Academic literature on the topic 'Nuclear medicine Radiologic technologists'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Nuclear medicine Radiologic technologists.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Nuclear medicine Radiologic technologists"

1

Bernier, Marie-Odile, Neige Journy, Daphnee Villoing, Michele M. Doody, Bruce H. Alexander, Martha S. Linet, and Cari M. Kitahara. "Cataract Risk in a Cohort of U.S. Radiologic Technologists Performing Nuclear Medicine Procedures." Radiology 286, no. 2 (February 2018): 592–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170683.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Villoing, Daphnée, David Borrego, Dale L. Preston, Bruce H. Alexander, André Rose, Mark Salasky, Martha S. Linet, Choonsik Lee, and Cari M. Kitahara. "Trends in Occupational Radiation Doses for U.S. Radiologic Technologists Performing General Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Procedures, 1980–2015." Radiology 300, no. 3 (September 2021): 605–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021204501.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bhatti, Parveen, Dale L. Preston, Michele Morin Doody, Michael Hauptmann, Diane Kampa, Bruce H. Alexander, Dayton Petibone, et al. "Retrospective Biodosimetry among United States Radiologic Technologists." Radiation Research 167, no. 6 (June 2007): 727–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/rr0894.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gulliver, Nick, and Peter Hogg. "Role of nuclear medicine technologists." Nuclear Medicine Communications 32, no. 11 (November 2011): 977–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0b013e328348cd7d.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Bernier, Marie Odile, Michele M. Doody, Miriam E. Van Dyke, Daphné Villoing, Bruce H. Alexander, Martha S. Linet, and Cari M. Kitahara. "Work history and radioprotection practices in relation to cancer incidence and mortality in US radiologic technologists performing nuclear medicine procedures." Occupational and Environmental Medicine 75, no. 8 (May 2, 2018): 533–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104559.

Full text
Abstract:
IntroductionTechnologists working in nuclear medicine (NM) are exposed to higher radiation doses than most other occupationally exposed populations. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of cancer in NM technologists in relation to work history, procedures performed and radioprotection practices.MethodsFrom the US Radiologic Technologists cohort study, 72 755 radiologic technologists who completed a 2003–2005 questionnaire were followed for cancer mortality through 31 December 2012 and for cancer incidence through completion of a questionnaire in 2012–2013. Multivariable-adjusted models were used to estimate HRs for total cancer incidence and mortality by history of ever performing NM procedures and frequency of performing specific diagnostic or therapeutic NM procedures and associated radiation protection measures by decade.ResultsDuring follow-up (mean=7.5 years), 960 incident cancers and 425 cancer deaths were reported among the 22 360 technologists who worked with NM procedures. We observed no increased risk of cancer incidence (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.04) or death (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.19) among workers who ever performed NM procedures. HRs for cancer incidence but not mortality were higher for technologists who began performing therapeutic procedures in 1960 and later compared with the 1950s. Frequency of performing diagnostic or therapeutic NM procedures and use of radioprotection measures were not consistently associated with cancer risk. No clear associations were observed for specific cancers, but results were based on small numbers.ConclusionCancer incidence and mortality were not associated with NM work history practices, including greater frequency of procedures performed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Anderson, D., W. Hubble, B. A. Press, S. K. Hall, A. D. Michels, R. Koenen, and A. W. Vespie. "The 2011 Nuclear Medicine Technology Job Analysis Project of the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists." Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology 38, no. 4 (November 15, 2010): 205–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.110.081596.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ballani, Nasser S., and Ibrahim Sukkar. "Medical imaging physics teaching to radiologic technologists in Kuwait." Radiography 11, no. 1 (February 2005): 67–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2004.07.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Covens, Peter, Danielle Berus, Vicky Caveliers, Lara Struelens, and Dirk Verellen. "Skin contamination of nuclear medicine technologists." Nuclear Medicine Communications 33, no. 10 (October 2012): 1024–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0b013e32835674d9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Alashban, Yazeed, and Nasser Shubayr. "OCCUPATIONAL DOSE ASSESSMENT FOR NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND RADIOTHERAPY TECHNOLOGISTS IN SAUDI ARABIA." Radiation Protection Dosimetry 195, no. 1 (June 2021): 50–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab112.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This study estimated the occupational radiation dose received by nuclear medicine and radiotherapy technologists in Saudi Arabia. A retrospective analysis of personal dosemetry data of 1243 nuclear medicine and radiotherapy technologists from 28 medical centers across Saudi Arabia from 2015 to 2019 was conducted. Thermoluminescent dosemeters were employed to monitor the occupational radiation dose. For the study period, the average annual values for nuclear medicine and radiotherapy technologists were found to be 1.22 mSv (SD = 1.00 mSv) and 0.73 mSv (SD = 0.40 mSv) for Hp(10) and 1.23 mSv (SD = 1.07 mSv) and 0.72 mSv (SD = 0.41 mSv) for Hp(0.07), respectively. The work routines of nuclear medicine technologists cause them to be exposed to higher radiation doses than radiotherapy technologists. The occupational doses for all technologists were found to be below the annual dose limits, which indicates satisfactory working conditions in terms of radiation protection.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Linet, Martha S., Michael Hauptmann, D. Michal Freedman, Bruce H. Alexander, Jeremy Miller, Alice J. Sigurdson, and Michele Morin Doody. "Interventional radiography and mortality risks in U.S. radiologic technologists." Pediatric Radiology 36, S2 (July 22, 2006): 113–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0224-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Nuclear medicine Radiologic technologists"

1

Passmore, Gregory. "The effects of Gowin's vee heuristic diagraming and concept mapping on meaningful learning in the radiation science classroom and laboratory /." free to MU campus, to others for purchase, 1996. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/mo/fullcit?p9737850.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Housenick-Lee, Megan. "Social-Ecological Factors Affecting Patient Shield Use Among Radiologic and Computed Tomography Technologists." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2017. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3321.

Full text
Abstract:
Medical radiation is estimated to contribute to over 200,000 deaths annually. Recent increases in the use of radiation-producing medical imaging examinations have led to increasing cumulative radiation dose to the general public. Multiple measures have been taken to address this alarming trend, including physician education, technologist education on dose reduction, and equipment-facilitated dose reduction techniques. Shield use can reduce the primary beam by up to 95%. Medical imaging technologists are the primary individuals responsible for applying shielding during an examination. Currently, literature shows that technologists are not shielding individuals as often as they should. After pilot testing, medical imaging technologists were recruited via email to participate in a national cross-sectional survey in September 2017. The survey contained items related to technologists’ demographics, shielding behaviors, and attitudes and beliefs measured at four social-ecological levels – intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, and community. The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) provided a list of technologists’ email addresses from their directory. One thousand six-hundred and sixty-one email notifications were sent out in the summer of 2017. Of those, 218 technologists (13%) completed the survey. Among technologists who considered their primary modality to be computed tomography (CT), organizational level factors were a positive significant predictor of shielding behavior. None of the four levels were significant in predicting shielding behavior among diagnostic radiological technologists (x-ray). Individual factors were significantly correlated to shielding behavior among radiologic technologists in the intrapersonal, organizational, and community levels. Study results indicated that interventions implemented at the organizational level may be most effective in increasing shield use among CT technologists. Additional research is needed to better understand factors affecting shield use among medical imaging technologists.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Philotheou, Geraldine Merle. "Distance assisted training for nuclear medicine technologists in anglophone sub-Saharan Africa." Thesis, Peninsula Technikon, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/1553.

Full text
Abstract:
Dissertation (MTech (radiography))—Peninsula Technikon, Cape Town, 2003
Five of the seventeen countries with Nuclear Medicine facilities in Africa have training programmes for Nuclear Medicine Technologists (NMT's). Four of the countries are in Northern Africa (Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and Egypt) and only one in Southern Africa (South Africa). The training programmes vary from country to country and therefore there is no common basis to facilitate regional co-operation. Nuclear Medicine Technologists working in sub-Saharan countries do not have formal training in Nuclear Medicine and have mostly been recruited from related fields of Radiological Technology. A number of NMT's in these centres have enjoyed International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) fellowship training in other countries or have attended regional training courses. Knowledge and skills, learned in well established Nuclear Medicine departments with supportive infrastructure, are on the whole difficult to transfer to a local situation without such support. Because of the nature of the specialty the numbers required for training are small and it would therefore not be cost-effective for Higher Education Institutions in these countries to set up training programmes. There is also a lack of expertise in this field in Africa. Training was initially supported outside the countries with loss of personnel to the departments and in many instances loss of manpower as these trainees leave their countries and do not return. Under an IAEA/African Regional Co-operative Agreement (AFRA) project; "Establishing a Regional Capability in Nuclear Medicine", the following related to training of NMT's: 1. Harmonisation of training programmes for Nuclear Medicine Technologists in AFRA countries 2. Assess the feasibility of running a Distance Assisted Training (DAT) programme for Nuclear Medicine Technologists It was hoped that in this way, full use could be made of available expertise and facilities in the region, the cost of training could be reduced and the standard of patient health care improved.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Forsgren, Mikael. "The Non-Invasive Liver Biopsy : Determining Hepatic Function in Diffuse and Focal LiverDisease." Doctoral thesis, Linköpings universitet, Avdelningen för radiologiska vetenskaper, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-136545.

Full text
Abstract:
The liver is one of the largest organs within the human body and it handles many vital tasks such as nutrient processing, toxin removal, and synthesis of important proteins. The number of people suffering from chronic liver disease is on the rise, likely due to the present ‘western’ lifestyle. As disease develops in the liver there are pathophysiological manifestations within the liver parenchyma that are both common and important to monitor. These manifestations include inflammation, fatty infiltration (steatosis), excessive scar tissue formation (fibrosis and cirrhosis), and iron loading. Importantly, as the disease progresses there is concurrent loss of liver function. Furthermore, postoperative liver function insufficiency is an important concern when planning surgical treatment of the liver, because it is associated with both morbidity and mortality. Liver function can also be hampered due to drug-induced injuries, an important aspect to consider in drug-development. Currently, an invasive liver needle biopsy is required to determine the aetiology and to stage or grade the pathophysiological manifestations. There are important limitations with the biopsy, which include, risk of serious complications, mortality, morbidity, inter- and intra-observer variability, sampling error, and sampling variability. Cleary, it would be beneficial to be able investigate the pathophysiological manifestations accurately, non-invasively, and on regional level. Current available laboratory liver function blood panels are typically insufficient and often only indicate damage at a late stage. Thus, it would be beneficial to have access to biomarkers that are both sensitive and responds to early changes in liver function in both clinical settings and for the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies. The main aim of this thesis was to develop and evaluate methods that can be used for a ‘non-invasive liver biopsy’ using magnetic resonance (MR). We also aimed to develop sensitive methods for measure liver function based on gadoxetate-enhanced MR imaging (MRI). The presented work is primarily based on a prospective study on c. 100 patients suffering from chronic liver disease of varying aetiologies recruited due to elevated liver enzyme levels, without clear signs of decompensated cirrhosis. Our results show that the commonly used liver fat cut-off for diagnosing steatosis should be lowered from 5% to 3% when using MR proton-density fat fraction (PDFF). We also show that MR elastography (MRE) is superior in staging fibrosis. Finally we presented a framework for quantifying liver function based on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI. The method is based on clinical images and a clinical approved contrast agent (gadoxetate). The framework consists of; state-of the-art image reconstruction and correction methods, a mathematical model, and a precise model parametrization method. The model was developed and validated on healthy subjects. Thereafter the model was found applicable on the chronic liver disease cohort as well as validated using gadoxetate levels in biopsy samples and blood samples. The liver function parameters correlated with clinical markers for liver function and liver fibrosis (used as a surrogate marker for liver function). In summary, it should be possible to perform a non-invasive liver biopsy using: MRI-PDFF for liver fat and iron loading, MRE for liver fibrosis and possibly also inflammation, and measure liver function using the presented framework for analysing gadoxetate-enhanced MRI. With the exception of an MREtransducer no additional hardware is required on the MR scanner. The liver function method is likely to be useful both in a clinical setting and in pharmaceutical trials.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ullman, Gustaf. "Quantifying image quality in diagnostic radiology using simulation of the imaging system and model observers." Doctoral thesis, Linköping : Department of Medicine and Health, Linköping University, 2008. http://www.bibl.liu.se/liupubl/disp/disp2008/med1050s.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Nuclear medicine Radiologic technologists"

1

Mantel, Eleanor S., 1972- author, Basso, Danny A., 1967- author, Thomas Kathy S. author, Kerr Bryan R. author, and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, eds. Quick-reference protocol manual for nuclear medicine technologists. Reston, VA: Published by Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

R, Bernier Donald, and Langan James K. 1934-, eds. Nuclear medicine and PET: Technology and techniques. 5th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

J, Lloyd Peter. Quality assurance workbook for radiographers & radiological technologists. Geneva: Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Technology, Blood Safety and Clinical Technology, Health Technology and Pharmaceuticals, World Health Organization, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bonnick, Sydney Lou. Bone densitometry for technologists. 2nd ed. Totowa, N.J: Humana Press, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ann, Lewis Lori, ed. Bone densitometry for technologists. Totowa, N.J: Humana Press, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Moniuszko, Andrzej. Nuclear Medicine Technology Study Guide: A Technologist’s Review for Passing Board Exams. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

McClelland, Ian R. X-ray equipment maintenance and repairs workbook for radiographers & radiological technologists. Geneva: Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Technology, Essential Health Technologies, Health Technology and Pharmaceuticals, World Health Organization, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M., Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx, Jan L. M. A. Gielen, and Johannes Zwerver, eds. Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Review of nuclear medicine technology. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: Society of Nuclear Medicine, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Steves, Ann M. Review of nuclear medicine technology. New York, NY: Society of Nuclear Medicine, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Nuclear medicine Radiologic technologists"

1

Gielen, Jan L. M. A., and P. Van Dyck. "Radiologic Imaging Techniques." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 9–23. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Noordzij, Walter, and Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans. "Nuclear Medicine Imaging Techniques." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 25–48. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Van Goethem, J. W. M., M. Faure, C. Venstermans, L. van den Hauwe, F. De Belder, and Paul M. Parizel. "Radiologic Imaging of Spine Injuries." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 203–17. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Barendregt, Anouk Marinke, and Mario Maas. "Radiologic Imaging of Chest Injuries." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 257–73. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Van Dyck, Pieter, Damien Desbuquoit, Jan L. M. A. Gielen, and Paul M. Parizel. "Radiologic Imaging of Knee Injuries." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 641–67. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_29.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ahmad Saad, Fathinul Fikri, Mohammad Nazri Md Shah, and Abdul Jalil Nordin. "Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Spine Injuries." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 219–42. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Eshuis, S. A. "Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Shoulder Injuries." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 375–87. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_18.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hirschmann, Michael T., Flavio Forrer, Enrique Testa, and Helmut Rasch. "Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Knee Injuries." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 669–85. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_30.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Horisberger, Monika, André Leumann, Helmut Rasch, and Michael T. Hirschmann. "Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Ankle Injuries." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 803–16. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_36.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Pereira Arias-Bouda, Lenka M., and Frits Smit. "Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Foot Injuries." In Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries, 853–68. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46491-5_39.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Nuclear medicine Radiologic technologists"

1

Kitahara, Cari, Michele Doody, Miriam Van Dyke, Vladimir Drozdovitch, Steven Simon, Hyeyeun Lim, Dale Preston, et al. "O10-4 Ionizing radiation exposure and risks of cancer and circulatory disease in technologists performing nuclear medicine procedures." In Occupational Health: Think Globally, Act Locally, EPICOH 2016, September 4–7, 2016, Barcelona, Spain. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103951.55.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dash, S., A. Goel, and S. Sogani. "Incremental Role of 18F-FDG PET with contrast enhanced CT (PET-CECT) in detection of recurrence of carcinoma cervix." In 16th Annual International Conference RGCON. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd., 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1685260.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose: To evaluate the role of 18F-FDG PET with contrast enhanced CT (PET-CECT) in early detection of recurrence in follow up patients of carcinoma cervix. Methods: Patients with histopathologically proven carcinoma cervix who underwent chemotherapy, radiotherapy and/or surgery and on follow up were recruited in the study. Fifty-two patients underwent 18F-FDG PET-CECT for detection of recurrence. The median age was 51.5 (average = 53.4) years. PET-CECT studies were evaluated and analyzed separately by an experienced nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist independently. The physicians were blinded for the patient history. PET-CECT results were validated with histopathological correlation, conventional radiologic imaging/follow up PET-CECT study and clinical follow up. Results: Out of 52 patients, 34 patients were reported as positive for recurrence, 17 of these were having active local recurrence and 31 patients had regional lymph nodal metastases, 14 patients had distant metastases (out of them 6 patients had distant lymph node metastases, 6 had pulmonary metastases, 4 had skeletal metastases and two had liver metastases). Remaining 18 patients were reported as negative for recurrence. The lung was the most common site for distant metastasis. Patient were then further evaluated based on histopathological correlation, conventional radiologic imaging and follow up PET-CECT scan and five were found to be false positive and one patient was identified as false negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were derived to be 96.7%, 77.3%, 85.3% and 94.4%, respectively. Accuracy was calculated to be 88.5%. Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET-CECT is a very useful non-invasive modality for the early detection of recurrence and metastatic workup in patients with carcinoma cervix with a very high sensitivity and negative predictive value. It is also useful in targeting biopsy sites in suspected cases of recurrence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography