Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Loblolly pine Loblolly pine Hydric soils

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Loblolly pine Loblolly pine Hydric soils'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Loblolly pine Loblolly pine Hydric soils.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Loblolly pine Loblolly pine Hydric soils"

1

South, David B. "Fomesafen: A Herbicide for Pine Seedbeds." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 21, no. 3 (August 1, 1997): 143–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/21.3.143.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Tolerance of southern pines to preemergence applications of fomesafen was examined at eight nursery experiments in 1984. When sown on coarse textured soils, loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.), slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii), longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.), and shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) were tolerant to 0.5 kg ai/ha applied after sowing. However, a reduction in loblolly pine seedling production was observed with one test on a silt loam soil in Louisiana. The risk of injury from a preemergence application may be related to soil texture. Pine tolerance to a single postemergence treatment was tested at seven nurseries in 1985. No significant injury was observed when 0.5 kg ai/ha was applied 3 to 8 weeks after sowing loblolly pine or shortleaf pine, and no injury was observed on fall-sown eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). When applied 1 or 2 months after sowing, loblolly pine appears tolerant to fomesafen even on silt loam soils. Injury has been observed from postemergence applications when a surfactant was used in combination with fomesafen. Preemergence applications of fomesafen are now an operational practice at several southern pine nurseries. South. J. Appl. For. 21(3):143-145.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Jokela, Eric J., Duncan S. Wilson, and James E. Allen. "Early Growth Responses of Slash and Loblolly Pine Following Fertilization and Herbaceous Weed Control Treatments at Establishment." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 24, no. 1 (February 1, 2000): 23–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/24.1.23.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Data from 21 regional experiments, established using a common study design, were analyzed to examine 5 and 8 yr growth responses and interactions between fertilizer and herbaceous competition control treatments applied to newly established plantations of slash (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii) and loblolly pine (P. taeda L.) in the southeastern lower Coastal Plain. Eleven experiments were with slash pine and the remaining 10 with loblolly pine. The study sites were predominantly found on CRIFF (Cooperative Research in Forest Fertilization, Univ. of Florida)A, B, C, D, and E group soils. The four treatments examined were (1) Control, no treatment; (2) Fertilizer (Fert) only, 250 lb/ac diammonium phosphate; (3) Herbaceous weed control (Herb) only, 1 quart/ac Velpar® (hexazinone) + 4 oz/ac Oust® (sulfometuron methyl); and (4) Fertilizer + Herbaceous weed control. Fifth-year survival rates for slash pine averaged 91% among all sites and were not significantly affected by silvicultural treatments or CRIFF soil groups. Loblolly pine survival rates were similarly unaffected by the Fert and Herb treatments; however, loblolly pine survival was lowest on CRIFF C group soils and most likely attributable to establishment practices rather than soil differences. The percentages of loblolly pine sites exhibiting significant volume responses at age 5 yr were 60% for Fert only, 40% for Herb only, and 100% for the Fert + Herb treatment; corresponding treatment responses for slash pine were 36%, 45%, and 64%, respectively. In the majority of tests (76%, both species), the Fert and Herb treatments were additive in nature, suggesting that each treatment was independent relative to its effects on volume growth. After 8 yr, loblolly pine volume responses for the Fert + Herb treatment over the control averaged 100% on CRIFF A group soils (1430 ft3/ac vs. 713 ft3/ac) and 52% on CRIFF C and D group soils (688 ft3/ac vs. 452 ft3/ac); corresponding treatment responses for slash pine on similar soils averaged 29% (645 ft3/ac vs. 499 ft3/ac) and 10% (805 ft3/ac vs. 733 ft3/ac), respectively. The early growth responses due to treatment declined between ages 5 and 8 yr, especially for the Herb only treatment with loblolly pine. Results from these studies suggest that growth responses were generally commensurate with management intensity, except for slash pine on sites with good inherent growth potential. Additional silvicultural inputs, in the form of midrotation fertilizer applications, would be necessary to sustain the early growth benefits afforded by the time of planting fertilizer and herbaceous weed control treatments, especially with loblolly pine on comparable sites. South. J. Appl. For. 24(1):23-30.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Cram, Michelle M., Kenneth W. Outcalt, and Stanley J. Zarnoch. "Growth of Longleaf and Loblolly Pine Planted on South Carolina Sandhill Sites." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 34, no. 2 (May 1, 2010): 79–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/34.2.79.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Performance of longleaf (Pinus palustris Mill.) and loblolly pine (P. taeda L.) were compared 15–19 years after outplanting on 10 different sites in the sandhills of South Carolina. The study was established from 1988 to 1992 with bareroot seedlings artificially inoculated with Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt) or naturally inoculated with mycorrhizae in the nursery. A containerized longleaf pine treatment with and without Pt inoculation was added to two sites in 1992. Effects of the Pt nursery treatment were mixed, with a decrease in survival of bareroot longleaf pine on two sites and an increase in survival on another site. The containerized longleaf pine treatment substantially increased survival, which led to greater volume compared with bareroot longleaf pine. Loblolly pine yielded more volume than longleaf pine on all sites but one, where survival was negatively affected by fire. Depth of sandy surface horizon affected mean annual height growth of both loblolly and longleaf pine. Height growth per year decreased with an increase in sand depth for both species. Multiple regression analysis of volume growth (ft3/ac per year) for both species indicated a strong relationship to depth of sandy soil and survival. After 15–19 years, loblolly pine has been more productive than longleaf pine, although longleaf pine productivity may be equal to or greater than that of loblolly pine on the soils with the deepest sandy surface layers over longer rotations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Moss, S. A., J. A. Burger, and W. L. Daniels. "Pitch × Loblolly Pine Growth in Organically Amended Mine Soils." Journal of Environmental Quality 18, no. 1 (January 1989): 110–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800010020x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Jain, R. K., B. G. Lockaby, and J. P. Caulfield. "Nutrition of loblolly pine on calcareous soils in Western Alabama." Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 20, no. 3-4 (February 1989): 421–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103628909368091.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Haywood, James D., and James D. Burton. "Phosphorus fertilizer, soils, and site preparation influence loblolly pine productivity." New Forests 3, no. 4 (1990): 275–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00030037.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Minogue, Patrick J., Bruce R. Zutter, and Dean H. Gjerstad. "Soil Factors and Efficacy of Hexazinone Formulations for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Release." Weed Science 36, no. 3 (May 1988): 399–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500075081.

Full text

Abstract:

Broadcast applications of hexazinone [3-cyclohexyl-6-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione] pellets and foliar sprays were tested at four rates for hardwood control and safety to loblolly pine (Pinus taedaL.) at each of eight study locations differing in soil characteristics. Reduction in the number of hardwoods in the stand (hardwood density reduction) was greater with the pellet on soils with more than 60% sand, while the liquid formulation was most efficacious for finely textured soils. Hardwood density reduction with the pellet was negatively correlated with percent silt, clay, soil organic matter, and cation exchange capacity, and positively correlated with percent sand. With foliar sprays, hardwood density reduction was positively correlated with hexazinone rate and negatively correlated with soil pH. Pine mortality was positively correlated to percent sand with the pellet and negatively correlated to soil pH with broadcast sprays. Regression models incorporating pine height, herbicide rate, soil texture, cation exchange capacity, soil organic matter, and acidity could explain up to 78% of the variation in hardwood density change and 77% of the variation in pine mortality. Selective control of hardwoods in young loblolly pine stands is a function of hexazinone rate, formulation, and various soil factors.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Hansen, Robert S., and M. Victor Bilan. "Height Growth of Loblolly and Slash Pine Plantations in the Northern Post-Oak belt of Texas." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 13, no. 1 (February 1, 1989): 5–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/13.1.5.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Age accounted for over 70% of the variation in tree height of 10- to 44-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and slash (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) plantations established on deep sands, moderate sands, and nonsandy soils in the Northern Post-Oak Belt of Texas. Climatic and edaphicfactors, relating either directly or indirectly to the amount of moisture available for tree use, explained up to 17% of height growth variation. Height growth of the plantations was comparable to that of plantations growing in the pine-mixed hardwood forest cover type of East Texas. The NorthernPost-Oak Belt of Texas is an area approximately 50 to 100 miles wide located between the pine-mixed hard-wood forest type to the east and the black-land prairie to the west. Soils within the belt belong primarily to the Alfisol or Ultisol soil orders. The western-most areas of the belt receiveup to 20% less annual rain fall than the pine-mixed hardwood type of East Texas (U.S. Environmental Data and Information Service 1949-1982). The present forest of this area is dominated by post oak (Quercus stellata Wang.), black-jack oak (Quercus Marilandica Muench.), bluejack oak (Quercusincana Bartr.), and black hickory (Carya texana Buckl.) (Ward 1984). Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) occur naturally only in scattered locations (Wilson and Hacker 1986). South. j. Appl. For. 13(1):5-8.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Lockaby, B. G., and J. P. Caulifield. "Geographic Gradients in Loblolly Pine Site Productivity and Related Environmental Factors." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 13, no. 2 (May 1, 1989): 72–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/13.2.72.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Loblolly pine site index patterns were examined along latitudinal and longitudinal ranges in Alabama. While no patterns were discernible for site index vs. longitude, parabolic relationships for site index were observed in relation to latitude. These parabolic paterns appear to be relatedto selected monthly precipitation totals that also show latitude trends. The site index vs. latitude patterns were best defined for Typic Hapludult soils with siliceous mineralogy. This productivity gradient is discussed in relation to possible mechanisms and significance for forest management.South. J. Appl. For. 13(2):72-76.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Yeiser, J. L., and J. L. Paschke. "Regenerating Wet Sites with Bare-Root and Containerized Loblolly Pine Seedlings¹." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 11, no. 1 (February 1, 1987): 52–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/11.1.52.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Seedling survival on a 1983 planted test site with a perched water table was 99% for both containerized and bare-root seedlings planted in May after the perched water table receded and 15% for seedlings planted in February while soils were saturated. Also, differences in survival forMay 1984 plantings on an upland flatwoods site, a terrace along an ephemeral stream, and a river floodplain site, indicate that each site possesses inherent properties uniquely influencing seedling survival. After the perched water table had receded, first-year mean survival of containerized seedlings was 19% higher than for bare-root seedlings. Some families showed tolerance to excessive soil moisture and are probably well suited for general planting on wet sites. The higher cost of containerized seedlings can be justified if a replant or marginal survival can be avoided. SouthJ. Appl. For. 11(1): 52-56.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Loblolly pine Loblolly pine Hydric soils"

1

Andrews, Lisa M. "Loblolly pine response to drainage and fertilization of hydric soils." Thesis, This resource online, 1993. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12162009-020152/.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Klemp, Mary Therese. "Five-year fertilizer and ground cover effects on surface-mine soils and pine growth." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44074.

Full text

Abstract:

During the last three years, 80% of mining permits in Virginia listed forestland as the post-mining land use. Adequate stocking and growth of tree stands at time of bond-release eligibility and beyond is an important beginning for returning mined lands to a productive state. In order to ensure reforestation success, biological constraints, including low mine soil fertility and competition from herbaceous ground cover, must be overcome. The effect of cultural treatments on the growth of three commercial pine species on reclaimed surface-mined land in southwestern Virginia was studied. In June, 1981, containerized seedlings of loblolly (Pinus taeda L.), Virginina (P. virginiana Mill.), and eastern white (P. strobus L.) pines were planted on a flat bench site (Site I) and a site returned to approximate original contour (Site I1). Seedlings were artificially inoculated with Pisolithus tinctorius ((Pers.) Coker and Couch), fertilized with slow-release fertilizer pellets at time of planting and broadcast with N fertilizer prior to the fourth growing season, and the ground cover around them was controlled with herbicides through the third growing season. Survival and growth of these seedlings after the first and second growing seasons were reported by Schoenholtz and Burger (1984). The response of these pines to treatments at the end of the third and fifth growing seasons were evaluated in this study. Treatment effects on foliar nutrient levels and soil properties were also examined. At the end of five years, loblolly and Virginia pines have been successfully established and are performing as well as trees in stands growing don natural soils in the southeastern U.S. Eastern white pine grows slowly the first three years and was just beginning to exhibit a response to treatment. Ground-cover control had the greatest effect on loblolly pine volume-index and elicited as much as an 86% increase in volume-index at the end of five growing seasons. Volume-index of Virginia pine was improved with ground-cover control on Site I and with fertilization on Site II. All species show an additive growth response to the combined treatments. At age five, white pine responded synergistically to combined fertilizer and ground-cover control treatments. The peak response to treatments occurred generally at age two for both loblolly and Virginia pines, while white pine response never peaked. The status of foliar and soil nutrients corroborated the importance of these cultural treatments in improving growth. Negative relationships between volume-index and foliar N and mineralizable N showed that N was not limiting pine growth at this time. Mature stands of serecia lespedeza may have supplied adequate N. A positive relationship between white pine volume-index and foliar P levels suggested that insufficient P may have limited growth of this species. As mine soils in this region age, soil P tends to be fixed by Fe-oxides present in the spoil, making competition for low levels of available-P even greater. Fertilization and ground-cover control will improve tree growth on reforested surface mines by alleviating complex interacting water and nutrient deficiencies. These treatments, implemented during establishment, were still evident at age five, a time that coincides with bond-release eligibility, and response curves suggested that response to treatments will continue as the stands develop.
Master of Science

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Neal, Andrew Wilson. "Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics Across the Hillslope-Riparian Interface in Adjacent Watersheds with Contrasting Cellulosic Biofuel Systems." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/48125.

Full text

Abstract:

Climate change resulting from emissions of fossil fuel combustion has sparked considerable interest in renewable energy and fuel production research, particularly energy derived from cellulosic ethanol, which is derived from biomass such as wood and grass. Cellulosic ethanol demonstrates a more promising future as a global energy source than corn-derived ethanol because it does not displace food crops, irrigation is not required, and chemical application rates are much lower than for annual crops, such as corn. Growing cellulosic biomass for energy can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions via carbon (C) sequestration and by reducing demand for fossil fuel production. The objective of this study was to investigate how land use change affects soil properties and selected soil C and nitrogen (N) dynamics among alternative cellulosic biofuel treatments at the Weyerhaeuser Alabama Cellulosic Biofuel Research site in west-central Alabama. Composite soils for characterization, along with forest floor, were collected at year 1 and year 2 after treatment establishment at 0-15cm and 15-30cm depths at six locations along three hillslope-riparian transects in five experimental watershed treatments. Decomposition of loblolly pine needles was assessed in each watershed using an in situ litter bag method. Seasonal in situ net nitrogen mineralization was measured using a sequential core method, and an anaerobic incubation for N mineralization potential of composite soils was performed in the laboratory. Results revealed high variability of soil properties and processes within these watersheds, along with no consistent treatment effects. This study provides baseline data for these watershed treatments for future studies.
Master of Science

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Leggett, Zakiya Holmes. "Carbon storage and transport in fertilized loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations on upland sandy and clayey soils." 2004. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-03142004-234308/unrestricted/etd.pdf.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Loblolly pine Loblolly pine Hydric soils"

1

McKee, William H. Preparing Atlantic coastal plain sites for loblolly pine plantations. Asheville, N.C: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Sword, Mary A. Local soils information needed to define the root zone in process models on the Gulf Coastal Plain. Asheville, NC: Southern Research Station, 2002.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Loblolly pine Loblolly pine Hydric soils"

1

Van Lear, D. H., P. R. Kapeluck, and Melissa M. Parker. "Distribution of Carbon in a Piedmont Soil as Affected by Loblolly Pine Management." In Carbon Forms and Functions in Forest Soils, 489–501. Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/1995.carbonforms.c22.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Richter, D. D., D. Markewitz, J. K. Dunsomb, P. R. Heine, C. G. Wells, A. Stuanes, H. L. Allen, B. Urrego, K. Harrison, and G. Bonani. "Carbon Cycling in a Loblolly Pine Forest: Implications for the Missing Carbon Sink and for the Concept of Soil." In Carbon Forms and Functions in Forest Soils, 233–51. Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/1995.carbonforms.c11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Worster, Donald. "The Nature We Have Lost." In Wealth of Nature. Oxford University Press, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092646.003.0004.

Full text

Abstract:

Nostalgia runs all through this society—fortunately, for it may be our only hope of salvation. My own version, which I probably share with a few million others, takes me back to walk in pristine natural places on this continent. I dream of traveling with our second native-born naturalist, William Bartram (his father John was the first), a slightly daft Pennsylvania Quaker who botanized from the Carolinas down into Florida in the early 1770s. I would travel with him, “seduced by ... sublime enchanting scenes of primitive nature,” through aromatic groves of magnolia, sweet gum, cabbage palmetto, loblolly pine, live oak, the roaring of alligators in our ears. I would gaze with Thomas Jefferson through his elegant white-framed windows at Monticello toward the Blue Ridge Mountains, speculating about the prodigious country stretching west. Best of all, I imagine entering that west with Lewis and Clark in 1804–5, standing beside them on Spirit Mound in present-day South Dakota, beholding, as Clark put it in his execrable spelling, “a most butifull landscape; Numerous herds of buffalow were Seen feeding in various directions; the Plain to North N. W. & N.E. extends without interuption as far as Can be seen.” And I think what it must have been like for them warping and poling up the muddy Missouri River, penetrating farther into the vast open country of the unplowed, unfenced prairies when wolves still howled in the night; of heading into “the great unknown,” panting over the unpainted, unmined, unskiied Rocky Mountains and rafting down the uncharted, undammed Columbia to the gray-green drizzly shore of the Pacific Ocean. How much has been lost in our short years as a nation, how much have we to be nostalgic about. In the beginning of white discovery North America must have been a glorious place, brimming with exquisite wild beauty, offering to agriculturists some of the earth's richest soils, incredible stands of trees, booty on booty of mineral wealth. Think for a moment of the infinitude of animals that once teemed but are now diminished or gone. In the most comprehensive, detailed analysis yet offered, Frank Gilbert Roe estimated that forty million bison roamed the continent as late as 1830.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!