To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Matrimonial property regimes.
Journal articles on the topic 'Matrimonial property regimes'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Matrimonial property regimes.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Moldovan, Iosif Florin. "Matrimonial Regimes." Journal of Legal Studies 16, no. 30 (December 1, 2015): 47–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jles-2015-0010.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The matrimonial regime represents the entirety of the legal provisions concerning the property relations between spouses during marriage, as well as the legal documents they conclude with other people, governing a (measurable) patrimonial asset. In addition to the legal community regime, with the adoption of the new Civil Code two new matrimonial regimes were introduced, namely the regime of property separation and the regime of the conventional community. Where the two spouses opt for one of the other two regimes, instead of the legal community regime, it is necessary that they should sign a marital agreement.
2
Popescu, Miron Gavril. "PRIMARY MATRIMONIAL REGIME AS REGULATED BY THE CURRENT ROMANIAN CIVIL CODE. MARRIAGE EXPENSES." Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences 9, no. 2 (July 28, 2015): 36–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v9i2.2039.
Full textAbstract:
Renouncing the binding nature of the legal matrimonial regime[1], upon adoption of the new Civil Code, the Romanian lawmaker consecrated the patrimonial freedom of the spouses to decide as they deem appropriate and fit with regard to the property that is the object of their property relations. The New Civil Code establishes the principle of the freedom of choice of the matrimonial regime, the future spouses having the choice to enter, outside the regime of the legal community of property (the only possible matrimonial regime according to the previous regulation of the Family Code), into a matrimonial convention, on the basis of which they shall “join” either the separation of property regime or the conventional community of property regime.Regardless of the matrimonial regime chosen, whether legal or conventional, there is a common core of imperative, non-derogatory rules, which provide a minimal protection of the property relations between spouses.The imperative primary regime is enshrined in the Civil Code in force, in Book II, About Family, Title II – Marriage, Chapter VI – Property Rights and Obligations of Spouses, Section 1 – Common Provisions, Paragraph 1 – About the General Matrimonial Regime (Art. 312-320), Paragraph 2 – The Family Dwelling (Art.321-324), Paragraph 3 – Marriage Expenses (Art.325-328).In this article, the property obligations of the spouses present in the text of the law under the name of Marriage Expenses (Art. 325-328 Civil Code) are the subject of a legal review, highlighting a higher degree of concern on the part of the lawmaker, as compared to the current one, in drafting the Family Code, in terms of their regulation in relation to the accelerated dynamics of social relations.[1] Under the Family Code, which was abrogated with the entry into force of the current Romanian Civil Code, the matrimonial regime of the spouses was that of the community of goods, unique, mandatory and immutable. For development, see Vasilescu, P. Regimuri matrimoniale. Partea generală (Matrimonial Regimes. The General Part), Rosetti Publishing House,Bucharest, 2003, page 258;
3
Carrascosa González, Javier. "Ley aplicable al régimen económico matrimonial. Algunas cuestiones de Derecho transitorio = Applicable Law to matrimonial property regimes. Some issues concerning transitional rules." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 12, no. 1 (March 5, 2020): 456. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5198.
Full textAbstract:
Resumen: El presente trabajo expone las relaciones entre la cuestión de la ley aplicable al régimen económico matrimonial en los casos de Derecho transitorio que han sido puestos de relieve por la jurisprudencia española y en particular por la SAP Barcelona 30 julio 2019. El estudio aborda la eliminación legislativa y jurisprudencia del punto de conexión discriminatorio “nacionalidad del marido”. También se explica la relación entre la teoría de la Drittwirkung y las normas de conflicto de leyes. Se distingue entre los matrimonios celebrados antes del día 29 de diciembre de 1978, los celebrados entre el día 29 de diciembre de 1978 y el día 7 de noviembre de 1990 y los que se llevan a cabo posteriormente. Finalmente, se exponen las razones por las que se aprecia una imparable emergencia de la residencia habitual común inmediatamente posterior a la celebración del matrimonio como punto de conexión para fijar la Ley reguladora del régimen económico matrimonial.Palabras clave: Iey aplicable al régimen económico matrimonial, nacionalidad del marido, Drittwirkung, Derecho transitorio, residencia habitual. Abstract: The present work deals with the law applicable to the matrimonial property regimes and transitional rules. The judgement rendered by the court of appeal of Barcelona on July 30th 2019 in examined. The husband’s nationality as a connecting factor is also studied and proves to be discriminatory and non compatible with the Spanish Constitution. In this scenario, the theory of Drittwirkung shows that the Spanish conflict rules are obviously subject to the Spanish Constitution. A distinction is made between marriages concluded before December 29, 1978, those celebrated between December 29, 1978 and November 7, 1990, and those carried out subsequently is made. Finally, this work analyses the reasons for an unstoppable rise of the common habitual residence after the marriage as a connecting factor to determine the Law applicable to matrimonial property regimes. Keywords: law applicable to the matrimonial property regimes, nationality of the husband’s nationality, Drittwirkung, transitional rules of law, habitual residence.
4
Rodríguez Benot, Andrés. "Los efectos patrimoniales de los matrimonios y de las uniones registradas en la Unión Europea = Property consequences of marriages and of registered partnerships in the European Union." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 11, no. 1 (March 11, 2019): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2019.4612.
Full textAbstract:
Resumen: Desde el 29 de enero de 2019 la mayoría de los países de la UE aplica los Reglamentos 2016/1103 y 2016/1104, de 24 de junio de 2016, sobre los aspectos de Derecho internacional privado de los regímenes matrimoniales y de los efectos patrimoniales de las uniones registradas, respectivamente. Se trata de dos textos extensos y complejos que ofrecen una regulación global o de conjunto de los aspectos de esta materia en supuestos que impliquen repercusión transfronteriza.Palabras clave: Régimen económico matrimonial,e Efectos patrimoniales de las uniones registradas. Reglamentos de la UE 2016/1103 y 2016/1104.Abstract: Since 29th January 2019 most of EU Member States apply Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 concerning Private International Law in matters of matrimonial property regimes and in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships, respectively. Both are long and complex texts that govern comprehensively all issues of those matters having cross-border implications.Keywords: Matrimonial property regimes. Property consequences of registered partnerships. EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104.
5
Sousa Gonçalves, Anabela Susana de. "O princípio da autonomia da vontade no Regulamento Europeu sobre Regimes Matrimoniais." Revista Electrónica de Direito 22, no. 2 (June 2020): 77–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2020-0002_0004.
Full textAbstract:
One of the main structural principles of Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes is the principle of party autonomy, both in terms of conflict-of-laws and international jurisdiction. The purpose of this study is to analyse the implementation of this principle in the European Regulation on Matrimonial Regimes.
6
Alina Oprea, Elena. "Party autonomy and the law applicable to the matrimonial property regimes in Europe = La autonomía de la voluntad y la ley aplicable a los regímenes matrimoniales en Europa." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 10, no. 2 (October 5, 2018): 579. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4390.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: In a private international law context reflecting significant divergences between the objective choice-of-law rules for matrimonial property regimes, the principle of party autonomy appears as a salutary solution, bringing certainty, predictability and simplicity, while satisfying also the spouses’ substantial interests. The study focuses on the rules devoted to this principle by the European legislator in the (EU) Regulation no 2016/1103, attempting to outline its regime and insisting, particularly, on its admissibility and on the limitations that accompany its practical exercise. Providing a sufficient framework for discussion and helping to illustrate the implications of the European text, the rules of the Romanian Civil Code and of the 1978 Hague Convention on the law applicable to matrimonial property regimes will serve as a benchmark.Keywords: matrimonial property regimes, EU Regulation no 2016/1103, autonomy of will, electio juris agreements, states with more than one legal system, change of the applicable law.Resumen: En un contexto de derecho internacional privado que refleja divergencias significativas entre las reglas objetivas de elección de los regímenes matrimoniales, el principio de autonomía de las partes aparece como una solución saludable, aportando certeza, previsibilidad y simplicidad, al tiempo que satisface también los intereses sustanciales de los cónyuges. El estudio se centra en las normas dedicadas a este principio por el legislador europeo en el Reglamento (UE) n. ° 2016/1103, que intenta delinear su régimen e insistir, en particular, en su admisibilidad y en las limitaciones que acompañan a su ejercicio práctico. Proporcionar un marco suficiente para el debate y ayudar a ilustrar las implicaciones del texto europeo, las normas del Código Civil rumano y del Convenio de La Haya de 1978 sobre la ley aplicable a los regímenes matrimoniales de propiedad servirán como punto de referencia.Palabras clave: regímenes económicos matrimoniales, Reglamento (UE) no 2016/1103, autonomía de la voluntad, acuerdo de elección de la ley aplicable, estados con diversos regímenes jurídicos, cambio de la ley aplicable.
7
Mróz, Teresa. "The functions of the spouse’s consent for the legal actions within the statutory matrimonial property regime." Rocznik Teologii Katolickiej 21 (2022): 199–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/rtk.2022.21.10.
Full textAbstract:
The teaching of Father Michał Sopoćko which concerns the legal regulations of marriage remains highly relevant. One of the most important basis of functioning a family is establishing the property security. The Polish legal regulations have evolved over the years, we have witnessed various structures of the statutory matrimonial property regimes. Nowadays, at the moment of contracting marriage the spouses establish the community property (matrimonial joint property) which complies a subordinate role for marriage. To strengthen the protective function of the regime it is necessary to obtain the consent of the other spouse for any statutory legal actions.
8
Limantė, Agnė, and Neža Pogorelčnik Vogrinc. "Party Autonomy in the Context of Jurisdictional and Choice of Law Rules of Matrimonial Property Regulation." Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 13, no. 2 (December 1, 2020): 135–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0014.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In 2019, the EU Member States started applying the Matrimonial Property Regulation, which concerns the property regimes of international marriages. This regulation is aimed at helping couples manage their property and divide it in case of divorce or the death of one spouse. One of the main features of this regulation is its openness to the parties’ choice. The parties are enabled – in cases foreseen in the regulation – to grant jurisdiction to the court of a Member State of their choice, as well as to choose the law applicable to their matrimonial property regime. Since this regulation is new and the track record of its application is rather short, the limits of party autonomy allowed under the regulation and its advantages still involve a high degree of uncertainty. This article provides an in-depth analysis of party autonomy as provided for in the Matrimonial Property Regulation. In addition, it scrutinises the issue of party autonomy in the Succession Regulation, which often directly interacts with the Matrimonial Property Regulation.
9
Nicolae, Ioana. "ASPECTS OF PRIVATE LAW WHICH ARE NOT ENFORCED BY THE REGULATION (EU) No. 650/2012." Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences 9, no. 4 (February 3, 2016): 61–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v9i4.2318.
Full textAbstract:
A novelty element which concerns even Romanian citizens is the enforcement of Regulation (EU) no 650/2012. Although the area of enforcement of the regulation should include all aspect of civil law regarding a deceased person’s patrimony, certain aspects were deliberately left out from the enforcement area of this regulation, as the questions governed by the law of companies or relating to matrimonial property regimes. To illustrate the effects of the death of an associate in a company, we will provide a short comparative presentation of the continuance of the collective society with the heirs of the deceased partner as regulated by Law no 31/1990 regarding Romanian companies as opposed to the French Civil Code. Also, our brief analysis of the Proposal for a Council regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes, may shed some light on what is to come in matrimonial property regimes.
10
Langer-Ostrawsky, Gertrude, and Margareth Lanzinger. "More favored - less favored? Women and men in different marital property right systems: A comparative study of marital property rights in the Habsburg Empire during the 18th century." Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger 44 (October 14, 2005): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/fof.v44i3.132987.
Full textAbstract:
Our paper focuses on several central points concerning pre-nuptial negotiations, the results of which were finalized in marriage contracts.There are two opposing systems of the law governing marital property regimes: the regime of matrimonial community of property or joint marital property, Gütergemeinschaft, and the regime of separation of marital property, Gütertrennung We compare two territories of the Habsburg Empire – the County of Tirol with the regime of separation of marital property dominating, and the Archduchy of Austria South of the River Enns (Lower Austria), with matrimonial community of property dominating in rural areas. For each territory, we concentrate on a single landed estate: Fridau-Weißenburg in the case of Lower Austria, and Innichen in the case of Tirol. Innichen was a small market town with a mixed economy based on agriculture and the trades; while the estate of Fridau-Weißenburg was more rural and agricultural and also preindustrial since the middle of the 18th century.
11
Żarnowiec, Łukasz. "WSPÓŁCZESNE TENDENCJE W ZAKRESIE METOD WYZNACZANIA PRAWA WŁAŚCIWEGO DLA MAŁŻEŃSKICH STOSUNKÓW MAJĄTKOWYCH." Zeszyty Prawnicze 14, no. 4 (December 5, 2016): 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2014.14.4.05.
Full textAbstract:
Current Trends in the Conflict of Legal Methods in Matrimonial Property RegimesSummaryThe difficulties relating to the determination of the law applicable to personal and property relations between spouses are one of the most significant barriers to the free movement of individuals between different countries. Due to the importance of matrimonial property regimes for the situation of third parties entering into legal relations with married persons, matrimonial property regimes also have a seminal impact on the security of free movement and exchange. This article presents an analysis of conflict-of-law methods used to determine the law applicable to matrimonial property relations under selected conflict-of-law regulations adopted in different countries, the proposed uniform European regulation, and the former Polish International Private Law Act (Ustawa o prawie prywatnym międzynarodowym) of 1965. It also contains an assessment of the relevance of new conflict-of-law rules that have been introduced at the national level. The article may be regarded as a background for the analysis of the arrangements presented in the new Polish International Private Law Act of 2011, which will be presented in a separate issue of this journal.
12
Poretti, Paula. "Odlučivanje o imovinskim odnosima bračnih drugova u ostavinskim postupcima sukladno Uredbi 2016/1103 o bračnoimovinskom režimu." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 38, no. 1 (2017): 449–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.38.1.16.
Full textAbstract:
Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes (hereinafter: Regulation 2016/1103) provides for uniform rules which should facilitate delivering of judgments concerning matrimonial property in cross-border disputes in 18 Member States which established enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of the property regimes of international couples. The application of the Regulation 2016/1103 should contribue to the application of other european instruments in the fi eld of european family law in divorce and succession proceedings. The paper presents rules on jurisdiction and applicable law under the Regulation 2016/1103 which should be applied in proceedings concerning matrimonial property regimes. Application of the provisions of Regulation 2016/1103 on jurisdiction and applicable law in proceedings for succession will be analyzed. The paper elaborates on certain potentially problematic solutions and open issues revealed through interpretation of provisions of Regulation 2016/1103 which could cause doubts and uncertainties for the court and public notaries. Possible solutions which could remove diffi culties and insuffi ciencies in the application of the Regulation 2016/1103 will be suggested.
13
Grieco, Cristina. "The role of party autonomy under the regulations on matrimonial property regimes and property consequences of registered partnerships. Some remarks on the coordination between the legal regime established by the new regulations and other relevant instruments of European Private International Law = Il ruolo dell’autonomia della volontà nei regolamenti sui rapporti patrimoniali tra coniugi e sugli effetti patrimoniali delle unioni registrate. Alcune considerazioni sul coordinamento tra il regime giuridico stabilito dai nuovi regolamenti e altri strumenti di diritto internazionale privato europeo." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 10, no. 2 (October 5, 2018): 457. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4384.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: The new Regulations (No. 2016/1103 and No. 2016/1104) recently adopted through an enhanced cooperation by the European Legislator aim to deal with all the private international law aspects of matrimonial property regimes and property consequences of registered partnerships, both as concerns the daily management of matrimonial property (or partner’s property) and its liquidation, in particular as a result of the couple’s separation or the death of one of the spouses (or partners). This paper aims to address the prominent role of party autonomy in the two Regulations and to focus on the coordination between the legal system embodied in the new two Regulations, and other relevant instruments of European private international law in force, such as the Succession Regulation and the Bruxelles II- bis Regulation.Keywords: party autonomy; successions; matrimonial property regime, partnership property regime, applicable law, choice of law, private international law.Riassunto: I due nuovi regolamenti (No. 2016/1103 e No. 2016/1104), recentemente adottati nell’ambito di una cooperazione rafforzata dal legislatore europeo, si propongono di regolare tutti gli aspetti internazional privatistici legati ai regimi patrimoniali tra coniugi e alle conseguenze patrimoniali delle partnership registrate, sia per ciò che concerne la regolare amministrazione dei beni sia per ciò che riguarda la liquidazione degli stessi beni facenti parte del regime matrimoniale (o della partnership registrata) nel caso si verifichino vicende che ne alterino il normale svolgimento, come la separazione della coppia o la morte di uno degli sposi (o dei partner). Il presente scritto si propone di esaminare il ruolo prominente che, all’interno di entrambi i regolamenti, è riservato alla volontà delle parti e di focalizzarsi sul coordinamento tra i due nuovi strumenti e gli altri regolamenti di diritto internazionale privato europeo attualmente in vigore e, particolarmente, il regolamento sulle successioni transfrontaliere e il regolamento Bruxelles II- bisParole chiave: autonomia della volontà; successioni; rapporti patrimoniali tra coniugi; effetti patrimoniali delle unioni registrate; legge applicabile; scelta di legge; diritto internazionale privato.
14
Mota, Helena. "Autonomia jurisdicional no direito internacional privado europeu dos regimes matrimoniais." Revista Electrónica de Direito 33, no. 1 (2024): 147–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2024-0001_0007.
Full textAbstract:
Neste trabalho pretendemos analisar o regime dos artigos 7.o e 8.o do Regulamento dos Regimes Matrimoniais (Regulamento (UE) 2016/1103). Discutiremos a autonomia jurisdicional oferecida pelo Regulamento i.e, quando e em que condições os cônjuges poderão celebrar pactos de jurisdição em questões relativas ao património conjugal. Nessa sequência, discutiremos criticamente alguns problemas e dúvidas interpretativas suscitadas pelo teor destas regras.
15
Quinzá Redondo, Pablo. "Spanish Matrimonial Property Regimes and CEFL Principles Regarding Property Relations between Spouses." European Journal of Law Reform 17, no. 2 (June 2015): 329–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5553/ejlr/138723702015017002010.
Full text
16
López García-Rocha, María del Pilar. "El impacto en la función registral del Reglamento (UE) 2016/1103 sobre los regímenes económico matrimoniales." Anales de Derecho 40, no. 2 (December 28, 2023): 1–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesderecho.586101.
Full textAbstract:
Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 June 24th, 2016 establishes enhanced cooperation in the field of jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of rulings on matrimonial property regimes came into force since January 29th, 2016. Despite excluding real rights and registration in the Property Registry from its scope of application, it has an important impact on the registry function related to marital economic regimes, as it is intended to demonstrate in this article. El Reglamento (UE) 2016/1103, de 24 de junio de 2016, por el que se establece una cooperación reforzada en el ámbito de la competencia, la ley aplicable, el reconocimiento y la ejecución de resoluciones en materia de regímenes económico matrimoniales, en vigor desde el 29 de enero de 2019, pese a excluir de su ámbito de aplicación derechos reales e inscripción en el Registro de la Propiedad, tiene un importante impacto en la función registral relativa a los regímenes económico matrimoniales, tal y como se intenta demostrar en este trabajo.
17
Frémeaux, Nicolas, and Marion Leturcq. "Prenuptial agreements and matrimonial property regimes in France, 1855–2010." Explorations in Economic History 68 (April 2018): 132–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2017.10.004.
Full text
18
Robinson, JA. "Matrimonial Property Regimes and Damages: The Far Reaches of the South African Constitution." Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 10, no. 3 (July 4, 2017): 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2007/v10i3a2800.
Full textAbstract:
Section 18(b) of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 allows for non-patrimonial damages to be claimed by a spouse married in community of property against his/her spouse. In Van der Merwe v Road Accident Fund 2006 4 SA 230 (CC) the court extended this exception to the notional purity of community of property to include patrimonial damages on the basis that section 18(b) discriminated unfairly against spouses married in community of property vis-à-vis spouses married out of community. The implications of this decision on commercial intercourse are discussed in this contribution against the background of prior decisions relating to the insolvency of spouses married in community of property.
19
Barzó, Tímea. "From Marital Property Law To Family Property Law : Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Property Law Regulations Protecting Families." Law, Identity and Values 1, no. 1 (2021): 23–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.55073/2021.1.23-39.
Full textAbstract:
Although the legislator prefers the institution of marriage and accepts it as a form of family relationship, the system of family relationships has altered as a result of social changes, which can also be seen in the legal regulation. Therefore, the framework of previous thinking, which is almost exclusively based on matrimonial property rights, has been modified by the social and economic changes and the consequent constant change in regulation and attitudes. As a result, not only matrimonial property regimes but also the legal relationship between persons living in a registered partnership or de facto partnership, and their relationship with third parties are covered by matrimonial property law as well. Consequently, it is necessary to apply a new comprehensive terminology to these property relations, which is family property law. However, it can also be stated that during the development of the family property regulation, the legislator sought to incorporate guarantees into the system during the analysis of the diversity of family relationships, which prevented the endangerment of family existence, the vulnerability of the weaker partner or the rights of minors belonging to the family. However, most of the protecting provisions in the family property law apply to persons living in a marriage (registered partnership), the property relations of de facto partners are less regulated, and they contain only partially, or under certain circumstances family protection standards, legal consequences, and safeguards. The reason of this is that the legislature protects and favours marriage in principle over the other two legally regulated forms of partnership, by which it encourages young people and couples to marriage which requires mutual responsibility, solidarity, and commitment.
20
Tkachenko, Ye. "MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIMES OF SALARIES, PENSIONS AND SCHOLARSHIPS IN THE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW." Innovative Solution in Modern Science 7, no. 43 (December 27, 2020): 80. http://dx.doi.org/10.26886/2414-634x.7(43)2020.6.
Full textAbstract:
As a result of the study and analysis of scientific sources of the private international law and legislation regulating property relations between the spouses, the author implemented the goal of the article, i.e. theoretical comprehension and determination of the legal regime of salaries, pensions and scholarships of spouses in the private international law on the basis of available scientific material and relevant provisions of the regulatory legal acts of some states. While writing the article, the author used a universal dialectical method of cognition which allows taking into account the relationship between and interdependence of legal phenomena; general scientific (systemic, logical, historical, analytical) methods; as well as private scientific (comparative juridical and formal juridical) approaches. Accordingly, the author concluded that salaries, pensions and scholarships become the common property of spouses from the moment they are received by the eligible spouse. This point of view is considered to be the most spread in the private international law.Key words: matrimonial property regime, property relations, property rights, salary, pension, scholarship.
21
Żarnowiec, Łukasz. "KOLIZYJNOPRAWNA PROBLEMATYKA MAŁŻEŃSKICH STOSUNKÓW MAJĄTKOWYCH W ŚWIETLE PRZEPISÓW NOWEJ USTAWY O P.P.M. Z 2011 R." Zeszyty Prawnicze 15, no. 1 (December 5, 2016): 77. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2015.15.1.04.
Full textAbstract:
Conflict of Legal Issues Regarding Matrimonial Property Regimes under the New Private International Law of 2011SummaryThe conflict-of-law method for the determination of the law applicable to matrimonial property regimes under the Polish InternationalPrivate Law Act of 1965 became obsolete and no longer came up tocurrent standards and needs, and therefore required thorough revision.The most important shortfalls of the previous regulation were theexclusion of freedom of choice of the law applicable to matrimonialproperty relations, the selection of criteria recognised as objectiveconnecting factors, the excessive privilege of lex fori, and the lack ofinstruments protecting third parties entering into legal relations witha married couple.Amendments in the above-mentioned scope were introduced by theInternational Private Law Act of February 4, 2011 (Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 2011 r. – Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe), that came into forceon May 16, 2011. However, certain provisions of the new Act haveraised doubts. This paper presents them and tries to provide a criticalassessment.
22
Válková, Lenka. "The interplay between jurisdictional rules established in the EU legal instruments in the field of family law: testing functionality through simultaneous application with domestic law = L’interazione tra le regole di giurisdizione all’interno degli strumenti giuridici dell’UE nell’ambito del diritto di famiglia: la prova del funzionamento attraverso l’applicazione simultanea del diritto nazionale." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 9, no. 2 (October 5, 2017): 551. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2017.3886.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: The following article aims at testing the interrelations between the rules on: jurisdiction in divorce and parental responsibility laid down in the Brussels IIa Regulation, maintenance laid down in the Maintenance Regulation, and property regime laid down in the Regulation on Matrimonial Property Regimes and on Property Consequences of Registered Partnerships, considering a number of potentially seised Member State courts and their interactions with domestic law. For the testing, the national legal system and case law of Slovakia and Czech Republic, which require hearing of a dispute in unique proceedings (with certain differences), has been selected in order to tackle problems connected with the simultaneous application of rules established by the EU regulations and domestic procedural rules.Keywords: Multiplicity of Regulations in Family Matters, Interplay between Jurisdictional Rules, Divorce, Parental Responsibility, Maintenance, Matrimonial Property Regimes, Czech and Slovak Legislation.Riassunto: Il presente contributo mira a verificare l’interazione tra le norme sulla competenza in materia di divorzio e responsabilità genitoriale stabilite dal Regolamento Bruxelles IIa, in materia di obbligazioni alimentari previste nel Regolamento sulle Obbligazioni Alimentari, e in materia di regimi patrimoniali previsti dai Regolamenti in Materia di Regimi Patrimoniali fra Coniugi e di Effetti Patrimoniali delle Unioni Registrate, prendendo in considerazione le Corti degli Stati Membri potenzialmente adite e la loro interazione con il diritto interno. Al fine di testare il funzionamento e affrontare i problema legati all’applicazione simultanea delle norme stabilite dal diritto dell’UE e delle norme procedurali nazionali, sono stati scelti i sistemi giuridici della Slovacchia e della Repubblica ceca, che richiedono, con alcune differenze, l’audizione di una controversia in un unico processo.Parole chiave: molteplicità dei regolamenti in diritto di familia, interazione tra le norme sulla competenza, divorzio, responsabilità genitoriale, obbligazioni alimentari, regime patrimoniale, legislazione ceca e slovacca.
23
Thijs, Hannelore. "The Franco-German Common Optional Matrimonial Property Regime: A Guide for Future European Harmonization." European Review of Private Law 29, Issue 3 (July 1, 2021): 489–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2021025.
Full textAbstract:
In 2010, France and Germany introduced a common optional matrimonial property regime of participation in acquisitions in both countries. One of its goals was to establish European harmonization, up until then a rare occurrence in the broad field of family law. The harmonization journey was continued by Belgium in 2018, when the Franco-German agreement was taken over in the Belgian Civil Code. This article evaluates the Franco-German regime from both an internal and an external point of view in order to determine the success of this operation. In the internal analysis, the regime will be presented as a modern and balanced compromise between the French and German domestic participation in acquisition regimes. In the external analysis, the regime will be qualified as a legal transplant in Belgium that at this moment in time does not survive the operation. Despite this seemingly negative evaluation, the regime may still increase its success rate, provided all actors involved take the required measures. In any case, the regime should be welcomed as harmonization initiative, considering that new projects may learn from its successes as well as from its stumbling blocks.
24
Słyk, Jerzy. "Podział majątku wspólnego małżonków po ustaniu ustroju małżeńskiej wspólności majątkowej." Prawo w Działaniu 44 (2020): 25–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.32041/pwd.4402.
Full textAbstract:
The article discusses the results of a case file study conducted in cases concerning community property of spouses after cessation of the matrimonial community property regime. First of all, the authors present Polish nationwide statistics concerning the numbers of cases of this kind compared to other types of property division cases and in the context of contractual modification of marital property regimes. An analysis of results of the case file study covered the problems of assets covered by the division, the kinds of claims formulated by spouses, the course of court proceedings, including: the initial stage, evidentiary proceedings, final decision, and appeal against the judgment. One of the most important and, at the same time, most surprising findings made during the study concerned a considerable number of settlements made at early stages of court proceedings. Combined with the low number of mediations or appeals against the final judgment, this demonstrates that the examined cases were not very contentious.
25
Valentová, Lucia. "Property Regimes of Spouses and Partners in New EU Regulations – Jurisdiction, Prorogation and Choice of Law." International and Comparative Law Review 16, no. 2 (December 1, 2016): 221–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iclr-2016-0026.
Full textAbstract:
Summary There are millions of international couples living and working in the EU. Not a small number of those face difficult time when their marriage or partnership comes to an end. On top of dealing with loss, the couples have to navigate through a lot of administrative and legal obstacles to figure out the division of their property located in different Member States or governed by different national law. These proceedings are lengthy and expensive. European Commission, aware of the issue their citizens face, introduced two proposals for regulations on matrimonial property and property of registered partners. In 2013 the proposals did not get the required unanimity, in 2016 they are being re-introduced in enhanced cooperation.
26
Sonnekus, JC. "Regspraak: Huweliksgoedereregtelike bedeling lukraak terugwerkend gewysig én die betrokkenes se handelingsbevoegdheid só verminder?" Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg 2023, no. 1 (2023): 140–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/tsar/2023/i1a9.
Full textAbstract:
Legal certainty will be severely jeopardised should it be possible at whim to proclaim the applicable matrimonial property regime governing spouses’ assets and liabilities to have been changed retroactively. The legislature prescribed clearly defined prerequisites to be met before any change regarding a couple’s matrimonial property regime can be sanctioned by the high court and then only for the future, but never with retrospective force. Under the dualistic systems that apply in South Africa since 1652 it has always been recognised that individuals living according to customary or indigenous law may by default govern their matrimonial property regimes and the law of husband and wife according to the applicable norms of indigenous law. By default these marriages were out of community of property although a couple could agree to change the default position and have their consensus in this regard registered. The couple M was married according to customary law in the erstwhile Eastern Cape in 1980 and the marriage was never registered. The default position should accordingly govern the matrimonial property regime of the couple resulting in no community of property and no accrual system. The husband’s legal capacity and competencies were consequently not restricted by the qualifications contained in section 15 of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 because that chapter of the act was not applicable to a customary marriage concluded in 1980 and which is by default out of community of property. When the husband as registered sole owner in 2010 entered into a valid sale agreement to transfer his immovable property on the Cape Flats to the first respondent nothing hampered or restricted the parties’ capacity to enter into the applicable obligatory or real agreements. The property was subsequently validly transferred in the Deeds Register to the purchaser. The plaintiff’s claim as widow of the seller who since passed away, to have the property “retransferred” into her name because the sale and transfer was allegedly in contravention of section 15 of Act 88 of 1984, is unconvincing although the court held otherwise. The crux of the matter is not whether the first respondent should be safeguarded against the consequences of an alleged invalid agreement by the husband who acted without the involvement of his wife in 2010 by a reliance on section 15(9)(a) of that act. The emphasis should have been on how the alleged amendment of section 7(2) of Act 120 of 1998 in June 2021 could be deemed to apply retrospectively after the sale and transfer had validly been concluded for eleven years before the poorly formulated amendment of the act became law in June 2021. A contract of sale that was validly concluded cannot retrospectively become invalid because the legislature changed the requirements for the type of contract more than a decade later. The court’s point of departure for its judgment is, however, that the deceased was married in community of property: “The Recognition of Customary Marriages Amendment Act 1 of 2021, which came into operation on 1 June 2021, among others, amended section 7 of the RCMA that all marriages, which were entered into before or after the enactment of the RCMA, are regarded as in community of property unless such consequences are specifically excluded by the spouses in an antenuptial contract” (par 20). This, notwithstanding the clear legal position regarding the default matrimonial property regime for all indigenous marriages concluded before the commencement of Act 120 of 1998: out of community of property. The legislature was supposed to adhere to the decision of the constitutional court in 2017 in Ramuhovhi v President of the Republic of South Africa (2018 2 SA 1 (CC)) to amend section 7(1) of Act 120 of 1998 with regard to polygamous marriages and not to alter the legal position regarding monogamous marriages that were governed without any found negative consequences by section 7(2) of that act. Although the legislature neglected to explicitly declare that this amendment of section 7(2) should have no impact retrospectively, the implications of this poorly conceived judgment will necessitate a re-opening of all the millions of estates of people who have been married according to a customary marriage since 1652 because all those marriages will now be deemed to have been in community of property with the consequential implications for the distribution of all assets of the spouses involved with the dissolution of the marriages after the demise of the dying spouse. The legislature would have caused less harm if it read with comprehension the clear order of the constitutional court: “In terms of s 172(1)(b) of the Constitution, this order does not invalidate a winding up of a deceased estate that has been finalised or the transfer of marital property that has been effected.”
27
Ncube, Welshman. "Re-Allocation of Matrimonial Property at the Dissolution of Marriage in Zimbabwe." Journal of African Law 34, no. 1 (1990): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855300008159.
Full textAbstract:
Most countries of the world have at one time or another been confronted with questions of what principles or rules should guide the courts in readjusting the property rights of spouses at the dissolution of their marriage. Virtually all civilised countries have accepted marriage as an equal partnership of two legally equal individuals to which each one of them contributes in one way or another. Most policy makers agree that the partners contribute to the marriage through their division of labour and that these contributions although not equal in absolute terms are nonetheless of equal relative value to the welfare of the family.This recognition of the equal worth and equal importance of the two spouses to a marriage relationship has had profound effects on the matrimonial property regimes of numerous countries which have had to tackle the problem of the construction of a fair and equitable legal formula for the reallocation of matrimonial property rights at the dissolution of marriage. The fundamental problem has been whether a fair and equitable system is achieved by means of fixed rules of apportionment or through flexible discretionary judicial powers exercisable at the discretion of courts, in the light of the individual circumstances of each case.
28
Garriga Suau, Georgina, and Christopher A. Whytock. "Choice of law for immovable property issues: new directions in the European Union and the United States." Revista española de derecho internacional 74, no. 1 (January 25, 2022): 81–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.17103/redi.74.1.2022.1b.01.
Full textAbstract:
In both the European Union and the United States, it is a dynamic period for private international law regarding immovable property issues. The predominant approach has been that these issues are governed by the lex rei sitae —that is, the law of the State where the immovable is located. However, through a comparative examination of recent EU Regulations on succession, matrimonial property regimes, and the property consequences of registered partnerships, and of the new Third Restatement of Conflict of Laws project in the United States, this article shows that on both sides of the Atlantic there is a trend toward reducing the scope of the lex rei sitae rule. It explores both the reasons for and the challenges posed by this trend. It also reveals that despite this trend, the lex rei sitae rule nevertheless persists in relation to certain «core» immovable property issues.
29
Sánchez-Moraleda, Ana Moreno. "Las normas de conflicto del Reglamento de la Unión Europea 2016/1103 sobre regímenes económicos matrimoniales: normas materialmente orientadas." Revista Electrónica de Direito 18, no. 1 (February 28, 2019): 1–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2019-0001_0005.
Full textAbstract:
El Reglamento de la Unión Europea (UE) nº 2016/1103 sobre regímenes económicos matrimoniales, unifica las normas de conflicto entre los Estados miembros participantes en la cooperación reforzada. En el presente estudio se analizan los distintos puntos de conexión para determinar la ley aplicable: elección limitada de ley por los cónyuges, ley de residencia habitual o nacionalidad de los cónyuges como leyes más próximas, así como la ley de vínculos más estrechos o la ley de última residencia habitual de los cónyuges como clausula de excepción. Todas estas leyes aplicables a los efectos patrimoniales del matrimonio, persiguen un determinado resultado material, como consecuencia, comprobaremos que este Reglamento europeo tiene el acierto de establecer normas de conflicto materialmente orientadas frente al funcionamiento neutral de las tradicionales normas de conflicto de los Estados.
30
Sisák, Ľuboslav. "Smart marriage contracts." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 42, no. 3 (2021): 657–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.42.3.4.
Full textAbstract:
This paper is intended to serve as an introductory treatise on the subject of smart marriage contracts (SMC) as a manifestation of blockchain in matrimonial property law of contracts. It starts with a description of the origin and functioning of an SMC from a technical standpoint, while evaluating the legal nature thereof at the same time. Afterwards, we focus on the possibilities and means of an SMC’s establishment under German, Austrian, and Slovak law. Moving on, issues related to the content of a marriage contract establishing an SMC are examined. Then it is tested the permissibility of an SMC-related provision in a marriage contract referred to as a “registration clause”. Finally, it is delved into the question whether the appearance of an SMC in a marriage contract introduces any peculiarities to issues of private international law, namely from the perspective of the EU Regulations on property regimes of international couples.
31
Puelinckx-Coene, Mieke. "La Protection des Differents Membres de la Famille par le Droit Familial Patrimonial en Europe." European Review of Private Law 12, Issue 2 (April 1, 2004): 143–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2004013.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract:In spite of largely different techniques in family property law of the many European countries in protecting family members (continental Europe has well structured matrimonial property regimes and a reserved portions in the estate of the deceased, which both are nearly unknown in Anglo-Saxon law), the author discovers similar trends in the pursued objectives: upgrading the succession status of the surviving spouse at the expense of the rights of the blood family and abolition of the discrimination of children born out of wedlock. Those trends should be encouraged. Few are the countries granting some protection to the ‘recent family members’ like the surviving unmarried partner and the children of a ‘recomposed family’, not affiliated to the deceased. The author is in favour of a pan-European equilibrated solution with more respect for the possible wish of the deceased to protect these recent members or to guarantee them a reasonable minimum protection in the absence of any provision by the deceased if they need it.
32
Nel, Eben. "Estate Planning and Wills Across Borders: Sometimes a Quagmire in the Making." Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 24 (October 13, 2021): 1–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a8396.
Full textAbstract:
In this article a synoptic evaluation is made in respect of the estate planning and wills of South African nationals working, investing or living in foreign jurisdictions, in the broader context of globalisation and internationalisation. Estate planners and testators may inadvertently leave family members in a financially vulnerable position or diminish family assets due to a non-appreciation of international private law. The importance of international wills, the role of testamentary trusts, and the potential impact and reciprocity of international instruments are considered. The most applicable Hague Conventions and the EU Succession and Matrimonial Property Regulations are discussed in an attempt to give an overview of the current legal position. In discussing the role of international private law, its practical application is illustrated by way of reference to a few jurisdictions popular among South Africans with multi-jurisdictional estates, namely Malta, Portugal, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Although there may be more popular emigration jurisdictions amongst South Africans, this contribution focusses on the South African who lives, works and plays in a European context, without necessarily cutting his or her ties with the homeland. Not all attempts to harmonise wills, deceased estates, succession and matrimonial property regimes have been met with the same levels of enthusiasm by the international community. Contributing hereto may be the fact that fiduciary law deals with sensitive and very personal aspects of individuals and is closely linked to the different worldviews of communities. It is argued that not only fiduciary advisers and will drafters, but also attorneys and notaries involved with prenuptial agreements, should be proficient in the workings and implications of the applicable international instruments. Lastly, an argument is made for more pragmatic and commercial style thinking in the arena of fiduciary law.
33
Tarska, Monika. "Umowy między małżonkami dotyczące praw udziałowych w spółkach kapitałowych." Studia Prawnicze / The Legal Studies, no. 5 (December 31, 2018): 83–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.37232/sp.2018.5.3.
Full textAbstract:
Zagadnienia statusu prawnego osób pozostających w związku małżeńskim i objętych wspólnością majątkową małżeńską jako uczestników spółek handlowych, zwłaszcza kapitałowych, wywołują w praktyce obrotu prawnego wiele kontrowersji. Zarówno kodeks spółek handlowych jak i przepisy kodeksu rodzinnego i opiekuńczego regulujące reżimy majątkowe małżeńskie nie zawierają szczególnego unormowania skutków prawnych nabycia (objęcia) praw udziałowych w spółkach przez małżonków, lub przez jednego z nich, a zwłaszcza przynależności tych praw do określonego majątku małżonków – wspólnego bądź osobistego. Wobec tych osób stosowane są mają więc zastosowanie ogólne przepisy k.s.h. o obejmowaniu / nabywaniu praw wspólnika spółki (praw udziałowych). Obowiązuje również ogólna zasada ustawowego małżeńskiego reżimu majątkowego wyrażona w art. 31 § 1 k.r.o. Omawiane w artykule zagadnienie ujawnia szerszy problem, powstający na styku prawa rodzinnego oraz prawa spółek, polegający na ustaleniu relacji prawnej między umowami majątkowymi małżeńskimi a umową spółki (czy szerzej: relacji przepisów prawa spółek handlowych do prawa rodzinnego), a w konsekwencji wpływu i skuteczności postanowień intercyzy – umowy między osobami, z których jedna ma status osoby trzeciej wobec spółki – na skład osobowy spółki: organizacji prywatnoprawnej, której ustrój współkształtowany jest postanowieniami umowy spółki. The issues of the legal status of married persons and co-members of marital property as participants in commercial companies, especially capital companies, cause a lot of controversy in the practice of legal transactions. Both the Commercial Companies Code and the provisions of the Family and Guardianship Code regulating matrimonial property regimes do not contain any specific provisions for the legal effects of the acquisition (taking up) of participation rights in companies by spouses or by one of them, and especially the belonging of these rights to specific property of the spouses – joint or personal. Therefore, the general provisions of the Code of Commercial Companies and Partnerships apply to these persons. on taking or acquiring the rights of a partner of the company (share rights). The general rule of the statutory matrimonial property regime, expressed in Art. 31 § 1 Family and Guardianship Code. The issue discussed in the article reveals a wider problem arising at the interface between family law and company law, consisting in establishing the legal relationship between a marriage contract and the partnership agreement (or more broadly: the relationship between the provisions of commercial companies law and family law), and consequently the impact and effectiveness of – contracts between persons, one of which has the status of a third party to the company – for the personal composition of the company: a private-law organization whose structure is co-shaped by the provisions of the company’s articles of association.
34
Dorabialska, Anna. "Limitations on the Choice of Law Resulting from the Protection of Third Parties in the Polish System of Private International Law." International and Comparative Law Review 19, no. 1 (June 1, 2019): 294–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0061.
Full textAbstract:
Summary The article concerns the limitations of the freedom of shaping the legal relationship by the parties on the grounds of private international law binding in Poland. It is devoted to the specific issue of limitations of the effects of the choice of law on the grounds of the protection of third parties. The rules related to this issue have been included both in the sources of European law (“Rome I” and “Rome II” regulations, as well as in the Polish law – Private International Law of 2011). They concern the choice of law for contractual and non-contractual obligations, for a power of attorney and for matrimonial property regimes. The purpose of these rules is to protect the knowledge of a third party or the rights acquired by them. The article considers various possibilities to exclude the effectiveness of a law chosen for the protection of a third party, while respecting the wills of the parties to the legal relationship as much as possible.
35
Iglesias Buigues, José Luis. "La remisión a la ley española en materia sucesoria y de régimen económico matrimonial = The reference to Spanish law in matters of succession and matrimonial economic regime." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 10, no. 1 (March 8, 2018): 233. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4122.
Full textAbstract:
Resumen: El presente artículo aborda la problemática, doctrinalmente nada pacífica, que origina la designación de la ley española en el ámbito de las sucesiones mortis causa y del régimen económico matrimonial como consecuencia de la regulación de ambas materias, respectivamente por los Reglamentos (UE) 650/2012 y 2016/1103 y el sistema que estos instrumentos ordenan –el mismo en ambos– para la determinación de la ley aplicable cuando se trate de un Estado plurilegislativo, que es el caso de España. Habida cuenta de que el sistema de designación de la ley aplicable en el conflicto de leyes interno parte del principio de unidad de soluciones, esto es, de la aplicación a los conflictos internos de las mismas normas que se aplican a los internacionales, formalmente ubicadas, en su mayor parte y, en concreto, en las materias que nos ocupan, en el Capítulo IV del Título Preliminar del Código civil, una parte significativa de la doctrina española especializada argumenta que son las normas de Derecho Internacional privado allí recogidas –y no otras– a las que se refiere el sistema interno querido por el legislador español, aun cuando, en el caso concreto de dichas materias, hayan sido eliminadas y sustituidas por las establecidas en los citados Reglamentos. En este artículo, tras una valoración crítica de esta posición doctrinal, se llega a una interpretación distinta, si bien coincidiendo con la anterior en la necesidad urgente de que el legislador español modifique el vetusto sistema de conflicto de leyes interno para adaptarlo a las realidades de los nuevos tiempos.Palabras clave: Sucesiones y régimen económico matrimonial, Reglamentos (UE) 650/2012 y 2016/1103, remisión a la ley de un Estado plurilegislativo, conflictos de leyes internos e internacionales.Abstract: This article deals with the non-pacific question of the application of the Spanish law in cases of succession and matrimonial property regimes given the content of the new Regulations (EU) 650/2012 and 2016/1103 and specifically taking into account how they deal with territorial multi-unit States, as it is the case of Spain. Given the fact that the application of Spanish law follows the principle of “unity of solutions”, i.e. the application of the same set of rules for both for international and merely and purely interregional cases –dispositions contained in Chapter IV of the Preliminary title of the Spanish civil Code–, some authors consider that some of these latter rules are still applicable despite they have been amended by the European legislator. The article critically analysis this doctrinal position and considers there is a better way for interpretation. However, both of them consider the necessity of a new system of internal conflict-of-law rules drafted by the Spanish legislator and given the new and current scenario.Keywords: Succession and matrimonial economic regime, Regulations (EU) 650/2012 and 2016/1103, referral to the law of a plurilegislative State, conflits of domestic and international laws.
36
Qisheng, He. "Chronology of Practice: Chinese Practice in Private International Law in 2020." Chinese Journal of International Law 20, no. 3 (September 1, 2021): 581–623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmab031.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This survey contains materials reflecting the practice of Chinese private international law in 2020. First, regarding changes in the statutory framework of private international law in China, three legislative acts, one administrative regulation on the Unreliable Entity List and ten judicial interpretations of the Supreme People’s Court were adopted or amended in 2020 on a wide range of matters, including conflict of laws, punitive damages, international civil procedure, etc. Second, 11 typical cases involving Chinse courts’ jurisdiction are selected to highlight the development in Chinese private international law, involving standard essential patents, abuse of market dominance, declaration of non-infringement of patent, asymmetric choice of court agreement and other matters. Third, nine cases on choice of law questions relating, in particular, to habitual residence, rights in rem, matrimonial property regimes and ascertainment of foreign law, are examined. Fourth, five cases involving anti-suit injunction or anti-enforcement injunction are reported and one introduced in detail. Fifth, the first occasion for on international judicial assistance of extracting DNA, as well as three representative cases on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, are discussed. The Statistics of international judicial assistance cases in China is first released in this survey. Finally, this survey also covers five recent decisions illustrating Chinese courts’ pro-arbitration attitude towards the uncertainty brought about by contractual clauses referring to both litigation and arbitration.
37
O, Seog-Ung. "Trends in European International Private Law relating to the Effect of Marriage - Council Regulation(EU) on the matrimonial property regimes and the German International Private Law(EGBGB) -." Korea Private International Law Journal 26, no. 1 (June 30, 2020): 237–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.38131/kpilj.2020.06.26.1.237.
Full text
38
Kudeikina, Inga. "THE PHENOMENON OF MARRIAGE IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT." SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference 6 (May 20, 2020): 647. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol6.4841.
Full textAbstract:
The marital relationship has been changing over time. The institution of marriage has become more democratic, following societal development. Marriage and divorce have lost their bureaucratic and moral obstacles. However, marriage has retained its role in the welfare of spouses and the evolution of society. Law protects the moral and economic rights of spouses. It should be noted, however, that the safeguarding of spouses’ rights and interests a priori concerns the rights and interests of third parties. This is the phenomenon of marriage. In a legal relationship, spouses are recognised as special right holders by default, which refers, for example, to insolvency proceedings, matrimonial property regimes and social rights. The research analyses the correlation between the trends of the institution of marriage and third-party rights in the context of the welfare of society. The objective of the research is to analyse the institution of marriage in order to trace its development in the modern world and establish how it affects third-party rights and public interests in general. The research employs methods of legal interpretation to analyse legislation and the inductive and deductive method to draw conclusions and formulate suggestions. Based on the results of the research, the institution of marriage is undergoing transformation. Marriage is losing its initial importance. Unmarried cohabitation is becoming increasingly prevalent. The biggest challenge is to balance the right to self-determination of a person choosing cohabitation and the public interest in legal stability and predictability, which are essential for the sustainable development of society.
39
Fötschl, Andreas. "The COMPR of Germany and France: Epoch-Making in the Unification of Law." European Review of Private Law 18, Issue 4 (August 1, 2010): 881–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2010065.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: France and Germany adopted a Common Matrimonial Property Regime in January 2010. Spouses can elect to have the new regime applied which combines French and German principles of matrimonial property. It is open for access to all the Member States of the European Union. The new regime can be relevant even in States that have not chosen to adopt it, when the parties could have opted for French or German law and preferred to choose the new regime. This bilateral cooperation in family law could be followed by further initiatives, as well in other fields of law. Résumé: La France et l’Allemagne ont conclu, en janvier 2010, un traité sur le régime matrimonial de la participation aux acquêts. Le nouveau régime est optionnel et devrait combiner des principes français et allemands de droit des régimes matrimoniaux. Les autres Etats de l’Union européenne sont invités à adhérer à la convention. Les époux des Etats non-adhérents ou d’autres Etats pourront aussi choisir le nouveau régime, si le droit international privé applicable leur permet d’opter pour le droit français ou le droit allemand. Cette coopération bilatérale en droit de famille pourrait suivie par de nouvelles initiatives dans d’autres branches du droit. Zusammenfassung: Frankreich und Deutschland haben im Januar 2010 ein gemeinsames Regime für das Ehegüterrecht beschlossen. Das neue Regime kann von den Ehegatten gewählt werden und soll französische und deutsche Grundsätze des Ehegü-terrechts verbinden. Das neue Regime steht Mitgliedsstaaten der Europäischen Union zum Beitritt offen. Auch ohne Beitritt und für andere Staaten kann das neue Regime Bedeutung erlangen, wenn die Parteien französisches oder deutsches Recht wählen konnten und für das neue Regime optiert haben. Dieser bilateralen Zusammenarbeit im Familienrecht könnten weitere Kooperationen auch in anderen Rechtsbereichen folgen.
40
Rademacher, Lukas. "Changing the past: retroactive choice of law and the protection of third parties in the European regulations on patrimonial consequences of marriages and registered partnerships = Cambiando el pasado: elección retroactiva de la ley aplicable y protección de terceras partes en los reglamentos europeos sobre los efectos patrimoniales de los matrimonios y de las uniones registradas." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 10, no. 1 (March 8, 2018): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4112.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: Two forthcoming EU Regulations are going to address, inter alia, the law applicable to the patrimonial consequences of marriages and registered partnerships. Under the Regulations, spouses and partners will not only be able to choose the applicable law but they are also granted the right to give their choice of law retroactive effect. Although the patrimonial consequences of marriages and partnerships are of relevance primarily to the spouses and registered partners, they may also directly affect the legal position of third parties. The aim of this paper is to identify and analyze the risks for third parties inherent in a retroactive change of the applicable law and the measures implemented in the Regulations to safeguard third party interests.Keywords: matrimonial property regime, partnership property regime, applicable law, choice of law, retroactivity, third parties.Resumen: Dos Reglamentos europeos regirán, entre otras cosas, la ley aplicable a los efectos patrimoniales de los matrimonios y de las uniones registradas. Según los Reglamentos, los cónyuges y los miembros de la unión además de poder elegir la ley aplicable tienen la posibilidad de dotar esta elección de efecto retroactivo. Aunque los efectos patrimoniales de los matrimonios y de las uniones registradas tienen relevancia ante todo para los cónyuges y los miembros de la unión registrada, pueden afectar directamente a la posición jurídica de terceras partes. El objetivo de este artículo es identificar y analizar los riesgos para terceros inherentes a un cambio retroactivo de la ley aplicable y las medidas implementadas en los Reglamentos para salvaguardar los intereses de terceras partes.Palabras clave: régimen económico matrimonial, efectos patrimoniales de las uniones registradas, ley aplicable, elección de la ley aplicable, retroactividad, terceras partes.
41
Moreno Sánchez-Moraleda, Ana. "Las cuestiones del régimen matrimonial primario y la aplicación del Reglamento 2016/1103 = The questions of the primary matrimonial regime and the application of Regulation 2016/1103." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 12, no. 1 (March 5, 2020): 259. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5189.
Full textAbstract:
Resumen: estudio sobre las cuestiones que se plantean entre los cónyuges, con distinta nacionalidad, domicilio o residencia, o cuando sus bienes se hallan en el extranjero (o los acreedores o deudores son extranjeros), respecto a sus derechos y deberes esenciales una vez contraído matrimonio, y con independencia del régimen pactado o legal, cuando se aplica el Reglamento 2016/1103 por los órganos jurisdiccionales o autoridades de los Estados participantes en la cooperación reforzada. Se presentan fundamentalmente problemas en relación con la ley aplicable, debido a que, conforme a este Reglamento europeo, el régimen matrimonial primario pudiera ubicarse dentro de las normas imperativas (considerando 18), que funcionan como límite a priori de las normas de conflicto. No obstante, nos preguntamos si no sería más adecuado considerar el contenido de las normas que regulan estos derechos y deberes esenciales del matrimonio, para que pueda operar el orden público como límite a posteriori.Palabras clave: el matrimonio internacional, el régimen primario, las normas imperativas, el orden público.Abstract: presentation of the questions that arise between married couple with different nationality, domicile or residence, or when their property is abroad (or the creditors or borrowers are foreigners), with respect to their essential rights and duties upon marriage, and regardless of the agreed or legal regime, when Regulation 2016/1103 is applied by the courts or authorities of the States participating in the enhanced cooperation. Problems mainly arise in relation to the applicable law, since, under this European Regulation, the primary matrimonial regime could fall within the imperatives rules (statement 18), which function as a priori limit on conflict rules. However, we wonder whether it would not be more appropriate to consider the content of the rules governing these essential rights and duties of marriage, so that public order can operate as a posteriori limit. Keywords: the international marriage, the primary regime, the imperatives rules, the public order.
42
Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, Neža. "Applicable law in matrimonial property regime disputes." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 40, no. 3 (2020): 1075–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.3.5.
Full textAbstract:
2016/1103 od 24. lipnja 2016. o provedbi pojačane suradnje u području nadležnosti, mjerodavnog prava te priznavanja i izvršenja odluka u stvarima bračnoimovinskih režima. Dolazi se do zaključka da je nova europska Uredba olakšala bračnim drugovima određenje mjerodavnog prava te se vrednuje primjerenost povezujućih čimbenika predviđenih u Uredbi. Rad dovodi u pitanje te povezujuće čimbenike u trenutku zaključenja braka i pretpostavlja da ih je teško isključiti u izvanrednim okolnostima. Ti se čimbenici uspoređuju s onima iz teorije slovenskog i hrvatskog međunarodnog privatnog prava, a u radu se nude praktični primjeri za razlike proizašle iz novog europskog uređenja. U radu se nadalje istražuje hipoteza da će mogućnost sporazuma o izboru mjerodavnog prava u praksi prouzročiti probleme te se za to nude moguća rješenja. U cijelom se radu uspoređuje sustav uveden Uredbom Vijeća (EU) 2016/1103 s drugim europskim uredbama i relevantnom sudskom praksom Suda Europske unije, ali se autorica ponajviše usredotočuje na promjene koje je navedena Uredba donijela u slovensko i hrvatsko pravo.
43
Grainer, Virginia, and Bob Dugan. "Family Business Interests under the Matrimonial Property and Companies Legislation An Introduction." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 30, no. 1 (June 1, 1999): 237. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v30i1.6020.
Full textAbstract:
This article is a preliminary investigation of family business interests under the Matrimonial Property Act 1976 ('MPA') and the Companies Act 1993 ('CA'). This article introduces the reader to the interrelationship of the matrimonial property regime and the legislative regulation of business entities, focusing on the implications of the MPA for the choice of entity, source of finance, division of shares, and allocation of management responsibility. Two principal lessons emerge from the authors' analysis: first, as applied to family ventures, the business entities legislation provides extensive flexibility with its ample allowance for contractual autonomy; and secondly, the matrimonial property regime is unsuitable for family structures involving a business operation. The authors conclude that the current regime for unmarried separate property, accessible by a MPA agreement under s 21, operates in a far more predictable manner and better suits the interests of many spouses.
44
Rodríguez Rodrigo, Juliana. "Reglamento 2016/1103, a propósito del comentario de la Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona, de 7 mayo 2019 = Regulation 2016/1103, with occasion of commentary of the Judgment of the Appeal Court of Barcelona, 7th May 2019." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 12, no. 1 (March 5, 2020): 679. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5214.
Full textAbstract:
Resumen: En la sentencia objeto de comentario, la AP de Barcelona aplica el artículo 9.2 CC para determinar la ley rectora del régimen económico del matrimonio de una pareja de diferente nacionalidad. Por las circunstancias del caso, la conexión concurrente es la tercera del precepto mencionado del CC. Hemos aprovechado el comentario de esta sentencia para analizar la normativa aplicable por los jueces españoles, en materia de competencia judicial internacional y de ley aplicable, en los dos escenarios siguientes que hemos planteado. Por un lado, hemos supuesto que la demanda se interpone después del 29 de enero de 2019 y que el matrimonio se ha celebrado también después de esa fecha. En esta situación, la normativa aplicable sería el Reglamento 2016/1103, tanto para determinar la competencia judicial como para concretar el Derecho aplicable. Por otro lado, analizamos el supuesto real del caso objeto de comentario, cual es, que la demanda se ha planteado antes del 29 de enero del 2019 y que el matrimonio se celebró también antes de ese momento. En este contexto, el juez español debió haber aplicado la LOPJ, para saber si tenía competencia en el caso, y efectivamente aplicó el artículo 9.2 CC, en el sector de la ley aplicable. Esto último, porque podemos deducir de los datos del caso, que la pareja no ha realizado capitulaciones matrimoniales.Palabras clave: régimen económico del matrimonio, artículo 9.2 Código Civil español, artículo 22 quáter c) LOPJ, Reglamento 2016/1103.Abstract: IIn the judgment object of comment, the Appeal Court of Barcelona applies article 9.2 Spanish Civil Code to determine the law of the matrimonial property regime related to a different nationality couple. Due to the circumstances of the case, the concurrent connection is the third of the mentioned precept. We have taken advantage of the commentary of this judgment to analyze the legal framework applicable by Spanish judges, regarding international jurisdiction and applicable law, in the following two contexts. On the one hand, we have assumed that the action is brought after January 29, 2019 and that the marriage has also been held after that date. In this situation, the Regulation 2016/1103 would be applicable, both to determine international jurisdiction and to specify the applicable law. On the other hand, let’s analyze the real assumption of the case under review, which is that the lawsuit was brought before January 29, 2019 and that the marriage was also held before that time. In this context, the Spanish judge should have applied the internal production text, to know if he had jurisdiction in the case, and the Spanish judge applied article 9.2 Spanish Civil Code, in the sector of the applicable law. In this last case, because we can deduce the data of the case, that the couple has not established a matrimonial property agreement.Keywords: matrimonial property regime, article 9.2 Spanish Civil Code, article 22 quáter c) LOPJ, Regulation 2016/1103.
45
Azcárraga Monzonís, Carmen, and Pablo Quinzá Redondo. "Cambio de apellidos y otros efectos derivados de la disolución del vínculo matrimonial. Comentario de la sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Granada (Sección 5ª) núm. 319/2017, de 14 de septiembre = Change of family names and other effects derived from the dissolution of the marriage. Comment on the judgment of the Spanish Court of Appeal of Granada (Section 5) number 319/2017 of 14th september." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 10, no. 2 (October 5, 2018): 802. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4402.
Full textAbstract:
Resumen: Cambio de apellidos de la esposa tras disolución del vínculo matrimonial, así como otros efectos derivados de la misma, no identificándose ni aplicándose correctamente la normativa de Derecho internacional privado aplicable el caso.Palabras clave: cambio de apellidos, disolución del vínculo matrimonial, menores, alimentos, efectos patrimoniales del matrimonio.Abstract: This case deals with the change of the family name of a wife after the dissolution of her marriage as well as other effects derived from that dissolution. The judgment seems not to identify or apply properly the Private international law rules governing the different matters involved in this case.Keywords: change of family names, dissolution of marriage, minors, maintenance claims, matrimonial property regime.
46
Tarikanov, Dmitry V. "The Conflict of Characterisation of Matrimonial Property and Maintenance Obligations in Private International Law." Zakon 19, no. 7 (July 2023): 178–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.37239/0869-4400-2023-20-7-178-196.
Full textAbstract:
The famous conflict of characterisation in private international law which is its central topic has gained special relevance nowadays in European private international law. The reason is the entry into force of the Hague protocol of 2007 about the maintenance obligations and the Regulation of the European Union of 2016 about the matrimonial property. In both these documents was consciously left open the question about borderline between the liquidation of the regime of matrimonial property and the maintenance obligations in favour to the former spouse. As a result the court has received a certain margin of appreciation when assessing from the point of view of the conflict of laws the property claims of one of the spouses to the other. Taking into consideration that the liquidation of the regime of matrimonial property is submitted in the Pan-European conflict of laws to the immutable statute of matrimonial property which is fixed to the date of the celebration of the marriage and the maintenance obligations are submitted to the law of the actual habitual residence of the needy spouse, the old seemingly purely theoretical issue leads to practical consequences for the married couples with foreign element divorcing nowadays in the European Union.
47
Cigno, Alessandro. "The Economics of Marriage." Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 12, Supplement (May 2011): 28–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2516.2011.00355.x.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractIn a separate-property jurisdiction, marriage may induce domestic cooperation, and enhance efficiency in the production of children, because it may lend credibility to the prospective main earner’s promise to compensate the main childcarer at some future date, when the children will no longer be economically dependent on them. In a community-property jurisdiction, marriage will induce domestic cooperation, and enhance efficiency in the production of children, because it rules out strategic behavior. Whatever the matrimonial property regime, reducing the cost or difficulty of obtaining a divorce will have no permanent effect on the divorce rate. In separate-property jurisdiction, it will encourage marriage, and induce more married women to specialize in market work. Couples should be allowed to choose the matrimonial property regime.
48
Fraboni, Romina, and Agnese Vitali. "Gender Differences in Couples' Matrimonial Property Regime in Italy." Journal of Marriage and Family 81, no. 4 (April 24, 2019): 885–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12574.
Full text
49
Rodríguez Rodrigo, Juliana. "El fuero del Baylío, a propósito del comentario de la sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Badajoz, de 18 enero 2019 = The “fuero del Baylío”, with occasion of commentary of the judgment of the Appeal Court of Badajoz, 18th January 2019." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 11, no. 2 (October 1, 2019): 747. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2019.5017.
Full textAbstract:
Resumen: La Audiencia Provincial de Badajoz ha vuelto a pronunciarse sobre la aplicación del Fuero del Baylío, en esta ocasión, en relación con una pareja con vecindad civil en Valencia del Ventoso (Badajoz). La sentencia reitera, una vez más, la vigencia y aplicabilidad de esta institución de Derecho consuetudinario foral.Palabras clave: Fuero del Baylío, régimen económico matrimonial, régimen de comunidad universal de bienes, régimen de sociedad de gananciales, derecho consuetudinario, derecho foral, costumbre.Abstract: The Appeal Court of Badajoz has returned to pronounce on the application of the Fuero del Baylío, on this occasion, in relation to a couple with civil vicinity in Valencia del Ventoso (Badajoz). The judgement afirms, once more time, the validity and applicability of this institution.Keywords: Fuero del Baylío, matrimonial property regime, universal community property regime, community property regime, customary law, foral law, custom.
50
Attah, Michael. "Divorcing Marriage from Marital Assets: Why Equity and Women Fail in Property Readjustment Actions in Nigeria." Journal of African Law 62, no. 3 (September 19, 2018): 427–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855318000207.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractApplicable statutes give Nigerian courts discretion to achieve fairness in marital property readjustment. Ironically, the courts’ approach has often been to adjudicate on the basis of formal title, resulting in a general failure to make any readjustments. This article offers two alternative explanations for this judicial behaviour: absence of a specific statutory marriage-centred definition of matrimonial property; and the courts’ failure to appreciate the implicit matrimonial property regime revealed by a perspicacious interpretation of the statutes. These factors lead the courts to exercise a title-finding jurisdiction instead of an adjustive one. This conservative approach results in the courts exercising an exclusionary prescription of property. These flaws ignore the socio-cultural underpinnings and environment of marriage that support patriarchy in Africa and generally “disable” women in relation to property rights. Sample court cases support this thesis and underscore the need for a statutory definition of matrimonial property, with marriage as its denominator.