Academic literature on the topic 'L-FIL-LET/09 Filologia e linguistica romanza'

La tesi idaga la presenza di riferimenti biblici all'interno dei testi di due fra i più antichi, e importanti, poeti occitani: Guglielmo IX e Jaufre Rudel. Alcuni testi del primo – Ben vueill que sapchon li pluzor, Companho, tant ai agutz d’avols conres e Companho, farai un vers … covinen – hanno rivelato una tale densità di allusioni bibliche, utilizzate per lo più in chiave polemica e dissacrante, da richiedere analisi minuziose e approfondite. Nel caso di Jaufre Rudel la presenza di espressioni e temi biblici, o più generalmente religiosi, era già stata messa in luce da diversi interpreti; ma un più accurato esame del suo breve e compatto canzoniere ha portato a scoprire altri riferimenti, a correggerne alcuni già proposti, a proporre alla luce di queste indagini nuove interpretazioni di passi oscuri o controversi. I capitoli dedicati a questi due trovatori sono preceduti da un’introduzione nella quale è discusso un problema di grande rilevanza metodologica: quello che riguarda i testi, i canali e le mediazioni attraverso i quali era conosciuta la Bibbia nel medioevo, in particolare nel Sud della Francia.

Viene presentata la trascrizione e l'analisi, con commento linguistico e glossario, del "Cattapan", un codice manoscritto utilizzato dalla Confraternita dell'Ospedale di San Tommaso dei Battuti di Portogruaro dal 1391 al 1459.

Questo lavoro intende analizzare il Testamento di Zuan Polo e gli strambotti del XVI sec. scritti nel linguaggio schiavonesco a Venezia. Si offrirà un'analisi linguistica per capire i fenomeni più caratteristici dello schiavonesco, e un'edizione commentata dei testi presi in questione. Si offrirà, inoltre, una panoramica sull'arte buffonesca dell'epoca e uno studio introduttivo per capire il contesto storico veneziano.

For a long time, the work of a Franciscan Friar who had lived in Bologna and in Florence during the 13th and 14th centuries, Bartolomeo Della Pugliola, was thought to have been lost. Recent paleographic research, however, has affirmed that most of Della Pugliola’s work, although mixed into other authors, is contained in two manuscripts (1994 and 3843), currently kept at University Library in Bologna. Pugliola’s chronicle is central to Bolognese medieval literature, not only because it was the privileged source for the important work of Ramponis’ chronicle, but also because Bartolomeo della Pugliola’s sources are several significant works such as Jacopo Bianchetti’s lost writings and Pietro and Floriano Villolas’ chronicle (1163-1372). Ongoing historical studies and recent discoveries enabled me to reconstruct the historical chronology of Pugliola’s work as well as the Bolognese language between the 13th and 14th century The original purpose of my research was to add a linguistic commentary to the edition of the text in order to fill the gaps in medieval Bolognese language studies. In addition to being a reliable source, Pugliola’s chronicle was widely disseminated and became a sort of vulgate. The tradition of chronicle, through collation, allows the study of the language from a diachronic point of view. I therefore described all the linguistics phenomena related to phonetics, morphology and syntax in Pugliola’s text and I compared these results with variants in Villola’s and Ramponis’ chronicles. I also did likewise with another chronicle by a 16th century merchant, Friano Ubaldini, that I edited. This supplement helped to complete the Bolognese language outline from the 13th to the 16th century. In order to analize the data that I collected, I tried to approach them from a sociolinguistic point of view because each author represents a different variant of the language: closer to a scripta and the Florentine the language used by Pugliola, closer to the dialect spoken in Bologna the language used by Ubaldini. Differencies in handwriting especially show the models the authors try to reproduce or imitate. The glossary I added at the end of this study can help to understand these nuances with a number of examples.

For a long time, the work of a Franciscan Friar who had lived in Bologna and in Florence during the 13th and 14th centuries, Bartolomeo Della Pugliola, was thought to have been lost. Recent paleographic research, however, has affirmed that most of Della Pugliola’s work, although mixed into other authors, is contained in two manuscripts (1994 and 3843), currently kept at University Library in Bologna. Pugliola’s chronicle is central to Bolognese medieval literature, not only because it was the privileged source for the important work of Ramponis’ chronicle, but also because Bartolomeo della Pugliola’s sources are several significant works such as Jacopo Bianchetti’s lost writings and Pietro and Floriano Villolas’ chronicle (1163-1372). Ongoing historical studies and recent discoveries enabled me to reconstruct the historical chronology of Pugliola’s work as well as the Bolognese language between the 13th and 14th century The original purpose of my research was to add a linguistic commentary to the edition of the text in order to fill the gaps in medieval Bolognese language studies. In addition to being a reliable source, Pugliola’s chronicle was widely disseminated and became a sort of vulgate. The tradition of chronicle, through collation, allows the study of the language from a diachronic point of view. I therefore described all the linguistics phenomena related to phonetics, morphology and syntax in Pugliola’s text and I compared these results with variants in Villola’s and Ramponis’ chronicles. I also did likewise with another chronicle by a 16th century merchant, Friano Ubaldini, that I edited. This supplement helped to complete the Bolognese language outline from the 13th to the 16th century. In order to analize the data that I collected, I tried to approach them from a sociolinguistic point of view because each author represents a different variant of the language: closer to a scripta and the Florentine the language used by Pugliola, closer to the dialect spoken in Bologna the language used by Ubaldini. Differencies in handwriting especially show the models the authors try to reproduce or imitate. The glossary I added at the end of this study can help to understand these nuances with a number of examples.