Academic literature on the topic 'LCC'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'LCC.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "LCC"
Cañero, D. Cordoba, and M. I. G. Roncero. "Functional Analyses of Laccase Genes from Fusarium oxysporum." Phytopathology® 98, no. 5 (May 2008): 509–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/phyto-98-5-0509.
Full textKulkarni, Prof Avadhut. "Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Blocks." International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 9, no. VI (June 30, 2021): 3389–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.35712.
Full textYu, Bao Ying, Fen Lian Xu, and Yu Xin Gao. "Experimental Study on Particle Size Distribution of Admixtures on the Strength Influence of Low Clinker Cement." Advanced Materials Research 557-559 (July 2012): 1415–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.557-559.1415.
Full textSchneider-Marin, Patricia, Anne Winkelkotte, and Werner Lang. "Integrating Environmental and Economic Perspectives in Building Design." Sustainability 14, no. 8 (April 13, 2022): 4637. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14084637.
Full textGuo, Fengdi, Jeremy Gregory, and Randolph Kirchain. "Probabilistic Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavements Based on Simulation Optimization." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2673, no. 5 (April 4, 2019): 389–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0361198119838984.
Full textBulboacă, Adriana, Alina Porfire, Lucia Tefas, Paul Boarescu, Sorana Bolboacă, Ioana Stănescu, Angelo Bulboacă, and Gabriela Dogaru. "Liposomal Curcumin is Better than Curcumin to Alleviate Complications in Experimental Diabetic Mellitus." Molecules 24, no. 5 (February 27, 2019): 846. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050846.
Full textCarvalho, José Pedro, Fernanda Schmitd Villaschi, and Luís Bragança. "Assessing Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Impacts of Building Construction Solutions with BIM." Sustainability 13, no. 16 (August 9, 2021): 8914. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13168914.
Full textBaldoni, Edoardo, Silvia Coderoni, Elisa Di Giuseppe, Marco D’Orazio, Roberto Esposti, and Gianluca Maracchini. "A Software Tool for a Stochastic Life Cycle Assessment and Costing of Buildings’ Energy Efficiency Measures." Sustainability 13, no. 14 (July 16, 2021): 7975. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13147975.
Full textAbu, R., M. A. A. Aziz, and Z. Z. Noor. "Integrated Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Costing and Multi Criteria Decision Making for Food Waste Composting Management." Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies 21, no. 1 (January 22, 2021): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.37934/arbms.21.1.19.
Full textVan Gulck, Lisa, Stijn Van de Putte, Nathan Van Den Bossche, and Marijke Steeman. "Comparison of an LCA and LCC for façade renovation strategies designed for change." E3S Web of Conferences 172 (2020): 18005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017218005.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "LCC"
Georges, Steve, and Oskar Larsson. "Isoleringsmaterials påverkan på LCA och LCC i prefabricerade småhus." Thesis, Jönköping University, Tekniska Högskolan, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-50505.
Full textPurpose: The purpose was to analyze to which degree different insulation materials affected the, CO2-emissions, cost and thermal bridges in houses. This was due to the fact that we wanted to highlight the effects it brought in the long and short run for both the building companies but also for the environment. Method: The methods used was literature studies, document analysis and case study. Findings: The results from the empiricism showed that the insulations material had relatively large consequences for the total energy losses. This due to the thermal bridges and the U-values size change while the areas and the lengths of the thermal bridges remain constant. The differences become more distinct with larger areas on the houses (including the amount of building floors) and usually result in longer thermal bridges. The results of the empirical study showed that cellulose had the best LCC value while aerogel had the worst LCC value, aerogel was about 790% worse than cellulose. Aerogel had the best carbon dioxide emissions when emitted from electricity while mineral wool, cellular plastic, cellulose emitted about 10% more than aerogel. In insulating material production, aerogel releases most carbon dioxide and the cellulose absorb carbon dioxide. Implications: The insulation material does have a large impact on the energy transmission in houses. There is more than one reason to choose a better insulation material, mainly because of environmental and economic reasons. Less energy consumption is positive for the environment. Limitations: Due to the extent of the examination project this study was limited to houses stationed in Sweden. It resulted in the study being costumed to fit the requirements in Boverket national board of housing, building and planning. The calculations and the values of the thermal bridges are only calculated in theory. Keywords: Aerogel, cellulose, energy loss, insulation material, mineral wool, polyurethane, polystyrene, sustainable building, thermal bridges,
Fetahagic, Adi, and Henrik Pantzar. "LCA och LCC av olika isoleringsmaterial i en träbaserad väggkonstruktion." Thesis, Tekniska Högskolan, Högskolan i Jönköping, JTH, Byggnadsteknik, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-41116.
Full textPurpose: The aim of this thesis is to perform a comparison of different insulation materials in a wood-based wall structure through LCA and LCC analysis, and then tocreate a decision base for the selection of insulation material. Previous research oncarbon dioxide emissions for various building materials has been done. On the otherhand, it is not common for these to be studied together with economic aspects. The aimof the work is to perform an LCA and LCC comparison of mineral wool and other types of insulation material in a wood-based wall structure and through the result create decision basis in the selection of insulation material. This is investigated by three questions: (1) Which insulation material emits the lowest amount CO2-equivalents, considering that the thickness of the insulation material has the same u-value in a wall structure? (2) Which insulation material leads to lowest LCC, considering that the thickness of the insulation material gives the same u-value in a wall structure? (3) How can LCA and LCC results together create decision bases for choosing insulation materials? Method: In order to answer the above questions a literature study, case study with lifecycle analysis and life cycle cost analysis and document analysis is conducted. Findings: Four different insulation materials in a wood-based wall structure were studied concerning carbon dioxide emissions and life cycle costs. Material utilization and u-value were calculated for the wall structure. Functional unit for the analyses is 1 square meter of the wall structure with a u-value of 0.166 W/m2K and 0.107 W/m2K. The material that leads to the lowest carbon dioxide emissions for the wall structure is cellulose, wood fibre, mineral wool and lastly polyurethane. The material that leads tothe lowest cost of the wall structure is mineral wool, cellulose, wood fibre and lastly polyurethane. Implications: The work shows that the choice of insulation materials can reduce carbondioxide emissions during the production phase without incurring excessive costs. It alsoshows that the choice of insulation materials becomes even more relevant when energy efficient buildings are to be produced where the u-value of the wall structure is around 0.11 W/m2K, as this means larger insulation thicknesses in total for the wall. In orderto reduce CO2 emissions without significantly increasing costs, organic insulation materials should be chosen. Limitations: The work does not address climate impact from the house's energy or heating system. To get the same conditions for the selected insulation materials, thesame u-values in the wall structure must be achieved. The work concerns the entire lifecycle from cradle to grave in an LCA and LCC, however, emissions generated bytransport have been omitted in the analyses. Only the thermal and environmental properties of the insulation materials are treated. The case study considers a wood-based exterior wall of a multi-story building.
Almberg, Jan. "Användning av LCC : Vad krävs för att utforma en LCC-modell?" Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Ekonomihögskolan, ELNU, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-12719.
Full textAndersson, Lucas, and Tim Fjällström. "LCC och LCA-baserad jämförelse mellan batteridriven och bensindriven produkt." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för maskinteknik (MT), 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-96203.
Full textMany countries are trying to reduce the usage of fossil fuels and instead they are trying to find renewable alternatives. A common way to do this is to go from gasoline engines to electric engines. The purpose of the study is to gain a greater understanding of the products costs and environmental impact during their usage. The study was conducted as a case study at Swepac, Ljungby. The study’s implementation follows parts from LCC, LCA, CELA and the breakeven method in order to achieve the purpose. The environmental impact is measured in carbon dioxide equivalents and a conversion factor is used to convert the emissions to a monetary value that can be used in calculations of costs. The result shows that breakeven between the machines arises after 6.9 years, however, the service life is only 5 years. Both environmental impact, operating and maintenance costs is lower for the electrical option, however, the big difference in purchase price makes it take a long time for a breakeven to occur.
Lunnergård, Filip, and David Nilsson. "Integrering av LCA och LCC i en multikriterieanalys : Optimering av byggnadsdelar." Thesis, Tekniska Högskolan, Högskolan i Jönköping, JTH, Byggnadsteknik, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-41162.
Full textБерезін, Л. М. "Порівняльний LCC-аналіз технічних систем." Thesis, Київський національний університет технологій та дизайну, 2021. https://er.knutd.edu.ua/handle/123456789/19191.
Full textRydin, Sara, and Sofia Olsson. "En jämförelse av koldioxidutsläpp i en byggnads klimatskal beroende på val av isoleringsmaterial." Thesis, Tekniska Högskolan, Högskolan i Jönköping, JTH, Byggnadsteknik och belysningsvetenskap, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-45519.
Full textPurpose: A big part of the greenhouse gases from Sweden comes from the construction and real estate sector. Since the life cycle perspective is a high currant subject it is interesting to implement LCA to the building industry and perform such an analysis on the insulation materials that are traditionally used in the building industry. To make the result of the LCA applicable for companies in the industry it is also of interest to know how the LCC differs between the compared insulation materials. For the result to be easy to identify it is necessary to make a compilation of the cost in contrast to the carbon dioxide emissions. The goal of this study is to contribute with knowledge about the environmental impact from a life cycle perspective of different insulation materials. As well to see how the cost might change between different insulation materials with more or less carbon dioxide emissions, where a presumption is that the U-value is the same for the compared materials. Method: The scientific methods for the study have been literature study, case study and document analysis. As a complement, calculations, life cycle assessments and life cycle cost analysis have been made. Findings: Loose fill insulation of cellulose reduces the carbon dioxide emissions for insulation in the attic with 94,6 percent to a cost increase of 30 percent compared to stone wool. A board of cellulose reduces the carbon dioxide emissions for insulation in the external wall with 94,4 percent to a cost increase of 7 percent compared to stone wool. A foundation with foamglas reduces the carbon dioxide emissions with 65,1 percent to a cost increase of 55,2 percent compared to a foundation of EPS and concrete. Implications: • Insulation of cellulose have much lower carbon dioxide emissions than stone wool. • Life cycle cost for cellulose are a bit higher than for stone wool. • From this study the recommendation is to prioritize the environment above the cost and therefor use cellulose as insulation in buildings. • Foamglas is a more sustainable alternative to EPS and concrete for foundations. • Foamglas have a higher life cycle cost than EPS and concrete for foundations. • From this study the recommendation is to prioritize the environment above the cost and therefore consider to use foamglas for foundations. Limitations: The study has not included transportations of the materials. The life cycle assessments are made on 1 m2 of material with a fixed thickness. Only two insulation materials in each building part have been analyzed and no regards have been taken to the materials moist, sound, and fire attribute. The study is quantitative.
Mäkelä, Johan. "Miljö- och kostnadseffekter av att använda höghållfast stål i taket på Swedbank Arena." Thesis, KTH, Byggvetenskap, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-93799.
Full textThe thesis is a study of the fixed part of the roof structure in Swedbank Arena. The purpose of the study is to investigate how the choice of using high strength steel has influenced costs and environmental impact throughout the entire life cycle. The roof has been designed with three different alternatives in which the proportion of the high-strength has varied. The following text describes briefly which grades the alternatives are composed of. - Alternative A contains only conventional steel with a yield strength of 355 MPa. - Alternative B is the design that has been built. This structure contains steel with a yield strength between 355- 900 MPa. - Alternative C contains a larger proportion of high-strength steel than the existening construction. This alternative contains steel with a yield strength between 355-900 MPa. The calculations of the roof structure have been performed with the program Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2010 which has an automatic code check according to BSK07, a publication from the Swedish national Board of Housing, Building and Planning. Two different models, alternative A and C, have been created and compared with the real structure, alternative B. The results from this analysis have been used in the calculations of cost and environmental impact. In the calculations of environmental impact a life cycle analysis tool was used that has been developed especially for steel. The study compared the environmental impact of the alternatives with high strength steel with the alternative that only consists of conventional steel. It has been assumed that the environmental impact in the manufacturing of the profiles, assembly of the steel construction and the use phase is equal or negligible for the study. The environmental study is a comparison study. This means that parts of the constructions life cycle that result in an equal environment impact for all alternatives are not calculated in the study. The cost estimation was calculated in collaboration with Ruukki. The result of the analysis in Robot was used as a tender request that Ruukki used to calculate the total costs of all alternatives. In the cost calculations Ruukki took into account the differences in material prices, welding in the steel factory, painting, transportation and possible replacement of the crane during assembly. In the cost analysis it has been assumed that the cost of designing the roof structure and the use phase is the same for all alternatives. The cost analysis has been performed as a comparison study between the different alternatives. The result of the study shows that the steel volume decreased when the structure consists of high strength steel. The decrease of the steel volume resulted in a reduced total cost and environmental impact. By using high strength steel a lot of money has been saved and in the same time the environmental impact has decreased. The thesis is a study of the fixed part of the roof structure in Swedbank Arena. The purpose of the study is to investigate how the choice of using high strength steel has influenced costs and environmental impact throughout the entire life cycle. The roof has been designed with three different alternatives in which the proportion of the high-strength has varied. The following text describes briefly which grades the alternatives are composed of. - Alternative A contains only conventional steel with a yield strength of 355 MPa. - Alternative B is the design that has been built. This structure contains steel with a yield strength between 355- 900 MPa. - Alternative C contains a larger proportion of high-strength steel than the existening construction. This alternative contains steel with a yield strength between 355-900 MPa. The calculations of the roof structure have been performed with the program Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2010 which has an automatic code check according to BSK07, a publication from the Swedish national Board of Housing, Building and Planning. Two different models, alternative A and C, have been created and compared with the real structure, alternative B. The results from this analysis have been used in the calculations of cost and environmental impact. In the calculations of environmental impact a life cycle analysis tool was used that has been developed especially for steel. The study compared the environmental impact of the alternatives with high strength steel with the alternative that only consists of conventional steel. It has been assumed that the environmental impact in the manufacturing of the profiles, assembly of the steel construction and the use phase is equal or negligible for the study. The environmental study is a comparison study. This means that parts of the constructions life cycle that result in an equal environment impact for all alternatives are not calculated in the study. The cost estimation was calculated in collaboration with Ruukki. The result of the analysis in Robot was used as a tender request that Ruukki used to calculate the total costs of all alternatives. In the cost calculations Ruukki took into account the differences in material prices, welding in the steel factory, painting, transportation and possible replacement of the crane during assembly. In the cost analysis it has been assumed that the cost of designing the roof structure and the use phase is the same for all alternatives. The cost analysis has been performed as a comparison study between the different alternatives. The result of the study shows that the steel volume decreased when the structure consists of high strength steel. The decrease of the steel volume resulted in a reduced total cost and environmental impact. By using high strength steel a lot of money has been saved and in the same time the environmental impact has decreased.
Wiktor, Mårten, and Izabelle Johansson. "Using LCA and LCC in Planning Industrial Symbiosis : A study of the handling of sewage sludge in Malmö, Sweden." Thesis, Linköpings universitet, Industriell miljöteknik, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-148842.
Full textSchulte, Jesko Pitt Manoel. "Smarta steg på väg mot hållbara transporter? : Snabbladdningsinfrastruktur och elvägar ur ett strategiskt livscykelperspektiv." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för biologi och miljö (BOM), 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-46795.
Full textThe transport sector accounts for one fourth of Sweden’s total energy use and causes one third of the national emissions of greenhouse gases. At the same time, the Swedish government has set high goals: the vehicle fleet shall be fossil-independent until 2020 and Sweden shall not have any net emissions of greenhouse gases 2050. Quick and powerful actions are needed in order to reach these goals. Electrification has been pointed out as a key factor for success. In order for electric vehicles to be able to challenge and replace the fossil system, investment in new infrastructure is necessary. Fast chargers, where passenger cars can recharge their battery in short time, are already in place in many parts of Sweden. Electric roads is a term for new and innovative technologies where vehicles are charged from the road while they are driving. But which technique is the most strategic stepping stone on the way to sustainability? This study has its ground in the framework for strategic sustainable development which can be used to plan for sustainability in complex systems. At its core it uses backcasting from four basic sustainability principles. This work uses a combination of different methods to investigate the environmental impact and costs of fast charging infrastructure and electric roads from a strategic life cycle perspective. That information is then used to build models to take a closer look at how emissions to the environment change per invested Swedish crown, also dependent on how the used electricity is produced. The results show a large potential to decrease the environmental impact for both techniques, but it is strongly dependent on the electricity mix. Furthermore, this work shows that is is important to include the environmental impact of the infrastructure itself in life cycle analyses, because it can has a significant share in the total emissions. Finally, it is pointed out that it often not is the case that the emissions of carbon dioxide equivalents are the most important impact. It is therefore crucial to use a more holistic perspective in life cycle impact assessments. This work has identified a number of factors with large relevance but also large uncertainty. It is therefore recommended to fill the identified knowledge gaps and to expand the presented models with more factors and more alternative techniques, to get a more detailed picture of which solution is the best stepping stone on Sweden’s way to a sustainable future.
Greencharge Sydost
Books on the topic "LCC"
Harwood, Elain. Private architects and public housing and the LCC too! [U.K.]: Twentieth Century Society, 1996.
Find full textCochrane, Pauline A. Improving LCC and DDC for use in online catalogs and shelflists. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited Inc, 1989.
Find full textAtarashii kūkō keiei no kanōsei: LCC no motomeru kūkō to wa. Hyōgo-ken Nishinomiya-shi: Kansei Gakuin Daigaku Sangyō Kenkyūjo, 2012.
Find full textThompson, Paul. The forward march of modernisation: A history of the LCC, 1978-1998. [London?]: Labour Co-ordinating Committee, 1999.
Find full textA vision for London, 1889-1914: Labour, everyday life and the LCC experiment. London: Routledge, 1995.
Find full textThe Bolt Court connection: A history of the LCC School of Photoengraving and Lithography, 1893-1949. London: Privately printed by the London College of Printing, 1985.
Find full textRaphaël, Leivant Daniel Maurice, ed. Logic and computational complexity: International workshop, LCC '94, Indianapolis, IN, USA, October 13-16, 1994 : selected papers. Berlin: Springer, 1995.
Find full textThe AirAsia story 2: From two planes and RM40 million debt how AirAsia made flying possible for everyone and is now Asia's largest LCC group. Kuala Lumpur: Kanyin Publications, 2014.
Find full textMenucourt, Journée de. LCA-LCP, nouvelles approches thérapeutiques des ligamentoplasties du genou. Montpellier: Sauramps médical, 2003.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "LCC"
Imura, Takehiro. "Feature of P–S, P–P, LCL-LCL, and LCC-LCC." In Wireless Power Transfer, 175–88. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4580-1_6.
Full textTzanakakis, Konstantinos. "The LCC Concept." In Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic, 279–92. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36051-0_36.
Full textNakamura, Shinichiro, and Yasushi Kondo. "Waste Input-Output Analysis, LCA and LCC." In Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology, 561–72. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5737-3_27.
Full textRuegg, Rosalie T., and Harold E. Marshall. "Life-Cycle Cost (LCC)." In Building Economics: Theory and Practice, 16–33. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4688-4_2.
Full textRay, Navneet Kumar, Anamika Das, and Ananyo Bhattacharya. "Inductively Coupled WPT System Using LCC and LCL Compensation." In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 407–17. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6970-5_31.
Full textTzanakakis, Konstantinos. "Introduction to LCC and RAMS." In Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic, 253–56. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36051-0_33.
Full textAlwahaishi, Saleh, and Václav Snášel. "Assessing the LCC Websites Quality." In Networked Digital Technologies, 556–65. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14292-5_57.
Full textZhang, T. I., H. C. Jiang, and E. A. Kendall. "Agent Design for LCC Information Gathering." In Global Engineering, Manufacturing and Enterprise Networks, 313–21. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35412-5_37.
Full textTzanakakis, Konstantinos. "Maintenance Planning Using LCC KAI RAMS." In Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic, 293–96. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36051-0_37.
Full textTzanakakis, Konstantinos. "LCC and WLC (Whole Life Costing)." In Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic, 305–6. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36051-0_40.
Full textConference papers on the topic "LCC"
Lu, B., and P. Gu. "Systematic Life Cycle Design for Sustainable Product Development." In ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2003/dfm-48141.
Full textBadulescu, Adriana, and Munirathnam Srikanth. "LCC-SRN." In the 4th International Workshop. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1621474.1621519.
Full textMin, Congmin, Munirathnam Srikanth, and Abraham Fowler. "LCC-TE." In the 4th International Workshop. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1621474.1621520.
Full textNovischi, Adrian, Munirathnam Srikanth, and Andrew Bennett. "LCC-WSD." In the 4th International Workshop. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1621474.1621521.
Full textGiunta, Marinella, Sara Bressi, and Massimo Losa. "Sustainability in Railway Construction: LCA–LCC Based Assessment of Alternative Solutions for Track-Bed." In 2020 Joint Rail Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/jrc2020-8008.
Full textLi, Wanjing, Kai Ji, Zimin Shao, and Bangyin Liu. "Power Control Method for LCC-LCC Wireless Power Transmission Without Communication." In 2022 IEEE 5th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cieec54735.2022.9846335.
Full textGordt, Antonia, Stephanie Maier, Kristina Henzler, Stephanos Camarinopoulos, Vassilis Kallidromitis, Corrado Sanna, Panagiotis Panetsos, Theodora Karali, and Kostas Bouklas. "Proactive condition-based bridge rehabilitation planning including LCA and LCC." In Fifth International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure. University of Zagreb Faculty of Civil Engineering, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5592/co/cetra.2018.650.
Full textPalousis, N., L. Luong, and K. Abhary. "An integrated LCA/LCC framework for assessing product sustainability risk." In RISK ANALYSIS 2008. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/risk080131.
Full textJenson, J., Jose P. Therattil, and Joshna Anna Johnson. "A Novel LCC-LCL Compensation WPT System for Better Performance." In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icecct.2019.8869513.
Full textTupamäki, Olavi. "Total LCC and Probabilistics." In 25th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC), 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.22260/isarc2008/0074.
Full textReports on the topic "LCC"
Sheppard, J. Helical Undulator Radiation(LCC-0095). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/826491.
Full textSheppard, J. Planar Undulator Considerations(LCC-0085). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/826499.
Full textRaubenheimer, T. Proposed ILC Parameters(LCC-0003). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/826905.
Full textSheppard, J. Energy Deposition Using EGS4(LCC-0079). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/826504.
Full textSchultz, D. NLC Positron Target Heating(LCC-0065). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/826566.
Full textToge, N. International Study Group Progress Report (LCC-0042). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1454233.
Full textLarsen, R. Virtual Global Accelerator Network (VGAN)(LCC-0083). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/826501.
Full textStupakov, G. Interaction Region RF Shield Issues(LCC-0059). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/826618.
Full textSeryi, A. Monochromatization Option for NLC Collisions(LCC-0134). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/826823.
Full textFrisch, J. NLC Crab Cavity Phase Stability(LCC-0136). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/826824.
Full text