Academic literature on the topic 'McCormick, Richard A., Christian ethics'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'McCormick, Richard A., Christian ethics.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "McCormick, Richard A., Christian ethics"

1

MacIntyre, Alasdair. "The Privatization of Good: An Inaugural Lecture." Review of Politics 52, no. 3 (1990): 344–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500016922.

Full text
Abstract:
Alasdair MacIntyre was installed in 1989 as the first occupant of the McMahon/Hank Chair in Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. On April 18, 1990, he delivered his inaugural lecture, “The Privatization of Good,” before a large and appreciative audience in Notre Dame's Center for Continuing Education. He invited three Notre Dame colleagues to comment on his presentation: Donald P. Kommers, Professor of Law and Government, and Editor of The Review of Politics; William David Solomon, Associate Professor of Philosophy; and Richard McCormick, S.J., John A. O'Brien Professor of Christian Ethics. The following pages include the inaugural address, the remarks of two of the three commentators, and Professor Maclntyre's response. The editors wish to thank Professor MacIntyre for his cooperation in publishing his inaugural address.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Keenan, James F. "Making Sense of Eighty Years of Theological Ethics." Theological Studies 80, no. 1 (February 27, 2019): 148–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040563918819819.

Full text
Abstract:
This article surveys all the contributions in ethics on these pages over the past eighty years and is divided into four historical parts: the first three years; the years from 1943 to 1964; the years Richard McCormick wrote from 1964 to 1984; and the years beyond McCormick. It surveys a period from neo-Scholastic manualism at the eve of World War II to the contemporary era, where methods for attaining moral objectivity are complex. This survey notes shifts in theological method, the movement of the center from the personal to the social, the transition from an exclusively clerical authorship to a much broader array of authors, and a shift in readership from priest confessors to professional theologians.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gallagher, John A. "Is There a Christian Ethics?Lucien Richard." Journal of Religion 69, no. 4 (October 1989): 610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/488261.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Allsopp, M. E. "Deontic and Epistemic Authority in Roman Catholic Ethics: The Case of Richard McCormick." Christian Bioethics 2, no. 1 (March 1, 1996): 97–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cb/2.1.97.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Thomasma, David C., and Erich H. Loewy. "Exploring the Role of Religion in Medical Ethics." Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5, no. 2 (1996): 257–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180100007015.

Full text
Abstract:
From time to time medical ethicists bemoan the loss of a religious perspective in medical ethics. The discipline had its origins in the thinking of explicitly religious thinkers such as Paul Ramsey and Joseph Fletcher. Furthermore, many of those who contributed to the early development of the discipline had training in theology. One thinks of Daniel Callahan, Richard McCormick, Albert Jonsen, Sam. Banks. As the discipline becomes more and more self-reflective, with attention being paid to methodological and conditional concerns, it is only natural that the roots are due for a reexamination. The time has therefore come for some reassessment. The first steps here are taken in the form of a dialogue between the coauthors to clarify authentic contributions and weed out unauthentic ones.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Gehman, Heidi. "Character, Choices, and Community: The Three Faces of Christian Ethics. Russell B. Connors, Jr. , Patrick T. McCormick." Journal of Religion 81, no. 1 (January 2001): 163–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/490805.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

PARIS, JOHN J. "Harmless Error and Other Forays into Bioethics." Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11, no. 4 (August 29, 2002): 353–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180102114083.

Full text
Abstract:
How does a self-described “simple teacher of religion” at the College of the Holy Cross get involved in bioethics? Nothing in my training or experience had prepared me for involvement in medicine. Much like that of my moral theology professor and then mentor, Richard McCormick, my training was in moral theology and social ethics. I also had an abiding interest in the courts and constitutional law. That interest led to a doctoral dissertation at the University of Southern California's Program in Social Ethics on “The Supreme Court's Understanding of Religion in Conscientious Objector Cases.” Interestingly, doctoral work in the late 1960s on the ethical dimension of war was the starting point for other ethicists such as Leroy Walters and James Childress who subsequently became early voices in bioethics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Huber, Wolfgang. "Why ethics?" STJ | Stellenbosch Theological Journal 1, no. 1 (July 31, 2015): 151. http://dx.doi.org/10.17570/stj.2015.v1n1.a7.

Full text
Abstract:
In this address, the author explores the necessity of ethical reflection on our moral responsibility regarding the challenges of today’s globalized world and the future of humankind in the midst of God’s creation. In this context, the differentiation of modern ethics is seen as accompanied by the task to reintegrate the ethical discourse by means of an interdisciplinary exchange and to further especially the dialogue between theological and philosophical ethics. By agreeing on Hans-Richard Reuter’s characterization of theological ethics, the author sees no shortcoming in its recourse to the Christian ethos but a representation of the general case that there is no such a thing as an ethics without position. Putting its emphasis on the element of self-transcendence of the human person in his or her relations of responsibility is what marks theological ethics as specifically “theological”. That includes an understanding of the human person as a relational and communicative being, and of theological ethics as an integrative ethics of responsibility.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

ZAMULINSKI, BRIAN. "Christianity and the ethics of belief." Religious Studies 44, no. 3 (August 4, 2008): 333–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412508009426.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe ethics of belief does not justify condemning all possible forms of religion even in the absence of evidence for any of them or the presence of evidence against all of them. It follows that attacks on religion like the recent one by Richard Dawkins must fail. The reason is not that there is something wrong with the ethics of belief but that Christian faith need not be a matter of beliefs but can instead be a matter of assumptions to which the faithful person is committed. It follows that Christianity can be compatible with scientific rationality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Schäfer, Heinrich. "»We gonna bin laden them!«." Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik 51, no. 3 (August 1, 2007): 169–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.14315/zee-2007-0303.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Actual armed conflict develops to a large extent as »New Wars« (Kaldor, Münkler). Meanwhile traditional peace ethics address either the global/regional or the local level, the dynamicss of New Wars and the according peace building strategies of »peace constituencies« (Lederach) create a new »glocal« (Robertson) field of action. The challenge for Christian peace ethics is now to find a third way between universalistic and communitarian approaches. In this essay the author proposes a »methodological communitarianism« that roots in Bourdieuian sociology and philosophical thinking of Michael Walzer and Richard Rorty. It connects »thick« morals to »thin« principles in the peace constituenties’ task to build bridges between mutally excluding morals. Thus, it is suitable to model Christian peace ethics for this specific new challenge
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "McCormick, Richard A., Christian ethics"

1

Keyes, Patrick Albert. "Richard A. McCormick, SJ, pastoral moral theologian." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1996. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Morgan, Richard H. "Proportionalism and realism in Christian ethics a possibility for common ground in Catholic and Reformed moral methodology as suggested in the writings of Richard McCormick and Reinhold Niebuhr /." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1992. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Landau, Christopher. "A theology of disagreement." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2017. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:41a1c20e-64ea-45af-8582-fff22c956b7c.

Full text
Abstract:
Even the most casual contemporary observer of Christianity must recognise that the notion of Christian community being identifiable through the mutual love of its members (John 13:35) is difficult to reconcile with the schismatic reality of current ecclesial life, dominated in the public sphere by divisive debates on matters such as gender or sexuality. Given the constant presence of disagreement throughout the church’s history, it remains an ethical subject neglected by scholars. This study examines how New Testament texts might inform Christian approaches to disagreement. It is the first systematic consideration of disagreement as a New Testament theme; it follows, and critiques, the methodological approach of Richard Hays in The Moral Vision of the New Testament. The context is public disagreement among Christians: how the church speaks in public when facing its inevitable disagreements, and what theological and ethical concerns might inform how this speech proceeds. The thesis is in three parts. Part One is an examination of the New Testament in relation to disagreement, following Hays' 'descriptive task'. In Part Two, the 'synthetic' and 'hermeneutical' tasks of Hays' methodology are critiqued and some modifications are proposed; a theology of disagreement that emerges from the New Testament is outlined. Part Three considers some ecclesiological implications of this theology of disagreement. Following Hays' 'pragmatic task', it examines how moral theological insights from the New Testament interact with the life of the contemporary church. Illustrative examples consider the church's public theological witness, its pneumatology, and its liturgy, to demonstrate the need for a Christian ethic to engage with extra-Biblical authority with greater enthusiasm than Hays. The thesis concludes by affirming the particular value of reading the New Testament in pursuit of ethical wisdom, but without excluding insights from tradition, reason and experience. The challenge for the church is identified as a move Towards Loving Disagreement; an integral part of its mission is to disagree Christianly.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hedlund, Simon. "Revisiting and re-evaluating same-sex sexual acts in Christian ethics – four evaluations and a suggestion." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Teologiska institutionen, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-295732.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper investigates three questions; how an exegetically sound basis for a biblical ethics concerning same-sex sexual acts might be construed, what role the Bible, and other sources of ethical insight, should play in construing Christian ethics, and what a Christian ethic founded on the answers to those questions would say concerning same-sex sexual acts today. To perform these investigations, the hermeneutical issue regarding biblical texts, as well as the relation between revelatory and non-revelatory ethical sources within Christian ethics, is discussed, and the construed Christian ethics concerning same-sex sexual acts and sexuality of Lisa Sowle Cahill, Samuel W. Kunhiyop, Richard B. Hays, and Peter Coleman are evaluated before a suggestion is presented. That suggestion states that a sound exegetical basis demands a historical-critical reading that aims at understanding the language agreement between first recipients and author(s). It also claims that it is the perspective of the text that should be in focus in forming biblical ethics. Further, it is suggested that the Bible should be considered as having a unique role in Christian ethics by means of supplying a unique perspective on other sources for ethics, as well as on the insights of Scripture itself. This perspective is based on revelation, and should be formed from the central Scriptural notion of imitatio Dei/Christi. The Bible should also be recognized as a unique source of Christian ethical insight. However, an awareness of the impossibility of perfect understanding of Scripture opens the need for a dialog with other sources of ethical insight, such as experience, tradition, and secular reason, through which they are able to play a role in construing Christian ethics. Finally, the Christian ethics concerning same-sex sexual acts holds such acts to be in need of a discriminating division between good and bad; those that are performed within a loving and caring relationship and those that are not. The former are tentatively commended based on an understanding of the clearly encouraged homosocial love they might result of, as well as positive human experience, while the latter are vehemently condemned because of their damaging nature to one or both of the people involved.
Uppsatsen undersöker tre frågor; hur en god exegetisk grund för en biblisk etik angående samkönade sexuella handlingar kan utformas, vilken roll Bibeln och andra källor till etisk insikt ska ha i utformandet av kristen etik, och hur en kristen etik baserad på svaren på dessa två frågor skulle se på samkönade sexuella handlingar idag. För att undersöka dessa frågor kommer hermeneutiska frågor angående bibeltexter likväl som relationen mellan uppenbarelsebaserade och icke-uppenbarelsebaserade källor till etisk insikt inom kristen etik att diskuteras. De konstruktioner av kristen etik angående samkönad sexualitet som gjorts av Lisa Sowle Cahill, Samuel W. Kunhiyop, Richard B. Hays och Peter Coleman utvärderas också innan ett eget förslag presenteras. Det förslag som sedan presenteras menar att en god exegetisk grund kräver en historisk-kritisk läsning som söker förstå den språkliga överenskommelse som fanns mellan ursprunglig(a) mottagare och författare. Förslaget menat också att det är textens perspektiv som ska vara i fokus i utformandet av en biblisk etik. Vidare föreslås det att Bibeln ska anses ha en unik roll i utformandet av kristen etik genom att den erbjuder ett unikt perspektiv på andra etiska källor och på Skriten själv. Detta perspektiv är baserat på uppenbarelse, och bör utformas utifrån den i Skriften centrala idén om imitatio Dei/Christi. Bibeln bör också erkännas som en unik källa till kristen etisk insikt. En medvetenhet om det omöjliga i att nå perfekt förståelse av Skriften öppnar dock upp för behovet av en dialog med andra källor till etisk insikt, källor såsom erfarenhet, tradition, och sekulärt förnuft, genom vilken dessa källor kan spela en roll i konstruktionen av kristen etik.Den kristna etiken angående samkönade sexuella handlingar menar slutligen att det måste göras en skarp skillnad mellan bra och dåliga handlingar av det slaget; de som utförs inom en kärleksfull relation, och de som inte utförs inom en sådan. De förstnämnda är försiktigt lovordade i egenskap av att resultera från en klart uppmuntrad homosocial kärlek, liksom till följd av positiva mänskliga erfarenheter, medan de senare är kraftfullt fördömda på grund av deras skadliga natur i relation till en av de, eller båda, inblandade
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Torrance, David Alan. "Christian kinship : relatedness in Christian practice and moral thought." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2017. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/269744.

Full text
Abstract:
Ideas of kinship play a significant role in structuring everyday life, and yet kinship has been neglected in Christian ethics, as well as moral philosophy and bioethics. Attention has been paid in these disciplines to the ethics of ‘family,’ but little regard has been paid to the fact that kinship is not a given, but is culturally contingent. The thesis seeks to remedy the neglect in recent Christian theological ethics by drawing on resources from the history of Christian thought and practice. It uses social anthropology both to unsettle the accounts of kinship used in Christian ethics, and to expose elements in Christian traditions of thought and practice relating to kinship. Notions of shared bodily substance, the house, gender and personhood recur cross-culturally in giving shape to kinship. By examining these four notions as they inform Christian thought and practice, a theological account is developed. Chapters dedicated to each of these four attempt to provide, in the first instance, a descriptive account of how the notion has structured Christian thought and practice in relation to kinship. Each chapter then turns, in the second instance, to a critical mode, offering a theological treatment of the chapter topic as it bears on kinship. The thesis concludes that kinship in Christ should be considered normatively primary for the Christian, but also that there are ways in which Christians have honoured this kinship in Christ by organising and playing out kinship on a smaller scale. In detailing the distinctively Christian organising principles that structure some practices of kinship ‘in miniature,’ another common practice – the special privileging of the blood tie in structuring kinship – is singled out for critique.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Getz, Andrew W. "The role of Christian faith in public moral discourse a comparison of selected work from H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., Stanley Hauerwas, and Richard A. McCormick /." 2006. http://etd1.library.duq.edu/theses/available/etd-11272006-123031/.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hill, T. Patrick. "Reproductive technologies confront traditional ethics : the capacity of Richard A. McCormick's reformulated natural law ethic to meet the challenge /." 2002. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3048389.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Vinson, Christopher Archie. "Using scripture in Christian ethics: Interacting with Richard Hays's "The Moral Vision of the New Testament"." Thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10392/498.

Full text
Abstract:
One of the fundamental issues at the core of evangelical ethical debates involves the use of Scripture. Rejecting historical-critical methods on the one hand, and simplistic prooftexting on the other. Richard Hays wrote The Moral Vision of the New Testament in order to deal with this very problem. By most accounts, Hays's approach succeeds. This dissertation explores the method proposed by Hays in The Moral Vision , seeking to locate the strengths of his approach while noting its primary weaknesses. Upon finding Hays's method wanting, the dissertation posits a constructive proposal, in conversation with Hays, for using Scripture in ethics. The first chapter of the dissertation introduces the problem and suggests The Moral Vision as an ethical text which has garnered sufficient accolades as to make it worthy of examination. Chapter 2 seeks to describe in detail the major lines of argument, giving specific attention to the method Hays proposes to use Scripture in ethics. Chapter 3 offers a critique of The Moral Vision , beginning with several strengths. The thrust of the chapter, however centers on the following four weaknesses of Hays's method: first, Hays's program of appropriating Scripture is built on his view that Scripture speaks in disunity; second, that view of the canon necessitates that Hays identify three focal images to locate a coherent moral voice. The focal images serve to develop, despite Hays insistence to the contrary, a canon within the canon; third, Hays gives priority to narrative in his system, which opens his method up to greater subjectivity and personal bias; and lastly, Hays's approach provides no criteria for judging whether an appropriation is faithful, it unwittingly relies on transcendent ethical principles, and it fails to distinguish between interpretation and application. After offering a critique of The Moral Vision , chapter 4 proposes an original method for appropriating Scripture in ethics. That proposal seeks first to establish foundational convictions regarding Scripture and ethics. Building on those presuppositions, the dissertation prescribes how one might rightly read the ancient text of Scripture and from there draw conclusions about how the Bible gives ethical instructions today. At every turn, the dissertation's interest is concerned primarily with methodology rather than specific ethical conclusions. The chapter closes by drawing conclusions about one contemporary ethical issue ( in vitro fertilization) in order to test the method prescribed and help the reader see how such a proposal might proceed. The final chapter proposes application for the church that arises from the method proposed by this dissertation. The chapter also raises tensions for further research which lay outside the scope of this dissertation's purposes.
This item is only available to students and faculty of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. If you are not associated with SBTS, this dissertation may be purchased from http://disexpress.umi.com/dxweb or downloaded through ProQuest's Dissertation and Theses database if your institution subscribes to that service.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "McCormick, Richard A., Christian ethics"

1

Richard A. McCormick and the renewal of moral theology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Fischer, David J. The development of the 'Direct/Indirect' distinction in the thought of Richard A. McCormick, S.J.: 1965 to the present. Ottawa: National Library of Canada, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Transzendentale Theorie und religiöse Erfahrung: Ihre Vermittlung als erkenntnistheoretische Grundintention in Richard Rothes Theologischer Ethik. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Richard Egenter: Leben und Werk. Regensburg: Verlag F. Pustet, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

1894-1962, Niebuhr H. Richard, ed. The transformation of culture: Christian social ethics after H. Richard Niebuhr. Scottdale, Pa: Herald Press, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Roots of relational ethics: Responsibility in origin and maturity in H. Richard Niebuhr. Atlanta, Ga: Scholars Press, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Dishonest criticism: Being a chapter of theology on equivocation and doing evil for a good cause : an answer to Dr. Richard F. Littledale. London: John Hodges, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Reinhold Niebuhr and Christian realism. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Baxter, Richard. The practical works of Richard Baxter: With a preface, giving some account of the author, and of this edition of his practical works : an essay on his genius, works, and times : and a portrait. Morgan, PA: Soli Deo Gloria Publications, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Richard A. McCormick and cauistry: Moral decision-making in conflict situations. Ottawa: National Library of Canada, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "McCormick, Richard A., Christian ethics"

1

Tubbs, James B. "Richard McCormick: Ordered Values and Proportionate Reasons." In Christian Theology and Medical Ethics, 13–53. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8654-2_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Equality before God in the thought of H. Richard Niebuhr." In Inequality and Christian Ethics, 114–39. Cambridge University Press, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139167123.008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"The Political Teaching of Richard Hooker (1553–1600)." In Forrester on Christian Ethics and Practical Theology, 315–22. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315255132-29.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography