Relevant bibliographies by topics / Liveability Index

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Liveability Index'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 5 June 2025
Last updated: 16 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Liveability Index.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Liveability Index"

1

Shraddha, Thorat, Pathak Sanjay, and Raisoni Harshad. "Analyzing Liveability Index Parameters for Formulating Assessment Model at the Zone Level– A case of Pune City." International Journal of Progressive Research in Science and Engineering 4, no. 9 (2023): 17–23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8397977.

Full text
Abstract:
The Liveability Index is a tool designed to help cities measure their performance in contrast to local, national, and global standards and encourage them to embrace an "outcome-based" approach to urban planning and management. It attempts to provide an organized evaluation of a city's liveability by considering many factors and measures. However, the Liveability Index does not contain explicit advice on how to improve these aspects, which is critical for increasing the liveability of communities. Develop plans and actions to address the identified parameters and help enhance them in order to move the goal of improving liveability forward. Although the Liveability Index provides a framework for assessment, it makes no recommendations for action. As a result, it is up to stakeholders, decision-makers, and urban planners to use the index's findings to develop real solutions to improve the liveability of their respective cities. The diverse methodology and criteria utilized make comparing the Liveability Index results across different locations challenging. The index's dimensions and metrics may not be universally relevant or effective in all locations and conditions, particularly in underdeveloped countries where there are considerations and obstacles. As a result, it is critical to develop context-specific liveability indices that consider each region's particular demands, conditions, and culture. To close this gap, the proposed research would identify and investigate a few key elements in determining liveability. The process entails reviewing existing data, collecting, and analyzing new data, identifying key parameters, and developing a liveability rating system. This comprehensive assessment approach will provide a framework for evaluating the liveability of various city zones. The evaluation procedure, once created, will be valuable to stakeholders, decision-makers, and urban planners. They can use this model to gain insight into the liveability strengths and weaknesses of distinct zones within a city and make decisions to improve overall liveability. The goal is to provide these stakeholders with the knowledge they need to prioritize and implement policies that will increase the standard of living for inhabitants in various zones, hence improving the city's overall livability.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Liu, L. "THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LIVEABILITY AND PRICE OF RESIDENTIAL HOUSES – A CASE STUDY OF SHENZHEN." ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-3/W10 (February 7, 2020): 141–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-3-w10-141-2020.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract. This study proposes an index for cities in China to measure the liveability of real estate. This liveability index combines indicators from four dimensions including education, transportation, living facilities and entertainment, and can be quickly obtained by using data of Point of Interest, based on popular internet maps. Then, using Shenzhen as a sample city, correlation analysis has been adopted to examine the relationship between this liveability index and housing price. The results show that, the liveability index can well reflect the real-world situation of the city. Moreover, a weak but significant relationship can be found between liveability and the housing price. The results of this study not only can be used for urban residents to search a proper housing estate, but also can assistant urban planners and policy makers to get a general map of the spatial structure of the city.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Valcárcel-Aguiar, Beatriz, Pilar Murias, and David Rodríguez-González. "Sustainable Urban Liveability: A Practical Proposal Based on a Composite Indicator." Sustainability 11, no. 1 (2018): 86. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11010086.

Full text
Abstract:
This article presents a proposal for a composite index to assess the degree of sustainable urban liveability. It makes two key contributions to this field of study. The first is a proposal for the concept of sustainable urban liveability that includes the need to meet a minimum number of environmental conditions in terms of resource consumption and the deterioration of the environment. The second contribution is the use of a non-compensatory aggregation technique in order to construct the composite index. This kind of aggregation technique does not allow trade-offs between partial indicators. In the particular context of sustainable urban liveability, it prevents poor performance by the natural environment indicators from being compensated by positive results in the remaining indicators. The proposed composite index for sustainable urban liveability is applied to the case of 58 Spanish cities. The results reveal significant differences in the degree of sustainable urban liveability for this group of cities, but more importantly, they highlight the potential of this proposal for urban management.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Tan, Khee Giap, Tongxin NIE, and Shinae Baek. "Empirical assessment on the liveability of cities in the Greater China Region." Competitiveness Review 26, no. 1 (2016): 2–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/cr-11-2015-0087.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose – This paper aims to apply a comprehensive Liveability Cities index to rank the liveability of 100 cities in the Greater China Region. Against the backdrop of the ongoing trend of rapid and extensive urbanisation observed in China, “liveability” is being given an increasingly higher priority by the Chinese government. However, there has been no attempt to empirically measure this concept and to examine its nexus to the narrower concept of competitiveness. Design/methodology/approach – The index is based on 96 indicators across five environments, namely, economic vibrancy and competitiveness; environmental friendliness and sustainability; domestic security and stability; socio-cultural conditions; and political governance. Findings – The empirical results show that Hong Kong, Macau and cities in Taiwan generally perform well in overall liveability rankings, while first-tier cities in mainland China (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen) do not find a place among the top ranks. Originality/value – The rankings and simulation exercise aim to provide Chinese policy makers with a framework to assess the liveability of China’s cities and suggests indicative policy suggestions that can be taken to improve overall liveability.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Chi, Yan Ling, and Hugo Wai Leung Mak. "From Comparative and Statistical Assessments of Liveability and Health Conditions of Districts in Hong Kong towards Future City Development." Sustainability 13, no. 16 (2021): 8781. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13168781.

Full text
Abstract:
Liveability is an indispensable component in future city planning and is practically linked with the health status of individuals and communities. However, there was nor comprehensive and universal district-level framework for assessing liveability due to geospatial and social discrepancies among different countries. In this study, using Hong Kong, a highly dense and international city as an example, the Liveability and Health Index (LHI-HK) consisting of 30 indicators was established, with 21 of them related to education, economy, housing, walkability/transport, environment, and health facilities aspects, while the health conditions of citizens in individual districts were examined by other 9 indicators. Respective scoring allocation was determined by statistical reasoning, and was applied to quantify the connections between liveability and health among the 18 districts of Hong Kong in both 2016 and 2019. Temporal changes of spatial features could be traced by this quantitative framework, and obvious correlations between liveability and health were attained, with R values of 0.496 and 0.518 in 2016 and 2019, and corresponding slopes of 0.80 and 0.88, respectively. Based on the statistical results, it was found that Sai Kung and Kwun Tong are the most and the least liveable district of Hong Kong in 2019. The LHI-HK index was well-validated by renowned AARP liveability index and The California Healthy Places Index (HPI), with R values of 0.90 and 0.70, and the potential uncertainties due to data projection were less than 2.5% for all districts, which implicates its relevancy and appropriateness in conducting similar spatial assessments in international cities. Further, both favorable and unfavorable spatial arrangements of each of the 3 district types in Hong Kong were identified, namely residential, commercial, and industrial districts. This opens new windows in enhancing liveability and health status within communities, with the aim of promoting the sustainability of cities in the long run.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Satiawan, P. R., S. A. R. Irawan, S. A. Zahra, et al. "Towards a liveable city: Measuring the liveability index in Tuban Regency, East Java." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1353, no. 1 (2024): 012020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1353/1/012020.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract A liveable city is an urban planning concept where the city as a public space focuses on the social life and the entire community. Tuban Regency is one of the regencies in East Java that intends to measure the liveability of its city. For the first experiment, the measurement was conducted before and after the pandemic (2020 to 2023). This research tries to measure the liveability index at the regency level. The measurement uses district data units to measure the regency liveability index achievement in more detail. The result shows that the rural area index is higher than the urban in terms of the environment, food security, housing and settlements, and accessibility/transportation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Othman, Irma Wani, Azmin Pullong, and Ismail Maidin. "THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF LIVEABILITY AND INCLUSIVE COMMUNITY IN RELATION TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT." Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management 7, no. 29 (2022): 294–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.35631/jthem.729020.

Full text
Abstract:
The primary focus of this paper's discussion is the enhancement of the concept of liveability (KDH) in relation to development of a country in terms of economic growth, and the environment. This paper addresses liveability concept (KDH) as one of the crucial elements in the formation of Inclusive Communities (KI). It relates to the development of a country with a quality and good atmosphere, as well as unity amongst communities, in order to ensure the community's well-being in a country. Among the issues debated are (i) the transformation of rural development in developing and building competitive rural communities on par with urban communities, (ii) the formation of inclusive and liveable communities, (iii) the realisation of the national liveability index, and (iv) well-being & sustainability of life. This paper uses secondary sources, such as study results published in journals, scholarly literature, internet news sources, and public forums, to employ a qualitative methodology. According to the findings of the study, the measures employed by a country to measure its liveability, such as the liveability index, have a significant role in ensuring the health and sustainability of communal life. The focus of the future study is on the importance of a country's agenda being sensitive to the balance between developing and increasingly developed nations. This is consistent with the issues, difficulties, and strategies of a country undergoing a phase or process of implementing the liveability index framework.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ghozi, Saiful, Ida Bagus Dharmawan, Dessy Handa Sari, Tizar M. Bijaksana, and Suheriah M. Devi. "An analysis of the perceived liveability index with the use of adjusted and weighted aspects based on a multi-stakeholder perspective in the Indonesian city of Balikpapan." Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum 22, no. 2 (2023): 131–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.31648/aspal.7829.

Full text
Abstract:
Motives: Dynamic strategic issues have raised concerns about perceived liveability measurements to maintain a high quality of life that affects the residents’ wellbeing. Liveability aspects and indicators should be adjusted to accurately identify local issues and living conditions, and to promote community participation. Rigorous research methods with more representative samples are required to improve the accuracy of perceived liveability analyses in a specific context. Aim: The aim of this study was to measure the perceived liveability index in the Indonesian city of Balikpapan. The economic development of Balikpapan relies heavily on natural resources, and the city will be affected by the government’s plan to relocate the Indonesian capital. A survey involving both quantitative and qualitative methods was conducted to analyse perceived liveability in Balikpapan. The aspects and indicators of perceived liveability were adjusted and weighted based on a multi-stakeholder perspective to accurately represent the interests of all stakeholders when calculating the perceived liveability index using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A content analysis of open-ended responses was carried out to analyse the feedback and the problems experienced by Balikpapan residents. The developed approach contributed to a better understanding of the residents’ opinions regarding the quality of life in the city. Results: Eight aspects of perceived liveability consisting of 51-item indicators were defined in this study. These aspects were arranged in the following descending order based on the values of the assigned weights: (1) access to basic utilities, (2) environment and health, (3) social development and security, (4) economy, (5) utility, (6) transport, (7) spatial development, and (8) recreation, culture, and public spaces. The analysis revealed that industrial and urban development in the eastern part of the city is inversely proportional to the perceived liveability index. In turn, urban development plans in the northern part of the city offer better prospects for new urban residents, economic actors, and stakeholders in the future residential design. The two major factors of perceived liveability, namely cleanliness and safety, indicate that the city effectively accommodates the needs of the existing residents, as well as potential migrants. Floods and poor road quality were identified as the most pressing problems in the city. According to the residents, economic problems and job insecurity were the main consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this study can assist the local authorities in enhancing the capacity of urban policies or levels of policy implementation to meet the needs of local residents.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Adewale Yemi Yekeen and Siti Hajar Misnan. "Assessing The Impacts of Urban Planning on Livability in Ilorin, Nigeria." Bioresources and Environment 2, no. 3 (2024): 75–84. https://doi.org/10.24191/bioenv.v2i3.65.

Full text
Abstract:
Urban planning is crucial in enhancing liveable environment for the well-being of humans. This article examines the effects of Urban planning on liveability of the traditional Nigerian city of Ilorin. Adopting a cross-sectional survey design, the research relied essentially on primary data. A structured questionnaire was used to obtain data from 158 randomly selected urban residents. Data collected were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The Relative Importance Index was used to analyse the residents’ awareness of the activities of urban planners. The Respondents' Agreement Index (RAI) was used to measure the effects of urban planning on liveability. Findings revealed a high level of awareness of urban planning activities by the city's residents. Also, effective transportation networks, access to green spaces, waste management, street cleaning, affordable housing, quality healthcare and educational opportunities were identified as the major effects of urban planning activities. This study will aid policy makers in strengthening the physical planning system to build the city’s liveability.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Siagian, L. D. T., P. K. Stefanugroho, Z. Nisa, I. D. M. F. Septanaya, and P. G. Ariastita. "Assessment of liveability on settlements developed by informal land subdividers in Gunung Anyar and Rungkut Districts, Surabaya." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1015, no. 1 (2022): 012015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1015/1/012015.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Acts of settlement development conducted by informal land subdividers were performed without following the existing regulatory framework, leading to uninhabitable settlements. In actuality, settlements ideally are obliged to provide a comfortable space where liveability is the form in which accomplishment is rated. For this reason, this study assessed the liveability of the settlements developed by the informal land subdividers in Gunung Anyar and Rungkut Districts, Surabaya. The study set two objectives, namely formulating the criteria of liveability as well as assessing the level of liveability on settlements developed by the informal land subdividers by means of; 1) conducting interviews with three experts and using quantitative content analysis, and; 2) interviewing inhabiting residents and using gap analysis and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). From the 27 criteria assessed in this study, there is no criterion that is rated satisfactory for said residents, signifying that said settlements are unliveable. When viewed through the Customers Satisfaction Index (CSI), the liveability of said settlements is included in the fair category. Based on the results of the mapping of criteria in the Cartesian IPA quadrant, there are eight criteria which become the main priority for improving performance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Liveability Index"

1

Bennett, Jessica. "New Zealand apartment living : developing a liveability evaluation index : a thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Building Science /." ResearchArchive@Victoria e-Thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10063/1242.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (M.B.Sc.)--Victoria University of Wellington, 2010.<br>Accompanying disc (on p. 371) contains: Appendix K: NZ ALI -- Working examples: NZ ALI for existing buildings ; NZ ALI for existing buildings. Includes bibliographical references.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Liveability Index"

1

Thye, Woo Wing. Ranking the Liveability of the World's Major Cities: The Global Liveable Cities Index. World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ranking the Liveability of the World's Major Cities: The Global Liveable Cities Index. World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ranking the Liveability of the World's Major Cities: The Global Liveable Cities Index. World Scientific Pub Co Inc, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hoang, Phuong. USA Living Index 2019 Connecticut Cities and Towns: Liveability Rating for All Cities and Towns in Connecticut. Independently Published, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hoang, Phuong. USA Living Index 2019 Colorado Cities and Towns: Liveability Rating for All Cities and Towns in Colorado. Independently Published, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hoang, Phuong. USA Living Index 2019 Delaware Cities and Towns: Liveability Rating for All Cities and Towns in Delaware. Independently Published, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hoang, Phuong. USA LIVING INDEX 2019 Alaska Cities and Towns: Complete Liveability Ratings for All Cities and Towns in Alaska. Independently Published, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hoang, Phuong. USA LIVING INDEX 2019 Arizona Cities and Towns: Complete Liveability Ratings for All Cities and Towns in Arizona. Independently Published, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hoang, Phuong. USA Living Index 2019 : Alabama Cities and Towns: Complete Liveability Ratings for All Cities and Towns in Alabama. Independently Published, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Hoang, Phuong. USA Living Index 2019 Arkansas Cities and Towns: Complete Liveability Rating for All Cities and Towns in Arkansas. Independently Published, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Liveability Index"

1

Wang, Jie, Guanghui Wang, Jianwei Qi, Yu Liu, and Tao Zhang. "A Study on Buildings Liveability Index Based on High Resolution Land Cover Data." In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8202-6_25.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Generic Liveability Index." In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_101566.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"Generic Liveability Index." In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_301690.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

"Liveability, Agglomeration and Smart Cities — Influence and Impacts." In Global Liveable and Smart Cities Index. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789811211553_0004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"Urban Housing and Liveability, Concluding Remarks and Future Research Agenda." In Global Liveable and Smart Cities Index. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789811211553_0005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"THE GLOBAL LIVEABLE CITIES INDEX IN PERSPECTIVE." In Ranking the Liveability of the World's Major Cities. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814417310_0005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Liveability Index"

1

Madhushan, A. M. L., and J. Dharmasena. "A STUDY ON QUALITY OF LIFE OF MIDDLE-INCOME GROUP ALONG URBAN CANAL WATERFRONTS." In Beyond sustainability reflections across spaces. Faculty of Architecture Research Unit, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31705/faru.2021.13.

Full text
Abstract:
In most of the cases, canal network in Greater Colombo region work as the drainage system of the urban area and as the backyard of the city. Therefore, there is a lack of attention to the canal waterfronts by the government and by the public. Hence, this research was to find out and evaluate the factors, which will affect the quality of life of people along urban canal waterfronts. It has been discussed in terms of liveability through a series of carefully selected indicators. Liveability surveys were conducted along five canal waterfronts and the participants’ perceptions were taken. Every canal waterfront was assigned a rating of over 25 qualitative and quantitative factors (set of indicators) across six broad categories (dimensions): safety, comfort, health and wellbeing, mobility, environment, and socio-cultural factors. Each qualitative factor was given a rating from 1(tolerable)-5(intolerable). Qualitative factors were then combined with quantitative factors through a series of equations to form the liveability index. According to the proposed liveability index, transport dimension index is ideal (100), while the health and well-being dimension is the lowest (27). This will help for the creation of government policies, plans, rules and regulations and when implementing projects along urban canal waterfronts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

G, Jayanandini, Kathiravan P, and Suganthy Murugesh. "Evaluating The Urban Liveability Index With Data-Driven Insights Of Smart Cities Using Smart Innovative Solutions." In 2023 Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas: International Conference on Intelligent Systems (AICERA/ICIS). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aicera/icis59538.2023.10420047.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Roy, Bidhan Chandra, and Vikram Pawar. "Conservation discourses in technical education, India." In IABSE Congress, New Delhi 2023: Engineering for Sustainable Development. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/newdelhi.2023.0640.

Full text
Abstract:
&lt;p&gt;Heritage, both natural and cultural deserves to be treated with care and is vulnerable to neglect and apathy. Over past decades, in its quest for a ‘new India’, urban and infrastructure growth has been a-sympathetic to its built &amp;amp; natural heritage due to lack of awareness, knowledge and trained human resource.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Indian heritage has a huge potential of contributing to the liveability index and UN’s sustainable development goals. Awareness building, public mobilisation towards cultural and ecological heritage and adequately trained and skilled human resource across the country for conservation is the requirement today.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Technical education institutions sensitising of youth towards acknowledging and nurturing heritage through creation of environment for conservation learning and imparting necessary knowledge and skills need further impetus. State, Private Organisations and Corporates can provide this impetus to promote excellence in conservation discourses of technical education and to encourage and facilitate a conservation approach to urban and infrastructure development.&lt;/p&gt;
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Liveability Index' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography