Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Nicaragua v

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Nicaragua v'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 15 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Nicaragua v.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Nicaragua v"

1

Bederman, David J. "Border and Transborder Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Jurisdiction and Admissibiuty." American Journal of International Law 83, no. 2 (April 1989): 353–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2202749.

Full text

Abstract:

On July 28, 1986, the Republic of Nicaragua filed an application instituting proceedings against the Republic of Honduras in the International Court of Justice. Nicaragua alleged that Honduras had allowed armed bands, known as contras, to operate from its territory to the detriment of Nicaraguan sovereignty, that Honduran military forces had directly participated in attacks on Nicaragua and that the Government of Honduras had given material aid and logistical support to the rebels. Nicaragua requested that the Court declare the acts and omissions of Honduras to be violations of international law and order it to desist from all such activities and to make reparations to Nicaragua. Honduras objected to the jurisdiction of the Court and to the admissibility of the Application. The parties subsequently agreed that the Court should first decide these questions before proceeding to the merits. Relying on the Pact of Bogotá for its jurisdictional rationale, the Court unanimously held: that it had jurisdiction and that the Application could be entertained.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Riesenberg, David P. "The International Court of Justice: Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia)." International Legal Materials 52, no. 1 (February 2013): 1–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.52.1.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

In 2012, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) rendered its fourth judgment in Nicaragua v. Colombia. The case was first initiated by Nicaragua under the Bogotá Pact in 2001. The fourth judgment affirmed Colombia’s territorial sovereignty over a group of islands in the western Caribbean Sea and delimited a boundary between the two states’ zones of maritime jurisdiction. Even after eleven years of complicated proceedings, however, the parties’ conflicting claims are not yet completely resolved. The ICJ explicitly declined to address Nicaragua’s potential entitlement to the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from its coastal baselines, including the portion of Nicaragua’s ‘‘outer’’ continental shelf that allegedly overlaps with Colombia’s maritime entitlements. For the foreseeable future, this aspect of the controversy will likely remain unresolved. One week after the ICJ rendered its fourth judgment, Colombia withdrew from the Bogotá Pact and thereby terminated its consent to the ICJ’s jurisdiction.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Rowles, James P. "“Secret Wars,” Self-Defense and the Charter—A Reply to Professor Moore." American Journal of International Law 80, no. 3 (July 1986): 568–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2201774.

Full text

Abstract:

In a recent article entitled The Secret War in Central America and the Future of World Order, Professor John Norton Moore, a staunch defender of United States actions toward Nicaragua, sets forth a comprehensive array of factual assertions and legal arguments to support his conclusions that support by the United States of Nicaraguan counterrevolutionaries or “contras” and its own actions against Nicaragua are justified as collective self-defense under international law. He also presents arguments to support his conclusion that the International Court of Justice has so exceeded its authority in exercising jurisdiction in the case of Nicaragua v. United States that its decisions are void, and consequently may be ignored by the United States—or, for that matter, Nicaragua. Professor Moore’s analysis and conclusions differ sharply from those of the present writer. It should therefore be useful to identify the main points of disagreement, and to suggest the policy implications of the different legal arguments and conclusions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Briggs, Herbert W. "Nicaragua v. United States: Jurisdiction and Admissibility." American Journal of International Law 79, no. 2 (April 1985): 373–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2201707.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Kirgis, Frederic L. "Nicaragua v. United States as a Precedent." American Journal of International Law 79, no. 3 (July 1985): 652–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2201892.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Quicke, Donald L. J., Scott R. Shaw, Mian Inayatullah, and Buntika A. Butcher. "The genus Vipio Latreille (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) in the Neotropical Region." ZooKeys 925 (April 8, 2020): 89–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.925.48457.

Full text

Abstract:

The genus Vipio Latreille is revised for the Neotropical region (south of Nicaragua). All species are fully illustrated. Thirteen species are recognised of which five (V. boliviensis, V. carinatus, V. godoyi, V. hansoni, and V. lavignei) are described as new, all with descriptions attributable to Inayatullah, Shaw & Quicke. All previously described Neotropical species are redescribed. A key is included for the identification of the Vipio species known from the Americas south of Nicaragua, and all species are illustrated.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Yotova, Rumiana. "THE PRINCIPLES OF DUE DILIGENCE AND PREVENTION IN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW." Cambridge Law Journal 75, no. 3 (November 2016): 445–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197316000672.

Full text

Abstract:

ON 16 December 2015, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered its judgment in the joined cases of Certain Activities Carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica), ICJ Reports 2015. These are the latest in a line of cases raising key principles of international environmental law before the ICJ, following Pulp Mills (2010), Aerial Herbicide Spraying and Whaling in the Antarctic (2014).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Miles, Cameron A. "Certain Activities Carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)/Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along The San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) (I.C.J.)." International Legal Materials 55, no. 3 (June 2016): 417–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.55.3.0417.

Full text

Abstract:

December 16, 2015, saw the International Court of Justice (ICJ or the Court) render final judgment in the joined cases of Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) (Border Area) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica Along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) (Road). Together, these cases represented an opportunity for the Court to advance and clarify its thinking on the role of environmental impact assessments (EIA) in general international law, as first introduced in its decision in Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) (Pulp Mills), with both Costa Rica (in Border Area) and Nicaragua (in Road) alleging that the other had failed to carry out an EIA with respect to certain, potentially environmentally harmful, activities. They also raised some interesting questions regarding remedies for the breach of provisional measures awarded under Article 41 of the ICJ Statute.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Leigh, Monroe. "Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America)." American Journal of International Law 81, no. 1 (January 1987): 206–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2202153.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Rudall, Jason. "Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)." American Journal of International Law 112, no. 2 (April 2018): 288–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.29.

Full text

Abstract:

Should trees have standing? The decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ or Court) in its Question of Compensation (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) case of February 2, 2018 provides a pioneering example of damage to the environment being litigated before an international tribunal. The judgment is the first time that the ICJ has adjudicated compensation for environmental damage, and it is only the third time the ICJ has awarded compensation at all. Nevertheless, the ICJ boldly asserted in this case that “damage to the environment, and the consequent impairment or loss of the ability of the environment to provide goods and services, is compensable under international law” (para. 42). That said, the reasoning employed by the Court leaves much to be desired. Given the increasing number of cases involving the environment, it is unfortunate that international courts and tribunals will garner only limited guidance from the methodology adopted by the ICJ in valuing environmental damage.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Nicaragua v"

1

Naranjo, Veronica. "The principle of non-intervention : a view through the case of Nicaragua v. the United States of America, (1984-1986)." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/3721.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Fukala, Martin. "Využívání přírodních zdrojů a ekosystémových služeb místními komunitami v regionu Carazo, Nicaragua." Master's thesis, 2019. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-426354.

Full text

Abstract:

FUKALA, Martin. The usage of natural resources and ecosystem services by local communities in region Carazo, Nicaragua. Diploma thesis. Brno: Mendel University, 2019. This diploma thesis aims to conduct a survey of methods for the use of local ecosystems and advantages that arise in form of ecosystem services in the case of local communities of Jinotepe and Diriamba municipalities, Carazo region, Nicaragua. The survey focused on the abovementioned problem using the method of a questionnaire filled in by selected respondents that referred to given ecosystem services. On the basis of the results provided, it has been shown that inhabitants of rural municipalities are more dependent on advantages arising from the ecosystems than those living in urban areas.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Nicaragua v"

1

Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis., ed. Nicaragua v. United States: A look at thefacts. Cambridge, Mass: Institute for Foreign Policy Analaysis, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Turner, Robert F. Nicaragua v. United States: A look at the facts. Cambridge, Mass: Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Justice, International Court of. Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua: Nicaragua v. United States of America. [The Hague]: The Court, 1986.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Zafren, Daniel Hill. Nicaragua v. United States: The International Court of Justice decision. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 1986.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Justice, International Court of. Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) =: Affaire des activités militaires et paramilitaires au Nicaragua et contre celui-ci (Nicaragua c. États-Unis d'Amérique). [The Hague]: International Court of Justice, 2000.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Justice, International Court of. Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) =: Affaire des activités militaires et paramilitaires au Nicaragua et contre celui-ci (Nicaragua c. États-Unis d'Amérique). [The Hague]: International Court of Justice, 2000.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Nicaragua. Affaire relative à des actions armées frontalières et transfrontalières (Nicaragua c. Honduras) =: Case concerning border and transborder armed actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras). [The Hague]: International Court of Justice, 1992.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Nicaragua. Case concerning border and transborder armed actions (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) =: Affaire relative à des actions armées frontalières et transfrontalières (Nicaragua c. Costa Rica). [The Hague]: International Court of Justice, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Justice, International Court of. Case concerning border and transborder armed actions (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) =: Affaire relative à des actions armées frontalières et transfrontalières (Nicaragua c. Costa Rica). The Hague: The Court, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Litigation strategy at the International Court: A case study of the Nicaragua v. United States dispute. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Nicaragua v"

1

Bordin, Fernando Lusa. "The Nicaragua v. United States Case: An Overview of the Epochal Judgments." In Nicaragua Before the International Court of Justice, 59–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62962-9_4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Reichler, Paul S., and Yuri B. Parkhomenko. "Nicaragua v. United States and Matters of Evidence Before the International Court of Justice." In Nicaragua Before the International Court of Justice, 43–56. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62962-9_3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Martin, Lawrence H., and Yuri B. Parkhomenko. "The Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia) and Its Implications for Future Maritime Delimitations in the Caribbean Sea and Elsewhere." In Nicaragua Before the International Court of Justice, 113–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62962-9_6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Medaglia, Jorge Cabrera, and Miguel Saldivia Olave. "Sustainable development law principles in the Costa Rica v Nicaragua 1 territorial disputes." In Sustainable Development Principles in the Decisions of International Courts and Tribunals, 255–65. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge,2017. | Series: Routledge research in international environmental law: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315769639-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

"Nicaragua." In World Statistics Pocketbook (Ser. V), 142. UN, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/1fe3d0a8-en.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

"Nicaragua." In World Statistics Pocketbook (Ser. V), 148. UN, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/35bc9055-en.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

"Nicaragua." In World Statistics Pocketbook (Ser. V), 182. UN, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/d5ee2abe-en.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

"I.2 LEGAL MAXIMS: SUMMARIES AND EXTRACTS FROM SELECTED CASE LAW." In The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2019, edited by Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo, 387–98. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513552.003.0017.

Full text

Abstract:

Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Compensation Owed by the Republic of Nicaragua to the Republic of Costa Rica, Judgment, 2 February 2018 Contents ^** I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND II. LEGAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION OBLIGATION TO MAKE FULL REPARATION...

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

"Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia)." In The World Court Reference Guide and Case-Law Digest, 447–56. Brill | Nijhoff, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004261891_037.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

"VII.2 LEGAL MAXIMS: SUMMARIES AND EXTRACTS FROM SELECTED CASE LAW." In The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2019, edited by Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo, 647–90. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513552.003.0029.

Full text

Abstract:

Caso Poblete Vilches y Otros v. Chile, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas, Sentencia de 8 de Marzo de 2018, Serie C No. 349 Caso V.R.P., V.P.C. y Otros v. Nicaragua, Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas, Sentencia de 8 de Marzo de 2018, Serie C No. 350...

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!