Academic literature on the topic 'Movement abc-2'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Movement abc-2.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Movement abc-2"
Kastner, Julia, Hermann Mayer, Alexandra Walther, and Franz Petermann. "Motorisch-koordinative Leistungs- fähigkeit adipöser Jugendlicher." Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie 58, no. 3 (January 2010): 227–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1661-4747.a000031.
Full textVan Waelvelde, Hilde, Wim Peersman, Mattieu Lenoir, and Bouwien C. M. Smits Engelsman. "Convergent Validity between Two Motor Tests: Movement-ABC and PDMS-2." Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 24, no. 1 (January 2007): 59–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/apaq.24.1.59.
Full textJary, Sally. "Motor impairment in children born preterm: assessment with the Movement ABC-2." Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 59, no. 5 (January 13, 2017): 455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13388.
Full textHouwen, Suzanne, Esther Hartman, Laura Jonker, and Chris Visscher. "Reliability and Validity of the TGMD-2 in Primary-School-Age Children With Visual Impairments." Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 27, no. 2 (April 2010): 143–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/apaq.27.2.143.
Full textKakebeeke, Tanja H., Elisa Knaier, Sabrina Köchli, Aziz Chaouch, Valentin Rousson, Susi Kriemler, and Oskar G. Jenni. "Comparison between the Movement ABC-2 and the Zurich Neuromotor Assessment in Preschool Children." Perceptual and Motor Skills 123, no. 3 (October 2, 2016): 687–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0031512516664991.
Full textPetermann, Franz, and Julia Kastner. "Motoriktest für 3- bis 16-Jährige." physiopraxis 7, no. 03 (March 2009): 40–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1308270.
Full textShall, Mary S. "The Importance of Saccular Function to Motor Development in Children with Hearing Impairments." International Journal of Otolaryngology 2009 (2009): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/972565.
Full textSchulz, Joerg, Sheila E. Henderson, David A. Sugden, and Anna L. Barnett. "Structural validity of the Movement ABC-2 test: Factor structure comparisons across three age groups." Research in Developmental Disabilities 32, no. 4 (July 2011): 1361–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.032.
Full textKe, Li, Wenchong Du, Yun Wang, Wen Duan, Jing Hua, and Anna L. Barnett. "The Movement ABC-2 Test in China: Comparison with UK norms for 3–10 year olds." Research in Developmental Disabilities 105 (October 2020): 103742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103742.
Full textUusitalo, Karoliina, Leena Haataja, Anna Nyman, Liisi Ripatti, Mira Huhtala, Päivi Rautava, Liisa Lehtonen, et al. "Preterm children’s developmental coordination disorder, cognition and quality of life: a prospective cohort study." BMJ Paediatrics Open 4, no. 1 (April 2020): e000633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000633.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Movement abc-2"
Souza, Luciano Portes de. "Validação do Movement Assessment Battery for Children - second edition checklist para a língua portuguesa." Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, 2012. http://tede.udesc.br/handle/handle/246.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
The battery assessment for motor evaluation, Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (MABC-2), composed of motor tests and a questionnaire (MABC-2 Checklist), has been used and tested in various nationalities to identify children with motor problems. However, due to cultural differences between the country of origin of the protocol (United Kingdom) and some cultures where the protocol was used (Australia, Spain and Japan), it was noticed the need for further studies and adaptations in some parts of the test for use in those countries. This study aimed to validate part of the MABC-2, the Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition - Checklist to Portuguese language. We performed the translation of the instrument into Brazilian Portuguese by a standard procedure of translation, back translation and judgment by a committee of experts, composed by four teachers and seven doctors. The experts examined the original and translated to check consistency between the versions and suggest modifications. Adaptations were made in consensus with the committee of experts, defined a Pre-Final version, which was then tested. The instrument was answered by 40 children's responsible and 16 teachers (14 regents and two Physical Education teachers). The children's responsible also answered the DCDQ-BR questionnaire. Were evaluated with the motor tests of the instrument MABC-2, 98 school children aged between 7 and 10 years, of both sexes. The final version of the instrument MABC-2 Checklist presented a high level of internal consistency with alpha equal to 0.953, a result pointed out as being excellent. Although the instrument has been presented valid, it did not show a high degree of trust in inter-rater reliability test, showing a statistically significant difference between groups (810.145, p = 0.000). When construct and concurrent validity was tested, it was demonstrated a statistically significant difference between MABC-2 motor tests, Checklist and DQDQ BR, being (F (2.177) = 810.145, p = 0.000). The post-hoc Tukey test revealed a significant difference between the motor evaluation tests of MABC-2, DCDQ-BR questionnaire and MABC-2 Checklist completed by children's responsible and teachers, these being (p = 0.000) for all cases. Using data obtained in this study, we can conclude that the translation of the instrument is valid, but the diagnosis was made through the instrument MABC-2 Checklist showed no accuracy when trying to identify children with motor problems. It is suggested that future studies consider to develop a national and / or regional reference tables, and also consider different tables for responsible, teachers and other groups that may answer the instrument.
A bateria de testes de avaliação motora Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (MABC-2), composta por testes motores e um questionário (MABC-2 Checklist), tem sido usada e testada em diversas nacionalidades para identificar crianças com problemas motores. Porém, em virtude de diferenças culturais entre o país de origem do protocolo (Reino Unido) e algumas culturas onde o protocolo foi utilizado (Austrália, Espanha e Japão), percebeu-se a necessidade de mais estudos e de adequações em algumas partes do teste para o uso nestes países. O presente estudo teve como proposta validar parte do MABC-2; o Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition Checklist para a língua portuguesa. Foi realizada a tradução do instrumento para o português brasileiro através de um procedimento padrão de tradução, retrotradução e julgamento dessas por um comitê de especialistas composto por 4 mestres e 7 doutores. O grupo de especialistas examinou a versão original e traduzida para verificar a concordância entre as versões e sugerir modificações. Foram feitas adaptações em consenso com o comitê de especialistas, sendo definido uma versão Pré-Final; que em seguida foi testada. Responderam ao instrumento, 40 responsáveis e 16 professores (14 regentes e 2 de Educação Física). Os responsáveis também responderam o questionário DCDQ-BR. Foram avaliados com os testes motores do instrumento MABC-2, 98 escolares com idades entre 7 e 10 anos, de ambos os sexos. A versão final do instrumento MABC-2 Checklist apresentou elevado índice de consistência interna com Alfa igual a 0,953; resultado apontado como sendo excelente. Embora o instrumento tenha se apresentado válido, ele não apresentou um alto grau de fidedignidade no teste de fidedignidade entre avaliadores, evidenciando uma diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos (810,145, p=0,000). Quando posto à prova as validades de constructo e concorrente, ficou evidenciada uma diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os testes MABC-2 motor, Checklist e DQDQ-BR sendo (F(2,177) = 810,145, p=0,000). O teste post-hoc Tukey revelou que houve diferença significativa entre os testes de avaliação motora do MABC-2, o questionário DCDQ-BR e o MABC-2 Checklist respondido por responsáveis e professores, sendo estes (p=0,000) para todos os casos. Através dos dados obtidos neste estudo, pode-se concluir que a tradução do instrumento é válida, porém o diagnóstico realizado através do instrumento MABC-2 Checklist não apresentou exatidão ao tentar identificar crianças com problemas motores. Sugere-se que em estudos futuros seja considerado o desenvolvimento de tabelas de referência nacional e/ou regional para o instrumento; bem como tabelas de referência diferenciada para responsáveis, professores e demais grupos que venham responder o instrumento.
Valdifiori, Marika. "Strumentazione mediante sensori inerziali di test per la valutazione della funzione grafo-motoria in età evolutiva: studi preliminari." Bachelor's thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2017.
Find full textChen, Hung-Yi, and 陳虹伊. "The Motor Ability of Children with Functional Articulation Disorders: The Comparison of BOT-2 and Movement-ABC." Thesis, 2009. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02029502736210655600.
Full text國立成功大學
物理治療研究所
97
Background and Purposes: Children with functional articulation disorders (FAD) are characterized with articulation and sound production deficits. Articulation and sound production depends on activation and coordination of many muscles and vocal structures. It could be considered as one type of motor coordination tasks. Inconclusive results were noted in the literature regarding if children with functional articulation disorders (FAD) have deficits in the motor coordination performance of other parts of body. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, 2nd edition (BOT-2) and Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) are two mostly frequently used assessment tools of motor performance in researches and clinical practices. Whether the scores of these two tests are correlated is seldom examined. The purposes of this study were to answer the questions 1) if children with FAD also had other body parts motor coordination deficit; 2) if the scores of BOT-2 and M-ABC were correlated. Methods: Thirty children with FAD referred from NCKUH (5.40 ± 0.90 years old), and age- and gender-matched typically-developing children recruited from local community participated in the study. Each child first received cognitive assessments (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, PPVT-R and Test of Nonverbal Intelligence 3rd edition, TONI-3) to exclude the possible conditions of insufficient mental ability, and then received motor assessments with BOT-2 and M-ABC in a counterbalanced order. Independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test were adopted for comparison of motor performance between groups. Results: The overall motor performance (total score) was not significantly different between the groups. However, children with FAD had significant lower scores in Fine manual control category of BOT-2 (FAD: 59.60 ± 9.16 vs. TD: 64.93 ± 8.77, p = .026), fine motor precision subtest of BOT-2 (FAD: 18.53 ± 4.22 vs. TD: 21.70 ± 5.09, p = 0.11) and ball skills subtest of M-ABC (Z = -2.256, p = .021). The correlations of the scores of two motor tests and their subtests were fair to good (r = -.264 ~ -.645 ) . Conclusion: Children with FAD present similar overall motor performance except of lower scores of fine motor precision and ball skills. The correlations of scores of two motor tests are only fair to good. Clinical Relevance: Clinical therapists should be cautious that children with FAD may have a comorbid motor problem, especially the fine motor precision and ball skills. Only fair to good correlations of scores of the two most commonly used clinical tests indicates that it should be cautious when choosing a motor test for certain purpose.
Books on the topic "Movement abc-2"
Bauernfeind, Hans. Wie ein Sturmwind: Thomas Graf OSB (1902-1941), 2. Abt von Schweiklberg ; eine Schlüsselfigur in der Liturgischen Bewegung. Münsterschwarzach: Vier-Türme-Verlag, 2005.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Movement abc-2"
Ingram, Haroro, Craig Whiteside, and Charlie Winter. "Zarqawi’s Strategy." In The ISIS Reader, 37–54. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197501436.003.0003.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Movement abc-2"
Дивинский, Б., B. Divinskiy, И. Грюне, I. Gryune, Р. Косьян, and R. Kos'yan. "APPLICATION OF ACOUSTIC METHODS IN RESEARCHES OF THE BOTTOM SEDIMENT DYNAMICS." In Sea Coasts – Evolution ecology, economy. Academus Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31519/conferencearticle_5b5ce3bf36cd71.89536530.
Full textBurge, Leif M., Laurence Chaput-Desrochers, and Richard Guthrie. "Practical Applications of Bed Scour Calculations: Two Case Studies." In 2014 10th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2014-33744.
Full textVerma, Ajay K., John Zanetti, Reza Fazel-Rezai, and Kouhyar Tavakolian. "Pulse Transit Time Derivation Using Xiphoidal and Carotid Seismocardiograms." In 2017 Design of Medical Devices Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/dmd2017-3444.
Full text