Academic literature on the topic 'Non-denominational religious teaching'

The problem of teaching the course "Christian Ethics" in the Ukrainian school is one of the most debatable in the educational, scientific and religious environment. Immediately with the experimental introduction of the training course in 1992, this issue has become publicly relevant and is still at the center of controversy, despite its legislative clarity. The Orthodox and Greek Catholic Churches of Ukraine actively insist on their presence in mainstream schools and do not see (or do not want to see) alternatives. While Protestant churches, especially the small ones, want only one, so that they do not interfere with the creation of their church schools, both for teaching and for spiritual education. For example, the Seventh-day Adventist Church believes that in a multi-denominational state, state and spiritual education should be separated. Moreover, the experience of teaching so-called Christian ethics demonstrates that it violates the principle of freedom of conscience, since theology cannot be super-denominational, unrelated to a particular church.

A sample of 285 teachers concerned with teaching religious education in state maintained secondary schools completed a questionnaire concerned with five different aims in religious education. The data demonstrate that teachers in Roman Catholic schools give the same emphasis as teachers in non-denominational schools to four of these aims: to understand the influence of religion, to think critically about religion, to reflect on ultimate questions, and to develop a positive attitude toward religion. At the same time teachers in Roman Catholic schools give greater emphasis than teachers in non-denominational schools to the confessional aim of promoting a religious way of life.

In educational contexts, certain issues are perceived as controversial, since they reflect conflicts of interest and reveal divergent views. This is especially evident in debates related to religion in societies regarding themselves as secular but whose population is multi-religious. The aim of this article is to analyse how some issues that are considered controversial in the public debate are represented in the teaching of non-denominational and integrative Religious Education in a Swedish multicultural classroom practice, where the majority of students have a Muslim cultural background. The ethnographic empirical material consists of classroom observations of Religious Education lessons in upper secondary school. The analysis is based on the debate about how controversial issues ought to be taught—as empirically or politically open/settled or in a directive/non-directive way. The results indicate that a number of issues—divergent interpretations of religious narratives and religiously motivated rules, holidays, views of forgiveness, the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and abortion—were regarded as open political issues in classroom practice and these were taught in an open, non-directive way. Issues represented as settled were value-oriented issues related to female genital mutilation, forced marriage and child marriage and gender equality. The arguments supporting these values were mainly rooted in religion.

Abstract With the increase of non-denominational pupils, the insight into how knowledge is conditioned by the social and local context gains significance for religious education. The following article examines the interaction of teaching/taught players within the classroom setting of religious education. The fundamental didactic responsibility is to sensitize pupils for religious interpretations and -lifestyle and to mark its plausibility beside a natural-scientific worldview which is common sense. According to the article this may be reached by creating possibilities and settings within the lessons allowing the pupils to be in contact with authentic representatives and by addressing essential issues concerning their life. Finally, the author expounds the prospects of the empowerment-concept within classroom settings and formulates a standard of religious education saying religious education has to enable the development of personality in its social context.

There is much emphasis today on inclusion and diversity in educational systems. As the place of religious belief remains a significant factor in such debates, there is a need for shared understanding of the language and purpose of Religious Education in schools. Given the substantial international footprint of Catholic schools, the conceptual framework of Religious Education in Catholic schools merits serious scrutiny. The Catholic Church’s written teaching on education has a strong focus on the contemporary school as a site of intercultural dialogue. The related teaching on Religious Education in schools, however, remains underdeveloped, with strong voices debating the desirability, or otherwise, of a strong focus on ‘faith formation and practice’ as an outcome of Religious Education. Problematically, terms like ‘Religious Education’ have inconsistent translations in the official documents of the Catholic Church, leading to a plurality of understandings internationally of the ultimate aim of the subject. A presentation of the linguistic inconsistency between English and Italian translations of documents of the Holy See reveals the scale of the challenge. This unsatisfactory arrangement needs reform. Rooted in a close critical study of Catholic teaching on education, the article presents two arguments designed to initiate the reform process: (a) the Catholic Church’s settled teaching on Religious Education must develop greater internal cohesion before it can make a meaningful contribution to intercultural dialogue, and (b) an International Directory of Religious Education, written collegially by qualified lay people and clergy, will build stronger foundations for shared understanding of the aims and scope of Religious Education among key stakeholders in Catholic schools. This shift in direction will harmonise Religious Education expectations in Catholic schools, and offer firmer ground for dialogue with those who manage and teach Religious Education in so-called ‘non-denominational’ schools.

This article addresses how a language and practice of non-denominational universality is used within the Oneness movement, and the ways in which this universality has been crucial in order to appeal to a global audience. The Oneness movement, founded by the couple Sri Amma and Bhagavan, originated in South India in the 1990s, and has gained a substantial international following during the last decade. The cornerstone of the movement is the practice of giving and receiving deeksha, a kind of energy transmission said to usher the receiver into a state of higher consciousness. Drawing on empirical material collected during fieldwork with Oneness groups in India and Sweden, and taking the concepts of portable practice and transposable message as a point of departure, the practice of deeksha and the message of an all-encompassing human potential for spiritual awakening is analysed in order to find the themes that have made Oneness appealing in a global context. It is argued that the diffusion of Oneness into new cultures has been a balancing act between on the one hand adaptation to local cultures, and on the other hand claims of universal applicability and validity. By making use of the argument that their spiritual message stretches beyond boundaries such as those imposed by culture and religion, the Oneness movement sees its message as compatible with most (if not all) major religious traditions, and can thus encourage cultural adaptation of their teachings without loosing their credibility. This makes the language of universality function as an important strategy in the process of acquiring legitimacy on a global level.

Cette thèse fut réalisée en codirection avec la Faculté des sciences de l'éducation de l'Université de Montréal. Elle fut produite grâce à l’importante contribution financière de nombreux organismes subventionnaires, soit le Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada (CRSH), le Fonds de recherche du Québec – Société et Culture (FRQSC); aussi financés par le CRSH, le Projet religion et diversité (dir. Lori G. Beaman, Université d’Ottawa), le projet IRTG-Diversité (Groupe international de formation en recherche sur la diversité) (dir. Laurence McFalls, Université de Montréal; dir. Ursula Lehmkuhl, Université de Trèves), la Chaire en gestion de la diversité culturelle et religieuse (CGDCR) dont Solange Lefebvre est titulaire ainsi que la Faculté de sciences des religions et théologie de l’Université de Montréal.
Le programme québécois non confessionnel d’Éthique et culture religieuse (ECR) exige de ses enseignants une posture professionnelle d’impartialité et d’objectivité. Cette dernière suscite une controverse sociale et des poursuites judiciaires. Les détracteurs du programme, comme ses défenseurs, invoquent l’impartialité de l’enseignement pour justifier leur position, mais en y conférant un sens différent. Malgré l’importance de cette question, aucune recherche empirique ne propose d’analyser l’impartialité des enseignants. Sur le plan théorique, on rencontre une diversité d’usages des concepts. Cette thèse propose une clarification de la question, tant sur le plan théorique que pratique. Une analyse approfondie de la posture professionnelle d’impartialité exigée en ECR est effectuée en première partie. S’ensuit une clarification des concepts d’impartialité, d’objectivité et de neutralité. Si le terme neutralité semble dominer la littérature en éducation et en politique, l’objectivité est principalement utilisée pour définir la posture du chercheur scientifique et le savoir qu’il produit. De son côté, l’impartialité est le parent pauvre de la littérature, particulièrement en éducation. Elle se trouve mieux définie dans le domaine de la justice et du droit, qualifiant surtout l’impartialité du juge. Dans la deuxième partie de cette thèse, la méthodologie, les résultats d’analyse d’entrevues et ceux des observations sont présentés en examinant comment les enseignants d’ECR problématisent et négocient avec l’exigence d’impartialité professionnelle. La thèse innove aussi en analysant tant le propos que la mise en pratique de cette exigence d’impartialité en ECR chez 12 enseignants « typiques » ou « exemplaires » au secondaire provenant de milieux socioculturels différents (écoles privées confessionnelles ou publiques non confessionnelles de milieu multiculturel ou non multiculturel), répondant aux questions suivantes : Comment les enseignants conçoivent-ils l’impartialité exigée en ECR? Comment l’impartialité exigée en ECR est-elle mise en pratique dans l’enseignement d’ECR au secondaire? Réalisées à partir d’une approche déductive thématique, les analyses transversales des observations non participantes en classe et des entrevues semi-directives d’enseignants permettent de cerner les liens existant entre l’analyse théorique des prescriptions du programme ECR réalisée en première instance et les données qualitatives recueillies en deuxième instance. Dans la discussion sont présentés les six principaux résultats se dégageant des analyses des 12 enseignants participants. Proposant une réflexion critique sur l’impartialité exigée en ECR, les résultats empiriques sont approfondis par les analyses théoriques, contribuant aussi à éclairer la question dans les domaines préoccupés par des défis professionnels similaires. Le premier résultat indique qu’il n’y a aucune influence des variables personnelles ou professionnelles des enseignants participants sur leur compréhension et leur mise en pratique de l’impartialité professionnelle exigée en ECR. Le deuxième rappelle qu’il existe une polysémie et une confusion conceptuelle entre les termes neutralité, impartialité et objectivité, tant chez nos enseignants que dans la littérature. La thèse propose à ce sujet des voies de clarification utiles. S’appuyant sur une typologie de l’impartialité élaborée en première partie, le troisième résultat explique que l’impartialité absolue ou « axiologique » est généralement rejetée. Le quatrième résultat rappelle que la notion de distance critique s’avère être le fondement de l’impartialité exigée en ECR. Le cinquième montre les différences entre l’impartialité religieuse et éthique, les questions d’endoctrinement religieux et d’expression ou non des croyances religieuses personnelles dominant la question de l’impartialité. Quant au sixième résultat, il résume les nombreux problèmes associés à l’exigence d’intervenir à partir des finalités du programme, ces finalités renvoyant à des concepts polysémiques et flous pour les enseignants.
The non-denominational Quebec program Ethics and Religious Culture (ERC) requires that its teachers adopt a professional stance that is both impartial and objective. The program has provoked social controversy and lawsuits, with its critics appealing to teacher impartiality to justify their position, but interpreting it differently than do its advocates. Despite the importance of this issue, no empirical research has been put forward to analyze teacher impartiality. As for theory, we find these concepts used in a wide variety of ways. This dissertation proposes to clarify the issue, from both a theoretical and practical perspective. In the first section, we present an in-depth analysis of the professional stance of impartiality required in ERC. Following that is an explanation of the concepts of impartiality, objectivity and neutrality. While the term ‘neutrality’ seems to dominate educational and political literature, objectivity is mainly used to describe the stance of scientific researchers and the knowledge they produce. As for impartiality, it is the ‘poor cousin’ in literature, especially in education. It is more clearly defined in the domains of justice and law, characterizing in particular a judge’s impartiality. In the second section of this dissertation, we present the methodology used and the results of analyzing interviews and observations, by examining how ERC teachers problematize and negotiate the requirement of professional impartiality. Our innovative approach analyzes not only the implementation of this ERC impartiality requirement, but the discourse of 12 ‘typical’ or ‘exemplary’ secondary school teachers from different sociocultural settings (private denominational or public non-denominational schools, with multicultural or non-multicultural environments). The teachers replied to the following questions: How do teachers conceptualize the impartiality required in ERC? How is the ERC impartiality requirement put into practice in ERC teaching in secondary schools? The use of a thematic deductive approach (transversal analyses of non-participant observations in class and semi-directed teacher interviews) allows for the identification of existing connections between a theoretical analysis of the ERC program in the first case and the qualitative data gathered in the second case. Six primary conclusions emerging from these analyses are discussed. Proposing a critical reflection on the impartiality required in ERC, empirical results are clarified by theoretical analyses, which also aids in understanding the issue in fields where similar professional challenges are faced. The first outcome indicates that personal or professional variables in teachers have no influence on their understanding and implementation of the professional impartiality required in ERC. The second emphasizes the existence of polysemy and conceptual confusion concerning the terms neutrality, impartiality and objectivity, in teachers’ minds as well as in literature. In this regard, this dissertation suggests some useful paths of clarification. Next, based on a typology of impartiality developed in the first section, the third result explains that absolute or ‘axiological’ impartiality is generally rejected. The fourth conclusion reminds us that the idea of critical distance proves to be the foundation of the impartiality required in ERC. The fifth outcome demonstrates the differences between religious and ethical impartiality, with issues of religious indoctrination and the expression or non-expression of personal religious beliefs dominating the issue of impartiality. Finally, the sixth result summarizes the numerous difficulties associated with the requirement of intervening in accordance with program goals, as these goals refer to concepts that teachers find to be polysemous and vague.