Journal articles: 'Navitoclax'

1

Nor Hisam, Nur Syahidah, Azizah Ugusman, Nor Fadilah Rajab, Mohd Faizal Ahmad, Michael Fenech, Sze Ling Liew, and Nur Najmi Mohamad Anuar. "Combination Therapy of Navitoclax with Chemotherapeutic Agents in Solid Tumors and Blood Cancer: A Review of Current Evidence." Pharmaceutics 13, no. 9 (August 28, 2021): 1353. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13091353.

Full text

Abstract:

Combination therapy emerges as a fundamental scheme in cancer. Many targeted therapeutic agents are developed to be used with chemotherapy or radiation therapy to enhance drug efficacy and reduce toxicity effects. ABT-263, known as navitoclax, mimics the BH3-only proteins of the BCL-2 family and has a high affinity towards pro-survival BCL-2 family proteins (i.e., BCL-XL, BCL-2, BCL-W) to induce cell apoptosis effectively. A single navitoclax action potently ameliorates several tumor progressions, including blood and bone marrow cancer, as well as small cell lung carcinoma. Not only that, but navitoclax alone also therapeutically affects fibrotic disease. Nevertheless, outcomes from the clinical trial of a single navitoclax agent in patients with advanced and relapsed small cell lung cancer demonstrated a limited anti-cancer activity. This brings accumulating evidence of navitoclax to be used concomitantly with other chemotherapeutic agents in several solid and non-solid tumors that are therapeutically benefiting from navitoclax treatment in preclinical studies. Initially, we justify the anti-cancer role of navitoclax in combination therapy. Then, we evaluate the current evidence of navitoclax in combination with the chemotherapeutic agents comprehensively to indicate the primary regulator of this combination strategy in order to produce a therapeutic effect.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kipps, Thomas J., William G. Wierda, Jeffrey A. Jones, Lode J. Swinnen, Jianning Yang, Yue Cui, Todd Busman, Andrew Krivoshik, Sari Enschede, and Rod Humerickhouse. "Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR): A Phase 1 Study In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)." Blood 116, no. 21 (November 19, 2010): 2455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.v116.21.2455.2455.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Abstract 2455 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule, binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. In vitro, navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50 ≤ 1μM) against T and B lymphoid malignancies that over-express Bcl-2. A phase 1 trial demonstrated oral navitoclax monotherapy to be well-tolerated and to have anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, thrombocytopenia (TCP) was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Phase 3 studies showed improved outcomes in CLL pts with the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) combination, and a phase 2 trial showed bendamustine/rituximab (BR) to be effective for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Navitoclax enhanced R (monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy) efficacy in preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma. Methods: This is an ongoing, international, phase 1 dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral navitoclax in combination with FCR (Arm A) or BR (Arm B) in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. Secondary objectives are efficacy endpoints (PFS, ORR, TTP, OS, duration of response). Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance score ≤1, ANC ≥100/μL, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL. Preliminary results are reported. After obtaining informed consent, pts were assigned to Arm A or Arm B based on physician preference, each consisting of 28-day dose-escalation cycles with once-daily, pre-infusion, navitoclax treatment on Days 3–5 of Cycle 1 and Days 1–3 of subsequent cycles. In both arms, R was 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycle 1; and 500 mg/m2 on Day 2 of Cycle 2 and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles. In Arm A, F 25 mg/m2 and C 175 mg/m2 were dosed on Days 2–4 in Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1–3 in subsequent cycles. In Arm B, B was dosed at 70 mg/m2 on Days 2 and 3 of Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1 and 2 in subsequent cycles. Navitoclax starting dose was 110 mg daily. Dose escalation to the next cohort (200 mg) was according to a continuous reassessment model. Tumor responses were evaluated using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Pts could continue on navitoclax therapy for 1 yr in the absence of progressive disease or significant toxicity. Results: As of July 2010, 7 pts enrolled in the initially prioritized Arm B (BR+navitoclax); all completed the first cohort of 110 mg (median age 60 yr [range 55–72]). Study sites are currently enrolling pts in Arm A (FCR+navitoclax); 2 pts have enrolled to date. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–7). One pt had a DLT of elevated AST (Arm B, 110 mg cohort) and 1 pt had a DLT of neutropenic fever (Arm A, 110 mg cohort). In Arm B, neither TCP nor neutropenia have been DLTs. For the 7 pts with navitoclax-related AEs, the most common were diarrhea (3 pts), nausea (5 pts), and fatigue (3 pts). Seven pts remain on study; 2 pts discontinued due to disease progression and 2 withdrew per physician preference. In Arm B, preliminary antitumor best responses were assessable in 4 pts who received 2 cycles; 1 CRi in a pt with del17p- (based on lymph node [LN] response and no morphologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow), 2 unconfirmed CRs (based on LN response and no bone marrow at this time), and 1 PR in a pt with del17p- (this pt subsequently received an allogeneic stem cell transplant). Preliminary PK results for the Arm B 110 mg cohort indicated that navitoclax PK was similar in Cycle 1 (navitoclax+BR) and Cycle 2 (navitoclax alone), and appeared comparable to PK in the navitoclax monotherapy study. Conclusions: Early results show that the combination of navitoclax with BR is well-tolerated, without DLTs of TCP or neutropenia, and show evidence of anti-tumor activity. Data are limited in the FCR portion of the study. The maximum tolerated dose of navitoclax has not been reached. Accrual is ongoing and following completion of the dose-escalation components of this study, expanded cohorts of pts will be assessed using the recommended phase 2 dose of navitoclax to further assess the tolerability and dose, and to continue to explore for efficacy signals in combinations. Preliminary data in combination with BR are encouraging. Disclosures: Kipps: Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Wierda: Abbott: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jones: Glaxo Smith-Kline: Consultancy; Abbott: Research Funding. Swinnen: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yang: Abbott: Employment. Cui: Abbott: Employment. Busman: Abbott: Employment. Krivoshik: Abbott: Employment. Enschede: Abbott: Employment. Humerickhouse: Abbott: Employment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Puglisi, Martina, L. Rhoda Molife, Maja JA de Jonge, Khurum H. Khan, Leni van Doorn, Martin D. Forster, Montserrat Blanco, et al. "A Phase I study of the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of navitoclax plus docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors." Future Oncology 17, no. 21 (July 2021): 2747–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fon-2021-0140.

Full text

Abstract:

Aim: This Phase I study investigated safety of navitoclax and docetaxel in patients (n = 41) with advanced solid tumors. Patients & methods: Two navitoclax plus docetaxel dosing schedules (21 and 28 days) were evaluated. Maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities and preliminary antitumor activity were assessed. Results: Ten (24%) patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities; dose-escalation cohorts: n = 7 (21-day schedule: n = 5; 28-day schedule: n = 2) and 21-day expanded safety cohort: n = 3. Navitoclax 150-mg days 1–5 every 21 days with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 1 was the maximum tolerated dose and optimal schedule. Adverse events included thrombocytopenia (63%), fatigue (61%), nausea (59%) and neutropenia (51%). Four confirmed partial responses occurred. Conclusion: Navitoclax 150-mg orally once/day was safely administered with docetaxel. Myelosuppression limited dose escalation; antitumor activity was observed. Clinical trial registration: NCT00888108 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Chteinberg, Emil, Suzan Wetzels, Wouter Gerritsen, Lieve Temmerman, Joost van den Oord, Erik Biessen, Anna Kordelia Kurz, et al. "Navitoclax combined with Alpelisib effectively inhibits Merkel cell carcinoma cell growth in vitro." Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology 12 (January 2020): 175883592097562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835920975621.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly malignant skin cancer. Despite major treatment improvements during the last decade, up to 50% of patients do not respond to therapy or develop recurrent disease. For these patients, alternative treatment options are urgently needed. Here, we assessed the efficacy of the combination of the BCL-2 inhibitor Navitoclax and the PI3K p110α inhibitor Alpelisib in MCC cell lines. Methods: The expression of BCL-2 was assessed by immunohistochemistry in MCC and MCC cell lines. Treatment with Navitoclax and Alpelisib alone and in combination was performed on four MCC cell lines. The decrease of cell viability during treatment was assessed by XTT assay and visualized for the combinations by 3D combinatorial index plotting. The increase of apoptotic cells was determined by cleaved PARP Western blotting and Annexin V staining. Results: Some 94% of MCCs and all three MCPyV-positive cell lines showed BCL-2 expression. Navitoclax monotreatment was shown to be highly effective when treating BCL-2-positive cell lines (IC50-values ranging from 96.0 to 323.0 nM). The combination of Alpelisib and Navitoclax resulted in even stronger synergistic and prolonged inhibitions of MCC cell viability through apoptosis up to 4 days. Discussion: Our results show that the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 is frequently expressed in MCC and MCC cell lines. Inhibition of BCL-2 by Navitoclax in combination with Alpelisib revealed a strong synergy and prolonged inhibition of MCC cell viability and induction of apoptosis. The combination of Navitoclax and Alpelisib is a novel potential treatment option for MCC patients.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Roberts, Andrew W., John F. Seymour, Jennifer R. Brown, William G. Wierda, Thomas J. Kipps, Seong Lin Khaw, Dennis A. Carney, et al. "Substantial Susceptibility of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia to BCL2 Inhibition: Results of a Phase I Study of Navitoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Disease." Journal of Clinical Oncology 30, no. 5 (February 10, 2012): 488–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.34.7898.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose BCL2 overexpression is a hallmark of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The novel BH3 mimetic navitoclax (ABT-263) specifically inhibits BCL2 and related proteins BCL-xl and BCL-w, potently inducing apoptosis of CLL cells in vitro. A phase I trial in patients with CLL was conducted to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of oral navitoclax. Patients and Methods Twenty-nine patients with relapsed or refractory CLL received daily navitoclax for 14 days (10, 110, 200, or 250 mg/d; n = 15) or 21 days (125, 200, 250, or 300 mg/d; n = 14) of each 21-day cycle. Dose escalation decisions were informed by continual reassessment methodology. Results Lymphocytosis was reduced by more than 50% in 19 of 21 patients with baseline lymphocytosis. Among 26 patients treated with navitoclax ≥ 110 mg/d, nine (35%) achieved a partial response and seven maintained stable disease for more than 6 months. Median treatment duration was 7 months (range, 1 to ≥ 29 months). Median progression-free survival was 25 months. Activity was observed in patients with fludarabine-refractory disease, bulky adenopathy, and del(17p) CLL. Thrombocytopenia due to BCL-xl inhibition was the major dose-limiting toxicity and was dose-related. Low MCL1 expression and high BIM:MCL1 or BIM:BCL2 ratios in leukemic cells correlated with response. We determined that the navitoclax dose of 250 mg/d in a continuous dosing schedule was optimal for phase II studies. Conclusion BCL2 is a valid therapeutic target in CLL, and its inhibition by navitoclax warrants further evaluation as monotherapy and in combination in this disease.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Marczyk, Michal, Gauri A. Patwardhan, Jun Zhao, Rihao Qu, Xiaotong Li, Vikram B. Wali, Abhishek K. Gupta, et al. "Multi-Omics Investigation of Innate Navitoclax Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells." Cancers 12, no. 9 (September 8, 2020): 2551. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092551.

Full text

Abstract:

Cancer cells employ various defense mechanisms against drug-induced cell death. Investigating multi-omics landscapes of cancer cells before and after treatment can reveal resistance mechanisms and inform new therapeutic strategies. We assessed the effects of navitoclax, a BCL2 family inhibitor, on the transcriptome, methylome, chromatin structure, and copy number variations of MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. Cells were sampled before treatment, at 72 h of exposure, and after 10-day drug-free recovery from treatment. We observed transient alterations in the expression of stress response genes that were accompanied by corresponding changes in chromatin accessibility. Most of these changes returned to baseline after the recovery period. We also detected lasting alterations in methylation states and genome structure that suggest permanent changes in cell population composition. Using single-cell analyses, we identified 2350 genes significantly upregulated in navitoclax-resistant cells and derived an 18-gene navitoclax resistance signature. We assessed the navitoclax-response-predictive function of this signature in four additional TNBC cell lines in vitro and in silico in 619 cell lines treated with 251 different drugs. We observed a drug-specific predictive value in both experiments, suggesting that this signature could help guiding clinical biomarker studies involving navitoclax.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Kipps, Thomas J., Lode J. Swinnen, William G. Wierda, Jeffrey Alan Jones, Steven E. Coutre, Mitchell R. Smith, Jianning Yang, et al. "Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR): A Phase 1 Study in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL),." Blood 118, no. 21 (November 18, 2011): 3904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.v118.21.3904.3904.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Abstract 3904 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule, binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. In vitro, navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50≤1 μM) against T and B lymphoid malignancies that overexpress Bcl-2. In preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma, navitoclax enhanced efficacy of rituximab (R) when used alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Based on phase 1 trial data, oral navitoclax monotherapy was well-tolerated and had anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Thrombocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). We examined whether navitoclax could be used safely in combination with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) or bendamustine/rituximab (BR) for treatment of pts with CLL. Methods: This ongoing, phase 1 dose-escalation study is evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral navitoclax used in combination with FCR (Arm A) or BR (Arm B) for treatment of pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. Secondary objectives are efficacy endpoints (PFS, ORR, TTP, OS, duration of response). Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance score ≤1, ANC ≥1000/μL, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL. Preliminary results are reported. Enrolled pts (6 pts/cohort) were assigned to Arm A or Arm B based on physician preference. In both arms, R was 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycle 1; and 500 mg/m2 on Day 2 of Cycle 2 and on Day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. In Arm A, F 25 mg/m2 and C 175 mg/m2 were dosed on Days 2–4 in Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1–3 in subsequent cycles. In Arm B, B was dosed at 70 mg/m2 on Days 2 and 3 of Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1 and 2 in subsequent cycles. Oral navitoclax was administered once daily (starting dose of 110 mg) pre-chemotherapy on Days 3–5 of Cycle 1 and Days 1–3 of subsequent cycles. Dose escalation decisions were made independently in each arm via a continuous reassessment method, and the objective was to identify a dose of navitoclax in combination with chemotherapy in which <33% of subjects experienced DLTs. Tumor responses were evaluated using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Adverse events (AE) were graded by NCI CTCAE V3. Pts continued on navitoclax monotherapy up to the recommended phase 2 dose of 250 mg daily for 1 year or until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. Results: As of July 2011, 28 pts (median age 59 yr [39–80]) have enrolled; 5 in Arm A (FCR+navitoclax; 110 mg) and 23 in Arm B (BR+navitoclax; 110–250 mg). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–13). In Arm A, 1 pt had a DLT of febrile neutropenia (110 mg). In Arm B, 5 pts had DLT; 1 had elevated ALT and AST (110 mg), 1 had grade 4 febrile neutropenia (200 mg), and 3 had grade 4 thrombocytopenia (250 mg). Overall, the most common (>20%) navitoclax-related AEs of any grade were nausea (73%), fatigue (50%), neutropenia (50%), cough (39%), vomiting (35%), chills (31%), diarrhea (31%), constipation (27%), headache (27%), anemia (23%), and thrombocytopenia (23%). The most common (>19%) grade 3/4 navitoclax-related AE was neutropenia (35%) and thrombocytopenia (19%); but only 2 of the latter pts had hemorrhagic events (Grade 1 epistaxis) unlikely related to navitoclax. Of the 28 pts evaluated for safety, 6 remain active and 22 discontinued (DC); 1 due to AE, 1 due to AE and progressive disease (PD), 3 due to PD, 6 withdrew consent, 3 due to physician discretion, 4 completed therapy, 2 proceeded to transplant, and 2 due to toxicity. Preliminary best anti-tumor responses were assessed in 20 pts. Of the 16 pts assessed in Arm B (BR), 6 achieved complete responses (CR), 7 partial responses (PR), 2 stable disease (SD) and 1 with PD. The ORR was 81% (13/16). In this arm, 3/5 pts with 17p deletion achieved PR. Of the 4 pts assessed in Arm A (FCR), 2 achieved PR, 1 SD and 1 with PD. Preliminary PK results suggest that there is no apparent PK interaction between navitoclax and bendamustine. Conclusions: The combination of navitoclax with BR appears well-tolerated and to have anti-tumor activity. The maximum tolerated dose of navitoclax has been reached at 250 mg for Arm B, but not for Arm A where escalation continues. To date, we have not observed unacceptable myelotoxicity when this bcl-2 antagonist was used in combination with standard cytotoxic chemo-immunotherapy regimens for treatment of pts with CLL. Disclosures: Kipps: Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbott Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Off Label Use: R05429083 is a novel humanized antibody direct against the standard region of CD44. R05429083 is currently intensive pre-clinical studies and fist dosing of cancer patients has started in Europe in 2011. Swinnen:Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding. Yang:Abbott Laboratories: Employment. Cui:Abbott Laboratories: Employment, Stock Holder at Abbott Laboratories. Busman:Abbott Laboratories: Employment, Owns Abbott Laboratories Stock. Enschede:Abbott Laboratories: Employment, Owns Abbott Laboratories Stock. Humerickhouse:Abbott Laboratories: Employment, Owns Abbott Laboratories Stock.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Kahl, Brad, Andrew W. Roberts, John F. Seymour, Ranjana H. Advani, Daniel Oscar Persky, Jianning Yang, Yue Cui, et al. "Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Rituximab: Interim Results of a Phase 1 Study In Patients with CD20-Positive Lymphoid Malignancies." Blood 116, no. 21 (November 19, 2010): 3943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.v116.21.3943.3943.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Abstract 3943 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263) is a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule that binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. Navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50 ≤1μM) in vitro against T and B lymphoid malignancies that over-express Bcl-2. As monotherapy in phase 1 trials, oral navitoclax is well-tolerated and with daily dosing has shown activity in patients (pts) with lymphoid malignancies and many pts (response rate approximately 35%) with chronic relapsed or refractory lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Thrombocytopenia is the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Rituximab mono- or combination therapy is an established treatment for pts with indolent, CD20-positive B-cell malignancies. In multiple preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma, the efficacy of rituximab (monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy) was enhanced by the addition of navitoclax. Methods: This international, phase 1, dose-escalation study employing a modified Fibonacci 3+3 design, assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK), and determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RPTD) of oral navitoclax added to standard rituximab monotherapy in pts with CD20-positive malignancies. Secondary objectives were evaluation of progression-free survival, response rate, duration of response, and overall survival. Patient eligibility included ≥1 lesion ≥1.5 cm, ECOG score ≤1, and platelet count of ≥100,000/mm3. For all dose cohorts, after a 7–14 day 150 mg/day dose lead-in, navitoclax was given once daily at 200 mg (Cohort 1), 250 mg (Cohort 2), or 325 mg (Cohort 3). At least 3 pts were enrolled in each cohort. At MTD determination, a safety expansion cohort of up to 12 pts was added. Pts proceeded from lead-in to the combination regimen, if the pre-dose platelet count on Lead-in Day 7 was ≥50,000/mm3. Rituximab was given 375 mg/m2 IV once weekly for 4 doses, starting Day 1 of Week 1. A cycle was 28 days of therapy. Patients were allowed to continue on navitoclax therapy for 2 years in the absence of progressive disease or significant toxicity. Safety was assessed by NCI-CTCAE v3.0, and tumor responses by IWG or NCI-WG criteria (for CLL pts) every 2 months by CT or MRI. Results: As of July 2010, 19 pts, median age 58 years (range 45–92), have been enrolled (11 with follicular lymphoma [FL], 3 with CLL/SLL, and 1 each with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, transformed disease, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma [LPL], lymphoblastic lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma, respectively); 4 in the 200 mg, 7 in the 250 mg, 3 in the 325 mg, and 5 in the 250 mg expanded safety cohort. The median number of prior therapies was 3. Seventeen pts had navitoclax-related AEs, the most common being diarrhea (11 pts), nausea (11), and fatigue (8). DLTs were Grade 3 diarrhea (1 pt in the 250 mg cohort), Grade 3 fatigue (1 pt in the 325 mg cohort), and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1 pt in the 325 mg cohort). MTD was defined as 250 mg. Preliminary antitumor activity and best response data are available for 12 pts. Eight pts responded (ORR 67%) with 4 CRs (all FL), 4 PRs (SLL, FL, CLL, LPL), 1 SD, and 3 PDs. Five other pts are continuing treatment but have not yet reached the first tumor assessment at 12 weeks. One pt discontinued due to disease progression prior to the first tumor assessment, and 1 pt discontinued after 3 days of dosing due to the taste of the oral drug solution. Twelve pts remain on study at a median of 19.4 weeks (4.4–49.1 weeks). Preliminary PK results indicated that navitoclax PK at doses of 200–325 mg in this combination study was comparable to that in the navitoclax monotherapy study. Conclusions: The combination of navitoclax and rituximab is well tolerated and shows encouraging preliminary evidence of activity. The MTD of navitoclax in combination with rituximab is 250 mg. An expanded cohort of pts is being enrolled at 250 mg of navitoclax to further assess tolerability, confirm this dose as the RPTD, and to better define efficacy. Disclosures: Kahl: Abbott: Consultancy, Research Funding. Roberts:Abbott: Research Funding. Seymour:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Advani:Abbott: Research Funding. Persky:Millennium, Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Yang:Abbott: Employment. Cui:Abbott: Employment. Busman:Abbott: Employment. Krivoshik:Abbott: Employment. Enschede:Abbott: Employment. Humerickhouse:Abbott: Employment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Phillips, D. C., Y. Xiao, L. T. Lam, E. Litvinovich, L. Roberts-Rapp, A. J. Souers, and J. D. Leverson. "Loss in MCL-1 function sensitizes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cell lines to the BCL-2-selective inhibitor venetoclax (ABT-199)." Blood Cancer Journal 5, no. 11 (November 2015): e368-e368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.88.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract As a population, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) cell lines positive for the t(14;18) translocation and/or possessing elevated BCL2 copy number (CN; BCL2 High ) are exquisitely sensitive to navitoclax or the B-cell lymphoma protein-2 (BCL-2)-selective inhibitor venetoclax. Despite this, some BCL2 High cell lines remain resistant to either agent. Here we show that the MCL-1-specific inhibitor A-1210477 sensitizes these cell lines to navitoclax. Chemical segregation of this synergy with the BCL-2-selective inhibitor venetoclax or BCL-XL-selective inhibitor A-1155463 indicated that MCL-1 and BCL-2 are the two key anti-apoptotic targets for sensitization. Similarly, the CDK inhibitor flavopiridol downregulated MCL-1 expression and synergized with venetoclax in BCL2 High NHL cell lines to a similar extent as A-1210477. A-1210477 also synergized with navitoclax in the majority of BCL2 Low NHL cell lines. However, chemical segregation with venetoclax or A-1155463 revealed that synergy was driven by BCL-XL inhibition in this population. Collectively these data emphasize that BCL2 status is predictive of venetoclax potency in NHL not only as a single agent, but also in the adjuvant setting with anti-tumorigenic agents that inhibit MCL-1 function. These studies also potentially identify a patient population (BCL2 Low ) that could benefit from BCL-XL (navitoclax)-driven combination therapy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Eradat, Herbert, Sebastian Grosicki, John Catalono, Walter Cosolo, Irina Dyagil, Thomas J. Kipps, Beiyao Zheng, et al. "Preliminary Results of a Phase II Open-Label, Randomized Study of the BH3 Mimetic Protein Navitoclax (ABT-263) with or without Rituximab for Treatment of Previously Untreated B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia." Blood 120, no. 21 (November 16, 2012): 190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.v120.21.190.190.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Abstract 190 Introduction: Overexpression of Bcl-2 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is associated with enhanced CLL-cell resistance to spontaneous or chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. The BH3 mimetic protein navitoclax (ABT-263) specifically inhibits Bcl-2, and related proteins Bcl-xL and Bcl-w, and can induce apoptosis of CLL cells in vitro. Phase I evaluation in relapsed/refractory CLL patients demonstrated 35% overall response rate (Roberts, 2012). Dose-limiting thrombocytopenia due to Bcl-xL inhibition was mitigated using a lead-in dosing schedule to allow the bone marrow to achieve a compensatory increase in platelets prior to dose escalation to the MTD of 250 mg. Based on the promising single-agent data, a Phase II trial randomized trial compared the safety, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of treatment with navitoclax and rituximab (RTX) versus RTX alone. Methods: Patients with CLL who required initial treatment according to iwCLL criteria (Hallek et al, 2008) were stratified by Binet stage and high-risk cytogenetic features (17p deletion and/or 11q deletion), and randomized 1:1:1 to receive RTX weekly for 8 wks (375 mg/m2 wk 1, 500 mg/m2 wks 2–8) (Arm A), or RTX for 8 wks plus navitoclax daily for 12 wks (250 mg/day following a 7–14 day lead-in period of 100 mg/day) (Arm B), or RTX for 8 wks plus navitoclax daily as in Arm B, but continued treatment with navitoclax until disease progression, relapse, or unacceptable toxicity (Arm C). Arm A to Arm B crossover was permitted. Response rate was assessed by iwCLL CLL response criteria at week 12, and every 12 weeks during follow-up. The study was stopped after the last patient had completed ≥ 12 weeks of treatment and week-12 response assessment. Results: Baseline characteristics and prognostic factors for the 118 randomized patients were generally balanced among the three treatment arms. Median age was 63 years (range 38–94), and 55% were Binet stage B+C. Median baseline lymphocyte count was 53,000 mm3 (range 7,000–552,000/mm3). FISH analyses identified higher than expected rates of deletion of 11q or 17p in the CLL cells of 32% or 28% of patients, respectively. Median time on study was 32 weeks overall (24 wks for Arm A, 33 wks Arm B, and 44 wks Arm C). AEs of Grade 3–4 that were more common (> 5% greater) in a navitoclax-treated arm compared with the RTX arm included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, GI symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain), chills, fatigue, ALT/AST/bilirubin elevations, and infusion-related reactions (to RTX). Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and hepatic enzyme elevations were generally reversible when navitoclax was stopped and/or dose-reduced; however, 12 patients (15%) discontinued navitoclax due to laboratory abnormalities (9 due to ALT elevations). Neutropenia responded to growth factors. One serious event of epistaxis occurred related to the thrombocytopenia. Two deaths occurred on study, one on the RTX-only arm due to a pulmonary embolus and one on Arm B due to hypotension and dyspnea related to a severe RTX infusion reaction. Investigator-assessed objective response (CR and PR) rate was 35% for Arm A, 55% for Arm B (p=0.19 vs A), and 70% for Arm C (p=0.0034 vs A). All responses were PRs except for 2 CRs in Arm C. All responses were confirmed by CT (and BM for CR) ≥ 8 wks after clinical response assessment. While the presence of 17p deletion appeared to result in a lower response rate to RTX alone (Arm A, ORR 18%, 2/11 pts), it did not appear to affect the response to ABT-263 and RTX (Arm B, ORR 73%, 8/11 pts); Arm C, ORR 50%, 5/10 pts. Limited PFS results appeared consistent with the responses by arm, with a longer PFS associated with the longer duration of ABT-263 treatment on Arm C; however, the magnitude of PFS differences could not be precisely quantified due to the limited follow-up and patient number. Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis did not detect any drug interaction between navitoclax and RTX. Conclusions: Navitoclax in combination with RTX weekly × 8 was generally well-tolerated as initial therapy for CLL patients and demonstrated greater clinical activity than treatment with RTX alone as well as responses in patients with 17p deletion. The preliminary results of this study indicate that a BH3-mimetic inhibitor of Bcl-2 could be highly effective when used in combination with RTX for treatment of patients with CLL. Disclosures: Eradat: Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: BH3 Mimetic Protein Navitoclax (ABT-263). Catalono:Genentech: Consultancy. Kipps:Genentech: Research Funding. Zheng:Genentech: Employment. Yalamanchili:Genentech: Employment. Sahasranaman:Genentech: Employment. Hurst:Genentech: Employment. Ho:Genentech: Employment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Kontro, Mika, Samuli Eldfors, Muntasir Mamun Majumder, Alun Parsons, Tea Pemovska, Olli Kallioniemi, Krister Wennerberg, Caroline A. Heckman, and Kimmo Porkka. "BCL2-Inhibitors Target a Major Group of Newly-Diagnosed and Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Ex Vivo." Blood 126, no. 23 (December 3, 2015): 2462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.v126.23.2462.2462.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract BACKGROUND: BCL-2 family members play a critical role in the regulation of apoptosis. BCL-2 and BCL-XL promote cell survival by preventing mitochondrial apoptotic pore formation. BH3 mimetic drugs such as venetoclax (ABT-199) promote apoptosis by inhibiting BCL-2 while navitoclax (ABT-263) inhibits both BCL-2 and BCL-XL. In AML, the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins is highly variable. In a recent study venetoclax showed single-agent activity in 6/12 AML cell lines and 20/25 patient samples. (Pan et al. Cancer Disc 2014). The samples with complex cytogenetics were largely resistant. Sensitivity correlated with increased BCL-2 protein levels and negatively correlated with BCL-XL and MCL-1 protein levels. We aimed to expand these data to both newly diagnosed and relapsed AML patients and to isolate biomarkers for patient selection. METHODS: We assessed the ex vivo sensitivity of fresh leukemic cells from 16 diagnosed and 36relapsed/refractory AML patient samples to venetoclax (25 samples) and navitoclax (52 samples). Exome sequencing was performed on 32 samples and gene expression of BCL2 family members (BCL-2, BCL-XL, MCL-1, BIK, BAX, BAK1, BID, BCL2L12, BIM, BCL2A1, PUMA and BAD) was determined on 31 samples by qRT-PCR. Samples from primary cells of healthy individuals (n=10), and CMML (n=7) or CLL (n=2) patients were used as controls. Drug sensitivity was determined over a 10,000-fold concentration range (1-10 000 nM). A leukemia-specific drug sensitivity score (sDSS) derived from area under the dose response curve calculations was used as the efficacy variable by comparing leukemia results with those from normal bone marrow cells (Bhagwan et al., Sci Rep 2014, Pemovska et al., Cancer Disc 2014). RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, CMML samples were largely non-sensitive, whereas CLL samples were highly sensitive to BCL-2 inhibitors ex vivo. The AML samples exhibited heterogeneous responses. 15/25 (60%) of AML samples were sensitive to venetoclax and 35/52 (67%) to navitoclax. Both diagnostic (12 of 16 samples, 75%) and relapsed/refractory samples (24 of 36 samples, 64%) were sensitive to navitoclax. Similarly, 6/7 (86%) of diagnostic samples and 9/18 (50%) of relapsed/refractory samples were sensitive to venetoclax. We observed responses to venetoclax and navitoclax in each patient to be similar, although navitoclax showed efficacy at lower concentrations: in 25 samples tested with both agents, mean sDSS values were lower in navitoclax-treated samples (paired t-test, p=0.02). All except one patient sample exhibited a difference in resistance between the two drugs showing sensitivity to navitoclax but not to venetoclax. We observed responses across all mutational profiles, including samples with mutations to FLT3 -ITD, NPM1, TP53, NRAS and IDH1 and IDH2, as well as in samples with complex karyotypes. Intriguingly, three of four samples with mutated TP53 exhibited sensitivity to BCL2 inhibition. No single mutation predicted sensitivity or resistance. At the RNA level, no statistical correlation between BCL2 or BCL-XL expression for BCL2 inhibitor response was observed. Instead we observed high levels of beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) mRNA expression in BCL2 inhibitor-resistant samples with a strong negative correlation to navitoclax sensitivity (r=-0.60, P=0.0008). DISCUSSION: We did not observe BCL2 and BCL-XL mRNA expression to be optimal predictors for BCL2 inhibitor response. On the other hand, we observed high expression of B2M mRNA expression in resistant samples suggesting that it could serve as a biomarker for sensitivity to BCL2 inhibitors. The high B2M expression has been previously linked to poor prognosis in solid tumors and in AML (Albitar et al., Leukemia 2007). In cell line models B2M leads to phosphorylation and inactivation of proapototic protein BAD (Nokura et al., J Urol 2007). This may affect the balance between pro- and antiapoptotic proteins and thus offer a escape route from BCL2 inhibition. To conclude, we observed BCL2 inhibition to be effective ex vivo in over half of all AML samples, tested both in primary and relapsed/refractory state as well as across different subgroups defined by AML driver mutations. Of the potential biomarkers that were assessed, B2M was the best mRNA-level indicator for anti-BCL-2 drug efficacy. Disclosures Off Label Use: BCL2 inhibitors are not approved for the treatment of AML. Heckman:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Porkka:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Ju, Wei, Meili Zhang, Kelli M. Wilson, Michael N. Petrus, Richard N. Bamford, Xiaohu Zhang, Rajarshi Guha, Marc Ferrer, Craig J. Thomas, and Thomas A. Waldmann. "Augmented efficacy of brentuximab vedotin combined with ruxolitinib and/or Navitoclax in a murine model of human Hodgkin’s lymphoma." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 6 (January 25, 2016): 1624–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524668113.

Full text

Abstract:

Despite relative success of therapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), novel therapeutic agents are needed for patients with refractory or relapsed disease. Recently, anti-PD1 immunotherapy or treatment with the anti-CD30 toxin conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) have been associated with remissions; however, the median responses of complete responses (CRs) with the latter were only 6.7 mo. To obtain curative therapy, other effective agents, based on HL biology, would have to be given in combination with BV. Hodgkin’s Reed–Sternberg (HRS) cells secrete cytokines including IL-6 and -13, leading to constitutive activation of JAK/STAT signaling. In the present study the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib reduced phosphorylation of STAT3 and STAT6 and expression of c-Myc in the HL cell line HDLM-2. These changes were enhanced when, on the basis of a matrix screen of drug combinations, ruxolitinib was combined with the Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitor Navitoclax. The combination augmented expression of Bik, Puma, and Bax, and attenuated Bcl-xL expression and the phosphorylation of Bad. The use of the two-agent combination of either ruxolitinib or Navitoclax with BV or the three-agent combination strongly activated Bax and increased activities of cytochrome c and caspase-9 and -3 that, in turn, led to cleavage of poly(ADP ribose) polymerase and Mcl-1. Either ruxolitinib combined with Navitoclax or BV alone prolonged survival but did not cure HDLM-2 tumor-bearing mice, whereas BV combined with ruxolitinib and/or with Navitoclax resulted in a sustained, complete elimination of the HDLM-2 HL. These studies provide scientific support for a clinical trial to evaluate BV combined with ruxolitinib in select patients with HL.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Ding, Jie, Xu Zhang, Chuangqi Chen, Yuqiang Huang, Xingsu Yu, and Xiaomao Li. "Ultra pH-sensitive polymeric nanovesicles co-deliver doxorubicin and navitoclax for synergetic therapy of endometrial carcinoma." Biomaterials Science 8, no. 8 (2020): 2264–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00112k.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Dilley, Kimberley, Jason Harb, Muhammad Jalaluddin, Jessica E. Hutti, and Jalaja Potluri. "A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Navitoclax Plus Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myelofibrosis (TRANSFORM-2)." Blood 136, Supplement 1 (November 5, 2020): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-139247.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers a potential cure, most patients remain ineligible; other therapies, including approved JAK inhibitors (JAKi), do not control the broad array of manifestations associated with MF. Navitoclax is a potent, small molecule inhibitor of the antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) family members BCL-XL, BCL-2, and BCL-w and has been shown to potently enhance cytotoxicity of chemotherapy and radiation in cells derived from multiple tumor types. Preclinical data indicate that navitoclax may overcome JAK2 inhibitor resistance. Preliminary data from a Phase 2 study (NCT03222609) of navitoclax with ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2i, for patients with primary or secondary MF who have previously received ruxolitinib suggest favorable spleen response rates and an acceptable safety profile (Harrison et al. EHA 2020. EP1081). TRANSFORM-2 aims to evaluate the combination of navitoclax and ruxolitinib vs best available therapy (BAT) in adults with relapsed or refractory MF that is resistant to JAK2 inhibition. Study Design and Methods: This Phase 3, open-label study (NCT04468984) is designed to recruit patients aged ≥18 years with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF, measurable splenomegaly, and who are experiencing MF-related symptoms. Patients must have received a single prior JAK2i for ≥24 weeks that was stopped due to lack of efficacy or for <24 weeks with disease progression while on therapy. Candidates for allo-HSCT, patients who have received prior treatment with a BH3-mimetic compound or >1 prior JAK2i, and patients with platelets <100 × 109/L will be excluded. The study will be conducted at approximately 173 sites in 23 countries. The planned sample size is 330 patients. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either navitoclax plus ruxolitinib, or BAT. Navitoclax will be administered orally at a starting dose of 200 mg (platelet count >150 × 109/L) or 100 mg escalated to 200 mg once daily if tolerated after ≥7 days (platelet count ≤150 × 109/L); navitoclax may be increased to 300 mg once daily after Week 25 Day 1 at the investigator's discretion, based on platelet count for patients with suboptimal spleen response; ruxolitinib will be administered orally at the prior stable dose if on ruxolitinib at study entry or at a dose of 10 mg twice daily if no longer on ruxolitinib. BAT options include hydroxyurea, interferon, ruxolitinib, fedratinib, or danazol, which will be administered at standard doses. Randomization stratification will be by region (US vs Japan vs EU vs rest of world), by Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System Plus score at randomization (intermediate-2 vs high risk), and by stable ruxolitinib dosing at randomization vs not on ruxolitinib/JAK2i. Treatment can continue until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation criteria have been met; disease assessments will be performed after 12 and 24 weeks even if discontinuing therapy, after which patients will enter posttreatment follow-up (discontinuation without progression) or survival follow-up (after progression). The primary endpoint is ≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline (SVR35) at Week 24, measured by magnetic resonance imaging, per International Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include ≥50% reduction in total symptom score from baseline at Week 24, SVR35, duration of SVR35, change in fatigue from baseline, time to deterioration of physical functioning, anemia response, overall survival, leukemia-free survival, overall response, composite response, and reduction in grade of bone marrow fibrosis from baseline. Safety will be assessed via adverse event (AE) monitoring, physical examinations, vital sign measurements, electrocardiogram variables, and clinical laboratory testing. AEs will be graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs v5.0. Statistical analysis of the primary endpoint and binary secondary endpoints will be conducted using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Time-to-event secondary endpoints will be analyzed using a stratified log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios will be estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Disclosures Dilley: AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Harb:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Jalaluddin:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Hutti:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Potluri:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. OffLabel Disclosure: Navitoclax is an investigational drug for the treatment of myelofibrosis

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Abraham, Pranav, Xiaomeng Liao, Manoj Chevli, and Sarah Smith. "Indirect Treatment Comparisons of the Effect of Fedratinib Versus Navitoclax Plus Ruxolitinib on Spleen Volume and Symptoms in Patients with Myelofibrosis and Prior Ruxolitinib Treatment." Blood 138, Supplement 1 (November 5, 2021): 4626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-145862.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a serious and life-threatening myeloproliferative neoplasm that is characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation, bone marrow fibrosis, anemia and splenomegaly. The Janus kinase (JAK) pathway is the critical pathway in its pathogenesis. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, was the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for intermediate- and high-risk MF. However, there remains a high unmet need for alternative treatment options for patients who discontinue (41.1%-60.9% of patients discontinue after 3 months and 48.4%-73.0% after 6 months) (Fonseca E, et al. Blood 2013;122. Abstract 2833) or are no longer responding to ruxolitinib therapy (Bose P, Verstovsek S. Leuk Lymphoma 2020;61:1797-1809). The efficacy and safety of fedratinib, a JAK2 inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2019, was investigated post ruxolitinib in the single-arm trial JAKARTA-2 (NCT01523171) (Harrison CN, et al. Lancet Haematol 2017;4:e317-324; Harrison CN, et al. Am J Hematol 2020;95:594-603). New clinical evidence for treating a similar population with navitoclax plus ruxolitinib was presented at the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting in 2020 (Pemmaraju N, et al. Blood 2020;136(suppl 1):49-50). The efficacy of fedratinib relative to navitoclax plus ruxolitinib in patients with MF previously treated with ruxolitinib has not yet been evaluated. Objective: To explore the comparative efficacy of fedratinib versus navitoclax plus ruxolitinib in patients with MF previously treated with ruxolitinib for the 2 binary endpoints of ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR) from baseline to the end of cycle 6 (EOC6; 24 weeks) and ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) from baseline to the EOC6. Methods: Evidence for fedratinib was informed by JAKARTA-2 patient-level data, and evidence for navitoclax plus ruxolitinib was informed by known reported evidence from the REFINE study (NCT03222609) (Pemmaraju N, et al. Blood 2020;136(suppl 1):49-50; Harrison CN, et al. J Clin Oncol 2019;37 (suppl 15). Abstract 7057). The suitability of these studies for indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was assessed by considering the comparability of study design, population, intervention, and outcomes. Given the lack of a common comparator in the identified studies, unanchored ITCs were performed for SVR using matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) and simulated treatment comparison (STC) methods. Univariable and multivariable regression models were used to identify potential prognostic factors to adjust for in the ITCs. Additionally, all reported Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)-Plus criteria were considered. Where sample size was too small, response rates (number of responders divided by total number of patients) were compared naively. Results: A subgroup of 58 JAKARTA-2 patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 0 or 1 and intermediate-2 or high-risk disease most closely aligned with the REFINE population was used in the analyses. Baseline mean platelet count was similar between subgroups. Across the analyses performed, results suggested fedratinib consistently increased the odds/risk of a spleen response compared with navitoclax plus ruxolitinib (Table). The MAIC, matching on ECOG PS, suggested that the odds of having an SVR for patients in the fedratinib group was 2.19 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 3.66) that of the navitoclax plus ruxolitinib group, and the risk of having an SVR for patients in the fedratinib group was 17.59% higher (95% CI, −2.14 to 36.97). The results from the MAIC that additionally matched on all possible DIPSS-Plus criteria (age, hemoglobin, and platelet count) were consistent. Results from the 2 methods (MAIC and STC) were also consistent. For TSS reduction, the sample size (N = 20) in REFINE was considered too small to perform a meaningful ITC; however, the absolute response rates for TSS reduction were similar across the 2 groups (29% [16/56] in the fedratinib group and 30% [6/20] in the navitoclax plus ruxolitinib group). Conclusion: In the population of patients with MF previously treated with ruxolitinib, these analyses suggest treatment with fedratinib was associated with a greater proportion of patients achieving a spleen response compared with navitoclax plus ruxolitinib. Limited data were available for comparison of TSS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Abraham: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Liao: BMS: Consultancy. Chevli: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Smith: Sarah Smith is an employee of BresMed. BresMed received consultancy fees from BMS/Celgene for the reasearch in this abstract. She did not receive direct payment as a result of this work outside of her normal salary payments.: Consultancy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Yamamoto, Masahiro, Shuhei Suzuki, Keita Togashi, Asuka Sugai, Masashi Okada, and Chifumi Kitanaka. "Gemcitabine Cooperates with Everolimus to Inhibit the Growth of and Sensitize Malignant Meningioma Cells to Apoptosis Induced by Navitoclax, an Inhibitor of Anti-Apoptotic BCL-2 Family Proteins." Cancers 14, no. 7 (March 27, 2022): 1706. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071706.

Full text

Abstract:

Despite several clinical trials with encouraging findings, effective standard systemic therapies have yet to be established for malignant meningioma and the prognosis of these patients remains poor. Accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that gemcitabine is effective against malignant meningioma. To identify drugs with therapeutic effects that may be enhanced in combination with gemcitabine, we screened drugs that have been tested in preclinical and clinical trials for meningioma. In IOMM-Lee and HKBMM malignant meningioma cells, gemcitabine enhanced the growth inhibitory effects of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, the clinical benefits of which have been demonstrated in patients with meningioma. The synergistic growth inhibitory effects of this combination were accompanied by cellular senescence characterized by an increase in senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity. To enhance the effects of this combination, we screened senolytic drugs that selectively kill senescent cells, and found that navitoclax, an inhibitor of anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family proteins, effectively reduced the number of viable malignant meningioma cells in combination with everolimus and gemcitabine by inducing apoptotic cell death. The suppression of tumor growth in vivo by the combination of everolimus with gemcitabine was significantly stronger than that by either treatment alone. Moreover, navitoclax, in combination with everolimus and gemcitabine, significantly reduced tumor sizes with an increase in the number of cleaved caspase-3-positive apoptotic cells. The present results suggest that the addition of gemcitabine with or without navitoclax to everolimus is a promising strategy that warrants further evaluation in future clinical trials for malignant meningioma.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Taban, Kübra, David Pauck, Mara Maue, Viktoria Marquardt, Hua Yu, Olivier Ayrault, Daniel Picard, et al. "MBRS-48. IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES FOR MYC-DRIVEN MEDULLOBLASTOMA." Neuro-Oncology 22, Supplement_3 (December 1, 2020): iii406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.557.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant brain tumor in children and is frequently metastatic at diagnosis. Treatment with surgery, radiation and multi-agent chemotherapy may leave survivors of these brain tumors with long-term deficits as a consequence. One of the four consensus molecular subgroups of MB is the MYC-driven group 3 MB, which is the most malignant type and has a poor prognosis under current therapy. Thus, it is important to discover more effective targeted therapeutic approaches. We conducted a high-throughput drug screening to identify novel compounds showing efficiency in group 3 MB using both clinically established inhibitors (n=196) and clinically-applicable compounds (n=464). More than 20 compounds demonstrated a significantly higher anti-tumoral effect in MYChigh (n=7) compared to MYClow (n=4) MB cell models. Among these compounds, Navitoclax and Clofarabine showed the strongest effect in inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MYChigh MB models. Furthermore, we show that Navitoclax, an orally bioavailable and blood-brain barrier passing anti-cancer drug, inhibits specifically Bcl-xL proteins. In line, we found a significant correlation between BCL-xL and MYC mRNA levels in 763 primary MB patient samples (Data source: “R2 https://hgserver1.amc.nl”). In addition, Navitoclax and Clofarabine have been tested in cells obtained from MB patient-derived-xenografts, which confirmed their specific efficacy in MYChigh versus MYClow MB. In summary, our approach has identified promising new drugs that significantly reduce cell viability in MYChigh compared to MYClow MB cell models. Our findings point to novel therapeutic vulnerabilities for MB that need to be further validated in vitro and in vivo.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Gandhi, Leena, D. Ross Camidge, Moacyr Ribeiro de Oliveira, Philip Bonomi, David Gandara, Divis Khaira, Christine L. Hann, et al. "Phase I Study of Navitoclax (ABT-263), a Novel Bcl-2 Family Inhibitor, in Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors." Journal of Clinical Oncology 29, no. 7 (March 1, 2011): 909–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.31.6208.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose Resistance to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis represents a major obstacle to cancer control. Overexpression of Bcl-2 is seen in multiple tumor types and targeting Bcl-2 may provide therapeutic benefit. A phase I study of navitoclax, a novel inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins, was conducted to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy in patients with solid tumors. Patients and Methods Patients enrolled to intermittent dosing cohorts received navitoclax on day −3, followed by dosing on days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. Patients on continuous dosing received a 1-week lead-in dose of 150 mg followed by continuous daily administration. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses, biomarker analyses, and platelet monitoring. Results Forty-seven patients, including 29 with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or pulmonary carcinoid, were enrolled between 2007 and 2008, 35 on intermittent and 12 on continuous dosing cohorts. Primary toxicities included diarrhea (40%), nausea (34%), vomiting (36%), and fatigue (34%); most were grade 1 or 2. Dose- and schedule-dependent thrombocytopenia was seen in all patients. One patient with SCLC had a confirmed partial response lasting longer than 2 years, and eight patients with SCLC or carcinoid had stable disease (one remained on study for 13 months). Pro-gastrin releasing peptide (pro-GRP) was identified as a surrogate marker of Bcl-2 amplification and changes correlated with changes in tumor volume. Conclusion Navitoclax is safe and well tolerated, with dose-dependent thrombocytopenia as the major adverse effect. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging in SCLC. Efficacy in SCLC and the utility of pro-GRP as a marker of treatment response will be further evaluated in phase II studies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Zeuner, Simon, Johanna Vollmer, Heike Peterziel, Romain Sigaud, Sina Oppermann, Dina ElHarouni, Thomas Hielscher, et al. "EMBR-11. SYNERGISTIC DRUG COMBINATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF MYC AMPLIFIED GROUP 3 MEDULLOBLASTOMA." Neuro-Oncology 23, Supplement_1 (June 1, 2021): i7—i8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab090.029.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Background Medulloblastoma (MB) is a highly aggressive brain tumour in children. Patients with Group 3 MB harbouring a MYC-amplification (subtype II) show a particularly poor outcome despite high-intensity multimodal therapy. We and others have previously shown that MYC amplified Group 3 MB cells are highly susceptible towards treatment with class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors such as entinostat. However, in clinical trials HDACi as a monotherapy show only modest efficacy in solid tumours. We propose to increase the efficacy of class I HDACi by drug combinations. Methods To identify synergistic drug combinations (entinostat + X) for the treatment of MYC amplified MB we performed a drug screen with a library of n=75 clinically available compounds as single agents and in combination with entinostat in n=3 MYC amplified vs. n=1 MYC-non amplified cell lines. Synergistic behaviour of the six most promising drug combinations was validated by metabolic activity assays, cell count experiments and gene expression profiling. Synergy was assessed by the Loewe additivity model using a combination of ray design and checkerboard matrix. Results The drug screen revealed n=20/75 drugs that were particularly effective (drug sensitivity score ≥10) in combination with entinostat treatment in all three MYC amplified cell lines. Synergy assessment of the top n=6 drugs confirmed strong synergistic activity with entinostat for n=2 drugs (navitoclax, irinotecan). The BCL-2 family inhibitor navitoclax showed the most robust synergy with entinostat in subsequent validation experiments. Conclusion Several drugs either clinically available or currently in clinical trials, including the BCL-2/Xl/w inhibitor navitoclax, show promising effects in a combination therapy with entinostat for the treatment of MYC amplified Group 3 MB.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Harrison, Claire N., Jacqueline S. Garcia, Ruben A. Mesa, Tim CP Somervaille, Rami S. Komrokji, Naveen Pemmaraju, Catriona Jamieson, et al. "Results from a Phase 2 Study of Navitoclax in Combination with Ruxolitinib in Patients with Primary or Secondary Myelofibrosis." Blood 134, Supplement_1 (November 13, 2019): 671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2019-130158.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is associated with bone marrow fibrosis (BMF), splenomegaly, a high symptom burden, and poor prognosis; the JAK/STAT pathway is the central pathway implicated in its pathogenesis. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor and the only FDA-approved pharmacotherapy for treatment (Tx) of MF patients (pts), improves splenomegaly, but is unable to control all clinical manifestations of disease. Navitoclax is an orally bioavailable, novel small-molecule that targets and binds with high affinity to multiple antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) family proteins, including BCL-XL, BCL2, and BCL-W. Preclinical studies have demonstrated cytotoxic activity of navitoclax against myeloproliferative neoplasm-derived cell lines. Herein, the results of a phase 2 study (NCT03222609) evaluating the combination of navitoclax with ruxolitinib in pts with MF are reported. Methods: This phase 2 single-arm, multicenter, open-label study assessed the efficacy and safety of navitoclax combined with ruxolitinib in pts with MF. Eligible pts (≥18 yr, diagnosis of primary MF, post-essential thrombocythemia [PET]-MF, or post-polycythemia vera [PPV]-MF, ECOG 0-2, receiving at least 12 wk of continuous ruxolitinib therapy prior to study Tx initiation) received a starting dose of 50 mg navitoclax once-daily combined with the current stable dose of ruxolitinib (≥10 mg BID). Weekly intra-patient dose-escalation of navitoclax was allowed to a maximum daily dose of 300 mg based on tolerability and platelet count. Tx continued until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage reduction in splenic volume from baseline. Secondary endpoints included effect on total symptom score (TSS), overall response rate, rate of anemia response, improvement in BMF, and safety profile. Results: As of May 1, 2019, 34 pts (primary MF, n=16; PET-MF, n=5; PPV-MF, n=13) had received ≥1 dose of navitoclax in combination with ruxolitinib. Median age was 68 yr (range 42-86), 68% were male, and 9 pts (26%) had ≥3 prior lines of MF therapy. The median duration of prior ruxolitinib exposure was 745 days (range 134-4549). Of the 34 pts enrolled, 27 (79%) had JAK2 and 7 pts (21%) had CALR mutations. There were no pts enrolled with triple-negative MF. Of 33 pts with available baseline testing, 17 (52%) had high molecular risk, defined by mutations within ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, SRSF2, or U2AF1. The mean baseline platelet count was 231 x 109/L (range 99-706); mean baseline Hgb was 10.8 g/dL; 19 (56%) pts had elevated WBC at baseline (>1.5× ULN). Maximal navitoclax dose of 300 mg was achieved in 23 pts (68%). Of the 25 (74%) pts that enrolled on ruxolitinib doses >10 mg BID, 22 (88%) subsequently had the dose of ruxolitinib reduced to 10 mg BID. At the time of this analysis, 24 pts were evaluable for efficacy, with 20 pts completing ≥24 wk on study and 4 pts with Tx discontinuations prior to 24 wk. At wk 24, 7 of 24 pts (29%) achieved a spleen volume reduction of ≥35% (SVR35) from baseline by MRI as determined by prespecified central review; the median TSS was 7.4 (range 0-23), a 20% improvement from baseline. A SVR35 at any time on study was achieved in 10 pts (42%). Reductions in driver mutation allelic burden of >5% were observed in 10 (42%) pts; 6 pts (25%) had BMF improvement of ≥1 grade. One pt (4%) had an anemia response; the mean Hgb at wk 24 was slightly improved over baseline at 11.3 g/dL. Of the 19 pts with elevated baseline WBC, 16 (84%) reduced to within normal limits during Tx, with a median WBC reduction of 17.7 × 109/L. All pts experienced a Tx-emergent adverse event (TEAE); most common (≥20%) were thrombocytopenia (82%), diarrhea (62%), fatigue (53%), anemia (27%), nausea (27%), contusion (24%), and vomiting (21%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 26 pts (77%); most common were thrombocytopenia (n=15, 44%; Grade 4 n=1, 3%) and anemia (n=8, 24%; no Grade 4). Five pts (15%) experienced serious AEs that resolved including anemia, upper abdominal pain, vomiting, chest pain, increased C-reactive protein, and abnormal liver function test (3% each). There were no significant episodes of bleeding and no TEAE-related deaths. Conclusions: Navitoclax in combination with ruxolitinib was well tolerated with clinically meaningful spleen responses, allelic burden reductions, TSS improvements, and encouraging improvements in BMF in pts with MF who have received prior Tx with ruxolitinib. Disclosures Harrison: CTI: Speakers Bureau; Promedior: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Garcia:Genentech: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Mesa:CTI: Research Funding; Galena Biopharma: Consultancy; Samus: Research Funding; Genotech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy; LaJolla: Consultancy; Shire: Honoraria; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Promedior: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Incyte: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy. Somervaille:Novartis: Consultancy. Komrokji:pfizer: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; JAZZ: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau. Pemmaraju:sagerstrong: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; mustangbio: Consultancy, Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; affymetrix: Research Funding. Papadantonakis:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Foran:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. O'Connell:Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Holes:AbbVie Inc: Employment, Other: Stock/stock options. Jia:AbbVie: Employment, Other: Stock/stock options. Harb:AbbVie Inc: Employment, Other: Stock/stock options. Hutti:AbbVie: Employment, Other: Stock/stock options.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Hohtari, Helena, Shady Awad, Olli Dufva, Swapnil Potdar, Caroline A. Heckman, Krister Wennerberg, Satu Mustjoki, and Kimmo Porkka. "Targeting BCL-2, BCL-XL, BCL-W and MDM2 in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Highly Effective Ex Vivo." Blood 132, Supplement 1 (November 29, 2018): 3975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-110610.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Despite the advances in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a major fraction of adult patients still succumb to leukemia- or treatment-related events. In particular, the outcome of elderly ALL patients remains dismal. Our aim was to discover new or repurposed drugs for B-cell ALL in a clinically relevant ex vivo drug sensitivity testing platform. We analyzed 19 primary B-ALL samples using a well-established drug sensitivity and resistance testing platform and a drug panel including 65 drugs in five different concentrations. The main drug classes were glucocorticoids, MDM2 antagonists, and inhibitors of BCR-ABL1, VEGFR, BCL-2, BCL-XL, BET, MEK, JAK, Aurora kinase, PI3K, MTOR, IGF1R, ERK, STAT3, STAT5, HSP90 and NAMPT proteins. The samples were viably frozen bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells collected at diagnosis. The cohort included both Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) (n=10) and Ph-negative (Ph-) (n=9) patients with a median age of 43 years (range 22-68). Cell viability (CellTiter-Glo) was measured after plating and after a three-day incubation with the drugs. A drug sensitivity score (DSS) was calculated from the viability readouts, which takes into account the area under the dose response curve, measuring both drug efficacy and potency. DSS values >10 are considered effective and >20 highly effective. As an overall view of drug sensitivity, a heatmap and dendrograms from DSS values are shown in Figure 1A. As expected, most patients were sensitive to glucocorticoids and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) showed efficacy in Ph+ ALL. In addition, two Ph-negative patients were sensitive to TKIs, suggesting a Philadelphia-like disease. Drugs that showed pan-ALL efficacy included BCL-2 family inhibitors, idasanutlin (MDM2 inhibitor), luminespib (HSP90 inhibitor), daporinad (NMPRT inhibitor) and plicamycin (antineoplastic antibiotic). For the other drugs, only individual patients showed sensitivity, in line with the diverse molecular background of ALL. Strikingly, 17/19 (89%) of patients in our cohort were highly sensitive (DSS>20) to navitoclax (a BCL-2, BCL-XL and BCL-W inhibitor), whereas the BCL-2-specific inhibitor venetoclax was effective only in a distinct subset of patients (Figure 1B). 6/19 (32%) of patients were highly sensitive (DSS>20) to venetoclax and represented all risk classes based on age, white blood cell counts and karyotype, but interestingly, all were Ph-negative. Overall, response to venetoclax correlated with response to navitoclax (Spearman, r=0.85; P<0.0001). To examine differential gene expression of anti-apoptotic proteins between Ph+ and Ph- patients, we analyzed microarray gene expression data from ArrayExpress public database (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress, E-MTAB-5035). The analyzed cohort included 96 Ph- and 41 Ph+ adult B-ALL patients. Ph-negative samples were characterized with higher BCL-2 expression, whereas Ph-positive samples showed higher BCL-W expression and a trend to higher BCL-XL expression (Figure 1C). Thus, lack of venetoclax efficacy ex vivo in Ph-positive ALL indicated dependence on BCL-W and BCL-XL, as also reflected in the gene expression analyses. Inhibitors of BCL-2, such as navitoclax and venetoclax, potently induce apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells. Both inhibitors showed promising efficacy in our B-ALL samples. Dose-limiting thrombocytopenia has limited the use of navitoclax in solid tumors. However, in our assay navitoclax showed more uniform potency, particularly in Ph+ samples suggesting a rational combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Similar to conventional cytotoxic agents used in ALL, a therapeutic window may exist for safe use of navitoclax in acute leukemia. In conclusion, targeting the multidomain anti-apoptotic proteins (BCL-2, BCL-XL, BCL-W, MCL-1) and TP53 with MDM2, possibly in combination, is a promising strategy for improving outcome of adult B-ALL. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Hohtari: Incyte: Research Funding. Heckman:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Orion Pharma: Research Funding. Wennerberg:Novartis: Research Funding. Mustjoki:Ariad: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Porkka:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Potluri, Jalaja, Jason Harb, Abdullah A. Masud, and Jessica E. Hutti. "A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study Evaluating Navitoclax in Combination with Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis (TRANSFORM-1)." Blood 136, Supplement 1 (November 5, 2020): 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-139758.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm with poor clinical outcomes. It is characterized by bone marrow fibrosis and an array of constitutional symptoms that impair quality of life. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only potential curative therapy for MF, but HSCT is only accessible to a minority of patients and is associated with high morbidity and high rates of transplant-related mortality. JAK inhibitors (JAKi), including the JAK1/2i ruxolitinib and JAK2i fedratinib, are approved for the treatment of primary and secondary MF based on reduction in splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms; however, they have little impact on bone marrow fibrosis and are not effective at managing all clinical manifestations of MF. Therefore, a substantial clinical need for novel therapies to improve the disease course of MF exists. Navitoclax is an oral, potent, small-molecule inhibitor of the antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) family proteins BCL-XL, BCL-2, and BCL-w and has demonstrated cell-killing activity in myeloproliferative neoplasm-derived cell lines and primary specimens ex vivo. Preliminary data from a Phase 2 study (NCT03222609) of ruxolitinib-experienced patients with primary or secondary MF have shown favorable spleen responses and tolerability with navitoclax plus ruxolitinib (Harrison et al. EHA 2020. EP1081). TRANSFORM-1 aims to evaluate the combination of navitoclax and ruxolitinib vs placebo and ruxolitinib in adults with primary or secondary MF who have not previously received a JAK2i. Study Design and Methods: In this Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04472598), patients aged ≥18 years with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF with measurable splenomegaly, evidence of MF-related symptoms, no prior treatment with JAK2i, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score ≤2 will be eligible for enrollment. Candidates for allo-HSCT and those who have received prior treatment with a BH3-mimetic compound or BET inhibitor will be excluded. Patients will be enrolled across 130 sites in approximately 17 countries. Planned target enrollment is 230 patients. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive navitoclax or placebo, plus ruxolitinib. Randomization stratification factors include intermediate-2 vs high-risk MF and platelet count ≤200 × 109/L vs >200 × 109/L. Navitoclax will be administered orally at a starting dose of 200 mg (platelet count >150 × 109/L) or 100 mg escalated to 200 mg once daily if tolerated after ≥7 days (platelet count ≤150 × 109/L). Ruxolitinib will be administered orally at a starting dose of 20 mg (platelet count >200 × 109/L) or 15 mg (platelet count 100-200 × 109/L) twice daily. Treatment may continue until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation criteria have been met. Patients who discontinue without progression will enter post-treatment follow-up; after disease progression or initiation of post-treatment cancer therapy, patients will enter survival follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study is ≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline (SVR35) at Week 24, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, per International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Secondary endpoints include ≥50% reduction in total symptom score from baseline at Week 24 (measured by Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v4.0), duration of SVR35, change in fatigue from baseline, time to deterioration of physical functioning, anemia response per IWG criteria, SVR35 per IWG, reduction in grade of bone marrow fibrosis from baseline, overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and overall response and composite response per IWG criteria. Exploratory endpoints include progression-free survival. Safety will be assessed throughout the study via adverse event (AE) monitoring, physical examinations, vital sign measurements, electrocardiogram variables, and clinical laboratory testing. AEs will be graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs v5.0. The primary statistical analysis will be conducted using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, and time-to-event secondary endpoints will be analyzed using a stratified log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios will be estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Disclosures Potluri: AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Harb:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Masud:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options . Hutti:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. OffLabel Disclosure: Navitoclax is an investigational drug for the treatment of myelofibrosis

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Barrera-Vázquez, Oscar Salvador, Juan Carlos Gómez-Verjan, and Gil Alfonso Magos-Guerrero. "Chemoinformatic Screening for the Selection of Potential Senolytic Compounds from Natural Products." Biomolecules 11, no. 3 (March 22, 2021): 467. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom11030467.

Full text

Abstract:

Cellular senescence is a cellular condition that involves significant changes in gene expression and the arrest of cell proliferation. Recently, it has been suggested in experimental models that the elimination of senescent cells with pharmacological methods delays, prevents, and improves multiple adverse outcomes related to age. In this sense, the so-called senoylitic compounds are a class of drugs that selectively eliminates senescent cells (SCs) and that could be used in order to delay such adverse outcomes. Interestingly, the first senolytic drug (navitoclax) was discovered by using chemoinformatic and network analyses. Thus, in the present study, we searched for novel senolytic compounds through the use of chemoinformatic tools (fingerprinting and network pharmacology) over different chemical databases (InflamNat and BIOFACQUIM) coming from natural products (NPs) that have proven to be quite remarkable for drug development. As a result of screening, we obtained three molecules (hinokitiol, preussomerin C, and tanshinone I) that could be considered senolytic compound candidates since they share similarities in structure with senolytic leads (tunicamycin, ginsenoside Rb1, ABT 737, rapamycin, navitoclax, timosaponin A-III, digoxin, roxithromycin, and azithromycin) and targets involved in senescence pathways with potential use in the treatment of age-related diseases.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

DeSimone, Dennis C., Trung T. Nguyen, Eugen Brailiou, John C. Taylor, Gabriela Cristina Brailoiu, Jeff Boyd, and Eric A. Ariazi. "Evaluation of GPER agonist G-1 combined with navitoclax in platinum-resistant and -sensitive ovarian cancer cells." Journal of Clinical Oncology 31, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2013): e13563-e13563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e13563.

Full text

Abstract:

e13563 Background: Most ovarian cancer patients are treated with platinum-based chemotherapy but eventually relapse with incurable disease. The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER (GPR30) mediates Ca2+ mobilization in response to estrogen and G-1, a synthetic agonist. Large and sustained Ca2+ responses can lead to mitochondrial Ca2+ overload and apoptosis. Hence, we evaluated whether G-1 could induce apoptosis in cisplatin-sensitive A2780 and isogenic cisplatin–resistant CP70 (14-fold resistant), C30 (70-fold resistant) and C200 (157-fold resistant) human ovarian cancer cells. Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL protect mitochondria from Ca2+overload, and were overexpressed in these cisplatin-resistant cells; thus we also examined combining the Bcl-2 family inhibitor navitoclax with G-1. Methods: Cytoplasmic [Ca2+]c and mitochondrial [Ca2+]m were monitored using microscopy and fluorescent Ca2+ probes. Cell cycle, apoptosis and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) were assessed by flow cytometry of propidium iodide, Annexin V and DiIC1(5) -stained cells. The intracellular Ca2+ chelator BAPTA was used to block Ca2+mobilization. Results: Expression of the 53kDa GPER but not the 38 kDa isoform progressively increased with increasing cisplatin resistance. G-1 elicited sustained [Ca2+]c rises that correlated with 53 kDa GPER expression, followed by rises in [Ca2+]m. In all cells, 2.5 μM G-1 blocked cell cycle progression at G2/M, inhibited proliferation, and induced apoptosis (A2780 > C30 > CP70 ≥ C200). G-1 induced p53, caspase-3 and PARP cleavage, and MMP loss. BAPTA prevented G-1’s cell cycle and apoptotic effects in cells showing large Ca2+ mobilization responses but did not in cells with small Ca2+responses. Combining navitoclax with G-1 superadditively decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis. Conclusions: G-1 blocked cell cycle progression and induced apoptosis via a Ca2+-dependent pathway in cells expressing high 53 kDa GPER levels, but via a Ca2+-independent pathway in cells with low 53 kDa GPER expression. G-1 also interacted cooperatively with naviticlax. Therefore, G-1 plus navitoclax shows potential for therapeutic use in platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Jia, Kangni, Yang Dai, Ao Liu, Xiang Li, Liqun Wu, Lin Lu, Yangyang Bao, and Qi Jin. "Senolytic Agent Navitoclax Inhibits Angiotensin II-Induced Heart Failure in Mice." Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 76, no. 4 (October 2020): 452–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/fjc.0000000000000878.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Pons, Miriam, Yanira Zeyn, Stella Zahn, Nisintha Mahendrarajah, Brent D. G. Page, Patrick T. Gunning, Richard Moriggl, Walburgis Brenner, Falk Butter, and Oliver H. Krämer. "Oncogenic Kinase Cascades Induce Molecular Mechanisms That Protect Leukemic Cell Models from Lethal Effects of De Novo dNTP Synthesis Inhibition." Cancers 13, no. 14 (July 10, 2021): 3464. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13143464.

Full text

Abstract:

The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor hydroxyurea suppresses de novo dNTP synthesis and attenuates the hyperproliferation of leukemic blasts. Mechanisms that determine whether cells undergo apoptosis in response to hydroxyurea are ill-defined. We used unbiased proteomics to uncover which pathways control the transition of the hydroxyurea-induced replication stress into an apoptotic program in chronic and acute myeloid leukemia cells. We noted a decrease in the serine/threonine kinase RAF1/c-RAF in cells that undergo apoptosis in response to clinically relevant doses of hydroxyurea. Using the RAF inhibitor LY3009120, we show that RAF activity determines the sensitivity of leukemic cells toward hydroxyurea. We further disclose that pharmacological inhibition of the RAF downstream target BCL-XL with the drug navitoclax and RNAi combine favorably with hydroxyurea against leukemic cells. BCR-ABL1 and hyperactive FLT3 are tyrosine kinases that causally contribute to the development of leukemia and induce RAF1 and BCL-XL. Accordingly, the ABL inhibitor imatinib and the FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib sensitize leukemic cells to pro-apoptotic effects of hydroxyurea. Moreover, hydroxyurea and navitoclax kill leukemic cells with mutant FLT3 that are resistant to quizartinib. These data reveal cellular susceptibility factors toward hydroxyurea and how they can be exploited to eliminate difficult-to-treat leukemic cells with clinically relevant drug combinations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Wong, Maureen, Nguyen Tan, Jiping Zha, Franklin V. Peale, Peng Yue, Wayne J. Fairbrother, and Lisa D. Belmont. "Navitoclax (ABT-263) Reduces Bcl-xL–Mediated Chemoresistance in Ovarian Cancer Models." Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 11, no. 4 (February 1, 2012): 1026–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.mct-11-0693.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Sierra-Ramirez, Arantzazu, José Luis López-Aceituno, Luis Filipe Costa-Machado, Adrián Plaza, Marta Barradas, and Pablo Jose Fernandez-Marcos. "Transient metabolic improvement in obese mice treated with navitoclax or dasatinib/quercetin." Aging 12, no. 12 (June 25, 2020): 11337–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.103607.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Kaefer, Aksana, Jianning Yang, Peter Noertersheuser, Sven Mensing, Rod Humerickhouse, Walid Awni, and Hao Xiong. "Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analysis of navitoclax (ABT-263) induced thrombocytopenia." Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 74, no. 3 (July 23, 2014): 593–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2530-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Lomovsky, Alexey, Yulia Baburina, Irina Odinokova, Margarita Kobyakova, Yana Evstratova, Linda Sotnikova, Roman Krestinin, and Olga Krestinina. "Melatonin Can Modulate the Effect of Navitoclax (ABT-737) in HL-60 Cells." Antioxidants 9, no. 11 (November 18, 2020): 1143. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9111143.

Full text

Abstract:

Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine MEL) is an indolamine that has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor properties. Moreover, MEL is capable of exhibiting both anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic effects. In the normal cells, MEL possesses antioxidant property and has an anti-apoptotic effect, while in the cancer cells it has pro-apoptotic action. We investigated the combined effect of MEL and navitoclax (ABT-737), which promotes cell death, on the activation of proliferation in acute promyelocytic leukemia on a cell model HL-60. The combined effect of these compounds leads to a reduction of the index of mitotic activity. The alterations in the level of anti- and pro-apoptotic proteins such as BclxL, Bclw, Mcl-1, and BAX, membrane potential, Ca2+ retention capacity, and ROS production under the combined action of MEL and ABT-737 were performed. We obtained that MEL in combination with ABT-737 decreased Ca2+ capacity, dropped membrane potential, increased ROS production, suppressed the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins such as BclxL, Bclw, and Mcl-1, and enhanced the expression of pro-apoptotic BAX. Since, MEL modulates autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in cancer cells, the combined effect of MEL and ABT-737 on the expression of ER stress and autophagy markers was checked. The combined effect of MEL and ABT-737 (0.2 μM) increased the expression of protein kinase R (PKR)-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), leading to a decrease in the level of binding immunoglobulin protein (BIP) followed by an increase in the level of C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP). In this condition, the expression of ERO1 decreased, which could lead to a decrease in the level of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI). The obtained data suggested that melatonin has potential usefulness in the treatment of cancer, where it is able to modulate ER stress, autophagy and apoptosis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Nakajima, Wataru, Kanika Sharma, Mark A. Hicks, Ngoc Le, Rikiara Brown, Geoffrey W. Krystal, and Hisashi Harada. "Combination with vorinostat overcomes ABT-263 (navitoclax) resistance of small cell lung cancer." Cancer Biology & Therapy 17, no. 1 (November 17, 2015): 27–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2015.1108485.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Stamelos, Vasileios A., Elizabeth Robinson, Charles W. Redman, and Alan Richardson. "Navitoclax augments the activity of carboplatin and paclitaxel combinations in ovarian cancer cells." Gynecologic Oncology 128, no. 2 (February 2013): 377–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.019.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Kour, Smit, Sandeep Rana, Jacob I. Contreras, Hannah M. King, Caroline M. Robb, Yogesh A. Sonawane, Mourad Bendjennat, et al. "CDK5 Inhibitor Downregulates Mcl-1 and Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines to Navitoclax." Molecular Pharmacology 96, no. 4 (August 29, 2019): 419–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.119.116855.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Rubnitz, Jeffrey E., Thomas B. Alexander, Theodore W. Laetsch, Seong Lin Khaw, Vinod A. Pullarkat, Joseph T. Opferman, Kathryn G. Roberts, et al. "Venetoclax and Navitoclax in Pediatric Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma." Blood 136, Supplement 1 (November 5, 2020): 12–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-134582.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Improved therapeutic strategies for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) remain an unmet need. Venetoclax (Ven), a potent, highly selective, oral B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor, and navitoclax (Nav), an oral BCL-2, BCL-XL, and BCL-W inhibitor, directly bind their BCL-2 family member targets to promote apoptosis. Ven and Nav have shown synergistic antileukemic effects in ALL preclinical models, suggesting dependence on BCL-2 family members. The addition of Ven to low-dose Nav may potentiate efficacy without the dose-limiting thrombocytopenia associated with Nav monotherapy (J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:488). Ven in combination with Nav and chemotherapy are under investigation in a Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study in patients with R/R ALL and LL (NCT03181126). The results of a previous report on the overall study population (adult and pediatric patients) showed the triplet combination was well tolerated, with promising response rates observed (Jabbour, et al. EHA 2020. Abstract 2389). For the first time, reported here are safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of Ven with Nav and chemotherapy among the pediatric patients treated in that Phase 1 study. Methods: Eligible pediatric patients (aged ≥4-<18 years and weight ≥20 kg) with R/R ALL and LL were enrolled to receive 400 mg Ven (weight-adjusted equivalent) daily. Nav was administered daily at 3 dose levels (25, 50, 100 mg) for patients weighing ≥45 kg and 2 dose levels (25, 50 mg) for patients weighing <45 kg. Dose escalation decisions were guided by Bayesian optimal interval design. Patients could receive chemotherapy (PEG-asparaginase, vincristine, and dexamethasone) at the investigator's discretion. Primary outcome measures included safety assessments and pharmacokinetics. Secondary outcome measures included efficacy assessments. Exploratory biomarker assessments included evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD). A safety expansion cohort assessed a discontinuous dosing schedule, 21 days on and 7 days off, of Ven with 50 mg Nav (25 mg for patients weighing <45 kg). Results: As of June 23, 2020, 18 pediatric patients (pts) have enrolled (12 in dose-escalation; 6 in safety expansion); 13, 3, and 2 pts had B-ALL, T-ALL, and LL, respectively. Among pts in the dose-escalation phase, 6 received 25 mg Nav and 6 received 50 mg. Median age was 10 years (range, 6-16 years), 56% of pts were male, and the median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-6). Median time on study was 10.4 months. All pediatric pts experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and the most common were febrile neutropenia (50%), vomiting (44%), hyperglycemia (39%), and hypokalemia (39%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 89% of pediatric pts, and the most common were febrile neutropenia (50%), neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (33%), and anemia (28%). The only Grade 3/4 nonhematologic TEAEs related to Ven or Nav that occurred in >1 pediatric pt were alanine aminotransferase increased (n=2) and vomiting (n=2). Of 8 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), 2 occurred in pediatric pts. The 2 DLTs included delayed count recovery (25 mg Nav) and sepsis (50 mg Nav, occurred after database lock). No pediatric pts experienced tumor lysis syndrome. No Grade 5 TEAEs occurred in pediatric pts; 8 pediatric pts (44%) died from disease progression. Ten pediatric pts (56%) achieved complete response (CR)/CR incomplete recovery (CRi)/CR without platelet recovery (CRp); 7 pts (39%) achieved undetectable MRD. Median overall survival was 11.4 months (95% CI, 2.9 months-not estimable). Eight pts (44%) proceeded to transplantation (n=5) or CAR T-cell therapy (n=3; cells harvested before start of study; Figure). Weight-based dosing of Ven and Nav achieved comparable exposures in pediatric pts. Exploratory correlative biomarker analyses, including BH3 profiling and genomic analyses, are underway and will be presented. Conclusion: In this Phase 1 study, Ven with Nav and chemotherapy was well tolerated and had promising efficacy in heavily pretreated pediatric patients with ALL and LL. Given that there were four DLTs with 100 mg Nav without evidence of increased efficacy, the recommended Phase 2 dose for adult and pediatric patients is 400 mg Ven with 50 mg Nav for patients weighing ≥45 kg and 25 mg Nav for patients weighing <45 kg. Figure Disclosures Rubnitz: AbbVie Inc.: Research Funding. Alexander:Abbvie, Inc.: Other: Travel Support. Laetsch:Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Khaw:Amgen: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Travel Support; AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research: Patents & Royalties: recipient of a share in royalty payments . Pullarkat:Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Dova: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Opferman:St. Jude Children's Research Hospital: Current Employment; AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding; National Institutes of Health: Research Funding. Rosenwinkel:AbbVie, Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Tong:AbbVie, Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Pesko:AbbVie, Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Badawi:AbbVie, Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Vishwamitra:AbbVie, Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Kim:AbbVie, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months, Other: may hold stock or other options. Mullighan:Illumina: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Yes, venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor that is FDA approved for some indications. Venetoclax for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia is not an approved indication.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Cleary, J. M., C. M. S. Rocha Lima, H. Hurwitz, A. J. Montero, G. Shapiro, C. Franklin, J. Yang, et al. "Combination study of navitoclax with gemcitabine (G) in patients (pts) with solid tumors." Journal of Clinical Oncology 29, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2011): 3067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.3067.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Tan, Nguyen, Mehnaz Malek, Jiping Zha, Peng Yue, Robert Kassees, Leanne Berry, Wayne J. Fairbrother, Deepak Sampath, and Lisa D. Belmont. "Navitoclax Enhances the Efficacy of Taxanes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Models." Clinical Cancer Research 17, no. 6 (January 10, 2011): 1394–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-2353.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Li, Gongquan, Shuijun Zhang, Hongbo Fang, Bing Yan, Yongfu Zhao, Liushun Feng, Xiuxian Ma, and Xuexiang Ye. "Aspirin overcomes Navitoclax-resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through suppression of Mcl-1." Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 434, no. 4 (May 2013): 809–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.04.018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Zhang, Meili, Lesley A. Mathews Griner, Wei Ju, Damien Y. Duveau, Rajarshi Guha, Michael N. Petrus, Bernard Wen, et al. "Selective targeting of JAK/STAT signaling is potentiated by Bcl-xL blockade in IL-2–dependent adult T-cell leukemia." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, no. 40 (September 22, 2015): 12480–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516208112.

Full text

Abstract:

Adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) develops in individuals infected with human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1). Presently there is no curative therapy for ATL. HTLV-1–encoded protein Tax (transactivator from the X-gene region) up-regulates Bcl-xL (B-cell lymphoma-extra large) expression and activates interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-9, and IL-15 autocrine/paracrine systems, resulting in amplified JAK/STAT signaling. Inhibition of JAK signaling reduces cytokine-dependent ex vivo proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from ATL patients in smoldering/chronic stages. Currently, two JAK inhibitors are approved for human use. In this study, we examined activity of multiple JAK inhibitors in ATL cell lines. The selective JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib was examined in a high-throughput matrix screen combined with >450 potential therapeutic agents, and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitor navitoclax was identified as a strong candidate for multicomponent therapy. The combination was noted to strongly activate BAX (Bcl-2-associated X protein), effect mitochondrial depolarization, and increase caspase 3/7 activities that lead to cleavage of PARP (poly ADP ribose polymerase) and Mcl-1 (myeloid cell leukemia 1). Ruxolitinib and navitoclax independently demonstrated modest antitumor efficacy, whereas the combination dramatically lowered tumor burden and prolonged survival in an ATL murine model. This combination strongly blocked ex vivo proliferation of five ATL patients’ PBMCs. These studies provide support for a therapeutic trial in patients with smoldering/chronic ATL using a drug combination that inhibits JAK signaling and antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Toren, Amos, Michal Yalon, Aner Dafni, and Ruty Mehrian-Shai. "HGG-04. ZINC ENHANCES TEMOZOLOMIDE CYTOTOXICITY IN PEDIATRIC GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME MODEL SYSTEM." Neuro-Oncology 22, Supplement_3 (December 1, 2020): iii344—iii345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.295.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract BACKGROUND Temozolomide (TMZ) is an alkylating agent that has become the mainstay treatment of the most malignant brain cancer, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Unfortunately only a limited number of patients respond to it positively. We have shown that zinc metal reestablishes chemosensitivity in adult GBM in vitro and also in vivo but this effect has not been tested with pediatric GBM. METHODS Using Human pediatric glioblastoma cell lines- KNS42 (mutant p53/ MGMT [+]) and SF188 (mutant p53/ MGMT [-]), we investigated whether addition of zinc to TMZ enhances its cytotoxicity against GBM. RESULTS In vitro cell viability analysis showed that the cytotoxic activity of TMZ was substantially increased with addition of zinc and this response was accompanied by an elevation of p21, PUMA, BAX and a decrease in growth fraction as manifested by low ki67. Beta gal analysis showed that most of the remaining cells after the combination therapy are in senescence state. In order to eliminate the senescent population created as a result of the combined treatment of TMZ and Zinc, we decided to use a senolytic agent Navitoclax (ABT-263) that was demonstrated to be effective in reducing senescent cells by specific inhibition of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL and Bcl-w. Following the addition of Navitoclax to the combined treatment, SF188 cells, but not KNS42, show a significance reduction in viability compare to the combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that zinc may serve as a potentiator of TMZ therapy in pediatric GBM patients and using a second hit with senolytic drug in some cases may be even more beneficial.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Qing, Yingjie, Hui Li, Yunzi Zhao, Po Hu, Xiangyuan Wang, Xiaoxuan Yu, Mengyuan Zhu, et al. "One-Two Punch Therapy for the Treatment of T-Cell Malignancies Involving p53-Dependent Cellular Senescence." Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2021 (September 21, 2021): 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5529518.

Full text

Abstract:

T-cell malignancies are still difficult to treat due to a paucity of plans that target critical dependencies. Drug-induced cellular senescence provides a permanent cell cycle arrest during tumorigenesis and cancer development, particularly when combined with senolytics to promote apoptosis of senescent cells, which is an innovation for cancer therapy. Here, our research found that wogonin, a well-known natural flavonoid compound, not only had a potential to inhibit cell growth and proliferation but also induced cellular senescence in T-cell malignancies with nonlethal concentration. Transcription activity of senescence-suppression human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and oncogenic C-MYC was suppressed in wogonin-induced senescent cells, resulting in the inhibition of telomerase activity. We also substantiated the occurrence of DNA damage during the wogonin-induced aging process. Results showed that wogonin increased the activity of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal) and activated the DNA damage response pathway mediated by p53. In addition, we found the upregulated expression of BCL-2 in senescent T-cell malignancies because of the antiapoptotic properties of senescent cells. Following up this result, we identified a BCL-2 inhibitor Navitoclax (ABT-263), which was highly effective in decreasing cell viability and inducing apoptotic cell death in wogonin-induced senescent cells. Thus, the “one-two punch” approach increased the sensibility of T-cell malignancies with low expression of BCL-2 to Navitoclax. In conclusion, our research revealed that wogonin possesses potential antitumor effects based on senescence induction, offering a better insight into the development of novel therapeutic methods for T-cell malignancies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Rahman, Masum, Ian E. Olson, Rehan Saber, Jibo Zhang, Lucas P. Carlstrom, Chen Sisi, Karishma Rajani, et al. "CBIO-11. NOVEL THERAPY TO TARGET PR-RECURRENT GLIOMA." Neuro-Oncology 22, Supplement_2 (November 2020): ii17—ii18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.071.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is a fatal infiltrative primary brain tumor, and standard care includes maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiation and Temozolomide (TMZ). Therapy-resistant residual cells persist in a latent state a long time before inevitable recurrence. Conventional radiation and Temozolomide (TMZ) treatment cause oxidative stress and DNA damage resulting senescent-like state of cell-cycle arrest. However, increasing evidence demonstrates escaping senescence leads to tumor recurrence. Thus, the ablation of senescent tumor cells after chemoradiation may be an avenue to limit tumor recurrence. METHODS 100uM TMZ for 7days or 10-20Gy radiation (cesium gamma radiator) was used for senescence induction in human glioblastoma in vitro and confirmed by SA-Beta gal staining and PCR. Replication arrest assessed by automated quantification of cellular confluence (Thermo Scientific Series 8000 WJ Incubator). We evaluated the IC50 for several senolytics targeting multiple SCAPs, including Dasatinib, Quercetin, AMG-232, Fisetin, Onalespib, Navitoclax, and A1331852, and in senescent vs. proliferating cells. RESULTS Among the senolytic tested, the Bcl-XL inhibitors A1331852 and Navitoclax both shown senolytic effect by selectively killing radiated, senescent tumor cells at lower concentrations as compared to 0Gy treated non-senescent cells. Across 12 GBM cell lines, IC50 for senescent cells was 6–500 times lower than non-senescent GBM(p< 0.005). Such differential sensitivity to Bcl-XL inhibition after radiation has also observed by BCL-XL knockdown in radiated glioma. CONCLUSION These findings suggest the potential to harness radiation-induced biology to ablate surviving quiescent cells and demonstrate Bcl-XL dependency as a potential vulnerability of surviving tumor cells after exposure to chemoradiation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Kivioja, Jarno L., Angeliki Thanasopoulou, Ashwini Kumar, Mika Kontro, Bhagwan Yadav, Muntasir M. Majumder, Komal K. Javarappa, et al. "Dasatinib and navitoclax act synergistically to target NUP98-NSD1+/FLT3-ITD+ acute myeloid leukemia." Leukemia 33, no. 6 (December 19, 2018): 1360–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0327-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Lam, Lloyd T., Xin Lu, Haichao Zhang, Rick Lesniewski, Saul Rosenberg, and Dimitri Semizarov. "A MicroRNA Screen to Identify Modulators of Sensitivity to BCL2 Inhibitor ABT-263 (Navitoclax)." Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 9, no. 11 (September 9, 2010): 2943–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.mct-10-0427.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Shi, Jue, Yuan Zhou, Hsiao-Chun Huang, and Timothy J. Mitchison. "Navitoclax (ABT-263) Accelerates Apoptosis during Drug-Induced Mitotic Arrest by Antagonizing Bcl-xL." Cancer Research 71, no. 13 (May 5, 2011): 4518–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-4336.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Chyla, B., M. Smith, S. Tahir, W. Wilson, O. O'Connor, M. Czuczman, J. Gerecitano, S. Enschede, A. Krivoshik, and E. McKeegan. "611 Bcl-2 family protein expression in navitoclax-treated patients (pts) with lymphoid malignancies." European Journal of Cancer Supplements 8, no. 7 (November 2010): 192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6349(10)72318-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Chen, Binlong, Zhaoyang Wang, Jing Sun, Qin Song, Bing He, Hua Zhang, Xueqing Wang, Wenbing Dai, and Qiang Zhang. "A tenascin C targeted nanoliposome with navitoclax for specifically eradicating of cancer-associated fibroblasts." Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine 12, no. 1 (January 2016): 131–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2015.10.001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Rubens, Jeffrey, Sabrina Wang, Shreya Sharma, Smit Shah, Kathy Warren, Charles Eberhart, and Eric Raabe. "ATRT-38. TAK228 COMBINES WITH NAVITOCLAX TO ENHANCE PLATINUM-INDUCED CYTOTOXICITY IN AT/RT." Neuro-Oncology 20, suppl_2 (June 2018): i36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy059.035.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Walensky, Loren D. "From Mitochondrial Biology to Magic Bullet: Navitoclax Disarms BCL-2 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia." Journal of Clinical Oncology 30, no. 5 (February 10, 2012): 554–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.37.9339.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Sitia, Leopoldo, Arianna Bonizzi, Serena Mazzucchelli, Sara Negri, Cristina Sottani, Elena Grignani, Maria Antonietta Rizzuto, et al. "Selective Targeting of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts by Engineered H-Ferritin Nanocages Loaded with Navitoclax." Cells 10, no. 2 (February 5, 2021): 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020328.

Full text

Abstract:

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are key actors in regulating cancer progression. They promote tumor growth, metastasis formation, and induce drug resistance. For these reasons, they are emerging as potential therapeutic targets. Here, with the aim of developing CAF-targeted drug delivery agents, we functionalized H-ferritin (HFn) nanocages with fibroblast activation protein (FAP) antibody fragments. Functionalized nanocages (HFn-FAP) have significantly higher binding with FAP+ CAFs than with FAP− cancer cells. We loaded HFn-FAP with navitoclax (Nav), an experimental Bcl-2 inhibitor pro-apoptotic drug, whose clinical development is limited by its strong hydrophobicity and toxicity. We showed that Nav is efficiently loaded into HFn (HNav), maintaining its mechanism of action. Incubating Nav-loaded functionalized nanocages (HNav-FAP) with FAP+ cells, we found significantly higher cytotoxicity as compared to non-functionalized HNav. This was correlated with a significantly higher drug release only in FAP+ cells, confirming the specific targeting ability of functionalized HFn. Finally, we showed that HFn-FAP is able to reach the tumor and to target CAFs in a mouse syngeneic model of triple negative breast cancer after intravenous administration. Our data show that HNav-FAP could be a promising tool to enhance specific drug delivery into CAFs, thus opening new therapeutic possibilities focused on tumor microenvironment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Yamamoto, Masahiro, and Chifumi Kitanaka. "ET-6 Gemcitabine radiosensitization primes irradiated malignant meningioma cells for senolytic elimination by navitoclax." Neuro-Oncology Advances 3, Supplement_6 (December 1, 2021): vi4—vi5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab159.016.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract BACKGROUND: Malignant meningioma is an aggressive tumor that requires adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery, yet there has been no standard systemic therapy established so far. We have demonstrated that malignant meningioma cells are exquisitely sensitive to gemcitabine due to their increased expression of hENT1 and dCK, which play critical roles in the intracellular transport and activation of gemcitabine, respectively (Takeda et al. Oncotarget 8:90996, 2017; Yamamoto et al., Neuro-Oncol 23:945, 2021). Significantly, in support of our findings, the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine have recently been documented in a small case series of patients with recurrent meningiomas, which has further led to a phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine in recurrent high-grade meningiomas (Khaddar et al., South Asian J Cancer 9:261, 2020). Besides its efficacy as a single agent, gemcitabine reportedly has a radiosensitizing effect in pancreatic cancer. However, it remains unknown whether or how gemcitabine interacts with ionizing radiation (IR) in malignant meningioma cells. METHODS: We examined radiosensitization effects of gemcitabine using malignant meningioma cell lines and xenografts (s.c. and i.c.) and explored the underlying mechanisms. RESULTS: Gemcitabine sensitized malignant meningioma cells remarkably to IR through the induction of senescence both in vitro and in vivo. Gemcitabine augmented the intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by IR, which, together with cell growth suppression/senescence induced by this combination, was inhibited by N-acetyl-cysteine, suggesting a pivotal role for ROS in these combinatorial effects. Navitoclax, a senolytic drug, further enhanced the effects of the combination of gemcitabine and IR in vitro and in vivo by strongly inducing apoptotic cell death in senescent cells. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that gemcitabine is not only a promising radiosensitizer for malignant meningioma but also creates in combination with IR a therapeutic vulnerability of senescent meningioma cells to senolytics. (submitted for publication)

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Navitoclax'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles