Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Marxist literary criticism

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters
Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Marxist literary criticism'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 25 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Marxist literary criticism.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Marxist literary criticism"

1

Boer, Roland. "Twenty-five Years of Marxist Biblical Criticism." Currents in Biblical Research 5, no. 3 (June 2007): 298–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476993x07077963.

Full text

Abstract:

In the context of a renewed interest in Marxism outside biblical studies, this article surveys and critiques the background and current status of a similar renewal in biblical studies. It begins with a consideration of the background of current studies in liberation, materialist and political theologies, and moves on to note the division between literary and social scientific uses of Marxist theories. While those who used Marxist literary methods were initially inspired by Terry Eagleton and Fredric Jameson, more recent work has begun to make use of a whole tradition of Marxist literary criticism largely ignored in biblical studies. More consistent work, however, has taken place in the social sciences in both Hebrew Bible and New Testament studies. In Hebrew Bible studies, debates focus on the question of mode of production, especially the domestic or household mode of production, while in New Testament studies, the concerns have been with reconstructing the context of the Jesus movement and, more recently, the Pauline correspondence. I close with a number of questions concerning the division into different areas of what is really a holistic approach to texts and history.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Hamadi, Lutfi. "The Concept of Ideology in Marxist Literary Criticism." European Scientific Journal, ESJ 13, no. 20 (July 31, 2017): 154. http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n20p154.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper attempts an exploration of the development of the Marxist literary theory in general and the concept of ideology in particular. Showing the significant role this theory plays in the field of literary criticism, the paper focuses on remarkable Marxist figures, explores their most notable works, and sheds light on their contributions to the theory and the field of literary criticism. For this purpose, the paper starts with basic Marxist principles of reading literature set by Marx and Engels and examines the changes that occurred with other critics, mainly Althusser, Jameson, and Eagleton in their attempts to show the importance of ideology in explaining literature and understanding its backgrounds, goals, and methods. Thus, the methodology will include an historical overview, shedding light on early Marxist perspectives, comparing and contrasting the contributions and adjustments added by remarkable Marxist thinkers, and illustrating by examples of literary texts and how they are seen and analyzed by these Marxist scholars.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Jameson, Fredric. "Marxist Criticism and Hegel." Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 131, no. 2 (March 2016): 430–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2016.131.2.430.

Full text

Abstract:

The interesting question is in fact a two-way street. Familiar enough, with its accusatory hint of idealism and intellectualizing elitism, is the query, In what sense was Marx a Hegelian? But more tantalizing, more science fictional and counterfactual, is its echoing alternative: In what sense was Hegel a Marxist? The sharing of the dialectic is of course the easy way out, in a speculative dilemma calculated to open up fresh answers and unexpected new problems. I will only take on one of them here—namely, what Hegel might have to tell us about the possibilities, and also the limits, of Marxist literary criticism, an issue that may seem as remote today as literature itself (and the theorizing criticism of it).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Zhang, Wei. "The Development of Marxist Shakespearean Criticism in China." Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance 20, no. 35 (December 30, 2019): 99–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.20.08.

Full text

Abstract:

Chinese Shakespearean criticism from Marxist perspectives is highly original in Chinese Shakespeare studies. Scholars such as Mao Dun, Yang Hui, Zhao Li, Fang Ping, Yang Zhouhan, Bian Zhilin, Meng Xianqiang, Sun Jiaxiu, Zhang Siyang and Wang Yuanhua adopt the basic principles and methods of Marxism to elaborate on Shakespeare’s works and have made great achievements. With ideas changed in different political climates, they have engaged in Shakespeare studies for over eight decades since the 1930s. At the beginning of the revolutionary age, they advocated revolutionary literature, followed Russian Shakespearean criticism from the Marxist perspective, and established the mode of class analysis and highlighted realism. Before and after the Cultural Revolution, they were concerned about class, reality and people. They also showed the “left-wing” inclination, taking literature as a tool to serve politics. Since the 1980s, they have been free from politics and entered the pure academic realm, analysing Shakespearean dramas with Marxist aesthetic theories and transforming from sociological criticism to literary criticism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Ghosh, Ritwik. "Marxism and Latin American Literature." SMART MOVES JOURNAL IJELLH 8, no. 4 (April 28, 2020): 208. http://dx.doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v8i4.10539.

Full text

Abstract:

In the aftermath of the collapse of the U.S.S.R Marxism remains a viable and flourishing tradition of literary and cultural criticism. Marx believed economic and social forces shape human consciousness, and that the internal contradictions in capitalism would lead to its demise.[i] Marxist analyses can show how class interests operate through cultural forms.[ii] Marxist interpretations of cultural life have been done by critics such as C.L.R James and Raymond Williams.[iii]

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Barry, P. "Feminist Literary Criticism; Modernism/Postmodernism; New Historicism and Renaissance Drama; Contemporary Marxist Literary Criticism." English 42, no. 173 (June 1, 1993): 182–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/english/42.173.182.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Murphy, John W. "The importance of postmodernism for Marxist literary criticism." Studies in Soviet Thought 34, no. 4 (November 1987): 233–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01043537.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Markov, Alexander V. "FROM IDEALISM TO NEW MARXISM. PART 1. LEV PUMPYANSKY." Articult, no. 2 (2021): 83–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2227-6165-2021-2-83-90.

Full text

Abstract:

Lev Pumpyansky's turn at the end of the 1920s from criticism of Marxism to the full acceptance of Marxist sociology as the main working tool of the literary historian can be viewed as a capitulation, but it could also be a disclosure of the potential of previous criticism. I prove that the criticism of Marxism by Pumpyansky fully fit into the dispute of neo-Kantianism against Hegelianism, while his sociology of literature was based on neo-Kantian foundations and the acceptance of Hegel's dialectics, but not Hegelian philosophy. I reconstruct a common source for Pumpyansky and Bakhtin’s view from the outside to both the neo-Kantian and neo-Hegelian traditionsm, an episode from Plato's Phaedo. The difference in the understanding of the novel genre led Pumpyansky and Bakhtin to opposite conclusions. Pumpyansky's interpretation of the difference between the novel and the novella allowed him to accept Marxism as a metacritic of Neo-Hegelianism and Neo-Kantianism, preserving the position of the hero, which was unacceptable for Bakhtin. For Pumpyansky, Marxist sociology just realizes the intentions of neo-Kantianism as soon as it is applied not to the field of science, but to the field of literature and art. Disagreeing with the convergence of ethics and creativity, promoted by Bakhtin, Pumpyansky coined a consistent Marxist sociology of literature, claiming to be philosophical and relevant for today.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Kelsall, Malcolm. "The Worker in the Landscape: Constable, Marx, Poetry." Romanticism 26, no. 3 (October 2020): 255–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/rom.2020.0476.

Full text

Abstract:

Since John Berger's Ways of Seeing (1972) Marxist criticism of John Constable has criticised his landscapes as ‘Tory’ mystifications of the condition of the agricultural worker. This essay challenges this Marxist approach by returning to the philosophical basis of the traditional approach to painting to which Constable subscribed: ut pictura poesis. It is argued that his relation of poetry to landscape seeks to emphasize the importance of agricultural labour to all human activity and by uniting the diurnal with the demotic enhances the status of the common worker. In this respect Marxist criticism, properly applied, should read Constable positively. By altering perception of the importance of labour Constable, like early Wordsworth, or Blake and Shelley, is a potentially revolutionary artist.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Tally, Robert T. "Boundless Mystification." South Atlantic Quarterly 119, no. 4 (October 1, 2020): 779–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00382876-8663687.

Full text

Abstract:

In Marxist literary criticism—for example, as represented by Fredric Jame-son’s influential study, The Political Unconscious—the interpretation of texts has frequently involved ideology critique, by which the critic attempts to disclose both the ideological content or structural limitations of a given text while also being attuned to the text’s utopian or revolutionary potential. In recent decades, Marxist criticism in particular and what is taken to be the hermeneutics of suspicion more generally have come under attack by literary scholars who favor various forms of postcritique, including surface reading and thin description. This essay suggests that postcritique, and all that it involves, contributes to the radical dismantling of higher education caused by rampant neoliberalism. The vocation of ideology critique and of Marxist criticism is, this essay contends, the most appropriate response to a society so utterly mystified as our own.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Marxist literary criticism"

1

Price, Brinley. "The language of traffic : colonial slavery and political discourse in the late eighteenth century." Thesis, University of York, 1997. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2529/.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Andersson, Malin. ""If I Could Think of Somewhere to Go" : Alienation in S.E. Hinton's Rumble Fish." Thesis, Karlstads universitet, Institutionen för språk, litteratur och interkultur, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-41141.

Full text

Abstract:

This essay focuses on the alienation experienced by Rusty-James in S.E. Hinton’s Rumble Fish (1975). It more specifically centers on the causes of his alienation and how the alienation is illustrated in the novel. The analysis shows that the alienation Rusty-James experiences is caused partly by socioeconomic factors; for example his lack of hope for the future is closely connected to the fact that he belongs to a low socioeconomic class. In addition, there are also psychological factors, for example a childhood trauma. The alienation and its causes are mainly illustrated through the symbolism of the featured Siamese fighting fish and how Rusty-James’ relationships are depicted.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Hestetun, Øyunn. "A prison-house of myth? symptomal readings in Virgin land, The madwoman in the Attic, and The political unconscious /." Stockholm : Almqvist & Wiksell, 1993. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb35577879j.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Dvorak, John N. "Lukácsian aesthetics in a post-modern world: understanding Thomas Pynchon’s Mason & Dixon through the lens of Georg Lukács’ the historical novel." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/3896.

Full text

Abstract:

Master of Arts
Department of English
Timothy A. Dayton
This thesis project seeks to reconcile the literary criticism of Marxist critic and advocate of literary realism Georg Lukács with the writing of postmodern author Thomas Pynchon in order to validate the continued relevance of Lukácsian aesthetics. Chapter 1 argues that Lukács’ The Historical Novel is not only a valid lens with which to analyze Pynchon’s own historical novel, Mason & Dixon, but that such analysis will yield valuable insight. Chapter 2 illustrates the aesthetic transition from the historical drama to the historical novel by using Lukács’ ideas to explicate The Courier’s Tragedy, a historical drama found within the pages of Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49. Chapter 3 applies Lukács’ ideas on the “world-historical” figure and the “mediocre” hero of the classic historical novel to Mason & Dixon. Chapter 4 asserts that Mason & Dixon enables contemporary readers to experience the novel as what Lukács calls a “prehistory” to the present. This chapter also illustrates how the prehistory of Mason & Dixon anticipates Pynchon’s nonfiction essay “A Journey into the Mind of Watts.” Finally, this chapter demonstrates how Pynchon avoids the pitfall of modernization in Mason & Dixon, which Lukács defines as the dressing up of contemporary crises and psychology in a historical setting. Chapter 5 ties together the work of the previous four chapters and offers conclusions on both what Pynchon teaches us about Lukács, as well as what Lukács helps us to learn about Pynchon.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Shashidhar, R. "From literary criticism to Marxism : an analysis of the holistic writings of Raymond Williams." Thesis, University of Manchester, 1989. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.686243.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Rivetti, Ugo Urbano Casares. "Crítica e modernidade em Raymond Williams." Universidade de São Paulo, 2015. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8132/tde-27012016-123033/.

Full text

Abstract:

Esta dissertação tem como objetivo examinar a obra do crítico Raymond Williams a partir do ponto de vista da crítica da modernidade levada a cabo pelo autor em um período específico de sua trajetória: entre Cultura e sociedade (1958) e O campo e a cidade (1973). Para tanto, parte-se da reconstrução da forma assumida por essa crítica nos esquemas interpretativos daquelas que foram as duas grandes influências formativas do pensamento de Williams, e que figuraram como as duas grandes correntes teóricas no cenário intelectual inglês do século XX: a crítica literária e o marxismo. Pretende-se oferecer, com isso, uma leitura alternativa da obra do autor, repensando o peso de cada um de seus principais textos, as linhas de continuidade e as rupturas atravessando-a e, por fim, o próprio sentido do desenvolvimento teórico percorrido por Williams no período considerado, notadamente, destacando-se o impacto que o marxismo exerceu na conformação do seu projeto teórico.
This dissertation aims to analyze Raymond Williams work from the point of view of the critique of modernity undertaken by him in a specific period of his trajectory: from Culture and Society (1958) to The Country and the City (1973). Therefore, we begin by reconstructing the forms assumed by this critique in the interpretative schemes of the two greatest formative influences in Williams thought, and which became the two greatest theoretical currents in the English intellectual scenario in the 20th century: literary criticism and Marxism. Hence, we plan to offer an alternative interpretation of his oeuvre, reconsidering the importance of each of his main texts, the continuities and ruptures crossing it and, finally, the sense of the theoretical development covered by Williams in the period here considered, notably, focusing the impact that Marxism produced in the shaping of his theoretical project.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Alvandi, Nazanin. "Literary Theory in Upper Secondary School : Should It Be Used Before Higher Education?" Thesis, Högskolan i Jönköping, Högskolan för lärande och kommunikation, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-44612.

Full text

Abstract:

This essay examines the use of literary theory when teaching literature before higher education. The objective isto see how and if the integration of literary theory facilitates students’ engagement with and understanding of literature. The study is conducted with the qualitative method of interviews. Four teachers, certified for upper secondary school, were deemed appropriate to interview about their current use of literary theory, as well as their attitudes towards an increased use of literary theory. Besides the data collected through interviews, this study finds its theoretical foundation in the literary theories feminist, Marxist and postcolonial theory as well as in the Swedish curriculum for English at upper secondary level. Presently, the teachers do not use literary theory distinctly; however, they do consider the use of literary theory together with literature to be beneficial for the students’ understanding of literature and the world around them. Teachers stated that while some students only will grasp the idea of the theories, other students will be able to use and apply them. The curriculum supports the use of literary theory in the core values for students of upper secondary level.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Yu-shiow, Chen Cheng, and 陳鄭玉秀. "Politics, Society, and History in Marxist Literary Criticism: A Jamesonian Reading of Howards End." Thesis, 2001. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/21111711223992280856.

Full text

Abstract:

博士
淡江大學
西洋語文研究所
89
Abstract This dissertation is based on one idea: literature is the direct presentation and guidance of history. Most literary theories in the twentieth century cannot intensively connect literature and history; however; Marxist literary theory, which has developed for nearly one hundred years, shows its superiority in this aspect. From Marx and Engels, through Lukács and Goldmann, to Macherey, we see the basic points in Marxist historical interpretation: the political and the social. From these two angles, Marxist literary theory has been continuously subsuming other Western literary theories for attempting to evaluate the significance in literature and literary texts. Nevertheless, we have to point out that the realm of historical interpretation cannot be contained in Marxist literary theory. In addition, the political and the social are not the whole content of literature. Therefore, it is necessary to find a different historical interpretation for reconsidering and criticizing the shortcomings of Marxist historical view and finally tries to bring forward a new historical interpretation to present the essence of literature. This is the historical interpretation from the national and cultural points of view (This also shows the turn of Western historical interpretation, emphasizing post-colonial topics nowadays). This is the process and goal of this dissertation. The author’s focus of discussing the advantage and disadvantage in Marxist theory is on the contemporary Marxist, Jameson’s, theory of “the political, the social, and the historical,” the three concentric framework, and its applied analysis of Howards End, a typical modernist text. There is also Jameson’s later discussion on this text, and the evaluation on his discussion. In Jameson’s “The Political Unconscious,” he establishes the theory of concentric framework. We can see here his persistence in Marxism and his aspiration for other Western literary theories. These two inclinations form both richness and contradictions in his theory. On the other hand, the practical criticism by this theory on Forster, a modernist very early writing about national, gender, and cultural conflicts, and his work is for the general test of Jameson’s Marxist framework. After the criticism on Howards End in Chapter 3, we will clearly point out Jameson’s flaws, his later turn of historical interpretation, and the significance presenting the limits of Marxist theory by this “turn.” Then, this dissertation will focus on the radical commentary, from cultural and national vision, on Marxist and Jameson’s structure of historical interpretation. The author of this dissertation therefore raises an important question: Can Marxist theory solve the contemporary problem of history and literature? Will it keep the propriety for its own existence? In Conclusion, the author will finally provide the readers interested in this question with a proper answer and a brand new concentric framework for the concept of historical interpretation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

"A Marxist critique of D.B.Z. Ntuli's short stories." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/12635.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Raselekoane, Nanga Raymond. "African language literature : towards a multiple reading-approach." Thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/3948.

Full text

Abstract:

This research is premised on Armstrong's (1990:7) argument that „every interpretive approach reveals something only by disguising something else, which a competing method with a different assumption might disclose.‟ This statement indicates that preference or marginalisation of some literary theories impedes progress in African-language literary criticism because different literary theories tend to focus on one or a few selected aspects of a work art. This flows from the assumption that no literary theory can unearth all aspects and meanings of a literary text. This research comes against rigidity, conservatism and narrow-mindedness of those literary critics and scholars who refuse to open up and embrace literary theories which they are opposed to. The research is an attempt to demonstrate the benefit of flexibility and ability to accommodate even those opposing literary views that can make positive contribution in the field of African-language literary criticism. The research further calls for pragmatism, tolerance and co-existence of opposing literary views for the benefit of progress in the field of African-language literary criticism. This research is an acknowledgement of the fact that no literary theory is infallible because all literary theories have their own strong and weak points. In this research, a survey of literary approaches commonly applied in African-language criticism is conducted. This is followed by an analysis of a Tshivenḓa novel (i.e. A si ene) from different literary angles to prove that every literary theory can help to unmask a particular meaning of a literary text which no any other literary theory can do. For example, the intrinsic literary approaches will, most certainly, unlock the meaning of a literary text differently from the way the extrinsic literary theories do because diverse literary approaches focus on different aspects or elements of a work of art. This research is an endorsement of the argument that through multiple-reading of a literary text, readers‟ understanding of the same literary text is broadened and deepened.
African Languages
D. Litt. et Phil (African Languages)

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Marxist literary criticism"

1

Eagleton, Terry. Marxism and literary criticism. London: Routledge, 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Eagleton, Terry. Marxism and Literary Criticism. London: Taylor & Francis Group Plc, 2004.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Eagleton, Terry. Marxism and literary criticism. New York: Routledge, 2002.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Marxist literary and cultural theories. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: MacMillan, 2000.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Eagleton, Terry. Criticism and ideology: A study in Marxist literary theory. London: Verso, 2006.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

The politics of literary theory: An introduction to Marxist criticism. Tallahassee: Florida State University Press, 1990.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Frow, John. Marxism and literary history. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Marxism and literary history. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1986.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

1948-, Howard Jean E., and Shershow Scott Cutler 1953-, eds. Marxist Shakespeares. London: Routledge, 2001.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

The new hegemony in literary studies: Contradictions in theory. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press, 2003.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Marxist literary criticism"

1

Newton, K. M. "Marxist Criticism." In Twentieth-Century Literary Theory, 85–97. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19486-5_7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kellner, Douglas. "Marxist criticism." In Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory, edited by Irena Makaryk, 95–100. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781442674417-027.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Szeman, Imre. "Marxist Criticism, Then and Now." In Literary Materialisms, 49–62. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137339959_3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Wang, Fengzhen. "Marxist Literary Criticism in China." In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 715–22. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_49.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Venugopal, N. "N. Venugopal: Reflections on Marxist literary criticism in Telugu." In Critical Discourse in Telugu, 197–205. London: Routledge India, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003224761-26.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Chapman, Alison. "‘This Unhappy State of Things’:1 Marxist Literary Criticism and the ‘Social-Problem’ Novel." In Elizabeth Gaskell, 42–81. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-90710-6_4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Bellamy, Brent Ryan. "Literary Criticism." In The SAGE Handbook of Marxism, 807–22. 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529714371.n45.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Jiong, Zhang. "Marxism and Literary Criticism." In Literature and Literary Criticism in Contemporary China, 3–21. London ; New York : Routledge, 2017. | Series: China perspectives: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315708386-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Jiong, Zhang. "Marxism and Literary Studies." In Literature and Literary Criticism in Contemporary China, 22–30. London ; New York : Routledge, 2017. | Series: China perspectives: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315708386-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Jiong, Zhang. "Marxism and the Core Value System of Literary Evaluation." In Literature and Literary Criticism in Contemporary China, 31–36. London ; New York : Routledge, 2017. | Series: China perspectives: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315708386-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Marxist literary criticism"

1

Gao, Yunxia. "Methodology Enlightenments of Contemporary Marxist Literary Criticism on Contemporary Literary Geography Research of Shaanxi." In 2017 2nd International Conference on Education, Sports, Arts and Management Engineering (ICESAME 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icesame-17.2017.71.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Basid, Abdul, M. Faisol, Zahrah Nida' Rosyida Assulthoni, and Muassomah. "Portrait of Pegaten Society in the Novel “Kubah” Based on Marxist Literary Criticism Theory." In Proceedings of the 2nd Internasional Conference on Culture and Language in Southeast Asia (ICCLAS 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icclas-18.2019.57.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!