecs291.2020.58.55.029.

Full text
Abstract:
В Статуте Международного Суда ООН содержится положение о том, что в компетенцию Суда входит не только функция по разрешению любого рода международных споров, возникающих между двумя и более государствами, но и функция по предоставлению консультаций по любым возникающим вопросам международного характера. В статье автором предпринята попытка по ее всестороннему анализу. The Statute of the UN International Court of Justice contains a provision that the competence of the Court includes not only the function of resolving any kind of international disputes arising between two or more states, but also the function of providing advice on any emerging issues of an international nature. In the article, the author made an attempt to comprehensively analyze it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Смагина, Елена, and Elena Smagina. "Questions of jurisdiction of disputes on the division of joint property of spouses." In International legal aspects of family law and protection of children's rights. Москва: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2963-282-286.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Saeed, Sardar. "Criterion of the administrative court jurisdiction in the shadow of the code of consultation council of Kurdistan region No. (14) of 2008." In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DEFICIENCIES AND INFLATION ASPECTS IN LEGISLATION. University of Human Development, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21928/uhdicdial.pp25-41.

Full text
Abstract:
The Kurdistan legislator has adopted, affectedly by both the Iraqi legislator and Egyptian legislator, in the consultation council of Kurdistan region code No. 14 of 2008 a mixed criterion for determining the jurisdiction of administrative court, as he has depended on a criterion which is based on the administrative decision on one hand, and another criterion which relies on the determining the dispute on the other hand. This has led to the jurisdiction deactivation of the mentioned court due to the weak drafting in terms of logic and language
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ayu, Bumi, and Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu. "The Jurisdiction of “Larvul Ngabal” as a Mediation of Land Disputes in Kei Islands." In International Conference on Economics, Business, Social, and Humanities (ICEBSH 2021). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210805.061.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Габазов, Тимур Султанович, and Аюб Бисланович Сулейманов. "CONCILIATION PROCEDURES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN THE LIGHT OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS." In Социально-экономические и гуманитарные науки: сборник избранных статей по материалам Международной научной конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Апрель 2021). Crossref, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/seh296.2021.46.40.010.

Full text
Abstract:
Статья посвящена исследованию актуальности института примирительных процедур в свете введения новой главы в ГПК РФ. Описывается процесс возникновения этой законодательной новеллы, столь необходимой в настоящее время в гражданском судопроизводстве, принимая во внимание юридического значения, придаваемое мирному урегулированию гражданских споров, рассматриваемых судами общей юрисдикции. Работа также предоставляет актуальную статистическую информацию. The article is devoted to the study of the relevance of the institution of conciliation procedures in the light of the introduction of a new chapter in the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation. The process of the emergence of this legislative novelty, which is so necessary at present in civil proceedings, taking into account the legal significance attached to the peaceful settlement of civil disputes considered by the courts of general jurisdiction, is described. The work also provides up-to-date statistical information.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Jurisdictional disputes' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography