Academic literature on the topic 'Manfredo Tafuri'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Manfredo Tafuri.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Manfredo Tafuri"
1
Skansi, Luka. "Manfredo Tafuri and the critique of realism." SAJ - Serbian Architectural Journal 6, no. 3 (2014): 182–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/saj1402182s.
Full textAbstract:
One of the main themes of Manfredo Tafuri's historical work, whether he was analyzing Renaissance, Enlightenment or the 20th century architecture, has been that of trying to illustrate the distance between architect's work and reality. This topic is also the premise, the introductory theoretical frame for his critical and historical discourses that are inherent to his "critique of realism": a critique that was expressed in the essay Architettura e Realismo [Architecture and Realism], published in 1985. A text that represented the conclusion of Tafuri's observation on the Italian postwar architectural culture. In this essay the Italian neorealism became the object of a rather unique historical contextualization, the object of Tafuri's deep critique and, ultimately, of his demystification.
2
Sherer, Daniel. "Manfredo Tafuri: Choosing History." Journal of Architecture 14, no. 6 (December 2009): 731–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602360903357146.
Full text
3
Gedutis, Aldis. "Architektūrinės ir istorinės Klaipėdos vizijų konkurencija: drąsūs sprendimai ar darnus išsaugojimas?" Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas 30, no. 1 (January 1, 2012): 210–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/socmintvei.2012.1.403.
Full textAbstract:
Santrauka. Svarstant aktualius miesto planavimo ir įvaizdžio klausimus bene daugiausia kontroversijų kelia dabarties ir praeities architektūriniai objektai. Šie objektai keisdami miesto veidą tuo pat metu koreguoja ir miesto praeitį. Architektūrinės priemonės praeitį gali pertvarkyti, atnaujinti, išsaugoti, naikinti ir t.t. Tokiu būdu architektų veikla patenka į istorikų akiratį. Straipsnyje remiamasi analitine architektūros istoriko Manfredo Tafuri schema, kurioje aiškiai atribojama architektų ir architektūros istorikų veikla. Jei architektai orientuojasi į veiksmą, praktiką, ateities viziją ir utopiją, tai istorikų veikla siejama su teorija, kritiškumu, praeitimi ir atmintimi. Tarp šių kraštutinių figūrų Tafuri įkomponuoja architektūros kritiką, kuris priklausomas tiek nuo architektūros (kaip tyrimo objekto), tiek nuo istorijos (kaip žinių). Tafuri schema nėra pilna – joje trūksta paveldosaugininko. Įtraukiant šį veikiantį asmenį gaunamas išbaigtas modelis, kurį jungia keturios kategorijos: teorija (istorikas ir kritikas), praktika (architektas ir paveldosaugininkas), praeitis (istorikas ir paveldosaugininkas) ir ateitis (architektas ir kritikas). Pakoreguota Tafuri schema taikoma analizuojant Klaipėdos mieste 1990–2010 vykusias sąveikas, diskusijas ir kontroversijas, atsižvelgiant į dvi dominuojančias miesto planavimo bei materialaus paveldo apsaugos vizijas – architektūrinę ir istorinę.Raktažodžiai: architektūra, istorija, konkurencija, Manfredo Tafuri, Klaipėda.Keywords: architecture, history, competition, Manfredo Tafuri, Klaipeda. ABSTRACTTHE COMPETITION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORICAL VISIONS OF KLAIPEDA: BRAVE DECISIONS VS. SUSTAINABLE PRESERVATIONThe issue of the relation of Klaipeda’s image to urban planning has been the subject of intense debate. Old and new buildings transforming Klaipeda’s image at once correct and adjust the city’s past: its past can for example be reshaped, renewed, preserved or destroyed by architectural means. Thus architecture becomes an object of historical interest. In this article the analytic scheme proposed by the architectural historian Manfredo Tafuri is employed. Importantly, Tafuri dissociates architects from architectural historians: the former is operative, utopian and future-oriented; the latter is critical, memorial and oriented to the past. Between the two extremes Tafuri places the figure of the architectural critic, who is dependent on both architecture (as an object) and history (as knowledge). Such a schema is however incomplete as Tafuri ignores the figure of the expert of heritage protection. In the expert of heritage protection Tafuri’s schema can be refigured around four categories: theory (historian and critic), practice (architect and expert of heritage protection), past (historian and expert of heritage protection) and future (architect and critic). This upgraded framework is applied to the case of Klaipeda city in order to describe recent encounters, controversies and conflicts between two predominant visions – architectural and historical – concerning city planning and the protection of material heritage.
4
Agüero, Ana Clarisa. "Manfredo Tafuri, Fernando Aliata, Anahi Ballent, Alejandro Crispiani, Mercedes Daguerre, Adrián Gorelik, Jorge Francisco Liernur, Graciela Silvestri, Tafuri en Argentina." Prismas - Revista de historia intelectual 24, no. 1 (June 1, 2020): 348–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.48160/18520499prismas24.1160.
Full textAbstract:
Manfredo Tafuri, Fernando Aliata, Anahi Ballent, Alejandro Crispiani, Mercedes Daguerre, Adrián Gorelik, Jorge Francisco Liernur, Graciela Silvestri, Tafuri en Argentina, Santiago de Chile, ARQ ediciones, 2019, 274 páginas
5
Ackerman, James S. "In Memoriam: Manfredo Tafuri, 1935-1994." Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 53, no. 2 (June 1, 1994): 137–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/990889.
Full text
6
Romano, Dennis. "Venice and the Renaissance. Manfredo Tafuri." Journal of Modern History 63, no. 4 (December 1991): 795–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/244406.
Full text
7
Hartoonian, Gevork. "Andrew Leach,Manfredo Tafuri, Choosing History." Architectural Theory Review 12, no. 2 (December 2007): 220–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13264820701730959.
Full text
8
Day, Gail. "Manfredo Tafuri, Fredric Jameson and the Contestations of Political Memory." Historical Materialism 20, no. 1 (2012): 31–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156920612x631099.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe Italian architectural historian Manfredo Tafuri (1935–94) developed a distinctive Marxist approach of critical analysis, which has prompted extensive responses. The reception of his work in the United States in the 1970s and 80s – the intervention of Fredric Jameson, especially – forms an important moment of historiographical mutation, in which the status of Tafuri’s politics holds an intriguing place: it was eviscerated in the very act of its affirmation. At stake is not simply the problems attending the transatlantic migration of a body of architectural theory, but also a question lying at the heart of Tafuri’s analysis: the problems of achieving social reforms, above all, in ‘working-class housing’. The difficulties encountered by projects to improve accommodation – from Weimar Germany and Red Vienna in the 1920s to the programmes of postwar Italy – provide the concrete material for Tafuri’s analysis while remaining a significant blind-spot within most of the commentary. Tafuri is here reappraised in the light of the political debates over the ‘neorealist architecture’ of the 1950s and the reform-policies of the Italian centre-Left in the early 1960s. Proceeding as if this formative moment never happened, Tafuri’s critics often engage in debates which confuse his critique of the building projects with political despair, and which appeal to enclave-building despite Tafuri’s explicit questioning of such strategies.
9
Osima, Ken Tadashi. "Manfredo Tafuri and Japan: An Incomplete Project." Architectural Theory Review 8, no. 1 (April 2003): 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13264820309478470.
Full text
10
Leach, Andrew. "Project of Crisis: Manfredo Tafuri and Contemporary Architecture." Journal of Architectural Education 69, no. 1 (January 2, 2015): 119–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2015.989068.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Manfredo Tafuri"
1
Assennato, Marco. "Une Marseillaise sans Bastille à prendre : Manfredo Tafuri enquête par la philosophie." Thesis, Paris Est, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PESC1019/document.
Full textAbstract:
Depuis quelques années, une certaine récupération des idées de Manfredo Tafuri est en cours. Pourtant cette diffusion d'idées n'est pas exempte d’incompréhensions et de malentendus. L'œuvre de Tafuri est marqué par une approche théorique forte: dans ses écrits travaillent les questions le plus aiguës d'un chapitre oublié et pourtant fondamental de la philosophie italienne récente. La recherche porte principalement le schéma de ce questionnement philosophique et sur son impact sur le débat architectural. Il s'agit de sonder une série de nœuds théoriques apparemment distincts ou plus larges que les problématiques architecturales telles qu’elles sont habituellement posées: la modernité, la technique, les langages, la liberté et les conditionnements de l'action subjective. A travers la pluralité des thèmes affrontés, ce qui s’est dégagé, est que le travail de cet historien, dans son ensemble, a été principalement traversé par le problème théorique du projet. Chez Tafuri on trouve une extraordinaire cartographie philosophique de l'architecture. Cartographie qui fonctionne par fragments, traces, emblèmes d'un débat plus large qui concerne la politique et l'histoire des intellectuels italiens entre 1960 et 1980Certain aspects of Manfredo Tafuri's work have been recently reexamined by the academic community. However, the redraft of his ideas has likely generated both several misunderstandings and misconceptions. His theoretical approach is one of the main keys to interpret his work: the issue of any architectural process is the complexity of the process itself. The theoretical issues of an architectural project relates to Tafuri’s argument regarding the basic constraints that we could find in the philosophical debate about modernity, techniques, languages, freedom and the constraints on subjective action. Tafuri tracks an extraordinarily rich cartography of architecture and a cultural and political pathway that connects a wide critical thinking sphere of the Italian intelligentsia between the 1960s and 1980s
2
Mutlu, Tunca Gulru. "Doubling:." Phd thesis, METU, 2009. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12610473/index.pdf.
Full textAbstract:
Italian architectural historian and critic, Manfredo Tafuri, with his seminal book Theories and History of Architecture, issued in 1968, started a new era in the architectural discourse. With his eminent theorization of &ldquoarchitecture as the critique of ideology,&rdquo
Tafuri had shifted the critique of architecture to a political and Marxist level and this revolutionary understanding had absolute impacts on the institutionalization of the American critical discourse after 1968. This study is a historical criticism of the said intellectual interaction that examines the related theoretical transformations in discourse through specific publications, exhibitions, and symposiums. The 1972 MoMA exhibition, entitled Italy: The New Domestic Landscape (INDL) was a singular &ldquo
case&rdquo
in this examination since the first encounter of American intellectuals with the English translation of Tafuri&rsquo
s text, introducing a historical language, was through its catalog. Assigning the exhibition as a &ldquo
moment of crisis&rdquo
that had critical determining value for the comprehension of the entire sequence, this study attempts to reveal its significance, by analyzing the INDL catalog with a Tafurian methodology. In its entirety, the present study is a historical criticism of a sequence, which, however, does not refer to a linear flow of time. It is the &ldquo
project of crises&rdquo
in that particular sequence, a &ldquo
historical project&rdquo
in Tafurian sense. The project begins with the &ldquo
doubling&rdquo
of the INDL catalog. It recomposes the process into autonomous narratives, and then establishes an analytical relationship between those and Italophile inclinations in related texts, published in the periodical Oppositions between 1974 and 1984.
3
Johnsson, Anders. "Movements." Thesis, KTH, Arkitektur, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-262838.
Full textAbstract:
This thesis project explores the question of the death of architecture; the declaration of the lost abilities of architecture to achieve political influence and the architect as a social actor. As I have found myself in agreement with this Tafurian perspective on the subject, I wanted to use this thesis project to explore the question of architecture and its political potential, as well as breaking from the paralyzing condition of the incentives of architecture's incapabilities. This, in suggesting that architecture can act as a catalyst for doing things differently. The project investigates, on the one hand, how a building can encourage political action and engagement, and, on the other, how ideological ideas and intentions can concretize spatially, materially and aesthetically, The project is an design exploration concretized in a specific architectural proposal – a building for a political organization operating in the city of Stockholm.
4
Corna, Luisa Lorenza. "Thinking through antinomies : an enquiry into Manfredo Tafuri's historical method." Thesis, University of Leeds, 2016. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/15796/.
Full textAbstract:
The following thesis addresses Manfredo Tafuri's historical and critical method. It considers a selection of studies conducted by the Italian historian at different moments of his intellectual trajectory, and it explores how his unorthodox approach succeeded in challenging established architectural accounts and in exposing the ideologically constructed figure of the architect. The thesis takes its points of departure from Fredric Jameson's interpretation of Tafuri and Francesco Dal Co's book Modern Architecture as a story of sequential failed attempts to resolve the contradiction between the city and the building (or more abstractly, between totality and individual work). Expanding on Jameson's reading, it illustrates how, in the selection of works considered, Tafuri organises his narrative around pairs of (apparently) antinomic terms such as plan and Plan, image and fragment, rule and licence, reality and utopia. Central to the thesis is also the charting of the theoretical and political encounters that shaped Tafuri's mode of thinking. Chapter One focuses on Tafuri and Italian Workerism. It investigates how the Frankfurt School-inflected critique of planning initiated by the founder of Workerism Raniero Panzieri inspired Tafuri's own reading of urban planning. It also looks at the way Tafuri extended the critique of intellectual labour advanced within the frame of the Italian Marxist journal Contropiano to the domain of architecture. Chapter Two tackles Tafuri's analysis of the use of fragment and fragmentation in the work of the Venetian etcher Giambattista Piranesi and in that of the 20th-century avant-garde. It contends that Tafuri's exploration of the meaning of the fragment in works dating from different historical moments is intended to reveal the effect of capitalist development on the communicative potential of form. Chapter Three takes its lead from the 1977 text 'The Historical "Project"', in which Tafuri establishes a set of guidelines for the historical research which will inform his study of Renaissance architecture in the following years. It examines how the application of this method allows Tafuri to challenge established historical accounts of the Renaissance such as that of Rudolf Wittkower. Finally, Chapter Four returns to Tafuri's earliest interventions in the post-war Italian architectural debate. Whereas the first part considers journal articles on the question of the replanning of Rome, the second focuses on a selection of texts tackling the discussion over the new urban scale and architectural neo-realism.
5
Keyvanian, Carla L. (Carla Lucia) 1962. "Manfredo Tafuri's notion of history and its methodological sources : from Walter Benjamin to Roland Barthes." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/13110.
Full textAbstract:
Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1992.Includes bibliographical references (p. 90-94).
The essay is an analysis Tafuri's theory on historiography;. it traces his methodological sources: the theories, and their mode of reception, that have directly influenced his thought. The period examined starts with Theories and History of Architecture, first published in 1968 and ends with "The Historical 'Project"', the introductory essay of The Sphere and the Labyrinth, published in 1980 The first chapter outlines the intertwining of the two neo-idealist and Marxist components of Tafuri's thought, combined with the early familiarity with the writings of the Nouvelle Critique. Subsequently, it identifies the points that, in Theories and History, represent Tafuri's original contribution to architectural history: the identification of architecture as ideology and the consequent demystifying role that the historian must play; consequently, the formulation of the specific notions that will serve as the instruments for this task of the historian; the identity of history and criticism; the complete separation of the design process from the 'reading' process (Le. history writing) of a building; the logical consequence of this: the 'futility' of history and theory in design; and, finally, the obsoleteness of the mode of criticism termed "operative criticism". The second chapter tackles the problem posed by the contradictory coexistence, in Tafuri's later writings, of Marxist and neo-avant-garde positions. It analyzes in detail what neo-avant-garde ideas were, what they implied and what theoretical and methodological purposes they served. The analysis centers on the strong impact of Foucault's theories on Tafuri, and his equally strong criticism of them. Most importantly, however, it outlines the profound impact of Walter Benjamin's notion of history, particularly as exposed in "The Theses on the Philosophy of History", on Tafuri. In the last chapter, are drawn some partial conclusions on the epistemological implications of Tafuri's theory.
by Carla Keyvanian.
M.S.
6
Der, Chiou Ming, and 邱明德. "Modern Architecture Criticism Research of Manfredo Tafuri." Thesis, 1999. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/27058012575383860751.
Full textAbstract:
碩士中原大學
建築學系
87
Abstract: Tafuri says:"no history,only criticism", which means we can not rebuild the really history process, only through continuous criticism to approach historical reality. Concerning the history, mythology and symbol under wrenched ideology, critical architecture history philosophy and criticism are the historical laborious plan of removing mystical mask. In Tafuri''s critical history philosophy and criticism, "architecture" is not only the fragile constructure technician, the experience of sight, form and style, but also include the whole culture, history, the process of social symbolization, convert of mythology, style, characteristic, fashion etc, the most point of architecture criticism is to rebuild and disbuild the continuous plan of imaginable process. However, "architecture criticism" is a process of recognization, also is objective execution of subjective ideology. Most people can understand the work due to bring inborn sense , meanwhile, by experence accumulation, most people can achieve objective criticism using comparative analysis due to the difference between sense background and thoughtful culture cause the pluralistic development of criticism thought. Therefore, architecture criticism of subjective ideology will face emptiness of none definite opinion, I think, only rely upon reflection and considerations of historical philosophy can face emptiness. Although few scholar considered that statement of architecture criticism always can not complete with everthing and without enough satisfactory and limitation. However, I think that architecture criticism can remove human thoughful shackles and achieve communication between social strata. This kind of critical historical opion and dialectic consideration are continuous reformatory modernism. Concerning condition and essence of modern architecture, I think which can not define to any type, every period has modern concept and technician, which are smash and detached ideology and productive process, also are a kind of continuous, laborious, multiply endlessly, random critical modernity. Current development of modern architecture is a revolution which is dependent on modernity. Therefore, architecture criticism is the modern statement under review different space representation and distinguish, communication, criticism and reverse of space culture type. According to abstract acknowledge build and concrete space practice, research objective foundation in pluralistic ideology.
7
Silva, Diogo Henrique Lopes Pereira da. "Ideologia e desencanto - Vocação Política da Arquitectura em Manfredo Tafuri." Dissertação, 2014. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/76851.
Full textAbstract:
ResumoIdeologia e Desencanto.A viagem que percorre a arquitectura entre a obstinação delirante de querer ser coisa e a autoconsciência da sua iminente morte.Uma oposição que é acima de tudo dialéctica e que incorpora a con-tradição como matéria produtiva, procura informar a arquitectura da sua autónoma vocação política.Encontrando em Manfredo Tafuri a figura magistral do materialis-mo que persegue, os conflitos que no seu rasto se revelam tornaram-se perturbadores, inquietantes na medida suficiente à convicção de uma impe-rativa transformação presente.Quais os instrumentos efectivos da sua análise? De que condição sua nos informa a história? Para quem se dirige? Em que sentido vincula compromissos? O que tem para nos dizer? Qual a sua significação? Em que campo se desenvolve a acção na qual se produz? Que pode ela ser capaz de transformar?Provocações que incitam a abertura de um rasgo de lucidez na opa-cidade da produção da arquitectura contemporânea.A ambição de um Manifesto!AbstractIdeology and Disenchantment.An architectural journey that travels between its delusional obstinacy willing to be thing and the self-conscious of its impending death.An opposition that is above all dialectic and in which contradiction represents a produc-tive matter, seeks to inform Architecture of its autonomous political vocation.In its pursuit of materialism finds in Manfredo Tafuri the masterful figure, the conflicts which disclose from his path have become disturbing, unsettling enough to rise a conviction of mandatory present transformation.What are the effective instruments of its analysis? Of what condition of its informs us history about? To whom is it addressed? In which sense does it bind commitment? What have it to say? What is its signifi-cance? In what field does evolve the action took to produce itself? What might it be able to transform?Incitements instigating to rip in the opacity of contemporary architecture production a gash of lucidity.The ambition of a Manifesto!
8
Silva, Diogo Henrique Lopes Pereira da. "Ideologia e desencanto - Vocação Política da Arquitectura em Manfredo Tafuri." Master's thesis, 2014. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/76851.
Full textAbstract:
ResumoIdeologia e Desencanto.A viagem que percorre a arquitectura entre a obstinação delirante de querer ser coisa e a autoconsciência da sua iminente morte.Uma oposição que é acima de tudo dialéctica e que incorpora a con-tradição como matéria produtiva, procura informar a arquitectura da sua autónoma vocação política.Encontrando em Manfredo Tafuri a figura magistral do materialis-mo que persegue, os conflitos que no seu rasto se revelam tornaram-se perturbadores, inquietantes na medida suficiente à convicção de uma impe-rativa transformação presente.Quais os instrumentos efectivos da sua análise? De que condição sua nos informa a história? Para quem se dirige? Em que sentido vincula compromissos? O que tem para nos dizer? Qual a sua significação? Em que campo se desenvolve a acção na qual se produz? Que pode ela ser capaz de transformar?Provocações que incitam a abertura de um rasgo de lucidez na opa-cidade da produção da arquitectura contemporânea.A ambição de um Manifesto!AbstractIdeology and Disenchantment.An architectural journey that travels between its delusional obstinacy willing to be thing and the self-conscious of its impending death.An opposition that is above all dialectic and in which contradiction represents a produc-tive matter, seeks to inform Architecture of its autonomous political vocation.In its pursuit of materialism finds in Manfredo Tafuri the masterful figure, the conflicts which disclose from his path have become disturbing, unsettling enough to rise a conviction of mandatory present transformation.What are the effective instruments of its analysis? Of what condition of its informs us history about? To whom is it addressed? In which sense does it bind commitment? What have it to say? What is its signifi-cance? In what field does evolve the action took to produce itself? What might it be able to transform?Incitements instigating to rip in the opacity of contemporary architecture production a gash of lucidity.The ambition of a Manifesto!
9
Abreu, Luís Nuno Borges. "Os discursos da Arquitetura e o discurso político entre Manfredo Tafuri e Henri Lefebvre." Master's thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/37284.
Full textAbstract:
Dissertação de mestrado integrado em ArquitecturaO espaço político é o locos de uma crise. Se, historicamente falando, por um momento a Arte foi chamada pela necessidade a projectar o seu estatuto político, agora, a forma política revela-se “problemática”. A arquitetura, entre outras disciplinas da prática do espaço, iniciou a sua própria leitura disciplinar de tal contexto “artístico” que é, pela sua própria definição, um contexto em crise permanente. Alguma da literatura marxista na segunda metade do século XX. projetou um tipo de pensamento radical do qual resultou um ataque à prática da arquitetura baseado, fundamentalmente, num “imperativo politico”. Tal “mentalidade” outrora, em comparação com uma possível “crise da política” hoje, proporciona o enquadramento histórico do assunto. A nossa atenção está focada em duas tendências de crítica providenciadas pelos autores Manfredo Tafuri e Henri Lefebvre. Perspetivamos que existem “novos” signficados a serem compreendidos, descritos numa “colisão” (analitica) entre as tendências.
Political space is the locos of a crisis. If, historically speaking, for a moment Art was called by necessity to project it’s political status, now, the political form founds itself a “problematic” feature. Architecture, among other disciplines of practice space, have started its own disciplinary reading of such “artistic” context which is, by it’s own definition, a context in permanent crisis. Some marxist literature in the second half of the twentieth century came to project a sort of radical thought from which arises an attack on architectural practice fundamentally based on a “political imperative”. Such “mentality” then, in comparison with a possible “political crises” today, offers the historical framework of the subject. Our attention is focused in two tendencies of criticism provided by the authors Manfredo Tafuri and Henri Lefebvre. We foresee that there is “new” meanings to understand today, described by a “clash” (analytical one) between those tendencies.
Books on the topic "Manfredo Tafuri"
2
Project Of Crisis Manfredo Tafuri And Contemporary Architecture. MIT Press Ltd, 2013.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Manfredo Tafuri"
1
Nunes, Jorge. "Operative criticism and historical criticism in Manfredo Tafuri." In Tradition and Innovation, 21–24. London: CRC Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429297786-5.
Full text
2
van Bergeijk, Herman. "Manfredo Tafuri:." In Lo storico scellerato, 139–46. Quodlibet, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvj7wmnd.16.
Full text
3
Carpenzano, Orazio, Valeria Gentile, Marco Pietrosanto, and Donatella Scatena. "Manfredo Tafuri." In Lo storico scellerato, 408–18. Quodlibet, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvj7wmnd.38.
Full text
4
Portoghesi, Paolo. "Manfredo Tafuri." In Lo storico scellerato, 37–44. Quodlibet, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvj7wmnd.6.
Full text
5
"Manfredo Tafuri progettista." In Lo storico scellerato, 378–401. Quodlibet, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvj7wmnd.36.
Full text
6
"1980 Manfredo Tafuri." In The Barcelona Pavilion by Mies van der Rohe, 203–5. De Gruyter, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783035619935-063.
Full text
7
"1980 Manfredo Tafuri." In Mies van der Rohe Barcelona-Pavillon, 224–25. De Gruyter, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783035619911-063.
Full text
8
Riondino, Antonio. "Gli esordi romani di Manfredo Tafuri." In Lo storico scellerato, 183–96. Quodlibet, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvj7wmnd.19.
Full text
9
Bruni, Angela Raffaella. "Manfredo Tafuri legge Giovan Battista Piranesi." In Lo storico scellerato, 299–311. Quodlibet, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvj7wmnd.29.
Full text
10
Rossi, Piero Ostilio. "Manfredo Tafuri, Ludovico Quaroni e Bruno Zevi." In Lo storico scellerato, 149–68. Quodlibet, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvj7wmnd.17.
Full text