To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Model Misspecification.

Journal articles on the topic 'Model Misspecification'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Model Misspecification.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Tarpey, Thaddeus, Dong Yun, and Eva Petkova. "Model misspecification." Statistical Modelling: An International Journal 8, no. 2 (2008): 199–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1471082x0800800204.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Plümper, Thomas, and Vera E. Troeger. "Not so Harmless After All: The Fixed-Effects Model." Political Analysis 27, no. 1 (2018): 21–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.17.

Full text
Abstract:
The fixed-effects estimator is biased in the presence of dynamic misspecification and omitted within variation correlated with one of the regressors. We argue and demonstrate that fixed-effects estimates can amplify the bias from dynamic misspecification and that with omitted time-invariant variables and dynamic misspecifications, the fixed-effects estimator can be more biased than the ‘naïve’ OLS model. We also demonstrate that the Hausman test does not reliably identify the least biased estimator when time-invariant and time-varying omitted variables or dynamic misspecifications exist. Accor
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Yuan, Ke-Hai, Linda L. Marshall, and Peter M. Bentler. "8. Assessing the Effect of Model Misspecifications on Parameter Estimates in Structural Equation Models." Sociological Methodology 33, no. 1 (2003): 241–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.00132.x.

Full text
Abstract:
Model misspecifications may have a systematic effect on parameters, causing biases in their estimates. In the application of structural equation models, every interesting model is fallible. When simultaneously evaluating a model, it is of interest to study whether all parameters are affected by a misspecification. This paper provides three procedures for evaluating such an effect: (1) analyzing the path, (2) using a functional relationship, and (3) using a significance test. Analyzing the path is illustrated through a confirmatory factor model. This method is ad hoc but intuitive. A more rigor
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Uppal, Raman, and Tan Wang. "Model Misspecification and Underdiversification." Journal of Finance 58, no. 6 (2003): 2465–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00612.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Winship, Christopher, and Bruce Western. "Multicollinearity and Model Misspecification." Sociological Science 3 (2016): 627–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.15195/v3.a27.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Robitzsch, Alexander. "Modeling Model Misspecification in Structural Equation Models." Stats 6, no. 2 (2023): 689–705. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/stats6020044.

Full text
Abstract:
Structural equation models constrain mean vectors and covariance matrices and are frequently applied in the social sciences. Frequently, the structural equation model is misspecified to some extent. In many cases, researchers nevertheless intend to work with a misspecified target model of interest. In this article, a simultaneous statistical inference for sampling errors and model misspecification errors is discussed. A modified formula for the variance matrix of the parameter estimate is obtained by imposing a stochastic model for model errors and applying M-estimation theory. The presence of
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Bonhomme, Stéphane, and Martin Weidner. "Minimizing sensitivity to model misspecification." Quantitative Economics 13, no. 3 (2022): 907–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3982/qe1930.

Full text
Abstract:
We propose a framework for estimation and inference when the model may be misspecified. We rely on a local asymptotic approach where the degree of misspecification is indexed by the sample size. We construct estimators whose mean squared error is minimax in a neighborhood of the reference model, based on one‐step adjustments. In addition, we provide confidence intervals that contain the true parameter under local misspecification. As a tool to interpret the degree of misspecification, we map it to the local power of a specification test of the reference model. Our approach allows for systemati
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

McMillen, Daniel P. "Spatial Autocorrelation Or Model Misspecification?" International Regional Science Review 26, no. 2 (2003): 208–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0160017602250977.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Chien, Li-Chu, and Tsung-Shan Tsou. "Regression Diagnostic under Model Misspecification." Journal of Applied Statistics 34, no. 5 (2007): 563–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02664760701235014.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Hansen, Lars Peter, Thomas J. Sargent, Gauhar Turmuhambetova, and Noah Williams. "Robust control and model misspecification." Journal of Economic Theory 128, no. 1 (2006): 45–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2004.12.006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Bohren, J. Aislinn. "Informational herding with model misspecification." Journal of Economic Theory 163 (May 2016): 222–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2016.01.011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Waggoner, Daniel F., and Tao Zha. "Confronting model misspecification in macroeconomics." Journal of Econometrics 171, no. 2 (2012): 167–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.06.013.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Liu, Ren. "Misspecification of Attribute Structure in Diagnostic Measurement." Educational and Psychological Measurement 78, no. 4 (2017): 605–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164417702458.

Full text
Abstract:
Attribute structure is an explicit way of presenting the relationship between attributes in diagnostic measurement. The specification of attribute structures directly affects the classification accuracy resulted from psychometric modeling. This study provides a conceptual framework for understanding misspecifications of attribute structures. Under the framework, each attribute structure can be represented through an external shape and an internal organization. A simulation study and an application example were used to investigate how misspecification of external shapes and internal organizatio
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Ellison, Martin, and Thomas J. Sargent. "Welfare Cost of Business Cycles with Idiosyncratic Consumption Risk and a Preference for Robustness." American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7, no. 2 (2015): 40–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/mac.20130098.

Full text
Abstract:
The welfare cost of random consumption fluctuations is known from De Santis (2007) to be increasing in the level of uninsured idiosyncratic consumption risk. It is known from Barillas, Hansen, and Sargent (2009) to increase if agents care about robustness to model misspecification. We calculate the cost of business cycles in an economy where agents face idiosyncratic consumption risk and fear model misspecification, finding that idiosyncratic risk has a greater impact on the cost of business cycles if agents already fear model misspecification. Correspondingly, endowing agents with fears about
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Beatty, Anne, Sandra Chamberlain, and Joseph Magliolo. "An Empirical Analysis of Model Misspecification in Studies of Valuation of Financial Statement Disclosures." Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 10, no. 4 (1995): 719–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148558x9501000403.

Full text
Abstract:
A number of studies have examined the correlation between financial statement disclosures and share prices to assess the informativeness of these disclosures. There are several potential econometric problems with analyses of this type, and the interpretations of the results depend critically on the type of econometric problem. For example, the results of these studies should not be used to answer accounting policy questions unless the effect of an omitted variable bias is likely to be minimal. Given potential interpretation problems, we argue that analysis of model misspecification should be p
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Viraswami, K., and N. Reid. "Higher-order asymptotics under model misspecification." Canadian Journal of Statistics 24, no. 2 (1996): 263–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3315632.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Anderson, Garnet L., and Thomas R. Fleming. "Model Misspecification in Proportional Hazards Regression." Biometrika 82, no. 3 (1995): 527. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2337531.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Robinson, Timothy J., and Jeffery B. Birch. "Model misspecification in parametric dual modeling." Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 66, no. 2 (2000): 113–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00949650008812017.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Risch, Neil, and Luis Giuffra. "Model Misspecification and Multipoint Linkage Analysis." Human Heredity 42, no. 1 (1992): 77–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000154047.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Presnell, Brett, and Dennis D. Boos. "The IOS Test for Model Misspecification." Journal of the American Statistical Association 99, no. 465 (2004): 216–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/016214504000000214.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Inoue, Atsushi, Chun-Hung Kuo, and Barbara Rossi. "Identifying the sources of model misspecification." Journal of Monetary Economics 110 (April 2020): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.01.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Spokoiny, Vladimir, and Mayya Zhilova. "Bootstrap confidence sets under model misspecification." Annals of Statistics 43, no. 6 (2015): 2653–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/15-aos1355.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Tzavelas, George, Maria Douli, and Polychronis Economou. "Model misspecification effects for biased samples." Metrika 80, no. 2 (2016): 171–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00184-016-0597-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

ANDERSON, G. L., and T. R. FLEMING. "Model misspecification in proportional hazards regression." Biometrika 82, no. 3 (1995): 527–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/82.3.527.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Luo, Yulei, Jun Nie, and Eric R. Young. "Ambiguity, Low Risk-Free Rates and Consumption Inequality." Economic Journal 130, no. 632 (2020): 2649–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa045.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Macroeconomists failed to predict the Great Recession, suggesting that the existing macroeconomic models may have been misspecified. Bearing in mind this potential misspecification or ‘model uncertainty’, how do agents’ optimal decisions change? Furthermore, how large are the welfare costs of model misspecification? To shed light on these questions, we develop a tractable continuous-time general equilibrium model to show that a fear of model misspecification reduces both the equilibrium interest rate and the relative inequality of consumption to income, making the model’s predictions
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Hernández, Freddy, and Viviana Giampaoli. "The Impact of Misspecified Random Effect Distribution in a Weibull Regression Mixed Model." Stats 1, no. 1 (2018): 48–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/stats1010005.

Full text
Abstract:
Mixed models are useful tools for analyzing clustered and longitudinal data. These models assume that random effects are normally distributed. However, this may be unrealistic or restrictive when representing information of the data. Several papers have been published to quantify the impacts of misspecification of the shape of the random effects in mixed models. Notably, these studies primarily concentrated their efforts on models with response variables that have normal, logistic and Poisson distributions, and the results were not conclusive. As such, we investigated the misspecification of t
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Falk, Carl F., and Scott Monroe. "On Lagrange Multiplier Tests in Multidimensional Item Response Theory: Information Matrices and Model Misspecification." Educational and Psychological Measurement 78, no. 4 (2017): 653–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164417714506.

Full text
Abstract:
Lagrange multiplier (LM) or score tests have seen renewed interest for the purpose of diagnosing misspecification in item response theory (IRT) models. LM tests can also be used to test whether parameters differ from a fixed value. We argue that the utility of LM tests depends on both the method used to compute the test and the degree of misspecification in the initially fitted model. We demonstrate both of these points in the context of a multidimensional IRT framework. Through an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study, we examine the performance of LM tests under varying degrees of model mis
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Zhu, Hai, Xia Luo, Yanjin Li, Ying Zhu, and Qian Huang. "Comparing the efficiency and robustness of state-of-the-art experimental designs for stated choice modeling: A simulation analysis." Advances in Mechanical Engineering 9, no. 2 (2017): 168781401769189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1687814017691894.

Full text
Abstract:
Among the ways to construct experimental designs having been proposed, orthogonal design, uniform design, and D-efficient design are state-of-the-art methods. This article provides detailed comparisons on the efficiency and robustness among these methods with three case studies in multinomial logit and mixed multinomial logit models. ND-error values and the departures of D-errors corresponding to misspecification of prior information are used as measurements of design efficiency and design robustness, respectively. Design methods are described, and designs with various numbers of runs are cons
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Gasparini, Alessandro, Mark S. Clements, Keith R. Abrams, and Michael J. Crowther. "Impact of model misspecification in shared frailty survival models." Statistics in Medicine 38, no. 23 (2019): 4477–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8309.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Kirby, James B., and Kenneth A. Bollen. "10. Using Instrumental Variable Tests to Evaluate Model Specification in Latent Variable Structural Equation Models." Sociological Methodology 39, no. 1 (2009): 327–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2009.01217.x.

Full text
Abstract:
Structural equation modeling (SEM) with latent variables is a powerful tool for social and behavioral scientists, combining many of the strengths of psychometrics and econometrics into a single framework. The most common estimator for SEM is the full-information maximum likelihood (ML) estimator, but there is continuing interest in limited information estimators because of their distributional robustness and their greater resistance to structural specification errors. However, the literature discussing model fit for limited information estimators for latent variable models is sparse compared w
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Rainey, Carlisle, and Robert A. Jackson. "Unreliable Inferences About Unobserved Processes: A Critique of Partial Observability Models." Political Science Research and Methods 6, no. 2 (2017): 381–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.3.

Full text
Abstract:
Methodologists and econometricians advocate the partial observability model as a tool that enables researchers to estimate the distinct effects of a single explanatory variable on two partially observable outcome variables. However, we show that when the explanatory variable of interest influences both partially observable outcomes, the partial observability model estimates are extremely sensitive to misspecification. We use Monte Carlo simulations to show that, under partial observability, minor, unavoidable misspecification of the functional form can lead to substantial large-sample bias, ev
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Raborn, Anthony W., Walter L. Leite, and Katerina M. Marcoulides. "A Comparison of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms for Scale Short-Form Development." Educational and Psychological Measurement 80, no. 5 (2020): 910–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164420906600.

Full text
Abstract:
This study compares automated methods to develop short forms of psychometric scales. Obtaining a short form that has both adequate internal structure and strong validity with respect to relationships with other variables is difficult with traditional methods of short-form development. Metaheuristic algorithms can select items for short forms while optimizing on several validity criteria, such as adequate model fit, composite reliability, and relationship to external variables. Using a Monte Carlo simulation study, this study compared existing implementations of the ant colony optimization, Tab
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Vansteelandt, Stijn, Maarten Bekaert, and Gerda Claeskens. "On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference." Statistical Methods in Medical Research 21, no. 1 (2010): 7–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280210387717.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Yoon, Heewon, and Kwang Mo Jeong. "Covariance Estimates of GLMs under Model Misspecification." Korean Data Analysis Society 20, no. 5 (2018): 2177–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.37727/jkdas.2018.20.5.2177.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Kruijer, Willem. "Misspecification in Mixed-Model-Based Association Analysis." Genetics 202, no. 1 (2015): 363–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.177212.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Niu, Yabo, Debdeep Pati, and Bani K. Mallick. "Bayesian graph selection consistency under model misspecification." Bernoulli 27, no. 1 (2021): 637–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3150/20-bej1253.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Lee, Seonjoo, Brian S. Caffo, Balaji Lakshmanan, and Dzung L. Pham. "Evaluating model misspecification in independent component analysis." Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 85, no. 6 (2013): 1151–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2013.867961.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Nambiar, Mila, David Simchi-Levi, and He Wang. "Dynamic Learning and Pricing with Model Misspecification." Management Science 65, no. 11 (2019): 4980–5000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3194.

Full text
Abstract:
We study a multiperiod dynamic pricing problem with contextual information, where the seller uses a misspecified demand model. The seller sequentially observes past demand, updates model parameters, and then chooses the price for the next period based on time-varying features. We show that model misspecification leads to a correlation between price and prediction error of demand per period, which, in turn, leads to inconsistent price elasticity estimates and hence suboptimal pricing decisions. We propose a “random price shock” (RPS) algorithm that dynamically generates randomized price shocks
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Gustafson, Paul. "On measuring sensitivity to parametric model misspecification." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 63, no. 1 (2001): 81–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00277.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Piegorsch, Walter W., Daniela K. Nitcheva, and R. Webster West. "Excess risk estimation under multistage model misspecification." Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 76, no. 5 (2006): 423–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10629360500107808.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Reisen, Valderio A., Manoel R. Sena Jr., and Silvia R. C. Lopes. "Error and Model Misspecification in ARFIMA Process." Brazilian Review of Econometrics 21, no. 1 (2001): 101. http://dx.doi.org/10.12660/bre.v21n12001.3193.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Lemonte, Artur J. "On the gradient statistic under model misspecification." Statistics & Probability Letters 83, no. 1 (2013): 390–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2012.10.008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Lin, Chang-Yun. "Robust split-plot designs for model misspecification." Journal of Quality Technology 50, no. 1 (2018): 76–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2018.1404325.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Venditti, Chris, and Mark Pagel. "MODEL MISSPECIFICATION NOT THE NODE-DENSITY ARTIFACT." Evolution 62, no. 8 (2008): 2125–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00407.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Süveges, Mária, and Anthony C. Davison. "Model misspecification in peaks over threshold analysis." Annals of Applied Statistics 4, no. 1 (2010): 203–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-aoas292.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Pereira, Tarciana L., and Francisco Cribari-Neto. "Detecting Model Misspecification in Inflated Beta Regressions." Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 43, no. 3 (2013): 631–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2012.712183.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Rubtsov, Alexey. "Model misspecification and pricing of illiquid claims." Finance Research Letters 18 (August 2016): 242–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.04.023.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Norget, Julia, and Axel Mayer. "Block-Wise Model Fit for Structural Equation Models With Experience Sampling Data." Zeitschrift für Psychologie 230, no. 1 (2022): 47–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000482.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract. Common model fit indices behave poorly in structural equation models for experience sampling data which typically contain many manifest variables. In this article, we propose a block-wise fit assessment for large models as an alternative. The entire model is estimated jointly, and block-wise versions of common fit indices are then determined from smaller blocks of the variance-covariance matrix using simulated degrees of freedom. In a first simulation study, we show that block-wise fit indices, contrary to global fit indices, correctly identify correctly specified latent state-trait
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Sias, Richard, Harry J. Turtle, and Blerina Zykaj. "Hedge Fund Return Dependence: Model Misspecification or Liquidity Spirals?" Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 52, no. 5 (2017): 2157–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022109017000679.

Full text
Abstract:
We test whether model misspecification or liquidity spirals primarily explain the observed excess dependence in filtered (for economic fundamentals) hedge fund index returns and the links between volatility, liquidity shocks, and hedge fund return clustering. Evidence supports the model misspecification hypothesis: i) hedge fund filtered return clustering is symmetric, ii) filtered Short Bias fund returns exhibit negative dependence with filtered returns for other hedge fund types, iii) negative liquidity shocks are associated with clustering in both tails and market volatility subsumes the ro
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Beierl, Esther T., Markus Bühner, and Moritz Heene. "Is That Measure Really One-Dimensional?" Methodology 14, no. 4 (2018): 188–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000158.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract. Factorial validity is often assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Model fit is commonly evaluated using the cutoff values for the fit indices proposed by Hu and Bentler (1999) . There is a body of research showing that those cutoff values cannot be generalized. Model fit does not only depend on the severity of misspecification, but also on nuisance parameters, which are independent of the misspecification. Using a simulation study, we demonstrate their influence on measures of model fit. We specified a severe misspecification, omitting a second factor, which signifies factoria
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!