Academic literature on the topic 'Masters/PhD Scholarship Program (SP)'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Masters/PhD Scholarship Program (SP).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Masters/PhD Scholarship Program (SP)"

1

Almutairi, K., J. Nossent, D. Preen, H. Keen, K. Roger, and C. Inderjeeth. "AB0103 THE ACCURACY OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEALTH DATA FOR IDENTIFYING PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A VALIDATION STUDY USING MEDICAL RECORDS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA." Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 80, Suppl 1 (2021): 1079.3–1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.335.

Full text
Abstract:
Background:The use of large administrative health datasets is increasingly important in Rheumatology for disease trends and outcome research (1). We established the West Australian Rheumatic Disease Epidemiological Registry containing longitudinal health data for over 10000 patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Western Australia (WA). Accuracy of coding for RA is essential to validity of the datasets.Objectives:Investigate the diagnostic accuracy of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) based discharge codes for RA at WA’s largest tertiary hospital.Methods:Medical records for RA patients randomly selected from the hospital discharge database with ICD 10 codes (M05.00–M06.99) from 2008–2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Rheumatologist reported diagnosis and ACR/EULAR classification were used as gold standards to determine positive predictive value (PPV) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for RA primary diagnostic codes.Results:Medical chart review was completed for 87 patients (mean age 64.7 years, 67% female). Total of 80 (92%) patients had specialist confirmed RA diagnoses, while seven patients (8%) had alternate clinical diagnoses providing a PPV of 93.5% (95%CI: 89.9 to 95.86). Overall, 69 out 87 patients (79.3%) fulfilled ACR/EULAR classification criteria based on RA primary diagnostic codes with a PPV of 80.5% (95%CI: 76.81 to 83.7). A combination of a diagnostic RA code with biologic infusion codes in two or more codes increased the PPV to 97.9%.Conclusion:Hospital discharge diagnostic codes in WA identify RA patients with a high degree of accuracy. Combining a primary diagnostic code for RA with biological infusion codes can further increase the PPV.References:[1]Hanly et al. The use of administrative health care databases to identify patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Open Access Rheumatol 2015; 7: 69–75.Table 1.Accuracy measures of different algorithms for random sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with one or more RA codes.Rheumatologist-reported diagnosisACR/EULAR classification criteriaAdministrative dataSNSPPPVNPVSNSPPPVNPVOne or more RA primary codes90%28.5%93.5%7.6%89.8%16.6%80.5%30%One or more RA biological infusion codes25%71.4%90.9%7.7%20.3%55.5%63.6%15.3%Two or more RA codes including biological codes60%85.7%97.9%15.8%56.5%44.4%79.6%21%RA=Rheumatoid Arthritis, SN=Sensitivity, SP=Specificity, PPV= Positive predictive value, NPV= Negative predictive value.Acknowledgements:Khalid Almutairi was supported by an Australian Government research training Program PhD Scholarship at the University of Western Australia.Disclosure of Interests:Khalid Almutairi: None declared, Johannes Nossent Speakers bureau: Janssen, David Preen: None declared, Helen Keen Speakers bureau: Pfizer Australia, Abbvie Australia, Katrina Roger: None declared, Charles Inderjeeth Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Manta, Sofia Wolker, Paula Fabricio Sandreschi, Allana Alexandre Cardoso, et al. "Profile of the graduates of the phd course of the postgraduate program in physical education: a case study at Federal University of Santa Catarina (2006 to 2018)." Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano 22 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e66261.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The aim of the study was to analyze the graduate’s profile of the PhD course in Postgraduate Program in Physical Education (PPPE), Federal University of Santa Catarina. Information from the 92 PhD graduates from 2006 to 2018 was collected from secondary sources of public domain sites. Three independent evaluators filtered the information through double typing. The data revealed that more than 50% of the graduates were male, 58.7% had a scholarship, and 27.8% had a sandwich doctorate in foreign institutions. Only 17.4% of graduates completed postdoctoral training. The highest proportion has employment as effective teachers (73.3%), mainly in public higher education institutions. The concentration themes in the area of Physical Activity and Health (PAH) predominate in the titles of the conclusion work. During the formative trajectory, 48.9% of the graduates changed, at least, once in the concentration area, 44.6% remained in the same area and 6.5% investigated the three distinct concentration areas during undergraduate, masters and doctoral studies. The majority develop PAH (50.0%), followed by Pedagogical (25.5%) and Biodynamics and Human Performance (17.8%). Thus, the doctors training in PPPE seems to design a profile according to the idealized by the course, with professional possibilities of insertion in higher education and engagement in scientific investigations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Singh, Ankur. "868Harnessing new approaches and contemporary methods for better evidence on housing and health." International Journal of Epidemiology 50, Supplement_1 (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyab168.615.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Organisation(s): The Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Healthy Cities at the University of Adelaide, The Australian Institute of Machine Learning. Key contact person: Doctor Ankur Singh Focus and outcomes for participants The symposium will focus on four emerging methods which, because of the complexity and pervasiveness of the concepts housing and health, are highly relevant to progressing new knowledge in the field: New methods will be presented in the context of past and current international research in the field. Presentations will be interactive; embedded within each presentation will be discussion points to engage participants and extend discussion. Rationale for the symposium, including for its inclusion in the Congress A good housing system has the potential to play a key role in preventing poor health, and maximising good health. Much of the epidemiological research on which evidence for action rests however, describes generalised associations and correlations rather than intervention-oriented causal pathways or context appropriate predictions. Why? Housing and health are both complex concepts to measure and understand and the stark differences in the composition of people in less stable and unaffordable types of housing compared to the people considered to be well-housed makes it difficult to measure, let alone compare, health outcomes. Recent advances in methods and conceptual thinking have enabled us to do better at identifying underlying causal pathways generating a body of research that has utilised longitudinal data, fixed effects and hybrid regression analyses and marginal structural models to examine pathways between housing affordability and tenure (including social housing) and mental health. There is more to do however, with developments in methods rapidly occurring alongside greater data availability increasing the scope for causally focussed or more accurately predictive research on housing and health. The main theme of the congress is ‘Methodological Innovation in Epidemiology’ and a subtheme is ‘Translation from research to policy and practice’. Our symposium addresses both these themes. It will present the application of causal inference, machine learning, natural experiments and use of multistate simulation models to generate policy-relevant research for transforming housing policies. Presentation program Introduction and overview of the field, Peter Phibbs (Not confirmed) Peter Phibbs is a geographer, planner and social economist who been undertaking housing research for more than 25 years. He is Head of Urban Planning and Policy at the University of Sydney and Director of the Henry Halloran Trust. His recent research has been on the development of the affordable housing sector in Australia, the role of planning in affordable housing delivery, tenancy issues in remote Indigenous communities as well as the use of shared ownership models to improve affordability outcomes Natural experiments for housing and health, Rebecca Bentley Professor Rebecca Bentley is a Principal Research Fellow in Social Epidemiology in the Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health. Over the past ten years, Rebecca has developed a research program exploring the role of housing and residential location in shaping health and wellbeing in Australia. Machine learning for prediction & precision, Emma Baker Emma Baker is Professor of Housing Research and an ARC Future Fellow. Her work examines the impact of housing and location in urban and regional environments, producing academic, as well as policy-relevant research. Dr Baker's recent publications include analyses of the housing implications of economic, social, and spatial change in Australia, work quantifying health effects of housing tenure and affordability, research on the effects of precarious and vulnerable housing. Opportunities and challenges in using multistate lifetable models for housing interventions, Ankur Singh Ankur is a Lecturer (Epidemiology) and a Research Fellow in Social Epidemiology at the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health. In his current role, Ankur applies advanced quantitative as well as evidence synthesis methods such as multilevel modelling, causal mediation techniques, simulation modelling based on multistate lifetables, and systematic and scoping reviews. Within the Centre for Health Equity, Ankur works collaboratively with a team of researchers interested in quantitative research on Social and Spatial Epidemiology. Key focus areas of the research group include housing related health inequalities, intergenerational health inequalities and urban environments and health. Maximising the research power of longitudinal data, Zoe Aitken (Not confirmed) Zoe Aitken is a research fellow at the Gender and Women's Health Unit at the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health. She has been working at the University of Melbourne since 2011 to pursue her interest in social epidemiology and was awarded an NHMRC postdoctoral scholarship in April 2015. She has a particular interest in the analysis of longitudinal studies to answer causal questions about the complex interplay between socio-economic disadvantage and health. Flexible modelling and effective visualisation, Koen Simons Dr Koen Simons obtained a Masters degree in Physics form the University of Gent and a Masters degree in Statistics from the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, focussing on sparsity and shrinkage estimators. He completed his PhD at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium, performing simulation studies of ensemble methods with applications for short-term health effects of air pollution. He is currently providing biostatistical advise for both clinical trials and epidemiological studies at Western Health and RMIT, and applying causal inference models to problems in health equity. Conclusions and final comments Names of facilitator or chair Rebecca Bentley
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Masters/PhD Scholarship Program (SP)"

1

Silva, Cristina Ribeiro. "O Programa "Bolsa Mestrado/Doutorado" como uma política pública de formação continuada de educadores do Estado de São Paulo: ato e potência." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2011. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/9582.

Full text
Abstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-27T14:30:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cristina Ribeiro Silva.pdf: 1034249 bytes, checksum: de4f8a12dea7438290b6d8728d43669a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-05-18<br>Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior<br>This study is based on the Programa Masters/PhD Scholarship Program, as a continuing education public policy for educators in the State of São Paulo, created in 2003, which grants semiannual scholarships to stricto sensu graduate programs in Education. The scholarships are awarded to public schools teachers and to students in state and private universities accredited by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior Capes (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel). The continuing education policy in which this study is grounded on aims at improving educators practices by developing their profiles and skills as teachers researchers. This qualitative research is based mainly on studies by Nóvoa (1995), Pimenta and Ghedin (2005) in regards to educators training, having employed André (2004) and Lüdke s (2001) propositions regarding Research Professors. Books, the legislation, official documents and field research, held by data collection of the Caieiras Board of Education (SP) scholarship grantees and their Lattes Curriculums, were used as research sources. The dissertation also includes data and information collected from a community in a social network, Orkut ( Masters Scholarship Community), polls and interviews. Statements from Masters and PhDs scholarship grantees and the principal of the school with the largest number os scholarship grantees in the researched Board of Education are the main empirical source of this study<br>Esta pesquisa tem por objeto de estudo o Programa Bolsa Mestrado/Doutorado . Trata-se de uma política pública de formação continuada de educadores do Estado de São Paulo, criada em 2003, que disponibiliza, semestralmente, bolsas de estudos para cursos de Pós-Graduação stricto sensu na área da Educação. Os contemplados são educadores da rede de ensino estadual, discentes de universidades públicas ou privadas reconhecidas pela Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (Capes). A política de formação continuada em foco tem por finalidade promover a melhoria da atuação profissional desses educadores mediante seu desenvolvimento como professores pesquisadores. Esta pesquisa, de caráter qualitativo, apoia-se, sobretudo, nos estudos de Nóvoa (1995), Pimenta e Guedin (2005) no tocante à formação de professores, tendo sido empregadas as proposições de André (2004) e Lüdke (2001), referentes ao professor pesquisador. Como fontes de pesquisa, foram utilizados livros, legislação, documentos oficiais e pesquisa de campo, feita mediante a coleta de dados sobre os bolsistas da Diretoria de Ensino de Caieiras (SP), e em seus currículos lattes. O trabalho contou também com o levantamento de informações na rede social Orkut por meio da comunidade Bolsa Mestrado e com a aplicação de questionários e entrevistas. Os depoimentos dos mestres e doutores bolsistas, e do diretor de escola com maior número de bolsistas da Diretoria de Ensino pesquisada, constituem-se na principal fonte empírica deste trabalho
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rocha, Francisco Antônio Moreira. "A formação e a permanência de professores mestres e doutores nas escolas públicas estaduais de São Paulo: o programa Bolsa Mestrado/Doutorado." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2012. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/9667.

Full text
Abstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-27T14:30:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Francisco Antonio Moreira Rocha.pdf: 2068401 bytes, checksum: 6f9407df1fc775770507416751181ae3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-06-14<br>Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior<br>The purpose of this research has as objective to analyze the contributions and impacts of Masters / PhD Scholarship, from the initial question What is the contribution of the PBM / D and its impact on personal development, professional teachers and professional recovery of basic education by SEE-SP, after completion of graduate studies. We assume the configuration of this research from the documentary analysis and semi-structured qualitative character, the concern is with the quality in the interviewees' statements, as well as documentation. The search for answers to some personal questions in order to explain a professional education with academic education, in addition to that required for a position as teacher of Basic Education II, SEE-SP and that went through one of the types of continuing education through PBM / D, teacher Master or PhD in public schools, found the Internet, the sites of SEE-SP, APEOESP lattes and curricula of Fellows and Board of Education 1 North, documents the laws of the past three decades, records registration form sheets and monthly reports submitted for analysis of the regional commission. As conclusion, we present what we consider relevant in an enterprise investigative searching for answers to the survey answers and points, a potential of PBM / D for personal and professional training, as well as for its recovery as a teacher at the school, with its students, but adds the lack of public policies to enhance the professional teacher and researcher<br>A proposta desta pesquisa possui como objetivo analisar as contribuições e os impactos do Programa Bolsa Mestrado/Doutorado, a partir da questão inicial qual a contribuição do PBM/D e seus impactos no desenvolvimento pessoal, profissional dos professores e a valorização desses profissionais da educação básica pela SEE-SP, após a conclusão da pós-graduação? Assumimos a configuração dessa pesquisa a partir da análise documental e de entrevistas semi-estruturada de caráter qualitativa, onde a preocupação é com a qualidade nas falas dos entrevistados, bem como na documentação. A busca de respostas para algumas indagações pessoais, no sentido de explicitar um profissional de educação com formação acadêmica, além da exigida para ocupar um cargo de Professor de Educação Básica II, na SEE-SP e que passou por uma das modalidades de formação continuada por meio do PBM/D, o professor Mestre ou Doutor, nas escolas públicas. Encontramos respostas na internet, nos sites da SEE-SP, APEOESP e currículos lattes dos bolsistas e na Diretoria de Ensino Norte 1: documentos da legislação das últimas três décadas, registros em forma de fichas cadastrais e relatórios semestrais enviados para análise da comissão regional. Nas considerações finais, apresentamos o que consideramos relevante em uma empreitada investigativa à procura de respostas que a pesquisa responde e aponta um potencial do PBM/D para a formação pessoal e profissional, bem como para a sua valorização na escola, como professor e com seus alunos, mas acrescenta a inexistência de políticas públicas para valorizar esse profissional professor e pesquisador
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography