Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'NJA 2007 s. 86'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'NJA 2007 s. 86.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "NJA 2007 s. 86"
Suci, D. M., Supanti Supanti, Yudhi Setiyantari, and Romasta Napitupulu. "Pemberian Berbagai Level Eceng Gondok (Eichornia crassipes) dan Minyak Ikan (Centrophorus atromarginatus) dalam Ransum Puyuh terhadap Performa, Kolesterol dan Profil Asam Lemak Telur." Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan 18, no. 1 (April 30, 2020): 24–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.29244/jintp.18.1.24-31.
Full textSuci, D. M., Supanti Supanti, Yudhi Setiyantari, and Romasta Napitupulu. "Pemberian Berbagai Level Eceng Gondok (Eichornia crassipes) dan Minyak Ikan (Centrophorus atromarginatus) dalam Ransum Puyuh terhadap Performa, Kolesterol dan Profil Asam Lemak Telur." Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan 18, no. 1 (July 5, 2020): 24–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.29244/jintp.v18i1.30993.
Full textAzcona, A., S. Roth, and R. Spiegel. "Effects of the Muscarinic Agonist RS 86 in Healthy Volunteers." Pharmacopsychiatry 19, no. 04 (July 1986): 323–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1017256.
Full textBerger, M., J. Krieg, R. Rummler, C. Raptis, A. Morinigo, M. Dose, and B. Benker. "The Treatment of Mania with the Cholinomimetic Drug RS 86." Pharmacopsychiatry 19, no. 04 (July 1986): 326–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1017257.
Full textGöbel, U., M. Bamberg, R. Haas, J. P. Bökkerink, G. Brämswig, G. Calaminus, J. Engert, et al. "Nichttestikuläre Keimzelltumoren: Analyse der Therapiestudie MAKEI 83/86 und Protokolländerungen für die Nachfolgestudie." Klinische Pädiatrie 201, no. 04 (July 1989): 247–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1025312.
Full textParte, Priyanka, and H. Juneja. "Assessment of Bioactivity of WHO/NIH Research Standard for Inhibin (Code 86/690) Using Two Separate Pituitary Cell-Culture Systems." Hormone and Metabolic Research 25, no. 07 (July 1993): 356–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1002119.
Full textSchubert, T., F. Brunner, and W. Müller. "The Interaction of RS 86, a Centrally Acting m-Cholinoceptor Agonist with M1and M2Receptors in Rat Brain and Rat Heart, Respectively*." Pharmacopsychiatry 21, no. 06 (November 1988): 321–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1016994.
Full textLudwig, W., J. Teichmann, C. Sperling, B. Komischke, J. Ritter, A. Reiter, E. Odenwald, S. Sauter, and H. Riehm. "Inzidenz, klinische Merkmale und prognostische Bedeutung immunologischer Subtypen der akuten lymphoblastischen Leukämie (ALL) im Kindesalter: Erfahrungen der Therapiestudien ALL-BFM 83 und 86." Klinische Pädiatrie 202, no. 04 (July 1990): 243–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1025528.
Full textSASAKI, Y., A. IKEDA, K. ISHIKAWA, M. MURAKAMI, M. KUSUKAWA, T. ASAI, and Y. YAMADA. "Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella in Japanese broiler flocks." Epidemiology and Infection 140, no. 11 (January 27, 2012): 2074–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0950268812000039.
Full textWARE, JESSICA L., JOHN P. SIMAIKA, and MICHAEL J. SAMWAYS. "Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation." Zootaxa 2216, no. 1 (September 1, 2009): 22–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2216.1.2.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "NJA 2007 s. 86"
Westerblad, Thingstad Angelica. "Upplysningspliktens vara eller icke vara : i belysning av NJA 2007 s. 86." Thesis, Örebro University, Department of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-4797.
Full textSyftet med uppsatsen är att beskriva och utreda en säljares upplysningsplikt vid försäljning av fast egendom. Frågeställningen aktualiseras därför att i rättsfallet NJA 2007 s. 86 har en säljare ålagts en upplysningsplikt trots att huvudregeln enligt gällande rätt är att säljaren inte har någon upplysningsplikt. I uppsatsen utreds även om utgången i målet kan anses förenlig med lagstiftning och rättspraxis på området. I syftet ingår också att besvara hur omfattande säljarens upplysningsplikt anses vara samt vilket prejudikatvärde NJA 2007 s. 86 bör ges.
Upplysningsplikt för en säljare finns inte upptagen i lagtext utan framgår av att denne enligt rättspraxis kan bli ansvarig för fel om säljaren vid köpet förfarit svikligt eller handlat i strid mot tro och heder enligt 30 § eller 33 § avtalslagen (1915:218). I proposition 1989/90:77 s. 41 påpekas att en säljare inte skall anses ha någon generell upplysningsplikt.
I NJA 2007 s. 86 ålades en säljare av fastighet en upplysningsplikt. Fallet rörde frågan om en köpare haft rätt att häva köp av fastighet på grund av fel utgörandes av buller från en motocrossbana oavsett att köparen inte iakttagit sin undersökningsplikt. Trots att banan var belägen på ansenligt avstånd från fastigheten, kunde buller höras på fastigheten i sådan utsträckning att bullervallar tvingades uppföras vid banan. Säljaren hade upplevt bullret som påfrestande och domstolen konstaterade att säljaren bland annat borde ha insett att banans existens skulle kunna vara av väsentlig vetskap för köparen. Säljaren borde därför ha upplyst köparen om banan. Köpet hävdes. Sedan rättsfallets tillkomst har domen debatterats flitigt. Anledningen till den uppmärksamhet som domen har fått är att säljaren ålades en upplysningsplikt som inte grundades på de ovan nämnda paragraferna i avtalslagen. Domen motiverades istället med att säljaren borde kunna bli felansvarig för sitt handlande utan att agerandet inordnas under avtalslagens bestämmelser samt på lagstiftarens vilja att anpassa felreglerna i jordabalken till köplagens regler om fel...
Carlén, Maja. "Säljarens upplysningsplikt vid fastighetsköp : En analys av rättsfallet NJA 2007 s. 86." Thesis, Örebro universitet, Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-92944.
Full textRehn, Patrik. "Begreppet väsentlig betydelse – särskilt i förhållande till köparens undersökningsplikt och säljarens upplysningsplikt." Thesis, Internationella Handelshögskolan, Högskolan i Jönköping, IHH, Redovisning och Rättsvetenskap, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-23690.
Full textIn connection with a property transaction there are some responsibilities that have been split up between the parties. The buyer of the property has a responsibility to investigate the property before to find out factual errors in the property. On the other side the seller has a kind of responsibility to inform the buyer and the seller is also responsible for other kinds of errors in the property. The buyer of the property do by law not have the right to refer a factual error against the seller that the buyer is supposed to find during the examination of the property at hand. Due to the ruling by the Swedish supreme court in the case NJA 2007 s 86 have the question about an errors essential reason for the transaction and the specific buyer occurred. The Swedish Supreme Court does not investigate further into this why this is the subject of this thesis. The investigation in this thesis have been done by looking into case law from the Swedish courts since there is not much information about the subject to find in the Swedish legislation. The investigations finds out that there are some criteria that need to be evaluated in connection to if a factual error is of essential reason for the buyer and the transaction. There are some criteria that are of a more objective level close to the actual property. On the other side there are also some criteria that are of a more subject material and closely linked to the actual buyer of the property. According to the investigation it is not possible to give an exact ruling about the subject due to the fact that every property and potential buyer is unique.
Svensson, Jenny. "Fastighetsägares upplysningsplikt : Gränszonen mellan dolda och svårupptäckta faktiska fel." Thesis, Internationella Handelshögskolan, Högskolan i Jönköping, IHH, Rättsvetenskap, 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-14008.
Full textAbstractWhen selling a property many matters need to be taken in account for, such as the contract between the parties with all the forms prescribed by law. When settling which party that should carry the liability regarding upcoming errors on the property the legislator has chosen to facilitate the burden of liability between the parties, a delegation that is a quite complicated matter. The buyer is obligated to examine the property for errors that are factual; it is laid down by law that a buyer does not pos-sess the right to refer to factual errors on the property that the buyer would have found while examining.Delegation of liability was subject of matter when the Swedish Supreme Court made the rulings in case NJA 2007 s. 86 public. The property owner was signed a general liability re-garding errors that are factual. The legal position is somewhat indecisive on this liability due to lack of reasoning from the Swedish Supreme Court on how to implement this new liabil-ity. When analyzing relevant case law the author is of the conclusion that, the property owner’s liability to inform the buyer regarding errors that are factual only should be imple-mented when he has not informed the buyer about the errors he has knowledge about. Furthermore the factual errors have to be of a severe nature and the property owner must have understood that the buyer was without knowledge of the errors. The focal point re-gards the knowledge of the property owner regarding the factual errors and the severity of the same. The author is of the conclusion that liability can be signed the property owner only in those cases where the errors is of a severe nature. However uncertainty remains pending rulings from the Swedish Supreme Court on the question. Thus, following the Swedish Supreme Court regarding further case law to see how they interprets the liability will most certainly be of interest.
Books on the topic "NJA 2007 s. 86"
Miscellaneous national parks bills: Hearing before the Subcommittee on National Parks of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, on S. 86, S. 1365, S. 1449, S. 1921, S. 1941, S. 1961, S. 1991, S. 2098, S. 2220, H.R. 1191, November 8, 2007. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2008.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on National Parks. Miscellaneous national parks bills: Hearing before the Subcommittee on National Parks of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, on S. 86, S. 1365, S. 1449, S. 1921, S. 1941, S. 1961, S. 1991, S. 2098, S. 2220, H.R. 1191, November 8, 2007. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2008.
Find full text