Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.

Journal articles on the topic 'Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 3 June 2025

Last updated: 31 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Bogani, Giorgio, Fabio Ghezzi, Luis Chiva, et al. "Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis." International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 30, no. 7 (2020): 987–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001381.

Full text

Abstract:

ObjectiveRecent evidence has suggested that laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is associated with an increased risk of recurrence in comparison with open abdominal radical hysterectomy. The aim of our study was to identify patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.MethodsThis a retrospective multi-institutional study evaluating patients with recurrent cervical cancer after laparoscopic and open abdominal surgery performed between January 1990 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥18 years old, radical hysterectomy (type B or

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Lampé, Rudolf, and Róbert Póka. "A laparoszkópos és nyitott radikális hysterectomia összehasonlítása a méhnyakrák műtéti ellátásában." Orvosi Hetilap 158, no. 36 (2017): 1403–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/650.2017.30828.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract: Introduction: Cervical cancer is one of the most common causes of death among women with malignant tumours. The two most common ways of surgical technique of early stage cervical cancer is the laparoscopy and the laparotomy. Aim: Our aim was to compare the intra- and postoperative results of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy. Method: Ten nerve sparing laparoscopic and 11 abdominal radical hysterectomies were performed from June 2016 until June 2017 because of early stage cervical cancer. Results were analysed retrospectively. Results: There wa

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Saito, Tsuyoshi, Motoki Matsuura, Masato Tamate, Masahiro Iwasaki, and Tasuku Mariya. "Radical Vaginal Trachelectomy." Surgery Journal 07, S 02 (2021): S103—S107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739120.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractRecently, radical vaginal hysterectomy (RVH) has developed into laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH), which is associated with the laparoscopical procedure, and it is applied as radical vaginal trachelectomy and semi-radical vaginal hysterectomy. LARVH is indicated for patients with stage IB1 and IIA1 cervical carcinoma, especially those with a tumor size of less than 2 cm, because the cardinal ligaments cannot be resected widely. Although RVH that is associated with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy is the most used surgical procedure, radical trachelectomy

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Lee, Jung-Yun, Jae-Weon Kim, Kidong Kim, Myong Cheol Lim, and Jin Hee Kim. "Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer." Journal of Clinical Oncology 35, no. 15_suppl (2017): e17015-e17015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e17015.

Full text

Abstract:

e17015 Background: Despite the benefits of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer, population-level data describing the surgery’s effectiveness in unselected patients are lacking. We compared morbidity, cost, and survival between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Methods: We used the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database to identify women with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy from 2011 to 2014. Patient who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy were compared with those who had minimally

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Liu, X., and H. Jiang. "Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 21, no. 6 (2014): S220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.722.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Querleu, Denis. "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 168, no. 5 (1993): 1643–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90818-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Zhu, J., H. Xia, and X. Liu. "Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 22, no. 6 (2015): S143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.498.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Moufawad, Graziella, Antonio Simone Laganà, Nassir Habib, et al. "Learning Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Are We Facing an Emerging Situation?" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3 (2023): 2053. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032053.

Full text

Abstract:

Despite wide screening campaigns and early detection, cervical cancer remains the fourth most common cancer among women. Radical hysterectomy, whether by open, laparoscopic or by robotic-assisted techniques, is the mainstay treatment. However, for adequate surgical results and good oncological prognosis, a gynecological surgeon should be trained to perform those procedures. The learning curve of radical hysterectomy, especially by laparoscopy, is influenced by several factors. The LACC trial, the decrease in cervical cancer incidence and radical hysterectomy procedures have widely reduced the

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Firmeza, Mariana Alves, Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos, José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto, Luiz Gustavo de Oliveira Brito, Flávio Mendes Alves, and Natália Maria de Vasconcelos Oliveira. "The Effects of Hysterectomy on Urinary and Sexual Functions of Women with Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review." Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics 44, no. 08 (2022): 790–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748972.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Objective This systematic review aims at describing the prevalence of urinary and sexual symptoms among women who underwent a hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Methods A systematic search in six electronic databases was performed, in September 2019, by two researchers. The text search was limited to the investigation of prevalence or occurrence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual dysfunctions in women who underwent a hysterectomy for cervical cancer. For search strategies, specific combinations of terms were used. Results A total of 8 studies, published between 2010 and

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Pareja Franco, L. R., G. J. Rendón, L. M. Echeverri, F. E. Echeverri, and P. T. Ramirez. "Outpatient laparoscopic radical hysterectomy." Gynecologic Oncology 133 (June 2014): 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.511.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Echeverri, L. M., G. J. Rendón, R. Pareja, F. E. Echeverri, M. A. Madariaga, and P. T. Ramirez. "Outpatient laparoscopic radical hysterectomy." Gynecologic Oncology 137 (April 2015): 140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.349.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Kadar, N. "Laparoscopic-vaginal radical hysterectomy." Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1, no. 4 (1994): S14—S15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80915-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Lee, C. L. "173: Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 14, no. 6 (2007): S64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.08.138.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Koehler, C., E. Gottschalk, V. Chiantera, S. Marnitz, K. Hasenbein, and A. Schneider. "From laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy to vaginal assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy." BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 119, no. 2 (2011): 254–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03202.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

King, Erin R., and Pedro T. Ramirez. "Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer." Oncology & Hematology Review (US) 05, no. 01 (2009): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.17925/ohr.2009.05.1.90.

Full text

Abstract:

Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) for early-stage cervical cancer is a safe and feasible procedure. The advantages over abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) include shorter operating times, less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, and a shorter hospital stay. Robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) offers an alternate minimally invasive approach to performing radical hysterectomy. Robotic surgery provides improved depth perception, a greater range of motion of surgical instruments, decreased tremor, and improved ergonomics compared with laparoscopic surgery.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Corrado, Giacomo, Enrico Vizza, Francesco Legge, et al. "Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Multi-institution Study and a Review of the Literature." International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 28, no. 5 (2018): 1020–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/igc.0000000000001254.

Full text

Abstract:

ObjectiveThe aim of this retrospective study was to assess the surgical and oncological outcome of 3 different surgical approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotic surgery) in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1.MethodsAll patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of early-stage cervical cancer, FIGO stage IB1, who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, or robotic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy were included in the stu

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Yoo, Ji Geun, Yoon Kyung Elena Lee, and Keun Ho Lee. "Surgical outcomes of single port lapraroscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer." Journal of Clinical Oncology 35, no. 15_suppl (2017): e17003-e17003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e17003.

Full text

Abstract:

e17003 Background: We aim to see the postoperative outcomes of single port laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Methods: Twenty five cervical cancer patients (FIGO stage 9 IA, 13 IB, and 3 IIA) were treated by single port laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in single center. Results: Six patients were performed by type A hysterectomy, 6 by type B, and 13 by type C radical hysterectomy. Median operation time was 91, 197, and 275 minutes, respectively. Median number of pelvic nodes retrieved was 20. There was no postoperative complication except a colon serosa injury in type C rad

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Hu, Ting wen yi, Yue Huang, Na Li, Dan Nie, and Zhengyu Li. "Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China." International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 30, no. 8 (2020): 1143–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001340.

Full text

Abstract:

IntroductionRecently, the safety of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cervical cancer has been questioned. This study was designed to compare the disease-free survival and overall survival of abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsA total of 1065 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who had undergone abdominal/laparoscopic radical hysterectomy between January 2013 and December 2016 in seven hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. The 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in all patients.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Brodowski, Lars, Matthias Jentschke, Hermann Hertel, Peter Hillemanns, and Fabian Kohls. "Abdominal and Laparoscopic Cervical Carcinoma Therapy – a Comparative Economic Assessment." Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 81, no. 10 (2021): 1154–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1500-8056.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Objective The LACC (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer) study revealed advantages in terms of overall survival and relapse risk favouring abdominal radical hysterectomy over the laparoscopic procedure. The present paper will compare the two surgical techniques from the economic point of view based on a process cost calculation. Material/Methods A retrospective cost analysis of all radical hysterectomies from the year 2018 was done at the Hanover University Medical School based on the bottoms-up method and guided by the clinical treatment pathway. Result Of 51 primary cases treat

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Lucidi, Alessandro, Swetlana Windemut, Marco Petrillo, et al. "Self-Reported Long-Term Autonomic Function After Laparoscopic Total Mesometrial Resection for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicentric Study." International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 27, no. 7 (2017): 1501–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/igc.0000000000001045.

Full text

Abstract:

ObjectivesThis multicentric retrospective study investigates the early and long-term self-reported urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunctions in early-stage cervical cancer patients who submitted to laparoscopic total mesometrial resection (L-TMMR), total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, and laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy.MethodsCervical cancer patients, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IA2–IB1/IIA1 who submitted to nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy were recruited. Pelvic functions were as

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Raspagliesi, Francesco, Giorgio Bogani, Fabio Martinelli, et al. "3D Vision Improves Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Treated with Laparoscopic Type B Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy." Tumori Journal 103, no. 1 (2016): 76–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/tj.5000572.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose To evaluate the alterations on surgical outcomes after of the implementation of 3D laparoscopic technology for the surgical treatment of early-stage cervical carcinoma. Methods Data of patients undergoing type B radical hysterectomy (with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) and pelvic lymphadenectomy via 3D laparoscopy were compared with a historical cohort of patients undergoing type B radical hysterectomy via conventional laparoscopy. Complications (within 60 days) were graded per the Accordion severity system. Results Data of 75 patients were studied: 15 (20%) and 60 (80%) p

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Geisler, John P., Curtis J. Orr, Naumann Khurshid, Garth Phibbs, and Kelly J. Manahan. "Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Compared With Open Radical Hysterectomy." International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 20, no. 3 (2010): 438–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/igc.0b013e3181cf5c2c.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

CANIS, MICHEL, GERARD MAGE, ARNAUD WATTIEZ, JEAN LUC POULY, CHARLES CHAPRON, and MAURICE ANTOINE BRUHAT. "Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy." Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 8, no. 2 (1992): 103–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/gyn.1992.8.103.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Xue, X., and P. Gong. "Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy and Lymphadenectomy." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 22, no. 6 (2015): S121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.349.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Ramirez, P. T., K. M. Schmeler, and M. R. Milam. "446: Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 14, no. 6 (2007): S150—S151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.08.656.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Mehta, J. "Radical Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic Shearer." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 25, no. 7 (2018): S255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.719.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Capalbo, Giuseppe, Violante Di Donato, Andrea Giannini, and Giorgio Bogani. "Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy." American Journal of Clinical Oncology 46, no. 2 (2023): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/coc.0000000000000973.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Fusegi, Atsushi, and Hiroyuki Kanao. "Total Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy Using the No-look No-touch Technique." Surgery Journal 07, S 02 (2021): S77—S83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736178.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractRadical hysterectomy is a standard operation for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Over the recent decades, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has been considered an alternative treatment. In 2018, the results of the laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer trial suggested that women with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy had poorer prognosis than those who underwent open surgery. This finding was unexpected, and direct evidence supporting poor prognosis related to minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was not availa

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Chen, Xu, Na Zhao, Piaopiao Ye, et al. "Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm." International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 30, no. 5 (2020): 564–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000994.

Full text

Abstract:

ObjectiveThere is recent evidence that demonstrates worse oncologic outcomes associated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy when compared with open radical hysterectomy, particularly in patients with tumors >2 cm. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) 2009 stage IB1 (FIGO 2009) cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.MethodsA retrospective review of medical records was performed to identify patients who underwent either lap

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Subedi, Nilam, Asmita Ghimire, Asmita Shrestha, Samriddha Raj Pant, and Padam Raj Pant. "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A safe and effective surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer." Grande Medical Journal 3, no. 1 (2021): 68–71. https://doi.org/10.3126/gmj.v3i1.79125.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Laparoscopic techniques to treat early stage cervical cancer have been recently begun by gynecologic oncologist. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was performed to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. Data was obtained from the medical record department and analyzed. Result: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was done in nine patients in a period of last 1.5 yrs. The mean age was 50.2 years

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Chong, Gun Oh. "Robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic literature review." Gynecologic Robotic Surgery 2, no. 2 (2021): 33–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.36637/grs.2021.00038.

Full text

Abstract:

Robotic technology has recently come into widespread use to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Most comparative studies showed that blood loss and hospital stays for patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery, including robotic procedures, were superior compared to open surgery. Moreover, the survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy were not inferior to open radical hysterectomy. Unexpectedly, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, a randomized, open-label, noninferiority study that com

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Dubuc-Lissoir, J., S. Laframboise, J.-S. Brunet, et al. "Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy: A Non-randomized Study." Journal SOGC 21, no. 10 (1999): 943–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0849-5831(16)30028-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Chang, Y. Y. C., T. L. Hwang, and W. C. Lin. "Follow-Up of Clinical Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy and Laparoscopy Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 20, no. 6 (2013): S143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.489.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Dogan, Nasuh Utku, Christhardt Kohler, Tatiana Pfiffer, Andrea Plaikner, Xin Le, and Giovanni Favero. "Prospective assessment of urinary and bowel symptoms, and sexual function between laparoscopic assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy." International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 31, no. 3 (2021): 484–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001757.

Full text

Abstract:

ObjectiveRadical trachelectomy is a valid alternative to radical hysterectomy in women with a desire to retain their fertility. Data regarding the oncological outcomes of radical trachelectomy are comparable with those of radical hysterectomy but information regarding urinary and sexual function is limited. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate and compare quality of life, urinary and bowel symptoms, and sexual dysfunction between patients who underwent laparoscopic assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsPatients

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Anagnostopoulos, A., S. Mitra, B. Decruze, R. Macdonald, and J. Kirwan. "Safety and Cost Considerations during the Introduction Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy." Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2017 (2017): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2103763.

Full text

Abstract:

Objective. To compare the safety, efficacy, and direct cost during the introduction of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy within an enhanced recovery pathway. Methods. A 1 : 1 single centre retrospective case control study of 36 propensity matched pairs of patients receiving open or laparoscopic surgery for early cervical cancer. Results. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the two cohorts. Open surgery cohort had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (189 versus 934 mL) and longer postoperative hospital stay (2.3 versus 4.1 days). Although no signi

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Rodriguez, Juliana, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, James Saenz, et al. "Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis." International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 31, no. 4 (2021): 504–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-002086.

Full text

Abstract:

IntroductionRecent evidence has shown adverse oncological outcomes when minimally invasive surgery is used in early-stage cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to compare disease-free survival in patients that had undergone radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, either by laparoscopy or laparotomy.MethodsWe performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients with cervical cancer stage IA1 with lymph-vascular invasion, IA2, and IB1 (FIGO 2009 classification), between January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2017, at seven cancer centers from six countries. We included sq

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Lyngdoh, B. T. "Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy – Safe Tunnel Dissection." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 20, no. 6 (2013): S14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.044.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Kriplani, A., B. T. Lyngdoh, P. K. Garg, R. Mahey, and B. B. Dash. "Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Carcinoma Cervix." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 17, no. 6 (2010): S22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.08.155.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Canis, M., C. Pomel, J. Dauplat, et al. "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer." Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 5, no. 3 (1998): S5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80252-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Sedlacek, TV, MJ Campion, RA Hutchins, and H. Reich. "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A preliminary report." Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1, no. 4 (1994): S32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80974-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Ting, HC. "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A preliminary experience." Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1, no. 4 (1994): S36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80985-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Iniesta, M. D., J. de Santiago, and J. Ordas. "Splenic rupture following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy." International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 99, no. 3 (2007): 245–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.030.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Puntambekar, S. P., P. Mahajan, and G. N. Wagh. "442: Laparoscopic Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 14, no. 6 (2007): S150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.08.652.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Puntambekar, S. P., A. M. Patil, M. A. Kulkarni, and S. S. Puntambekar. "Laparoscopic Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy (LNSRH)." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 15, no. 6 (2008): 31S—32S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2008.09.116.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Kohler, Christhardt, Anna Jacob, Viola Schneider, Achim Schneider, and Andrea Plaikner. "Transvaginal phase of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy." International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 30, no. 4 (2020): 553–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-001139.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Patel, K., B. Thigpen, L. Chohan, and J. B. Nijjar. "Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Following Robotic Radical Trachelectomy." Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 29, no. 11 (2022): S66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.09.215.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Yu, Juanpeng, Ting Yu, Shengsheng Yu, and Yingchun Gao. "Short-term efficacy of laparoscopic type C radical hysterectomy by deep uterine vein approach for treatment of cervical cancer." African Journal of Reproductive Health 28, no. 12 (2024): 73–81. https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2024/v28i12.8.

Full text

Abstract:

This was an original research. The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic type C radical hysterectomy by deep uterine vein approach in treating cervical cancer. Two hundred cases of cervical cancer were allocated into control group and intervention group. The control group underwent pelvic lymph node dissection + para-aortic lymph node resection followed by extensive hysterectomy. The intervention group underwent laparoscopic type C radical hysterectomy by deep uterine vein approach + pelvic lymph node dissection ± para-aortic lymph node resection. In comparison

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Choi, Chel Hun, Jeong-Won Lee, Yoo-Young Lee, et al. "Comparison of Laparoscopic-Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer." Annals of Surgical Oncology 19, no. 12 (2012): 3839–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2406-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Choi, C., J. Lee, Y. Lee, et al. "Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer." Gynecologic Oncology 130, no. 1 (2013): e48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.173.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Volpi, Eugenio, Annamaria Ferrero, Alice Peroglio Carus, Elena Jacomuzzi, and Piero Sismondi. "Laparoscopic dissection of the ureter for radical laparoscopic hysterectomy." Gynecological Surgery 2, no. 3 (2005): 179–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-005-0122-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!