Academic literature on the topic 'New shorter Oxford English dictionary on historical principles'

A different name than English literature, ‘Anglo-Indian Literature’, was given to the body of literature in English that emerged on account of the British interaction with India unlike the case with their interaction with America or Australia or New Zealand. Even the Indians’ contributions (translations as well as creative pieces in English) were classed under the caption ‘Anglo-Indian’ initially but later a different name, ‘Indo-Anglian’, was conceived for the growing variety and volume of writings in English by the Indians. However, unlike the former the latter has not found a favour with the compilers of English dictionaries. With the passage of time the fine line of demarcation drawn on the basis of subject matter and author’s point of view has disappeared and currently even Anglo-Indians’ writings are classed as ‘Indo-Anglian’. Besides contemplating on various connotations of the term ‘Indo-Anglian’ the article discusses the related issues such as: the etymology of the term, fixing the name of its coiner and the date of its first use. In contrast to the opinions of the historians and critics like K R S Iyengar, G P Sarma, M K Naik, Daniela Rogobete, Sachidananda Mohanty, Dilip Chatterjee and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak it has been brought to light that the term ‘Indo-Anglian’ was first used in 1880 by James Payn to refer to the Indians’ writings in English rather pejoratively. However, Iyengar used it in a positive sense though he himself gave it up soon. The reasons for the wide acceptance of the term, sometimes also for the authors of the sub-continent, by the members of academia all over the world, despite its rejection by Sahitya Akademi (the national body of letters in India), have also been contemplated on. References Alphonso-Karkala, John B. (1970). Indo-English Literature in the Nineteenth Century, Mysore: Literary Half-yearly, University of Mysore, University of Mysore Press. Amanuddin, Syed. (2016 [1990]). “Don’t Call Me Indo-Anglian”. C. D. Narasimhaiah (Ed.), An Anthology of Commonwealth Poetry. Bengaluru: Trinity Press. B A (Compiler). (1883). Indo-Anglian Literature. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co. PDF. Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=rByZ2RcSBTMC&pg=PA1&source= gbs_selected_pages&cad=3#v=onepage&q&f=false ---. (1887). “Indo-Anglian Literature”. 2nd Issue. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co. PDF. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/60238178 Basham, A L. (1981[1954]). The Wonder That Was India: A Survey of the History and Culture of the Indian Sub-Continent before the Coming of the Muslims. Indian Rpt, Calcutta: Rupa. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/TheWonderThatWasIndiaByALBasham Bhushan, V N. (1945). The Peacock Lute. Bomaby: Padma Publications Ltd. Bhushan, V N. (1945). The Moving Finger. Bomaby: Padma Publications Ltd. Boria, Cavellay. (1807). “Account of the Jains, Collected from a Priest of this Sect; at Mudgeri: Translated by Cavelly Boria, Brahmen; for Major C. Mackenzie”. Asiatick Researches: Or Transactions of the Society; Instituted In Bengal, For Enquiring Into The History And Antiquities, the Arts, Sciences, and Literature, of Asia, 9, 244-286. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.104510 Chamber’s Twentieth Century Dictionary [The]. (1971). Bombay et al: Allied Publishers. Print. Chatterjee, Dilip Kumar. (1989). Cousins and Sri Aurobindo: A Study in Literary Influence, Journal of South Asian Literature, 24(1), 114-123. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/40873985. Chattopadhyay, Dilip Kumar. (1988). A Study of the Works of James Henry Cousins (1873-1956) in the Light of the Theosophical Movement in India and the West. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Burdwan: The University of Burdwan. PDF. Retrieved from: http://ir.inflibnet. ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/10603/68500/9/09_chapter%205.pdf. Cobuild English Language Dictionary. (1989 [1987]). rpt. London and Glasgow. Collins Cobuild Advanced Illustrated Dictionary. (2010). rpt. Glasgow: Harper Collins. Print. Concise Oxford English Dictionary [The]. (1961 [1951]). H. W. Fowler and F. G. Fowler. (Eds.) Oxford: Clarendon Press. 4th ed. Cousins, James H. (1921). Modern English Poetry: Its Characteristics and Tendencies. Madras: Ganesh & Co. n. d., Preface is dated April, 1921. PDF. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/ 2027/uc1.$b683874 ---. (1919) New Ways in English Literature. Madras: Ganesh & Co. 2nd edition. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.31747 ---. (1918). The Renaissance in India. Madras: Madras: Ganesh & Co., n. d., Preface is dated June 1918. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.203914 Das, Sisir Kumar. (1991). History of Indian Literature. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi. Encarta World English Dictionary. (1999). London: Bloomsbury. Gandhi, M K. (1938 [1909]). Hind Swaraj Tr. M K Gandhi. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House. PDF. Retrieved from: www.mkgandhi.org/ebks/hind_swaraj.pdf. Gokak, V K. (n.d.). English in India: Its Present and Future. Bombay et al: Asia Publishing House. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.460832 Goodwin, Gwendoline (Ed.). (1927). Anthology of Modern Indian Poetry, London: John Murray. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.176578 Guptara, Prabhu S. (1986). Review of Indian Literature in English, 1827-1979: A Guide to Information Sources. The Yearbook of English Studies, 16 (1986): 311–13. PDF. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3507834 Iyengar, K R Srinivasa. (1945). Indian Contribution to English Literature [The]. Bombay: Karnatak Publishing House. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/ indiancontributi030041mbp ---. (2013 [1962]). Indian Writing in English. New Delhi: Sterling. ---. (1943). Indo-Anglian Literature. Bombay: PEN & International Book House. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/IndoAnglianLiterature Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (2003). Essex: Pearson. Lyall, Alfred Comyn. (1915). The Anglo-Indian Novelist. Studies in Literature and History. London: John Murray. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet. dli.2015.94619 Macaulay T. B. (1835). Minute on Indian Education dated the 2nd February 1835. HTML. Retrieved from: http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00generallinks/macaulay/ txt_minute_education_1835.html Mehrotra, Arvind Krishna. (2003). An Illustrated History of Indian Literature in English. Delhi: Permanent Black. ---. (2003[1992]). The Oxford India Anthology of Twelve Modern Indian Poets. New Delhi: Oxford U P. Minocherhomji, Roshan Nadirsha. (1945). Indian Writers of Fiction in English. Bombay: U of Bombay. Modak, Cyril (Editor). (1938). The Indian Gateway to Poetry (Poetry in English), Calcutta: Longmans, Green. PDF. Retrieved from http://en.booksee.org/book/2266726 Mohanty, Sachidananda. (2013). “An ‘Indo-Anglian’ Legacy”. The Hindu. July 20, 2013. Web. Retrieved from: http://www.thehindu.com/features/magazine/an-indoanglian-legacy/article 4927193.ece Mukherjee, Sujit. (1968). Indo-English Literature: An Essay in Definition, Critical Essays on Indian Writing in English. Eds. M. K. Naik, G. S. Amur and S. K. Desai. Dharwad: Karnatak University. Naik, M K. (1989 [1982]). A History of Indian English Literature. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, rpt.New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles [The], (1993). Ed. Lesley Brown, Vol. 1, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Naik, M K. (1989 [1982]). A History of Indian English Literature. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, rpt. Oaten, Edward Farley. (1953 [1916]). Anglo-Indian Literature. In: Cambridge History of English Literature, Vol. 14, (pp. 331-342). A C Award and A R Waller, (Eds). Rpt. ---. (1908). A Sketch of Anglo-Indian Literature, London: Kegan Paul. PDF. Retrieved from: https://ia600303.us.archive.org/0/items/sketchofangloind00oateuoft/sketchofangloind00oateuoft.pdf) Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. (1979 [1974]). A. S. Hornby (Ed). : Oxford UP, 3rd ed. Oxford English Dictionary [The]. Vol. 7. (1991[1989]). J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner, (Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed. Pai, Sajith. (2018). Indo-Anglians: The newest and fastest-growing caste in India. Web. Retrieved from: https://scroll.in/magazine/867130/indo-anglians-the-newest-and-fastest-growing-caste-in-india Pandia, Mahendra Navansuklal. (1950). The Indo-Anglian Novels as a Social Document. Bombay: U Press. Payn, James. (1880). An Indo-Anglian Poet, The Gentleman’s Magazine, 246(1791):370-375. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/stream/gentlemansmagaz11unkngoog#page/ n382/mode/2up. ---. (1880). An Indo-Anglian Poet, Littell’s Living Age (1844-1896), 145(1868): 49-52. PDF. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/stream/livingage18projgoog/livingage18projgoog_ djvu.txt. Rai, Saritha. (2012). India’s New ‘English Only’ Generation. Retrieved from: https://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/01/indias-new-english-only-generation/ Raizada, Harish. (1978). The Lotus and the Rose: Indian Fiction in English (1850-1947). Aligarh: The Arts Faculty. Rajan, P K. (2006). Indian English literature: Changing traditions. Littcrit. 32(1-2), 11-23. Rao, Raja. (2005 [1938]). Kanthapura. New Delhi: Oxford UP. Rogobete, Daniela. (2015). Global versus Glocal Dimensions of the Post-1981 Indian English Novel. Portal Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 12(1). Retrieved from: http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/4378/4589. Rushdie, Salman & Elizabeth West. (Eds.) (1997). The Vintage Book of Indian Writing 1947 – 1997. London: Vintage. Sampson, George. (1959 [1941]). Concise Cambridge History of English Literature [The]. Cambridge: UP. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.18336. Sarma, Gobinda Prasad. (1990). Nationalism in Indo-Anglian Fiction. New Delhi: Sterling. Singh, Kh. Kunjo. (2002). The Fiction of Bhabani Bhattacharya. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. (2012). How to Read a ‘Culturally Different’ Book. An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Sturgeon, Mary C. (1916). Studies of Contemporary Poets, London: George G Hard & Co., Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.95728. Thomson, W S (Ed). (1876). Anglo-Indian Prize Poems, Native and English Writers, In: Commemoration of the Visit of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales to India. London: Hamilton, Adams & Co., Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/ books?id=QrwOAAAAQAAJ Wadia, A R. (1954). The Future of English. Bombay: Asia Publishing House. Wadia, B J. (1945). Foreword to K R Srinivasa Iyengar’s The Indian Contribution to English Literature. Bombay: Karnatak Publishing House. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/ details/indiancontributi030041mbp Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. (1989). New York: Portland House. Yule, H. and A C Burnell. (1903). Hobson-Jobson: A Glossary of Colloquial Anglo-Indian Words and Phrases, and of Kindred Terms, Etymological, Historical, Geographical and Discursive. W. Crooke, Ed. London: J. Murray. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/ details/hobsonjobsonagl00croogoog Sources www.amazon.com/Indo-Anglian-Literature-Edward-Charles-Buck/dp/1358184496 www.archive.org/stream/livingage18projgoog/livingage18projgoog_djvu.txt www.catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001903204?type%5B%5D=all&lookfor%5B%5D=indo%20anglian&ft= www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B.L._Indo_Anglian_Public_School,_Aurangabad www.everyculture.com/South-Asia/Anglo-Indian.html www.solo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?fn=search&ct=search&initialSearch=true&mode=Basic&tab=local&indx=1&dum=true&srt=rank&vid=OXVU1&frbg=&tb=t&vl%28freeText0%29=Indo-Anglian+Literature+&scp.scps=scope%3A%28OX%29&vl% 28516065169UI1%29=all_items&vl%281UIStartWith0%29=contains&vl%28254947567UI0%29=any&vl%28254947567UI0%29=title&vl%28254947567UI0%29=any www.worldcat.org/title/indo-anglian-literature/oclc/30452040

The Canary Islands (Spain) have always been in close contact with the Anglo-Saxon world, which has had important consequences for the economy but has also meant a significant influence at the socio-cultural, linguistic and literary levels. A review of the English bibliography on the Canaries reveals, among other aspects, a tendency in most authors to use Hispanicisms and Canarianisms in their texts. This article offers a record of the Spanish and Canarian words which appear in a corpus of fourteen works taken from an extensive bibliography, namely twelve travel books and two tourist guides published between 1851 and 1917. Besides providing an overview of the studies on Hispanicisms in English, this paper’s main aim is to highlight the contribution of Canarian Spanish to the enrichment of the vocabulary of the English language by checking which of the Hispanicisms in our corpus which are actually Canarianisms have been included in the lexical repertoire of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (2007).

У статті проаналізовано експресивно марковані контексти з інверсією та їх роль у творенні образно-стилістичної канви англійського художнього тексту, шляхи їх адекватного відтворення цільовою мовою та збереження індивідуально-авторських рис художнього стилю О. Гаслі. Інверсія як граматично-стилістична категорія є вагомим засобом, який використовують задля досягнення належного естетичного ефекту. У поєднанні з іншими засобами різних мовних рівнів, а також через використання інших тропів інверсивне зміщення виконує ряд функцій у тексті оригіналу: (а) наголошення семантично й концептуально значущих і часто стилістично маркованих компонентів висловлювання. У певних контекстах ці елементи створюють ефект антитези; (б) емфаза певного елементу речення, що «консолідує» наративну структуру наведеного уривку, сприяє змістовому розкриттю та емоційно-оцінній характеристиці персонажів; (в) подання художньої деталі; (г) передання динамічності дії, яка вказує і на емоційне напруження героя твору, і на складний характер зображуваної у контексті ситуації; (д) засіб передання настрою та афективного стану персонажа. Емотивний колорит перекладного дискурсу твориться завдяки збереженню у його структурі експресивно маркованих засобів різних мовних рівнів, а також завдяки розкриттю асоціативної конотації мовних одиниць, що у поєднанні творять образну канву цільового тексту. Література References Анджапаридзе Г. (1976) Предисловие. Huxley A. Crome Yellow: A Novel – M.: ProgressPublishers. С. 3–32.Andzhaparidze, G. (1976) Predisloviye [Preface] // Huxley A. Crome Yellow. Moscow:Progress Publishers, 3–32. Болотнова Н. (2009) Коммуникативная стилистика текста: словарь-тезаурус. – М. :Флинта; Наука.Bolotnova, N. (2009) Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: slovar’-tezaurus [CommunicativeStylistics of text]. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka. Бредбері М. (2011) Британський роман нового часу / Переклад з англ. В. Дмитрука. –К.: Ксенія Сладкевич.Brudbery, M. (2012) Brytans’kyi roman novoho chasu [The Modern British Novel]. transl. byVictor Dmytruk. Kyiv: Kseniya Sladkevych. Гальперин И. (1976) О принципах семантического анализа стилистическимаркированных отрезков текста. В кн. Принципы и методы семантическихисследований. – М.: Наука (Сс. 284–289).Galperin, I. (1976) O printsipakh semanticheskogo analiza stilisticheski markirovannykhotrezkov teksta [On principles of Semantic Analysis of Stylistically Marked Parts of Text] In:Pritsipy i Metody Semanticheskikh Issledovanii. (pp. 284–289). Moscow: Nauka. Ilek B. (1970) On Translating Images. In: The Nature of Translation. Essays on Theory andPractice of Literary Translation (pp. 135–138). J. C. Holmes. (ed.). Bratislava: PublishingHouse of Slovak Academy of Sciences. Засєкін С. Психолінгвістичні універсалії перекладу художнього тексту. – Луцьк: Волин.нац. ун-т ім. Лесі Українки, 2012.Zasiekin, S. (2012) Psykholingvistychni Universalii Perekladu Khudozhnyoho Textu[Psycholinguistic Universals in the Translation of Literary Text]. Lutsk: Volyn NationalUniversity. Кухаренко В. Інтерпретація тексту. – Вінниця: Нова книга, 2004.Kukharenko, V. (2004) Interpretatsiya tekstu [Interpretation of Text]. Vinnytsya: NovaKnyha. Leech, G., Short, M. (2007) Style in Fiction. A Linguistic Introduction to English FictionalProse. L.& N.Y.: Longman Pearson. Lyons, J. (1995) Linguistic Semantics An Introduction. NY: Cambridge University Press. Норман Б. Когнитивный синтаксис русского языка. – М.: ФЛИНТА, 2013.Norman, B. (2013) Kognitivnyi sintaksis russkogo yazyka [Cognitive Syntax of Russianlanguage]. Moscow: Flinta. Пелевина Н. Стилистический анализ художественного текста. – М.: Просвещение, 1980.Pelevina, N. (1980) Stilisticheskii analiz khudozhesvennogo teksta [Stylistic Analysis ofBelles-letters Text]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. Ревуцкий О. Анализ художественного текста как коммуникативно обусловленногосвязного целого. – Минск: НИО, 1998.Revutskiy, O. (1998) Analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta kak kommubikativno obuslovlennogosviaznogo tselogo [Analysis of Belles-lettres Text as a Communicatively Determined CoherentUnit]. Minsk: NIO. Сдобников В. Теория перевода. – М.: АСТ: Восток – Запад, 2007.Sdobnikov, V. (2007) Teoriya perevoda [Theory of Translation]. Moscow: AST Vostok –Zapad. Селіванова О. О. Методи дослідження тексту в сучасній лінгвістиці. В кн. СелівановаО.О. Світ свідомості в мові.– Черкаси: Ю. Чабаненко, 2012. – C. 327–346.Selivanova, O. (2012) Metody doslidzhennya tekstu v suchasnii lingvistytsi [Methods of TextAnalysis in Contemporary Linguistics]. In: Svit Svidomosti v Movi, O. Selivanova, (Ed.). (pp.327–346). Cherkasy: Yu. Chabanenko. Селіванова, О. O. Проблема моделювання перекладацького процесу // Світ свідомості вмові. – Черкаси: Ю. Чабаненко, 2012. – С. 445–454.Selivanova, O. (2012) Problema modeliuvannia perekladatskogo protsesu [Problem ofTranslation Process Modelling] In: Svit Svidomosti v Movi, O. Selivanova, (Ed.). (pp. 445–454). Cherkasy: Yu. Chabanenko. Селіванова О. Сучасна лінгвістика: напрями та проблеми. – Полтава: Довкілля-К, 2008.Selivanova O. (2008) Suchasna lingvistyka: napriamy ta perspektyvy [ContemporaryLinguistics: Trends and Prospects]. Poltava: Dovkillia-K. Сучасна українська літературна мова. Стилістика. /за заг. ред. І. К. Білодіда. – К. : Наук.думка, 1972.Suchasna Ukrains’ka Literaturna Mova. Stylistyka (1972) [Modern Ukrainian LiteraryLanguage. Stylistics] I. Bilodid. (Ed.). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. Sukhorolska S., Fedorenko O. (2006) Methods of Linguistic Research. Lviv: Lviv IvanFranko National University Publishing Center. СУМ: Словник української мови: В 11-ти т. – К.: Наук. думка, 1970–1980.SUM (1970–1980) Slovnyk Ukrains’koi Movy. Kyiv: Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. SOED (1975) The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles. C. T. Onions,(Ed). NY.: Oxford University Press. Sources Гакслі О. Жовтий Кром / Переклад з англ. В. Вишневого. – К.: Українськийписьменник, 2011.Huxley A. (2011) Zhovtyi Krom [Crome Yellow]. transl. by V. Vyshnevyi. Kyiv: UkrainskyiPys’mennyk. Huxley A. (1976) Crome Yellow. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

This chapter focuses on the making of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED). It considers the claim of language sciences historian Hans Aarsleff that the lexicography of the OED depends entirely on Liddell and Scott’s Greek-English Lexicon. The story of the relationship between Liddell and Scott and the OED, which was to be published as A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles (NED) and then came to be known from the 1890s onwards as the OED falls into three parts. The first concerns the place of Liddell and Scott in the thought of the founders of the NED/OED project in the late 1850s and early 1860s. The second concerns the Lexicon’s place in the thought and practice of the founding editor of the printed dictionary, James Murray, from the late 1870s onwards. The third concerns the relationship between editions of Liddell and Scott and of the OED in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.