Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / «Kosygin reforms» / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: «Kosygin reforms».

Journal articles on the topic '«Kosygin reforms»'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 5 June 2025

Last updated: 16 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 38 journal articles for your research on the topic '«Kosygin reforms».'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Belykh, A. A., and V. A. Mau. "Economic reforms in the USSR: 1921—1985." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 11 (November 8, 2023): 81–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-11-81-108.

Full text

Abstract:

The paper deals with the theory and practical experience of Soviet economic reforms in 1921—1985. The authors discuss current literature on the subject and suggest methodological tools for the analysis of Soviet economic reforms, their stages and conceptions. Special attention is paid to the “new economic policy” of the 1920s (nep) and “Kosygin reform” of 1965. The authors figure out three basic concepts of Soviet reforms: improvement of planning administration, development of the key indicator of economic performance, and complex improvements of the economic mechanism

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Abramova, U. A., and A. E. Dmitriev. "Economic transformations of the Perestroika period: 1985-1991's." Izvestiya MGTU MAMI 7, no. 1-6 (2013): 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/2074-0530-67763.

Full text

Abstract:

The article considers the economic policy pursued by the last Soviet leader M.S. Gorbachev. The authors carry out a periodization of economic reforms 1985-1991, emphasizing three stages of reforms. The ineffectiveness of the attempts to give planned economy a new impetus (“acceleration”) forced M. S. Gorbachev to use the idea of Kosygin reform, providing the economic independence for enterprises and then skip to the plan of imposing the regulated market. Such contradictions and inconsistencies of conducted economic course became one of the reasons for the collapse of the USSR.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Bryson, Phillip J. "Perestroika, Phase III: Can the USSR Learn from the Only Successful Reform?" Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies, no. 904 (January 1, 1991): 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/cbp.1991.51.

Full text

Abstract:

In Phase I of Mikhail Gorbachev's tenure as chief director of Soviet economic strategy, the General Secretary seemed content to continue an approach his predecessors had referred to as plan "perfecting" (sovershenstvovanie). This approach which called merely for the development and implementation of modest improvements in the planning mechanism. It was the chosen alternative to economic reform, the approach which had been peremptorily rejected with the closing of the Kosygin reforms at the end of the 1960s.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

GVISHIANI, D. M. "ECONOMIC REFORM OF A.N. KOSYGIN - STRATEGIC GOALS AND REASONS FOR CURTAILING REFORMS." Bulletin of the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry. International Law, no. 1 (2022): 64–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.54449/76585_2022_1_16_64.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Mau, V. A. "Economic reforms in the USSR: The last act (1985—1991). On the 40th anniversary of perestroika." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 7 (July 9, 2025): 49–81. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-7-49-81.

Full text

Abstract:

Perestroika (restructuring) was the last of three large-scale attempts to reform the Soviet economy on the basis of market principles. Similar to the previous two attempts (the NEP and the Kosygin economic reform of 1965), it failed to produce a sustainable result but led to the aggravation of political problems. However, unlike the previous two, perestroika ended with the collapse of the entire Soviet system. The paper deals with the processes of unfolding of the economic crisis, objective problems of the Soviet model and mistakes of economic policy in 1985—1991. The author discusses the principal possibility of implementation of market reforms while remaining within the framework of the Soviet political system. Special attention is paid to the logic and consistency of socio-economic policy, the correlation of macroeconomic, institutional, and structural transformations. The sources of the systemic crisis and the first programs to overcome it are considered as well.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Rubin, Marc. "Self-interest and the kosygin reforms: Finding new wine in old bottles." Journal of Comparative Economics 14, no. 3 (1990): 473–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-5967(90)90062-e.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Nikulin, Alexander. "Agriculturist V.G. Venzher in the Search of Reforming the Soviet Union." Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 92, S3 (2022): S174—S181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s101933162209009x.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract On the anniversary of the centenary of the formation of the Soviet Union, we naturally remember the name and ideas of one of the most brilliant Soviet agricultural economists, who made a huge practical and theoretical contribution to attempts to reform not only Soviet agriculture but also Soviet society as a whole. Vladimir Grigoryevich Venzher (1899–1990) was an agriculturist and economist, who primarily became widely known for his correspondence with Stalin in the early 1950s about the possibilities of reforms in the collective farm system of the Soviet Union. At the same time, the fact that his personality was much broader and deeper than his professional incarnation as an agrarian economist. Venzher, of course, was also an original and deep social thinker, partly Marxist and partly populist-cooperative, who repeatedly proposed to the Soviet leadership and then in relation to the Kosygin and Gorbachev reforms a number of comprehensive alternative reforms aimed at shaping the sustainable development of the Soviet Union and Russia based primarily on the required agrarian reforms.1 To prove and develop this statement, this article examines several key fragments of the political economy and social and philosophical heritage of Venzher in the 1960s–1980s, his letters to the Central Committee of the CPSU, and some of his scientific monographs, which have not yet attracted much attention from researchers.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Lipkin, Mikhail. "The Kosygin Reforms: a “Window of Opportunity” for the Soviet Scientific and Technological Breakthrough?" ISTORIYA 13, no. 7 (117) (2022): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.18254/s207987840022366-1.

Full text

Abstract:

The Kosygin economic reform of 1965, named so as commemoration of the role of the head of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, came to the attention of researchers primarily from the perspective of economic effects on the development of the USSR. At the same time, the role of the Academy of Sciences, the issues of tactics and strategy of the development of the country’s scientific and technological potential mostly remained out of sight of the historical mainstream. The new evidences presented in the article demonstrate the level of academic science’s involvement in discussion of long-term development projects. As the authors show, it was during this period that the Academy of Sciences of the USSR was systematically involved in the development of economic strategies. The discussions of representatives of Gosplan, GKNT and the Academy of Sciences analyzed on the pages of the publication demonstrate the clash of “accounting” and “exploratory” approaches to science. The issues raised in 1960s are still relevant today — about spending on science and general effectiveness of investments in scientific research.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Guseletov, Boris P. "On the Role and Place of Perestroika in the Cycle of Russian — Soviet Reforms in XX Century: A Political Aspect." Koinon 3, no. 1 (2022): 80–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/koinon.2022.03.1.007.

Full text

Abstract:

The article analyzes the reforms of the political system of Russia, starting with the revolution of 1905 and ending with the reforms of Boris Yeltsin in the 90s of the twentieth century. The author shows t that the political model that had developed in tsarist Russia by the beginning of the last century did not meet the needs and realities of that time and did not allow the country to develop dynamically. The inconsistency of the reforms proposed by Nicholas II, against the background of Russia’s unsuccessful participation in the First World War, led the country in 1917, first to the February and then the October revolutions, which ended the monarchy, proclaimed a republic, first bourgeois, and then Soviet. But even these reforms did not allow us to abandon the authoritarian form of government that reigned in the Soviet Union for more than 70 years. The reform initiatives of the 60s by N. Khrushchev and A. Kosygin, aimed at softening the current political and economic regime, also had little success. The most decisive attempt to transform this regime towards its greater effectiveness and sustainability were the reforms of Mikhail Gorbachev, known as “perestroika”. They assumed a radical transformation of the existing political and economic slowness by giving it real competitiveness, more active involvement of citizens in public and business activity, rejection of the ideological and political monopolism of the Communist Party. But the initiators of perestroika failed to implement all these ideas in a short five-year period. Many of their ideas were embodied in the reforms of Boris Yeltsin, the results of which were enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 1993. But their practical implementation in the last decade of the twentieth century showed that so far Russia has not been able to completely abandon the ideas and principles of political monopolism, which do not allow the people to put into practice their socio-economic potential and ensure the country’s sustainable and progressive development.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Savelyev, Mikhail, Natalia Pushina, and Andrey Savchenko. "Assessment of the sustainability of economic development under the governments of Russia." E3S Web of Conferences 208 (2020): 03052. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020803052.

Full text

Abstract:

The article examines the features of the economic development of Russia since 1887 by growth and risk parameters. The development risk was measured using the standard deviation of the annual growth rates of real GDP. Progressive, regressive, conservative, and aggressive development is proposed to determine according to the changes in growth and risk. The authors have analyzed the process of development under individual governments, as well as in general for the imperial, socialist, and post-Soviet periods, with the emphasis in the last two Stalinist and post-Stalinist, liberal and patriotic periods, respectively. Progressive changes in economic development are revealed: Stolypin reforms, industrialization and the “vertical of power”; regressive: civil war, Khrushchev reforms, perestroika, liberalization, and modernization; conservative: Kosygin reforms and “nationalization of the elite”. Except for opportunistic growth and risk surges 1911-1913 and 1998-2000, no aggressive developmental periods with identifiable institutional causes were found. The repetitive development cycle of the socialist and post-Soviet periods is shown. The conclusion is made about the greater authenticity of the Russian culture of the socialist development model and the least of the liberal ones, as well as the need to develop post-industrial development institutions that are authentic to the Russian culture for their application after the predicted institutional crisis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Rasskazov, L. P., I. V. Uporov, and V. L. Rasskazov. "THE INSTITUTE OF SELF-FINANCING IN THE SOVIET STATE: THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION AND POLITICAL AND LEGAL REGULATION IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE «STAGNATION» PERIOD (THE TURN OF 1980)." Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science 7 (73), no. 3 (1) (2022): 60–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.37279/2413-1733-2021-7-3(1)-60-66.

Full text

Abstract:

The article reveals the theoretical aspects and political and legal features of the development of the institute of economic calculation in the Soviet economy at the final stage of the period of «stagnation» (the second half of the 1970s-the beginning of the 1980s). It is noted that «Kosygin reforms» were carried out in the USSR for a decade and a half to this milestone, where increased attention was paid to household calculation. However, within the framework of a planned socialist economy, this principle did not give the expected effect, and the country’s leadership did not dare to make drastic changes (the introduction of elements of market relations). As a result, the period of» stagnation «was replaced by a relatively short» perestroika», the collapse of the economy and the collapse of the USSR.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Arkhipova, Tatiana G. "A LONG-LIVED PRIME MINISTER OF RUSSIA. NEW COLLECTION OF MEMOIRS ABOUT A.N. KOSYGIN." RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Political Sciences. History. International Relations, no. 1 (2025): 194–203. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2025-1-194-203.

Full text

Abstract:

The review analyzes the composition and content of a collection of memoirs and articles published in 2024 and dedicated to A.N. Kosygin, the head of the Soviet government in 1964–1980. The collection contains memoirs of his colleagues, his associates, his daughter L.A. Gvishiani-Kosygina and other authors. All the materials are distributed among groups: testimonies; impressions; East and West; dispute about Kosygin. The idea of the compilers – writer and historian A.I. Kolpakidi and writer and publicist A.A. Zamostyanov – was not only to recall the outstanding statesman once again (as similar publications and studies about him been published by now), but also to prove the groundlessness of a number of critical remarks referred to him, mainly because of the economic reform of 1965 in the USSR. Along with the analysis of the reform itself, the authors managed to make more understandable the personality of Kosygin, who occupied key government positions for 40 years, commanding respect in colleagues and ordinary citizens, and possessing unique diplomatic abilities. The collection will be very useful for professional historians and a wide range of readers, who highly estimate the history of their Fatherland.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Safronov, A. V., and N. Y. Pivovarov. "Alexei Kosygin — The Minister of Finance: The struggle for hard budget constraints in the post-war Soviet economy." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 4 (April 2, 2025): 136–53. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-4-136-153.

Full text

Abstract:

The article is devoted to the activities of A. N. Kosygin as a Minister of Finance of the USSR during the period of 10 months in 1948. The study analyzes the tasks in the field of post-war finance restructuring faced by the Ministry of Finance in the fourth five-year plan period, the main areas of criticism of this ministry, which led to the dismissal of the previous Finance Minister A. G. Zverev, Kosygin’s activities to correct deficiencies in the work of the Ministry of Finance: improving the working conditions of financiers and their level of training, preparing wholesale price reform and the abolition of subsidies to industry, strengthening control over targeted spending, tax mobilization. The article focuses on the reasons for the increase in agricultural tax rates, as well as organizational measures within the central office of the Ministry of Finance aimed at eliminating deficiencies as soon as possible. Measures on activating the control, auditing and tax functions of the Ministry of Finance are seen as tightening budget constraints to overcome dependency attitudes among the leadership of economic ministries and departments. The “shake-up” of the USSR Ministry of Finance, in which Kosygin served as a kind of external manager, shows that in a Soviet-type economy budget constraints can be made quite tight, but this requires the same harsh pressure on the financiers themselves.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Donghyuk, Kim. "Alexei Kosygin and His Colleagues – The Formation of Human Factors in the “Kosygin” Reform." Journal of Slavic Studies 36, no. 4 (2021): 55–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.46694/jss.2021.12.36.4.55.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Karpenko, I. A. "About Kosygin's economic reform." Актуальные вопросы экономики, управления и права: сборник научных трудов (ежегодник), no. 1 (2021): 64–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.54449/37941_2021_1_64.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Sobolev, E. "Kosygin's Reforms: Unlearnt Lesson of History." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8 (August 20, 2009): 149–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-8-149-154.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Lukyanchenko, S., and Ya. Marchenko. "AGRICULTURAL COMPLEX OF THE WESTERN REGIONS OF THE UKRAINIAN SSR ON THE EVE OF THE «KOSHYGINA REFORMS»." Norwegian Journal of development of the International Science, no. 103 (February 24, 2023): 15–18. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7687809.

Full text

Abstract:

<strong>Abstract</strong> The article analyzes the main trends in the development of the agro-industrial complex of the Western Ukrainian region on the eve of Tue. call «Kosyginsky reforms». It was noted that in the late 1950s and early 1960s, the region's industry lost its growth rate, and agriculture suffered from a slowdown in the development of collective farm and state farm production, administrative and command management methods, and tolerance of heavy industry. <strong>Анотація</strong> У статті проаналізовано основні тенденції розвитку агропромислового комплексу західноукраїнського регіону напередодні вт. зв. «Косигінських реформ». Відзначено, що наприкінці 1950-х – на початку 1960-х рр. промисловість регіону втрачала темпи приросту, а сільське господарство потерпало від уповільнення темпів розвитку колгоспно-радгоспного виробництва, адміністративно-командних методів управління, толерування важкої індустрії.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Egorychev, N. G. "He went his own way: economic management reform by A.N. Kosygin." Актуальные вопросы экономики, управления и права: сборник научных трудов (ежегодник), no. 1 (2021): 42–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.54449/37941_2021_1_42.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

KIRSANOV, Roman. "Kosygin-Lieberman Reform: How to Combine Plan with Profit and Bonus." Perspectives and prospects. E-journal, no. 2 (2023): 84–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.32726/2411-3417-2023-2-84-101.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Лисовицкий, Владимир. "Евсей Либерман - идеолог «косыгинской» хозяйственной реформы". Историко-экономические исследования 17, № 3 (2016): 433–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2016.17(3).433-452.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Лазарева, Любовь. "Экономическая дискуссия 1962-1964 годов: выработка идеологии «косыгинской» реформы". Историко-экономические исследования 17, № 3 (2016): 453–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2016.17(3).453-466.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Lapteva, Elena. "Soviet Economic Model and Kosygin Reform 1965 in the Evaluation of Western Sovietology." Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета 1, no. 1 (2015): 37–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/10499.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Латов, Юрий, та Рустем Нуреев. "«Косыгинские» реформы в контексте советских политико-экономических циклов". Историко-экономические исследования 17, № 3 (2016): 488–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2016.17(3).488-504.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Voeikov, M. I. "THE ROLE OF THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS OF THE USSR ACADEMY OF SCIENCES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ECONOMIC REFORM OF 1965." Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук, no. 2 (2024): 158–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_2_158_171.

Full text

Abstract:

The article shows the role and place of the Institute of Economics of the USSR Academy of Sciences in the course of developing theoretical problems of the Kosygin reform of 1965 followed by the discussion with the soviet economists. A number of studies reveal that the Institute of Economics was in fact the scientific headquarters of this reform. Since the late 1950s leading scientists of the Institute expressed thoughts and positions that subsequently formed the basis for the ongoing economic reform. The essence of these ideas came down to the need to develop market relations in the Soviet economy of that time and to strengthen the effectiveness of the law of value. The article also shows that in the early 1970s. the Institute of Economics was subjected to severe criticism by party authorities, which resulted in a serious reorganization of the institution.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Yakutin, Yu V. "Academician Sitaryan. Create the future for today." Management and Business Administration, no. 2 (June 2020): 159–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.33983/2075-1826-2020-2-159-188.

Full text

Abstract:

On the occasion of the 300th anniversary of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Free Economic Society — VEO of Russia, is preparing a series of articles devoted to members of the academy who actively collaborated with VEO. Academician Sitaryan S.A. entered the economic history of Russia both as a prominent theoretical scientist, and as a talented organizer of economic reform processes, and as an active participant in the life of VEO. The article analyzes the scientific views of Academician S. Sitaryan on the problems of reforming the Soviet economy, starting with the «kosygin reform» and up to the reform of the late 80s of the twentieth century. The role of academician S. Sitaryan is revealed. in approving value categories in the practice of managing the national economy. The contribution of S. Sitaryan to the theory of analysis of macro- and microeconomic processes is shown; organization and assessment of the effectiveness of foreign economic relations; building rational and optimal budgetary relations between the center and the regions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Шапиро, Наталья. "Assessing Kosygin's reform from the standpoint of macroeconomic management." Историко-экономические исследования 16, no. 3 (2015): 454–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2015.16(3).454-468.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Kozlova, S. V., and S. A. Bratchenko. "REFORMING STATE PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION MECHANISMS IN THE CONTEXT OF NEW CHALLENGES: HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE OF KOSYGIN REFORM." Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук, no. 2 (2022): 53–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2022_2_53_75.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Латов, Юрий. "Kosygin's reform - a missed opportunity of the Soviet society «Dengxiaopingisation»?" Историко-экономические исследования 16, no. 3 (2015): 424–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2015.16(3).424-439.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Сорокин, Дмитрий. "The factor of trust (to the 50th anniversary of Kosygin's reform)." Историко-экономические исследования 16, no. 3 (2015): 415–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2015.16(3).415-423.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Chotiner, Barbara Ann. "Dismantling an Innovation: The November 1964 Decision Reunifying Industrial and Agricultural Organs of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union." Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies, no. 501 (January 1, 1985): 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/cbp.1985.22.

Full text

Abstract:

Two years after the November 1962 decision to divide the Communist party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) into separate industrial and agricultural organs, the new Brezhnev-Kosygin leadership reunited the party. The reorganization was and remains the most fundamental reform of the Soviet political system since the Great Purges. Restructuring the CPSU "on the production principle" had divided party committees below the union-republican level into industrial and agricultural organizations. Raikoms and some gorkoms were abolished; territorial production kolkhozsovkhoz administration (TPA) party committees and zonal-industrial party committees were established. The CPSU Central Committee (CC) and its unionrepublican counterparts acquired specialized bureaus to oversee production in the different economic spheres. 1 As a result of the 1962 reorganization, party involvement in the economy became more frequent and more occupied with details of production. Moreover, partkoms' economic interventions became oriented primarily toward development and guidance through the restructuring of productive relationships, introducing new products and technology, and planning.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Лаптева, Елена. "Anglo-American sovietology on the Soviet economic model and Kosygin's reform in 1965." Историко-экономические исследования 16, no. 3 (2015): 481–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2015.16(3).481-493.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Chernyakov, S.F. "Socialism: Errors in Theory (Soviet Political Economy of the 1960s–1970s)." Problems in Political Economy, no. 1 (March 23, 2025): 151–66. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15072945.

Full text

Abstract:

The article is devoted to the contradictions of the official political economy of the era of “mature socialism”. The majority of leading political economists, reflecting the official point of view, rightly denied the coexistence of the market and socialism, which was called for by the “commodity economists”. At the same time, however, they considered the established commodity relations under "developed socialism" as formal, not posing a threat to the new system, but, on the contrary, "working" for it. This circumstance, as well as a certain conformism, is connected with the support of scientists for the deepening and expansion of relations within the framework of the "Kosygin" reform of 1965. Commodity in the Soviet economy was not regarded as a sign of incompleteness of socialist transformations; a factor of immaturity of socialism. Such a position was also connected with the Soviet political economists' lack of understanding of how planning could completely displace market elements; how to organize real alienation. Therefore, political economy thought in the USSR in the era of “developed socialism” cannot be considered adequate to the real tasks facing the country.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Ядгаров, Яков. "The features of reformist views in the Soviet period (to the 50th anniversary of Kosygin's reforms of 1965)." Историко-экономические исследования 16, no. 2 (2015): 329–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2015.16(2).329-345.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Krayneva, Irina, and Natalya Kupershtokh. "USSR ACADEMY OF SCIENCES IN COMPUTER CREATION PROJECTS: DEVELOPMENT IMPULSES IN 1948–1991." Ural Historical Journal 85, no. 4 (2024): 145–54. https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2024-4(85)-145-154.

Full text

Abstract:

The article is devoted to the study of projects for the development of digital computing technology and software at the USSR Academy of Sciences and the Siberian Branch during the Soviet period (1948–1991). It is emphasized that their implementation was due to a number of geopolitical, technological and scientific factors. The main directions of state scientific and technical policy in the field of digital computing according to three technological impulses are revealed. The development of computers in the USSR received the first external technological impetus from the Soviet atomic project, where the volume of calculations exceeded human capabilities. The next technological impulse was associated with the Kosygin reform of the mid-1960s. The increasing complexity of the structure of the USSR national economy required appropriate technical equipment for computer- based management structures. The third technological impulse arose within the USSR Academy of Sciences in the 1980s, when efforts were concentrated on creating fifth-generation computers as a response to the “Japanese challenge”. The article describes the activity of the USSR Academy of Sciences as an initiator of the use of computers in scientific research and economy of the Soviet Union. It considers the content of projects in the field of computer technology and programming, implemented at the Novosibirsk Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Conclusions are drawn on the need for further study of the problem in the light of the challenges facing society in the modern period.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Artemov, E. T. "Eastern Regions in the Economic Strategy on the “Take-off” Stage of the Soviet Industrial System." Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology 23, no. 8 (2024): 81–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-8-81-93.

Full text

Abstract:

The article delves into the strategy and implementation of economic development in the eastern regions of Russia from the pre-war five-year plans to the “Kosygin reform”. It highlights the substantial growth in the importance of these regions in the national economy during this period. However, historical perspectives on the long-term consequences of the “Eastern shift” in the production and population proportions vary. Some researchers believe that such a course met and meets the fundamental interests of the country. Others dispute this, attributing it to excessive geopolitical ambitions and a distorted understanding of the economy’s actual needs. Based on the historiographic analysis and documentary sources, the author offers an interpretation of why the authorities prioritized the advanced economic development of the eastern territories and how they executed this strategy. It is concluded that implementation of such a course has led to a radical change in the territorial structure of production. At the same time, as the period under review drew to a close, the focus shifted from advanced development to sustaining the achieved level, resulting in a deceleration of economic growth in the eastern regions. This was primarily ascribed to the decreasing efficacy of the “socialist economic system” and the ruling elite's persistent aversion to reforming economic institutions. One overarching argument posited in the article is that there was a substantive “shift of productive forces” towards the East in the broader context of the Soviet era, coinciding with the period of the “take-off” of the Soviet industrial system. The foregoing allows us substantiating the relationship between high rates of economic growth and “intensive economic development” of the eastern regions of the country.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Feygin, Yakov. "Choosing Stagnation. The Kosygin Reforms and the Rise of Brezhnev’s Stagnationary Coalition." Europe-Asia Studies, October 9, 2023, 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2023.2257005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Шабельник, Н. В., and Г. Д. Разуваев. "REFORM OF A.N. KOSYGIN: AN ALTERNATIVE WAY OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOVIET ECONOMY." История науки и техники, no. 1 (January 17, 2023). http://dx.doi.org/10.25791/intstg.1.2023.1398.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Viktorov, A. "The relationship between the economic and the political aspects within the socio-political interaction in the Soviet Union, 1965-1985." June 4, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.802695.

Full text

Abstract:

In the article the analysis of the influence of economic and political factors of society development and the variability of their influence on the formation of positive socio-political climate in the Soviet Union, 1965-1985. The main focus is on economic performance, with subsequent evaluation of the role of major historical personalities (L. I. Brezhnev, A. N. Kosygin, M. A. Suslov) on the formation aspects have a direct or indirect influence on social and political interaction. Investigates the legitimacy of the use of the thesis and interconnection of economic and political aspects in the formation of socio-political interactions on the example of the most important major economic and political events, such as the economic reform of 1965. In this study used several scientific and honest scientific methods such as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparative and descriptive methods of research characteristic of modern historical science. The novelty of this study is a comprehensive consideration of the economic and political aspects through the prism of influence on the formation of positive public and political climate in the region. The practical importance of this article is the possibility of subsequent use of this study for the preparation of a complex of works on Russian history and the history of Astrakhan Region.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!