Academic literature on the topic 'Marsilius, of Padua, d. 1342?'

Статья посвящена анализу «малых сочинений» («О перенесении империи» - «De translatione Imperii»; «Трактат о юрисдикции императора в брачных делах» - «Tractatus de iurisdictione imperatoris in causis matrimonialibus»; «Малый защитник» - «Defensor minor») Марсилия Падуанского (1275-1342), выдающегося философа, полемиста, ректора Парижского университета, сподвижника Людовика IV Баварского, критика папских доктрин «plenitudo potestatis» и «potestas clavium», автора знаменитого трактата «Защитник мира» («Defensor pacis»), и их месту в политической мысли, интеллектуальной культуре и полемической традиции первой половины XIV в. Автор выдвигает гипотезу о датировке трактата «О перенесении империи» и вероятном контексте его написания, а также выявляет связь между всеми работами Марсилия Падуанского. The article is devoted to analysis of the «opuscula» («On the Transfer of the Empire» - «De translatione Imperii»; «The Treatise on the Emperor’s Jurisdiction in Matrimonial Matters» - «Tractatus de iurisdictione imperatoris in causis matrimonialibus», «The Smaller Defendor» - «Defensor minor») of Marsilius of Padua (1275-1342), an outstanding philosopher, polemicist, rector of the University of Paris, Ludwif IV of Bavaria’s companion in arms, critic of pope’s doctrines «plenitudo potestatis» and «potestas clavium», author of the famous treatise «The Defender of the Peace» («Defensor pacis»), and its place in political thought, intellectual culture and polemical tradition of the first half of XIV century. The author puts forward a hypothesis, concerning dating of the «On the Transfer of the Empire» treatise and possible context of its writing, and also reveals connection between all Marsilius of Padua’s works.

Em boa parte do Artigo 68 do Livro Primeiro de seu Estado e Pranto da Igreja, Álvaro Pais, O. Min. (c. 1270-1349) refuta 5 proposições com implicações políticas atribuídas a Marsílio de Pádua (1280-1342). Neste artigo, analisamos a refutação dessas proposições feitas pelo Menorita galego, comparando-as, de um lado, com os textos, efetivamente escritos pelo Médico paduano, que se encontram em sua obra Defensor da Paz (1324) e, de outro, cotejando-o com uma Epistula ad quosdam cardinales, de autoria do mencionado Frade, escrita pelo menos dois anos antes. Desse estudo resultaram as seguintes conclusões: 1 – Frei Álvaro, sem fazer nenhuma alusão, apoiou-se basicamente na mencionada Epistula. 2 – Sob o aspecto doutrinal, essencialmente, não há diferença entre ambos os textos alvarinos. 3 – Nos dois textos, o Franciscano galego não compulsou o Defensor da Paz, tendo utilizado as teses que os censores dessa obra imputaram ao seu autor; em 1327, quando o Papa João XXII condenou-a como herética. PALAVRAS-CHAVE – Álvaro Pais. Marsílio de Pádua. Plenitude do poder. Filosofia política. ABSTRACT In a large part of the Article 68 of the Book one of his Status et Planctus Ecclesiae, Alvarus Pelagius O. Min. (c. 1270-1349) refutes five propositions, having political implications, attributed to Marsilius Patavinus (1280-1342). In this study, we analyze the refutation of these propositions made by Alvarus, comparing, on the one hand, with the texts, really, written by Marsilius, which are in his book entitled Defensor pacis (1324), and on the other hand, quoting Alvarus’ text with the Epistula ad quosdam cardinales, also written by the mentioned Franciscan friar two years before. From this study, resulted the following conclusions: 1 – Without to do any mention in the Article 68, the principal Alvarus’ source was the referred Epistula. 2 – Considering the two texts written by Fr. Alvarus, according the doctrinal aspect, they are essentially equal. 3 – In both texts we could see that Alvarus not had in his hands the Defensor Pacis, having used the thesis which the censors of this book imputed to Marsilius in 1327, when this book was condemned as heretic by the Pope John XXII. KEY WORDS – Alvarus Pelagius. Marsilius of Padua. Plentitude of power. Political philosophy.