Academic literature on the topic 'Kymlicka'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Kymlicka.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Kymlicka"

1

O'Neill, Daniel I. "Multicultural Liberals and the Rushdie Affair: A Critique of Kymlicka, Taylor, and Walzer." Review of Politics 61, no. 2 (1999): 219–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500051986.

Full text
Abstract:
This article critically analyzes the work of Will Kymlicka, Charles Taylor, and Michael Walzer, three of the most important contemporary political philosophers writing on issues of multiculturalism. It uses the Rushdie affair, and each theorist's interpretation of it, as the basis for an immanent critique of “multicultural liberalism,” a theory defined by the dual commitment to cultural rights for minority groups and certain core liberal principles, defended in different ways by Kymlicka, Taylor, and Walzer. It is principally concerned with Kymlicka, whose work is one of the most influential attempts to respond to communitarian criticisms that “atomistic” liberalism is inhospitable to community and culture. The article argues that Kymlicka's defense of “multicultural citizenship” is deeply problematic from the perspective of the Rushdie affair. It then considers Taylor and Walzer similarly, as representatives of the communitarian strain of multicultural liberal argument, and likewise finds their positions unconvincing. The article concludes with the suggestion that the Rushdie affair points to a potentially unresolvable tension at the heart of all three attempts to defend multicultural liberalism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lunney, Daniel. "Can a critical reading of Zoopolis by Donaldson and Kymlicka lead to advocating dialogue between animal rights theorists and zoologists?" Pacific Conservation Biology 25, no. 1 (2019): 72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pc17052.

Full text
Abstract:
This essay is a zoologist’s response to Zoopolis. A political theory of animal rights by Donaldson and Kymlicka (2011). What drew me to look at their new approach was that geography played a part in conceptualising animal communities and, in particular, the specific focus on wild animals and urban wildlife. To oversimplify, Donaldson and Kymlicka say, much of the debate operates within one of three basic moral frameworks: a welfarist, an ecological and a basic rights approach, but none has proved capable of fundamental change. That change will only be possible, they consider, if we can develop a new moral framework that connects the treatment of animals more directly to the fundamental principles of liberal–democratic justice and human rights. A major point of agreement between zoologists and Donaldson’s and Kymlicka’s views is that animals deserve more than being over-ridden at every encounter with human interests. A major stalling point in advocating a dialogue between animal rights theorists and zoologists is where Donaldson and Kymlicka accept the animal rights position at the outset, rather than letting their thesis play out to see what their position might be for each geographic zone and for each species. Also, it is clear that Donaldson’s and Kymlicka’s starting point is the traditional animal rights agenda, which rules out animal research as morally illegitimate. The conservation of Australia’s fauna could not survive in that regime. Consequently, I cannot advocate dialogue between animal rights theorists and zoologists from a critical reading of Zoopolis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Heim, Darian. "“Old” Natives and “New” Immigrants: Beyond Territory and History in Kymlicka's Account of Group-Rights." Migration Letters 13, no. 2 (March 16, 2016): 214–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.33182/ml.v13i2.303.

Full text
Abstract:
According to Will Kymlicka, only historically and territorially bound “national” groups can engage in a “nation-building” process. Recently arrived immigrant groups cannot as they have neither been able nor willing to do so. The paper argues, first, that such empirical facts are insufficient for the normative conclusions Kymlicka defends; and second, that if his ultimate goal is to achieve better “terms of integration” for immigrants, he cannot deny them the right to attempt their own “nation-building”. As an illustration, the paper describes Kymlicka's own thought-experiment of Chinese immigrants in Canada pursuing a nation-building-process analogous to the Québécois. It explores how criteria for advocating group rights other than history and territory – desert, participation, or need –avoid treating old and new minorities in an arbitrarily asymmetric manner.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dick, Caroline. "“Culture and the Courts” Revisited: Group-Rights Scholarship and the Evolution of s.35(1)." Canadian Journal of Political Science 42, no. 4 (December 2009): 957–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423909990655.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract.In revisiting Michael Murphy's critique of the cultural test adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada to interpret Aboriginal rights, this article takes up the suggestion that the works of Charles Taylor and Will Kymlicka support an inherent understanding of Aboriginal rights. An assessment of the jurisprudence suggests that the Court's approach reflects, rather than contradicts, Taylor's and Kymlicka's rights frameworks, which invoke the same discourse of culture and identity embraced by the Court. The article also contends that the role played by culture in Canada's Aboriginal rights jurisprudence extends well beyond the cultural rationale adopted by the Court.Résumé.En revisitant la critique de Michael Murphy sur l'examen culturel adopté par la Court Suprême du Canada dans l'interprétation des droits indigènes, cet article adopte la suggestion que les travaux de Charles Taylor et Kymlicka supportent une définition inhérente des droits indigènes. Une évaluation de la jurisprudence suggère que la position de la cour reflète, plutôt que contredit, l'approche des droits mise en avant par Taylor et Kymlicka. Celle-ci, en effet accepte le même discours culturel et identitaire que la court. L'article affirme également que le rôle joué par la culture dans la jurisprudence Canadienne sur les droits indigènes se prolonge bien au delà du raisonnement culturel adopté par la court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kozachuk, Oleh. "Liberal Pluralism and Multiculturalism in Central and Eastern Europe (W. Kymlicka Views’ Analysis)." Історико-політичні проблеми сучасного світу, no. 33-34 (August 25, 2017): 230–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2016.33-34.230-237.

Full text
Abstract:
Will Kymlicka is widely known in the world for the research in the field of the theoretical principles of liberal pluralism and justification of the policy of multiculturalism. In his scientific work, he pays attention not onlyto his native Canada but also draws attention to other regions of the world, including Central and Eastern Europe. The scientist asks whether the export of Western model of liberal pluralism and multiculturalism policies available in the region? Are Western models of multiculturalism and minority rights relevant for the post-Communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe? In the following article, we analyze Will Kymlicka’s views on this issue. Kymlicka explains why conventional ways of distinguishing between ethnic relations in the East and West do not help in understanding or responding to ethnic conflicts in the post-Communist world. He argues why the states of Central and Eastern Europe are not inherent in the territorial autonomy in their state building. He also argues why federalism as a form of government is not the solution of interethnic interaction’s problems. In addition, Will Kymlicka tries to highlight the unique characteristics of the region, which do not suggest the possibility of the introduction of liberal pluralism and multiculturalism in Central and Eastern Europe in the near future. Keywords: Liberal pluralism, multiculturalism, territorial autonomy, federalism, minorities
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Månsson, Niclas. "Will Kymlicka: Mångkulturellt medborgarskap." Utbildning & Demokrati – tidskrift för didaktik och utbildningspolitk 8, no. 3 (January 1, 1999): 151–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.48059/uod.v8i3.659.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kymlicka, Will. "Modernity and Minority Nationalism: Commentary on Thomas Franck." Ethics & International Affairs 11 (March 1997): 171–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.1997.tb00026.x.

Full text
Abstract:
Focusing on the nature of modern nationalism, Kymlicka asserts that Franck overstates the dichotomy of so-called romantic tribal nationalism and traditional nationalism as seen in the United States and France, which Franck claims is liberal, inclusive, and based on political principles rather than blood lines. Using examples from France, the United States, and Quebec, Kymlicka shows that language and common identity as well as liberal principles of freedom and democracy compose modern liberal nationalism. More sympathetic to minority nationalism than Franck, Kymlicka argues that minority movements are not irrational but often based upon legitimate claims, claims that majorities frequently fail to take seriously. Kymlicka concludes in agreement with Franck that minority nationalists should have greater representation at the international level, not simply as a means of pacifying minority nationalists but in the interests of international justice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Peddle, David. "Freedom within the Ordnung: Liberal grounds for toleration of Amish culture." Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 29, no. 4 (December 2000): 453–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000842980002900405.

Full text
Abstract:
It is remarkable that Will Kymlicka, whose works Liberalism, Community and Culture and Multicultural Citizenship have mounted, on liberal grounds, a vigorous defense of the rights of minority cultures, nevertheless fails to extend principled toleration to Amish culture. The present argument is concerned to indicate that Amish culture is not as restrictive as suggested in Kymlicka's portrayal, to examine the conception of culture which leads him to this unfortunate exclusion and to indicate that the situation of the Amish provides an archetype of the appropriate relationship between liberal democracies and non-liberal minority cultures.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Tanchuk, Nick. "Justifying Bill 18: A Critique of Kymlicka’s Comprehensive Neutrality." Sexual and Gender Diversity in Schools 22, no. 1 (September 14, 2020): 91–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1071469ar.

Full text
Abstract:
Manitoba’s Bill 18 provides students the legal right to form gay-straight alliance student groups within denominational and dissentient schools. Religious opponents of Bill 18 claim that the law unjustifiably imposes a homogenous moral worldview on religious families. I argue that if we appeal to Will Kymlicka’s comprehensive neutralist theory of political morality to justify Bill 18, the religious complaint is problematically vindicated. I argue that Kymlicka appeals to two bases of neutrality that ultimately fail to distinguish his view from the perfectionist theories of political morality that he officially rejects. Due to this internal inconsistency, the priority of Kymlicka’s preferred moral practices remains unjustified. For those of us who believe that Bill 18 is morally justified, an alternative approach to explaining this intuition is required.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Craig, Elizabeth. "The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the Development of a 'Generic' Approach to the Protection of Minority Rights in Europe?" International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 17, no. 2 (2010): 307–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181110x495917.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis article considers some of the debates that have taken place in recent years about the Framework Convention's potential application to 'new minorities' or 'immigrant' groups. It explores the relevance of the work of Will Kymlicka to these debates as well as the stance adopted by the Framework Convention's Advisory Committee and State responses. The article argues that the protection of 'new' minorities under the Framework Convention should continue to be encouraged by the Advisory Committee and that this is an approach supported not only by Kymlicka's work but also on a more pragmatic level by State experiences to date.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Kymlicka"

1

Stecher, Guzmán Antonio. "Los Retos del multiculturalismo. Reflexiones sobre el pensamiento de Will Kymlicka." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2004. http://www.repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/108798.

Full text
Abstract:
Tesis para optar al grado de Magister en Filosofía mención en Axiología y Filosofía Política.
El objetivo de esta Tesis es presentar y discutir la teoría liberal de los derechos de las minorías elaborada por el filósofo político canadiense Will Kymlicka. Dicha teoría propone un modelo de ciudadanía multicultural que establece un conjunto de „derechos diferenciados en función de grupo‟ para los miembros de las minorías culturales.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Heise, David. "Autonomy or toleration? Rawls and Kymlicka on the liberal response to pluralism /." Available to subscribers only, 2006. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1240700401&sid=2&Fmt=2&clientId=1509&RQT=309&VName=PQD.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Pigeon, Louis-Etienne. "Multiculturalisme et politique. Une analyse critique de la théorie de Will Kymlicka." Thesis, Université Laval, 2007. http://www.theses.ulaval.ca/2007/25042/25042.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Pigeon, Louis-Étienne. "Multiculturalisme et politique : une analyse critique de la théorie de Will Kymlicka." Master's thesis, Université Laval, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/19571.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Haist, Allana. "Securing Diversity." Doctoral thesis, Universitätsbibliothek Chemnitz, 2013. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-qucosa-130148.

Full text
Abstract:
Will Kymlicka’s seminal work on Multicultural Citizenship has done much to advance the case for minority rights worldwide. Agreeing with communitarians that culture is important, yet unwilling to relinquish liberal equality and fairness, Kymlicka builds on John Rawls’s monumental Theory of Justice to show group rights are not only accord with liberalism, but are its true fulfilment. Yet, while Kymlicka’s theory has received accolades for elegantly tying liberalism and culturalism together theoretically, it has been met with equal scepticism over the tenability of its praxis. In this book, I argue that much of the criticism wielded against Kymlicka’s theory results from his crucial reliance on the definition of societal cultures and the contradictions embedded therein. This is further compounded by the tendency of Kymlicka to neglect his commitment to dynamic culture and liberalism in favour of a monolithic treatment of culture, leading us down the path to illiberal conclusions. I suggest that for Kymlicka’s theory of “Multicultural Citizenship” to embrace a truly vibrant multiculturalism, the theory must overcome its internal contradictions and reaffirm its commitment to a multi-layered and recursive approach to group rights. I shall review the strengths and weaknesses of Kymlicka’s theory set against contemporary debates on the topics of nationalism and minority rights and will suggest how the theory can reduce its inner tensions to embolden its critical support for multiculturalism in Canada and worldwide.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ducasse, Pierre Lucas. "La neutralité de l'État face à la structure culturelle dans le révisionnisme libéral de Will Kymlicka." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/tape15/PQDD_0004/MQ33625.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Camati, Odair. "Multiculturalismo e o problema da universalidade: uma análise das teorias de Charles Taylor e Will Kymlicka." Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, 2018. http://www.repositorio.jesuita.org.br/handle/UNISINOS/7056.

Full text
Abstract:
Submitted by JOSIANE SANTOS DE OLIVEIRA (josianeso) on 2018-05-11T15:32:26Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Odair Camati_.pdf: 1067364 bytes, checksum: 5f0ed114a31bc5d5fcfe07a390e1b15c (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-11T15:32:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Odair Camati_.pdf: 1067364 bytes, checksum: 5f0ed114a31bc5d5fcfe07a390e1b15c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-21
CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Neste trabalho sustentamos a tese de que o encontro entre as teorias de Charles Taylor e Will Kymlicka oferece boas perspectivas para o estabelecimento de um projeto multicultural em sociedades liberais e democráticas, mas possui limites quando da tentativa de universalização desse mesmo projeto. As dificuldades quanto à universalização se apresentam de formas distintas nos autores referidos. Para o liberal Kymlicka, os valores tradicionais do liberalismo são suficientes para o reconhecimento de todas as diferentes manifestações culturais. Com isso a universalidade estaria pré-concebida, o que, segundo nosso entendimento, impediria um diálogo construtivo com aqueles que não comungam os mesmos valores. Taylor, por sua vez, propõe um modelo de razão prática com raízes hermenêuticas que ofereceria elementos para o estabelecimento de juízos de valor com validade para todas as comunidades humanas que se colocassem em processo de compreensão mútua. As limitações residem na dificuldade para estabelecer condições mínimas para que esse processo se desenvolva sem distorções. Para chegar a esse momento, faremos antes uma retomada dos principais elementos envoltos nas discussões multiculturais no sentido de provar a necessidade de debater tal temática. Na sequência, apresentaremos criticamente os fundamentos conceituais desenvolvidos pelos filósofos canadenses em suas teorias do multiculturalismo. Basicamente, a autonomia é o conceito central em Kymlicka e o reconhecimento ocupa o mesmo espaço em Taylor. Por fim, a partir de um liberalismo brando, da não possibilidade de total neutralidade estatal e da valorização do contexto de escolha, propomos que existem elementos suficientes para desenvolver um projeto multicultural em sociedades liberais e democráticas. O que não significa, necessariamente, que temos elementos para um projeto multicultural com validade universal
In this work, I support the thesis that even though the encounter between Charles Taylor’s and Will Kymlicka’s theories offers good prospects for the establishment of a multicultural project in liberal and democratic societies, it has some limits when we try to universalize it. The difficulties regarding universalization are presented in different ways by the aforementioned authors. On the one hand, Kymlicka’s liberalism holds that the traditional values of liberalism are sufficient for the recognition of all different cultural manifestations. On this view, the universality would be preconceived, which, according to our understanding, would preclude a constructive dialogue with those who do not share the same values. On the other hand, Taylor proposes a model of practical reason with hermeneutical roots that would provide elements for the establishment of value judgments valid for all human communities that put themselves in a process of mutual understanding. The limitations of this model lie in the difficulty of establishing minimum conditions for this process to be developed without distortions. To get this point, we shall first take up the main elements involved in multicultural discussions in order to prove the need to discuss such issues. After that, we shall critically expose the conceptual foundations developed by both Canadian philosophers in their theories of multiculturalism. Basically, while autonomy is Kymlicka’s core concept, recognition is Taylor’s one. Finally, from a soft liberalism, which claims the lack of state neutrality and the valorization of the context of choice, we propose that the encounter between the two theories has enough elements to develop a multicultural project in societies that are both liberal and democratic. Yet this does not necessarily mean that we have elements for a multicultural project with universal validity.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Soto, Carvajal Rossanna. "DEMOCRACIA Y RECONOCIMIENTO: Reflexiones sobre multiculturalidad en la democracia chilena desde los postulados de Taylor y Kymlicka." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2008. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/109726.

Full text
Abstract:
Adscribiendo a la necesidad de reflexionar sobre multiculturalidad en la democracia chilena, es que se considera necesario guiar este pensamiento escrito y preguntarse por ¿Cuáles son los factores relevantes que intervienen en la falta de reconocimiento de los Pueblos Indígenas como sujetos de derechos colectivos en nuestro país y qué tipo de inclusión proponen la democracia liberal inspirada en la economía de mercado? Considerando para la anterior cuestión, que la más alta motivación para los movimientos y reivindicaciones indígenas es el reconocimiento, que se sitúa históricamente en “dos grandes dimensiones: una socio-económica producto de la exclusión y el empobrecimiento de estos pueblo y una étnica, donde se exige el respeto a la identidad, a su lengua y su cosmovisión, y que con la emergencia del movimiento indígena latinoamericano se incorpora una tercera que es el “reconocimiento como pueblo-nación” ; es que se instala en el escenario político la exigencia de derechos colectivos para estos grupos. El Estado chileno ha tenido enormes dificultades para desarrollar las acciones destinadas a la resolución de estos conflictos; creemos que estas dificultades no siempre han sido producto de las malas relaciones, ni tampoco de los desacuerdos entre los poderes del Estado, sino fundamentalmente por los intereses que el Estado antepone a la política indígena, esto es, la política económica y la mantención los consensos, acorde con las estrategias de desarrollo que ha elegido y que se alejan de los principios éticos que debieran fundamentar la democracia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Khan, Mohammad O. "Secular Foundations of Liberal Multiculturalism." Digital Archive @ GSU, 2011. http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/100.

Full text
Abstract:
In pursuit of a just political order, Will Kymlicka has defended a liberal conception of multiculturalism. The persuasive appeal of his argument, like that of secular-liberalism more generally, is due to presenting liberalism as a neutral and universal political project. Utilizing Charles Taylor’s genealogy of ‘exclusive humanism’ in A Secular Age, this thesis attempts to re-read Kymlicka in order to make certain theological commitments in his work explicit. Here I argue that Kymlicka, in order to make his conception of multiculturalism plausible, relies on a theologically-thick and controversial humanism operating under secular conditions of belief. By committing himself to a particular conception of the human and specific conditions of belief, Kymlicka’s liberal multiculturalism is rendered provincially incoherent because it fails to treat in a neutral manner certain theological commitments.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Silva, Larissa Tenfen. "Limites e possibilidades de ressignificação da categoria cidadania a partir do multiculturalismo de Wil Kymlicka, Charles Taylor e Jurgen Habermas." Florianópolis, SC, 2005. http://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/103022.

Full text
Abstract:
Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Jurídicas. Programa de Pos-Graduação em Direito.
Made available in DSpace on 2013-07-16T02:41:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
A presente pesquisa tem por fim verificar de que forma os modelos multiculturais propostos por Kymlicka, Taylor e Habermas vêm ressignificar o conceito tradicional liberal de cidadania para que este possa estar apto à resolução dos conflitos provenientes da diversidade cultural existentes nos Estados democráticos nacionais. Neste sentido, procura-se estudar a categoria cidadania, bem como examinar as principais demandas e desafios impostos à mesma pelo multiculturalismo, para, por fim, analisar três propostas de cidadania multicultural. Dessa forma, no primeiro capítulo, busca-se examinar os fundamentos pré-modernos e modernos que influenciam na caracterização de uma cidadania de caráter nacional, homogêneo e excludente, que se revestiu sob a forma de cidadania liberal nacional. No segundo capítulo, procura-se estabelecer uma contextualização sobre o multiculturalismo, apontando os principais fatos históricos e atuais que o constituem enquanto um fato social, bem como as principais características, demandas e desafios que o cercam enquanto visto como uma teoria normativa, ressaltando, nesta direção, sua relação com as questões da diversidade cultural e das políticas de reconhecimento. Por fim, no terceiro capítulo, parte-se para a análise de três propostas alternativas à concepção tradicional liberal de cidadania, tais como expostas por Will Kymlicka, Charles Taylor e Jurgen Habermas, para então se pensar a questão da ressignificação da cidadania. Nesse sentido, percebe-se que estas propostas não rompem com o marco liberal, mas apenas o ampliam. Entretanto, apesar desta constatação, verifica-se que as propostas designadas acima trazem vários desafios à concepção tradicional de cidadania, pugnando por uma ampliação de seu conceito, visando à inclusão das demandas provenientes da diversidade cultural, o que ocorre prioritariamente em termos político-normativo.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Kymlicka"

1

Médard, Robin. La République face aux droits des minorités: Lire l'ordre juridique français à partir de la théorie libérale de Will Kymlicka. Paris: Harmattan, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Šarčević, Abdulah. Kritika moderne: Socijalna filozofija : filozofija znanosti : teorija racionalnosti-- otvoreno društvo : Hans Lenk, Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, Jürgen Habermas, Paul Feyerabend, Richard Rorty, Peter Sloterdijk, Kostas Axelos, Gianni Vattimo, Will Kymlicka. Sarajevo: "Svjetlost", 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Reviews, Cram101 Textbook. Outlines & Highlights for Multicultural Citizenship by Kymlicka, ISBN: 0198290918. AIPI, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ian, Shapiro, Kymlicka Will, American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy. Meeting, and Association of American Law Schools., eds. Ethnicity and group rights / edited by Ian Shapiro and Will Kymlicka. New York: New York University Press, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kukathas, Chandran. Moral Universalism and Cultural Difference. Edited by John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig, and Anne Phillips. Oxford University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548439.003.0032.

Full text
Abstract:
This article examines the relationship between moral universalism and cultural difference. It analyses the problem of how to measure the claims of particular cultures against the demands of universal morality and discusses possible ways to resolve the tension between cultural minorities and the intrusion of the morality of Western liberalism. One prominent solution to this problem attempts to resolve it by identifying special rights to be accorded to cultural groups to enable them to hold on to their particular customs and traditions. The best-known and most influential theory here is that developed by Will Kymlicka, who put the case for the protection of cultural minorities in terms that were consistent with the universalist commitments of a liberal political outlook.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Garner, Robert. The Contemporary Debate in Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199375967.003.0019.

Full text
Abstract:
This final chapter explores the range of ideas current in the contemporary animal ethics debate. Much of the chapter is devoted to documenting the critique of the animal welfare ethic, which holds that, while animals have moral standing, humans, being persons, have a superior moral status. Three different strands of this critique—based on utilitarian, rights, and contractarian approaches—are identified and explored. The final part of the chapter documents the fragmentation of the animal ethics debate in recent years. This has included a more nuanced position which seeks to decouple animal rights from abolitionism, accounts of animal ethics from virtue ethics and capabilities perspectives, and a relational turn associated with the feminist care ethic tradition and, more recently, the utilization of citizenship theory by Donaldson and Kymlicka.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cochrane, Alasdair. Sovereignty for Animals? Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789802.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 5 considers whether, within the proposed sentientist global political order, some groups of wild animals ought to be granted their own political communities. Indeed, Donaldson and Kymlicka have claimed that wild animals ought to be recognized as having sovereignty over their territories. This chapter evaluates this claim and concludes that the best way of protecting the basic rights of wild animals is not through granting them sovereignty, but through recognizing them as equal members of mixed human–animal communities. It then addresses a potential problem with regarding wild animals as equal members of our political communities: that it leads to our having positive duties of assistance to wild animals, requiring us to ‘police nature’. The chapter argues that while we do in fact have positive duties of assistance to wild animals, these do not require or permit immediate massive interventions by humans into nature.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Kymlicka"

1

Keulartz, Jozef. "Should the Lion Eat Straw Like the Ox? Animal Ethics and the Predation Problem." In The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, 99–121. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63523-7_6.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractStephen Clark’s article The Rights of Wild Things from 1979 was the starting point for the consideration in the animal ethics literature of the so-called ‘predation problem’. Clark examines the response of David George Ritchie to Henry Stephens Salt, the first writer who has argued explicitly in favor of animal rights. Ritchie attempts to demonstrate—via reductio ad absurdum—that animals cannot have rights, because granting them rights would oblige us to protect prey animals against predators that wrongly violate their rights. This article navigates the reader through the debate sparked off by Clarke’s article, with as final destination what I consider to be the best way to deal with the predation problem. I will successively discuss arguments against the predation reductio from Singer’s utilitarian approach, Regan’s deontological approach, Nussbaum’s capability approach, and Donaldson and Kymlicka’s political theory of animal rights.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Kymlicka." In Contemporary Political Theorists in Context, 141–53. Routledge, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203003138-17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rosas, João Cardoso. "Kymlicka, Will." In The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, 407–8. Cambridge University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139026741.109.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Melidoro, Domenico. "Liberalism and Minority Rights." In Dealing with Diversity, 19–40. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190121136.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter illustrates CA liberalism through the exposition of Will Kymlicka’s theory. Kymlicka works out a systematic liberal theory sensitive to cultural belonging and minority rights. The liberalism he defends is overtly comprehensive and pro-autonomy, and alleges to be adequate in addressing the cultural diversity represented by national and ethnic minorities (or migrants). In spite of caution in his use of the notion of autonomy, it is the sole reliance on this value that make Kymlicka’s liberalism seriously objectionable. In fact, Kymlicka explicitly aims at liberalizing the minorities. This liberalization transforms minorities into something they reject as extraneous to their conception of the good life. Thus, the liberalization of minorities put their diversity at risk, and entails disrespect for their conception of the good. This means that our search for a theory that is able to accommodate diversity should go beyond CA liberalism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"WILL KYMLICKA AS PEACEMAKER." In Positive Peace, 39–47. Brill | Rodopi, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789042029927_006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Tomasi, John. "Kymlicka, Liberalism, and Respect for Cultural Minorities*." In Indigenous Rights, 123–46. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315252391-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Opalski, Magda. "Can Will Kymlicka Be Exported to Russia?" In Can Liberal Pluralism be Exported?, 298–316. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019924815x.003.0016.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Singer, Beth J. "Multiculturalism, Identity, and Minority Rights: Will Kymlicka and the Concept of Special Rights." In Pragmatism, Rights, and Democracy, 92–107. Fordham University Press, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823218677.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter focuses on the arguments of the Canadian philosopher Will Kymlicka for “special rights” designed to protect indigenous minorities and their cultures. Kymlicka rests his argument for the rights of cultural minorities on the fact that membership in a cultural community is “an important good for the individual.” He finds this good to be, in the first place, a function of the relation between membership in cultural communities and personal identity. However, he seems to be thinking of identity more as a matter of “identifying with” than as consisting in the traits by which a person can be identified and recognized. This identity would include, in addition to such traits as that person's appearance and voice, the characteristic ways in which she or he deals with the world and with other people. Identity in this sense can include having a sense of belonging to a cultural community.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"The new debate over minority rights: Will Kymlicka." In Democracy and National Pluralism, 21–45. Routledge, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203166857-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"Putting Kymlicka in Perspective: Canadian Diversity and Collective Rights." In Accommodating Cultural Diversity, 69–86. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315565477-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography