Relevant bibliographies by topics / Multicriteria decision method

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Multicriteria decision method'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 14 June 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Multicriteria decision method.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Multicriteria decision method"

1

Piegat, Andrzej, and Wojciech Sałabun. "Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method." Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing 2014 (2014): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/536492.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper presents a new, nonlinear, multicriteria, decision-making method: the characteristic objects (COMET). This approach, which can be characterized as a fuzzy reference model, determines a measurement standard for decision-making problems. This model is distinguished by a constant set of specially chosen characteristic objects that are independent of the alternatives. After identifying a multicriteria model, this method can be used to compare any number of decisional objects (alternatives) and select the best one. In the COMET, in contrast to other methods, the rank-reversal phenomenon is not observed. Rank-reversal is a paradoxical feature in the decision-making methods, which is caused by determining the absolute evaluations of considered alternatives on the basis of the alternatives themselves. In the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and similar methods, when a new alternative is added to the original alternative set, the evaluation base and the resulting evaluations of all objects change. A great advantage of the COMET is its ability to identify not only linear but also nonlinear multicriteria models of decision makers. This identification is based not on a ranking of component criteria of the multicriterion but on a ranking of a larger set of characteristic objects (characteristic alternatives) that are independent of the small set of alternatives analyzed in a given problem. As a result, the COMET is free of the faults of other methods.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Liang, Liang, Ren Yan Jiang, and Yin Liang. "A Multicriteria Decision Method with Uncertain Information in Financial Credit Loan Decision-Making." Applied Mechanics and Materials 52-54 (March 2011): 1868–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.52-54.1868.

Full text
Abstract:
It is difficult to obtain the correct criteria weights with uncertain information in the multicriteria decision-making. Many methods depend on the subjective estimate. Therefore, a method is presented to evaluate the samples ranking only need the importance order of criteria. It evaluates firstly the overall ranking scores of samples based on the graphical classification and multicriteria hierarchical integrated methods. Subsequently, the relation model between the criteria scores and overall ranking scores of samples is built by linear regression. Finally, a fincial credit loan decision-making problem is presented to describe the way of the multicriteria decisiion making process. The analysis to compare with the AHP method illustrates the proposed method is objective and effective.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gogodze, Joseph. "Ranking Methods for Multicriteria Decision-Making: Application to Benchmarking of Solvers and Problems." Scientific Programming 2021 (July 11, 2021): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5513860.

Full text
Abstract:
Evaluating the performance assessments of solvers (e.g., for computation programs), known as the solver benchmarking problem, has become a topic of intense study, and various approaches have been discussed in the literature. Such a variety of approaches exist because a benchmark problem is essentially a multicriteria problem. In particular, the appropriate multicriteria decision-making problem can correspond naturally to each benchmark problem and vice versa. In this study, to solve the solver benchmarking problem, we apply the ranking-theory method recently proposed for solving multicriteria decision-making problems. The benchmarking problem of differential evolution algorithms was considered for a case study to illustrate the ability of the proposed method. This problem was solved using ranking methods from different areas of origin. The comparisons revealed that the proposed method is competitive and can be successfully used to solve benchmarking problems and obtain relevant engineering decisions. This study can help practitioners and researchers use multicriteria decision-making approaches for benchmarking problems in different areas, particularly software benchmarking.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Simanavičienė, Rūta, and Jovita Cibulskaitė. "Statistical Analysis of the Reliability of a Decision Obtained by the TOPSIS Method." Lietuvos statistikos darbai 54, no. 1 (2019): 110–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/ljs.2015.13886.

Full text
Abstract:
The tasks of making the most appropriate decisions taking into account a number of criteria are dealt with in variousfields such as engineering, industry, finance, economics and others. If the aim is to arrange the alternatives in a priority lineaccording to quantitative attributes, then multiattribute decision-making methods are suitable. Analysts using these methods usuallydo not take into account initial data errors – deviations in attribute values, in which case the decision may be unreliable. In thisarticle, several statistical analysis methods are proposed for the multicriteria decision to measure reliability: formulation of statisticalhypotheses and calculation of confidence intervals for parameters. Based on statistical analysis results, conclusions about thereliability of a multicriteria decision obtained using the TOPSIS method are formulated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

OPRICOVIC, SERAFIM, and GWO-HSHIUNG TZENG. "DEFUZZIFICATION WITHIN A MULTICRITERIA DECISION MODEL." International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 11, no. 05 (2003): 635–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218488503002387.

Full text
Abstract:
In many cases, criterion values are crisp in nature, and their values are determined by economic instruments, mathematical models, and/or by engineering measurement. However, there are situations when the evaluation of alternatives must include the imprecision of established criteria, and the development of a fuzzy multicriteria decision model is necessary to deal with either "qualitative" (unquantifiable or linguistic) or incomplete information. The proposed fuzzy multicriteria decision model (FMCDM) consists of two phases: the CFCS phase - Converting the Fuzzy data into Crisp Scores, and the MCDM phase - MultiCriteria Decision Making. This model is applicable for defuzzification within the MCDM model with a mixed set of crisp and fuzzy criteria. A newly developed CFCS method is based on the procedure of determining the left and right scores by fuzzy min and fuzzy max, respectively, and the total score is determined as a weighted average according to the membership functions. The advantage of this defuzzification method is illustrated by some examples, comparing the results from three considered methods.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Šarka, Vaidotas, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, and Leonas Ustinovičius. "METHOD OF PROJECT MULTICRITERIA DECISION SYNTHESIS ON THE BASIS OF DECISION SUCCESS CRITERION/PROJEKTŲ DAUGIAKRITERINIŲ SPRENDIMŲ SINTEZĖS REMIANTIS PRIIMAMO SPRENDIMO SĖKMĖS KRITERIJUMI METODAS." JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 6, no. 3 (2000): 193–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13921525.2000.10531586.

Full text
Abstract:
Method of project multicriteria decision synthesis with decision success criterion is used for realisation of construction projects which require a proper analysis of constituent parts in close relationship of components. Scheme of this method is presented in Fig 3. Multicriteria decision project may be divided into several interrelated building processes and smaller projects. On every level of the whole project, the decision of closeness to ideal solution method is made and, on the basis of the obtained results, several alternatives are chosen. On every separate level, a number of alternatives is selected by the method user. It depends on complexity of the project and on requirements of interested parties. At the last decision stage, there is performed a synthesis using the chosen alternatives and relying on their interrelations. During decision process on the intermediate stages, having eliminated irrational alternatives, effective and precise results are achieved. The developed multicriteria decision synthesis method is one of the elements of the newly created group of multicriteria decision methods. Using this method algorithm, software is prepared that entirely manages the whole decision process from database filling to calculation and result processing.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Gheorghe, R. A., A. Bufardi, and P. Xirouchakis. "Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Aid Method for Conceptual Design." CIRP Annals 54, no. 1 (2005): 151–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60071-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Pankratova, N. D., and N. I. Nedashkovskaya. "Hybrid Method of Multicriteria Evaluation of Decision Alternatives." Cybernetics and Systems Analysis 50, no. 5 (2014): 701–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10559-014-9660-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Cables, E., M. T. Lamata, and J. L. Verdegay. "RIM-reference ideal method in multicriteria decision making." Information Sciences 337-338 (April 2016): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.12.011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Witteman, Holly O., Ruth Ndjaboue, Gratianne Vaisson, et al. "Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Medical Decision Making 41, no. 7 (2021): 801–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989x211037946.

Full text
Abstract:
Background Patient decision aids should help people make evidence-informed decisions aligned with their values. There is limited guidance about how to achieve such alignment. Purpose To describe the range of values clarification methods available to patient decision aid developers, synthesize evidence regarding their relative merits, and foster collection of evidence by offering researchers a proposed set of outcomes to report when evaluating the effects of values clarification methods. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Study Selection We included articles that described randomized trials of 1 or more explicit values clarification methods. From 30,648 records screened, we identified 33 articles describing trials of 43 values clarification methods. Data Extraction Two independent reviewers extracted details about each values clarification method and its evaluation. Data Synthesis Compared to control conditions or to implicit values clarification methods, explicit values clarification methods decreased the frequency of values-incongruent choices (risk difference, –0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.06 to –0.02; P < 0.001) and decisional conflict (standardized mean difference, –0.20; 95% CI, –0.29 to –0.11; P < 0.001). Multicriteria decision analysis led to more values-congruent decisions than other values clarification methods (χ2 = 9.25, P = 0.01). There were no differences between different values clarification methods regarding decisional conflict (χ2 = 6.08, P = 0.05). Limitations Some meta-analyses had high heterogeneity. We grouped values clarification methods into broad categories. Conclusions Current evidence suggests patient decision aids should include an explicit values clarification method. Developers may wish to specifically consider multicriteria decision analysis. Future evaluations of values clarification methods should report their effects on decisional conflict, decisions made, values congruence, and decisional regret.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Multicriteria decision method"

1

Dur, Fatih Çelik H. Murat. "The Usage Of Stochastic And Multicriteria Decision-Aid Methods Evaluating Geothermal Energy Exploitation Projects/." [s.l.]: [s.n.], 2005. http://library.iyte.edu.tr/tezler/master/sehirplanlama/T000324.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Master)--İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir, 2005.
Keywords: Geothermal energy, multi criteria decision method, stochastic methods, Monte Carlo method. Includes bibliographical references (leaves.93-98).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Staedelin, Marie. "Methodological approaches for the benefit-risk assessment of medicinal products in European regulatory decision-making : a special emphasis on the MultiCriteria Decision Analysis "MCDA” Method a quantitative approach." Thesis, Strasbourg, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014STRAJ013.

Full text
Abstract:
L'évaluation des bénéfices et des risques des médicaments joue un rôle central dans la protection de la santé publique. Cependant, et de l’avis général, il apparaît que cette évaluation nécessite d’être revisitée. En 2010, aucun examen n’avait encore été effectué pour déterminer si les méthodes disponibles pouvaient être appliquées à l’évaluation de la balance bénéfice-risque des médicaments dans le cadre réglementaire, et si oui à quel point elles seraient applicable. L’objectif de cette thèse a donc été d’identifier la ou les méthodes pouvant être théoriquement utilisées pour ce type d’évaluation, puis de les confronter à des cas concrets afin d’en déterminer leur applicabilité. Les résultats de l’évaluation des méthodes ont montrés que les méthodes les plus appropriées sont la méthode d’aide à la décision multicritère (MCDA) ainsi que ses variantes. Les résultats de l'application pratique de la méthode MCDA ont indiqué que cette méthode peut être utilisé dans les scénarios communs d'enregistrement en Europe. Cependant il convient de noter que cette méthode ne fournit ni une recette « prête à l'emploi » pour exécuter cette évaluation ni une réponse directe
The benefit-risk evaluation of new medicines plays a central role in safeguarding public health. Nevertheless, it seems that the benefit-risk evaluation calls for further improvement. In 2010, no review had been performed of how available benefit-risk assessment methods could be applied for a regulatory benefit-risk assessment and how feasible that would be when facing real-life cases. The objective of this thesis has thus been to identify method(s) that could be theoretically used for such an assessment, and then to confront it/them to real-life cases, in order to determine their applicability. The results of the methods evaluation showed that the most suitable methods for a regulatory benefit-risk assessment of medicinal products are the MCDA method and the MCDA based methods. The results of the practical application of the MCDA indicated that the method could be used for medicinal products registered through a common registration scenario in Europe. However it should be noted that this method provides neither a “ready-made” recipe to perform an assessment nor a direct answer
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Eppe, Stefan. "Three contributions to the PROMETHEE II method." Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/209033.

Full text
Abstract:
PROMETHEE II is a widely used outranking method in the field of multi criteria decision aid (MCDA) method. The method outputs a ranking of a considered set of alternatives, based on the computation of net flow scores.

In this thesis, aggregating several published journal articles and conference papers, we propose three contributions that relate to the method: 1) Outranking methods are based on the pairwise comparison of all considered alternatives, yielding a quadratic time complexity for evaluating the net flow scores. We propose a method for reducing to a linear time complexity and show that it offers good results; 2) Determining preference parameters, i.e. relative weights for each criterion, is not a trivial task. We propose two complementary approaches to eliciting preferences, based on the aggregation-disaggregation paradigm; 3) The phenomenon of rank reversal, that also affects the PROMETHEE II method, is often considered as problematic in the MCDA community. We formalise the exact conditions for rank reversal to occur with PROMETHEE II when adding or removing one or more alternatives to the original set. These conditions lead to the exact bound of rank reversal, a way to determine the actions that actually provoke rank reversal and two associated metrics that should be useful for concrete applications.
Doctorat en Sciences de l'ingénieur
info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Soares, Nilson Lopes. "Análise da gestão ambiental em estaleiro naval através do apoio multicritério à decisão." Universidade Federal Fluminense, 2017. https://app.uff.br/riuff/handle/1/5495.

Full text
Abstract:
Submitted by Joana Azevedo (joanad@id.uff.br) on 2018-01-09T17:05:27Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissert Nilson L Soares.pdf: 2456381 bytes, checksum: 04ac4fa2402176f3e9bb4d6b404f30a0 (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Biblioteca da Escola de Engenharia (bee@ndc.uff.br) on 2018-01-12T12:12:02Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissert Nilson L Soares.pdf: 2456381 bytes, checksum: 04ac4fa2402176f3e9bb4d6b404f30a0 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-12T12:12:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissert Nilson L Soares.pdf: 2456381 bytes, checksum: 04ac4fa2402176f3e9bb4d6b404f30a0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-11-07
Muitos são os problemas enfrentados pelas indústrias para atender as legislações e normas vigentes no país. Especificamente em estaleiros navais, o atendimento à legislação ambiental é ainda maior, dada a natureza da atividade. Este ramo industrial está diretamente relacionado com o meio ambiente. Esta pesquisa apresenta um estudo sobre as práticas de gerenciamento ambiental em estaleiros navais, com empregos de critérios elencados por profissionais e especialistas ambientais deste setor industrial. Empregaram-se conjuntamente nesta análise dois métodos de Apoio Multicritério à Decisão, os métodos: AHP – Analytic Hierarchy Process e o TODIM – Tomada de Decisão Interativa Multicritério. Na implementação desta pesquisa obteve-se a ordenação de alternativas, provenientes das ponderações dos critérios propostos por especialistas do setor, e observou-se êxito no emprego dos métodos de Apoio Multicritério à Decisão, verificando-se que podem subsidiar a tomada de decisão auxiliando a gestão ambiental na indústria naval
Many are the problems faced by industries to comply the laws and current standards in the country. Specifically in shipyards, compliance with environmental legislation and even greater the given nature of the activity. This industrial branch is directly related to the environment. This research presents a study of the environmental management practices in shipyards, with jobs of criteria listed by professionals and environmental specialists of this industrial sector. There are two methods of Multiple Criteria Decision that were used in this analysis: AHP - Analytic Hierarchy Process and the TODIM - Interactive Decision Making Multiple Criteria. In the implementation of this research, we obtained the ordering of alternatives derived from the criteria weightings proposed by industry experts, and we found success in the use of Multiple Criteria Decision methods, being verified that they can subsidize the decision making aiding the environmental management in the naval industry.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Vařbuchtová, Marie. "Hodnocení krajů z pohledu vícekriteriálního rozhodování." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2009. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-10402.

Full text
Abstract:
This diploma thesis as is mentioned on its title, deals with confrontation of the single territories of the Czech Republic. Plentitude of data was gathered together in other to make this camparison. These data were chosen with regard to the real--life decisions. Multicriteria decision making methods were used as an instrument for comparison making.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Mota, Pedro Jorge Gomes. "Comparative analysis of multicriteria decision making methods." Master's thesis, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/11263.

Full text
Abstract:
Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia Electrotécnica e de Computadores
The main objective of this dissertation is to perform a Comparative Analysis of different Multicriteria Decision Making Methods applied to real-world problems, in order to produce relevant information to enable the incorporation of those methods on computational platforms. The current document presents a simple case study concerning a decision support application targeted for a real problem regarding retrofitting alternatives of a building with energy efficiency impact. The application process was started with the selection of two Multicriteria Decision Making Methods guided by a preexisting framework, and resulted in the choice of AHP and PROMETHEE II methodologies. These two methods were then combined with three different decision maker profiles (Conservative, Moderate and Aggressive) created by means of risk assessment profiling techniques for portfolio allocation. Afterwards, the chosen decision criteria were disposed in a Risk Pyramid according to their inherent level of risk regarding project evaluation. A match was then performed between the decision maker profiles and each criterion, so as to define a proper set of weights for the decision criteria and preference functions, with corresponding preference and indifference thresholds. Finally, three different sets of results (one for each decision maker profile) were produced using appropriate software, and a Sensitivity Analysis was performed over the criteria to understand their influence on the solution. The general conclusion of this Comparative Analysis is that the increase in the preference modelling ability of the methods brings up the least expected alternatives as recommendations for the decision maker. Besides, we have concluded that the decision profiles that allocate bigger weights to the riskiest criteria are the ones that produce the more dispersed set of results within each method application and within each decision maker profile.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Machková, Radka. "Hodnocení vybraných států EU." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2010. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-75293.

Full text
Abstract:
This diploma thesis targets the evaluation of fifteen chosen EU countries using the methods of multicriteria decision-making. The topic is elaborated from the perspective of a student of the University of Economics, Prague, who chooses a suitable country to gain experience abroad. Students' preferences are recorded in a questionnaire and grouped using direct weights estimation method. The ORESTE, WSA, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE II and MAPPAC methods are described in the thesis and applied to the data using an add-on of Microsoft Excel -- Sanna. Since the questionnaire contains a question on the students' subjective ranking of countries, it is possible to compare the two rankings (subjective and calculated) to determine whether they are comparable and the students' decision-making is consistent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Pereira, Rodrigo Lemos. "Uso de método de decisão multi-critério para seleção de um fornecedor de moldes para fundição de autopeças." Universidade de Taubaté, 2011. http://www.bdtd.unitau.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=315.

Full text
Abstract:
The complexity in the vehicles production process is due mainly to the large number of Assembled components that are generally characterized by a high technological content. The castings, one of these components, fit perfectly in this category and they only can be made at a competitive quality and cost level if a proper tooling is available. The molds and dies manufacturing process requires modern computer technologies and materials of high reliability and performance. Although made to mass production, toolings are unique products whose manufacturing requires technical knowledge and familiarity with the casting process where they will be employed. The selection of a casting tooling supplier is usually a complicated and time- consuming issue. The decision process is based on several criteria that can be conflicting or superposed, objective or subjective. In the present paper the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to select a tooling supplier for the manufacturing of a transmission housing by the die casting process. Several qualitative and quantitative criteria for the tooling supplier selection were identified through the technical literature review and discussion with foundry specialists. Subsequently, the criteria hierarchy was established in three levels and comparison matrixes were developed to determine the priorities among them. The consistency ratio for each matrix was calculated and the final score of each potential supplier was determined. The study was concluded with a sensitivity analysis that contributed to confirm the choice of the selected supplier. The application of the methodology improved the selection process by reducing the subjectivity and by weighing the major selection criteria.
A complexidade no processo de produção de veículos deve-se, entre outras razões, aos inúmeros componentes utilizados na montagem, que em geral tem elevado conteúdo tecnológico. Os fundidos enquadram-se perfeitamente nesta categoria e somente podem ser produzidos com qualidade e custo competitivo com o emprego de moldes apropriados. A fabricação destes moldes é feita usando-se modernas tecnologias computacionais e materiais de alto desempenho e confiabilidade. Embora destinados à produção em massa, cada molde é um produto único cuja manufatura requer conhecimento técnico específico e familiaridade com o processo de fundição onde serão utilizados. A escolha de um fornecedor para moldes de fundição é normalmente um problema complicado e que consome tempo, a análise envolve múltiplos critérios, que podem ser conflitantes ou superpostos, objetivos ou subjetivos. O objetivo deste trabalho é mostrar a utilização do processo hierárquico analítico (AHP) para selecionar um fornecedor de um molde para uso no processo de fundição sob pressão, para produção de uma carcaça de transmissão. Através da revisão de literatura técnica e contatos com especialistas, diversos critérios qualitativos e quantitativos foram identificados para a escolha do fornecedor. Posteriormente estes critérios foram hierarquizados em três níveis e as prioridades entre eles identificadas em matrizes de comparação. A seguir, calculou-se a razão de consistência para cada uma das matrizes e obteve-se o escore final de cada fornecedor em potencial. O estudo foi concluído com uma análise de sensibilidade, que contribuiu para ratificar a escolha do fornecedor selecionado. A aplicação do método melhorou o processo de seleção pela redução da subjetividade e pela ponderação dos critérios julgados importantes em um fabricante de moldes complexos.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Moura, Luciana de Mendonça Santos Braatz. "Aplicação de método AHP para priorização de processos gerenciais na adoção de sistemas de gestão integrada no setor da construção civil: estudo aplicado em uma construtora." Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2014. https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/3752.

Full text
Abstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T19:52:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 5891.pdf: 12093424 bytes, checksum: 2f4be2e6dd8f12b62c9c9f9c787c2888 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-02-19
Considering the representativeness of the Construction sector in the national economy, there is an increase in demand for the use and adaptation of concepts, techniques and methods developed for the manufacturing environment aiming to improve the production and management performance of companies. The use of information systems, especially ERP, has being the focus of several studies in the last decade. Thus, it is considered that the matter "ERPs" for construction, specifically considering the use of methods of decision making with multiple criteria, is far from being fully consolidated, and this research contributes to society and the academic community to enrich this discussion. The main objective of this work is to apply a form of prioritization of management processes to assist the selection of ERP system in construction company aimed at improving the flow of information held between the management system and production system, providing improved management processes management. The method of making multiple decision criteria provided AHP prioritization processes that must be considered in the selection and adoption of an ERP. The research supports the view of many studies that link the analysis of the internal processes of a company as relevant to the adoption of management information systems, as these should be oriented to business processes and not the opposite. Considering the importance of the issues raised by the analysis of the proposed case, the prioritization process, systematized by applying the AHP method can be considered as one (and not only) the guidelines in the selection of ERP systems available in the market process.
Considerando a representatividade do setor da Construção Civil na economia nacional, observa-se um aumento na demanda pela utilização e adaptação de conceitos, técnicas e métodos desenvolvidos para o ambiente de manufatura visando aprimorar o desempenho produtivo e gerencial das empresas. A utilização de sistemas de informação, em especial o ERP, está sendo o foco de diversas pesquisas nesta última década. Desta forma, considera-se que a temática adoção de ERP para Construção Civil pesada, especificamente considerando o uso de métodos de tomada de decisão com múltiplos critérios, encontra-se distante de estar completamente consolidada, e assim, a presente pesquisa contribui para a sociedade e para a comunidade acadêmica com o enriquecimento desta discussão. O objetivo principal deste trabalho é aplicar uma forma de priorização dos processos gerenciais para auxiliar a seleção de sistema ERP na indústria da construção civil pesada visando à melhoria do fluxo de informações realizado entre o sistema gerencial e o sistema de produção, proporcionando melhoria nos processos de gestão gerencial. O método de tomada de decisão múltiplos critérios AHP proporcionou a priorização de processos que devem ser considerados na seleção e adoção de um sistema ERP. A pesquisa corrobora a visão de diversos estudos que apontam a análise dos processos internos de uma empresa como relevante para a adoção de sistemas de informação gerenciais, pois estes devem ser orientados aos processos da empresa e não o inverso. Considerando a relevância dos aspectos levantados pela análise do caso proposto, a priorização de processos, sistematizada através da aplicação do método AHP, pode ser considerada como uma (e não a única) das diretrizes no processo de seleção de sistemas ERP disponíveis no mercado.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Tufekci, Nesrin. "Gis Based Geothermal Potential Assessment For Western Anatolia." Master's thesis, METU, 2006. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12607651/index.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis aims to predict the probable undiscovered geothermal systems through investigation of spatial relation between geothermal occurrences and its surrounding geological phenomenon in Western Anatolia. In this context, four different public data, which are epicenter map, lineament map, Bouger gravity anomaly and magnetic anomaly maps, are utilized. In order to extract the necessary information for each map layer the raw public data is converted to a synthetic data which are directly used in the analysis. Synthetic data employed during the investigation process include Gutenberg-Richter b-value map, distance to lineaments map and distance to major grabens present in the area. Thus, these three layers including directly used magnetic anomaly maps are combined by means of Boolean logic model and Weights of Evidence method (WofE), which are multicriteria decision methods, in a Geographical Information System (GIS) environment. Boolean logic model is based on the simple logic of Boolean operators, while the WofE model depends on the Bayesian probability. Both of the methods use binary maps for their analysis. Thus, the binary map classification is the key point of the analysis. In this study three different binary map classification techniques are applied and thus three output maps were obtained for each of the method. The all resultant maps are evaluated within and among the methods by means of success indices. The findings reveal that the WofE method is better predictor than the Boolean logic model and that the third binarization approach, which is named as optimization procedure in this study, is the best estimator of binary classes due to obtained success indices. Finally, three output maps of each method are combined and the favorable areas in terms of geothermal potential are produced. According to the final maps the potential sites appear to be Aydin, Denizli and Manisa, of which first two have been greatly explored and exploited since today and thus not surprisingly found as potential in the output maps, while Manisa when compared to first two is nearly virgin.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Multicriteria decision method"

1

Das, Indraneel. Normal-boundary intersection: An alternate method for generating Pareto optimal points in multicriteria optimization problems. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1996.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Doumpos, Michael. Multicriteria decision aid classification methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Constantin, Zopounidis, ed. Multicriteria decision aid classification methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

I, Dimitras Augustinos, ed. Multicriteria decision aid methods for the prediction of business failure. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Zopounidis, Constantin. Multicriteria Decision Aid Methods for the Prediction of Business Failure. Springer US, 1998.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zopounidis, Constantin, and Augustinos I. Dimitras. Multicriteria Decision Aid Methods for the Prediction of Business Failure. Springer US, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2885-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hobbs, Benjamin F. Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multicriteria Methods. Springer US, 2000.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

1946-, Meier Peter, ed. Energy decisions and the environment: A guide to the use of multicriteria methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

1939-, Dennis J. E., and Langley Research Center, eds. Normal-boundary intersection: An alternate method for generating pareto optimal points in multicriteria optimization problems. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1996.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Normal-boundary intersection: An alternate method for generating pareto optimal points in multicriteria optimization problems. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1996.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Multicriteria decision method"

1

Zheng, Jun, Olivier Cailloux, and Vincent Mousseau. "Constrained Multicriteria Sorting Method Applied to Portfolio Selection." In Algorithmic Decision Theory. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24873-3_25.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bouzayane, Sarra, and Inès Saad. "Multicriteria Decision Aid Method for Knowledge Sharing." In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Munier, Nolberto. "The SIMUS Method." In A Strategy for Using Multicriteria Analysis in Decision-Making. Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1512-7_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cables, E., M. T. Lamata, and J. L. Verdegay. "FRIM—Fuzzy Reference Ideal Method in Multicriteria Decision Making." In Soft Computing Applications for Group Decision-making and Consensus Modeling. Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60207-3_19.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Trinkaus, Hans L. "knowCube — a Spreadsheet Method for Interactive Multicriteria Decision Making." In Operations Research Proceedings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17022-5_62.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan, and Chiranjeev Kumar. "A Multicriteria Decision-Making Method for Cloud Service Selection and Ranking." In Advances in Computer and Computational Sciences. Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3773-3_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wątróbski, Jarosław, Jarosław Jankowski, and Zbigniew Piotrowski. "The Selection of Multicriteria Method Based on Unstructured Decision Problem Description." In Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications. Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11289-3_46.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Beliakov, Gleb. "Method of Ideal Solution in Fuzzy Set Theory and Multicriteria Decision Making." In PRICAI 2000 Topics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44533-1_83.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Tenório, Fabricio Maione, Marcos dos Santos, Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes, and Jean de Carvalho Araujo. "Navy Warship Selection and Multicriteria Analysis: The THOR Method Supporting Decision Making." In Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56920-4_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Dell’Ovo, Marta, Eduarda Asfora Frej, Alessandra Oppio, Stefano Capolongo, Danielle Costa Morais, and Adiel Teixeira de Almeida. "Multicriteria Decision Making for Healthcare Facilities Location with Visualization Based on FITradeoff Method." In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57487-5_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Multicriteria decision method"

1

Marcondes, Guilherme. "Multicriteria Decision Method for Project Ranking Considering Uncertainty." In 10th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0010183601230128.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Paula Cabral Seixas Costa, Ana, Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, and Luiz F. Autran M. Gomes. "Priorities Assignment for Information Systems Based on Todim Multicriteria Method." In 2002 Informing Science + IT Education Conference. Informing Science Institute, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/2463.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper presents how to select modules of an information system, applying a multicriteria decision approach, using the interactive multicriteria decision making method - TODIM. The problem is to assign priorities for information modules in the planning stage of information systems. These priorities should be attributed in agreement with the decision makers’ preferences, considering the impact on strategic factors and operational aspects of processes, as examples of criteria. The TODIM method is based on the prospect theory and has the technical resources to minimise the possibility of occurrence of the reversion order. It also allows the multicriteria decision approach a group of interdependent actions; this method uses the additive difference model to determine the ranking of an alternative over another one. An analytical structure is proposed to incorporate the multicriteria TODIM method, integrated with the information system planning methodology. Strategic factors and operational aspects of processes are integrated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lahdelma, R., and P. Salminen. "A Method for Ordinal Classification in Multicriteria Decision Making." In Artificial Intelligence and Applications. ACTAPRESS, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2316/p.2010.674-065.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ruicheng, Yang, Guo Rongrong, and Shen Qing. "Detecting Fraudulent Financial Data Using Multicriteria Decision Aid Method." In 2016 3rd International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icisce.2016.78.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kong, Feng, and Hongyan Liu. "The Relative Grey Relation Closeness Multicriteria Decision Making Method." In Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. IEEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isda.2006.51.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zeng-Tai Gong and Yan Ma. "Multicriteria fuzzy decision making method under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment." In 2009 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icmlc.2009.5212362.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wang, Sichun. "A Constructive Method of Multicriteria Decision Functions Based on GP Algorithm." In 2009 International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering (BIFE). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/bife.2009.36.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Wibowo, Santoso, Hepu Deng, and Xibao Zhang. "Fuzzy multicriteria decision support for solid waste disposal method and site selection." In 2014 IEEE 9th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iciea.2014.6931455.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ye, Jun. "Multicriteria Fuzzy Decision-Making Method Based on the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cross-Entropy." In 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ihmsc.2009.23.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Casanovas, Montserrat, and Jose M. Merigo. "A new decision making method with uncertain induced aggregation operators." In 2011 Ieee Symposium On Computational Intelligence In Multicriteria Decision-Making - Part Of 17273 - 2011 Ssci. IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/smdcm.2011.5949284.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography