Relevant bibliographies by topics / Moustiers

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Moustiers'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Moustiers.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Moustiers"

1

Alary, Jean-Claude. "Les pots d'apothicairerie de Moustiers." Revue d'histoire de la pharmacie 89, no. 329 (2001): 43–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/pharm.2001.5182.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Moustiers, P. "L'art et la science : un croisement fertile. Entretien avec le romancier Pierre Moustiers Propos recueillis par Jean-Marie LegayArt and science : a fertile encounter. Interview with the writer Pierre Moustiers." Nature Sciences Sociétés 11, no. 3 (July 2003): 298–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1240-1307(03)00088-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Valladas, H., J. M. Geneste, J. L. Joron, and J. P. Chadelle. "Thermoluminescence dating of Le Moustier (Dordogne, France)." Nature 322, no. 6078 (July 1986): 452–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/322452a0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Maureille, Bruno. "La redécouverte du nouveau-né néandertalien Le Moustier 2." Paléo, no. 14 (December 1, 2002): 221–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/paleo.1458.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gunz, Philipp, Simon Neubauer, Bruno Maureille, and Jean-Jacques Hublin. "Virtual reconstruction of the Le Moustier 2 newborn skull." Paléo, no. 22 (December 1, 2011): 155–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/paleo.2107.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ponce De León, Marcia S. "Computerized paleoanthropology and Neanderthals: The case of Le Moustier 1." Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 11, S1 (January 7, 2003): 68–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evan.10060.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kotov, V. G., and M. M. Rumyantsev. "PALEOLITHIC SITE-WORKSHOP OF AKBULATOVO-3 IN THE MOUNTAIN PART OF THE BELAYA RIVER (BASHKORTOSTAN)." Вестник Пермского университета. История, no. 1(52) (2021): 15–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2021-1-15-34.

Full text
Abstract:
The discovery of the pre-Mousterian monument, dating back to the Middle Pleistocene era, in the mountain-forest zone of the Southern Urals is of great interest both for archaeology, in particular, considering the problem of time and ways of setting on the territory, and for geology, taking into account the dating of the terraces of river valleys in the mountainous part of the region. The site-workshop Akbulatovo-3 is confined to the cover deposits of the III floodplain terrace of the Belaya river, 15 m above the modern level of the river, including pebble and clastic material from quartzite in the deposits of brownish-brown loam of periglacial type of the late Risian time. The collection of items from quartzite (447 items) is represented by a variety of cores: cuboid, orthogonal, sub-cone, and biplatformed. The tools were made both by bifacial processing and on flakes, less often on amorphous plate-like chips. Among them, there are “Acheulean” forms – choppers, peaks, simple scrapers, and “Upper Paleolithic” ones – scrapers, burins, punctures, carvers, and chisel tools. Such a combination of archaic types of tools and cores with “progressive” forms of tools and cores, characteristic of the Moustier and Upper Paleolithic gives grounds to attribute the complex to the end of the Acheulean era or to the beginning of the Moustier. A similar monument, combining the Acheulean types of tools and cores with the Mousterian and Upper Paleolithic ones, was discovered on Lake Turogoyak in the Chelyabinsk region – the site Naves (Island of Vera 6a) at the porphyrite exits. This allows the authors to attribute them to a single technological tradition, called the “Akbulatov type of industry”.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Louryan, Stéphane, Mathilde Daumas, Tara Chapman, and Nathalie Vanmuylder. "Nouvel examen des moulages des ossements du squelette néandertalien du Moustier I." Morphologie 103, no. 342 (November 2019): 113–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2019.09.016.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bergez, Jacques-Eric, Marie-Hélène Charron, Delphine Leenhardt, and Jean-Claude Poupa. "MOUSTICS: A generic dynamic plot-based biodecisional model." Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 82 (March 2012): 8–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.12.006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Weaver, Timothy D., Hélène Coqueugniot, Liubov V. Golovanova, Vladimir B. Doronichev, Bruno Maureille, and Jean-Jacques Hublin. "Neonatal postcrania from Mezmaiskaya, Russia, and Le Moustier, France, and the development of Neandertal body form." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 23 (May 23, 2016): 6472–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523677113.

Full text
Abstract:
Neandertal and modern human adults differ in skeletal features of the cranium and postcranium, and it is clear that many of the cranial differences—although not all of them—are already present at the time of birth. We know less, however, about the developmental origins of the postcranial differences. Here, we address this deficiency with morphometric analyses of the postcrania of the two most complete Neandertal neonates—Mezmaiskaya 1 (from Russia) and Le Moustier 2 (from France)—and a recent human sample. We find that neonatal Neandertals already appear to possess the wide body, long pubis, and robust long bones of adult Neandertals. Taken together, current evidence indicates that skeletal differences between Neandertals and modern humans are largely established by the time of birth.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Moustiers"

1

Beaux-Laffon, Marie-Germaine. "Les entreprises en céramique des Fouque et Arnoux en Midi toulousain au XIXe siècle : innovation, rayonnement." Thesis, Toulouse 2, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012TOU20073.

Full text
Abstract:
Au tournant du XIXe siècle, des faïenciers de Provence, Joseph-Jacques Fouque et Antoine Arnoux, s’installent à Toulouse pour faire prospérer un atelier de « faïence anglaise ». En association familiale, ils produisent des faïences et des terres cuites. L’énergie hydraulique permet de mécaniser la production et dès 1825, la faïence fine est imprimée. Grâce à des capitaux réunis dans la région, ils fondent une société, Fouque Arnoux et Cie, en 1829 et construisent une nouvelle manufacture à Saint-Gaudens/Valentine pour produire la porcelaine avec le kaolin des Pyrénées. Léon Arnoux fait des recherches sur les couleurs de grand feu et améliore les fours. Les Fouque et Arnoux expédient dans tout le Midi et exportent vers les colonies. Un atelier de décoration et de revente est dirigé par Gustave Fouque. La manufacture et cet atelier participent aux expositions industrielles à Paris et à Toulouse et reçoivent de nombreux prix. La crise de 1846-1848 provoque la faillite de la société, avec la fermeture et la vente des locaux toulousains ; Léon Arnoux émigre en Angleterre où il devient directeur artistique chez Minton à Stoke-on-Trent. A Saint- Gaudens/Valentine, la production reprend avec Henri Fouque, puis avec des Anglais ; la manufacture ferme définitivement en 1878. Pendant trois quarts de siècle, la manufacture a produit toutes sortes de produits en céramique, donnant à Toulouse un visage à caractère industriel
Around 1800, Provencal potters Joseph-Jacques Fouque and Antoine Arnoux developed a «faïence anglaise» workshop in Toulouse. As a family unit they produced earthenware and terracotta. They employed hydraulic energy to mechanize production to an industrial level. From 1825 their earthenware carried prints and with local funds they founded an enterprise Fouque Arnoux et Cie in 1829 and built a new factory at St-Gaudens/Valentine to produce porcelain from Pyrenean kaolin. Léon Arnoux researched colors and kilns. The Fouques and Arnoux supplied the south of France and exported to the colonies. In parallel a decoration business and shop employed Toulouse artists and sold the latest offerings from Paris. The factory and this workshop won industrial exhibition medals in Paris and Toulouse. The 1846-1848 crises caused the downfall of the company with the closure and sale of the Toulouse properties. Léon Arnoux immigrated to England where he became Minton’s artistic director. In St-Gaudens/Valentine, production restarted with Henri Fouque who called on English capital which never arrived. The manufactory finally closed in 1878. These Provencal manufacturers by the transfer of their knowledge and craft to the Midi area gave Toulouse, more specifically in the second quarter of the XIXth Century, its industrial face and character, this enterprise taking its place among the other French earthenware and porcelain makers
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Gravina, Bradley. "La fin du Paléolithique moyen en Poitou-Charentes et Périgord : considérations à partir de l'étude taphonomique et technoéconomique des sites du Moustier (niveaux G à K) et La Roche-à- Pierrot, Saint Césaire (niveau EJOP supérieur)." Thesis, Bordeaux, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016BORD0148.

Full text
Abstract:
En Europe de l’Ouest et tout particulièrement dans le Sud-Ouest de la France, la période comprise entre environ 60 et 40 mille ans avant le présent est marquée par une mosaïque de changements culturels et démographiques. L’étude des industries lithiques montre que les derniers groupes néandertaliens semblent avoir diversifié leurs comportements techniques juste avant de disparaître. Les industries dites de « transition »,notamment le Châtelperronien, sont souvent considérées comme l’aboutissement d’une trajectoire d’évolution technique néandertalienne. Cependant, notre compréhension des différentes industries du Moustérien récent, de leur chronologie, de leur organisation et de leur succession, ainsi que de leurs liens potentiels avec l’émergence du Paléolithique supérieur, est rendue infiniment complexifiée par, d’une part, le recours à des collections anciennes provenant de fouilles parfois réalisées il y a plus d’un siècle, et, d’autre part, l’absence de révision critique de certaines séquences clés. Ce travail présente une étude techno-typologique et taphonomique des industries lithiques de plusieurs niveaux majeurs de l’Abri inférieur du Moustier, sur la base d’une révision des collections anciennes mais aussi de l’analyse de matériel issu de la reprise récente des fouilles dans ce gisement de référence. Les résultats acquis au Moustier, combinés avec une révision critique de l’association présumée entre industrie châtelperronienne et restes humains néandertaliens à Saint-Césaire, soulèvent d’intéressantes questions sur les modalités de définition des techno-complexes lithiques et sur notre perception des conditions de la disparition des Néandertaliens
During the period between broadly 60 ky and 40 ky Western Europe, and especially south-western France, was the theatre for a mosaic of bio-cultural changes. Late Neanderthal groups appeared to have diversified their lithic technology just prior to disappearing. This technological trajectory is commonly seen as culminating in the so-called ‘transitional ‘industries, notably the Châtelperronian. However, our understanding of the chronology, organisation and succession of the Late Mousterian and its possible relation to the emergence of the Upper Palaeolithic in this region is complicated due to the reliance on sites excavated sometimes as longas a century ago combined with the absence of a critical appraisal of certain key sites. This thesis presents arevision of previously recovered and newly excavated material from several important levels of Le Moustier(Lowe Shelter). When considered in light of a revision of the Châtelperronian-Neandertal association at Saint-Césaire, these results pose interesting questions for the definition of lithic techno-complexes and how we view the complex question of Neandertal extinction/replacement
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Soressi, Marie. "Le Moustérien de tradition acheuléenne du sud-ouest de la France : discussion sur la signification du faciès à partir de l'étude comparée de quatre sites : Pech-de-l'Azé I, Le Moustier, La Rochette et la Grotte XVI." Phd thesis, Bordeaux 1, 2002. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00573675.

Full text
Abstract:
Ce manuscrit présente une base de données technologiques, économiques et morpho-fonctionnelles pour quatre gisements moustériens de tradition acheuléenne (MTA) du sud-ouest de la France. Ces gisements, dont les deux gisements éponymes, ont livré des niveaux MTA de type A et MTA de type B datés du stade isotopique quatre ou de la première partie du stade isotopique trois par des méthodes de datations radiométriques. L'analyse des pièces bifaciales montre leur caractère polyfonctionnel, leur raffûtage et leur utilisation comme outils et comme pourvoyeurs d'éclats dans des localités éloignées de celle de leur production. Une nouvelle méthode de débitage, caractéristique par son organisation volumétrique semi-tournante et par la morphologie de ses produits allongés et à dos, a été reconnue dans ces ensembles. La comparaison des techniques et des méthodes utilisées dans ces gisements et dans d'autres gisements du sud-ouest de la France permet de mettre en évidence l'unité des savoir-faire et des connaissances techniques partagés par les artisans des ces industries MTA. En revanche, l'organisation de l'activité de taille dans le territoire est variable. Les industries MTA A témoignent d'une fragmentation du processus opératoire dans le territoire, et cela même dans des contextes où la matière première est abondamment disponible. L'ensemble des opérations de taille est au contraire toujours effectué dans une unité de temps et de lieu pour les industries MTA B. La comparaison des industries MTA avec le Micoquien d'Europe centrale permet d'établir l'originalité de ce faciès, du point de vue de la méthode de production et de retouche des pièces bifaciales. Deux unités culturelles voisines pourraient ainsi être distinguées par leurs méthodes de production bifaciale dans le première partie du stade isotopique trois, l'une centrée sur le sud-ouest de la France, l'autre sur l'Europe centrale. Les changements comportementaux du MTA A par rapport au MTA B pourraient être interprétés comme un changement dans l'organisation de la mobilité des groupes, celle-ci devenant plus résidentielle après avoir été plus logistique. En outre, la combinaison des spécificités techniques et techno-fonctionnelles d'un des débitages MTA – le débitage d'éclats allongés - est partagée par le MTA et le Châtelperronien alors qu'elle est inconnue dans les autres industries du Paléolithique supérieur. La thèse selon laquelle le Châtelperronien trouve ses racines dans le MTA est renforcée et la capacité des Moustériens à développer des technologies de type Paléolithique supérieur indépendamment du contact avec les premiers aurignaciens est confirmée. Enfin, la forte prédétermination et planification de certains processus de taille MTA diminue le contraste parfois établi de ce point de vue entre les industries du Paléolithique moyen et du Paléolithique supérieur.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Moustiers"

1

Guillemé-Brulon, Dorothée. Moustiers & Marseille: Sources et rayonnement. Paris: Ed. Charles Massin, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Julien, Louis. Faïenciers de Moustiers: Biographies & pièces marquées. Barbentane: Equinoxe, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Julien, Louis. L' art de la faïence à Moustiers: XVIIe-XVIIIe-XIXe. La Calade, Aix-en-Provence: Edisud, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Collard-Moniotte, Denise. Catalogue des faïences de Moustiers: Sèvres, Musée national de céramique [et] Limoges, Musée national Adrien Dubouché. Paris: Ministère de la culture et de la communication, Editions de la Réunion des musées nationaux, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Jourdan-Barry, Pierre. Donations Pierre et Lison Jourdan-Barry: Marseille-Moustiers, faïence-porcelaine : Musée de la faïence, Château Pastré, 26 mars-16 septembre 1999. Marseille]: Musées de Marseille, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Carcassonne, Musée de. Faïences françaises du Musée des beaux-arts de Carcassonne: Ardus, Bordeaux, Lyon, Marseille, Martres Tolosane, Montauban, Montpellier, Moustiers, Rouen, Lunéville, Saint-Clément, Toulouse, Varages. [Carcassonne]: Le Musée, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

1940, l'armistice-trahison: Le courage politique de Léonel de Moustier. Besançon: Cêtre, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Faïences de Moustiers. Paris: C.P.I.P., 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Guillemé-Brulon, Dorothée. Moustiers et Marseille. Charles Massin, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gilbert-Jean, Malgras, and Frasnay Daniel, eds. Fai ences de Moustiers. Paris: C.P.I.P., 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Moustiers"

1

"Le Moustier." In Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology, 752. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58292-0_120205.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

O'Connor, Anne. "The Advent of the Abbé Breuil." In Finding Time for the Old Stone Age. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199215478.003.0017.

Full text
Abstract:
In 1930, Boswell made a compelling statement of his faith in the British Palaeolithic sequence as a reliable guide to geological time. The archaeologist Harold Peake (1867–1946), honorary curator of Newbury Museum whose interests ranged from earliest prehistory to the Bronze Age, had attended the same session at the annual meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. He was provoked by Boswell’s conviction to offer a cautious warning: As a geologist he [Boswell] is sceptical of the possibility of solving the problem [of placing the East Anglian glacial deposits in sequence] by geological means, and turns to archaeological evidence as supplying more reliable data for the purpose. As an archaeologist I have similar doubts as to the efficacy of my own subject, though I am inclined to believe that the possibilities of the geological approach have been underrated. I would submit that the true succession of types of the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic phases, with which alone we are concerned, appears today to be by no means as certain as it did ten years ago. Broadly speaking we have evidence of successive stages of two industries, a core industry and a flake industry. Peake explained that some stages of the flake industry, which included ‘the types known as Levallois and LeMoustier and perhaps others’, seemed to have existed in Britain before the core industry went out of use. (‘Core’ industries were those like the Chellean and Acheulian: with hand-axes that were often made on nodules or ‘cores’ of flint.) This meant that ‘the simple succession, Early Chelles, Chelles, Evolved Chelles, St Acheul, and Le Moustier no longer holds good’. Early flake industries, like Warren’s Mesvinian from Clacton, had attracted more interest of late. By appearing alongside the hand-axe industries of the simple, standard sequence, they added greater variety to the character of stone tools that had existed at any one period of time, but they also reduced the chronological value of the old Palaeolithic sequence. Boswell, though he was absent from this meeting of 1930 (his paper had been read for him), learnt of Peake’s concern. He complained the following year: ‘If, as Mr. H. Peake has recently said, ‘‘. . . the simple succession Early Chelles, Chelles, Evolved Chelles, St Acheul, and Le Moustier no longer holds good,’’ I personally almost despair of a solution’.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"Are Supermarkets Poor- friendly? Debates and Evidence from Vietnam Paule Moustier, Muriel Figuié, Dao The Anh and Nguyen Thi Tan Loc." In The Crisis of Food Brands, 341–56. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315615134-28.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

O'Connor, Anne. "River-Drift Men and Cave Men." In Finding Time for the Old Stone Age. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199215478.003.0012.

Full text
Abstract:
British researchers often compared their river-drift tools to French finds. The gravel pits of St Acheul, rich in hand-axes, were a popular choice. Another was the cave of Le Moustier, known for its scrapers. By the end of the nineteenth century, British tools might be called ‘Mousterian’, ‘Acheulian’, or ‘Chellean’. These labels are associated with the French prehistorian Gabriel de Mortillet, and it is often assumed that de Mortillet’s classification clarified a hazy image of the British Palaeolithic sequence. There are two problems with this assumption. First, the picture of river-drift tools gained from Chapter 3 suggests that British researchers cannot be compared to a sponge, waiting to soak up Continental classifications. They did use these French labels, but they did not necessarily adopt all de Mortillet’s beliefs as well. Second, researchers other than de Mortillet were building sequences on the Continent in the nineteenth century, and de Mortillet was aware of their research when he developed his Chellean, Acheulian, and Mousterian epochs. So were British researchers, but they were also encouraged by these Continental findings to make another, more fundamental, division of the British implements. One question that had puzzled British researchers was the connection between tools from their caves and those from their river-drifts; it was dificult to link the isolated pockets of cave sediments to the drifts lying in river valleys. Another question, closely related, concerned the term ‘Palaeolithic’: what tools and what time-period did it encompass? The geologists from Chapter 2 used their sequences of bones, river drifts, and glaciers to answer the first question; but answers to both were also found in the bones and tools of France and Belgium (Map 1 gives the location of the major sites mentioned in the text).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Moustiers' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography