To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Khvostov.
Journal articles on the topic 'Khvostov'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Khvostov.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Dovgy, Olga. "Pushkin Reads Count Khvostov – Count Khvostov Reads Pushkin." Stephanos Peer reviewed multilanguage scientific journal 58, no. 2 (2023): 117–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.24249/2309-9917-2023-58-2-117-125.
Full textAbstract:
The article continues series of author’s publications on Count D. Khvostov’s works and is a sketch for a large work devoted to the reception of Russian literature in Khvostov poetry. There is an extensive literature on A. Pushkin and Khvostov personal and professional relations. This article presents some textual cross-talks of two poets, which may be the beginning of new interpretive paths.
2
Novikov, Mikhail V., and Tatiana B. Perfilova. "M. M. Khvostov's use of the concepts of «evolution» and «progress»." Verhnevolzhski Philological Bulletin 2, no. 25 (2021): 207–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.20323/2499-9679-2021-2-25-207-214.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers M. M. Khvostov's attitude to the concepts of «evolution» and «progress», and the peculiarities of their application in his scientific works. It is noted that, unlike many of his colleagues who abandoned the use of the concept of «progress» at the end of the XIX century, Khvostov did not replace it with a stricter concept of «evolution» and continued to apply both concepts, replacing one concept with the other, considering them equivalent, on the assumption that both concepts refer to the strictly directed movement of society forward, from the lowest to the highest, from the simple to the complex, from the primitive to the «more cultural». In relation to Ancient Greece, M. M. Khvostov emphasizes the faster pace of the emergence of new cultural achievements from century to century, and the desire of the Greeks themselves for constant aesthetic self-improvement. Recognizing the existence of obstacles (military actions, «revolution», conservatism of certain strata of society, etc.) on the path of the continuous evolution of ancient societies, M. M. Khvostov, however, did not dare to «improve» the sociological doctrines of O. Comte, J. S. Mill, G. Spencer, remaining faithful to the speculative constructions of his great predecessors. It is noted that M. M. Khvostov did not show interest in N. I. Kareev's arguments about the essence of evolution and progress, that not every evolution can be considered progress, that the idea of progress is a representation of an evaluative nature, therefore it is subjective, incompatible with the ideals of an accurate, objective evidence-based science, that is, positivism. The authors emphasize that M. M. Khvostov, about a decade after his colleagues, also began to avoid using the concept of«progress,» preferring the concept of «evolution with a general progressive orientation. He did so under the influence of new beliefs, including the recognition of E. Meyer's concept of the cyclical development of Ancient nations. It is noted that over time the concepts of «progressive ideals,» «progressive views» became associated more with political activity; the concepts of «progress in science,» «progress in technology,» «progress in the economy,» and progress in a certain branch of culture – with successes and achievements in the social, economic and cultural spheres of society
3
Ivinskij, Alexander D. "M. N. Muravyov and D. I. Khvostov: The Problem of Success at the Court of Catherine II." Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 82, no. 4 (2023): 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s160578800027389-3.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the analysis of literary relations between M.N. Muravyov and D.I. Khvostov. It is based on materials held by the Department of Manuscripts of the Russian State Library, the Department of Written Sources of the State Historical Museum and the Manuscript Department of the Institute of Russian Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences. These materials have not yet attracted the attention of researchers. In the paper we publish and comment Muravyov’s poem “To Dmitry Ivanovich Khvostov&8j1; and 13 letters to Khvostov. The new data shows that Muravyov played the role of an “intermediary&8j1; between the authorities and the Khvostov, and, consequently, participated in the formation of the cultural policy of Empress Catherine II.
4
Botova, V. I. "SICILIAN-NORMAN TRAIL IN THE ORIGIN OF THE MOSCOW BOYARS OF THE VORONTSOV AND KHVOSTOV DYNASTIES." History: facts and symbols, no. 1 (March 10, 2023): 48–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.24888/2410-4205-2023-34-1-48-71.
Full textAbstract:
The article contains the results of a study of the family relationship of the famous Moscow boyars Vorontsovs and Khvostovs, who served in the Moscow principality as thousands and governors for a hundred years, starting from the second half of the 13th century, as well as the degree of their relationship with the Moscow princes. The work uses a comprehensive approach to the analysis of various archival sources in combination with the genetic data of the y-chromosome of modern descendants. The documentary base of the work was made up of European and Russian chronicle sources of the 12th-16th centuries, archival information from the regional archives of Russia, European genealogical tables on the history of European states and genealogies of Russian princes and nobles. The search showed that in the middle of the XII century the ancestors of the Vorontsovs and Bassovol-Khvostovs could be siblings from the family of the knight Count Loritello Robert I Bassavil, a South Italian Norman from the Rollonid family. Their distant relationship with the princes from the Rurikovich-Monomashich dynasty was established. At the same time, the legend of the appearance of the Resh princes Vorontsov from the marriage unions of the descendants of the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa and Count Robert I Bassavil is substantiated. The genetic affiliation of the Vorontsov and Bassovol-Khvostov clans to the grand ducal family confirms the version of the murder of the Moscow thousandth boyar Alexei Khvost in 1357 as a possible contender for the throne and may be one of the main reasons for the cruel reprisal of Ivan the Terrible against members of this family close to the court long before the oprichnina and the expulsion of their relatives to Kazan immediately after its conquest.
5
Baturenko, S. A. "The role of women in the development of the culture of the future: concept by V.M. Khvostov." Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science 31, no. 1 (2025): 155–77. https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2025-31-1-155-177.
Full textAbstract:
Based on the analysis of primary sources, the article examines the problem of the role and importance of women in the development of culture in the works of the Russian sociologist of the XIX — early XX century Veniamin Mikhailovich Khvostov. The scientist devoted a large number of works to various aspects of the problem of women’s emancipation. The women’s issue, the problem of the status of women in society, and the emerging women’s movement became one of Khvostov’s subjects of scientifi c interest. His main idea is to affi rm the inevitable feminization of culture. The article shows the views of the Russian sociologist on transformations in the fi eld of culture, as well as the main forecasts for its further development, taking into account the intensifi cation of the women’s movement and the upcoming changes in the socio-political position of women. Khvostov proves that the intensity and completeness of cultural development depends on the involvement of all the diverse forces of the members of a given society, taking into account the abilities of each. The liberation of a woman will contribute to a qualitative change in culture, a change in her very character. The author of the article reconstructs the picture of the future created by a Russian classical sociologist. The result of the victory of feminism will be moral progress for both women and men. The struggle for women’s dignity for Khvostov means the struggle for human dignity in general. And it is precisely in the concept of human dignity that the fi nal solution to the women’s issue and many other social problems lies.
6
Imamutdinova, Albina, Nikita Kuvshinov, Elena Venidiktova, and Ramziya Gubaydullina. "PUGWASH CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND WORLD AFFAIRS: CONTRIBUTION MADE BY VLADIMIR MIKHAILOVICH KHVOSTOV." Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 7, no. 6 (2019): 301–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7654.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose: The article deals with the research activities and interests of Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov, which were quite diverse. After analyzing numerous historiographical and archival sources, as well as available literature on this topic, it will be advisable to identify three areas of scientific interests of the scientist.
 Methodology: The History of diplomacy and international relations; problems of General and national history (mainly the events of world wars); and the tasks of pedagogical science in General (including historical education). In any of the three presented topics of the study V. M. Khvostov managed to prove himself as a teacher, historian, and organizer of science.
 Results: Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov studied relations between the world's leading powers, military clashes, and diplomatic history. However, the creative contribution of this scientist has not yet been the subject of special consideration. The article marks the contribution made by Academician Khvostov Vladimir Mikhailovich in the Pugwash movement, his reports, and talks at international congresses and conferences.
 Applications: This research can be used for universities, teachers, and students.
 Novelty/Originality: This paper analyzes numerous historiographical and archival sources and available literature on the research activities and interests of Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov in the context of the History of diplomacy and international relations.
7
Yakovleva, E. L. "N. N. KHVOSTOV›S RECIPE BOOK AS EGO-DOCUMENT." Culture and Text, no. 54 (2023): 106–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2023-3-106-121.
Full textAbstract:
The object of the study is the book “History for Taste: the Culinary Notebook of the Personal Chef of F. I. Chaliapin”, which first came to the focus of scientific attention. Thanks to this ego-document of N. N. Khvostov, the gastronomic preferences of the great bass are reconstructed. The research method is analytical. Khvostov’s recipes reveal the gastronomic system of the bass, including food culture, reflection on eating, rationalism in eating, favorite ingredients of dishes. The analysis of recipes shows that F. I. Chaliapin was not only a lover of delicious food, but also a gourmet. The list of frequently mentioned ingredients and their characteristics indicate that the bass was keeping his health in check, and the cook was in charge of the owner’s diet.
8
Imamutdinova, Albina, Nikita Kuvshinov, Elena Andreeva, and Elena Venidiktova. "International Relations at the Beginning of the XX Century in the Works of Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov." Journal of Educational and Social Research 9, no. 4 (2019): 218–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jesr-2019-0074.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The article discusses the research activities of Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov, his creative legacy on issues and problems of international relations of the early ХХ century; the life of V.M. Khvostov, characterization and evolution of his approaches and views on the history of international relations, foreign policy. A prominent organizer and theorist in the field of pedagogical Sciences, academician Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov played a significant role in the formation of the Academy of pedagogical Sciences of the USSR – the all-Union center of pedagogical thought. As its first President, he paid great attention to the development and improvement of the system of humanitarian education in the school, taking into account all the tasks and requirements imposed by the practice of Communist construction in our country. In his reports and speeches at various scientific sessions and conferences, he repeatedly emphasized the exceptional importance of social Sciences in the training of not only educated girls and boys, but also in the formation of politically literate youth.
9
Новиков, М. В., and Т. Б. Перфилова. ""The history of states" and "the history of events" in the scientific discourse of M. M. Khvostov." Вестник гуманитарного образования, no. 2(22) (August 9, 2021): 9–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.25730/vsu.2070.21.015.
Full textAbstract:
Рассматривается система взглядов М. М. Хвостова на характер общественной эволюции применительно к истории народов Древнего мира. Отмечается эклектичность представлений ученого, наиболее ярко проявившаяся в ходе его рассуждений по важной для философии позитивизма проблеме о взаимодействии «истории состояний» и «истории событий». «Состояние» в трактовке ученого – это «общие перемены» и «сходное в отдельных событиях», «события» – случайность, «катастрофический элемент». Обращается внимание на своеобразное толкование Хвостовым понятия «катастрофа», аналогами которого он считал «случай», «событие», «момент». Отмечается попытка Хвостова, как и многих представителей «критического» позитивизма, психологизировать исторический процесс, найти причины возникновения «катастроф» в своеобразии психологии индивидов и социальных групп, из которых состоит общество: чем больше своеобразия, тем больше «катастрофического элемента в обществе», тем более такое общество будет отклоняться от непрерывного последовательного процесса эволюционного развития. Обращаясь к проблеме личности в истории, Хвостов утверждал, что, как бы ни была грандиозна и значительна личность, включая Александра Македонского, Юлия Цезаря, Петра Великого, она «не может произвести значительных переворотов в состояниях», хотя в истории отдельных «событий», таких как революция, игнорировать роль личности было бы опрометчиво. Подчеркивается, что Хвостова всегда влекло к выделению главного и существенного в историческом развитии, он стремился понять природу массового, типичного, обнаружить устойчивые связи между событиями и явлениями, найти исторические аналогии. В то же время отмечается нежелание Хвостова серьезно обратиться к проблеме соотношения понятий «история состояний» и «история событий», принять, что эти два понятия являются двумя сторонами одного и того же исторического процесса, образующего устойчивую систему, что между ними есть взаимоотношения, и «состояния» могут влиять на «события», а «события» – на «состояния». The article considers M. M. Khvostov's system of views on the nature of social evolution in relation to the history of the peoples of the Ancient World. The eclecticism of the scientist's ideas is noted, which was most clearly manifested in the course of his arguments on the problem of the interaction of the "history of states" and the "history of events", which is important for the philosophy of positivism. "State" in the scientist's interpretation is "general changes" and "similar in individual events", "events" is an accident, a "catastrophic element". Attention is drawn to the peculiar interpretation of the concept of "catastrophe" by Khvostov, whose analogues he considered "case", "event", "moment". The author notes Khvostov's attempt, like many representatives of "critical" positivism, to psychologize the historical process, to find the causes of "catastrophes" in the originality of the psychology of individuals and social groups that make up society: the more originality, the more "catastrophic element in society", the more such a society will deviate from the continuous sequential process of evolutionary development. Turning to the problem of personality in history, Khvostov argued that no matter how grandiose and significant a person, including Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Peter the Great, she "cannot produce significant coups in states", although in the history of individual "events", such as the revolution, it would be rash to ignore the role of personality. It is emphasized that Khvostov has always been attracted to highlight the main and essential in historical development, he sought to understand the nature of the mass, typical, to find stable connections between events and phenomena, to find historical analogies. At the same time, it is noted that Khvostov is unwilling to seriously address the problem of the relationship between the concepts of "history of states" and "history of events", to accept that these two concepts are two sides of the same historical process forming a stable system, that there are relationships between them, and "states" can influence "events", and "events" – on "states".
10
Warda, Anna. "Obraz zarazy w poezji Dmitrija Chwostowa." Slavica Wratislaviensia 177 (December 30, 2022): 15–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/0137-1150.177.2.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of the article is the image of the plague (specifically — cholera) that struck Russia in 1830, which was presented in two poems by a graphomaniac poet — Dmitry Khvostov (1757–1835). The aim of the research is to discuss in detail the poetic image of the epidemic in the poems Cholera of 1830 and July in Petropolis. The poetic portayal of the cholera epidemic in two of Russia’s largest metropolises focuses not only on the plague’s daunting form and effect, but also on strategies of combating it. The article uses descriptive, biographical, analytical, comparative and intertextual methods of research, which led to the conclusion that the method of imaging used by Khvostov was typical for the era of classicism and the literary tradition of M. Lomonosov, but in terms of originality and poetic artistry, it did not show any greater value. Khvostov identified plague with evil and unclean forces, and presented the fight against it as an expression of the highest bravery. The poetic descriptions of the plague are accompanied by passages typical of panegyric poetry praising the tsar and his actions taken during the pandemic.
11
Novikov, M. V., та T. B. Perfilovа. "Природная среда как исходный фактор социогенеза древних цивилизаций: трактовка М. М. Хвостова". Вестник гуманитарного образования, № 2(26) (31 серпня 2022): 105–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.25730/vsu.2070.22.011.
Full textAbstract:
The problem of the influence of the natural territorial complex on the historical and cultural development of the peoples of the Ancient World is considered in the interpretation of M. M. Khvostov, from the position of geographical determinism, which studied the dependence of the features of the "social evolution" of ancient civilizations on the nature of the natural environment. The separation of the geographical approach from the historical one in the interpretation of the historical process was explained by Khvostov by the fact that the sciences of society are primarily important "the results that are obtained from the impact of nature on human societies." It is noted that to evaluate these results, the scientist used the research of reputable European and Russian experts. Becoming an adept of anthropogeography, he applied the ideas of F. Ratzel's interpretation of the history and culture of the ancient Greeks. Khvostov managed to prove that the speed, intensity, direction and results of the processes of internal development of the ancient Greeks, including the "types of culture" that arose in Hellas, were determined by a set of natural indicators such as climate, orography, hydrography. Works of L. I. Mechnikov formed the basis of Khvostov's reflections on the initial conditions of the formation of civilizations in the Ancient East. According to Khvostov, the direct dependence on the geographical factor of socioeconomic and political-administrative ways of life in large river civilizations was expressed in the forms of social behavior of the population aimed at adapting to the habitat, and the organizational efforts of the ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian rulers to create and maintain irrigation facilities in order. Attention is drawn to the fact that the professor exaggerated the role of a favorable climate in the processes of ethno- and sociogenesis among European and Eastern peoples of antiquity. And although his own research pointed to the fallacy of the statement about the "temperate climate" as the best habitat, he did not make adjustments to the educational publications. It is emphasized that Khvostov failed to link the diversity of the development processes of ancient peoples with socio-cultural factors, but he was able to determine the directions of studying the influence of natural factors in historical discourse. Рассматривается проблема влияния природного территориального комплекса на историко-культурное развитие народов Древнего мира в трактовке М. М. Хвостова, с позиции географического детерминизма, изучавшего зависимость особенностей «общественной эволюции» древних цивилизаций от характера природной среды. Отделение географического подхода от исторического при трактовке исторического процесса Хвостов объяснял тем, что наукам об обществе важны прежде всего «результаты, которые получаются от воздействия природы на человеческие общества». Отмечается, что для оценки этих результатов ученый использовал исследования авторитетных европейских и российских экспертов. Став адептом антропогеографии, он применил идеи Ф. Ратцеля к интерпретации истории и культуры древних греков. Хвостову удалось доказать, что скорость, интенсивность, направленность и итоги протекания процессов внутреннего развития древних греков, в том числе и «типы культуры», возникшие в Элладе, детерминировались совокупностью таких природных показателей, как климат, орография, гидрография. Труды Л. И. Мечникова легли в основу рефлексий Хвостова об исходных условиях становления цивилизаций на Древнем Востоке. Прямая зависимость от географического фактора социально-экономического и политико-административного укладов жизни в крупных речных цивилизациях выражалась, по убеждению Хвостова, в формах социального поведения населения, направленных на адаптацию к среде обитания, и организационных усилиях древнеегипетских и месопотамских правителей по созданию и поддержанию в порядке ирригационных сооружений. Обращается внимание на то, что профессор преувеличивал роль благоприятного климата в процессах этно- и социогенеза у европейских и восточных народов древности. И хотя его собственные изыскания указывали на ошибочность заявления об «умеренном климате» как лучшей среде обитания, он не внес коррективов в учебные издания. Подчеркивается, что Хвостову не удалось связать разнообразие процессов развития народов древности с социокультурными факторами, но он смог определить направления изучения влияния природных факторов в историческом дискурсе.
12
Kurochkin, Alexander V. "N.M. Yazykov and Count D.I. Khvostov: Dialogue Between the Romanticist and the Classicist." Literary Fact, no. 22 (2021): 173–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2021-22-173-224.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the relationship of prominent representatives of opposite literary trends: the romanticist N.M. Yazykov and the classicist count D.I. Khvostov. Starting as a poetic game, the communication of two poets gradually developed into correspondence. The history of their dialogue is recreated on the basis of lifetime poetic publications and epistolary materials from Yazykov and Khvostov collections in the Manuscript Department of Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkin House) of the Russian Academy of Sciences. For the first time, the correspondence of two poets is introduced into scientific circulation. The work reveals the nature of their creative connections, outlines the facets of literary interests and assessments, complementing the picture of the history of literature in Pushkin's time. The article specifies some facts related to A.S. Pushkin.
13
Novikov, M. V., and T. B. Perfilova. "Sociological Discourse in M.M. Khvostov’s Works." Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki 164, no. 6 (2022): 9–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2022.6.9-29.
Full textAbstract:
This article analyzes the underlying aspects of the artistic heritage of M.M. Khvostov, an eminent professor at Imperial Kazan University. The focus is on the justification of the need for creating sociological history as a new type of explanatory history. The scholar’s coherent and consistent concept of sociological history was never introduced to the public, but its basics were laid and described in his publications and lecture courses. In this concept, history was qualified as an individualizing and idiographic study and sociology as a generalizing and nomothetic one. As a result of having stemmed from the belief in the unity of scientific methodology, M.M. Khvostov placed a greater emphasis on the overlapping of the subject fields and cognitive positions of these sociological branches rather than on their opposition. In order to overcome the opposition between the typological and concrete individual ways of comprehending historical reality, he proposed their theoretical and methodological synthesis on the principle of complementarity of tasks, research approaches, and methods. Therefore, the process of cognition was thought to involve studying unique facts, using the comparative historical method, as well as identifying common, similar, and typical features. The results obtained here are important for developing the theoretical and methodological foundations of historical science: M.M. Khvostov insisted that sociological history was destined to fill the existing abstract sociological schemes with reliable historical information, to contribute to the conceptualization of critically cited facts related to the multifaceted process of historical transformations of society.
14
Novikov, M. V., та T. B. Perfilova. "Методологические коллизии научного сознания М. М. Хвостова". Вестник гуманитарного образования, № 3(31) (5 грудня 2023): 100–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.25730/vsu.2070.23.042.
Full textAbstract:
The process of the evolution of M. M. Khvostov's scientific consciousness from a historianresearcher of a historical fact and a purely empirical analysis of its consequences to a social scientist who recognized the need to combine nomotetic and idiographic cognition techniques in historical epistemology, as well as the importance of applying a sociological approach to the study of a complex of internally conditioned causes of the development of an integral social reality. The result of the synthesis of individualizing history and generalizing sociology M. M. Khvostov considered sociological history capable of neutralizing the purely theoretical nature of sociology and the purely empirical nature of history. Attention is drawn to the commitment of the professor, who aspired to the accuracy and infallibility of the results of scientific research, to the logical-cognitive model of positivism. Combining in his work strictly scientific methods of cognition with subjectivist methods (understanding, empathy), he nevertheless could not recognize the inevitability of distortion in the process of cognition of objective historical reality. The influence of the cultural-epistemological context of the turn of the XIX–XX centuries on the scientific worldview of M. M. Khvostov is noted and the conclusion is drawn about the secondary nature of his theoretical and methodological ideas borrowed from the works of European thinkers and the culture of science-making by professors of the Imperial Moscow University. The special significance of P. G. Vinogradov's "methodological school" is revealed, which influenced M. M. Khvostov's interpretations of the theory of history, the theory of cognition and the methodology of historical research. At the same time, it is emphasized that M. M. Khvostov surpassed his "scientific mentors" in the thoroughness and depth of the study of the factors of historical development. He saw the future of historical science in the integration of the theoretical potential, scientific apparatus and research tools of all social sciences, both socio-humanitarian and natural. Рассматривается процесс эволюции научного сознания М. М. Хвостова от историкаисследователя исторического факта и чисто эмпирического анализа его последствий к ученомуобществоведу, признавшему необходимость совмещения в исторической гносеологии приемов познания номотетических и идиографических дисциплин, а также важность применения социологического подхода при изучении комплекса внутренне обусловленных причин развития целостной социальной реальности. Результатом синтеза индивидуализирующей истории и генерализирующей социологии М. М. Хвостов считал социологическую историю, которая способна нейтрализовать сугубо теоретический характер социологии и сугубо эмпирический характер истории. Обращается внимание на приверженность профессора, стремившегося к точности и безошибочности результатов научного поиска, логико-познавательной модели позитивизма. Соединяя в своей работе строго научные методы познания с субъективистскими методами (понимание, эмпатия), он тем не менее так и не смог признать неизбежность искажения в процессе познания объективной исторической действительности. Отмечается влияние культурно-эпистемологического контекста рубежа XIX–XX вв. на научное мировоззрение М. М. Хвостова и выводится заключение о вторичности его теоретико-методологических представлений, заимствованных из работ европейских мыслителей и культуры наукотворчества профессоров Императорского Московского университета. Выявляется особая значимость «методологической школы» П. Г. Виноградова, повлиявшая на трактовки М. М. Хвостовым теории истории, теории познания и методики исторического исследования. Вместе с тем подчеркивается, что М. М. Хвостов превзошел своих «ученых наставников» в тщательности и глубине исследования факторов исторического развития. Будущее исторической науки он видел в интеграции теоретического потенциала, научного аппарата и исследовательского инструментария всех наук об обществе, как социогуманитарных, так и естественных.
15
Klimova, Olga V. "The first volume of <i>Roshia Ibun</i> 魯西亜異聞 [Unusual Narrative about Russia] as a source on Russian-Japanese relations in the beginning of the 19th c." Written Monuments of the Orient 10, № 2 (2024): 55–81. https://doi.org/10.55512/wmo634801.
Full textAbstract:
This article examines the first volume of Roshia Ibun 魯西亜異聞 [Unusual Narrative about Russia], a unique handwritten manuscript which depicts the story of a Japanese guard, Torizō. He was one of four Japanese guards who spent the winter of 1806 on the Sakhalin island monitoring the situation at Kushunkotan settlement. Lieutenant Nikolai Aleksandrovich Khvostov visited this settlement during his first expedition to Sakhalin in 1806. In his logbook he gave it an interesting name “Lyubopytstvo”, which can be translated into English as “Curiosity”. Curiously enough, this was the place where Khvostov and the four Japanese guards met for the first time. It is considered to be the first military clash between the countries and a turning point of Russian-Japanese relations, since Russia subsequently began to be perceived as a dangerous enemy. The first volume of the source gives especially valuable information about these events. It provides a detailed description of the voyage of the four Japanese captives to Kamchatka on board of a Russian ship, contains important information about the events during the second expedition of Khvostov and Davidov to Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands in 1807 and relates the trip of the four Japanese guards back to Japan. The first volume of Roshia Ibun, which has never been translated into Russian nor published yet, gives us answers to the following questions. Who was the guard Torizō? How did he perceive the meeting with the Russians in 1806? Were there any official messages or demands from Russian officers? How did Torizō manage to get back to Japan and did he have a chance to share his story with anyone else along the way?
16
Dovgy, Ol’ga L. "On Headings of Paroemias: or Who is the Principal in Khvostov’s Poetical World." Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 81, no. 6 (2022): 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s160578800023669-1.
Full textAbstract:
The article continues the series of author’s publications on Count D.I. Khvostov’s poetics and deals with the headings of the most famous Khvostov’s book (“Paroemi” of 1802). The titles are considered as an important element of the paratext, as a coherent system, organically connected with the other levels of the poetic world of the book. The table of contents is interpreted as a key that the author offers to the reader in order to give a general idea of the poetical world of the book and to divide the readers into “his own” (“congenial”) and “not his own” (“the other”). The article consists of two parts. In the first one, the titles, constructed according to the nominative principle, are comprehended as macrocosm and microcosm, in their mutual reflections. The experience of microphilological classification of headings is presented, the main semantic groups (people, animals, plants, natural phenomena, geographical objects, mythology) and subgroups within each section (for example, for people – profession, age, kinship, physical condition, etc.), key oppositions are pointed out; the use of “favorite&amp;8j1; techniques (four combinatorial operations, grammar games, etc.) in the titles is investigated. The second part of the article presents a grammatical agent, which actively intervenes in the coherent system of classification of titles and sets its own laws for connecting the elements of this system, – the conjunction “and”. Continuous combinatorial play, polyperspectivism makes Khvostov’s poetical world related to the world of emblematics and makes Count Khvostov one of the most emblematic authors.
17
Botova, Vera Ivanovna. "Kazan Branch of the Khvostov Dynasty and Descendants of Moscow Military Leader Aleksey Khvost: Evidence for Kinship." Manuskript, no. 4 (March 2021): 616–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.30853/mns210121.
Full text
18
Chechyk, V. "Kharkiv Scenography School of O. Khvostenko-Khvostov: The Experience of Professionalization." Vìsnik Harkìvsʹkoi deržavnoi akademìi dizajnu ì mistectv 2021, no. 02 (2021): 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.33625/visnik2021.02.085.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the early years of formation of Kharkiv scenography school and to the creative and pedagogical activities of Olexander Khvostenko-Khvostov (1895–1967). It was reported that the bold experiments of this artist, in the field of theatrical design of 1918–1922, made him one of the central figures of Kharkiv avant-garde scene (“Mystery Buff”; “The Army in the City”; “Lilyuli”, etc), strengthening the reputation of an innovator and causing the beginning of pedagogical activity at the Kharkiv Art College in 1921. The theatrical and decorative workshop was opened at the faculty of painting at the Kharkiv Art College in 1922, it was headed by A. Khvostenko-Khvostov. Among the first graduates were such bright alumni as A. Volnenko, P. Suponin, V. Ryftin, A. Bosulaev, B. Chernyshov, and others. Fundamental provisions of the educational program, which A. Khvostenko borrowed from the teaching practice of A. Exter (Kyiv Studio, 1918–1920), reflected the formation idea of future theater artist’s synthetic thinking. It is known that the education program of the Theater and Scenery Workshop of KAC, equally with the Studio of A. Exter, in addition to the subjects common to all students of painting and drawing faculty as special subjects (theatrical scenery, technique and technology of the stage, etc.) included also the history of theater (I. Turkeltaub), material culture, costume, music and literature (A. Beletsky). O. Khvostenko paid special attention to theoretical and practical issues of composition. He introduced the course of fundamentals of directing (V. Vasilko) as a compulsory subject. Much of what the students mastered at the Workshop was tested on the professional stages of Kharkiv theaters. Associated with the Kharkiv Art School for a quarter of a century (1921–1946), O. Khvostenko-Khvostov has not still been included in the pantheon of its outstanding teachers.
19
Egorov, A. A. "Category “Wrongdoings” in Psychological Theory of Law." Actual Problems of Russian Law, no. 9 (October 5, 2019): 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.106.9.019-026.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the analysis of the category of a wrongdoing within the psychological theory of law on the example of the works of outstanding Russian thinkers, namely: Lev (Leon) Iosifovich Petrazhitskiy and Veniamin Mikhailovich Khvostov. The author analyzes the interrelation between morality and law in the context of consequences of their violations that are reflected in ethical experiences, relapses of ethical processes and their perception by others. The author investigates laws of psychology that distinguish law from morality and forms of their manifestations. The paper analyzes and examines the definition of a wrongdoing given by Veniamin M. Khvostov and describes its signs: an act, wrongfulness, competency of the wrongdoer. The author analyzes the views of the researcher concerning subjective and objective elements of the wrongdoing and their forms by comparing with the legislative norms that were in force at that time of the Criminal Code adopted on March 22, 1903. To sum up, the author has made conclusions on the ground of the analysis of issues under consideration.
20
Lisitsyna, Galina G. "V.M. KHVOSTOV AND THE MOSCOW INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (1917-1922)." History and Archives 5, no. 1 (2023): 101–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2658-6541-2023-5-1-101-124.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes the little-studied documents on the history of the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology, founded on the initiative of Veniamin Mikhailovich Khvostov (1868–1920), a professor of Moscow University, a neo-Kantian philosopher, a doctor of Roman law, a sociologist; the paper also discusses his role in the development of sociology, the most important direction in the field of social sciences. The article was written on the basis of the documents that were retained by his collaborators Leonty Alekseevich Byzov (1886–1942) and his wife, Natalia Nikolaevna Fadeeva-Byzova (1892–1985). Currently, the records are kept in the Archives of the European University in St. Petersburg. After having ostentatiously left Moscow University in 1911 (the “Kasso Case”), just like many of his colleagues had done, he taught at Moscow Women’s Higher Courses and at Shanyavsky Moscow People’s University. In May 1917, during the rule of the Provisional Government, V.M.Khvostov managed to create the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology as part of the future Institute of Sociology, the main task of which was to carry out research on social processes and gradually turn sociology into an independent scientific discipline. The Institute existed for five years only (1917–1922), and the last two years – without V.M. Khvostov, who passed away at the beginning of 1920. V.M. Khvostov realized that without sociology, the science of social processes, the sprouts of which had just begun to appear in Russia, not only the social sciences, but the entire scientific community of the early twentieth century would lose out. He hoped that with the coming to power of the Provisional Government, the social life in all its manifestations would become an important phenomenon, including scientific research, free from ideological dogmas. Instead in October 1917, the country plunged into a different reality – the revolution and the victory of the Bolsheviks who gradually destroyed all illusions about the freedom of scientific choice. And nevertheless, the Institute continued to carry out a tremendous amount of research concerning the socio-psychological processes and phenomena in public life. The scope of that work could be perceived through many hours of meetings, questionnaires and survey forms, abstracts and reports, scientific disputes, practical work with the representatives of various social groups. However, gradually, the conditions imposed by the Soviet government turned out to become such a powerful irritant for V.M. Khvostov that the dream of forming sociology as an independent scientific discipline appeared to be unrealizable. And yet, the documents on the activities of the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology are of great historical and scientific value, their study and publication can contribute to the adding of the new pages in the history of Russian and Soviet science at the beginning of the 20th century.
21
Varentsova, Larisa. "Ladie’s department of the Nizhny Novgorod prison board of trustees (late 1911–1912): reasons for creation, functions, historical significance." Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2024, no. 3 (2024): 27–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.36511/2078-5356-2024-3-27-33.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the charitable activities of the «Ladies’ branch of the Nizhny Novgorod prison board», which in late 1911–1912 was headed by Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Khvostova, the wife of Nizhny Novgorod governor Alexei Nikolaevich Khvostov. During the entire existence of the Nizhny Novgorod prison committee (1846–1917) this was the first and only experience of the functioning of the Ladies’ department created under it. The novelty of this article lies in the formulation of the problem, the involvement of new historical sources. The chronological framework is determined by the time of operation of this charity. The main historical source was the Case of the Nizhny Novgorod provincial prison inspectorate “I” Office work. About the correspondence of the Nizhny Novgorod Ladies’ branch of the Society for the care of prisons in 1911. It is stored in the fund 386 Nizhny Novgorod prison inspectorate (1908–1918) of the Central archive of the Nizhny Novgorod region. Unpublished epistolary and clerical materials, reference materials, pre–revolutionary periodical press — the journal Prison bulletin were used. The author came to the conclusion that the main reason for the creation of the Ladies’ department of the Nizhny Novgorod prison committee was the fight against child crime, the need to open special educational and correctional institutions for detained children and juvenile delinquents, who were held mainly together with adult prisoners in prisons of the Russian empire at the beginning of the XX century. E. A. Khvostova was engaged in collecting charitable funds for the opening of a shelter located at the Second Nizhny Novgorod provincial prison, providing assistance to unhappy children. An important result of her work was the appearance of such a shelter with an elementary school, a children’s library, and craft workshops.
22
Kochukov, S. A. "The Russians in the Balkans in 1876 in the Light of the Personal Origin." Izvestiya of Saratov University. History. International Relations 9, no. 1 (2009): 65–68. https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-4907-2009-9-1-65-68.
Full textAbstract:
The article is dedicated to the memoir heritage of the Serbian war of 1876. The author considers the forming of the views of Russian society on the Balkan conflict and analyses memoirs of V.D. Palenov, A.N. Khvostov, V.P. Mescherskey, N.N. Durnovo. The memoirs represent the actions of Russian volunteers in the Serbian army, the volunteers’ heroism, and shows the concept of the war from ordinary soldiers’ point of view.
23
Kurochkin, Alexander Valentinovich. "PUSHKIN’S SUMMONSES FOR MEETINGS OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY." Vremennik Pushkinskoi Komissii 38 (2024): 5–26. https://doi.org/10.31860/0236-2481-2024-38-5-26.
Full textAbstract:
This article introduces into scientifi c circulation Pushkin’s printed summonses for meetings of the Russian Academy found in the archive of Count D. Khvostov; these documents should be considered when publishing Pushkin’s correspondence in the complete collection of his works. A number of points related to the academic meetings of 1833—1834, attended or commented upon by Pushkin, are clarifi ed. The relationship of the poet with members of the Academy P. Katenin and P. Svinin is also traced.
24
Lisitsyna, Galina G. "The History of the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology (Based on Materials from Institute Meeting Reports. 1917–1924)." Sociological Journal 26, no. 3 (2020): 172–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2020.26.3.7400.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this article is to draw the attention of specialists in the field of social sciences to a unique collection of documents at Moscow’s Institute of social psychology (1917–1924) created by V.M. Khvostov — a legislative science expert, philosopher, sociologist, who set himself the task of separating sociology and making it a specialized scientific discipline. The only work to date devoted to the Institute was an article written by its employee L.A. Byzov in 1923 (published in 2011), where he speaks about the history of the Institute, its development, achievements and failures from the point of view of a person who knows the situation from the inside. This makes it invaluable in terms of studying the history of the Institute of social psychology, in this work in particular, which provides more detailed information about the activities of V.M. Khvostov, the Institute’s employees and specialists involved in its work. These people were actually performing a scientific feat, creating a new direction in the field of social sciences, working in the extremely difficult conditions of the post-revolutionary era. The content and completeness of those of the Institute’s protocols which found their way into our hands, them currently being stored in the archives of the European University in St. Petersburg, are worthy of a full-fledged scientific publication that could write another page in the history of Russian sociology.
25
Imamutdinova, Albina, Nikita Kuvshinov, Elena Venidiktova, and Anfisa Ibragimova. "The Kazan Period in the Life of the Historian V.M. Khvostov." Journal of Educational and Social Research 9, no. 4 (2019): 227–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jesr-2019-0076.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov is one of the famous, thoroughly educated Russian historians. In his scientific heritage are widely represented lots of works on the history of diplomacy and international relations, on the study of major problems of General and national history. He himself defined that the most important secret of his life was his childhood and the inspiration for the poetry of the “Prophet”, the poem of Alexander Pushkin, the father of modern Russian literature. This poem was the most unusual incident in a highly Christian society two centuries ago, with its poet, the most unusual figure among the elite and the aristocracy. Poetry and poetry presented a transformative image of the Prophet that did not conform to the official description of the Gospel and the Torah, but rather resembled the Muslim definitions of their Prophet. The poem became the symbol of one of the greatest Russian intellectuals to rebel against the rule of the Church-Torah system in European societies, and as a result Pushkin was even excommunicated by the Council of Bishops of the Orthodox Church, but escaped the deadly tsarist reign of his youth.Among them are the doctoral dissertation “Foreign policy of the German Empire in the last years of the chancellorship of Bismarck”, articles on the history of international relations in the middle East in the late XIX century, the manuscript of the 2nd volume “History of diplomacy”, the introduction to the book “History of foreign policy of the USSR”, numerous articles and reports on various issues of foreign policy of the USSR and international relations.Article is devoted to the famous historian, scientist and public figure academician Vladimir Mikhaylovich Hvostov, describes his educational experience on the basis of archive documents. The research also covers Vladimir Mikhaylovich Hvostov’s early professional development. Further development of his life should be continued through detailed studying the personal fund of V.M. Hvostov which is located in Russian Academy of Science Archive.
26
Novikov, Mikhail, and Tatyana Perfilova. "“It was a man of labor”: in memory of M.M. Khvostov." OOO "Zhurnal "Voprosy Istorii" 2020, no. 10-4 (2020): 166–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.31166/voprosyistorii202010statyi84.
Full textAbstract:
The publication is devoted to the analysis of the scientific work of the famous Russian historian, a graduate of the Imperial Moscow University, M.M. Khvostov, who made a serious contribution to the development of theoretical and methodological foundations of historical science, as well as to the study of socio-economic problems of the historical process in ancient civilizations and especially in Hellenistic Egypt. Previously unexplored aspects of its scientific and professional culture are revealed. An application is formulated for the creation of a detailed study on the image of historical science in the interpretation of the kazan professor within the framework of the “new” history of intellectual thought.
27
Dovgiy, O. "“And You are Deep, Playful and Different…”: Notes on Count Khvostov’ Poetics." Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 79, no. 5 (2020): 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s241377150012295-7.
Full text
28
Dubrovskaya, Svetlana A., and Oleg E. Osovsky. ""Otets zubastykh golubey...": lichnost' i tvorchestvo grafa D.I. Khvostova na fone russkoy poezii ["The father of toothy pigeons...": the personality and works of Count D.I. Khvostov against the background of Russian poetry]. Book Review: Vinitskiy, I. (2017) Graf Sardinskiy: Dmitriy Khvostov i russian culture." Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, no. 51 (February 1, 2018): 257–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/19986645/51/20.
Full text
29
Trakhtenberg, Lev A. "D.I. Fonvizin in the Journal Polemics of 1805–1806." Literary Fact 2, no. 36 (2025): 298–313. https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-8297-2025-36-298-313.
Full textAbstract:
The paper shows that in 1805–1806, there was a discussion about Denis Fonvizin’s oeuvre and personality in Russian literary magazines. He was mentioned by Nikolai Brusilov’s Zhurnal rossiiskoi slovesnosti, Ivan Martynov’s Severnyi vestnik, Aleksei Varentsov’s Zhurnal dlia pol’zy i udovol’stviia and Drug prosveshcheniia edited by Pavel Golenishchev-Kutuzov, Grigorii Saltykov and Dmitrii Khvostov. At the same time, Zhurnal dlia pol’zy i udovol’stviia and Mikhail Kachenovskii’s Vestnik Evropy published Fonvizin’s works, which had remained in manuscript. Although Fonvizin (1745–1792) was near-contemporary, he was already unanimously recognised as a classic writer. In two articles printed in February and March 1805, Brusilov equalled him to Molière, including him in a list of the best Russian men of letters together with Karamzin. This was probably more to honour the latter than the former, as Karamzin’s reputation as an exemplary author, accepted by many, including Brusilov himself, was questioned by their literary rivals — the Archaists led by Alexander Shishkov. The discussion began around Fonvizin’s person- ality. In June, Severnyi vestnik came forward with an anecdote that illustrated not only his wit but also the self-command he showed when facing illness. Zhurnal dlia pol’zy i udovol’stviia criticized this anecdote in a July review and in September published Fonvizin’s Discourse on the Vain Life of Man, written in his later years, which demonstrated another side of his character — his Christian humility. The same view on Fonvizin was reflected in an entry about him for the dictionary of Russian writers by Bishop Eugene (Bolkhovitinov), which appeared at the same time, in September 1805, in Drug prosveshcheniia. This entry also mentioned the playwright’s vision of language, presenting him as a predecessor of the Archaists in recognising Church Slavonic as a basis of Russian. Then, in April and May 1806, Fonvizin’s letters from France to General Pyotr Panin came out in Vestnik Evropy. They expressed a highly critical view on French life and national character, so at the moment, shortly after Napoleon’s army defeated the Russians at Austerlitz, the publication was quite in tune with the times. Simultaneously, in April 1806, Khvostov’s ode To Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin was printed in Drug prosveshcheniia. Its author, a staunch Classicist, addressed Fonvizin as a supposed ally in his satire on Russian morals and letters of today. Notably, at the time of heated literary debate as it was, all who wrote about Fonvizin, from the Karamzinist Brusilov to the Shishkovist Khvostov, were united in his highest esteem. Everyone appealed to his works and his very image, attempting to strengthen their positions with his authority. The diverse interpretations of his legacy were possible so long as admiration for him was universal.
30
Klimova, Olga V. "<i>Yasōdokugo</i> 野叟獨語 [<i>A Monologue of an Elderly Rural Man</i>] by Sugita Genpaku as a Source on Early Russian-Japanese Relations". Written Monuments of the Orient 9, № 2 (2023): 57–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.55512/wmo567986.
Full textAbstract:
This study introduces and examines the work of Sugita Genpaku (20.10.1733–01.06.1817) — Yasōdokugo 野叟獨語 [A monologue of an elderly rural man] —a valuable historical document that describes the reaction of the Japanese government to the expedition of Khvostov and Davidov to Sakhalin in 1806–1807. It was written at the beginning of the 19thc., the period which is considered a turning point in the early Russian-Japanese relations, when Russia began to be perceived as a major dangerous enemy. This unique document, which is hardly ever mentioned in research, stands out in the long list of Japanese archival documents of the 19thc. as one of the very few that depict Russia as a possible trade partner and not an enemy. It was originally written by Sugita Genpaku in 1807 and was published for the first time in 1934 as a part of the multi-volume book called Dainippon shisō zenshū 大日本思想全集 [Complete collection of intellectual history works of Great Japan]. Nevertheless, it has been ignored by most scholars throughout the world, including those in Russia and Japan. This study introduces the most interesting parts of the work, which describe the response of the Japanese government to the actions of two Russian officers, lieutenant Khvostov (1776–1809) and midshipman Davidov (1784?–1809), in Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands in 1806 and 1807. This article answers the following questions: what was the image of Russia in Japan? What impact did the expedition to Sakhalin have on Japanese government and society? What was the best way to address the challenges Japan was facing and could trade with Russia help to solve them?
31
Grigoryan, Bella. "Graf Sardinskii: Dmitrii Khvostov i russkaia kul´tura by Il´ia Vinitskii (review)." Pushkin Review 24, no. 1 (2022): 107–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pnr.2022.a903275.
Full text
32
Kondratyeva, Mariia. "THE INFLUENCE OF THE ENVOY REZANOV’ S ACTIONS ON THE OUTCOME OF THE EMBASSY MISSION AND ON THE SUBSEQUENT EVENTS IN RUSSO-JAPANESE RELATIONS." Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS, no. 2 (24) (2023): 22–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-022-030.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines the influence of the personality of the Russian ambassador Nikolai Petrovich Rezanov on Russian-Japanese relations. The embassy of Nikolai Petrovich Rezanov to Japan ended in failure and gave rise to new sad events in Russian-Japanese relations. Among such events are the Khvostov incident (also known as the Rezanov-Davydov-Khvostov incident), when some Japanese villages and crafts on Sakhalin were robbed and burned, and the Golovnin incident, when the Russian navigator Vasily Mikhailovich Golovnin was captured by the Japanese and held in captivity for two years. The author made an attempt to find out the role of the personality of the envoy in all the listed events. An analysis of historiography has shown that researchers have repeatedly turned to the results of Rezanov’s embassy and to the analysis of his personality, coming to opposite conclusions about the envoy’s absolute guilt or complete innocence in the failure of the mission. The involvement of a wide range of sources, as well as the use of the induction method, allowed the author to come to new conclusions: the failure was not in one, but in a complex of reasons. Along with such reasons as poorly selected goods and the prejudiced attitude of the Japanese of that time towards the Russian people, the actions of Nikolai Petrovich influenced the failure of the mission. However, the main role was played by the isolation policy of the Japanese state, which, having begun in the middle of the 17th century, was firmly entrenched in Japanese society. As for the role of the envoy in relations with Japan, it is greatest in the sad story of the robbery of Japanese villages, which had a negative impact on relations with Japan.
33
Arena, Serena E., та Roland Speith. "Porosity models for pre-planetesimals: modified P-α like models and the effect of dissipated energy". Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 6, S276 (2010): 395–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1743921311020497.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe outcome of collisions between pre-planetesimals is important in the theory of planetesimal formation by collisional growth and strongly depends on their internal structure. Since pre-planetesimals are highly porous, reaching 90% porosity, they could show the so called anomalous behaviour (decrease of density during shock compression, e.g. Bolkhovitinov & Khvostov 1978). Due to involved sizes (>dm), laboratory experiments are unfeasible therefore numerical simulations equipped with adequate porosity models are necessary.Here we focus on the P-α model and its variations. We found that they are suitable for applications in the high porosity range only after a modification of the basic equations, that avoids an inconsistency and takes into account the effect of dissipated energy, is performed.
34
Botova, V. I. "Legend and truth about the builder of the Makariev-unzhenskiy monastry elder David Khvostov." History: facts and symbols 43, no. 2 (2025): 51–78. https://doi.org/10.24888/2410-4205-2025-43-2-51-78.
Full text
35
Gruzdinskaya, V. S., M. V. Kovalev, and V. V. Tikhonov. "THE FIGURE OF AN INTERNATIONAL HISTORIAN IN THE SOVIET PEACEKEEPING MOVEMENT IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 1940s – 1980s." Вестник Пермского университета. История 63, no. 4 (2023): 81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-4-81-92.
Full textAbstract:
The paper examines the role of international historians within the Soviet peacekeeping movement from the sec-ond half of the 1950s to the 1980s, with a particular focus on the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Af-fairs. By analyzing published materials and archival documents from the Archive of the Russian Academy of Scienc-es, the study explores the intellectual contributions of international historians to the organizational, rhetorical, and ideological aspects of the peacekeeping movement formation. The authors focuses on prominent figures, such as V.M. Khvostov, a historian of diplomacy, V.G. Trukhanovsky, a British Studies scholar, E.M. Primakov, an expert in Arab Studies, G.A. Arbatov, an Americanist, A.N. Glinkin, a specialist in the Latin American Studies, and A.M. Vasiliev and V.B. Kokorev, Africanists. The research challenges the notion that historical symbols played a signifi-cant role in Soviet peacekeeping rhetoric, highlighting instead that international historians primarily acted as analysts of contemporary international relations, rarely drawing on the past as a symbolic resource. The figure of an interna-tional historian performing a diplomatic mission reflects the specifics of the Soviet disciplinary structure, where in-ternational relations have been integrated into historical disciplines since the time of Stalin. Khvostov personified this tradition. The authors trace the evolution of themes discussed at the Pugwash conferences and how Soviet representa-tion within these conferences changed depending on this. While the early conferences focused on the threat of nucle-ar war and the prospects for disarmament, the range of topics expanded noticeably in subsequent years. For example, since the mid-1970s, African problems have gained increasing prominence in the activities of the Pugwash move-ment, requiring the involvement of relevant specialists. The paper demonstrates the evolution of Soviet analytics of international relations presented at the Pugwash conferences, transitioning from ideologized techniques and analyti-cal structures in the spirit of the 1940s to a more modern and pragmatic approach. This shift indicates an increasing level of expertise among Soviet historians of international relations.
36
Ivinskiy, Aleksandr D. "On Mikhail Muravyov’s Poem The Painter (Based on Materials of Russian State Library and Institute of Russian Literature)." Two centuries of the Russian classics 3, no. 2 (2021): 168–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2021-3-2-168-185.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the textual reconstruction of the poem The Painter by M. N. Muravyov. It was published in “Academic News” in 1779. In the Manuscripts Department of the Russian State Library (Moscow), we have found the earliest manuscript of this work, which we date 1775. This variant differs greatly from the final one – both in terms of volume and style. In the Manuscript Department of the Institute of Russian Literature (St. Petersburg), we found the second version of The Painter, written, as we claim, in 1778. It was stored with Muravyov’s letters to Dmitry Khvostov. Such close attention of the author to this poem could be explained by the fact that he expressed in it some crucial ideas about the nature of creativity and about the principles of interaction with the authorities. From our point of view, The Painter is one of Muravyov’s key texts, in which he acclaimed his loyalty to the cultural policy of Catherine II.
37
Imamutdinova, A. M. "The History of International Relations in the Legacy of the Soviet Historian Vladimir M. Khvostov (1905–1972)." Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue, no. 3 (September 13, 2023): 210–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.53658/rw2022-3-3(9)-210-231.
Full textAbstract:
In the article, based on a large number of archival documents, some of which were first put into scientific circulation, the research activities and problems of scientific research by V.M.Khvostov are considered. The author analyzed two main directions in the work of the scientist: the history of diplomacy and international relations; problems of general and national history (mainly the events of world wars). The contribution of V.M.Khvostov to the study of this issue is determined, his creative biography is considered as one of the models of the life and career of a scientist in the Soviet political and historiographic space.
38
Komleva, E. V. "Note by the Tomsk Civil Governor Vasiliy S. Khvostov «About the City of Turukhansk and the Turukhansk uyezd» (1806)." NORTHERN ARCHIVES AND EXPEDITIONS 3, no. 2 (2019): 6–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.31806/2542-1158-2019-3-2-6-16.
Full text
39
Pavlova, T. "Avant-garde artists at the Kharkiv Art School: Vasyl Yermilov and Boris Kosarev." Vìsnik Harkìvsʹkoi deržavnoi akademìi dizajnu ì mistectv 2021, no. 02 (2021): 71–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.33625/visnik2021.02.071.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with the formation of avant-garde as an alternative to the academic artistic paradigm in the Kharkiv Art School. The contribution of Kharkiv artists to the world culture is determined primarily by the avant-garde art. Its agents, who steadily carried the baton of modernization of artistic culture, were V. Yermilov and B. Kosarev. During 1915–1916 a group of artists, The Union of Seven, was formed at the Art School; their work reflected the diverse palette of changes that accompanied the formation of Cubo-Futurism in Kharkiv. Fundamental changes took place in the artistic culture of Ukraine in the 1920s. The initiative to transform Kharkiv Art School into an Art Technical School with the rights of an institution of higher education in 1921, is attributed to Yermilov (it actually became an institute in 1927). In the 1920s–1930s his teaching team was joined by such artists as Mykola Burachek, Ivan Padalka, Oleksander Khvostenko-Khvostov, Anatol Petrytsky, and Borys Kosarev. Studios were established: easel painting (Mykhailo Sharonov), monumental (Lev Kramarenko), and theatrical (Oleksander Khvostenko-Khvostov). From 1922 to 1934 Yermilov led the graphics studio (together with Padalka starting in 1925). The key figures in the creation process of artistic avant-garde culture in Kharkiv after the 1930s were V. Yermilov and B. Kosarev, who influenced the formation of the next generation of artists. Yermilov’s work in Kharkiv (including teaching at Art Institute) had an impact on the creative features of O. Shcheglov, V. Platonov, V. Savenkov, and defined the horizon of effective development of design in the region. Among those who continued Yermilov’s design traditions are M. Molochynsky, І. Krivoruchko, V. Lesnyak, O. Bojchuk, V. Danilenko, O. Veklenko. Launched by the latter International Environmental Forum of Eco Poster “The 4th Block” has found quite a resonance in the world. “Yermilov’s Mansard” appeared on Kharkiv cultural space as an artistic centre and an original example of artistic design in the spirit of Bauhaus. Due to B. Kosarev a constellation of talented artists appeared in Kharkiv artistic culture and defined its uniqueness. Among his students in the theatre and decorative department there were such people as a teacher Konstantinov; a theater artist, a Doctor of Architecture, corresponding member of the AAU V. Kravetz; the Main artist of Kharkiv State Academic Ukrainian Drama Theater named after T. Shevchenko T. Medvid; theatre artists M. Kuzheliev, G. Nesterovska, P. Osnachuk, L. Pisarenko, N. Rudenko-Krayevska and others. Among the artists, whose creative work shaped under the influence of B. Kosarev, were Honoured Artist of Ukraine, member and Vice President of AAU V. Sidorenko, and Honored Artist of Ukraine, famous graphic N. Myronenko.
40
Svyatoslavsky, Alexey V. "Nature Images in Russian Odic Poetry of the 18th – Early 19th Centuries: Functional Role and Influence on the Further Literary Process." Two centuries of the Russian classics 3, no. 2 (2021): 40–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2021-3-2-40-61.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the functional role of nature images in the formation of the imaginary structure of Russian odic poetry of the 18th – early 19th centuries. Examples are taken from the odic poetry of Mikhail Lomonosov, Vasily Trediakovsky, Alexander Sumarokov, Mikhail Kheraskov, Gavrila Derzhavin, Dmitry Khvostov. An attempt was undertaken to answer two questions: the place nature images occupied in odic poetry in the era of its pride and, secondly, the possibility to find in the poetry of classicism, despite the condescending attitude towards it that developed later in the history of Russian literature, something that constituted an organic part of the Russian classics of the 19th and 20th centuries. The functional role of nature images in the odic genre is shown, which, as it seemed, by definition is alien to natural themes, being organically connected with the pathos of civic consciousness and the appeal to the themes of heroism, great personalities, and historical events. However, as it turns out in a number of cases, the very objects of nature evoke the poet's admiration as an impressive work of the Creator, in others, nature is a background that in a certain way enhances the impression of the very historical events that constitute the subject of odic poetry. The conclusion is made about a certain continuity in the depiction of nature – from odic poetry to Russian lyric poetry and prose of the 19th and 20th centuries.
41
Baturenko, Svetlana A. "Development of feministic ideas within the Neo-Kantian direction of the Russian sociology of the 19th - early 20th centuries: Lev Petrazhitsky, Veniamin Khvostov." Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 425 (December 1, 2017): 66–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/15617793/425/8.
Full text
42
Smoliarova, Tatiana. "Graf Sardinskii: Dmitrii Khvostov i russkaia kul΄tura. By Il΄ia Vinitskii. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2017. 352 pp. Bibliography. Index. ₽420, hard bound." Slavic Review 78, no. 01 (2019): 278–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/slr.2019.65.
Full text
43
Ognieva, T. K. "ARTISTIC AND FIGURATIVE STATEMENTS IN UKRAINIAN SCENOGRAPHY OF THE XX CENTURY." UKRAINIAN CULTURAL STUDIES, no. 2(9) (2021): 67–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).13.
Full textAbstract:
The article "Artistic and figurative statements in the Ukrainian scenography of the XX century" analyzes the conditions and factors of develop- ment of the art of theater and scenography as a component during the XX century in Ukraine. The scenographic space provides an opportunity to synthesize elements of plastic arts to create an artistic and figurative solution and to form the emotional climate of a theatrical performance. During the development of the art of theater, an evolution of the scenography took place. The level of scenography in Ukraine in the 1920s and 1930s not only corresponded to the standards of the world art, but also exceeded its value orientations, provided the key to understanding artistic searches and discoveries on a global scale. Ukrainian scenographers offered independent artistic and figurative solutions of performances. In the scenography of the 1920s, O. Khvostenko-Khvostov used various means of design of space – construction, painting, fabrics, mobile machine, banner, film projection, light, photomontage, etc. A. Petritskyi even managed to give constructivism diversity and emotionality, perfectly synthesize the spatio-temporal characteristics of theatrical art, forming an artistic and figurative solution of the play. W. Meller's work in the 20s-30s of the XXth century is also an example of artistic figurative stage design of the play and the most fruitful inter- pretation of European innovative trends on the basis of Ukrainian theatrical art. The "social realism" style approved by the influenced the develop- ment of Ukrainian culture; in theatrical art and, in particular, scenography, we observe a gradual departure from the artistic and figurative organiza- tion of the stage towards realistic reproduction of the place of action. Thus, the legacy of V. Meller, A. Petritskyi and O. Khvostenko-Khvostov before and after World War II is not distinguished by innovative, ex- traordinary stage solutions, which is explained by objective reasons. D. Borovskyi was one of the first scenographers of the post – war period who demonstrated artistic and figurative interpretation of dramatic material in Ukraine. Myron Kyprian has a special place among the artists of the stage, whose creative work of the 60s – 70s of the XX century abounds in artistic and figurative solutions of performances. We emphasize that the Ukrainian scenography in the 50's – 60's generally corresponded to the basic principles of the style of socialist realism. Most artists of the stage used standard techniques, but there were also artistic and figurative scenographic solutions that stood out from the general usual practice. The process of liberation of art in general and theatrical in particular has shifted and is constantly evolving towards getting rid of the dictates of worldview principles and aesthetic systems that determined the ways of development of art in previous years. The solution of the problems of visu- alization of the artistic and figurative organization of the stage space is the principle of universalism of the stage environment, plastic embodiment of ideas. At the end of the XXth century artists turned to a variety of artistic techniques in an effort to embody the symbolic subtext and philosophi- cal content of the dramatic material by enriching the palette of expressive and technical means. The scenography system combines various ele- ments, visual and plastic characteristics of materials to metaphorize the action. The large-scale, monumental plastic embodiment of the main idea of the artist – scenographer coexists with the empty space of the stage. At the end of the twentieth century we observe the mutual enrichment and spiritual growth of artists – scenographers who form the artistic and figurative solution of the play and the audience, able to perceive and care about the metaphorical symbolic sphere of plastic – spatial coordinates of the play.
44
Vezhbovska, Liliana, and Natalia Udris-Borodavko. "Dedicated to the Jubilee Dates of 2020 – the 125th Anniversary of the Birth of Oleksandr Khvostenko-Khvostov (April 4, 1895) and Anatolii Petrytskyi (January 31, 1895.)." Demiurge: Ideas, Technologies, Perspectives of Design 3, no. 1 (2020): 6–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.31866/2617-7951.3.1.2020.207526.
Full text
45
Kurochkin, A. V. "«…The Nephew Was Young, and the Uncle Was Gentle…» (A. S. Pushkin and his Uncle in the Letters of the Contemporaries to Count D. I. Khvostov)." Russkaya literatura 1 (2020): 79–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.31860/0131-6095-2020-1-79-92.
Full textAbstract:
Analyzing the unknown contemporary testimonies about A. S. Pushkin and his uncle, the author of the article iterates a number of events and offers new data on their lives and work: he establishes the name of the uncle’s, as well as, possibly, of S. L. Pushkin’s — teacher of Russian literature, V. S. Podshivalov; confi rms the existence of V. L. Pushkin’s lost works — poem «The Holy Fool» and the continuation of «The Perilous Neighbor», the content of which is supposedly echoed in «Eugene Onegin»; confirms the acquaintance of A. S. Pushkin with the mother and stepfather of V. F. Vyazemskaya and substantiates the fact of his visit to their house in June 1830; provides new data on the death of V. L. Pushkin and on his funeral; specifi es the date of A. S. Pushkin’s move to an apartment at Furshtatskaya Street in May 1832; reveals the circumstances of the publication of Notes by V. L. Pushkin, copy of which was acquired by A. S. Pushkin.
46
Vezhbovska, Liliana, and Natalia Udris-Borodavko. "Dedicated to the Jubilee Dates of 2020 – the 125th Anniversary of the Birth of Oleksandr Khvostenko-Khvostov (April 4, 1895) and Anatolii Petrytskyi (January 31, 1895.)." Demiurge: Ideas, Technologies, Perspectives of Design 3, no. 1 (2020): 6–8. https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-7951.3.1.2020.207526.
Full textAbstract:
This issue of the journal is thematic. It covers topics raised in the all-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference "100 years of modernity: the Bauhaus and Ukrainian avant-garde". The authors of the articles focus their attention on the discovery and reinterpretation of ideas and methods of design of both artistic paradigms in the context of modern theory and practice. Their innovativeness and significance are indisputable. At the same time, if the Bauhaus has become a world legend, and the role of the school as the founder of modern design and architecture is a priori recognized by all experts, the phenomenon of the Ukrainian avant-garde still requires close attention, publicity, discovery of its identity and recognition of the status of the world heritage in design.
47
Sinitsyn, Aleksandr. "Traditional Japanese Weapons Dating Back to the Trophies of the Expedition Headed by N.A. Khvostov and G.I. Davydov in the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the Russian Academy of Sciences." Kunstkamera 13, no. 3 (2021): 70–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.31250/2618-8619-2021-3(13)-70-88.
Full text
48
Lyamin, S. K., and V. A. Lovtsov. "I.A. Tarasenko-Otreshkov and N. Yu. Shilder-Shuldner: factors of career failure of vice-governors in the Russian Empire of the early XX century." Herald of an archivist, no. 1 (2025): 186–203. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2025-1-186-203.
Full textAbstract:
The relevance of the article is due to the need to generalize the experience of personnel policy of the highest provincial administration during the period of management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs by P. A. Stolypin. The article analyzes the career factors that prevented Tambov vice-governors I. A. Tarasenko-Otreshkov and N. Yu. Shilder-Shuldner from receiving an independent gubernatorial appointment. The source base of the study was made up of personal files and form lists of officials, as well as memoirs of governors and vice-governors. In the case of N. Yu. Shilder-Shuldner, despite his outstanding business qualities, a negative career factor was his addiction to gambling, and in the case of I. A. Tarasenko-Otreshkov, intrigues against the Tambov governor N. P. Muratov manifested themselves. The negative impact of conflicts with the incumbent governor on the subsequent independent gubernatorial appointment was revealed, but in some cases such behavior of the governor can be considered as an element of career strategy - as in the case of the future Minister of Internal Affairs A. N. Khvostov during his conflict with Tula Governor M. M. Osorgin, associated with the revolutionary events of 1905-1907. The personal influence of P. A. Stolypin on personnel policy and individual appointments is noted, the role of his patronage is emphasized. It is established that the position of vice-governor was of an intermediate nature before an independent gubernatorial appointment. It made it possible to detect the lack of professional qualities necessary for independent administrative activity in candidates for governor. These qualities included a lack of initiative, a tendency to conflict, and low professional preparation for office. In the era of P. A. Stolypin it was especially important, because after the events of 1905-1907 the authority of the central government required special support, so the requirements for candidates for the highest administrative positions in the province increased. In the practice of personnel policy, an important criterion for selecting candidates for governor was administrative experience, which the vice-governor position allowed to obtain. A favorable review of the incumbent governor was of great importance. The practice of selecting candidates for governor was formed, but it was quite often violated due to protectionism, which allowed officials with insufficient business qualities to occupy positions in the highest provincial administration. We can say that the personnel policy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in this period was affected by the general processes of modernization of society that characterized the Russian Empire in the early 20th century.
49
Koptelova, Nataliya G. "Bartenev’s Trace in A. I. Gotovtseva’s Creative Work." Two centuries of Russian classics 6, no. 1 (2024): 38–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2024-6-1-38-73.
Full textAbstract:
The article shows how Yu. N. Bartenev influenced the work of poetess A. I. Gotovtseva. Bartenev appears as a bright, multifaceted, and contradictory person. The article proves that Gotovtseva’s communication with Bartenev became one of the significant factors in her creative self-determination and artistic development. The poetic messages of Gotovtseva to Bartenev were created at different times but indicate that the mentor’s influence on the poetess has not weakened over the years. The article notes that Bartenev’s trace in Gotovtseva’s poetry is also represented in latent form. As an example of such a representation, we consider Gotovtseva’s poems, which refer to the personality and work of A. P. Khvostova, who is part of Bartenev’s closest spiritual circle (“Khvostova, the new Prometheus...” and “Fireplace”). The article demonstrates that Bartenev’s influence largely shaped Gotovtseva’s literary taste and determined the peculiarities of her axiology and poetics.
50
金, 時德. "Khvostov's military expedition and "Hokkai Idan"." JOURNAL OF ASIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 131 (June 30, 2015): 161. http://dx.doi.org/10.17856/jahs.2015.06.131.161.
Full text