Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'Narrative interviews'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Narrative interviews.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Narrative interviews"
1
Rozhdestvenskaya, Elena Yu. "INTER-Encyclopedia: Narrative Interview." Inter 12, no. 4 (2020): 114–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/inter.2020.12.4.8.
Full textAbstract:
The article describes the methodology and technique for conducting a narrative interview, as well as its analysis. The narrative interview method is presented from the perspective of a broader narrative approach based on communicative forms of storytelling. In the range of concepts of the narrative approach, the author considers the event, their selection, sequence, segmentation, linearization, coherence, the instance of the narrator, the double time perspective of the narrating I and the narrated I. The methodology of narrative interviewing by F. Schutze is presented, as well as his concept of analyzing the transcript of a narrative interview. G. Rosenthal's approach to the analysis of narrative interviews, as well as the basic principles of thematic or meaningful analysis of narratives are described.
2
Murdoch, Jamie, Charlotte Salter, Jane Cross, and Fiona Poland. "Misunderstandings, communicative expectations and resources in illness narratives: Insights from beyond interview transcripts." Communication and Medicine 10, no. 2 (2014): 153–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cam.v10i2.153.
Full textAbstract:
Interactional misunderstandings in interviews are often glossed over in analysing narratives, so overlooking important clues about how interactants frame the interview discussion. Such misunderstandings will influence ongoing talk, shaping knowledge researchers produce about participants. We discuss whether interpretations of illness narratives may be enhanced if we analyse misunderstandings in conjunction with other contextually-available data not visible within interview transcripts. Using research interviews with people with asthma, we adopted linguistic ethnographic methods to analyse the manifestation and specific consequences of interactional tensions and misunderstandings between interviewer and interviewee. Misunderstandings can indicate inequalities in communicative expectations and discursive resources available to interactants, which may lead to participants’ talk being inappropriately identified as indicating a particular narrative. Incorporating ethnographic contextual features may make visible pertinent discourses not overtly evident within interviews. This may help theorise interview talk, like health and illness narratives, as manifesting within cycles of discourse that will intersect differently in each interaction.
3
Miglbauer, Marlene. "“…because I’m just a stupid woman from an ngo”: Interviews and the interplay between constructions of gender and professional identity." Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 22, no. 2 (2012): 327–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.2.07mig.
Full textAbstract:
Over the last decade, using interviews to analyse identity construction has been gaining in popularity (de Fina 2003; Johnson 2006; Baynham 2011) and, given this interest, analysing identities has become a much debated issue that is being approached from various angles. Regarding interviews as interaction between the interviewee and interviewer, and stories in the interviews as emerging from interactional dynamics (de Fina 2009), this paper draws attention to the emergence of identity at different levels. First, identities emerge at the level of the interview narrative, which is ongoing talk as it evolves in real time and consists of reporting facts, giving opinions on, and explaining aspects of, various topics to the interviewer. Second, identities emerge in stories which are included in the ongoing talk. Stories refer to actions in the past, usually told in chronological order. In contrast to interview narratives which are initiated by the interviewer, stories in interviews are primarily instigated by the interviewees to further support their identity co-construction in the interview setting. The interview setting is thus the third level of identity construction in interviews. By applying the framework of identities occurring at different levels in interviews and Positioning Theory (Harré and van Langenhove 1999), this paper analyses the construction of professional gender identities in the workplace, the interplay between these identities, and the dependence of these constructions on the ‘interview as context’. The stories themselves reveal how, in the workplace, there may be a conflict between professional and gender identities. More specifically such stories make visible the way in which interviewees construct their professional identities in order to resist gender identities that are projected onto them.
4
Perrino, Sabina. "Chronotopes of story and storytelling event in interviews." Language in Society 40, no. 1 (2011): 91–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0047404510000916.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractNarratives in interviews involve the alignment of two chronotopes (Bakhtin's term, literally ‘time-space’) or what has traditionally been termed the narrated and narrating events. While narrators are expected to separate the there-and-then narrated-event chronotope from the here-and-now narrating-event chronotope, tropic forms of coeval alignment exist that erase or blur the line between the two events, as if they were occurring in the same time and place. In this article I argue for the need to map these shifting alignments in interviews. This article begins with, but then moves beyond, the familiar case of the “historical present,” where narrators shift into using nonpast temporal deixis for past events. Drawing first on an oral narrative from Italy, I show how resources besides the historical present can produce similar alignment effects. In order to demonstrate more extreme forms of coeval alignment, I then compare these data with those from a Senegalese narrator in Dakar who transposes participants “into” his stories. Through this comparison I illustrate how cross-chronotope alignment reveals the way narrators manage the relationship between story and event in interviews. Mapping these shifting alignments can help illuminate the emergent relations between interviewer and interviewee and hence show how stories reflect and shape the interview context in which they occur. (Narrative, interview, chronotope, historical present, Italian, Senegal)*
5
Chahal, Aksh. "Interviews in qualitative health care research." Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia 11, no. 1 (2021): 218–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.v11i1.3450.
Full textAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: Interview is a conversation to procure information where an interviewer performs the action of questioning and an interviewee responds to the asked questions. The widely used modes are ‘Face-to-Face Interview’, ‘Telephonic Interview’, and ‘Interview via Electronic/Multimedia’ approach. Information acquisitions via interviews have proved their practicality under a wide range of considerations and aspects in domains of healthcare, social sciences, management, etc. Proper selection of the method right from planning, and establishment deliver the required information to the interviewer in the best expressible, and documented form to deliver results bringing the best after a whole planned workout of an interview. OBJECTIVE: In the present article, the author would be focused on the interview categorization in qualitative health care research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Only PubMed and SCOPUS Databases were searched from inception to September 2020 for this narrative review. Only English language articles were searched with keywords, “Interview”, “Face-to-Face”, “Qualitative research” and “Category of Interview” and linked with Boolean words such as, “AND”, “OR” and “NOT”. Conference abstracts and proceedings articles were excluded. This narrative review did not followed PRISMA statement. RESULTS: The selection of interviews to be used in qualitative health care research should be based on time allocation, gender, prioritization of privacy, and requirement of the content of information. The interviewer should ask one question at a time, present with normalcy in facial and body expression following response even after noting the answers to be unpredictable and encourage the response rate to the highest for optimizing the results obtained. CONCLUSION: Various important aspects of interview in qualitative health care research has been discussed in this narrative review.
6
Nasheeda, Aishath, Haslinda Binti Abdullah, Steven Eric Krauss, and Nobaya Binti Ahmed. "Transforming Transcripts Into Stories: A Multimethod Approach to Narrative Analysis." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18 (January 1, 2019): 160940691985679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1609406919856797.
Full textAbstract:
Stories are essential realities from our past and present. As the primary sources of data in narrative research, interview transcripts play an essential role in giving meaning to the personal stories of research participants. The pragmatic narratives found in transcripts represent human experience as it unfolds. Analyzing the narratives found in interview transcripts thus moves beyond providing descriptions and thematic developments as found in most qualitative studies. Crafting stories from interview transcripts involves a complex set of analytic processes. Building on the first author's personal experience in working on a doctoral thesis employing narrative inquiry, this article presents a multimethod restorying framework to narrative analysis. A step-by-step progression within the framework includes choosing interview participants, transcribing interviews, familiarizing oneself with the transcripts (elements of holistic-content reading), chronologically plotting (elements of the story), use of follow-up interviews as a way to collaborate (an important procedure in narrative inquiry), and developing the story through structural analysis. It is hoped that this article will encourage other researchers embarking on narrative analysis to become creative in presenting participants’ lived experiences through meaningful, collaborative strategies. This article demonstrates the fluidity of narrative analysis and emphasizes that there is no single procedure to be followed in attempting to create stories from interview transcripts.
7
Brannen, Julia. "Life Story Talk: Some Reflections on Narrative in Qualitative Interviews." Sociological Research Online 18, no. 2 (2013): 48–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.2884.
Full textAbstract:
The paper draws on the author's interview experiences and interrogates the conditions in which research interviews generate narratives and storytelling; interviews that do not invite storytelling and interviews where people were asked to give a life story. First, the paper considers the question as to what provokes storytelling. It suggests that people engage with the narrative mode to some extent under the conditions of their own choosing. Second, it examines the processes by which mean making is achieved in storytelling and made sense of by the research analyst. Contrasting two cases of Irish migrants, drawn from a study of fatherhood across three generations in Polish, Irish and white British families, the paper then considers issues of analysis. The argument is made that sociological qualitative research has to engage with narrative analysis and that this involves a close examination not only of what is told and not told but also the forms in which stories are told (the structuring of stories and their linguistic nuances), and the methods by which the interviewee draws in and persuades the listener. Lastly and most importantly, the paper concludes that attention should be made to talk and context in equal measure. It considers the importance of contextualisation of interview data contemporaneously and historically and the methodological strategies through which the researchers create second order narratives in the analysis of their research.
8
Tannen, Deborah. "“We’re never been close, we’re very different”." Narrative Inquiry 18, no. 2 (2008): 206–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ni.18.2.03tan.
Full textAbstract:
Drawing on interviews I conducted with women about their sisters, I identify three narrative types: small-n narratives, big-N Narratives and Master Narratives. Small-n narratives are accounts of specific events or interactions that speakers said had occurred with their sisters. Big-N Narratives are the themes speakers developed in telling me about their sisters, and in support of which they told the small-n narratives. Master Narratives are culture-wide ideologies shaping the big-N Narratives. In my sister interviews, an unstated Master Narrative is the assumption that sisters are expected to be close and similar. This Master Narrative explains why nearly all the American women I interviewed organized their discourse around big-N Narratives by which they told me whether, how and why they are close to their sisters or not, and whether, how and why they and their sisters are similar or different. In exploring the interrelationship among these three narrative types, I examine closely the small-n narratives told by two women, with particular attention to the ways that the involvement strategies repetition, dialogue, and details work together to create scenes. Scenes, moreover, anchor the small-n narratives, helping them support the big-N Narratives which are motivated in turn by the culturally-driven Master Narrative.
9
Guerrero González, Silvana, Javier González Riffo, and Silvana Arriagada Anabalón. "Narrative present in the Spanish of Santiago, Chile." Sociolinguistic patterns and processes of convergence and divergence in Spanish 17, no. 2 (2020): 341–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sic.00062.gue.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This investigation revises the use of the narrative present in the materials of the PRESEEA corpus. Based on 54 sociolinguistic interviews, the convergence and divergence of this phenomenon’s use is studied in the Spanish varieties from Santiago, Chile, and Mexico City. We attempt to study variation according to the individuals, economic factors and the presence of syntactic-discursive introductors before verbs, following the methodological guidelines of the Guía de estudios del presente narrativo en los corpus PRESEEA (Guerrero and Arriagada, 2017). In this way, we intend to answer two general questions: (a) why are there individuals who use the narrative present more than others and (b) what functions serve such resource within the narratives in sociolinguistic interviews.
10
Schütze, Fritz, Paul S. Ruppel, and Pradeep Chakkarath. "»Dann stellten wir aber fest: Da sind diese Lebensgeschichten«." Psychologien im Gespräch 30, no. 1 (2022): 88–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2022-1-88.
Full textAbstract:
In diesem Interview mit Fritz Schütze liegt der Fokus auf seiner Arbeit in der qualitativen Forschung und der Entwicklung des autobiografisch-narrativen Interviews. Er beschreibt den Weg hin zur Analyse der Strukturen einer Lebensgeschichte und wie dieser Ansatz in der Soziologie aufgenommen wurde. Dabei schildert er, wie es ist, sich als Außenseiter in der eigenen Disziplin zu fühlen. Schütze erläutert, für wen das autobiografisch-narrative Interview geeignet ist, was es braucht, damit eine Lebensgeschichte erzählt werden kann und mit wem die Durchführung eines narrativen Interviews weniger Erfolg verspricht. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt des Gesprächs ist die Elaboration der Nähe seiner Arbeit zur Psychologie. Worin er Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede sieht, erklärt Schütze insbesondere auch im Hinblick auf die Psychoanalyse. Abschließend nennt er zukünftige Forschungsfelder, die er für das autobiografisch-narrative Interview als besonders relevant ansieht, und betont die soziopolitische Bedeutung autobiografischen Erzählens.