Academic literature on the topic 'Magritte'

Etude de l'evolution des idees de rene magritte (1898-1967) sur les mots et les images qui comporte quatre parties : "genese d'un peintre", "sous lesigne des mots et des images", "pensee image", "poetiqsue de l'art de magritte". Evolution vers l'alliance des mots et des images pour rendre visible la veritable "pensee" inspiree qui tend a aboutir la conception magrittienne du "veritable art de peindre" : c'est une poesie "visible". L'art de magritte vise a "obliger" la pensee, a "penser" ("voir") et a devenir libre a travers les images liberees. Cette peinture est le "signe materiel de la liberte de la pensee". En ce sens, elle a le meme but que le langage verbal, elle sert de moyen de penser. C'est la plus remarquable analogie entre ecriture et peinture magrittienne. La recherche de la pensee poetique conduit l'artiste, chercheur du "mystere" du monde, a la revelation de la pensee comme un mystere absolu. Ainsi l'evocation du mystere devient la finalite de son art des mots et des images qui s'incarne dans le tableau les deux mysteres (1966)<br>A study rene magritte, writing painging on the evolution of rene magritte's (1898-1967) ideas about words and images composed of four parts : "genesis of a painter", "under the sign of the words and the images", "thaught image", "poetry of magritte's art". Evolution towords the combination of words and images to makes visible the true inspirated poetic thaught which tend to end in magrittian conception of "real art of painting", that is a visible poetry. Magritte's art pursue to oblige the thaught, "prisoner", to "think" ("see") and to make free throwout the liberated images. This painting is the material sign of the liberty of the thaught. In this way, it has the same goal as the verbal langage, it is used as a mean pf think. This the most remarkable analogy bethween writing and magritt's painting which trys to be poetic. The research of the poetic thaught lead the artist to the reveal of the thaught as a absolut mystery which becomes incarnate in the picture the two mysteries (1966). That is the materialisation of magritte's pictorial and mental univers who was researcher of the mystery of the world and the life

Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Comunicação e Expressão, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Literatura, Florianópolis, 2017.<br>Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-23T03:17:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 349628.pdf: 1492625 bytes, checksum: 3035035f66f3a240e0dc79bf8190ecf1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017<br>Essa dissertação é uma proposta de leitura comparada de Julio Cortázar e René Magritte. Para realizar essa análise, foram destacados, principalmente, os contos de Cortázar ?Circe? publicado em Bestiário, de 1951, e ?Axolote?, publicado em Final de Jogo, de 1956. As obras de Magritte selecionadas foram L´invention collective, de 1934, Le mal du pays (1940) e La bataille de l´Argonne (1964). O objetivo da dissertação é realizar uma leitura que ressalte a proximidade teórica e a intertextualidade entre os dois autores, que tinham raízes no surrealismo e exploraram temas relacionados ao mito.<br>Abstract : This dissertation is a comparative reading proposal of Julio Cortázar and René Magritte. To carry out this analysis, the short stories of Cortázar "Circe" published in Bestiário (1951) and "Axolote", published in Final of Game (1956) were highlighted. The works of Magritte selected were ?L'invention collective?, 1934, ?Le mal du pays? (1940), and ?La bataille de l'Argonne? (1964). The objective of the dissertation is to carry out a reading that emphasizes the theoretical proximity and the intertextuality between the two authors, who had roots in the surrealism and explored subjects related to the myth.

Cet ouvrage examine les oeuvres de René Magritte datant de 1925 à 1933. L’auteur considère les oeuvres crées au cours de ces années comme appartenant à deux moments distincts d’un même cheminement critique des relations marchandes. Le premier moment est situé de 1925 à 1927, le second en 1933, au seuil de la découverte d’un processus de formation d’images appelé "objet- réponse". Ces deux périodes sont considérées comme étant basées sur des modes de construction opposés. Les oeuvres datant de la première période sont perçues comme étant le résultat d’une volonté de nier les principes structurels de l’oeuvre "organique". Les oeuvres construites d’après le modèle de T objet- réponse sont, quant à elles, interprétées en tant que tentative de transcender les limites strictement quantitatives et rationelles imposées à tout objet par les rapports marchands. Cette poursuite vers un dépassement de la valeur d’échange s’établit grâce à la construction de liens et d’images qui débordent toutes considérations pratiques.<br>This essay examines René Magritte’s works from 1925 to 1933. It posits that Magritte’s paintings underwent two distinct stages of resistance to commodity relations, one around 1925-1927, the other starting in 1933 with the development of a work process known as objet-réponse. It suggests that the two stages of resistance to commodity relations were founded on opposite modes of construction. The works dating from the early years are understood as being the result of a constant effort to negate the structural principles of the 'organic’ work of art, while the works dating from 1933, are understood as aiming for the creation of a new value system, one which transcends the rational and quantitative norms imposed by reified society.<br>Montréal Trigonix inc. 2018

C'est en procédant à une analyse de l'interaction entre l'écriture et l'image dans les œuvres de Joan Miró et de René Magritte que ce travail de mise en contraste cherche à vérifier quel est le rôle joué par l'écriture dans la création picturale - vérifier comment le langage écrit influence, interfère et/ou s'incorpore dans la genèse de l'œuvre d'art. Le texte est structuré autour de quatre axes centraux d'analyse, chacun comportant son propre fondement théorique et méthodologique. Le premier axe examine les fondements du modus operandi des deux artistes, et vise à mettre en valeur l'importance que la poésie a eue dans leur construction. Le deuxième confronte les deux artistes sans les comparer et pose la question de l'interaction entre le texte et l'image dans leurs œuvres picturales respectives (titres de tableaux, narration en peinture, influences littéraires, illustration) - et de même dans leur production littéraire, en prenant comme objet leurs poèmes et proses, ainsi que les aphorismes de Magritte. Les deux axes suivants explorent le rôle de l'écriture dans la création picturale des deux artistes au travers du prisme de la critique génétique. Le troisième étudie le processus de création de Magritte en prenant comme objet d'étude sa correspondance, laquelle conserverait la trace d'une documentation disparue. Dans le quatrième axe, les carnets de travail et les dessins préparatoires de Miró servent de base à une réflexion qui vise à dégager les principales fonctions que l'écriture occupe à l'intérieur du processus de création d'une peinture. C'est donc à la lumière de l'écriture que ce travail cherche à comprendre la création picturale de Miró et de Magritte<br>The present work has as its main objective to verify the role of writing in pictorial creation - to verify how written language may influence, interfere with and/or incorporate itself into the genesis of an artwork. It does so by carrying out a contrastive analysis of the interaction of text and image in the works of Joan Miró and René Magritte. The research rests upon four main axes of analysis, each one having its own methodology and its own theoretical approach. The first axis examines the founding principles of the artists' modus operandi, in an attempt to bring forth evidence of the important role played by poetry in the construction of such principles. The second axis places the two artists side by side in order to analyze a certain number of aesthetic instances where text and image interact with one another, first in their graphic and plastic work (titles, narrative, literary influences, illustration), and then in their literary work (their poetry and prose, as well as Magritte's aphorisms). The third and fourth axes of analysis explore the question of the role of writing in pictorial creation from the perspective of genetic criticism. The third axis tries to bring an understanding of Magritte's creative process through the traces that can be found in his correspondence. The fourth and last axis of analysis searches for the main operative functions of writing in the notebooks and the preliminary drawings of Miró, in order to see how writing can play a role in the creation of an image. It is thus through writing that this work aims to bring an understanding of the pictorial creation of Miró and Magritte

Cette thèse se propose d’analyser les différents aspects de l'art de R. Magritte dans son interdisciplinarité. Le premier chapitre prend comme point de départ le versant philosophique et linguistique que l’on peut remarquer dans son œuvre, pour analyser de façon détaillée les aspects mimétiques et sémiotiques. L'utilisation que fait Magritte de certaines formes de la rhétorique rend évidente l'importance de l'aspect graphémique du mot, gouverné par le visible. La coïncidence entre les deux contraires (sémiosis et mimesis) laisse percevoir l'espace qui les sépare. D'un point de vue comparatiste, cet entrelacs permet d’établir des rapports entre certaines œuvres littéraires (de Baudelaire et de Mallarmé, notamment) et des titres ou des représentations dans les œuvres de Magritte. Les mots deviennent des images et le rôle de la mémoire et du rêve trouve un écho dans la pensée de R. Caillois. L'artiste place le passé, le présent et le futur dans un réseau qui peut être mis en parallèle avec l'Atlas de Warburg. Dans cette mosaïque, le geste d’écrire et celui de peindre s’entrelacent, de telle sorte que, chez Magritte, la distinction entre les deux actions s’efface dans la libre association du visible, qui acquiert ainsi un sens nouveau. Cette négation et cet écart se fondent en un seul contenant qui, d’un côté, exalte la différence mais qui, de l’autre, se construit à partir de sa propre appartenance. Certaines créations de R. Magritte dans le domaine de l'illustration ou de la production filmique le révèlent. On assiste à la décomposition et à la recomposition, par le biais de l'humour, de réalités distantes entre elles, ce qui laisse entrevoir la frange minime de l’écart<br>This thesis aims at analyzing Magritte’s multifarious artistry in the light of its interdisciplinarity. The first chapter starts from the philosophical and linguistic côté that can be found in his work in order to deeply explore its figurative and semiotic aspects. The use of rhetorical forms in Magritte clearly shows the importance of the graphemic character of the word, dominated by the mimetic sign. The encounter, or rather the coincidence, between the two opposites (mimesis and semiosis) discloses the space that separates them: the nowhere we tried to define through various instruments. From a comparative point of view, this space of separation shows various literary ties (especially with Baudelaire and Mallarmé) inherent in the titles and in the representations of Magritte work. The words become images and the role of memory and dream attuned to the thought of R. Caillois. The artist constructs a network with the past, the present and the future, which suggests a parallelism with Warburg’s Atlas. In this mosaic, the gesture of writing mixes with the painting; similarly in Magritte the distinction between the two actions is cancelled through the free re-signified association of the visible.The painter destroys and builds at the same time, superimposing appearances, so to move away from a faithful description of reality. This rejection produces a gap in which the content of words and images fuses into a single element: page–canvas–screen. This is what some of Magritte’s creations reveal in their illustrative and film transposition, in which we see the assembling and disassembling of distant realities through the use of humor that reveals their thin divide<br>Questa tesi si propone di analizzare i molteplici punti di vista di Magritte alla luce della sua interdisciplinarità. Il primo capitolo si basa sul côté filosofico e linguistico rintracciabile nella sua opera, per esplorarne nel dettaglio l’aspetto figurativo e semiotico. L’utilizzo delle forme retoriche in Magritte mostra con evidenza l’importanza del carattere grafemico della parola, sovrastato dal segno mimetico. L’incontro, o meglio la coincidenza, tra i due contrari (semiosis e mimesis) lascia apparire lo spazio che li separa: il non luogo a cui abbiamo cercato di dare una definizione. Da un punto di vista comparatista questo scarto mostra vari legami letterari (soprattutto con Baudelaire e Mallarmé) insiti nei titoli e nelle rappresentazioni delle produzioni magrittiane. Le parole diventano immagini e il ruolo della memoria e del sogno trova un raccordo con il pensiero di R. Caillois. L’artista costruisce una rete con il passato, il presente e il futuro, che fa pensare a un parallelo con l’Atlas warburghiano. In questo mosaico il gesto di scrivere si mescola a quello di dipingere, cosicché in Magritte la distinzione tra le due azioni si annulla nella libera associazione risimbolizzata del visibile. Il pittore distrugge e costruisce al contempo, sovrapponendo le apparenze, in modo da annullare la mimesis stessa, nel senso di descrizione fedele della realtà. La negazione e lo scarto sorgono dalla loro fusione in un unico contenitore, che da una parte esalta la differenza ma che dall’altra vi costruisce sopra la propria appartenenza. È ciò che certe creazioni magrittiane rivelano in ambito illustrativo o filmico, dove assistiamo alla decomposizione e poi alla ricomposizione delle realtà distanti attraverso l’humour, che lascia intravedere lo spessore sottile di separazione

Orientador : Joaquim Brasil Fontes<br>Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação<br>Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-28T00:21:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Linardi_AnaBeatriz_M.pdf: 39958102 bytes, checksum: 2bd51290db8cec4da6c1012120be4514 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001<br>Mestrado

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:29:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2010-02-26Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:20:12Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 rodrigues_apd_me_sjrp.pdf: 957510 bytes, checksum: 55e3937d74fcb290d6d51e27de575279 (MD5)<br>Considerando a evolução nos campos da produção artística e do próprio exercício crítico, o presente trabalho consiste em uma análise comparativa entre três contos da escritora brasileira Lygia Fagundes Telles e três telas do pintor belga René Magritte. Essa análise demonstra, a partir do conceito de homologia estrutural desenvolvido por Aguinaldo José Gonçalves, as correspondências estruturais e procedimentais entre Pintura e Literatura e, também, suas especificidades enquanto obras de códigos diferentes. O modo como cada obra, texto ou tela, trabalha a relação entre arte e realidade foi o fio condutor do processo analítico que também procurou demonstrar como a questão da representação é central na composição tanto dos contos como das pinturas. Assim, o trabalho não apenas reflete sobre as especificidades de cada sistema artístico mas também revela as correspondências e as similaridades no modo de produção da obra e nas concepções de arte, de representação, de linguagem, de signo presentes nos contos e nas telas desses artistas.<br>Considering the evolution in the fields of artist production and of critics exercises, this presents a comparative analysis among three short stories by the Brazilian writer Lygia Fagundes Telles and three paintings by the Belgian painter René Magritte. This analysis shows, from the concept of structural homology developed by Aguinaldo José Gonçalves, the structural and procedural correspondences between Literature and Painting and its specificities as works of different artistic systems. The way how each work, text or painting, deals with the relation between art and reality was the rail that led the analysis, that also intent shows that the question of representation is central in the composition as much the short stories as the paintings. In this way, this analysis not just reflects about each artistic systems specificities but also reveals the correspondences and similarities in the way of production of the art object and in the conception of art, representation, language, sign in the short stories and paintings by these artists.

Orientador: Sérgio Vicente Motta<br>Banca: Maria de Lourdes Ortiz Gandini Bladan<br>Banca: Aguinaldo José Gonçalves<br>Resumo: Considerando a evolução nos campos da produção artística e do próprio exercício crítico, o presente trabalho consiste em uma análise comparativa entre três contos da escritora brasileira Lygia Fagundes Telles e três telas do pintor belga René Magritte. Essa análise demonstra, a partir do conceito de homologia estrutural desenvolvido por Aguinaldo José Gonçalves, as correspondências estruturais e procedimentais entre Pintura e Literatura e, também, suas especificidades enquanto obras de códigos diferentes. O modo como cada obra, texto ou tela, trabalha a relação entre arte e realidade foi o fio condutor do processo analítico que também procurou demonstrar como a questão da representação é central na composição tanto dos contos como das pinturas. Assim, o trabalho não apenas reflete sobre as especificidades de cada sistema artístico mas também revela as correspondências e as similaridades no modo de produção da obra e nas concepções de arte, de representação, de linguagem, de signo presentes nos contos e nas telas desses artistas.<br>Abstract: Considering the evolution in the fields of artist production and of critics exercises, this presents a comparative analysis among three short stories by the Brazilian writer Lygia Fagundes Telles and three paintings by the Belgian painter René Magritte. This analysis shows, from the concept of structural homology developed by Aguinaldo José Gonçalves, the structural and procedural correspondences between Literature and Painting and its specificities as works of different artistic systems. The way how each work, text or painting, deals with the relation between art and reality was the rail that led the analysis, that also intent shows that the question of representation is central in the composition as much the short stories as the paintings. In this way, this analysis not just reflects about each artistic systems specificities but also reveals the correspondences and similarities in the way of production of the art object and in the conception of art, representation, language, sign in the short stories and paintings by these artists.<br>Mestre