Relevant bibliographies by topics / Kampala Revision Conference 2010

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Kampala Revision Conference 2010'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 17 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Kampala Revision Conference 2010.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Kampala Revision Conference 2010"

1

Díaz Soto, José Manuel. "Una aproximación al crimen internacional de agresión." Derecho Penal y Criminología 35, no. 99 (December 22, 2014): 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v35n99.02.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>El presente artículo expone el desarrollo del crimen de agresión en el ámbito del derecho internacional, partiendo desde sus antecedentes hasta llegar a la definición alcanzada en la ciudad de Kampala, Uganda, durante la primera Conferencia de Revisión del Estatuto de la Corte Penal Internacional, el 11 de junio de 2010. Seguidamente, de una manera detallada analiza el régimen jurídico que rodea al crimen de agresión, su naturaleza jurídica, su concordancia con los principios de legalidad y complementariedad, el tipo objetivo descrito, el umbral de gravedad y antijuridicidad del acto de agresión como fundamento de la responsabilidad penal individual, el elemento subjetivo o mens rea del crimen, la figura de la tentativa, también los mecanismos de activación de la jurisdicción de la CPI. Complementariamente, este trabajo analiza las implicaciones que tiene el consenso alcanzado en Kampala a través de la Resolución RC/Res. 6, instrumento que representa un avance significativo para el crimen de agresión en el derecho internacional aunque ha sido objeto de diversas críticas. Partiendo de este escenario, el autor toma posición con la finalidad de encontrar una aplicación correcta de la norma en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano. </p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Jia, Bing Bing. "The Crime of Aggression as Custom and the Mechanisms for Determining Acts of Aggression." American Journal of International Law 109, no. 3 (July 2015): 569–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.3.0569.

Full text
Abstract:
The fallout from the 2010 Kampala Review Conference for the United States has been explained by Harold Koh and Todd Buchwald, who were officially involved in the negotiations at the conference. The concerns they enumerate serve to implicate, inter alia, two issues of broad importance for the international community: the definition of the crime of aggression, and the clear divide between the positions of the permanent members of the UN Security Council and the rest of the Kampala participants with respect to the Councils role in implementing the Rome Statute’s new provisions on the crime of aggression. This Note, which focuses on those two issues, is partly a response to some of their criticisms and partly an independent assessment of the consequences of the Review Conference. It also evaluates the Kampala amendments to the Rome Statute’in particular, Articles 8 bis, 15 bis, and 15 ter—from the perspective of customary law and considers their impact on the role assigned to the Council under the UN Charter.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Mancini, Marina. "A Brand New Definition for the Crime of Aggression: The Kampala Outcome." Nordic Journal of International Law 81, no. 2 (2012): 227–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181012x638098.

Full text
Abstract:
At the first Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which was held in Kampala in 2010, the negotiations on the crime of aggression resulted in a complex package, at the core of which are the definition of the crime and the conditions for the exercise of the Court’s jurisdiction over it. This article examines the definition of the crime of aggression, as enshrined in the new Article 8 bis, considering the various parts of that package as well as the existing practice and case law. On the basis of this analysis, it evaluates the relevance of the Kampala definition to the evolution of customary international law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

BLOKKER, NIELS, and CLAUS KRESS. "A Consensus Agreement on the Crime of Aggression: Impressions from Kampala." Leiden Journal of International Law 23, no. 4 (November 22, 2010): 889–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156510000440.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe authors participated in the ICC Review Conference held in Kampala in June 2010, which adopted by consensus a package agreement on the crime of aggression. This contribution presents some impressions from these negotiations. It was rather unexpected that consensus agreement could be reached, and the authors offer some explanations why this was possible. They also analyse the key elements of the agreement. After the international criminalization of aggression has been debated for decades, a decisive step has now been taken towards bringing this crime within the effective jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Koh, Harold Hongju, and Todd F. Buchwald. "The Crime of Aggression: The United States Perspective." American Journal of International Law 109, no. 2 (April 2015): 257–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.2.0257.

Full text
Abstract:
At the 2010 Review Conference in Kampala, the states parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) decided to adopt seven amendments to the Rome Statute that contemplate the possibility of the Court exercising jurisdiction over the crime of aggression subject to certain conditions. One condition was that the exercise of jurisdiction would be “subject to a decision to be taken after 1 January 2017 by the same majority of States Parties as is required for the adoption of an amendment to the Statute,” and another was that such jurisdiction could be exercised “only with respect to crimes of aggression committed one year after the ratification or acceptance of the amendments by thirty States Parties.” As these dates approach, we—two lawyers who represented the United States at the Kampala conference and who worked many hours on the United States’ reengagement with the ICC during the Obama administration—thought it an appropriate moment to take stock of where we are, how we got here, and where we might or should be headed with respect to the crime of aggression.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Nemane, Vivek V., and Indraneel D. Gunjal. "Article 124 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: ‘Transitional Provision’ or ‘The Right to (Convenient) Opt-out’." International Criminal Law Review 15, no. 5 (June 27, 2015): 949–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01505004.

Full text
Abstract:
Article 123 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court provides for a Review Conference to consider any amendments to the statute. Amendments proposed and forwarded by the Assembly of State Parties (asp) were considered during the first Review Conference held at Kampala in 2010. Out of the three potential amendments to the Rome Statute, a proposal to delete Article 124 of the Statute failed. This article evaluates the consistency between contents and objectives of the Rome Statute with reference to a dichotomy which has been emerged after the first Review Conference due to the retention of Article 124. The article questions the basis of the retention of Article 124, and argues that the ‘opt-out provision’ enshrined in Article 124 should be deleted from the Rome Statute during the fourteenth session of the asp in 2015.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Fernández Arribas, Gloria. "Crimen de agresión = Crime of aggression." EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad 13 (September 29, 2017): 283. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2017.3824.

Full text
Abstract:
Resumen: El crimen de agresión fue incluido como uno de los crímenes de competencia de la Corte Penal Internacional en el Estatuto de Roma, si bien en la actualidad la Corte no ejerce aún la competencia sobre el mismo. La definición del crimen de agresión, así como el régimen de entrada en vigor y ejercicio de la competencia, fue desarrollado en la Resolución 6 adoptada en la Conferencia de Kampala en 2010, mediante la cual se enmienda el Estatuto de la Corte. En este trabajo se analiza, junto con la definición del crimen, el complicado y en ocasiones enrevesado régimen de entrada en vigor y ejercicio de la competencia, que difiere según los asuntos sean remitidos por un Estado miembro o proprio motu, o por el Consejo de Seguridad.Palabras clave: Crimen de agresión, Corte Penal Internacional, entrada en vigor, jurisdicción, inmunidades.Abstract: The crime of aggression was included in the Rome Statute as one of the crimes under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, although the Court has not yet exercised its jurisdiction over this crime. The definition of the crime of aggression, as well as the regimes to entry into force and the exercise of jurisdiction were established in Resolution 6 adopted at the Kampala Conference in 2010, which amended the Rome Statute. This paper analyzes, together with the definition of crime, the complicated and sometimes intricate regime of entry into force and exercise of jurisdiction, which differs regarding whether the cases are referred by a Member State or proprio motu, or by the Security Council.Keywords: Crime of aggression, International Criminal Court, entry into force, jurisdiction, immunities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Barriga, Stefan, and Leena Grover. "A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression." American Journal of International Law 105, no. 3 (July 2011): 517–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.105.3.0517.

Full text
Abstract:
At 12:20 in the morning on Saturday, June 12, 2010, the Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in Kampala, Uganda, adopted by consensus a comprehensive package of amendments on the crime of aggression. States parties to the Rome Statute thereby delivered on their promise, reflected in Article 5 (2) of the Statute, to define the crime of aggression and to agree on the conditions for the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over that crime. Despite a thorough and more than decadelong preparatory process, few, if any, had predicted such a substantive outcome on the crime of aggression in light of the serious disagreements on major questions, which persisted until the last days of the conference. The key elements of the final package are a definition of the crime of aggression, which limits criminal responsibility to leaders who are responsible for the most serious forms of the illegal use of force between states, and a complicated set of conditions for exercising jurisdiction. Investigations would be based on either a Security Council referral or state consent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hajdin, Nikola. "The Nature of Leadership in the Crime of Aggression: The ICC’s New Concern?" International Criminal Law Review 17, no. 3 (June 14, 2017): 543–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01703007.

Full text
Abstract:
Since the Nuremberg trials, it has been accepted that only the highest echelon of state leadership can be responsible for the crime of aggression. The crime of aggression is distinguished from other core crimes under the International Criminal Court’s (icc) purview by, inter alia, its leadership nature. According to Articles 8bis(1) and 25(3bis) of the Rome Statute, only a person ‘in a position effectively to exercise control over or direct the political or military action of a State’ can be held responsible for aggression. The ‘control or direct’ standard was adopted at the first Review Conference of the Rome Statute in Kampala in 2010 and differs from the customary counterpart (‘shape or influence’) established by the Nuremberg Military Tribunal (nmt). This article will explore how the leadership clause has evolved and whether the new standard is more appropriate for the icc.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

ZHU, Dan. "China, the Crime of Aggression, and the International Criminal Court." Asian Journal of International Law 5, no. 1 (April 11, 2014): 94–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2044251314000046.

Full text
Abstract:
At the Kampala Review Conference in 2010, the adoption of the amendments to the Rome Statute laid the groundwork for the eventual prosecution of the crime of aggression. China, a non-State Party to the International Criminal Court, has articulated its concerns regarding the Court's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression in legal terms. This paper examines the Chinese concerns regarding the role of the Security Council in the determination of an act of aggression and the definition of aggression primarily from a legal perspective. It argues that China has hovered back and forth between two conflicting legal positions on these issues during different periods in history according to its policy preference. This paper also considers the concerns of China from a policy perspective before concluding that the crime of aggression should not be regarded as an insurmountable barrier preventing China's accession to the ICC in years to come.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Kampala Revision Conference 2010"

1

Kolářová, Michaela. "Mezinárodní trestní soud a jeho věcná jurisdikce - se zaměřením na zločin agrese." Master's thesis, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-296684.

Full text
Abstract:
1 SUMMARY THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AND ITS SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION WITH REGARD TO THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION The current course of events concerning the crime of aggression and the search for its definition has undergone a remarkable shift during these days. In the light of the Revision Conference in Kampala, Uganda, whose declared aim was to evaluate the role and the up- to-date operation of the International Criminal Court as well as to find the definition of the crime of aggression and to set up the conditions to exercise the jurisdiction concerning the crime of aggression, the worldwide understanding of the conception of the crime of aggression has been significantly changed . The aim of this paper is to familiarize the reader with the problems regarding the crime of aggression, to describe the evolution of its conception in the field of international law within the last few decades and to provide the reader with a brief outline of some problematic questions which arose from the negotiations of the definition among the states. Further, the thesis attempts to depict the development of the negotiations themselves and to focus on the main disagreements, which the states had to face. The introductory chapter deals with some theoretical questions related to the international criminal justice. The...
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Kampala Revision Conference 2010"

1

Relations, Council on Foreign, ed. From Rome to Kampala: The U.S. approach to the 2010 International Criminal Court Review Conference. New York, NY: Council On Foreign Relations, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Organization, International Maritime. HNS Convention: International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea, 2010 : including overview of the 2010 HNS Convention guidelines on reporting of HNS contributing cargo final act of the International Conference of 2010 on revision of the HNS Convention and resolutions of the conference. London: International Maritime Organization, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Review Conference of the Rome Statute (1st : 2010 : Kampala, Uganda), ed. International Criminal Court Review Conference, Kampala, Uganda, May 31-June 11, 2010: A joint committee staff trip report prepared for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, second session, September 2, 1010. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Roger S, Clark. Part IV The ICC and its Applicable Law, 31 The Crime of Aggression. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198705161.003.0031.

Full text
Abstract:
The crime of aggression was included, in principle, within the jurisdiction of the ICC by the Rome Statute of 1998. Making that jurisdiction operational was, however, left to the First Review Conference on the Court, which took place in Kampala in 2010. This chapter discusses the details of the Kampala Amendments to the Rome Statute, including the Elements of Crime of aggression. It analyses efforts to obtain sufficient ratifications of the amendments to bring them into force, as well as the implementation of aggression in domestic legislation. It argues that a State ratifying the Kampala Amendments should domesticate Article 8bis and its Elements as closely as possible by penal legislation, and award at least jurisdiction over conduct of its own nationals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

William A, Schabas. Part 2 Jurisdiction, Admissibility, and Applicable Law: Compétence, Recevabilité, Et Droit Applicable, Art.15ter Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (Security Council referral)/Exercice de la compétence à l’égard du crime d’agression (Renvoi par le Conseil de sécurité). Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198739777.003.0020.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter comments on Article 15ter of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Article 15ter is part of a package of amendments adopted at the Kampala Review Conference in 2010. Under article 13(b), the Security Council may trigger the jurisdiction of the Court with respect ‘over the crime of aggression’. Article 13(b) entitles the Security Council to trigger the Court's jurisdiction, pursuant to Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations. Article 15ter(1) makes clear that the Security Council may only trigger jurisdiction over the crime of aggression in accordance with the provisions of article 15ter. Essentially, this is about the temporal limits of the exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

William A, Schabas. Part 2 Jurisdiction, Admissibility, and Applicable Law: Compétence, Recevabilité, Et Droit Applicable, Art.8bis Crime of aggression/Crime d’agression. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198739777.003.0011.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter comments on Article 8bis of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Article 8bis defines the crime of aggression, one of four categories of offence within the subject-matter jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. The provision is part of a package of amendments adopted at the Kampala Review Conference in 2010. It entered into force in accordance with article 121(5) one year after ratification of the amendments by the first State Party. Liechtenstein was the first State Party to ratify the amendments, on May 8, 2012. Consequently, the amendment entered into force on May 8, 2013. On that date, the amendment was registered by the depository, the Secretary-General of the United Nations. However, exercise of jurisdiction by the Court over article 8bis is subject to article 15bis and article 15ter.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Murphy, Sean D. Sean D. The Crime of Aggression at the International Criminal Court. Edited by Marc Weller. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199673049.003.0025.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter focuses on the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. The discussion provides background to the crime of aggression and the resulting criminal accountability of the guilty party, paying particular attention to UN General Assembly’s adoption in 1974 of a resolution addressing aggression by states rather than the crimes of individuals and is designed as guidance for the Security Council when considering whether an act is one of ‘aggression’. The chapter examines the amendments to the ICC Rome Statute defining ‘act of aggression’ and ‘crime of aggression’ adopted at the ICC Review Conference in Kampala, Uganda, in 2010. It also discusses the uncertainties and ambiguities in the process for activating ICC jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. It considers the possible institutional effects of such jurisdiction on the UN Security Council and the ICC itself, as well as its long-term consequences for the jus ad bellum.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

William A, Schabas. Part 2 Jurisdiction, Admissibility, and Applicable Law: Compétence, Recevabilité, Et Droit Applicable, Art.15bis Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (State referral, proprio motu )/Exercice de la compétence à l’égard du crime d’agression (Renvoi par un État, de sa propre initiative). Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198739777.003.0019.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter comments on Article 15bis of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Article 15bis along with article 15ter govern the exercise of jurisdiction by the Court with respect to the crime of aggression. They are part of a package of amendments adopted at the Kampala Review Conference in 2010. Article 15bis governs prosecution for the crime of aggression based upon referral by a State Party or at the initiative proprio motu of the Prosecutor. Its counterpart, article 15ter, deals with referral of a situation involving the crime of aggression by the Security Council. Although article 15bis precedes article 15ter within the architecture of the Rome Statute, in reality the process operates in the opposite order. That is because action under article 15bis is dependent on either action or inaction by the Security Council. If the Security Council determines that an act of aggression has taken place, then either a State Party or the Prosecutor may initiate an investigation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Kampala Revision Conference 2010"

1

Geiβ, Robin. "Poison, Gas and Expanding Bullets: The Extension of the List of Prohibited Weapons at the Review Conference of the International Criminal Court in Kampala." In Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law - 2010, 337–52. The Hague, The Netherlands: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Schröttner, J., and A. Herzog. "Development of a System Dynamics Model for Cost Estimation for the Implantation and Revision of Hip Joint Endoprosthesis." In XII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2010, 566–69. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13039-7_142.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Galinski, Christian, and Helmut Beckmann. "Concepts for Enhancing Content Quality and eAccessibility." In Handbook of Research on E-Business Standards and Protocols, 84–101. IGI Global, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0146-8.ch005.

Full text
Abstract:
The important aspect of interoperable content and content accessibility is still not sufficiently acknowledged in most eApplications. Although pertinent standards exist, some of them need revision and additional standards are needed for new requirements. The Recommendation on software and content development principles 2010 formulated at the 12th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2010) addresses this situation. This chapter gives an overview of the state of the art with a special focus on eProcurement. It argues that eAccessibility in eProcurement cannot be achieved without taking care of content interoperability and accessibility. This would not only help persons with disabilities (PwD) whose numbers are increasing by the day to live a more independent life and to enjoy better education, but also create new job opportunities in the ICT (information and communication technologies) and ICT-related content and service industries as well as in the field of eProcurement itself.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Kampala Revision Conference 2010"

1

Jones, P., S. Mitter, and V. Saligrama. "Revision of marginal probability assessments." In 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icif.2010.5711875.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Yanhai Zhao, Jianyang Li, and Xiuzheng Xie. "An intelligent recommender derived from its characteristic case revision." In 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccasm.2010.5619192.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Dongning Rao and Zhihua Jiang. "Iterative Belief Revision in Partial Observable Non-deterministic Planning." In 2010 Fourth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (ICGEC 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icgec.2010.44.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Malik, Haroon, and Elhadi Shakshuki. "Predicting Function Changes by Mining Revision History." In 2010 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/itng.2010.19.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Castro-Manzano, Jose Martin, Axel Arturo Barcelo-Aspeitia, and Alejandro Guerra-Hernandez. "Intentional Learning Procedures as Intention Revision Mechanisms." In 2010 Ninth Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAI). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/micai.2010.29.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Braun, Andreas, Oliver Bringmann, Djones Lettnin, and Wolfgang Rosenstiel. "Simulation-based verification of the MOST NetInterface specification revision 3.0." In 2010 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/date.2010.5457148.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ma, Jianbing, Weiru Liu, Didier Dubois, and Henri Prade. "Revision Rules in the Theory of Evidence." In 2010 22nd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2010.50.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Malik, Manish. "Supporting exam revision via Google talk and Examopedia wiki." In 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fie.2010.5673438.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Scheer, Justin K., Jessica A. Tang, Vedat Deviren, Jenni M. Buckley, Murat Pekmezci, R. Trigg McClellan, and Christopher P. Ames. "Revision Strategies in Spinal Deformity With Hardware Failure: A Biomechanical Study." In ASME 2010 Summer Bioengineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/sbc2010-19131.

Full text
Abstract:
Failure of the posterior rods in long thoracolumbar deformity correction cases often requires revision surgery to treat the pseudoarthrosis and prevent loss of correction. While the entire rod can be replaced, this involves opening the entire incision which can lead to increased morbidity. Other clinically advantageous options include minimally invasive surgical approaches such as percutaneous insertion of connectors and additional rods.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Guo, Jiahong, and Dongping Gao. "An Attempt to Represent Rational Revision on Stable Sets." In 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cise.2010.5676977.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Kampala Revision Conference 2010' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography