Academic literature on the topic 'Moral dissonance'

War and moral dissonance. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

The moral majority and fundamentalism: Plausibility and dissonance. E. Mellen Press, 1989.

Churchill, Robert Paul. Moral Transformation. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190468569.003.0008.

Moss-Wellington, Wyatt. Cognitive Film and Media Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197552889.001.0001.

Swartz, Sharlene. "Moral Processes: Decision Making And Dissonance." In The Moral Ecology of South Africa’s Township Youth. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230101647_6.

Moss-Wellington, Wyatt. "Moral and Cognitive Dissonance in Cinema." In Cognitive Film and Media Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197552889.003.0005.

DeSoucey, Michaela. "Gastronationalism on the Ground." In Contested Tastes. Princeton University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691154930.003.0003.

Duncan, Nigel, and Alwyn Jones. "Developing Reflection on Values as a Foundation for a Business Career." In Handbook of Research on Teaching Ethics in Business and Management Education. IGI Global, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-510-6.ch005.

Swensen, Stephen J., and Tait D. Shanafelt. "Introduction." In Mayo Clinic Strategies To Reduce Burnout, edited by Stephen J. Swensen and Tait D. Shanafelt. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190848965.003.0001.

Perry, Samuel L. "Fleshly Lusts That War Against the Soul." In Addicted to Lust. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844219.003.0004.

Moore, Gregory J. "Niebuhr on the UN, Globalization, and the Potential for National Transcendence." In Niebuhrian International Relations. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197500446.003.0005.

Jones, Raya A. "On Human Freedom in a Posthuman Future: Sources of Dialogical Tensions." In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/faia200945.

"substantial numbers of students cheat not just once, but repeatedly (Hollinger & Lanza-Kaduce, 1996; McCabe & Treviño, 1995; Moffatt, 1990). Given the prevalence of academic dishonesty among college students, it is not surprising that considerable research has been conducted on its causes and corre-lates, with more than 100 studies having been published on the topic during the past 3 decades (Whitley, 1998). What is more surprising is the relative lack of at-tention that researchers have paid to gender differences in academic dishonesty given the important role gender plays in theories of in moral reasoning (e.g., Lapsley, 1996). Theorists such as Chodorow (1989) and Gilligan (1982) proposed that differential childhood socialization processes lead to different moral reason-ing orientations in men and women. These theorists proposed that gender differ-ences in moral orientation result in gender differences in behavior, with women being less likely than men to violate social norms because of the negative effects that such violations could have on other people and the potential of such violations to impair fulfillment of women's nurturant role obligations (Robbins & Martin, 1993). Thus, women are less likely than men to engage in minor criminal behavior (e.g., Tibbetts & Herz, 1996), excessive alcohol consumption (e.g., Robbins & Martin, 1993), and unprovoked aggression (e.g., Bettencourt & Miller, 1996). One would therefore expect to find similar gender differences in violations of academic integrity norms, especially given that engaging in academic dishonesty is corre-lated with engaging in other forms of minor deviance (Blankenship & Whitley, 2000; Whitley, 1998). However, in a meta-analysis of research on gender differences in cheating, Whitley, Nelson, and Jones (1999) found a mean difference of only 0.2 standard deviations between men's and women's self-reports of having cheated. Although this difference was statistically significant due to the large cumulative sample size in the meta-analysis, in absolute terms it just met Cohen's (1992) criterion for a nontrivial effect size. In contrast, Whitley et al. found a mean gender difference of about 0.5 standard deviations for attitudes toward cheating, with women reporting more negative attitudes. Thus, women hold more negative attitudes toward cheat-ing than do men but are about equally likely to cheat. Cognitive dissonance theory holds that such attitude-behavior inconsistencies lead to a negative emotional state called cognitive dissonance (Elliot & Devine, 1994; Festinger, 1957). Because, on the average, women hold more negative atti-tudes toward cheating than do men, one would expect women who cheat to experi-ence more cognitive dissonance and so to have more negative affective reactions to having cheated than would men. Although little research has been conducted on such gender differences, Smith, Ryan, and Diggins (1972) found that women re-ported experiencing more guilt over having cheated than did men. In addition, Tibbetts (1997) found that women reported more shame concerning intentions to cheat, and Cochran, Chamlin, Wood, and Sellers (1999) found that women re-ported expecting to feel more shame and embarrassment if they cheated. Further-." In Academic Dishonesty. Psychology Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781410608277-5.

Rushby, Nicholas John. "Publication ethics – moral principles and cultural dissonance." In World-Class Scientific Publication – 2017: Best Practices in Preparation and Promotion of Publications. ASEP; NP “NEICON”; Ural University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24069/2017.978-5-7996-2227-5.01.