Academic literature on the topic 'Modality of linguistics'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Modality of linguistics.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Modality of linguistics"
Selezneva, T. A. "The Problem of Logico-Philosophical Origins of the Category of Modality." MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 2(29) (April 28, 2013): 225–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-2-29-225-227.
Full textBritsуn, V. M., and L. V. Anishchenko. "Charles Ballyʼs paper «Syntaxe de la modalité explicite» and modern linguistics." Movoznavstvo 318, no. 3 (July 2, 2021): 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.33190/0027-2833-318-2021-3-003.
Full textLi, Jian, Le Cheng, and Winnie Cheng. "Deontic meaning making in legislative discourse." Semiotica 2016, no. 209 (March 1, 2016): 323–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0002.
Full textKural, Murat. "Modality in Causatives." Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 23, no. 1 (September 17, 1997): 224. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1276.
Full textCheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and Rint Sybesma. "Forked modality." Linguistics in the Netherlands 20 (November 11, 2003): 13–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/avt.20.05che.
Full textAbang Suhai, Dayang Sariah, Kesumawati A. Bakar, and Norsimah Mat Awal. "Modaliti dalam Wacana Perbahasan Parlimen (Modality in Parliamentary Debates)." GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies 20, no. 4 (November 27, 2020): 186–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2004-11.
Full textZenenko, N. "Functional-semantic interpretation of the desire modality in Ibero-Romance languages." Cuadernos Iberoamericanos, no. 2 (June 28, 2018): 34–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2018-2-34-39.
Full textMagaña, Dalia. "Modality across genres in Spanish as a heritage language." Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 34, no. 1 (July 22, 2021): 171–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/resla.18048.mag.
Full textTucker, Gordon H. "Possibly alternative modality." Aspects of “Interpersonal Grammar” 8, no. 2 (December 31, 2001): 183–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/fol.8.2.03tuc.
Full textCostello, Brendan. "Language and modality." Sign Language and Linguistics 19, no. 2 (December 31, 2016): 270–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.2.06cos.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Modality of linguistics"
Boylan, David (David Henry). "Subjective modality." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120670.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 99-104).
This dissertation focuses on subjective or epistemic readings of the modals 'might' and 'should' and considers how they fit into broader theories of modal vocabulary. Chapter 1, 'What the Future "Might" Brings', develops a puzzle about epistemic modals and tense, showing that future tensed epistemic modals are surprisingly marked in cases of predictable forgetting. It gives a solution whereupon epistemic modals are monotonic: their domains only shrink going forward in time. It is noted that this property is also a feature of circumstantial modals and a new general picture of how epistemic and historical modality are related is proposed. Chapter 2, 'Putting "Ought"s Together', argues that deontic but not epistemic 'ought's appear to obey the inference pattern Agglomeration. It gives a new semantics for 'ought', where it is an existential quantifier over best propositions, and shows how this semantics together with pragmatic features of deontic contexts can explain the differing inferential properties of deontics and epistemics. Chapter 3, 'More Miners', generalises the now infamous miners problem to epistemic 'ought's. It shows that conservative non-probabilistic solutions do not extend to epistemic cases with the same structure. It solves the problem using probabilisitic orderings over propositions and draws some morals about the metasemantics of such orderings and the role of neutrality in the semantics of deontic modals.
by David Boylan.
Ph. D. in Linguistics
Hacquard, Valentine. "Aspects of modality." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37421.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. 205-214).
It is a cross-linguistically robust fact that the same modal auxiliaries come in different flavors: epistemic, deontic, ability, teleological... This fact is neatly captured in a system where each modal has a single lexical entry, where the difference in flavor comes from contextually-provided accessibility relations (cf. Lewis 1973, Kratzer 1981). Equally robust, however, are the phenomena that suggest that epistemics and a subset of deontics are interpreted higher than the remaining flavors (subsumed under the label 'root modals'). The goal of this dissertation is to show that a unified analysis of modal auxiliaries is maintainable, while still providing some principled explanation for the relative ordering of tense, aspect and the various modals in Cinque's (1999) hierarchy, based on evidence in French and Italian. To make sense of the relative scope of modals w.r.t. tense and aspect, I start with the empirical puzzle that aspect interacts differently with the various modal flavors. Perfective aspect on roots in French and Italian yields 'actuality entailments' (cf. Bhatt 1999), that is, an uncancelable inference that the proposition expressed by the complement holds in the actual world, and not merely in some possible world(s).
(cont.) I propose that this inference obtains when aspect scopes above the modal, and must therefore take the actual world as its world argument. Because epistemics/deontics are interpreted above aspect, they are immune to the effect. To derive the height problem, I propose to relativize the accessibility relation of a modal to an event, instead of a world: the accessibility relation has a free event variable, which needs to be bound locally, either by aspect (i.e., a quantifier over events), the speech event, or an embedding attitude verb. Further selectional restrictions on the event type each accessibility relation requires limits the possible combinations of event binders and accessibility relations. The resulting binding possibilities reduce the systematic constraints on the range of a modal's interpretations to independently-motivated syntactic assumptions on locality and movement, and explain why the various flavors of the same modal auxiliaries are interpreted at different heights.
by Valentine Hacquard.
Ph.D.
Yalcin, Seth. "Modality and inquiry." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45893.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. 117-125).
The possibilities we consider or eliminate in inquiry are epistemic possibilities. This dissertation is mainly about what it is to say or believe that something is possible in this sense. Chapter 1 ('Epistemic Contradictions') describes a new puzzle about epistemic modals and uses it to explore their logic and semantics. Chapter 2 ('Nonfactualism about Epistemic Modality') situates the work of chapter 1 into a larger picture of content and communication, developing a broadly expressivist account of the language of epistemic modality. Chapter 3 ('Content and Modal Resolution') argues that states of belief should be understood as relativized to an inquiry, understood formally as a certain way of dividing up logical space.
Seth Yalcin.
Ph.D.
Badran, Dany. "Ideology through modality." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2002. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12216/.
Full textHorvat, Ana Werkmann. "Layers of modality." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2017. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:b7633467-cc32-44d8-9692-a147b1493e63.
Full textDecker, Jason (Jason Andrew). "Modality, rationalism, and conditionals." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39344.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 105-108).
This thesis consists of three interconnected papers on apriority, modality, and conditionals. In "Playground Conditionals," I look at three philosophical debates, each of which turns on the epistemic status of a certain kind of conditional-what I call a playground conditional. I argue that a close consideration of playground conditionals gives us a better appreciation of what we can do with conditionals and, ultimately, some guidance concerning what to say about the three philosophical debates. In "Modal Rationalism, Two Dimensionalism, and our Counteractual Sisters", I consider the prospects for modal rationalism in the wake of Kripke's Naming and Necessity. Recently there has been a modal rationalist revival, thanks in part to the development of the "two-dimensional" semantic framework. This framework associates two intensions (a primary intension and a secondary intension) with every sentence. The difficulty comes in finding a definition of primary and secondary intension that would lend the desired support to modal rationalism. After exploring and rejecting some of the proposed definitions in the literature, I sketch an account that can, I think, offer some support to a suitably framed modal rationalism.
(cont.) Finally, in "A Guide to Modal Guidance," I set about to get clearer on how, exactly, we come to know modal truths. I start by considering two arguments that are designed to show that our access to modal knowledge cannot come from conceivability arguments. I show that, these arguments are mistaken. In the process, I attempt to outline a broader and more realistic modal epistemology than one that focuses exclusively on conceivability. I then consider and reject a version of modal rationalism which says that ideal conceivability gives us a priori access to modality. Against this, I argue that our modal knowledge is predominantly a posteriori, and that our knowledge of ideal conceivability is always a posteriori. In the end, however, I attempt to salvage something that preserves the spirit, if not the letter, of modal rationalism.
by Jason Decker.
Ph.D.
Badram, Dany. "Ideology through modality in discourse analysis." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.275961.
Full textPfau, Roland, and Markus Steinbach. "Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages." Universität Potsdam, 2006. http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2006/1088/.
Full textYanovich, Igor. "Four pieces for modality, context and usage." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84422.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 259-269).
The main part of this dissertation consists of four loosely connected chapters on the semantics of modals. The chapters inform each other and employ similar methods, but generally each one is self-contained and can be read in isolation. Chapter 2 introduces new semantics for epistemic modality. I argue that the epistemic modal base consists of the propositions that can be obtained by the interlocutors early enough to affect their resolution of their current practical goal. Integrated into the standard contextualist semantics, the new definition successfully accounts for two sets of data that have been claimed to falsify standard contextualism, namely from disagreement dialogues and complements of attitude verbs. Chapter 3 traces the historical rise of the may-under-hope construction, as in I hope we may succeed. In that construction, the modal does not contribute its normal existential modal force. It turns out that despite the construction's archaic flavor in Present-Day English, it is a very recent innovation that arose not earlier than the 16th century. I put forward a hypothesis that the may-under-hope construction arose as the replacement of an earlier construction where the inflectional subjunctive under verbs of hoping was used to mark a specific type of formal hopes about good health. Chapter 4 proposes that O(ld) E(nglish) *motan, the ancestor of Modern English must, was a variable-force modal somewhat similar to the variable-force modals of the American Pacific Northwest. I argue that in Alfredian OE, motan(p) presupposed that if p gets a chance to actualize, it will. I also argue that several centuries later, in the 'AB' dialect, Early Middle English *moten is was genuinely ambiguous between possibility and necessity. Thus a new trajectory of semantic change is discovered: variable force, to ambiguity between possibility and necessity, to regular necessity. Chapter 5 argues that, first, restrictions on the relative scope of deontics and clausemate negation can hardly be all captured within the syntactic component, and second, that capturing some of them can be due to semantic filters on representations. I support the second claim by showing how such semantic filters on scope may arise historically, using Russian stoit 'should' and English have to as examples.
by Igor Yanovich.
Ph.D.in Linguistics
Rizomilioti, Vassiliki. "Epistemic modality in academic writing : a corpus-linguistic approach." Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.288688.
Full textBooks on the topic "Modality of linguistics"
Modalität und Evidentialität: Modality and evidentiality. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2011.
Find full textModes of modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014.
Find full textKramer, Christina Elizabeth. Analytic Modality in Macedonian. Bern: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers, 1986.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Modality of linguistics"
Gergel, Remus. "Modality and gradation." In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 319–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.227.11ger.
Full textNauze, Fabrice. "Modality and context dependence." In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 317–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.148.13nau.
Full textLee, Hyo Sang. "Modality." In The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, 249–68. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118371008.ch14.
Full textSzécsényi, Krisztina. "Control and covert modality in Hungarian." In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 167–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.270.06sze.
Full textVan Benthem, Johan. "Tense And Modality." In Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 101–8. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4540-1_5.
Full textCresswell, M. J. "Modality and Supervenience." In Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 156–72. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2139-9_11.
Full textRubinstein, Aynat. "Existential possessive modality in the emergence of Modern Hebrew." In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 55–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.256.03rub.
Full textVarlokosta, Spyridoula. "Eventivity, modality and temporal reference in early child Greek." In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 217–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.76.09var.
Full textDavis, Henry, Lisa Matthewson, and Hotze Rullmann. "‘Out of control’ marking as circumstantial modality in St’át’imcets." In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 205–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.148.09dav.
Full textHernanz, M. Lluïsa. "From polarity to modality: Some (a)symmetries betweenbienandsíin Spanish." In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 133–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.111.08her.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Modality of linguistics"
Papafragou, Anna, and Ozge Isik Ozturk. "The acquisition of epistemic modality." In ExLing 2006: 1st Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics. ExLing Society, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36505/exling-2006/01/0044/000044.
Full textDerbanosov, R., and M. Bakhanova. "STABILITY OF TOPIC MODELING VIA MODALITY REGULARIZATION." In International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies "Dialogue". Russian State University for the Humanities, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2075-7182-2020-19-198-210.
Full textWan, Mingyu, and Baixi Xing. "Modality Enriched Neural Network for Metaphor Detection." In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: International Committee on Computational Linguistics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.270.
Full textWan, Mingyu, and Baixi Xing. "Modality Enriched Neural Network for Metaphor Detection." In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: International Committee on Computational Linguistics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.270.
Full textEid, Sarah. "Linguistics at the Service of Machine Translation: Modality as an Example." In المؤتمر العلمي الدولي التاسع - "الاتجاهات المعاصرة في العلوم الاجتماعية، الانسانية، والطبيعية". شبكة المؤتمرات العربية, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.24897/acn.64.68.142.
Full textDonatelli, Lucia, Kenneth Lai, and James Pustejovsky. "A Two-Level Interpretation of Modality in Human-Robot Dialogue." In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: International Committee on Computational Linguistics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.373.
Full textDonatelli, Lucia, Kenneth Lai, and James Pustejovsky. "A Two-Level Interpretation of Modality in Human-Robot Dialogue." In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: International Committee on Computational Linguistics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.373.
Full textLetuchiy, A. B. "THE ANALOGUES OF TENSE INTERPRETATION IN RUSSIAN EMBEDDED CLAUSES: ABSOLUTE VS. RELATIVE MODALITY, ABSOLUTE VS. RELATIVE ASPECT." In International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies "Dialogue". Russian State University for the Humanities, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2075-7182-2020-19-1065-1077.
Full textPan, Hongliang, Zheng Lin, Peng Fu, Yatao Qi, and Weiping Wang. "Modeling Intra and Inter-modality Incongruity for Multi-Modal Sarcasm Detection." In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.124.
Full textZheng, Chen, Quan Guo, and Parisa Kordjamshidi. "Cross-Modality Relevance for Reasoning on Language and Vision." In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.683.
Full text