To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Logical argumentation.

Journal articles on the topic 'Logical argumentation'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Logical argumentation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Nariţa, Ionel. "Argumentation Moods." Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio 7, no. 1 (2020): 107–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/auscom-2020-0008.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Argumentation is an act of communication performed by a speaker aiming to persuade a listener to accept or reject a proposition, named thesis, using another proposition, called argument, and a relation between them – the frame of argumentation. Argumentations are evaluated relatively to the pragmatic value of success and to the logical value of correctness. These values are independent of each other – namely, from the success of an argumentation, nothing can be inferred about its correctitude, and reciprocally. In order to establish the correctness of an argumentation, we can classify
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Jo, Yohan, Seojin Bang, Chris Reed, and Eduard Hovy. "Classifying Argumentative Relations Using Logical Mechanisms and Argumentation Schemes." Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 9 (2021): 721–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00394.

Full text
Abstract:
While argument mining has achieved significant success in classifying argumentative relations between statements (support, attack, and neutral), we have a limited computational understanding of logical mechanisms that constitute those relations. Most recent studies rely on black-box models, which are not as linguistically insightful as desired. On the other hand, earlier studies use rather simple lexical features, missing logical relations between statements. To overcome these limitations, our work classifies argumentative relations based on four logical and theory-informed mechanisms between
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Arieli, Ofer, and Christian Straßer. "Sequent-based logical argumentation." Argument & Computation 6, no. 1 (2015): 73–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2014.1002536.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Correia, Vasco. "The Ethics of Argumentation." Informal Logic 32, no. 2 (2012): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v32i2.3530.

Full text
Abstract:
Normative theories of argumentation tend to assume that logical and dialectical rules suffice to ensure the rationality of argumentative discourse. Yet, in everyday debates people use arguments that seem valid in light of such rules but nonetheless biased and tendentious. This article seeks to show that the rationality of argumentation can only be fully promoted if we take into account its ethical dimension. To substantiate this claim, I review some of the empirical evidence indicating that people’s inferential reasoning is systematically affected by a variety of biases and heuristics. Insofar
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Iskandar, Zelvi. "Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Terhadap Keterampilan Menulis Argumentasi (Studi Eksperimen Pada Siswa Kelas Xi Sma Negeri 1 Lengayang)." ESTETIK : Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2018): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/estetik.v1i1.416.

Full text
Abstract:
The study is intendead to investigate the achievement of language skill of student’s who learn through cooperative learning strategy and those who learn through individual learning one. It is a qualitative research by employing experiment methode which includes two sampel of group, namely ones who follow cooperative learning strategy. Based on the findings and the investigation, it reaches the following conclusion. Firstly, teachers can choose which learning materials and strategies should be used to gain the increasment of student’s skill writing argumentation as when the level of rational th
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Longaker, Mark Garrett. "John Locke on Inference and Fallacy, A Re-Appraisal." Informal Logic 34, no. 4 (2014): 364. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v34i4.4133.

Full text
Abstract:
John Locke, long associated with the “standard” approach to fallacies and the “logical” approach to valid inference, had both logical and dialectical reasons for favoring certain proofs and denigrating others. While the logical approach to argumentation stands forth in Locke’s philosophical writings (such as the Essay Concerning Human Understanding), a dialectical approach can be found in his contributions to public controversies regarding religion and toleration. Understanding Locke’s dialectical approach to argumentation not only makes his work more relevant to the contemporary discipline of
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Arieli, Ofer, and Christian Straßer. "Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems." Theoretical Computer Science 781 (August 2019): 63–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.02.019.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Schumann, Andrew. "Logical Cornestones of Judaic Argumentation Theory." Argumentation 27, no. 3 (2012): 305–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-012-9273-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Leite, João, Tran Cao Son, Paolo Torroni, and Stefan Woltran. "Applications of logical approaches to argumentation." Argument & Computation 6, no. 1 (2015): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2014.1003407.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Amgoud, Leila, and Philippe Besnard. "Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks." Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 23, no. 3 (2013): 229–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2013.830381.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Caminada, Martin W. A., and Dov M. Gabbay. "A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation." Studia Logica 93, no. 2-3 (2009): 109–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-009-9218-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Amgoud, Leila, and Henri Prade. "Can AI Models Capture Natural Language Argumentation?" International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence 6, no. 3 (2012): 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2012070102.

Full text
Abstract:
Formal AI models of argumentation define arguments as reasons that support claims (which may be beliefs, decisions, actions, etc.). Such arguments may be attacked by other arguments. The main issue is then to identify the accepted ones. Several semantics were thus proposed for evaluating the arguments. Works in linguistics focus mainly on understanding the notion of argument, identifying its types, and describing different forms of counter-argumentation. This paper advocates that such typologies are instrumental for capturing real argumentations. It shows that some of the forms cannot be handl
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

KREMMYDAS, CHRISTOS. "2. LOGICAL ARGUMENTATION IN DEMOSTHENES AGAINST LEPTINES." Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 50, Supplement_96 (2007): 19–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.2007.tb02481.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Gabbay, Dov M., and Artur S. d’Avila Garcez. "Logical Modes of Attack in Argumentation Networks." Studia Logica 93, no. 2-3 (2009): 199–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-009-9216-z.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Kattakulovna, Turabova Sevara. "The Importance Of The Discussion Method In The Development Of Argumentative Competence In Students." American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations 2, no. 09 (2020): 442–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume02issue09-68.

Full text
Abstract:
This article discusses the importance of using debate as a teaching method in mastering key technologies to improve students’ argumentative competence. At the same time, the ability to argue constructively is interpreted as the ability to perform various argumentative actions to substantiate or refute certain points of view. The article presents the characteristics of argumentative skills, as well as the conditions for the formation of logical and psychological components of debate, which is one of the specific manifestations of argumentation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Novak, Marko. "Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law." Bratislava Law Review 5, no. 1 (2021): 91–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.46282/blr.2021.5.1.187.

Full text
Abstract:
Although the legal context is a formalized framework, in judicial proceedings there is also room for multi-modal argumentation. To the traditional logical mode, multi-modal argumentation theory has added three additional modes (the so-called “alternate” modes: visceral, kisceral, and emotional). They complement the logical mode in unclear legal cases, those with vague and ambiguous premises (both legal and factual). What is discussed here is visual argumentation as part of the visceral mode. Visual arguments can be appropriate in legal argumentation as evidence used to determine the lower prem
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Dung, P. M., and P. M. Thang. "Closure and Consistency In Logic-Associated Argumentation." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 49 (January 29, 2014): 79–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1613/jair.4107.

Full text
Abstract:
Properties like logical closure and consistency are important properties in any logical reasoning system. Caminada and Amgoud showed that not every logic-based argument system satisfies these relevant properties. But under conditions like closure under contraposition or transposition of the monotonic part of the underlying logic, ASPIC-like systems satisfy these properties. In contrast, the logical closure and consistency properties are not well-understood for other well-known and widely applied systems like logic programming or assumption based argumentation. Though conditions like closure un
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Macagno, Fabrizio. "Esquemas de argumentação para a interpretação da lei." Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea 3, no. 2 (2019): 73–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.21875/tjc.v3i2.22710.

Full text
Abstract:
RESUMO:Neste artigo demonstra-se como os esquemas argumentativos (esquemas que representam argumentos refutáveis, combinados com perguntas críticas correspondentes), podem ser usados para representar a estrutura lógica dos vários tipos de argumentos reconhecidos como fundamentais na interpretação da lei por Tarello (1980). Defende-se que o processo de interpretação da lei tem uma estrutura argumentativa distinta na qual a conclusão, nomeadamente o significado disputável ou questionado atribuído a uma fonte jurídica, é uma afirmação que necessita ser respaldada por argumentos refutáveis a favor
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Ireneous Nakpih, Callistus, and Simone Santini. "Automated Discovery of Logical Fallacies in Legal Argumentation." International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications 11, no. 2 (2020): 37–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5121/ijaia.2020.11203.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Eva, Benjamin, and Stephan Hartmann. "Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity." Psychological Review 125, no. 5 (2018): 806–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000114.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Tindale, Christopher W. "Out of the Space of Reasons." Pragmatics and Cognition 19, no. 3 (2011): 383–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.3.01tin.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper investigates the ‘logical space of reasons’ as a social space in which rational agents operate and persons in an important sense come to be. Building from an investigation of argumentative agents in Aristotle’s Rhetoric, I discuss both interior and exterior criteria for personhood and propose that the latter shows how argumentation, as a principal activity of the space of reasons, results in the particular kinds of persons we recognize there as rational agents. The overall analysis is indebted to Robert Brandom’s centralizing of the practice of giving and receiving reasons and the su
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Cayrol, Claudette, and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. "Logical Encoding of Argumentation Frameworks with Higher-order Attacks and Evidential Supports." International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 29, no. 03n04 (2020): 2060003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218213020600039.

Full text
Abstract:
We propose a logical encoding of argumentation frameworks with higher-order interactions (i.e. attacks/supports whose targets are arguments or other attacks/supports) with an evidential meaning for supports. Our purpose is to separate the logical expression of the meaning of an attack or an evidential support (simple or higher-order) from the logical expression of acceptability semantics. We consider semantics which specify the conditions under which the arguments (resp. the attacks/supports) are considered as accepted, directly on the extended framework, without translating the original frame
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

OSORIO, MAURICIO, and JUAN CARLOS NIEVES. "Range-based argumentation semantics as two-valued models." Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 17, no. 1 (2016): 75–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1471068416000090.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractCharacterizations of semi-stable and stage extensions in terms of two-valued logical models are presented. To this end, the so-called GL-supported and GL-stage models are defined. These two classes of logical models are logic programming counterparts of the notion of range which is an established concept in argumentation semantics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Barebina, Natalia, Galina Kostyushkina, and Zhiyong Fang. "Vectors of Argumentative Orientation in the Study of Language Aspects Dynamic of Political Media Discourse." Bulletin of Baikal State University 31, no. 1 (2021): 98–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2500-2759.2021.31(1).98-102.

Full text
Abstract:
The article presents an attempt to analyze the argumentative constants and variations in the analytical genre of a political media discourse from the point of view of focusing on the formation of different opinions of the audience. This task is solved by using the concept of strategic maneuvering. This concept contains a theoretical tool that allows you to identify violations of dialectical standards of argumentation in the form of rhetorical goals in the author's reasoning. Using the method of random selection, a corpus of examples was formed as fragments of speeches of political leaders. Exa
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Kim, Igor E., and Daria I. Ilina. "Linguistic Personality of the Author of Popular Science Articles in Terms of Argumentation." Philology 19, no. 9 (2020): 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-9-19-30.

Full text
Abstract:
The article examines the linguistic personality of the author of popular science articles through analysis of his use of argumentative means. Three articles of the journalist R. Fishman were selected as material. The distribution of argumentative schemes (types of arguments) is considered in comparison with the average distribution in journalistic texts; some specific features of argumentative structures (ways of organizing argumentation in the text) are shown. It was found that the author often prefers to use logical and pseudological arguments, as well as arguments demonstrating ways of obta
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Kim, Igor E., and Daria I. Ilina. "Linguistic Personality of the Author of Popular Science Articles in Terms of Argumentation." Philology 19, no. 9 (2020): 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-9-19-30.

Full text
Abstract:
The article examines the linguistic personality of the author of popular science articles through analysis of his use of argumentative means. Three articles of the journalist R. Fishman were selected as material. The distribution of argumentative schemes (types of arguments) is considered in comparison with the average distribution in journalistic texts; some specific features of argumentative structures (ways of organizing argumentation in the text) are shown. It was found that the author often prefers to use logical and pseudological arguments, as well as arguments demonstrating ways of obta
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Song, Yi, and Jesse R. Sparks. "Measuring Argumentation Skills Through a Game-Enhanced Scenario-Based Assessment." Journal of Educational Computing Research 56, no. 8 (2017): 1324–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633117740605.

Full text
Abstract:
This project aimed to develop an engaging formative assessment that simulates the social and dialogic processes that are often missing in traditional instruction and assessment of argumentation. In this article, we describe the design of an argumentative reasoning task within a scenario-based assessment enhanced with game elements ( Seaball—Semester at Sea). This Seaball task requires students to classify foods as “junk food” or not, by identifying relevant evidence to support their decisions and evaluating reasoning errors in others’ arguments. Data from a small-scale study of 42 middle schoo
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Watson, Barbara. "The Psychosocial Courtroom: Towards a New Theory of Argumentation." Canadian journal of law and society 11, no. 1 (1996): 99–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0829320100004609.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis paper argues for a psychosocial theory of courtroom argumentation. Its central thesis is the deconstruction of the deceptive shifts of courtroom dynamics between the veneer of logical propriety and the emotional prescription buried below. Selected observations on the androcentric bias of the sciences, on linguistic convention as gendered historical ambition, and on alternatives to the dominant logical mode of reasoning and argumentation constitute Part I. Part II critically analyzes selected cases for courtroom alternatives. In an effort to reclaim non-linguistic discourse, Part I
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Kozlova, E. A. "THE LOGICAL PRESUPPOSITIONS IN THE PRAGMATIC ASPECT OF ARGUMENTATION." Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, no. 3 (2019): 135–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2019-3-135-140.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Kraus, Sarit, Katia Sycara, and Amir Evenchik. "Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation." Artificial Intelligence 104, no. 1-2 (1998): 1–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00078-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

kervin, Denise. "Advertising and Persuasion: From Logical Argumentation to Seductive Ambiguity." Journal of Visual Literacy 10, no. 2 (1990): 8–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23796529.1990.11674453.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Kubinjec, Janko. "Modality of judgments on justice." Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine 79, no. 9 (2007): 287–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/gakv0709287k.

Full text
Abstract:
Definition of the concept of justice comes from apodictic judgments, while definition of its individual validity comes from assertoric judgments. Argumentation as an element of justice in a logical sense is an assertoric judgment. Its definition brings light to the search for the logical nature of assertoric judgment - it is a contribution the philosophy of law may offer to the logic. In the argumentation assertoric judgment does not transform to problematic judgment and for this reason the justice can never be arbitrary.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Moshavi, Adina. "Between Dialectic and Rhetoric: Rhetorical Questions Expressing Premises in Biblical Prose Argumentation." Vetus Testamentum 65, no. 1 (2015): 136–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12341182.

Full text
Abstract:
Rhetorical questions expressing premises are situated at the intersection of two disciplines whose object of study is argumentation: dialectic and rhetoric. This paper examines arguments in biblical prose whose premises take the form of rhetorical questions, utilizing insights from modern dialectical and rhetorical theories of argumentation. The corpus for this study is the prose portions of Genesis-2 Kings. The nearly 130 arguments in the corpus were found to exhibit clear logical structures after undergoing reconstruction, although these structures are not necessarily deductively valid. In t
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

De Neys, Wim. "The freak in all of us: Logical truth seeking without argumentation." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34, no. 2 (2011): 75–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10002827.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractMercier and Sperber (M&S) sketch a bleak picture of logical reasoning in classic, nonargumentative tasks. I argue that recent processing data indicate that despite people's poor performance they at least seek to adhere to traditional logical norms in these tasks. This implies that classic reasoning tasks are less artificial–and logical reasoning less exceptional–than M&S's framework suggests.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Schumann, Andrew. "Legal argumentation in Mesopotamia since Ur III." Journal of Argumentation in Context 9, no. 2 (2020): 243–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.19015.sch.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In this paper, I show that we can find some foundations of logic and legal argumentation in the tablets of Mesopotamia at least since the dynasty of Ur III. In these texts, we see the oldest correct application of logical inference rules (e.g. modus ponens). As concerns the legal argumentation established in Mesopotamia, we can reconstruct on the basis of the tablets the following rules of dispute resolutions during trials: (1) There are two parties of disputants: (i) a protagonist who formulates a standpoint and (ii) an antagonist who disagrees with the protagonist’s standpoint and f
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Szczęk, Joanna. "Wir haben uns für einen anderen Kandidaten entschieden. – Zu den Argumentationsmustern in den deutschen Absageschreiben auf Bewerbungen." Studia Germanica Posnaniensia, no. 39 (April 26, 2019): 167–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/sgp.2018.39.11.

Full text
Abstract:
The subject of this analysis are German job application refusal letters, in which a number of structural elements can be distinguished. One of them is argumentation or justification. This text studies logical argumentation strategies and its objective is to create a typology of justifications in job application refusal letters.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Novak, Marko. "Rooting Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation in Jung, and Its Extension to Law." Informal Logic 40, no. 3 (2020): 383–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v40i30.6002.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper discusses how an understanding of Jung's psychological types is important for the relevance of Gilbert's multi-modal argumentation theory. Moreover, it highlights how the types have been confirmed by contemporary neuroscience and cognitive psychology. Based on Gilbert's approach, I extend multi-modal argumentation to the area of legal argumentation. It seems that when we leave behind the traditional fortress of “logical” legal argumentation, we "discover" alternate modes (such as the intuitive, emotional, and sensory) that have always been present, concealed in the theoretically und
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Bregant, Janez. "CRITICAL THINKING IN EDUCATION: WHY TO AVOID LOGICAL FALLACIES?" Problems of Education in the 21st Century 61, no. 1 (2014): 18–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/14.61.18.

Full text
Abstract:
The study argues for the claim that a correct argumentation, i.e. a non-fallacious or good reasoning, should be the essential part of the education process, which is not always the case. The bad argumentation makes human standards and interpersonal relationships worse, and leads to the growth of social conflicts and an instable society. If the legislature, executive and judiciary branches of power did not listen to good arguments, our lives would not be as good as they are since the state might pass bad, dangerous and unjust laws. A person trained in critical thinking starting in their youth w
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Zhang, Ying. "An Investigation into the Development of Structure and Evidence Use in Argumentative Writing." Theory and Practice in Language Studies 8, no. 11 (2018): 1441. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0811.08.

Full text
Abstract:
This study aims to investigate EFL learners’ argumentative writing based on structural elements in Toulmin model (1953, 2008). It also explores the overall use of evidence in supporting claims. It was found that claim and data were the basic structural elements used by Chinese EFL learners in constructing argumentative writing. The respective use of counterargument data and rebuttal was significantly correlated with the quality of argumentation. In argumentative reasoning, the types of evidence and the number of evidence used by participants were very limited. Logical analysis was found to be
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Кремер and Inessa Kremer. "The communicative aspect of the process of argumentation in the German critical text." Modern Communication Studies 2, no. 5 (2013): 53–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1252.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper dwells upon the communicative aspect of the process of argumentation
 in critical texts, written in German. It reveals argumentative strategies
 in the interpretation of the scientific critical text from the point of view
 of communicative-cognitive paradigm. The object of the analysis is scientific
 (research) critical reviews from German journals, communicative intentions
 of which are information, assessing, its explanation and influence upon the
 reader. In the framework of the informational potential the author investigates
 the process of juxt
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Hundleby, Catherine. "Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries." Informal Logic 33, no. 2 (2013): 238. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v33i2.3895.

Full text
Abstract:
Trudy Govier argues in The Philosophy of Argument that adversariality in argumentation can be kept to a necessary minimum. On her ac-count, politeness can limit the ancillary adversariality of hostile culture but a degree of logical opposition will remain part of argumentation, and perhaps all reasoning. Argumentation cannot be purified by politeness in the way she hopes, nor does reasoning even in the discursive context of argumentation demand opposition. Such hopes assume an idealized politeness free from gender, and reasoners with inhuman or at least highly privileged capabilities and no ne
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Mirzakhanyan, Ruben K., Srbuhi R. Gevorgyan, Vladimir S. Karapetyan, A. M. Dallakyan, and Asya S. Berberyan. "Typical Expression Of Cognitive Dissonance And Consonance In The Course Of Argumentation Among Primary-School Children Playing Chess." WISDOM 13, no. 2 (2019): 75–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v13i2.281.

Full text
Abstract:
The research aims to reveal the typical expressions of cognitive dissonance and consonance among the primary-school children by their argumentations upon their deed. The relevance of the research stems from the applicability of the study of the phenomena of dissonance and consonance, which inherently emerge in the sphere of argumentation among the children who study how to play chess. Cognitive dissonance and consonance in the sphere of argumentation in the course of the game of chess are gradually transforming both into the respective reference points – relevant to the situation given, and in
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Besnard, Philippe, Claudette Cayrol, and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. "Logical theories and abstract argumentation: A survey of existing works." Argument & Computation 11, no. 1-2 (2020): 41–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/aac-190476.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Gabbay, D. M. "Logical foundations for bipolar and tripolar argumentation networks: preliminary results." Journal of Logic and Computation 26, no. 1 (2013): 247–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/logcom/ext027.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Corsi, Esther Anna, and Christian G. Fermüller. "Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles." Soft Computing 23, no. 7 (2018): 2255–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3513-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Garcia, Roberta Veloso, Juliana Marques Cianni dos Santos, and Estaner Claro Romão. "The use of Wittgenstein's language games to promote argumentation in children at the beginning of scientific literacy." International Journal for Innovation Education and Research 9, no. 7 (2021): 84–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss7.3222.

Full text
Abstract:
The insertion of the individual in the scientific culture goes through scientific literacy and this, through teaching that privileges research and argumentation in the school scenario, mainly in Science classes. Based on indicators found in the literature that point to scientific literacy and models proposed by Lawson to define the structure of the argument, a table was elaborated to relate the argumentation of children in the second year of elementary school, leveling it in five levels that point to the logical reasoning and the dominion of content, taking into account Wittgenstein's linguist
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Кремер and Inessa Kremer. "Argumentation Representatives in German Scientific Text." Modern Communication Studies 3, no. 1 (2014): 42–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2450.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper deals with the study related to linguistic representation of argumentation in German scientific text. The structure of argumentation in scientific reviews from German journals «Lebende Sprachen», «Muttersprache», «Zeitschrift fr Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung », «Zielsprache Deutsch», which are the objects of study, has been presented in this paper. Argumentation in a scientific critical text is not just a logical procedure but also a kind of activity performed by a reviewer. Argumentation demonstrates an evaluative reasoning, where reasonable and emotional
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Myronenko, Ruslan. "Reconstruction of the Stagirite argument against the fatalism of future events." Multiversum. Philosophical almanac 2, no. 2 (2020): 32–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2020.2.2.03.

Full text
Abstract:
The question of free will and determinism is one of the most discussed in analytic philosophy. This is because interdisciplinary research has entered the field of studying the brain and consciousness – and often, consciousness is presented as an invention, an epiphenomenon. One of the attributes of consciousness is free will. The prehistory of modern research in the field of free will is the discussion about the need for future events, which was first analyzed by Stagirite in chapter 9, "On Interpretation". Despite all the analyticity and consistency of Aristotle's works, this work is full of
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Kakas, Antonis. "Informalizing Formal Logic." Informal Logic 39, no. 2 (2019): 169–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v39i2.5169.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper presents a way in which formal logic can be understood and reformulated in terms of argumentation that can help us unify formal and informal reasoning. Classical deductive reasoning will be expressed entirely in terms of notions and concepts from argumentation so that formal logical entailment is equivalently captured via the arguments that win between those supporting concluding formulae and arguments supporting contradictory formulae. This allows us to go beyond Classical Logic and smoothly connect it with human reasoning, thus providing a uniform argumentation-based view of both
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Gascón, José Ángel. "Arguing as a Virtuous Arguer Would Argue." Informal Logic 35, no. 4 (2015): 467. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v35i4.4332.

Full text
Abstract:
A virtue approach to argumentation would focus on the arguers’ character rather than the arguments. Therefore, it must be explained how good arguments relate to virtuous arguers. This article focus on this issue and attempts to provide an answer to the question: Could a bad arguer produce a good argument? It is argued that, besides the usual logical, dialectical, and rhetorical standards, a virtuously produced good argument must meet two additional requirements: the arguer must be in a specific state of mind, and the argument must be broadly conceived of as an argumentative interaction and thus
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!