Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / North Korean Nuclear Test, Korea, 2006

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'North Korean Nuclear Test, Korea, 2006'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 4 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'North Korean Nuclear Test, Korea, 2006.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "North Korean Nuclear Test, Korea, 2006"

1

LI, Nan. "China’s Evolving Policy towards North Korea: From Strategic Asset to Liability?" East Asian Policy 09, no. 04 (October 2017): 16–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1793930517000320.

Full text

Abstract:

China had historically considered North Korea as a strategic asset and provided substantial aid to it. After North Korea conducted nuclear test in 2006, China has begun to regard North Korea as a strategic liability and supported UN sanctions against it. This policy, however, is limited by China’s practical concern about peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and its strategic concern about a US policy of containment against China.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Zhao, Lian-Feng, Xiao-Bi Xie, Wei-Min Wang, Jin-Lai Hao, and Zhen-Xing Yao. "Seismological investigation of the 2016 January 6 North Korean underground nuclear test." Geophysical Journal International 206, no. 3 (June 27, 2016): 1487–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw239.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Seismology plays an important role in characterizing potential underground nuclear tests. Using broad-band digital seismic data from Northeast China, South Korea and Japan, we investigated the properties of the recent seismic event occurred in North Korea on 2016 January 6. Using a relative location method and choosing the previous 2006 explosion as the master event, the 2016 event was located within the North Korean nuclear test site, with its epicentre at latitude 41.3003°N and longitude 129.0678°E, approximately 900 m north and 500 m west of the previous event on 2013 February 12. Based on the error ellipse, the relocation uncertainty was approximately 70 m. Using the P/S spectral ratios, including Pg/Lg, Pn/Lg and Pn/Sn, as the discriminants, we identify the 2016 event as an explosion rather than an earthquake. The body-wave magnitude calculated from regional wave Lg is mb(Lg) equal to 4.7 ± 0.2. Adopting an empirical magnitude–yield relation, and assuming that the explosion is fully coupled and detonated at a normally scaled depth, we find that the seismic yield is about 4 kt, with the uncertainties allowing a range from 2 to 8 kt.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Kim, Andrew Eungi, and John Lie. "South Korea in 2006: Nuclear Standoff, Trade Talks, and Population Trends." Asian Survey 47, no. 1 (January 2007): 52–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.2007.47.1.52.

Full text

Abstract:

The nuclear test conducted by North Korea in October 2006 placed the Koreas at the center of world news. Prior to the nuclear test, free trade agreement talks with the United States dominated the year's domestic political discussions. Less newsworthy but potentially more profound are demographic trends, especially the rapid aging of the population, the record low fertility rate, and the rising number of intermarriages.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Zhao, L. F., X. B. Xie, W. M. Wang, and Z. X. Yao. "Regional Seismic Characteristics of the 9 October 2006 North Korean Nuclear Test." Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98, no. 6 (December 1, 2008): 2571–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0120080128.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Kim, Taehyun. "Engaging the Estranged: Reciprocity and Cooperation on the Korean Peninsula." Journal of East Asian Studies 3, no. 2 (August 2003): 169–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1598240800001338.

Full text

Abstract:

North Korea has become the focus of international attention once again. In October 2002 it admitted to a visiting U.S. envoy of having a clandestine nuclear program through uranium enrichment, which is a violation of, among other things, the bilateral agreement it signed with the United States eight years ago. In retaliation, the United States canceled shipment of heavy fuel oil to North Korea, that shipment being part of the agreement to compensate for North Korea's abandonment of its nuclear program. Since then, North Korea has astonished the world with a series of highly provocative moves: it restarted the nuclear facilities that it had frozen since 1994; expelled the inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); declared immediate withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT); and threatened to resume test-firing long-range missiles that it voluntarily stopped in 1998.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Kollias, Christos, Stephanos Papadamou, and Iacovos Psarianos. "Rogue State Behavior and Markets: the Financial Fallout of North Korean Nuclear Tests." Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 20, no. 2 (April 1, 2014): 267–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/peps-2013-0050.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractFinancial markets react to major political events. The three nuclear tests conducted by North Korea in 2006, 2009 and 2013 are a sober confirmation of its on-going nuclear weapons program with the concomitant potential security threat this poses for the stability of the greater region. This article examines how nine regional stock exchanges reacted to the three nuclear tests given their important security repercussions. The results, although not uniformed across all countries and markets, revealed a greater adverse effect in the case of the second of the three tests. Given that the first test was announced in advance and the third was conducted in the midst of an on-going military crisis, this finding suggests that following the initial shock an unanticipated event can cause, markets can evaluate and absorb in a more efficient manner the news.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ringbom, A., Klas Elmgren, Karin Lindh, Jenny Peterson, Theodore W. Bowyer, James C. Hayes, Justin I. McIntyre, Mark Panisko, and Richard Williams. "Measurements of radioxenon in ground level air in South Korea following the claimed nuclear test in North Korea on October 9, 2006." Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 282, no. 3 (July 25, 2009): 773–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0271-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Tibi, Rigobert. "Discrimination of Seismic Events (2006–2020) in North Korea Using P/Lg Amplitude Ratios from Regional Stations and a Bivariate Discriminant Function." Seismological Research Letters 92, no. 4 (March 24, 2021): 2399–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0220200432.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Two events of magnitude (mb) 3.6–3.8 occurred in southern North Korea (NK) on 27 June 2019 and 11 May 2020. Although these events were located ∼330–400 km from the known nuclear test site, the fact that they occurred within the territory of NK, a country with a recent history of underground nuclear tests, made them events of interest for the monitoring community. We used P/Lg ratios from regional stations to categorize seismic events that occurred in NK from 2006 to May 2020, including these two recent events, the six declared NK nuclear tests, and the cavity collapse and triggered earthquakes that followed the 3 September 2017 nuclear explosion. We were able to separate the cavity collapse from the population of nuclear explosions. However, based on P/Lg ratios, the distinction between the earthquakes and the cavity collapse is ambiguous. The performed discriminant analyses suggest that combining Pg/Lg and Pn/Lg ratios results in improved discriminant power compared with any of the ratio types alone. We used the two ratio types jointly in a quadratic discriminant function and successfully classified the six declared nuclear tests and the triggered earthquakes that followed the September 2017 explosion. Our analyses also confirm that the recent southern events of June 2019 and May 2020 are both tectonic earthquakes that occurred naturally.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Stocki, T. J., R. K. Ungar, R. D’Amours, M. Bean, K. Bock, I. Hoffman, E. Korpach, and A. Malo. "North Korean nuclear test of October 9th, 2006: The utilization of health Canada’s radionuclide monitoring network and environment Canada’s atmospheric transport and dispersion modelling." Radioprotection 46, no. 6 (2011): S529—S534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/20116803s.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Schlittenhardt, J., M. Canty, and I. Grünberg. "Satellite Earth Observations Support CTBT Monitoring: A Case Study of the Nuclear Test in North Korea of Oct. 9, 2006 and Comparison with Seismic Results." Pure and Applied Geophysics 167, no. 4-5 (January 22, 2010): 601–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00024-009-0036-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "North Korean Nuclear Test, Korea, 2006"

1

Horgen, Erik Herstad. "Nord-Koreas kjernefysiske prøvesprengning : utvikling og vurdering av rasjonalistiske forklaringer på hvorfor Nord-Korea prøvesprengte høsten 2006 /." Oslo : Statsvitenskap, Universitetet i Oslo, 2007. http://www.duo.uio.no/publ/statsvitenskap/2007/68250/Nord-Koreasxkjernefysiskexprxvesprengning.pdf.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Cho, Chanhyun. "North Korea's First 2006 Nuclear Test: Balancing against Threat?" Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/5601.

Full text

Abstract:

This thesis investigates the events leading up to and following the first North Korean nuclear test, which took place in 2006, in order to examine first, whether the test helped the North Korean regime survive, and second, how this unilateral action acted as a balance to the United States’ policy of oppression. The thesis will also attempt to shed some light on the validity of the Western International Relations (IR) theories by ascertaining the balance of threat and applying the notion of “two-level games” to the nuclear conundrum. Through the lens of these IR theories, the research described in the thesis addresses three smaller questions: (1) how did the nuclear test stabilize Pyongyang’s integrity as a balance to the threat of a potential American military attack?; (2) how was the test used as a bargaining mechanism to urge the Bush administration to shift away from its hostile stance and towards a policy of engagement?; and (3) how did the test influence the security environment of the Northeast Asian region? Finally, the thesis considers various reasons why the nuclear deadlock in which we currently find ourselves will not be resolved in the foreseeable future, and it suggests that resolution of the nuclear stalemate can only occur once comprehensive deal-making incentives between Washington and Pyongyang are adopted.
Graduate
0615
lomulos@yahoo.co.kr

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "North Korean Nuclear Test, Korea, 2006"

1

Pʻyŏnghwa, Chaedan Chʻangnip 2.-chunyŏn Kinyŏm Raundŭ Tʻeibŭl Tʻoronhoe (2006 Seoul Korea). Pukhan haek sirhŏm ihu Nam-buk kwanʼgye ŭi chŏnmang kwa taeŭng =: Responses and prospects on the relationship between South and North Korea after North Korean nuclear test. Sŏul-si: Pyŏnghwa Chaedan, 2006.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Pʻyŏnghwa Chaedan Chʻangnip 2-chunyŏn Kinyŏm Raundŭ Tʻeibŭl Tʻoronhoe (2006 Seoul, Korea). Pukhan haek sirhŏm ihu Nam-buk kwanʼgye ŭi chŏnmang kwa taeŭng =: Responses and prospects on the relationship between South and North Korea after North Korean nuclear test. Sŏul-si: Pyŏnghwa Chaedan, 2006.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

North Korea Issues: Nuclear Posturing, Saber Rattling and International Mischief. Nova Science Pub Inc, 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "North Korean Nuclear Test, Korea, 2006"

1

Haggard, Stephan, and Marcus Noland. "Conclusion." In Hard Target. Stanford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503600362.003.0008.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter looks back at our findings, measuring them against some of the analytic expectations established in our introduction in Chapter 1. It then asks two speculative questions. First, what if North Korea were to change? How might that affect the conclusions drawn here? Particular consideration is given to economic reform processes. Second, what if the major parties undertook different strategies with respect to North Korea? These questions permit us to engage in some comparisons with other relevant cases, most notably Iran, and to consider a new spate of diplomatic initiatives—including both sanctions and proposals for engagement—introduced in the wake of the fourth nuclear test in early 2016.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!