Academic literature on the topic 'Majority requirement for ballot outcome'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Majority requirement for ballot outcome.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Majority requirement for ballot outcome"
Creighton, Breen, Catrina Denvir, Richard Johnstone, Shae McCrystal, and Alice Orchiston. "Pre-Strike Ballots and Collective Bargaining: The Impact of Quorum and Ballot Mode Requirements on Access to Lawful Industrial Action." Industrial Law Journal 48, no. 3 (September 12, 2018): 343–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwy022.
Full textSutherland, Keith. "The Two Sides of the Representative Coin." Studies in Social Justice 5, no. 2 (December 24, 2011): 197–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v5i2.987.
Full textAlam, Shahzad, Akunuri Shalini, Rajesh Hegde, and Rufaida Mazahir. "Acute kidney injury as a predictor of poor outcome post cardiopulmonary bypass in children." International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 4, no. 1 (December 21, 2016): 234. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20164611.
Full textSinger, Matthew M. "Was Duverger Correct? Single-Member District Election Outcomes in Fifty-three Countries." British Journal of Political Science 43, no. 1 (August 20, 2012): 201–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007123412000233.
Full textOppelland, Torsten. "Die thüringische Landtagswahl vom 27. Oktober 2019: Das nächste Experiment – eine rot-rot-grüne Minderheitsregierung mit Verfallsdatum." Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 51, no. 2 (2020): 325–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2020-2-325.
Full textSharma, Ravi, and Swapnil Baheti. "Outcome of neonatal ventilation: a prospective and cross-sectional study in tertiary care centre." International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 4, no. 5 (August 23, 2017): 1820. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20173793.
Full textRanagattimath, Anand, and Ramesh R. Naik. "Capacity Building for Library Professionals: A Study." International Journal of Emerging Research in Management and Technology 6, no. 8 (June 25, 2018): 146. http://dx.doi.org/10.23956/ijermt.v6i8.131.
Full textArias-Morales, Carlos E., Nicoleta Stoicea, Alicia A. Gonzalez-Zacarias, Diana Slawski, Sujatha P. Bhandary, Theodosios Saranteas, Eva Kaminiotis, and Thomas J. Papadimos. "Revisiting blood transfusion and predictors of outcome in cardiac surgery patients: a concise perspective." F1000Research 6 (February 20, 2017): 168. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10085.1.
Full textB.B, Supriyaa, Manoj Kumar A.S, and N. Bhakthavatchalam. "CLINICAL PROFILE AND OUTCOME OF COVID-19 PATIENTS WITH REQUIREMENT OF OXYGEN THERAPY FOR GREATER THAN ONE WEEK." International Journal of Advanced Research 9, no. 06 (June 30, 2021): 638–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/13056.
Full textPerera, Marlon, Joseph Ischia, Damien Bolton, Arthur Shulkes, Graham S. Baldwin, and Oneel Patel. "Experimental rat models for contrast-induced nephropathy; a comprehensive review." Journal of Nephropathology 9, no. 2 (February 7, 2020): e12-e12. http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jnp.2020.12.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Majority requirement for ballot outcome"
Mlungisi, Ernest Tenza. "The liability of trade unions for conduct of their members during industrial action." Thesis, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/23172.
Full textMercantile Law
LL. D.
Book chapters on the topic "Majority requirement for ballot outcome"
Foley, Edward B. "A Recommitment to Majority Rule." In Presidential Elections and Majority Rule, 121–34. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190060152.003.0007.
Full textRobinson, Max, Keith Hunter, Michael Pemberton, and Philip Sloan. "Diagnosis of oral disease." In Soames' & Southam's Oral Pathology. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199697786.003.0006.
Full text"Another famous legal theorist, Goodhart, wrote an influential essay ‘Determining the ratio of a case’ which refers far more to the ‘principle’ in the case than the ‘ratio’ (1930) 40 Yale LJ 161. He emphasises facts: (a) what are the material facts as found by the judge? (b) what is the judge’s decision? (c) unless there is a new material fact (or there are some missing material facts) a future court, depending upon its place in the court hierarchy, and thus its obligations under the doctrine of precedent, must follow it. Goodhart does consider the rule, or what he calls the principle of the case. He gives a thorough discussion of finding the principle of a case, which revolves around the tension between a range of issues and he also appears clearer about where he considers the principle cannot be found. A major problem with Goodhart’s suggested method, an aspect of which is set out in Figure 4.5, below, is that he places rather a lot of emphasis upon the facts. Although it can be said that reading a judgment in the light of the facts of the case is a core requirement of the doctrine, there also needs to be attention given to the way that the case is: (a) argued; (b) pleaded (exactly how have the lawyers formally lodged the complaint?); (c) reasoned, in relation to other precedents. Every judgment has to be read in the light of previous and, if relevant, with a view as to how subsequent cases may be affected. Even taking these two methods together, problems remain: (a) what should an interpreter do when there is a decision without reasons? Can the ratio be inferred? (b) what can be done with the diversity of forms of judgments? While it is true to say that the ratio decidendi of a previous case comes from the language of a judge, the interpreter (as seen from Chapter 2) can bring new meanings. In the appellate courts, depending upon the importance of the case, three, five or seven judges can sit. Each can give judgment, although often a judge says ‘I concur with my learned colleague, Lord Bridge’ or some such similar phrase. At times there may be one or more judgments disagreeing with the majority view that a certain litigant should win the case. In such cases, there is no doubt that each reasoned judgment has a ratio. But can it be said that there is a ratio of the court? There is, of course, no problem where it is clear that the majority agree with the same statements of the application of the law. But what if the different judges agree on outcome and disagree on reasons for the outcome? This can happen. Consider Figure 4.4, below." In Legal Method and Reasoning, 82. Routledge-Cavendish, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843145103-61.
Full text