Relevant bibliographies by topics / Nicholas Kaldor / Journal articles
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Nicholas Kaldor.

Journal articles on the topic 'Nicholas Kaldor'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Nicholas Kaldor.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Desai, M. "Nicholas Kaldor." History of Political Economy 44, no. 4 (2012): 697–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-1811415.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Blitch, C. P. "Nicholas Kaldor." History of Political Economy 21, no. 4 (1989): 743–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-21-4-743.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hahn, Frank, and Robin Matthews. "Nicholas Kaldor (Lord Kaldor), 1908-1986." Economic Journal 104, no. 425 (1994): 901. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2234984.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Jefferson, Therese, and John King. "Nicholas Kaldor and Critical Realism." Review of Political Economy 21, no. 3 (2009): 463–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538250903073537.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Deprez, Johan. "Nicholas Kaldor and the Real World." Journal of Economic Issues 28, no. 4 (1994): 1311–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1994.11505631.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Galbraith, John Kenneth, Anthony P. Thirlwall, and Douglas Wass. "Nicholas Kaldor. Grand Masters in Economics Series." Economic Journal 98, no. 392 (1988): 851. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2233922.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Targetti, Ferdinando. "Nicholas Kaldor: Key Contributions to Development Economics." Development and Change 36, no. 6 (2005): 1185–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155x.2005.00456.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Chandra, Ramesh, and Roger J. Sandilands. "Nicholas Kaldor, increasing returns and Verdoorn’s Law." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 44, no. 2 (2021): 315–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2021.1872030.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Rima, Ingrid H., Edward Nell, and Willi Semmler. "Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics: Confrontation or Convergence?" Southern Economic Journal 60, no. 1 (1993): 244. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1059949.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sawyer, Malcolm, Edward J. Nell, and Willi Semmler. "Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics: Confrontation or Convergence?" Economic Journal 102, no. 415 (1992): 1579. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2234836.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Chandra, Ramesh. "Nicholas Kaldor on Adam Smith and Allyn Young." Review of Political Economy 31, no. 3 (2019): 445–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2019.1685798.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Pressman, Steven, and Richard P. F. Holt. "Nicholas Kaldor and Cumulative Causation: Public Policy Implications." Journal of Economic Issues 42, no. 2 (2008): 367–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507145.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Landesmann, Michael. "Nicholas Kaldor and Kazimierz Łaski on the pitfalls of the European integration process." European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 16, no. 3 (2019): 344–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2019.03.05.

Full text
Abstract:
Nicholas Kaldor and Kazimierz Łaski have been two very prominent exponents of Keynesian thinking. They both contributed to the debate on European economic integration, one (Nicholas Kaldor) in the early 1970s, when there were fierce debates about the United Kingdom's entry to the European Communities, and the other (Kazimierz Łaski) in the wake of the financial and economic crisis of 2008–2012, when the European Union and its Economic and Monetary Union were seriously challenged by potential disintegration. Both exponents provided deep and complementary inputs into an understanding of the centrifugal forces at work when a region with a rudimentary federal structure (but an extremely weak ‘central state’) embarks on tight economic integration with an inadequate macroeconomic policy framework in place.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Thirlwall, Anthony Philip. "Nicholas Kaldor’s life and insights into the applied economics of growth." Acta Oeconomica 67, s1 (2017): 11–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/032.2017.67.s.2.

Full text
Abstract:
This article celebrates the life and work of the Hungarian economist Nicholas Kaldor, and particularly his emphasis on industrial structure and the role of demand in determining the growth performance of nations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Jones, Charles I., and Paul M. Romer. "The New Kaldor Facts: Ideas, Institutions, Population, and Human Capital." American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2, no. 1 (2010): 224–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/mac.2.1.224.

Full text
Abstract:
In 1961, Nicholas Kaldor highlighted six “stylized” facts to summarize the patterns that economists had discovered in national income accounts and to shape the growth models being developed to explain them. Redoing this exercise today shows just how much progress we have made. In contrast to Kaldor's facts, which revolved around a single state variable, physical capital, our updated facts force consideration of four far more interesting variables: ideas, institutions, population, and human capital. Dynamic models have uncovered subtle interactions among these variables, generating important insights about such big questions as: Why has growth accelerated? Why are there gains from trade? (JEL D01, E01, E22, E23, E24, J11)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

King, J. E. "Not the Devil’s Decade: Nicholas Kaldor in the 1930s." History of Economics Review 46, no. 1 (2007): 39–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18386318.2007.11682109.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Botelho, Martinho Martins. "A Eficiência e o Efeito Kaldor-Hicks: A Questão da Compensação Social." Revista de Direito, Economia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável 2, no. 1 (2016): 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/indexlawjournals/2526-0057/2016.v2i1.1595.

Full text
Abstract:
O presente artigo pretende dar uma visão geral a respeito da eficiência econômica segundo os critérios de Nicholas Kaldor e John Hicks, além de tratar com maior particularidade o método desenvolvido por ambos os economistas para a chamada compensação social, que parte da ideia da recuperação das perdas sociais causadas por uma decisão eficientista, no sentido de maximização da riqueza. Trata-se de um dos conceitos de eficiência em Análise Econômica do Direito, ao qual se soma à eficiência alocativa e à eficiência paretiana. Será analisada a eficiência como pressuposto teórico na AED, a eficiência Kaldor-Hicks e a compensação social.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

King, J. E. "“Your Position is Thoroughly Orthodox and Entirely Wrong”: Nicholas Kaldor and Joan Robinson, 1933–1983." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20, no. 4 (1998): 411–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1053837200002443.

Full text
Abstract:
Nicholas Kaldor (1908-86) and Joan Robinson (1903-83) were almost exact contemporaries and enjoyed very similar careers. Both began as innovative but fundamentally orthodox microeconomists, soon turning (very early, in the case of Robinson) to the defense and development of Keynesian macroeconomics. They were both lifelong socialists and, during the Second World War, energetic propagandists for the fledgling British welfare state. In the 1950s each published a series of penetrating critiques of neoclassical distribution and growth theory, subsequently extending the attack to mainstream analyses of value, international trade, development, and the very foundations of equilibrium methodology. By 1975 Kaldor and Robinson were generally recognized as the founding parents of Post Keynesian economics in Britain, or what its U.S. progenitor Sidney Weintraub described as the “Kaldor-Kalecki-Robinson revolution in distribution theory” (Eichner and Kregel, 1975; Weintraub, 1972, p. 45). For some years they were close personal friends. They spent decades–indeed, Robinson spent her entire working life–in Cambridge, where they were belatedly appointed to chairs in 1966.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

King, J. E. "Introduction to an Unpublished Note by Nicholas Kaldor & Joan Robinson." Review of Political Economy 12, no. 3 (2000): 261–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538250050127436.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Setterfield, M. "History versus equilibrium: Nicholas Kaldor on historical time and economic theory." Cambridge Journal of Economics 22, no. 5 (1998): 521–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/22.5.521.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Mihalyi, Peter. "Kaldor and Kornai on economics without equilibrium – two life courses." Acta Oeconomica 67, s1 (2017): 47–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/032.2017.67.s.5.

Full text
Abstract:
Nicholas Kaldor and János Kornai are known in the academic literature as the most principled and unyielding opponents of the neoclassical, mainstream economics in general, and the Arrow-Debreu General Equilibrium Theory (GET) in particular since the beginning of the 1970s. Nevertheless, they remained in the minority camp with their views until today. The mainstream of the economic profession still holds that only the neoclassical paradigm offers a comprehensive, systematic, consistent and, above all, mathematical (hence “scientific”) description of how modern economies operate. This paper aims at investigating why these two prolific writers, who were friends and spoke the same mother tongue, did not find a common ground and did not even try to build a school of followers jointly.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Dimand, Robert W., and Ferdinando Targetti. "Nicholas Kaldor: The Economics and Politics of Capitalism as a Dynamic System." Economic Journal 103, no. 421 (1993): 1571. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2234497.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Hamouda, O. F. "Nicholas Kaldor: The Economics and Politics of Capitalism as a Dynamic System." History of Political Economy 28, no. 4 (1996): 705–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-28-4-705.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Conway, Patrick, and William A. Darity. "Growth and Trade with Asymmetric Returns to Scale: A Model for Nicholas Kaldor." Southern Economic Journal 57, no. 3 (1991): 745. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1059788.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Shaffer, James D. "Kaldor, Nicholas. Economics Without Equilibrium . New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1985,79 pp., $@@‐@@12.50." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, no. 2 (1986): 498–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1241481.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Holland, Stuart. "Kaldor after Ricardo, Keynes, and Kalecki: Perspectives on theory and policies." Acta Oeconomica 67, s1 (2017): 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/032.2017.67.s.4.

Full text
Abstract:
Nicholas Kaldor was a progressive force in economics who made several major contributions, which are well covered by other contributors to this issue in his memory. Yet, like most first generation Keynesians, he stayed within the paradigm of The Concluding Notes to the General Theory, in which Keynes claimed that provided the State intervened to manage the level of demand, the supply side of an economy could be left to the processes of perfect or imperfect competition, whereas Kalecki realised that oligopoly could influence both macroeconomic aggregates and policies. Like Keynes, he also assumed, with Ricardo, that trade was between different firms in different countries rather than recognising that capital already was multinational and that this could qualify both exchange rate changes such as that of the sterling in 1967 and his regional employment premium and selective employment tax.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Takami, Norikazu. "MODELS AND MATHEMATICS: HOW PIGOU CAME TO ADOPT THE IS-LM-MODEL REASONING." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 36, no. 2 (2014): 169–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1053837214000200.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper investigates how Arthur Pigou came to adopt the reasoning essentially based on the working of the IS-LM model and to admit that money wage cuts are neutral to employment under the liquidity trap. This occurred through his involvement in the controversy with John Maynard Keynes in 1937–38. In the first instance, Pigou used a simple model to oppose Keynes’s assertion on such neutrality. Pigou (and Keynes too) applied verbal logical analysis to the model to derive his conclusions. Submitting a paper to the Economic Journal, Nicholas Kaldor analyzed Pigou’s model in mathematical terms and asserted that Pigou derived inconsistent conclusions from his model. Kaldor’s method eventually convinced Pigou, Keynes, and Dennis Robertson (who participated in the debate in correspondence). The paper thus argues that the controversy was concluded when one form of model analysis replaced another; specifically, when mathematical analysis replaced verbal logical analysis. This study provides a case study to the first category of Mary Morgan’s two functions of economic modeling: models as an object to inquire into and models as an object with which to inquire.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Nakabashi, Luciano, Fábio Dória Scatolin, and Marcio José Vargas da Cruz. "Impactos da mudança estrutural da economia brasileira sobre o seu crescimento." Revista de Economia Contemporânea 14, no. 2 (2010): 237–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1415-98482010000200002.

Full text
Abstract:
Na abordagem estruturalista, o papel da indústria tem destaque na dinâmica da economia devido a fatores inerentes a esse setor. Dentre os autores clássicos que se destacam nesse campo, podemos ressaltar as contribuições de Raúl Prebisch, Celso Furtado, Albert Hirschman e Nicholas Kaldor, os quais, ao longo de suas respectivas obras, apresentaram valiosas interpretações sobre a dinâmica do desenvolvimento econômico e enfatizaram a importância do papel da indústria de transformação nesse processo. Com base nos argumentos iniciais desses autores, o presente estudo busca analisar os efeitos da mudança estrutural da economia brasileira sobre o seu desempenho, com ênfase no setor industrial, para o período 1948-2007.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Mommen, André. "Káldor versus Varga – The Hungarian three-year economic reconstruction plan of 1947." Acta Oeconomica 67, s1 (2017): 157–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/032.2017.67.s.11.

Full text
Abstract:
After a monetary reform in 1946, the Communists helped by Jenő Varga and the Social Democrats advised by Nicholas Kaldor each drafted an economic reconstruction plan introducing central planning. Having already campaigned for economic planning after the war, Káldor was also in favour of a Keynesian income and fiscal policy. Good trade relations with the Soviet Union were in his eyes a precondition for economic recovery and stability. But the non-participation of Hungary in the Marshall Plan weakened the authority of the Social Democrats vis-à-vis the Communists who were now pressing for a Soviet-type planning system and the dictatorship of the proletariat.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

HODGSON, GEOFFREY M., FRANCESCA GAGLIARDI, and DAVID GINDIS. "From Cambridge Keynesian to institutional economist: the unnoticed contributions of Robert Neild." Journal of Institutional Economics 14, no. 4 (2018): 767–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1744137417000534.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractRobert Neild (born 1924) has made a major contribution to economics and to peace studies. This paper provides a brief sketch of Neild's life and work. While noting his research in economic policy and peace studies, this essay devotes more attention to his largely unnoticed contributions to institutional and evolutionary economics since 1984. These are important in their own right, but they are especially notable because Cambridge heterodox economists have been devoted mainly to other approaches, including Marxism and post-Keynesianism. Neild's distinctive contribution is partly explained by his closeness to both Nicholas Kaldor and Gunnar Myrdal. Myrdal made explicit his adherence to the original American institutionalism: Neild extended that link to Cambridge.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Маркић, Брано, Сања Бијакшић та Арнела Беванда. "Индустријализација и раст бруто друштвеног производа // The Industrialization and Growth of Gross Domestic Product". ACTA ECONOMICA 13, № 22 (2018): 151. http://dx.doi.org/10.7251/ace1522151m.

Full text
Abstract:
Резиме: Рад је истраживање и емпиријска верификација закона Ницхолас Калдора о утицају индустријске производње на раст бруто друштвеног производа. Калдор је формулисао принципе економског раста у облику три закона који настоје утврдити кључне узроке економског раста. Први његов закон тврди да је стопа раста привреде позитивно корелирана са стопом раста њезина производног сектора. Индустрија као најважнија снага развоја привреде се поодавно анализира у литератури о привредном развоју: Hirschman (1961), Rosenstein-Rodan (1943), Th irnjall (2013), Cornnjall (1977). Циљ рада је емпиријски провјерити Калдоров приступ расту и развоју у Федерацији Босне и Херцеговине. Стога је обликован посебан скуп података кога чине дводимензионалне табеле и временске серије. Регресијском анализом је квантификована повезаност између стопа раста бруто друштвеног производа и стопе раста индустријске производње.Summary: The paper the industrialization and the growth of gross domestic product is a research and empirical verification of Nicholas Kaldor laws on the impact of industrial production to GDP growth. Kaldor has formulated the principles of economic growth in the form of three laws that tend to identify key causes of economic growth. His first law asserts that the rate of economic growth is positively correlated with the rate of growth of its manufacturing sector. Industry as the most important force of economic development is widely analyzed in the literature on economic development (Hirschman (1961), Rosenstein-Rodan (1943), Thirwall (2013), Cornwall (1977)). The aim is to empirically test the Kaldor’s approach to growth and development in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is therefore designed a special data set consisting of two-dimensional tables and time series. Using regression analysis was quantified the relationship between the growth rate of gross domestic product and the growth of industrial production.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

WHITING, R. C. "IDEOLOGY AND REFORM IN LABOUR'S TAX STRATEGY, 1964–1970." Historical Journal 41, no. 4 (1998): 1121–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x9800819x.

Full text
Abstract:
The tax strategy of the Labour governments of 1964–70 was intended to be both radical and reforming. That is, it had to fulfil the demands generated by the Labour movement as well as address issues of tax reform which were less closely tied to party politics. This article assesses Labour's ability to do this by paying particular attention to the contrasting budgets of 1965 and 1966. It examines the ideas of Nicholas Kaldor and the interests of the trade unions as two of the forces which shaped tax policy. While recognizing the difficulty of introducing new taxes, the article none the less sees much that was traditional in Labour's approach and offers a pessimistic view of the capacity of the party to change its outlook in the 1960s.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Pelle, Anita. "The intra-EU migration challenge in the light of Kaldor’s legacy." Acta Oeconomica 67, s1 (2017): 175–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/032.2017.67.s.12.

Full text
Abstract:
The free movement of persons has been one of the fundamental building blocks of European integration from the beginning. The economics behind it implies that greater efficiency can be achieved if besides goods and services, the factors of production (i.e. capital and labour) can also move freely across a common market. Nevertheless, this setup was originally designed for an economic area where internal imbalances were modest. In fact, these freedoms have serious, originally unintended consequences in the 21st-century European Union (EU) where the original condition, even if implicit at that time, no longer applies. Nicholas Kaldor had actually warned about these threats many decades ago, saying that with the development of trade, initial differences among trading regions would grow in the absence of adequate compensating policies. Most lately, two large-scale events have accelerated intra-EU divergence and, consequently, migration: the Eastern enlargements and the recent financial and economic crisis. Our study focuses on the causes and potential implications of the intra-EU migration challenge in the light of Kaldor’s legacy. Our main conclusion is that the original construct of European economic integration is not fit for the current realities in that it no longer ensures steady and balanced development across the EU.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Firme, Vinícius, and Joanílio Teixeira. "Index of macroeconomic performance for a subset of countries: A Kaldorian analysis from the magic square approach focusing on Brazilian economy in the period 1997-2012." Panoeconomicus 61, no. 5 (2014): 527–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/pan1405527f.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper aims to evaluate the macroeconomic performance of some chosen countries in the period 1997-2012 using the four variables that compose the ?magic square? diagram suggested by Nicholas Kaldor (1971). In order to avoid problems with the variables? scale, the standardized ?Index of Economic Welfare? created by Ren? A. Medrano-B and Joan?lio R. Teixeira (2013) was utilized. The results showed a good performance of China and the Asian countries. Furthermore, in spite of the impact of the crises of 1998 and 2008 into Russia, this country presented a good recuperation and achieved a high index just after these crises. The Brazilian performance was somewhat surprising. The country showed a low growth rate and a progressive current account deficit, both typical of developed nations, along with a high inflation, typical of developing countries. A positive aspect seems to be the country?s capability of avoiding external crises, like the verified in 2008-2009.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Andersson, Per F. "The impact of experts on tax policy in post-war Britain and Sweden." Acta Oeconomica 67, s1 (2017): 79–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/032.2017.67.s.7.

Full text
Abstract:
During the decades after World War II, countries began shifting taxation from income to consumption. This shift has been associated with an expanding welfare state and left-wing dominance. However, the pattern is far from uniform and while some left-wing governments indeed expanded consumption taxation, others did not. This paper seeks to explain why, by exploring how experts influenced post-war tax policy in Britain and Sweden. Experts influence is crucial when explaining how the left began to see consumption tax not as a threat but as an opportunity. Interestingly, the influence of experts such as Nicholas Kaldor in Britain was different from the impact of Swedish experts (e.g. Gösta Rehn). I make the argument that the impact of expert advice is contingent on the political risks facing governments. The low risks facing the Swedish Left made it more amenable to the advantages of broad-based sales taxes, while the high-risk environment in Britain made Labour reject these ideas.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Davenport, Paul. "Investissement, progrès technique et croissance économique." Articles 58, no. 1-2 (2009): 153–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/601018ar.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This paper combines a critical review of the current state of the theory of economic growth with some suggestions for new directions in growth theory. The development of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution is surveyed, with emphasis on the distribution theory of J.B. Clark, the regression analysis of C.W. Cobb and P.H. Douglas, the growth accounting of R.M. Solow and E.F. Denison, and the reswitching controversy, involving critical contributions by Joan Robinson, Piero Sraffa, and Luigi Pasinetti. Neoclassical growth models, including vintage models, are based on the theoretical separation of investment and technical change, which leads to the curious conclusion that investment is not a central part of the growth process. Post-Keynesian growth models, such as those of Nicholas Kaldor and John Cornwall, deny that such a separation is theoretically or empirically meaningful, and instead put investment at the heart of the growth process. The paper constructs a growth model along post-Keynesian lines, in which the growth rate, the distribution of income, and the normal unemployment rate are endogenous functions of the propensity to invest.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Groenewegen, Peter. "Thirlwall, Anthony P., Nicholas Kaldor. Grand Masters in Economics series. General editor, Blaug, Mark, (Brighton: Wheatsheaf, 1987. Pp. xix + 260. $49.95.)." Australian Economic History Review 29, no. 1 (1989): 93–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aehr.291br7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Wulwick, Nancy J. "Kaldor's Growth Theory." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14, no. 1 (1992): 36–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1053837200004387.

Full text
Abstract:
The last decade has seen an outburst of growth models designed to replace the conventional Solow growth model, with its exogenous trend of technical progress, by more realistic models that generate increasing returns (to labor, capital and/or scale) as a result of endogenous technical progress. In contrast to the Solow model, the new models suggest that policy interventions can affect the long-run rate of economic growth. Nicholas Kaldor's growth model, designed in the late 1950s and early 1960s to replace the Solow growth model, is a precursor of the new growth models.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Colacchio, Giorgio, and Guglielmo Forges Davanzati. "Endogenous money, increasing returns and economic growth: Nicholas Kaldor’s contribution." Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 41 (June 2017): 79–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.04.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

"Nicholas Kaldor." Journal of Macroeconomics 11, no. 3 (1989): 469–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(89)90082-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

"Nicholas Kaldor." Journal of Macroeconomics 16, no. 2 (1994): 378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(94)90089-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

"Nicholas Kaldor—an appreciation." Cambridge Journal of Economics, December 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

"Nicholas Kaldor and the real world." Choice Reviews Online 31, no. 05 (1994): 31–2806. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-2806.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

"Nicholas Kaldor on Indian economic problems." Cambridge Journal of Economics, March 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035086.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

"Nicholas Kaldor and tax reform in developing countries." Cambridge Journal of Economics, March 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035082.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Vital, Kaio Glauber. "Entre avanços e inconsistências: as contribuições de Nicholas Kaldor, Michal Kalecki e Joan Robinson para a teoria pós-keynesiana da distribuição de renda." História Econômica & História de Empresas 19, no. 2 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.29182/hehe.v19i2.373.

Full text
Abstract:
O objetivo do artigo é resgatar as contribuições de Nicholas Kaldor, Michal Kalecki e Joan Robinson para o desenvolvimento da teoria pós-keynesiana da distribuição de renda. Em primeiro lugar, localizamos o debate de Keynes com Dunlop, Tarshis e Kalecki como ponto de partida para as posteriores análises da temática da distribuição de renda na teoria pós-keynesiana. Em seguida, analisamos as contribuições de Kaldor, Kalecki e Robinson para o desenvolvimento de uma teoria pós-keynesiana da distribuição de renda. A hipótese central do presente estudo é que os autores possuem uma característica em comum fundamental para o pensamento pós-keynesiano: a poupança se ajusta a dado nível de investimento (determinado de forma independente via animal spirits), através da redistribuição de renda entre salários e lucros.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Araujo, Elisangela Luzia. "A relação entre indústria e crescimento econômico: As leis de Kaldor." A Economia em Revista - AERE 20, no. 1 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/aere.v20i1.31481.

Full text
Abstract:
A teoria neoclássica é indiferente no que se refere à importância dos setores/atividades econômicas na geração da renda, dando ênfase às vantagens comparativas de um país. Todavia, inspirado na macroeconomia keynesiana, que concebe a economia segundo a ótica da demanda, tem-se a abordagem de Nicholas Kaldor ([1966) que defende que, aquilo que se produz e exporta importa para o crescimento econômico. Os estudos do autor partiram do contexto do crescimento lento do Reino Unido nos anos 1950 e 1960 e a investigação dessa problemática resultou na elaboração de conjunto de leis que ficaram conhecidas como as "leis de Kaldor". Derivadas de testes econométricos, essas leis buscavam explicar, por meio de fatos estilizados, as dinâmicas de crescimento nas economias capitalistas, conferindo-se um papel central para a indústria de transformação que foi considerada como sendo o "motor do crescimento".
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

"Nicholas Kaldor: the economics and politics of capitalism as a dynamic system." Choice Reviews Online 30, no. 11 (1993): 30–6287. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-6287.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Thuronyi, Victor. "A Supplemental Expenditure Tax for Canada." Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne, October 2019, 711–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2019.67.3.sym.thuronyi.

Full text
Abstract:
A supplemental expenditure tax (SET) could be imposed at progressive rates in addition to the income tax, and income tax rates lowered correspondingly. The SET is a progressive cash flow consumption tax originally proposed by Nicholas Kaldor in 1955. Its enactment would facilitate income tax reform and simplification--for example, by taxing capital gains at the same rates as ordinary income--and would enable the alternative minimum tax to be repealed. It could be designed so as to facilitate compliance with little additional information required beyond what already has to be gathered for income tax purposes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

"Book Reviews." Journal of Economic Literature 53, no. 2 (2015): 364–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.2.360.r4.

Full text
Abstract:
John Harvey of Texas Christian University reviews “Distribution and Growth after Keynes: A Post-Keynesian Guide”, by Eckhard Hein. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Focuses on the link between “functional income distribution” and growth or economic development in theories of distribution and growth after John Maynard Keynes. Discusses from Keynes to Evsey David Domar and Roy Forbes Harrod─considering the capacity effect of investment and an attempt at dynamic theory; Neoclassical distribution and growth theory─old and new and a critique; post-Keynesian distribution and growth theories I─Nicholas Kaldor, Luigi L. Pasinetti, Anthony P. Thirlwall, and Joan Robinson; post-Keynesian distribution and growth theories II─Michal Kalecki and Josef Steindl; the basic Kaleckian distribution and growth models; extending Kaleckian models I─saving out of wages and open economy issues; extending Kaleckian models II─technical progress; extending Kaleckian models III─interest and credit; extending Kaleckian models IV─finance-dominated capitalism; and the Kaleckian models and classical, Marxian, and Harrodian critique.” Hein is Professor at the Berlin School of Economics and Law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography