Academic literature on the topic 'Monogamous relationships'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Monogamous relationships.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Monogamous relationships"
Conley, Terri D., Jennifer L. Piemonte, Staci Gusakova, and Jennifer D. Rubin. "Sexual satisfaction among individuals in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 35, no. 4 (March 23, 2018): 509–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407517743078.
Full textMoors, Amy C., Jes L. Matsick, and Heath A. Schechinger. "Unique and Shared Relationship Benefits of Consensually Non-Monogamous and Monogamous Relationships." European Psychologist 22, no. 1 (January 2017): 55–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000278.
Full textWood, Jessica, Serge Desmarais, Tyler Burleigh, and Robin Milhausen. "Reasons for sex and relational outcomes in consensually nonmonogamous and monogamous relationships." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 35, no. 4 (March 23, 2018): 632–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407517743082.
Full textBalzarini, Rhonda N., Christoffer Dharma, Amy Muise, and Taylor Kohut. "Eroticism Versus Nurturance." Social Psychology 50, no. 3 (May 2019): 185–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000378.
Full textAggarwal, Pankaj, and Mengze Shi. "Monogamous versus Polygamous Brand Relationships." Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 3, no. 2 (April 2018): 188–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/697078.
Full textMogilski, Justin K., Simon D. Reeve, Sylis C. A. Nicolas, Sarah H. Donaldson, Virginia E. Mitchell, and Lisa L. M. Welling. "Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships." Archives of Sexual Behavior 48, no. 6 (January 3, 2019): 1811–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1286-4.
Full textDomínguez, Giazú Enciso, Joan Pujol, Johanna F. Motzkau, and Miroslav Popper. "Suspended transitions and affective orderings: From troubled monogamy to liminal polyamory." Theory & Psychology 27, no. 2 (April 2017): 183–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354317700289.
Full textWillis, Abbey S. "“One among many”? Relational panopticism and negotiating non-monogamies." Sexualities 22, no. 4 (October 18, 2018): 507–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363460718756569.
Full textLandor, Antoinette M., and Virginia Ramseyer Winter. "Relationship quality and comfort talking about sex as predictors of sexual health among young women." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 36, no. 11-12 (April 22, 2019): 3934–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407519842337.
Full textCastro, Aurelio. "Stories Told Together: Male Narratives of Non-Monogamous Bi+ and Heterosexual Men." Archives of Sexual Behavior 50, no. 4 (May 2021): 1461–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02008-6.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Monogamous relationships"
Banks, Eric Ormond. "EXAMINING INFIDELITIES WITHIN MONOGAMOUS DATING RELATIONSHIPS." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2001. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin991753533.
Full textTahler, Heather. "Relational Satisfaction in Long-Term, Non-monogamous, Heterosexual Relationships." Thesis, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2014. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3644027.
Full textObjectives: Study was designed to explore questions examining relational satisfaction in long-term non-monogamous heterosexual couples in comparison to relational satisfaction in long-term sexually monogamous heterosexual couples, as well as gain insight into whom those involved in non-monogamous relationships disclose to and the potential stigma felt by this disclosure. Demographic variables were also explored to see if any prediction of marital satisfaction occurred.
Methods: Both long-term sexually monogamous and long-term sexually non-monogamous participants responded to a secure online survey. The survey consisted of informed consent, inclusion criteria, ENRICH marital satisfaction scale (Fowers and Olson 1993) items, and open-ended questions for items not assessed by the ENRICH scale alone.
Results: After checking for univariate normality and outliers and assessing missing value patterns, results show that both the Marital Satisfaction and Idealistic Distortion scales were reliable. The findings in the study revealed that relationship type did not have a significant impact on marital satisfaction or idealistic distortion, with similar levels of satisfaction and idealistic distortion in both monogamous and non-monogamous couples. The results also demonstrated, through linear regression for demographic variables, that only income level significantly predicted marital satisfaction. After qualitative data was coded, there were many themes found within both monogamous and non-monogamous couples.
Conclusions: Data supports the original hypothesis that there was very little difference in marital satisfaction between monogamous and non-monogamous heterosexual couples. With these results, non-monogamy is a more viable relationship option than previously recognized for couples that are interested, and it is necessary to create models to work with these couples. Developing further research within this population specifically is also necessary for the future.
Cook, Elaine S. "Commitment in polyamorous relationships." Connect to this title online, 2005. http://165.236.235.140/lib/ECook2005.pdf.
Full textChin-Ortiz, Shi-Ming Peggy. "Polyamrous attitudes/lifestyle and interactional qualities of the primary relationship /." Connect to CIFA website:, 2008. http://sites.google.com/site/californiainventoryforfamilyassessment/Home.
Full textBoucherie, Palmyre. "Layers of social organisation in rooks, a monogamous bird species." Thesis, Strasbourg, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016STRAJ107/document.
Full textNumerous avian species are good candidates to study the emergence of complex forms of sociality, in particular the species showing advanced cognitive skills, and the one living in groups all year long, coping with the costs and benefits of group living. In my thesis, I investigated the proximate mechanisms underlying the diversity and dynamic of social relationships in captive adult rooks, a colonial and monogamous corvid species. I found that rooks have the ability to form non-reproductive social bonds and several pair bonds throughout their life. In addition, I found: that the group social structure was flexible enough to allow temporal variations of relationships, group composition and sex-ratio; and that dominance relationships do not have any long lasting effects on the stabilisation of the structure. Overall, my work demonstrates that rooks social structure extends far beyond a simple aggregation of reproductive pairs, and may be acknowledged as a multi-level social organisation
Gardner, Timothy Joseph. "Queering polyamory configurations, public policy, and lived experiences /." Connect to this title online, 2005. http://etdindividuals.dlib.vt.edu:9090/299/.
Full textGallagher, Robert Dale. "Pre-Expose Prophylaxis and Non-Monogamous, HIV Negative Gay Men in Serodiscordant Relationships." ScholarWorks, 2018. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/5861.
Full textRausch, Meredith Anne. "Relationship between experiences of adverse childhood events and intimate partner violence in adult same sex monogamous relationships." Diss., University of Iowa, 2015. https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1734.
Full textMariutto, Elizabeth. "Relationship Commitment and its Associations with Relationship Contingency, Body Surveillance, and Body Shame." Xavier University / OhioLINK, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=xavier1401304768.
Full textCartun, Melissa A. "The role of attachment in extradydic [i.e. extradyadic] behavior." View electronic thesis (PDF), 2009. http://dl.uncw.edu/etd/2009-2/cartunm/melissacartun.pdf.
Full textBooks on the topic "Monogamous relationships"
Thompson, Bill. First choice, only choice: Relationships that last forever. Enumclaw, WA: WinePress Pub., 2007.
Find full textThompson, Bill. First choice, only choice: Relationships that last forever. Enumclaw, WA: WinePress Pub., 2007.
Find full textTaormino, Tristan. Opening up: A guide to creating and sustaining open relationships. San Francisco, Calif: Cleis Press, 2008.
Find full textTaormino, Tristan. Opening up: A guide to creating and sustaining open relationships. San Francisco, Calif: Cleis Press, 2008.
Find full textTaormino, Tristan. Opening up: A guide to creating and sustaining open relationships. San Francisco, Calif: Cleis Press, 2008.
Find full textRavenscroft, Anthony. Polyamory: Roadmaps for the clueless and hopeful. Santa Fe, NM: Fenris Brothers, 2004.
Find full textEvans, Luke. Professor Marston and the Wonder Women. Culver City, Ca: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, 2017.
Find full textLinssen, Leonie. Love unlimited: The joys and challenges of open relationships. Forres, Scotland: Findhorn Press, 2010.
Find full textMah, Timothy. Social and cultural contexts of concurrency in Khayelitsha. Cape Town, South Africa: Centre for Social Science Research University of Cape Town, 2009.
Find full textLyons, Andie. Non monogamy: Doin' it and doin' it and doin' it well? Denver, CO: The authors, 2008.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Monogamous relationships"
Sigler, Stephanie. "Clinical Misconceptions about Alternative Relationships." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 55–62. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-6.
Full textSigler, Stephanie. "Relationship Structures." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 24–42. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-4.
Full textSigler, Stephanie. "Relationship Contract." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 351–53. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-58.
Full textSigler, Stephanie. "Mixed Orientation Relationship." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 330–34. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-50.
Full textSigler, Stephanie. "New Relationship Energy." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 382–83. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-73.
Full textSigler, Stephanie. "Designing Your ENM Relationship." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 337–40. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-52.
Full textSigler, Stephanie. "Relationship Contract: Therapist Guide." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 349–50. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-57.
Full textSigler, Stephanie. "Mixed Orientation Relationship: Therapist Guide." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 328–29. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-49.
Full textSigler, Stephanie. "New Relationship Energy: Therapist Guide." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 380–81. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-72.
Full textSigler, Stephanie. "Sex Menu." In The Clinician's Guide to Ethical Non-Monogamous Relationships, 405–6. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003464891-83.
Full text