Academic literature on the topic 'Neolithic'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Neolithic.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Neolithic"

1

Nowak, Marek. "Do We Finally Know What the Neolithic Is?" Open Archaeology 8, no. 1 (January 1, 2022): 332–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0204.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Over 20 years ago, an inspiring text by Lech Czerniak (The Neolithic – What’s That?) on understanding the concept of the Neolithic was published. For the present author, the Lech Czerniak’s discourse on the Neolithic was for many years and, to a large extent still is, a conceptual basis for understanding and presenting this issue. This contribution is an examination of the current relevance of Lech Czerniak’s theses. Furthermore, starting from this basis, a subjective attempt will be made to put the topic in some order, since a lack of clarity as to what the Neolithic is and what is not hampers and complicates research activities. Particularly, perhaps a fundamental issue will be assessed whether the concept of Neolithic in any measure reflects the past reality or reflects only our perceptions of that past. Conclusions resulted of the argumentation assume that there were indeed different and real Neolithics in the past. However, these Neolithics had a common denominator, in the form of “new” socio-organizational, ideological, mental, and consequently also meaning structures. They were a prerequisite for the existence of the Neolithic formation. Situations that can be labelled as the Neolithic are reflected archaeologically by the predominance of elements of the “Neolithic package” within a given sector of the cultural system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Fauzi, Mohammad Ruly. "Signifikansi tembikar tera-tali dari situs Ceruk Landai (Merangin, Jambi) dalam rekonstruksi ekspansi neolitik di bagian barat Indonesia." KALPATARU 26, no. 1 (September 25, 2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.24832/kpt.v26i1.229.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstrakEkskavasi situs Ceruk Landai (Kabupaten Merangin, Jambi) berhasil mengungkap adanya dua fase hunian neolitik yang berbeda melalui kajian artefaktual dan kontekstual pada temuan-temuannya. Data menarik diperoleh dari analisis ragam hias tera-tali atau cord-marked, jala, dan belah ketupat yang dihasilkan oleh alat tatap (paddle) yang digunakan (i.e. teknik paddle impressed). Tembikar bermotif hias cord-marked pada lapisan US c di Ceruk Landai membuktikan adanya hubungan antara masyarakat neolitik di Sumatra dengan kompleks tembikar Bau-Malay di Asia Tenggara Daratan. Hal tersebut menjadi bukti adanya kemungkinan ekspansi budaya neolitik dari arah barat melalui Semenanjung Malaya yang kemudian masuk ke Sumatra setidaknya sejak 3000 tahun yang lalu.Kata kunci: tera-tali, tembikar, ragam-hias, neolitikAbstractArchaeological excavation at Landai Rockshelter (Merangin District, Jambi) successfully unearthed two different phases of neolithic habitation through artifactual and contextual analysis on its remains. Interesting result came from the analysis on cord-marked, nets, and rhombus motif appeared on pottery fragments which are made by paddle-impressed technique. Cord-marked pottery from US c layer in Landai Rockshelter established a possible link between neolithic pottery traditions in Sumatra with the Bau-Malay pottery complex in the mainland of Southeast Asia. It became the evidence of a possible expansion of neolithic culture from the west through the Malay Peninsula then move southward into Sumatra at least 3000 years ago.Keywords: cord-marked, pottery, decoration, neolithic
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kotsakis, Kostas. "Mesolithic to Neolithic in Greece. Continuity, discontinuity or change of course?" Documenta Praehistorica 28 (December 22, 2001): 63–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/dp.28.4.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper reviews the status of the Mesolithic/Neolitihc interface in Greece. It is argued that the old dichotomy between “indigenists” and “diffusionists” concerning the neolithization of Greece is simplistic. Instead it is proposed that the discussion should be focused on two separate issues: one factual, emphasizing the form of phenomena and their archaeological description and one interpretive focusing more on content. Concerning the first issue, the hypothesis is made that the discontinuity in the Mesolithic/Neolithic interface is probably the result of the incomplete archaeological record and the biased research on long-term Neolithic sites in Thessaly. As for the second issue, the shift to the Neolithic can be better understood as an effort to control society and its conflicts by manipulating physical and conceptual resources and by constructing new identities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Brigić, Dženan. "Gornja Tuzla – prahistorijsko naselje sjeveroistočne Bosne / Gornja Tuzla - Prehistoric settlement of Northeastern Bosnia." Journal of BATHINVS Association ACTA ILLYRICA / Godišnjak Udruženja BATHINVS ACTA ILLYRICA Online ISSN 2744-1318, no. 2 (December 1, 2017): 27–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.54524/2490-3930.2018.27.

Full text
Abstract:
Gornja Tuzla is located on far slopes mountain Majevica, with upper streamof river Jala, aroun 10km from todays city of Tuzla, in the direction of northeast. This is a rather devastated locality, where the most damage has been done to youngest layer. Most of settlement, whose surface Čović estimates aroun 12 i1 5ha, based on findings of pottery fragments on the ground. Even today, at the bottom of tell, one can see a many fragments of local reddsish pottery from starčevo type. Đuro Basler was the first one who determined the existance of prehistoric settlement when he found grave from iron age. Later, Benac and Čović visited Gornja Tuzla and 1955. Čović opened a first probe, and after learning that cultural layers are going deeper into the ground, he opened another probe 1956, and 1957 where he digged all the way to the sterile soil. Next year, 1958. he opened the biggest probe, probe II (1958) and in that probe he determined complete stratigrapy of neolithich settlement Gornja Tuzla. According to his analysis, VI and deepest layer belongs to Stačevo culture of middle neolithic, and younger layers to the Vinča culture, and the youngest one to eneolithic culture which proved the continuity of life. Second and last excavation has been done in the years 2008/2009 when smaller probe was opened bu the results of research have never been published. Gornja Tuzla represents one of the most important settlements in Bosnia and Hercegovinia considering that with Obre I, has the deepest layers which dates from periodo of middle neolitihic and has the key role in understanding period of transition from middle neolitihic Starčevo to young neolithic Vinča culture.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Laili, Nurul, and Anton Ferdianto. "Ragam dan Morfoteknologi Artefak di Situs-Situs Neolitik Sepanjang Ci Langla Bagian Hilir, Kabupaten Tasikmalaya." PANALUNGTIK 3, no. 1 (September 28, 2020): 77–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.24164/pnk.v3i1.34.

Full text
Abstract:
Neolithic sites in the Karangnunggal Region along Ci Langla, starting from upstream to downstream. This paper will reveal the variety of neolithic artifacts in Ci Langla downstream. Thus it will be known about the activities of human life supporting neolithics in the area. Research on the distribution patterns and influencing factors is expected to be able to provide clues about human behavior patterns in utilizing space. The method used in the cultural approach focuses on archeological material or direct observation of artifacts (artifact oriented analysis). The artifacts analyzed are related to the activities of the adze workshop.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Cleary, Conor. "Neolithic." New England Review 44, no. 2 (2023): 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ner.2023.a901432.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Stojic, Milorad. "Response to the contribution: On Neolithic authenticity of finds from Belica by Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric." Starinar, no. 63 (2013): 301–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/sta1363301s.

Full text
Abstract:
In the last issue of Starinar (LXII/2012) a contribution On Neolithic Authenticity of Finds from Belica was published. The authors Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric (further A-P), dispute the 'Neolithic' provenience of finds from the village Belica. The reason is based on two articles published by me and possibly the pending publication in T?bingen of my monograph Belica, the Greatest Group Find of Neolithic Artistic Cult Sculpture. A-P based their conclusion that the objects from Belica are not 'Neolithic' on the premise that the pit with these objects did not exist, that the objects are of 'contemporary provenience', most probably made by 'an archeologist-amateur aiming to create confusion in Serbian archaeology', that there are 'no analogies for them', that the site in Belica represents 'a small Neolithic settlement', that 'objects were made mechanically' and that traces of fast revolving 'grinding instruments' are visible on them. Also, A-P cite me as the only author to have written about the find from Belica and who believes that the find belongs to the Neolithic period. Technical, geodetic and photo documentation from systematic excavations, as well as the homogeneity of protostarcevo material confirm the existence of a pit, belonging to early Neolith. Four radiocarbon tests prove, apart from the characteristics of the material and the analogies, that the objects are not 'contemporary provenience' but belong to the Early Neolithic period. In connection with the possibility, as A-P state, that 'an archaeologist-amateur ... dug in the finds in the earth.' aiming to 'produce confusion in Serbian archaeology' I cite here what this 'archaeologist-amateur' needed to know to do this. He needed to shape artistically 93 objects of four typically Neolithic materials, stone, flint, bone and pottery (16 pottery, 66 stone, 11 bone objects) and to dig them in clandestinely, together with some protostarcevo pottery. He would need to find various types of stone which are not found in the region, such as serpentine and albite, and to make several dozen objects from them; to find animal bones (Bos/Cervus), from the protostarcevo period and make a large number of figurines exclusively of this material; then using baked clay (as A-P state), also from the protostarcevo period, make anthropomorphic figurines. He would then have to put all these objects into a pit which he dug out in the centre of the Neolithic site, surrounded by a trench 75 m in diameter and then cover it with a great quantity of ochre. To fill up the pit clay of specific content would have to be transport from somewhere else. He would also need to have excellent knowledge of the religious symbols of Neolith, (particularly the connection of the symbolism of woman and moon, as well as the symbolism of moon, woman, snake etc.), to shape such objects which stylistically, typologically, chronologically and symbolically completely correspond with the cultural tradition of the Stone Age of Europe, Asia Minor, Near and Middle East, including the ambivalent figures (which represent at the same time man and woman, i.e. male and female symbols, otherwise a recent term in archaeology) and to know how the vulva looks immediately before birth which was depicted on all figurines of woman in childbirth in Belica. The statement by A-P that 'there are no analogies' is not correct because numerous analogies are known in Serbia and other parts of the Balkan Peninsula as well as in Asia Minor, the Near and Middle East. As geomagnetic investigations confirm, the protostarcevo settlement in Belica, contrary to the opinion of A-P that it is 'a small Neolithic settlement', is one of the largest settlements from the Early Neolith in Serbia, covering an area of more than 7 ha. Also the statement, that parallel traces, such as those which exist on the surface and in grooves on the stone objects, are the remains of work with 'contemporary grind tools with a large number of rotations' is incorrect. The expertise of professional archeometrologists using a 3D electron microscope in the Institute for geology in Heidelberg and an experiment by conservators from the University in T?bingen confirm that the finish of the outer surface and the finish of grooves on the objects of serpentine (expertise was carried out exactly on objects which A-P explicitly marked as examples of mechanical finish) was done with typical Neolithic techniques. The statement that I was the only one who wrote about the Belica finds and identified them as Neolithic, is also not true. Although it is not important in this discussion about the 'Neolithic originality' of the Belica find, the fact is that apart from me five other authors have written on this subject.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

McNeill, William H. "Neolithic battles." Nature 322, no. 6078 (July 1986): 416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/322416a0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Si-Ammour, S. "The Chronology of the Neolithic in Northwest Africa." Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki 164, no. 3 (2022): 228–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.228-242.

Full text
Abstract:
This article considers the chrono-cultural evolution in the Northwest Africa territories during the Neolithic period. A systematic chronology based on specialized literature on the chrono-cultural features of this period in the Sahara and the Maghreb was inferred. It covers the following three major Neolithic currents characteristic of the Neolithic period in Northwest Africa: the Saharan Sudanese Neolithic, the Neolithic of Capsian Tradition, and the Mediterranean Neolithic. These currents were studied using the data on cultural behaviors with some radiocarbon dates. The results obtained revealed the features of the evolution from the Neolithization process to the full establishment of the Neolithic economy of production, as well as, a possible continuity to a Final Neolithic phase that lasted longer in some regions despite other regions that transitioned to the Eneolithic and the Iron Age. It was concluded that the evolution path that determined the characteristics of the Early, Middle, Late, and Final Neolithic phases was almost the same in different territories of the northwestern part of the African continent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Nordqvist, Kerkko, and Teemu Mökkönen. "Periodisation of the Neolithic and radiocarbon chronology of the Early Neolithic and the beginning of the Middle Neolithic in Finland." Documenta Praehistorica 44 (January 3, 2018): 78–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/dp.44.5.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper discusses the basis of Neolithic periodization used in mainland Finland. It is suggested that the periodization should be revised: boundary between the Middle and Late Neolithic periods should be moved to correspond the appearance of Corded Ware (ca. 2800 calBC), and a term Final Neolithic introduced to cover the final centuries of the Neolithic. This kind of division would reflect changes in the cultural development better than the currently used one. In addition, the chronological frames for the pottery types dated between the late 6th and mid-4th millennium calBC, i.e. the Early Neolithic and the beginning of Middle Neolithic, are presented.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Neolithic"

1

Spicer, Nigel Christopher. "Reframing the Neolithic." Thesis, University of Bradford, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/13481.

Full text
Abstract:
In advancing a critical examination of post-processualism, the thesis has – as its central aim – the repositioning of the Neolithic within contemporary archaeological theory. Whilst acknowledging the insights it brings to an understanding of the period, it is argued that the knowledge it produces is necessarily constrained by the emphasis it accords to the cultural. Thus, in terms of the transition, the symbolic reading of agriculture to construct a metanarrative of Mesolithic continuity is challenged through a consideration of the evidential base and the indications it gives for a corresponding movement at the level of the economy; whilst the limiting effects generated by an interpretative reading of its monuments for an understanding of the social are considered. Underpinning these constraints is the conceptual privileging of the individual consequent upon the post-processual reaction to the totalising frameworks of modernist knowledge and the metanarratives of progress they construct – as exemplified in the economic reading of Childe. In examining the form of this reaction, the wider post-processual transposition of postmodernism within contemporary archaeological theory is also considered. In utilising Giddens’ concept of reflexivity, it is argued that rather than the ‘cultural turn’ itself, it is the inflection of the epistemological frameworks of the Enlightenment with a teleological reading of the past as progress that represents the postmodern within contemporary archaeological theory and it is through this understanding of postmodernism as expressing the capacity that modernity has to be self-aware that the conditions are established for the recovery of the Neolithic as a holistic object.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Coolidge, J. W. "Southern Turkmenistan in the Neolithic a petrographic case study /." Oxford : Archaeopress, 2005. http://books.google.com/books?id=BjVmAAAAMAAJ.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Wiriyaromp, Warrachai, and n/a. "The neolithic period in Thailand." University of Otago. Department of Anthropology, 2008. http://adt.otago.ac.nz./public/adt-NZDU20080904.111233.

Full text
Abstract:
There are two principal models that purport to interpret the evidence for the origins of the Neolithic period in Thailand. Both stress the importance of rice cultivation and the domestication of a range of animals. One incorporates archaeological and linguistic evidence in identifying the origins as the result of the diffusion of farming communities into Southeast Asia and India from a source in the Yangtze River valley. The alternative stresses a local evolutionary pathway whereby indigenous hunter-gatherers began to cultivate rice within Thailand. This dissertation is centred on the results of the excavation of Ban Non Wat, in the Upper Mun Valley of Northeast Thailand. This has provided one of the largest, best dated and provenanced samples of occupation and mortuary remains of a Neolithic community so far available in Southeast Asia. Its principal objective is to define the motifs incised, impressed and painted onto the surface of ceramic mortuary vessels, in order to permit a comparison with other assemblages first in Thailand, then in Southeast Asia north into China. It is held that if there are close parallels over a wide geographic area, in these motifs, then it would support a model of diffusion. If there are not, then the alternative of local origins would need to be examined closely. It is argued that the similarity in motifs, particularly a stylised human figure, between Thai and Vietnamese sites lends support to a common origin for these groups. The motifs are not so obvious when examining the southern Chinese data, although the mode of decoration by painting, incising and impressing recur there. This, in conjunction with mortuary rituals, weaving technology, the domestic dog, and the linguistic evidence, sustains a model for demic diffusion. However, the presence of ceramic vessels also decorated with impressed/incised techniques in maritime hunter-gatherer contexts stresses that the actual Neolithic settlement may have been more complex.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Nishiaki, Yoshihiro. "Lithic technology of Neolithic Syria /." Oxford : Archaeopress, 2000. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb37198619c.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Karsten, Per. "Att kasta yxan i sjön en studie över rituell tradition och förändring utifrån skånska neolitiska offerfynd /." Stockholm : Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1994. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/31654751.html.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Squair, Robert Hay. "The neolithic of the Western Isles." Thesis, University of Glasgow, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.285026.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cleal, R. M. J. "The Later Neolithic in Eastern England." Thesis, University of Reading, 1985. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.370644.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Nelis, E. L. "Lithics of the Northern Irish Neolithic." Thesis, Queen's University Belfast, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.403150.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Patton, Mark. "Neolithic communities of the Channel Islands /." Oxford : Tempus reparatum, 1995. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb369589366.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Svanlund, Simon. "Stridsyxekulturens bebyggelsemönster : En undersökning av samtida utgrävningar i Skåne och hur ett bebyggelsemönster avspeglar sin kultur." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för kulturvetenskaper (KV), 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-39846.

Full text
Abstract:
The goal with this work is to study the settlement during the Middle Neolithic B. Looking at the settlement pattern of the Battle Axe C culture (BAC) in Scania we might be able to get a picture of how the social structure of the BAC looked like and how it differed from' earlier and later culture groups.. What can a change in settlement tell archaeologists today about this and what problems do archeologist have to take into consideration.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Neolithic"

1

Reddy, V. Rami. Neolithic and post-Neolithic cultures. New Delhi, India: Mittal Publications, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Neolithic. London: Routledge, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

American neolithic. Chattanooga, TN]: C&R Press, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Neolithic Attica. Athens: Archeological Society at Athens, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Peter, Topping, and Neolithic Studies Group, eds. Neolithic landscapes. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Neolithic Britain. Princes Risborough: Shire Publications, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Harkin, Elizabeth. Neolithic farmers. (Belfast): Stranmillis College History Department/Learning Resources Unit in association with the Ulster History Park, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Doron, Dag, and Mayer Daniella Bar-Yosef, eds. Neolithic Ashkelon. Jerusalem: Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Vitelli, Karen D. Franchthi Neolithic pottery. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Neolithic"

1

Banning, Edward. "Aceramic Neolithic." In Encyclopedia of Prehistory, 1–20. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0023-0_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Vikrama, Bhuvan, and Umesh Chattopadhyaya. "Ganges Neolithic." In Encyclopedia of Prehistory, 127–32. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0023-0_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kenoyer, Jonathan Mark. "Indus Neolithic." In Encyclopedia of Prehistory, 151–55. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0023-0_17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Peasnall, Brian L. "Iranian Neolithic." In Encyclopedia of Prehistory, 215–35. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0023-0_22.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Banning, Edward. "Ceramic Neolithic." In Encyclopedia of Prehistory, 40–55. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0023-0_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Sadowski, Ryszard F. "Neolithic Revolution." In Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics, 1–8. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_540-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Sadowski, Ryszard F. "Neolithic Revolution." In Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics, 1880–87. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_540.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Arbestain, M. Camps, F. Macías, W. Chesworth, and Ward Chesworth. "Neolithic Revolution." In Encyclopedia of Soil Science, 488–89. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3995-9_377.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Prescott, Christopher. "Scandinavian Neolithic." In Encyclopedia of Prehistory, 318–23. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1187-8_25.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kiguradze, Tamaz. "Caucasian Neolithic." In Encyclopedia of Prehistory, 55–76. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1187-8_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Neolithic"

1

Vybornov, A., E. Kolpakov, and E. Tkach. "Neolithic Dwellings." In Neolithic Dwellings. Institute for the History of Material Culture of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-907298-18-1.

Full text
Abstract:
Collection of works of the International Symposium “Neolithic Dwellings” includes the works of the participants of the symposium held on May 17–18, 2021, in Saint-Petersburg, at the Institute for the History of Material Culture RAS. Reports cover the different questions, connected with identification and interpretation of the dwelling constructions during Mesolithic and Neolithic. Geographically, the studies presented in the collection comprise an expensive territory 3⁄4 from Baltic Coast to Kamchatka. The book is designed for a wide range of researchers in the humanities (archaeologists, historians, ethnographers) and experts in allied subjects, humanities degree students, and all readers interested in humanitarian knowledge in general.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Stavitsky, Vladimir. "NEOLITHIC CULTURE CONCEPT`S CONTENT." In Evolution of Neolithic cultures of Eastern Europe. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-189-4-2019-87-89.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Manko, Valeriy. "Land use system in the Neolithic." In SUBSISTENCE STRATEGIES IN THE STONE AGE, DIRECT AND INDIRECT EVIDENCE OF FISHING AND GATHERING. Institute for the History of Material Culture Russian Academy of Science, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-907053-00-7-2018-69-71.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Akhundov, Tufan. "The Neolithic of the Southern Caucasus." In Antiquities of East Europe, South Asia and South Siberia in the context of connections and interactions within the Eurasian cultural space (new data and concepts). Institute for the History of Material Culture Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-907053-34-2-97-100.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mosin, Vadim. "NEOLITHIC CULTURES OF TRANSURALS: SOCIOCULTURAL CONTENT." In Evolution of Neolithic cultures of Eastern Europe. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-189-4-2019-66-67.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Tsetlin, Yuri. "THE EARLY NEOLITHIC «VOLGA-OKA» CULTURE REVISITED." In Evolution of Neolithic cultures of Eastern Europe. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-189-4-2019-102-103.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Dubovtseva, Ekaterina, Lubov Kosinskaya, and Henny Piezonka. "Early Neolithic site of Amnya I – revision." In Evolution of Neolithic cultures of Eastern Europe. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-189-4-2019-30-32.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Andreev, K., A. Vybornov, A. Kudashov, and M. Kulkova. "ХРОНОЛОГИЯ НЕОЛИТА МАРИЙСКОГО ПОВОЛЖЬЯ." In Радиоуглерод в археологии и палеоэкологии: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Материалы международной конференции, посвященной 80-летию старшего научного сотрудника ИИМК РАН, кандидата химических наук Ганны Ивановны Зайцевой. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-213-6-9-10.

Full text
Abstract:
During the Neolithic period, several ceramic traditions were developed on the territory of the middle Volga forest: unornamented, pin-pointed, combed, and pit-combed. The problem of their chronological correlation is very relevant at this stage of study. Currently, 29 radiocarbon dates have been obtained from Neolithic materials from 10 sites in the region. The presented work is devoted to their analysis. The Neolithization of the Mari Volga region is associated with the emergence of carriers of the tradition of making unornamented ware at the turn of the 7th-6th millennium BC. Starting from the middle of the 6th millennium BC. In the region, the tradition of ornamentation of ceramics with pin-pointed is spreading, which coexists with non-decorated dishes. With the beginning of the 5th millennium BC. the penetration of representatives of the Kama culture and pit-comb ceramics into the forest Middle Volga region may be related. Also radiocarbon dates allow confirming the coexistence at the beginning of the 5th millennium BC. in the region of all the ceramic traditions presented in the Neolithic period. At the same time, the time of extinction of the indicated Neolithic ceramic traditions is associated with the middle – third quarter of the 5th millennium BC.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Tsvetkova, N. "РАДИОУГЛЕРОДНАЯ ХРОНОЛОГИЯ РАННЕГО НЕОЛИТА ВЕРХНЕВОЛЖСКОГО РАЙОНА." In Радиоуглерод в археологии и палеоэкологии: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Материалы международной конференции, посвященной 80-летию старшего научного сотрудника ИИМК РАН, кандидата химических наук Ганны Ивановны Зайцевой. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-213-6-107-108.

Full text
Abstract:
The Early Neolithic in the Upper Volga region is being characterized by coexistence of the Volga-Oka and the Upper Volga cultures. The first is dated from 7100 to 6400 Uncal BC (6200–5400 Саl BC) and it can be treated as the primal neolithisation episode. The existing of the evolved-Early Neolithic presented by the Upper Volga culture is determined by the interval 6600 –5900 Uncal BC (6065 – 4800 Саl BC).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Stavitskiy, Vladimir. "THE CONCEPT OF «VESTIGIAL NEOLITHIC» OF A.T. SINUK." In Evolution of Neolithic cultures of Eastern Europe. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-189-4-2019-86-87.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Neolithic"

1

Brophy, Kenny, and Alison Sheridan, eds. Neolithic Scotland: ScARF Panel Report. Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, June 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.9750/scarf.06.2012.196.

Full text
Abstract:
The main recommendations of the Panel report can be summarised as follows: The Overall Picture: more needs to be understood about the process of acculturation of indigenous communities; about the Atlantic, Breton strand of Neolithisation; about the ‘how and why’ of the spread of Grooved Ware use and its associated practices and traditions; and about reactions to Continental Beaker novelties which appeared from the 25th century. The Detailed Picture: Our understanding of developments in different parts of Scotland is very uneven, with Shetland and the north-west mainland being in particular need of targeted research. Also, here and elsewhere in Scotland, the chronology of developments needs to be clarified, especially as regards developments in the Hebrides. Lifeways and Lifestyles: Research needs to be directed towards filling the substantial gaps in our understanding of: i) subsistence strategies; ii) landscape use (including issues of population size and distribution); iii) environmental change and its consequences – and in particular issues of sea level rise, peat formation and woodland regeneration; and iv) the nature and organisation of the places where people lived; and to track changes over time in all of these. Material Culture and Use of Resources: In addition to fine-tuning our characterisation of material culture and resource use (and its changes over the course of the Neolithic), we need to apply a wider range of analytical approaches in order to discover more about manufacture and use.Some basic questions still need to be addressed (e.g. the chronology of felsite use in Shetland; what kind of pottery was in use, c 3000–2500, in areas where Grooved Ware was not used, etc.) and are outlined in the relevant section of the document. Our knowledge of organic artefacts is very limited, so research in waterlogged contexts is desirable. Identity, Society, Belief Systems: Basic questions about the organisation of society need to be addressed: are we dealing with communities that started out as egalitarian, but (in some regions) became socially differentiated? Can we identify acculturated indigenous people? How much mobility, and what kind of mobility, was there at different times during the Neolithic? And our chronology of certain monument types and key sites (including the Ring of Brodgar, despite its recent excavation) requires to be clarified, especially since we now know that certain types of monument (including Clava cairns) were not built during the Neolithic. The way in which certain types of site (e.g. large palisaded enclosures) were used remains to be clarified. Research and methodological issues: There is still much ignorance of the results of past and current research, so more effective means of dissemination are required. Basic inventory information (e.g. the Scottish Human Remains Database) needs to be compiled, and Canmore and museum database information needs to be updated and expanded – and, where not already available online, placed online, preferably with a Scottish Neolithic e-hub that directs the enquirer to all the available sources of information. The Historic Scotland on-line radiocarbon date inventory needs to be resurrected and kept up to date. Under-used resources, including the rich aerial photography archive in the NMRS, need to have their potential fully exploited. Multi-disciplinary, collaborative research (and the application of GIS modelling to spatial data in order to process the results) is vital if we are to escape from the current ‘silo’ approach and address key research questions from a range of perspectives; and awareness of relevant research outside Scotland is essential if we are to avoid reinventing the wheel. Our perspective needs to encompass multi-scale approaches, so that ScARF Neolithic Panel Report iv developments within Scotland can be understood at a local, regional and wider level. Most importantly, the right questions need to be framed, and the right research strategies need to be developed, in order to extract the maximum amount of information about the Scottish Neolithic.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Austin Hill, Austin Hill. Archaeology & Drones: Mapping Neolithic Structures in the Black Desert, Jordan. Experiment, November 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.18258/6274.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Moreva, O. L. LATE NEOLITHIC POTTERY OF THE SETTLEMENT CHEREPAKHA-13 IN THE SOUTHERN PRIMORIYE. "Росток", 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/mor-2018-26.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Berdnikov, I. M., and N. B. N.B. Sokolova. CORD-IMPRESSED CERAMICS IN THE NEOLITHIC OF BAYKAL-YENISEI SIBERIA: CHARACTERISTIC AND CHRONOMETRY*. "Росток", 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/ber-2018-03.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Franck, Raphaël, Oded Galor, Omer Moav, and Ömer Özak. The Shadow of the Neolithic Revolution on Life Expectancy: A Double-Edged Sword. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w30221.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Gabrilchuk, M. A. A NEW SITE BIDJAN-4 OF THE MIDDLE NEOLITHIC PERIOD IN THE JEWISH AUTONOMOUS REGION. "Росток", 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/gab-2018-08.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Andonova, Mila, Kamen Boyadzhiev, and Yavor Boyadzhiev. The Archaeobotany of Late Neolithic-Early Chalcolithic Varbishki Dol (Bata, Panagуurishte Municipality, Western Bulgaria): Results from the Rescue Trail Trenching Campaign. "Prof. Marin Drinov" Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, February 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2021.02.11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Horejs, Barbara, and Ulrike Schuh, eds. PREHISTORY & WEST ASIAN/NORTHEAST AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY 2021–2023. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, December 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1553/oeai.pwana2021-2023.

Full text
Abstract:
The long-established research of Prehistory and West Asian/Northeast African archaeology (the former Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology, OREA) at the Austrian Academy of Sciences was transformed into a department of the »new« Austrian Archaeological Institute (OeAI) at the Austrian Academy of Sciences in 2021. This merging of several institutes into the new OeAI offers a wide range of new opportunities for basic and interdisciplinary research, which support the traditional research focus as well as the development of new projects in world archaeology. The research areas of the Department of Prehistory and West Asian/Northeast African Archaeology include Quaternary archaeology, Prehistory, Near Eastern archaeology and Egyptology. The groups cover an essential cultural area of prehistoric and early historical developments in Europe, Northeast Africa and West Asia. Prehistory is embedded in the world archaeology concept without geographical borders, including projects beyond this core zone, as well as a scientific and interdisciplinary approach. The focus lies in the time horizon from the Pleistocene about 2.6 million years ago to the transformation of societies into historical epochs in the 1st millennium BC. The chronological expertise of the groups covers the periods Palaeolithic, Neolithic, Chalcolithic, Bronze Age and Early Iron Age. The archaeology of West Asia and Northeast Africa is linked to the Mediterranean and Europe, which enables large-scale and chronologically broad basic research on human history. The department consists of the following seven groups: »Quaternary Archaeology«, »Prehistoric Phenomena«, »Prehistoric Identities«, »Archaeology in Egypt and Sudan«, »Archaeology of the Levant«, »Mediterranean Economies« and »Urnfield Culture Networks«. The groups conduct fieldwork and material analyses in Austria, Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova, Greece, Cyprus, Türkiye, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Sudan and South Africa.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography