To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Lecturer Collaboration.

Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Lecturer Collaboration'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 18 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Lecturer Collaboration.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Mitchell-Kamalie, Lilian. "Successful information literacy through librarian-lecturer collaboration." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2011. http://etd.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=etd&action=viewtitle&id=gen8Srv25Nme4_1002_1352791157.

Full text
Abstract:
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:AllowPNG /> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves /> <w:TrackFormatting /> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF /> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-ZA</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark /> <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning /> <w:DontFlipMirrorIndents /> <w:OverrideTableStyleHps /> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math" /> <m:brkBin m:val="before" /> <m:brkBinSub m:val="&#45<br>-" /> <m:smallFrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispDef /> <m:lMargin m:val="0" /> <m:rMargin m:val="0" /> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup" /> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440" /> <m:intLim m:val="subSup" /> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr" /> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true" DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99" LatentStyleCount="267"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading" /> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"<br>mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0<br>mso-tstyle-colband-size:0<br>mso-style-noshow:yes<br>mso-style-priority:99<br>mso-style-parent:""<br>mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt<br>mso-para-margin-top:0cm<br>mso-para-margin-right:0cm<br>mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt<br>mso-para-margin-left:0cm<br>line-height:115%<br>mso-pagination:widow-orphan<br>font-size:11.0pt<br>font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"<br>mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri<br>mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin<br>mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri<br>mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin<br>mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"<br>mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi<br>mso-fareast-language:EN-US<br>} </style> <![endif]--></p> <p class="MsoNormal">This study supports the need for information literacy training for first year or new incoming Community and Health Science (CHS) students at the University of the Western Cape (UWC) and describes the use of a collaborative framework for integrating information literacy into the undergraduate studentsʹ curriculum and for assessing the results. The Collaborative Information Literacy Model (CILM) provided the guidelines for a more structured and fuller collaboration between the librarian and the lecturer responsible for the first year Physiotherapy students. The collaborative partnership employed strategies to teach information literacy competencies which were significantly more satisfactory with the studentsʹ abilities to successfully complete a research term paper. The process of integration began with developing learning outcomes, an information literacy program, exercises and an assessment instrument for evaluating student performance. Also emphasized is the on-going exchange of expertise between the librarian and the lecturer to enhance library-related components in the design of the program.</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Moinard, Pierre. "Partages des lectures entre pairs et apprentissages collaboratifs de la lecture littéraire sur des forums et des blogs." Thesis, Cergy-Pontoise, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018CERG0928/document.

Full text
Abstract:
La thèse interroge conjointement les effets de situations d’échanges sur des forums et des blogs sur la formation de jeunes lecteurs de textes littéraires et les conditions qui favorisent ou limitent ces effets. Cette problématique générale possède deux versants complémentaires :- un questionnement portant sur les compétences de lecture manifestées dans les pratiques sociales d’échanges entre lecteurs mais ordinairement ignorées par L’École ;- une interrogation sur l’entretien d’une réflexion sur les lectures et les textes par des enseignements associant le travail en ligne et en face-à-face.Pour répondre à ces questions, nous étudions un forum non scolaire d’adolescents lecteurs ainsi que différents dispositifs d’enseignement hybrides, conçus et mis en œuvre par 10 professeurs du secondaire exerçant en Île-de-France dans des établissements sociologiquement variés.La thèse poursuit trois objectifs solidaires, selon une approche ethnométhodologique attentive au contexte social et didactique propre à chaque cas étudié. Il s’agit de préciser les processus par lesquels le lecteur conduit une lecture imaginairement et émotionnellement impliquée, de distinguer les spécificités des différents usages de forums et de blogs de lecteur et de comprendre ce qui, dans ces situations, entretient ou inhibe le travail interprétatif.Nous proposons en premier lieu un modèle théorique d’intelligibilité des productions recueillies En deuxième lieu, nous analysons les échanges du forum des adolescents lecteurs pour en distinguer les spécificités et mieux comprendre la transposition scolaire des pratiques sociales. En troisième lieu, nous évaluons les effets des divers usages scolaires de forums et de blogs de lecteurs sur le travail interprétatif.Trois hypothèses ont été examinées. La première conjecture l’expression de compétences de lecture interprétative inconnues ou inaperçues en contexte scolaire sur le forum non scolaire d’adolescents lecteurs. La deuxième hypothèse attend l’entretien d’un travail de lecture impliquée et critique sur les espaces numériques. La troisième hypothèse prévoit des relances réflexives lors des retours en face-à-face sur des écrits asynchrones. Les atouts et les limites des situations étudiées conduisent à avancer des propositions pour l’enseignement et pour la formation des professeurs<br>The dissertation investigates both the effects of the idea and knowledge sharing forums and blogs, which foster the formation process of young readers’ literary competence, and the conditions which favor or limit these effects. This general problem has two complementary sides:- the existence of questioning about the reading skills manifested in social practices of the idea exchanging among readers but usually ignored to be implemented;- a question on skill maintenance through the reflection of the read texts by combining online work and face-to-face.To be able to form a sound opinion around these questions, we are examining a non-academic forum of teenagers as well as various hybrid teaching devices, designed and implemented by 10 high school teachers based in Île-de-France in socially varied institutions.The dissertation, taking into account the ethnomethodological approach that carefully examines the social and didactic contexts specific to each studied case, pursues three interdependent objectives. It is a question of specifying the processes by which the reader conducts an imaginarily and emotionally involved reading to distinguish the specifications of the different uses of the forums and reader blogs and to find out what maintains or inhibits the interpretative work under certain circumstances.We first propose a theoretical model of intelligibility of the output collected. Secondly, we analyze teenage readers’ idea exchanging forum to distinguish the specifications of this field and thus contributes to a better understanding of the transposition of social practices at school. Thirdly, we evaluate the effects of various school uses of forums and reader blogs on interpretive work.Three hypotheses were examined in the dissertation. On the non-academic forum of adolescent readers, we conjectured the expression of interpretative reading skills unknown or unnoticed in school context. Concerning hybrid teaching practices, on one hand we have been waiting for the maintenance of the involved and critical reading work in the digital spaces and on the other hand, in face-to-face feedbacks and on asynchronous writings. The strengths and limitations of the studied situations lead to recomendations for the implementation of hybrid approach and hereby for the training of teachers
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Colina, Zulimar. "DIAALE : Conception, implémentation et évaluation d’un dispositif en ligne d’aide à l’apprentissage de la lecture scientifique en anglais langue étrangère." Thesis, Université Clermont Auvergne‎ (2017-2020), 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017CLFAL021/document.

Full text
Abstract:
La thèse se propose de documenter les domaines du développement de la compréhension écrite en L2 chez des publics de non-spécialistes et de l’intégration des technologies de l’information et de la communication pour l’enseignement en contexte vénézuélien. Pour ce faire, la recherche s’appuie sur la conception, la mise en œuvre et l’analyse de deux dispositifs d’apprentissage de l’anglais comme langue étrangère, distanciels, intégrant des outils collaboratifs dans le contexte de la faculté d’ingénierie de l’université de Carabobo au Vénézuéla. Ces deux dispositifs permettent le recueil de données de recherche et de données écologiques, qui sont structurées en corpus puis traitées. A partir de ces données hétérogènes, sont étudiés particulièrement les processus de collaboration entre élèves-ingénieurs dans des tâches de lecture en anglais L2, le développement des compétences en compréhension écrite et l’utilisation des dispositifs électroniques mobiles pendant ces tâches collaboratives<br>This thesis proposes to document the fields of the development of the writing comprehension in L2 among non-specialist publics and the integration of the information and communication technologies for the teaching in Venezuelan context. In order to do this, this research is based on the design, implementation and analysis of two devices of learning English as a foreign language, distant, integrating collaborative tools in the context of the faculty of engineering of the University of Carabobo in Venezuela. These two devices allow the collection of researching data and ecological data, which are structured in corpus and then processed. From these heterogeneous data, the collaborative processes between student-engineers in L2 reading tasks, the development of written comprehension skills and the use of mobile electronic devices during these collaborative tasks
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Roa, Michelle L. "Millennial students' preferred learning style| Evaluation of collaborative learning versus traditional lecture methods." Thesis, Nova Southeastern University, 2014. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3640067.

Full text
Abstract:
<p> <b>Background.</b> Nurse educators are challenged with a new generation of students referred to as the Millennial generation. These millennial students, who have different learning style preferences, are testing the traditional pedagogical methods of nurse educators such as lecture. The social nature of millennial students coincides with the social constructivism theory that students learn in groups. </p><p> <b>Purpose.</b> The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to examine if there was an improved retention of knowledge in millennial students who were taught by collaborative learning strategies rather than the traditional lecture method in an associate degree nursing program. Additionally, the study examined if learning by the students' preferred learning style resulted in a higher level of achievement on a comprehensive standardized examination versus learning by a nonpreferred style. </p><p> <b>Theoretical Framework.</b> The theoretical framework for this study was founded on the social constructivism theory suggesting students build knowledge through social group interactions. </p><p> <b>Methods.</b> The quasi-experimental study was conducted at an associate degree program in the Midwest. The nonprobability purposive sampling was utilized to examine the means of a comprehensive standardized examination and a learning styles preference assessment. </p><p> <b>Results.</b> The statistical analysis utilizing the analysis of covariance did not produce statistically significant findings in the differences in the comprehensive standardized examination score means between the students taught by the lecture method and students taught by the collaborative method when controlled for the cumulative grade point average. Additionally, the study did not find statistically significant differences in mean comprehensive standardized examination scores when taught by the students' preferred learning style versus being taught by their nonpreferred style. </p><p> <b>Conclusions.</b> Although not significant, the study did find students who were taught by the collaborative method had higher scores than those who were taught by the lecture method. In addition, learning styles preferences were not significant in determining academic success. The implications of the study are significant to nursing education by highlighting the importance of using collaborative activities and multiple teaching modalities.</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Roa, Michelle. "Millennial students' preferred learning style : evaluation of collaborative learning versus traditional lecture methods." Thesis, NSUWorks, 2013. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/hpd_con_stuetd/6.

Full text
Abstract:
Nurse educators are challenged with a new generation of students referred to as the Millennial generation. These millennial students, who have different learning style preferences, are testing the traditional pedagogical methods of nurse educators such as lecture. The social nature of millennial students coincides with the social constructivism theory that students learn in groups. The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to examine if there was an improved retention of knowledge in millennial students who were taught by collaborative learning strategies rather than the traditional lecture method in an associate degree nursing program. Additionally, the study examined if learning by the students' preferred learning style resulted in a higher level of achievement on a comprehensive standardized examination versus learning by a nonpreferred style. The theoretical framework for this study was founded on the social constructivism theory suggesting students build knowledge through social group interactions. The quasi-experimental study was conducted at an associate degree program in the Midwest. The nonprobability purposive sampling was utilized to examine the means of a comprehensive standardized examination and a learning styles preference assessment. The statistical analysis utilizing the analysis of covariance did not produce statistically significant findings in the differences in the comprehensive standardized examination score means between the students taught by the lecture method and students taught by the collaborative method when controlled for the cumulative grade point average. Additionally, the study did not find statistically significant differences in mean comprehensive standardized examination scores when taught by the students' preferred learning style versus being taught by their nonpreferred style. Although not significant, the study did find students who were taught by the collaborative method had higher scores than those who were taught by the lecture method. In addition, learning styles preferences were not significant in determining academic success. The implications of the study are significant to nursing education by highlighting the importance of using collaborative activities and multiple teaching modalities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Pohl, Alexander Verfasser], and François [Akademischer Betreuer] [Bry. "Fostering awareness and collaboration in large-class lectures : principles and evaluation of the Backchannel Backstage / Alexander Pohl. Betreuer: François Bry." München : Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 2015. http://d-nb.info/1081628839/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Anderson, Dianne S. "The impact of writing and collaborative problem solving on student achievement and attitude in intermediate algebra /." ProQuest subscription required:, 1999. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=990270451&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=8813&RQT=309&VName=PQD.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hébert, Manon. "Co-élaboration du sens dans les cercles littéraires entre pairs en première secondaire étude des relations entre les modalités de lecture et de collaboration /." [Montréal] : Université de Montréal, 2002. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/umontreal/fullcit?pNQ82707.

Full text
Abstract:
Thèse (Ph. D.)--Université de Montréal, 2003.<br>"NQ-82707." "Thèse présentée à la faculté des études supérieures en vue de l'obtention du grade de philosophiae doctor en sciences de l'éducation, option didactique." Version électronique également disponible sur Internet.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Dessaigne, Elsa. "Le distributeur B to B, orchestrateur de relations collaboratives : lecture dynamique de la position des distributeurs professionnels au sein de leurs réseaux." Thesis, Lyon, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020LYSE3024.

Full text
Abstract:
Dans cette thèse, nous proposons une nouvelle grille de lecture de la position des distributeurs B to B dans leur réseau de relations. A partir d’une étude de cas approfondie sur les distributeurs de matériel électrique français, nous montrons que la position des distributeurs B to B dans leur réseau constitue une ressource essentielle pour l’ensemble des acteurs du réseau. Les distributeurs de matériel électriques disposent en effet de ressources et de rôles spécifiques, qui leur permettent de jouer un rôle institutionnel important. En analysant les arrangements institutionnels (Vargo et Lusch, 2016) à l’œuvre dans le réseau de la distribution de matériel électrique, nous montrons que les distributeurs de matériel électrique sont aujourd’hui en position d’orchestrer les relations au sein de leur réseau, et d’aligner les acteurs de ce réseau autour d’un intérêt commun, l’amélioration de la performance globale par la satisfaction des clients finaux. En ce sens, nous proposons de considérer les distributeurs de matériel électrique comme des Network Stewards, des orchestrateurs de relations collaboratives au sein de leur réseau<br>This dissertation provides a new understanding of the position of B to B distributors within their network of relationships. Thanks to an in-depth case study in the French distribution network of electrical equipment (EE), we highlight the position of distributors as a key resource to every actor of the electrical equipment sector. B to B distributors of electrical equipment have indeed specific resources that enable them to play their own roles. To distributors those resources are also a keystone to develop their institutional role within the network.In line with Vargo and Lusch (2016) we analyze the institutional arrangements that exist in the French EE distribution network. Thanks to them distributors have the position to orchestrate the relationships among their network. They can namely align the different actors of the network along a common interest, i.e the improved performance of the whole network through the satisfaction of end-users. That’s the reason why we propose to consider EE distributors as Network Stewards, who orchestrate the relationships in their network in a collaborative way
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bouchet, Karine. "Repenser la prise de notes pour les étudiants internationaux en contexte académique : implémentation du dispositif collaboratif Unipad à l'IEP de lyon." Thesis, Lyon, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018LYSE2079/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Cette thèse fait état d’une recherche-action menée entre 2014 et 2018 à l’Institut d’Étude Politiques de Lyon (IEP), autour de l’analyse des difficultés rencontrées par les étudiants internationaux dans l’activité de prise de notes en cours magistral.A partir des besoins constatés sur le terrain, nous avons implémenté un dispositif collaboratif de prise de notes, baptisé Unipad, au sein des amphithéâtres de l’IEP. Unipad est basé sur un modèle de collaboration reliant des étudiants allophones et francophones autour de l’usage synchrone d’un pad (éditeur de texte partagé). Il vise à repenser les pratiques individuelles deprise de notes et la manière d’accompagner les étudiants allophones en cursus disciplinaire. Notre enquête met en regard la situation précédent Unipad (phase 1) et celle lui succédant (phase 2). Les résultats font état des potentialités du dispositif au regard des difficultés de départ, d’un point de vue académique (richesse et qualité des PDN grâce à une dynamique coopérative et des stratégies de réception différenciées) et socioaffectif (entraide, reconnaissance, empathie et émergence d’un sentiment de communauté). La mise en œuvre de cet accompagnement technopédagogique au cœur des cours magistraux vise à répondre à des besoins encore difficilement pris en charge par la didactique du Français Langue Étrangère, et à contribuer aux réflexions menées dans le champ Français sur Objectif Universitaire autour de l’accompagnement et l’intégration des étudiants internationaux de l’enseignement supérieur francophone<br>This thesis details a research project conducted between 2014 and 2018 at the Institut d’Études Politiques de Lyon (IEP), concerning the analysis of note taking difficulties encountered by international students during lectures. From requirements observed in the field, we implemented the use of a collaborative note-taking device, called a Unipad, within IEP classrooms. Based on a cooperative model connecting international and francophone students around the synchronous use of a pad (with shared text editor), this device aims to rethink individual note-taking practices and the means by which international students follow their course of study. Our research compares the situation before (Phase 1) and after (Phase 2) use of the Unipad. The results show the potential of the system with regards to initial difficulties, an academic point of view (wealth and quality of notes owing to a cooperative dynamic, differentiated reception strategies) and from a socio-emotional perspective (mutualaid, recognition, empathy and the emergence of a sense of community).The implementation of this tech teaching aid in lectures aims to meet needs which are still misunderstood within the French as a Foreign Language sector of education, and contribute to the observations made in the French for Academic Pursposes field, concerning the accompaniment and integration of international students in French higher education
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Su, Allie Yuying. "Doctoral Thesis Recital (collaborative piano) lecture." 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/19511.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Bunchman, Michael. "Doctoral thesis recital (lecture) collaborative piano." 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/29179.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Fan, Wenci. "Doctoral thesis recital (lecture) collaborative piano." 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/29578.

Full text
Abstract:
"Teaching collaborative piano concepts through Paule Maurice's Tableux de Provence and Witold Lutoslawski's Dance preludes" -- Tableux de Provence for saxophone and piano / Paule Maurice -- Dance preludes for clarinet and piano / Witold Lutoslawski.<br>text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Hébert, Manon. "Co-élaboration du sens dans les cercles littéraires entre pairs en première secondaire : étude des relations entre les modalités de lecture et de collaboration." Thèse, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/6794.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

LoPresto, Michael C. "Comparing modern methods of active & collaborative learning & learner-centered teaching to traditional lectures." Thesis, 2012. https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/31454/1/31454_LoPresto_2012_thesis.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
The main goals of this project are; to develop and assess the effectiveness of learner centered activities for introductory astronomy that focus on solar system topics and; to test the methods of learner-centered instruction themselves through the implementation of these activities and their assessments. The intended end of the project is to have developed entire solar system :"unit" consisting of learner-centered activities on solar system topics that have been tested for their effectiveness. Since 2000, many resources for active and collaborative learning in introductory astronomy have been developed. This is especially true for two of the four the main sections of a traditional introductory college astronomy course, the observed motions in the sky and light, the Sun and stars. There is currently considered to be a dearth of activities pertaining specifically to solar system topics, also considered one of the four main sections of a traditional course. For instance, the leading Lecture-Tutorial (LT) workbook (Prather et al., 2007) has 38 LTs, 14 of them, 37% are about topics related to the observed motions in the sky and 16, 42% are topics related to light, the Sun and stars. Of the remaining 8, only 4, 11%, are about topics traditionally covered in a solar system unit, one each on the Earth's surface, the formation of the solar system, the size and scale of solar system objects and extra solar planets. There are tutorials on planetary motion and gravity, but these are topics generally covered in the earlier motions and history unit. The last 4 LTs are about galaxies and cosmology. Research investigating student pre-instruction beliefs and reasoning difficulties in cosmology, considered the fourth main section of a traditional astronomy course, is also underway as is the development and assessment of instructional materials. (CATS projects/ Research on Students Beliefs and Reasoning Difficulties related to Cosmology http://astronomy101.jpl.nasa.gov/cats/projects/) Another reason for development of more material covering solar system topics is for research to better understand student learning in these areas. An assessment instrument the Solar System Concepts Inventory, SSCI that is under development and preliminary testing will eventually be used for this purpose. The availability of more material to assess will aid in the validation of the survey and then the survey itself will in turn aid in the development of even more new materials. (CATS projects / Solar System Concept Inventory (SSCI) & Solar System Lecture-Tutorials Project,http://astronomy101.jpl.nasa.gov/cats/projects/) Assessment instruments on light and spectra, the Light and Spectroscopy Inventory, LSCI (Bardar et al., 2007), and stellar topics, the Star Properties Concept Inventory, SPCI (Bailey, 2008), already exist and have been field tested (Bardar, 2008), used in research (Prather et al., 2008, Prather et al. 2009), and used to test instruction materials (Barder & Brecher 2008, LoPresto & Murrell, 2009) as does a good amount of instructional material on these topics. (Prather et al., 2007). Assessment instruments on cosmology are also under development. (Wallace et al., 2011). The activities developed, implemented and assessed for this project, in the order that they were assigned during a solar system unit, are; 1-The HFCC Solar System Walk 2-Comparative Planetology 3-Formation of the Solar System 4-Extra-Solar Planets 5-Comets 6-Surface Conditions of Terrestrial Planets 1-Planetary Geology 2-Planetary Atmospheres A pilot research project that was designed and undertaken to test the viability of this project consisted of using active and collaborative instructional materials that were already in existence on other topics and testing them with an already existing and established assessment instrument. Based on the number of Lecture-Tutorials (LTs) available on the subjects of light, the Sun and stars (Prather et al., 2007) and the existence of an already established concept inventory, the Star Properties Concept Inventory (SPCI) (Bailey, 2008), light, the Sun and stars, usually the third 'unit' of a general education introductory astronomy course, was chosen. The experimental design of the different studies in this project is similar to that of the pilot project. In general, students were given pretest and posttest assessments so gains in groups receiving different methods of instruction could be compared. The scores of students who did the activities were compared to students that did not do the activities and were rather taught the same topics through more traditional lectures. The assessment instrument used was the Solar System Survey, 25-item multiple-choice items on solar system topics developed and validated for this project to test the instructional materials developed and the instructional methods they employ. In efforts to minimize instructor bias and the Hawthorn Effect (Hake, 1998, from Slavin, 1992) different instructors involved in the studies were assigned to teach different sections both by lecture and by learner-centered methods. Also, in the final trials of each study, the author taught none of the sections involved. The statistical significance of results were evaluated in two ways. When the performance of two groups on a set of assessment questions was being compared, the average score of each group and the standard error were calculated. The standard errors were considered the error-bars around each average. The less overlap in the error bars, the more significant the result. If there was no overlap the difference in the average scores of the two groups was considered statistically significant. When the results of different groups on specific assessment items were compared the statistical significance of results were evaluated by chi-squared tests with 2 x2 contingency tables. The numbers of students giving correct and incorrect responses in each group were put into 2 x 2 contingency tables that were used to calculate. P-values. The lower the P-value the more significant the result, P=0.05 being considered the maximum value for a significant result.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Provencher, Julie. "Le rôle des stratégies de justification lors de l'élaboration de réponses à la suite d'une lecture : une recherche collaborative menée en 2e et en 4e année du primaire." Thesis, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/24280.

Full text
Abstract:
La présente recherche collaborative vise à mieux cerner le concept de justification à la suite d’une lecture littéraire. Plus précisément, nous avons identifié les stratégies justificatives utilisées par des élèves de 2e année (N=5) et de 4e année (N=6) et les enseignantes de 2e et de 4e année (N=2, soit une enseignante par niveau) lors de l’élaboration de leurs réponses à la suite d’une lecture oralisée par les enseignantes. Nous voulions également vérifier si le degré d’étayage offert avait un impact sur la fréquence et la diversité des stratégies justificatives utilisées par les élèves de 2e et de 4e année. Trois dispositifs didactiques ont été utilisés : la lecture interactive, la lecture REP (Réfléchir-Échanger-Partager) et le cercle de lecture. Les enseignantes de 2e et de 4e année ont utilisé les mêmes albums et les mêmes questions liées aux quatre dimensions de la lecture (compréhension, interprétation, réaction, jugement critique plus particulièrement lié à l’appréciation d’un texte littéraire) avec leurs élèves lors des discussions. Les enseignantes ont également évalué les justifications écrites des élèves et elles ont exprimé à voix haute les critères d’évaluation sur lesquels elles se sont appuyées pour juger de la qualité d’une justification. Nos résultats indiquent que 16 stratégies justificatives sont utilisées par les élèves ou les enseignantes : Appel à un extrait, une citation ou un exemple tirés du texte; Appel à un exemple qui n’est PAS tiré du texte ou de son expérience personnelle; Appel aux illustrations; Appel à une comparaison; Appel à des images fortes ou à des métaphores; Appel à un message à portée philosophique; Appel à son expérience personnelle; Appel à la visualisation; Appel aux propos des pairs, de l’enseignante ou de l’autorité; Appel à des informations implicites; Appel aux intentions des personnages; Appel aux intentions de l’auteur ou de l’illustrateur; Appel à porter un jugement; Appel à des indices linguistiques; Appel à utiliser le métalangage du schéma narratif et Appel à des mots précis pour exprimer sa justification. Les élèves de 4e année utilisent davantage de stratégies justificatives, soit en fréquence, mais également en variété lors de l’élaboration de leurs justifications. Ils sont également les seuls à utiliser la stratégie justificative Appel à des indices linguistiques. Nous avons recensé plusieurs techniques utilisées par les enseignantes de 2e et de 4e année pour soutenir les élèves lors de l’élaboration de leurs justifications. D’ailleurs, nos résultats indiquent que les capacités justificatives des élèves varient selon le degré d’étayage offert par les enseignantes (Approche partagée et guidée). Pour la lecture interactive, les élèves de 2e année « apprennent à utiliser » leurs stratégies justificatives dans ce dispositif grâce aux stratégies modélisées, partagées et guidées et les élèves de 4e année « développent leur autonomie » en utilisant leurs stratégies justificatives en lecture interactive de façon autonome. Nous constatons également que l’emploi des stratégies justificatives de haut niveau par les enseignantes pousse les élèves à utiliser des stratégies qu’ils utilisent peu ou pas habituellement. La lecture REP est le dispositif didactique qui a permis de générer le plus de stratégies justificatives de la part des élèves de 2e année. Grâce à sa structure, plusieurs niveaux d’étayage sont possibles, ce qui permet aux élèves de 2e et de 4e année de s’entraider dans la construction de leurs justifications (approche guidée par les pairs). Le cercle de lecture, tel qu’utilisé par les enseignantes dans le cadre de cette recherche, s’avère le dispositif le moins efficace pour les élèves de 2e année. La baisse du nombre de stratégies justificatives observées est directement liée au faible niveau d’étayage offert par l’enseignante. En revanche, le cercle de lecture apparaît comme un dispositif didactique plus pertinent pour les élèves de 4e année. C’est d’ailleurs le dispositif qui a généré le plus de stratégies justificatives de leur part. Par sa structure, il permet aux élèves d’aider leurs pairs (approche guidée par les pairs), mais également de coconstruire la discussion. Finalement, les deux enseignantes qui ont participé à ce projet de recherche identifient davantage de stratégies justificatives utilisées par leurs élèves et elles ont modifié leurs critères d’évaluation pour juger de la qualité d’une bonne justification lors de la deuxième phase d’évaluation. Nous croyons que d’orienter la formation vers l’évaluation en aide à l’apprentissage permettrait aux enseignants du Québec de mieux identifier, rétroagir et réguler les stratégies justificatives de leurs élèves.<br>This collaborative research aims to better understand the concept of reading response. More specifically, we have identified the strategies used by 2nd (N=5) and 4th grade students (N=6) and teachers (N=2) when developing their responses. We also wanted to check whether the degree of support offered had an impact on the frequency or diversity of the response strategies used by 2nd and 4th grade students. Three didactic methods were used: the interactive read aloud, the think-pair-share strategy and literature circles. Teachers in Grades 2 and 4 used the same literature books and the same questions related to the four dimensions of reading (comprehension, interpretation, reaction and critical judgement) with their students during the discussions. The teachers also assessed the students' written responses and we identified the criteria they used to judge the quality of a good response. Our results indicate that 16 response strategies were used by students or teachers to develop their response to literature: Use of an excerpt, a quote or an example from the text, Use of an example that is NOT taken from the text or its personal experience, Use of an illustration, Making a comparison, Use of a strong image or metaphor, Use of a philosophical message, Use of a personal experience or a connection with one's life, Visualization, Reinvesting the response of a peer, teacher or authority, Use of implicit information or inferences, Use of characterization, Noticing author’s purpose and illustrator’s intent, Use of a judgment, Use of linguistic cues, Use of structures and features of the narrative text to describe an element of the story and finally, Use of specific and precise words to respond. Grade 4 students use more response strategies, not only in frequency, but also in variety when developing their reading responses. They are also the only ones to use the response strategy: Use of linguistic cues. Several techniques are used by 2nd and 4th grade teachers to support students in developing their responses. Our results indicate that the students' responses strategies vary according to the degree of support offered by the teachers (shared and guided approach). 8 Regarding the results related to the interactive read aloud, 2nd grade students "learn to use" their strategies in this didactic method through modeled, shared and guided strategies. 4th grade students "develop their autonomy" by using their response strategies independently during interactive read alouds. We also find that the use of high-level response strategies by teachers pushes students to use response strategies that they don’t usually, or rarely, use. The Think-Pair-Share strategy is the didactic method that has generated the most response strategies on the part of 2nd grade students. Thanks to its structure, several levels of support are possible, which allows the students to help each other in the construction of their responses (peer-guided approach). Literature circles turn out to be the least effective method for 2nd grade students. The drop in the number of response strategies observed is directly linked to the low level of support offered by the teacher. On the other hand, literature circles are an interesting didactic method for 4th grade students. It is the method that generated the most response strategies. By its very structure, it allows students to help their peers (peer-guided approach), but also to co-construct the discussion. Finally, the teachers who participated in this research project identified more response strategies at the end of this project than they did before it began. We also note that their evaluation criteria for judging the quality of a good response deepened during the second evaluation phase. More research is needed to better understand the teaching practices that promote the development of reading response. We believe that orienting training towards formative assessment would allow teachers in Quebec to better identify, give feedback and support the response strategies of their students.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Dupin, de Saint-André Marie. "L’évolution des pratiques de lecture à haute voix d’enseignantes expertes et leur influence sur le développement de l’habileté des élèves du préscolaire à faire des inférences." Thèse, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/6854.

Full text
Abstract:
La présente recherche collaborative vise à étudier les pratiques de lecture à haute voix d’enseignantes expertes et leur influence sur le développement de l’habileté des élèves du préscolaire à faire des inférences. Plus précisément, nous décrivons les interventions, lors des lectures à haute voix, de quatre enseignantes expertes que nous avons formées pour travailler la compréhension inférentielle et les comparons à celles de deux enseignantes expertes non formées (objectif 1). Puis, nous examinons l’influence de leurs pratiques de lecture à haute voix sur le développement de l’habileté à faire des inférences de leurs élèves (n=92) (objectif 2). Enfin, nous nous intéressons, à titre exploratoire, au potentiel de la recherche collaborative comme voie de développement professionnel des enseignants (objectif 3). Afin d’atteindre nos objectifs, nous avons observé les enseignantes à quatre reprises, lors de lectures d’albums de littérature de jeunesse. Les données obtenues à partir de ces pratiques observées ont été complétées par celles issues des pratiques déclarées des enseignantes pour toute la durée de la recherche (neuf semaines). De plus, nous avons évalué l’habileté à réaliser des inférences des élèves de ces six enseignantes à deux reprises, au début et à la fin de la recherche. Finalement, les enseignantes ont rempli deux questionnaires écrits sur l’impact de cette recherche sur leurs pratiques, l’un à la fin de la recherche et l’autre deux ans après celle-ci. Nos résultats indiquent que si toutes les enseignantes travaillaient les inférences, il existe cependant des différences notables dans leur façon de mener ce travail. Trois des enseignantes formées (enseignantes 1, 2 et 3) ont majoritairement privilégié la co-élaboration du sens des épisodes implicites et se sont montrées très efficaces pour soutenir leurs élèves dans ce travail de construction du sens. L’autre enseignante formée (enseignante 4), en raison d’une appropriation difficile du contenu de la formation, n’est pas parvenue à offrir à ses élèves un étayage adéquat, malgré ses nombreuses tentatives pour les amener à faire des inférences. Les enseignantes non formées (enseignantes 5 et 6) ont, quant à elles, misé plus fréquemment sur la transmission du sens des épisodes implicites et ont également soutenu moins efficacement leurs élèves dans l’élaboration du sens. Ces différences dans la façon de travailler les inférences se sont répercutées sur la progression des élèves entre le début et la fin de la recherche. Ceux des enseignantes 1, 2 et 3 obtiennent des résultats significativement supérieurs à ceux des trois autres enseignantes. Ainsi, il ne suffit pas de travailler les inférences lors des lectures à haute voix pour assurer la progression des élèves. D’autres facteurs revêtent aussi une grande importance : le choix d’oeuvres de qualité, l’engagement des élèves dans les discussions pour co-élaborer le sens et l’étayage adéquat de l’enseignant. Enfin, il semblerait que l’activité réflexive suscitée lors d’une participation à une recherche collaborative et le soutien offert par l’étudiante-chercheuse aient donné aux enseignantes la possibilité d’apporter des changements durables dans leurs pratiques. En ce sens, la recherche collaborative paraît être une voie prometteuse pour contribuer au développement professionnel des enseignants.<br>This collaborative research is an attempt to study expert teachers' reading aloud practices and their impact on the development of preschool students’ ability to make inferences. First, the interventions of four expert teachers specifically trained to work inferences while reading aloud are described and compared with those of two non trained expert teachers (objective 1). Next, the impact of all teachers’ practices on the development of their students’ ability to make inferences (n=92) is examined (objective 2). Finally, we look into collaborative research as a way to support professional development for teachers (objective 3). In order to attain our objectives, we observed participant teachers four times while they were reading children’s books. Data gathered from those observations were completed with other data provided by the teachers about their practices over a nine-week period. Moreover, the ability of the students to make inferences was assessed twice: once at the beginning and once at the end of the research. Teachers also completed two written questionnaires, one at the beginning and the other 2 years after the end of this research, concerning the impacts of their participation in this research on their practices. While all teachers worked inferences with their students, our results showed that there are significant differences in the way they do it. Three of the trained teachers (number 1, 2, and 3) predominantly put emphasis on co-elaboration of the implicit episodes’ meaning and gave their students appropriate scaffolding. Because she found it difficult to assimilate training contents, the other trained teacher (number 4) failed - not without numerous attempts - to offer the same kind of scaffolding. As for the two non trained teachers (number 5 and 6), they gave preference to the transmission of the implicit episodes’ meaning, and supported their students less efficiently when they tried to elaborate it. The differences in how the work on inferences was done had an impact on students’ progression from the beginning to the end of the research. Three of the trained teachers’ students had significantly superior results in comparison to the others’. Therefore, a specific work on inferences only does not ensure that students will make progress. There are other important contributing factors: choosing quality books, students’ involvement in discussions in order to co-elaborate the text’s meaning, and appropriate scaffolding from the teacher. Finally, according to our results, a participation in a collaborative research, which promotes reflexivity and offers coaching, seems to give the teachers the opportunity to bring about long-term changes in their practices. In consequence, a participation in that type of research appears to contribute to teachers’ professional development.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Osman, Ali. "Experiences of physics teachers when implementing problem-based learning : a case study at Entsikeni cluster in the Harry Gwala District Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa." Diss., 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/25794.

Full text
Abstract:
Problem-based learning (PBL) is an active teaching strategy that could be implemented in the South African educational system to assist in developing problem-solving skills, critical thinking skills, collaborative skills, self-directed learning and intrinsic motivation in students. Even though it is not easy to drift from a teacher-centred strategy to a student-centred strategy, but this drift is supposed to be a paradigm drift for the nation. ‘Physics is difficult’ has been the anthem of students in South African high schools. This has led to lower pass rates in physics and as a result low physics career person in society. Physics students in high schools need to be exposed to the PBL strategy since the PBL strategy focuses on real-life problems to develop problem-solving skills, critical thinking skills and self-directed learning in students which are the skills needed for concept formation in Physical Science. Basically, the education of Physical Science students focused on the ability to acquire skills to solve real-life problems. This study focuses on exploring the experiences of high school physics teachers at Entsikeni cluster, South African, when implementing problem-based learning (PBL) in their physics classrooms. The study uses the mixed-method approach where three different research instruments were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data sequentially. Questionnaires, RTOP and interview protocol were employed. The findings of the study indicate that teachers project positive attitudes toward the PBL strategy but may probably not continue to use it because it requires more time than that which is allocated in the Curriculum Assessment and Policy Statement (CAPS) Physical Science document and as a result may not be able to finish their ATP on time. Teachers are teaching physics with no specialization in physics, which probably could lead to poor, pass rates in Physical Science. Teachers were inexperienced in teaching physics in the FET and could probably affect students’ academic performance. It is recommended they apply the PBL strategy to correct the negative effect of their inexperience on students’ performance. It is evident that if inexperienced trained teachers apply an instructional strategy based on research, they tend to develop students' performance as compared to applying the traditional instructional strategy.<br>Science and Technology Education<br>M. Sc. (Physics Education)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography