To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Misinterpretation.

Journal articles on the topic 'Misinterpretation'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Misinterpretation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Endicott, Timothy. "Legal misinterpretation." Jurisprudence 13, no. 1 (January 2, 2022): 99–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2022.2054215.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Riddell, Peter G. "Sacred Misinterpretation." Evangelical Quarterly 93, no. 1 (April 12, 2022): 61–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/27725472-09301005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bartel, Norbert, Thomas Herring, Michael Ratner, Irwin Shapiro, and Brian Corey. "Quasar Misinterpretation." Physics Today 40, no. 11 (November 1987): 126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2820293.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Zhao, Chengquan, Barbara A. Crothers, Mohiedean Ghofrani, Zaibo Li, Rhona J. Souers, Mujtaba Hussain, Fang Fan, Idris Tolgay Ocal, and Diane D. Davey. "Misinterpretation Rates of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic PAP Education and PAP Proficiency Test Program." Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 140, no. 11 (August 23, 2016): 1221–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2015-0446-cp.

Full text
Abstract:
Context.— Misinterpretation of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) is an important problem in daily practice and in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) PAP Proficiency Test (PAP-PT). Objective.— To investigate factors related to misinterpretation of HSIL through responses in a proficiency test versus an educational environment. Design.— We retrospectively evaluated 28 000 responses in the PAP Education Program (PAP-Edu) and 59 140 responses in PAP-PT from 1147 field-validated HSIL slides from 2007 to 2014. The related factors, such as program types, preparation types, participant types, and program years, were evaluated. Results.— Overall, 4.0% (2379 of 59 140) of responses for HSIL slides from PAP-PT were misinterpreted as either low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or negative, significantly more than those from PAP-Edu (3.2%; 898 of 28 000). However, the false-negative rate (misinterpreted as negative) was 0.9% (519 of 59 140) for PAP-PT, lower than that for PAP-Edu (1.0%; 266 of 28 000). The misinterpretation rates in PAP-PT trended down with time. Misinterpretation rates did not vary significantly by preparation methods. The misinterpretation rate for HSIL in the pathologists' responses was lower than that in cytotechnologists' responses in PAP-PT. More HSIL was misinterpreted as LSIL than as benign in both programs. Cytotechnologists interpreted HSIL as LSIL twice as much as pathologists. The most common false-negative misinterpretations were negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy and reparative change. Conclusions.— The higher LSIL misinterpretation rate by cytotechnologists may be related to the differences in reporting responsibilities and proficiency test grading criteria. The trend of gradually decreasing misinterpretation rates of a reference diagnosis of HSIL in the PAP-PT program may be related to higher test-taking confidence and better preparation through educational programs. The fact that pathologists performed better than cytotechnologists in PAP-PT, but not in PAP-Edu, may reflect a heightened approach and attentiveness in the test-taking environment for pathologists.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Tariq, Umbreen, Summaira Sarfraz, and Ali Abbas. "Digital media users and Facebook hashtags' misinterpretations." Online Information Review 44, no. 6 (July 16, 2020): 1183–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/oir-08-2019-0262.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeThis paper examines reasons of pragmatic functions' misinterpretation of three types of Facebook hashtags: long, short and multiple mixed hashtags.Design/methodology/approachFocus group interviews of 15 English language learners, who are also active users of Facebook and hashtags, are conducted. Thematic analysis is performed through the software Nvivo for arriving at reliable findings.FindingsThe findings show that unknown vocabulary in contents and lowercasing in long and short hashtags are major factors that cause misinterpretation. Also, the symbol of underscore and appropriate usage of upper and lowercasing of alphabets should be adopted in hashtag writing for the improvement in communication and successful conveyance of the intended meaning.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the online hashtag writing style by finding reasons for the misinterpretations of different types of hashtags. Hashtags have been developed for adequate communication (Livingstone, 2012), but in Pakistan, hashtags are practiced as a “fashionable” trend and thus result in misinterpretation and inadequate communication among readers even of the same background (Tariq and Sarfraz, 2018). Moreover, this study focuses on the trend of hashtagging that is common among university students and particularly second-language learners because they are active users of Facebook and adopt the latest trends quickly.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Lemos, Nivaldo A. "Talking 'bout misinterpretation." American Journal of Physics 90, no. 6 (June 2022): 409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/5.0097179.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Clement, Roland C. "On Conservative Misinterpretation." Environmental Ethics 15, no. 4 (1993): 371–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199315410.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Monroe, Carla R. "Misbehavior or Misinterpretation?" Kappa Delta Pi Record 42, no. 4 (July 2006): 161–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2006.10518021.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Jivraj, S., N. Dollay, P. Shah, N. Louskos, and K. Ranshi. "Endodontics: Gross misinterpretation." British Dental Journal 220, no. 3 (February 2016): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.70.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Barr, William. "Misinterpretation and obfuscation." Polar Record 51, no. 2 (October 15, 2014): 221–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247414000746.

Full text
Abstract:
The thrust of my note (Barr 2014), to which Ken McGoogan was responding (McGoogan 2014), was that in discovering Rae Strait in the spring of 1854 John Rae did not discover the final link in the northwest passage, since a substantial section of that particular variant of the passage some 240 km in length (namely Franklin Strait and Larsen Sound) lying further north, had not yet been discovered. McGoogan has wrongly concluded that I must therefore support the notion that Sir John Franklin discovered the passage. This is an unwarranted assumption. I do not subscribe to this belief; in this, at least McGoogan and I are in agreement. As David Buisseret, the editor of the The Oxford companion to world exploration has elegantly defined it, geographical discovery is ‘the process by which one or more people leave their society and venture to another part of the world [. . .] then return in order to explain what they have seen’ (Buisseret 2007, I: xxiii). Neither Franklin nor any of his officers and men returned.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Cioch, Frank A. "Measuring software misinterpretation." Journal of Systems and Software 14, no. 2 (February 1991): 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(91)90093-l.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Hagler, Paul, Helen Madill, and Lorian Kennedy. "Facing Choices about Our Beliefs regarding Support Personnel." Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 61, no. 4 (October 1994): 215–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000841749406100406.

Full text
Abstract:
This article is a rejoinder to the National Perspective (Strickland, 1993) which outlined the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapist's response to the Role and use of support personnel in the rehabilitation disciplines. (Hagler, et al, 1993). An invitation is extended to the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists to re-examine its position statement on the training, use and supervision of support personnel. The authors consider that the Association's position is based on opinion and misinterpretation, and while they believe that opinions must be respected and that misinterpretations will occur, they challenge these misinterpretations and provide data to refute some of the opinions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Chaffer, Denise. "Misinterpretation of baby friendly." Nursing Standard 10, no. 44 (July 24, 1996): 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.10.44.11.s29.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Duffy, Stephen W., and Linda D. Sharples. "Misinterpretation of published results." Addiction 89, no. 6 (June 1994): 756–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00962.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Fegade, Swapnil L., and Jason P. Trembly. "Misinterpretation of green chemistry." Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 37 (July 2017): 686–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.04.007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Kitcher, P. "A Case of Misinterpretation." Science 295, no. 5559 (February 22, 2002): 1466a—1466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5559.1466a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Francis, G. "Replication Initiative: Beware Misinterpretation." Science 336, no. 6083 (May 17, 2012): 802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.336.6083.802-a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Hense, K., M. Tajmar, and K. Marhold. "Electrostatic torque—a misinterpretation." Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 37, no. 36 (August 25, 2004): 8747–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/37/36/n01.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Power, Christopher, Jon D. Laman, and William Branton. "Misinterpretation of Study Data." JAMA Neurology 76, no. 1 (January 1, 2019): 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3668.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Vergés-Jaime, Joaquim. "The Misinterpretation of Productivity Measures." Challenge 64, no. 2 (January 11, 2021): 156–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2020.1866907.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Bruvoll, Annegrete. "The Misinterpretation of Pigouvian Taxes." Journal of Environmental Protection 04, no. 08 (2013): 154–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2013.48a1017.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Micaroni, Massimo. "Misinterpretation of ATP2C1 gene mutations." Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology 82, no. 3 (2016): 306. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.175922.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Hoekstra, Rink, Richard D. Morey, Jeffrey N. Rouder, and Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. "Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21, no. 5 (January 14, 2014): 1157–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Marrin, Donn L. "Soil-Gas Sampling and Misinterpretation." Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation 8, no. 2 (June 1988): 51–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.1988.tb00988.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Chitkara, Rajinder K., and Joseph Donath. "Misinterpretation of Lung Perfusion Scan." Critical Care Medicine 17, no. 7 (July 1989): 713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198907000-00037.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Newstead, Stephen E., and Richard A. Griggs. "Premise Misinterpretation and Syllogistic Reasoning." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 52, no. 4 (November 1, 1999): 1057–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027249899390927.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Kiesel, Alyson J. "Meaning And Misinterpretation in Cranford." ELH 71, no. 4 (2004): 1001–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/elh.2004.0048.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Newstead, Stephen E., and Richard A. Griggs. "Premise Misinterpretation and Syllogistic Reasoning." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 52, no. 4 (November 1999): 1057–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713755864.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Reeves, C. "Commentary: misinterpretation of the rules." BMJ 311, no. 7019 (December 9, 1995): 1561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7019.1561.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Brock-Utne, John G., and Richard A. Jaffe. "Misinterpretation of USP 797 Continues." Anesthesia & Analgesia 129, no. 5 (November 2019): e174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000004390.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Makkonen, Lasse. "Misinterpretation of the Shuttleworth equation." Scripta Materialia 66, no. 9 (May 2012): 627–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.055.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Ferreira, F. "The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences." Cognitive Psychology 47, no. 2 (September 2003): 164–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00005-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Renner, J., P. H. Tonner, and B. Bein. "Misinterpretation of the TEI-index." European Journal of Anaesthesiology 22, no. 2 (February 2005): 154–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265021505210281.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Kuller, Lewis H., and Daniel Edmundowicz. "Misinterpretation of Prostate Cancer Data." Journal of the American College of Cardiology 56, no. 22 (November 2010): 1862. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.615.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

陈, 光冶. "Historical Misinterpretation of Light Interference." Applied Physics 04, no. 12 (2014): 189–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/app.2014.412023.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

BORRUAT, FX. "Misinterpretation of common ophthalmic tests." Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 85 (October 2, 2007): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01063_2954.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Vasiliev, Vladimir S. "Misinterpretation of Soviet View Corrected." Journal - American Water Works Association 77, no. 2 (February 1985): 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1985.tb05480.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Wilson, Michael R., Brian D. O’Donovan, and Joseph L. DeRisi. "Misinterpretation of Study Data—Reply." JAMA Neurology 76, no. 1 (January 1, 2019): 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3671.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Lekas, Raimondas, and Vincentas Veikutis. "Misinterpretation of AV nodal tachycardia." Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 24 (May 1992): 263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2828(92)90813-f.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Fernández, Nathalie. "Misinterpretation of the odds ratios." International Journal of Infectious Diseases 96 (July 2020): 630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.084.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Ohst, Barnabas, and Brunna Tuschen-Caffier. "Are Catastrophic Misinterpretations of Bodily Sensations Typical for Patients with Panic Disorder? An Experimental Study of Patients with Panic Disorder or Other Anxiety Disorders and Healthy Controls." Cognitive Therapy and Research 44, no. 6 (August 10, 2020): 1106–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10141-0.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Background Research on catastrophic misinterpretations of bodily sensations in patients with a diagnosis of panic disorder has yielded inconsistent findings concerning the question of how typical these misinterpretations are and how this compares with other anxiety disorders. Limitations of assessment strategies concerning catastrophic misinterpretations have been discussed. We assessed catastrophic misinterpretations by activating participants’ fear memory, as has been suggested. Methods Participants in the experimental group (EG) were shown a suspenseful film clip to induce physiological arousal before completing a measure of catastrophic misinterpretation (BSIQ-FR). Skin conductance level (SCL) was used as marker for physiological arousal. Results As expected, the film manipulation led to a significant increase in physiological arousal in the EG compared to the control group (CG) across all disorder groups. ANOVAs did not show significant interactions between factors Group (Panic Disorder, Other Anxiety Disorder, and Healthy Controls) and Condition (EG, CG). However, comparison of means indicated that participants with panic disorder showed more catastrophic misinterpretations of bodily sensations than patients with other anxiety disorders in the EG, but not in the CG. Conclusions The findings indicate that the activation of fear memory via induction of physiological arousal facilitated the measurement of catastrophic misinterpretations, and provide further evidence that catastrophic misinterpretations of bodily sensations are typical for panic disorder.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Kim, Seongsoo, Wonhee Kim, Gu Hyun Kang, Yong Soo Jang, Hyun Young Choi, Jae Guk Kim, Yoonje Lee, and Dong Geum Shin. "Analysis of the accuracy of automatic electrocardiogram interpretation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction." Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 9, no. 1 (March 31, 2022): 18–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.21.163.

Full text
Abstract:
Objective This study aimed to analyze the association between the culprit artery and the diagnostic accuracy of automatic electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Methods This single-centered, retrospective cohort study included adult patients with STEMI who visited the emergency department between January 2017 and December 2020. The primary endpoint was the association between the culprit artery occlusion and the misinterpretation of ECG, evaluated by the chi-square test or Fisher exact test.Results The rate of misinterpretation of the automated ECG for patients with STEMI was 26.5% (31/117 patients). There was no significant correlation between the ST segment change in the four involved leads (anteroseptal, lateral, inferior, and aVR) and the misinterpretation of ECG (all P > 0.05). Single culprit artery occlusion significantly affected the misinterpretation of ECG compared with multiple culprit artery occlusion (single vs. multiple, 27/86 [31.3%] vs. 4/31 [12.9%], P = 0.045). There was no association between culprit artery and the misinterpretation of ECG (P = 0.132).Conclusion Single culprit artery occlusion might increase misinterpretation of ECG compared with multiple culprit artery occlusions in the automatic interpretation of STEMI.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Meng, Michael, and Markus Bader. "Does comprehension (sometimes) go wrong for noncanonical sentences?" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 74, no. 1 (August 25, 2020): 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021820947940.

Full text
Abstract:
This article addresses the question of whether the human parsing mechanism (HPM) derives sentence meaning always from representations that are computed algorithmically or whether the HPM sometimes resorts to non-algorithmic strategies that may result in misinterpretations. Misinterpretation effects for noncanonical sentences, such as passives, constitute important evidence in favour of models allowing for nonveridical representations. However, it is unclear whether these effects reflect errors in the mapping of form to meaning, or difficulties specific to the procedure used to test comprehension. We report two experiments combining two different comprehension tasks to address these alternative possibilities. In Experiment 1, participants first judged the plausibility of canonical and noncanonical sentences and then named the agent or patient of the sentence. In Experiment 2, the order of the two tasks was reversed. Both tasks require the correct identification of agent or patient/theme, but differ regarding the complexity of operations required to complete the task successfully. In both experiments, participants made a substantial number of errors with agent/patient naming, even when they had correctly assessed sentence plausibility. We conclude that misinterpretation effects do not indicate parsing errors and therefore cannot serve as evidence for non-algorithmic processing. Our results support models of the HPM that assume algorithmic processing only.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Moses, Jeffrey W. "On the misinterpretation of clinical trials." Interventional Cardiology 1, no. 1 (October 2009): 3–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/ica.09.7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Hardell, Lennart, Mikael Eriksson, and Olav Axelson. "On the Misinterpretation of Epidemiological Evidence." NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 4, no. 3 (November 1994): 49–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/ns4.3.h.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Stout, Margaret, and Jeannine M. Love. "The Unfortunate Misinterpretation of Miss Follett." Public Voices 13, no. 2 (November 29, 2016): 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.22140/pv.113.

Full text
Abstract:
Mary Follett was both a woman in public service in myriad roles from social worker to presidential advisor and a female public intellectual giving voice to what would later be called a feminist perspective. Based on a forthcoming book, this paper summarizes the fullness of Follett’s thinking and discusses the manner in which she is frequently misinterpreted in the literature, arguing that these misunderstandings are due to a lack of awareness of, or ability to grasp, her underlying relational process ontology. Misinterpretations in both the management and public administration literature are considered, ending with a call for scholars in both specializations to reconsider their interpretations from a more in-depth understanding of her work.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Grob, Jean-Jacques. "Actinic keratosis: diagnostic difficulties and misinterpretation." European Journal of Dermatology 22, S1 (December 2012): 10–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2012.1873.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Yeh, Chang-Ching, Huann-Cheng Horng, and Peng-Hui Wang. "Selective feticide in late trimester: Misinterpretation." Journal of the Chinese Medical Association 85, no. 2 (February 2022): 137–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jcma.0000000000000664.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

PACIONE, MICHAEL. "ON THE DANGERS OF MISINTERPRETATION – REJOINDER." Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 81, no. 1 (February 1990): 26–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1990.tb01744.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Paltiel, A. D., R. P. Walensky, and K. A. Freedberg. "Misinterpretation of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Findings." Clinical Infectious Diseases 59, no. 1 (April 12, 2014): 139–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu240.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography