Books on the topic 'Method of a direkt comparison'

Lombard, Juliana V. An empirical comparison of a direct and an indirect method of assessing writing proficiency. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council, Institute for Psychological and Edumetric Research, 1988.

Koura, Katsuhisa. Comparison between the null-collision and time-counter direct-simulation Monte Carlo methods: leading-edge flow. Tokyo: National Aerospace Laboratory, 1989.

Rodgers, E. B. Comparison of epifluorescent viable bacterial count methods. [Marshall Space Flight Center, Ala.]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, 1992.

Rodgers, E. B. Comparison of epifulorescent viable bacterial count methods. [Marshall Space Flight Center, Ala.]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, 1992.

Siu, Gilman Man Yuen. A comparison of Maslen's method, Riley & Dejarnette's method and MacCormack's method in hypersonic inviscid flow. [Downsview, Ont.]: Department of Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto, 1992.

Siu, Gilman Man Yuen. A comparison of Maslen's method, Riley & DeJarnette's method and MacCormack's method in hypersonic inviscid flow. Ottawa: National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1993.

Chan, Y. M. Robustness of Fieller's theorem and comparison with bootstrap method. Toronto: University of Toronto, Dept. of Statistics, 1985.

Edberg, Stephen C. Comparison of the Colilert method and standard fecal colifom methods. Denver, CO: AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association, 1994.

Srivastava, M. S. Comparison of approximate saddlepoint and saddlepoint method with Edgeworth expansion. Toronto: University of Toronto, Dept. of Statistics, 1987.

Krouwer, Jan S. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples: Approved guidelines. 2nd ed. Wayne, Pa: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2010.

Solaimanian, Mansour. Effectiveness comparison of TxDOT quality control/quality assurance and method specifications. Austin, Tex: Center for Transportation Research, Bureau of Engineering Research, the University of Texas at Austin, 1998.

Baek, Y. Comparison of the time vector method and the state-space method (Eigenvector analysis) for aircraft parameter identification. Cranfield, Bedford, England: Cranfield University, College of Aeronautics, 1996.

Baumeister, Kenneth J. Combining comparison functions and finite element approximations in CFD. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1995.

J, Stewart Pamela, ed. The python's back: Pathways of comparison between Indonesia and Melanesia. Westport, Conn: Bergin & Garvey, 2000.

Codina, R. Comparison of some finite element methods for solving the diffusion-convection-reaction equation. Barcelona, Spain: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1996.

Cristadoro, R. The seasonal adjustment of the harmonised index of consumer prices for the Euro area: A comparison of direct and indirect methods. Roma: Banca d'Italia, 2000.

Feng, Wang. Comparison of Languages in contact: The distillation method and the case of Bai. Nankang, Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, 2006.

Shu'Aibu, R. M. A comparison of Yourdon's modern structured method and Coad and Yourdon's object-oriented method for engineering complex real-time systems. Manchester: UMIST, 1994.

Shaw, Scott. Comparison of the convergence behaviour of three linear solvers for large, sparse unsymmetric matrices. Cranfield, England: Dept. of Aerospace Science, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, 1995.

Mitchell, William F. A comparison of adaptive refinement techniques for elliptic problems. Urbana, IL (1304 W. Springfield Ave., Urbana 61801): Dept. of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1987.

Anderson, Gordon. Nonparametric tests for common but unspecified population distributions: A Monte Carlo comparison. Toronto: Dept. of Economics and Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto, 1994.

Jagannathan, Ravi. Empirical evaluation of asset pricing models: A comparison of the SDF and beta methods. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001.

Zürich, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, ed. Static inductance extraction by means of the Monte Carlo method and comparison with related approaches. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre, 2001.

Chen, Chung-Hsing. The effectiveness of Top/Down Method: A comparison between the uk and Taiwan construction markets. Wolverhampton: University of Wolverhampton, 1999.

Dodgson, J. S. Valuing residential properties with the hedonic method: A comparison with the results of professional valuations. Salford: University of Salford Department of Economics, 1989.

Smith, Brian E. Application of a panel method to wake-vortex/wing interaction and comparison with experimental data. Moffett Field, Calif: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, 1987.

Heinonen, Mervi. Comparison of fracture toughness values obtained by SENB and Vickers indentation method for cermet materials. Manchester: UMIST, 1996.

Michaeloudis, Androulla. Studies in the application of the linear structural relation to method comparison studies of biochemical assays. London: North East London Polytechnic, 1986.

Srivastava, M. K. Redistribution of thermal x-ray radiation in cavities: View-factor method and comparison with DSn calculations. Mumbai: Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, 1999.

Chan, Y. M. Comparison of powers for the sphericity tests using both the assymptotic distribution and the bootstrap method. [Toronto]: University of Toronto, Dept. of Statistics, 1985.

Rubilar, R. Comparison of the TEP method for neutral particle transport in the plasma edge with Monte Carlo. Atlanta, Ga: Fusion Research Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2000.

Chaffin, Mark S. Navier-Stokes and potential theory solutions for a helicopter fuselage and comparison with experiment. Hampton, Va: Langley Research Center, 1994.

Lelis, J. M. Rodriguez. A Runge-Kutta time-marching method for two-dimensional nucleating flows of steam and comparison with measurements. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 1992.

McVey, Marianna. 1990 middle immersion review: A comparison of Ottawa Board of Education students in three French immersion programmes in grade 6 and grade 8. Ottawa: Ottawa Board of Education, 1990.

Robinson, Mark Charles. A comparison of a preferred and actual method of selecting and implementing computerised control systems in amanufacturing environment. Birmingham: Aston University, 1992.

Liatsou, Maria. " Two rooms with a view": A comparison of Stanislavski's method of creating a character with Dorothy Heathcote's method of gaining an expertise in the "mantle of the expert" approach. Birmingham: University of Central England in Birmingham, 2000.

Syriac Gospel translations: A comparison of the language and translation method used in the Old Syriac, the Diatessaron, and the Peshitto. Lovanii: In Aedibus E. Peeters, 1994.

Srivastava, M. S. A comparison of bootrap method and edgeworth expansion in approximating the distribution of sample variance: One sample and two sample cases. [Toronto]: University of Toronto, Dept. of Statistics, 1985.

Schwenzfeger, K. J. Comparison of ERS-1 scatterometer Monte Carlo performance simulations using a weighted nonlinear least-squares and a maximum likelihood estimation method. Neubiberg: Hochschule der Bundeswehr München, 1985.

Koomar, Bodun. Factors influencing choice of method of purchase for life assurance. A comparison between traditional methods and direct marketing. 1997.

Forster, M. S. K. A direct sampling method for the comparison of micr-organisms on hands and gloved hands in chiropodial practice. 1990.

A, Reams Gregory, and United States. Forest Service. Southern Research Station., eds. Kriging direct and indirect estimates of sulfate deposition: A comparison. [Asheville, N.C.]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 1997.

Candea, Matei. Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Candea, Matei. Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Gibson, Thomas, and Peter van der Veer. Value of Comparison. Duke University Press, 2016.

Gibson, Thomas, and Peter van der Veer. Value of Comparison. Duke University Press, 2016.

Considering Comparison: A Method for Religious Studies. Oxford University Press, 2019.

Pay Equity Commission of Ontario., ed. A Guide to the proxy comparison method. Toronto, Ont: Pay Equity Commission, 1993.

The Value of Comparison. Duke University Press Books, 2016.

Streiner, David L., Geoffrey R. Norman, and John Cairney. Scaling responses. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199685219.003.0004.