To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege.
Journal articles on the topic 'Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 38 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Heger, Martin. "Von der Konstitutionalisierung von Nulla poena, nullum crimen sine lege in Art. 116 WRV (1919) zu dessen Umkehrung in ein Nullum crimen sine poenadurch das NS-Regime." Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica 20, no. 2 (2021): 9–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/mhi.2021.20.02.01.
Full textAbstract:
The principle of Legality (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege) is the most fundamental principle of German criminal code since it was codified in the Bavarian Criminal Code 1813 for the first time. With the Foundation of the German Empire in 1871 it became an integral part of the new German Penal Code Reichsstrafgesetzbuch). It was constitutionalized in 1919 as a fundamental right with Art. 116 of the Weimar Constitution. It was unchallenged till the Nazi regime came to power. Not within the Empowerment Act but with other legal measures resulting from the burning of the Parliament (”Reichstagsbrand”) on 28 February 1933 till 1935 on, the Nazi regime changed the principle step by step from nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege to nullum crimen sine poena. They made Analogy in disfavor of the accused person possible and they stated criminal offences with retroactivity. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court of Justice (Reichsgericht) accepted the new provisions and used it as a basis for its sentences. After WW II the allies nullified the Nazi provisions. With Art. 103 § 2 of the new (West-)German constitution from 1949 nulla poena sine lege has been constitutionalized again. The Paper deals with that development with a special focus on the role of the Reichsgericht as the highest body of judges, who were trained in the times before the Nazis came to power.
2
Gacka, Patryk. "‘NULLUM CRIMEN, NULLA POENA SINE LEGE’ A ZBRODNIE MIĘDZYNARODOWE." Zeszyty Prawnicze 21, no. 1 (March 13, 2021): 159–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2021.21.1.06.
Full textAbstract:
Artykuł ma na celu podjęcie problemu moralnej dostępności prawa w zestawieniu ze standardem nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege możliwym do wywiedzenia z orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka oraz pomocniczo także innych sądów i trybunałów w sprawach dotyczących przewidywalności bezprawnego i karalnego charakteru czynów składających się na zbrodnie międzynarodowe. Dwa pytania wyznaczają zakres prowadzonych analiz. Po pierwsze, analizie poddane zostaje to, do jakiego stopnia karalność zbrodni międzynarodowych była i jest przewidywalna dla zwykłego adresata normy karnoprawnej. Po drugie zaś, artykuł podejmuje kwestię, w jakim zakresie uzasadnione jest powoływanie się na argument z tzw. dostępności moralnej komunikatu kryminalizacyjnego w celu zrekompensowania pewnych niedociągnięć formalnych charakterystycznych dla legislacji międzynarodowej. Badane są ponadto poszczególne kryteria zasady legalizmu w zestawieniu ze zbrodniami międzynarodowymi. Szerszemu omówieniu poddano także trzy rozpatrywane przez ETPC sprawy (Kononov, Vasiliauskas oraz Korbely) odnoszące się kolejno do zbrodni wojennych, zbrodni ludobójstwa oraz zbrodni przeciwko ludzkości.
3
Mokhtar, A. "Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege: Aspects and Prospects." Statute Law Review 26, no. 1 (February 1, 2005): 41–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmi005.
Full text
4
Presnyakov, M. V. "Wrongfulness of Disciplinary Misconduct in the Public Service and the Principle of “nulla poena sine lege”." Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya 22, no. 6 (2022): 16–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/1682-2358-2022-6-16-23.
Full textAbstract:
Peculiarities of a disciplinary misconduct as the actual basis for disciplinary responsibility are considered. The author draws attention to the fact that a disciplinary misconduct, unlike an offense, is usually not formalized, therefore, the sign of wrongfulness is not determinative for it. It is proved that in relation to disciplinary misconduct, the application of the principle of “nullum crimen sine lege” (there is no crime without law) is significantly limited.
5
Puspito, Beni, and Ali Masyhar. "Dynamics of Legality Principles in Indonesian National Criminal Law Reform." Journal of Law and Legal Reform 4, no. 1 (January 22, 2023): 129–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i1.64078.
Full textAbstract:
This study aims to find out the dynamics of the legality principle in the renewal of criminal law laws in Indonesia. The type of research used is doctrinal research. All data obtained were analyzed qualitatively juridically. This study examines and examines secondary data about the dynamics of the legality principle in reforming criminal law laws in Indonesia. The principle of legality according to Paul Johan Anslem von Feuerbach is nulla poena sine lege; nulla poena sine crimine; nullum crimen sine poena legali. These three phrases then become the adage Nullum delictum, nulla poena sine praevia legi poenali, which means that no act can be punished except for the strength of the criminal rules in the legislation that existed before the act was committed. The results of this studystates that if an act does not meet the formulation of an offense in a written law, the judge can impose a sentence if the act is considered disgraceful, contrary to justice and other social norms in people's lives. So that implicitly the criminal law in Indonesia has recognized the teaching of material lawlessness in a positive function.
6
Endo, Guillaume. "NULLUM CRIMEN NULLA POENA SINE LEGE PRINCIPLE AND THE ICTY AND ICTR." Revue québécoise de droit international 15, no. 1 (2002): 205. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1069418ar.
Full text
7
Jeutner, Valentin. "Pirates in Suits: Carl Schmitt, ‘Ordinary Businessmen’ and Crimes of Aggression." Nordic Journal of International Law 88, no. 3 (August 29, 2019): 459–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08803004.
Full textAbstract:
The article critically appraises Carl Schmitt’s 1945 expert opinion on The International Crime of the War of Aggression and the Principle ‘nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege’. Each element of Carl Schmitt’s expert opinion is subjected to close scrutiny and contextualised with references, where appropriate, to the icc’s recently acquired jurisdiction to try crimes of aggression. It is shown that Schmitt’s legal arguments are on the whole tenable but that the expert opinion’s assumptions about the position of the ability of ‘ordinary’ citizens to assess their own actions are very problematic.
8
Kuhli, Milan. "Die Weimarer Reichsverfassung und das Verbot rückwirkender Strafverschärfung." Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica 20, no. 2 (2021): 45–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/mhi.2021.20.02.04.
Full textAbstract:
The principle “nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege” is one of the core principles of German criminal law and constitutional law. However, the history of this principle is quite varied. This article will focus on an essential part of this history, namely on the version of this principle in the Weimar Constitution of 1919. It will be shown that the principle of legality of criminal law was indeed expressed in that constitution, but that the exact scope of application of this constitutional principle was quite unclear. In this regard, it was uncertain whether the Weimar Constitution also prohibited the retroactive application of criminal laws to those cases for which a more lenient penalty was provided at the time of the offense. This ambiguity of the Weimar Constitution finally became apparent in 1933 in the so-called Reichstagsbrandprozess (Reichstag fire trial). The issue in these criminal proceedings was whether the burning of the parliament building in Berlin (February 27, 1933) was punishable by death, although this sanction was not provided at the time the crime was committed. In this essay, it will be shown that the National Socialists had to go to considerable effort to be able to ignore prohibitions on retroactivity. This undermining of the principle “nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege” forms an important example of the willingness of the legislature to negate essential protective principles of law in the Third Reich.
9
Hollán, Miklós. "Közigazgatási büntetőjog és alapjogi garanciák." Pro Publico Bono – Magyar Közigazgatás 8, no. 3 (2020): 58–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.32575/ppb.2020.3.4.
Full textAbstract:
A tanulmány azt vizsgálja, hogy a nullum crimen et nulla poena sine lege alapelv miképpen érvényesül a közigazgatási szankciók tekintetében. A szerző áttekinti az Európai Emberi Jogi Bíróság, az Európai Unió Bírósága, illetve az Alkotmánybíróság válogatott döntéseit. Különös figyelmet fordít a 30/2014. (IX. 30.) AB határozatra, amely lényeges fordulatot hozott az ítélkezési gyakorlatban. A testület ugyanis ebben a döntésében kifejezetten kiterjesztette az Alaptörvény XXVIII. cikk (4) bekezdésében biztosított garancia hatályát a közigazgatási szankciókra, miközben azonban annak védelmi szintjét ezekre nézve lecsökkentette a klasszikus büntetőjoghoz képest.
10
Gacka, Patryk. "Klauzula norymberska siedemdziesiąt lat później." Roczniki Nauk Prawnych 30, no. 4 (May 29, 2021): 167–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rnp20304-10.
Full textAbstract:
W artykule analizie poddana została wyrażona w art. 7 ust. 2 EKPC, art. 15 ust. 2 MPPOiP oraz art. 49 ust. 2 KPP klauzula norymberska. W założeniu jej twórców miała ona za zadanie źródłowo uszczegółowić zakres zasady legalizmu, pełniąc przy tym funkcję swoistej „tarczy” przed potencjalnymi zarzutami naruszenia zasady nullum crimen nulla poena sine lege przez powojenne procesy karne zbrodniarzy wojennych. W artykule wykazano, iż wbrew formułowanym niekiedy twierdzeniom, nie stanowi ona jednak wyjątku od zasady lex retro non agit, lecz konstytuuje autonomiczny pod względem źródeł zakazów karnych standard wyrażany przez zasadę nullum crimen sine iure. W pracy zbadano ponadto stosowalność ogólnych zasad prawa uznanych przez społeczność międzynarodową w kontekście odpowiedzialności karnej, a także wykazano praktyczną nieoperatywność klauzuli norymberskiej. Krytycznej analizie poddano także konstrukcję klauzuli norymberskiej. Artykuł wykazuje jej merytoryczną i logiczną wadliwość. W podsumowaniu, autor sugeruje natomiast zastąpienie klauzuli norymberskiej klauzulą prawa natury.
11
Luchtman, Michiel. "Principles of European Criminal Law: Jurisdiction, Choice of Forum, and the Legality Principle in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice." European Review of Private Law 20, Issue 2 (April 1, 2012): 347–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2012022.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: Developments in the European Union (EU) in the area of prosecution of transnational crime are tempestuous. Yet the debate on the role of the principles of criminal law in this area of the law is still in its infancy. This contribution explores the role of the legality principle (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege) in relation to choice of forum in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice (AFSJ). To what extent is the legality principle applicable in transnational cases? What must one think of current developments in light of this principle? Is the principle a factor of relevance for the European legislator and for the judiciary? It is advocated in this contribution that the legality principle of Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR) needs to be adapted to its transnational setting and that this must have implications for the state of play in European criminal law. Résumé: En matière de poursuite des délits transnationaux, les développements au sein de l´Union européenne sont tumultueux. Pourtantle débat sur le rôle des principes de droit pénal dans ce domaine du droit en est encore à ses débuts. La présente contribution explore le rôle du principe de légalité (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege) en relation avec le choix du for dans l´Espace de Liberté, Sécurité et Justice. Jusqu´où s´applique le principe de légalité aux cas transnationaux? Que doit-on penser des développements actuels à la lumière de ce principe? Le principe est-il un facteur de pertinence pour le législateur européeen? Et pour le pouvoir judiciaire? La présente contribution défend le point de vue selon lequel le principe de légalité de l´article 49 de la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux a besoin d´être adapté à son cadre transnational et cela doit avoir des implications sur l´état du droit pénal européen.
12
Timoera, Dwi Afrimeti. "ASAS LEGALITAS DALAM DOKTRIN HUKUM INDONESIA: PRINSIP DAN PENERAPAN." Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi 10, no. 2 (April 8, 2011): 67–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.21009/jimd.v10i2.2298.
Full textAbstract:
The principle of legality is a principle which determines that no act which is prohibited and punishable by criminal if not determined in advance in legislation. This principle is usually known as nullum delictum nulla poena sine praevia lege (no offense, no crime without law first. There are four principles of legality that is, the lex scripta (written law), lex chert (which includes criminal law), nonretroaktif (rule not retroactive) and analogy.
13
Gandulfo R, Eduardo. "¿Qué queda del Principio de Nullum Crimen Nulla Poena sine Lege? Un enfoque desde la argumentación jurídica." Política criminal 4, no. 8 (December 2009): 292–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992009000200002.
Full text
14
Sleeckx, Annick, Charlotte Thijssen, and Cyril-Igor Grigorieff. "Attacks Against Aviation: Beijing Convention and Protocol Now in Force." Air and Space Law 44, Issue 2 (April 1, 2019): 125–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/aila2019010.
Full textAbstract:
The fight back against modern threats to civil aviation has now materialized since the entry into force in 2018 of both the 2010 Beijing Convention on the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Relating to International Civil Aviation and the 2010 Beijing Protocol Supplementary to the Convention on Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft. These two instruments share the same goal but must be distinguished clearly. The 2010 Protocol supplements the 1970 Hague Convention and was drafted mostly to address hijacking scenarios; whereas the 2010 Convention is a recast of the 1971 Montreal Convention and its 1988 Protocol regarding other forms of violence against aircraft and airport facilities. This article will aim to shed some light on selected key improvements made by these recent instruments. Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege
15
Iwański, Maciej. "INTERNATIONAL LAW STANDARDS REGARDING SUBSTANTIVE PETTY OFFENCES LAW." Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law 59, no. 3 (December 29, 2021): 45–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.59.3.3.
Full textAbstract:
This article attempts to identify and analyse, in the light of the provisions of the acts of international law, the following issues belonging to the substantive part of the law on petty offences: the general problem of criminalization in petty offenses law and; the question of the criminal nature of the law of petty offenses, and thus the application of individual provisions to it and the resulting guarantees appropriate to that law; the application of the principle of guilt on the basis of the analysed regulations as a premise for assigning liability; the principle of ne bis in idem; the principle of nullum crimen nulla poena sine lege, especially in so far as it derives from the principle of lex mitior retro agit.
16
Hartl, Friedrich. "Volker Krey, Keine Strafe ohne Gesetz. Einführung in die Dogmengeschichte des Satzes „nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege“." Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung 102, no. 1 (August 1, 1985): 427–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.7767/zrgga.1985.102.1.427.
Full text
17
Alkhseilat, Abdullah, Tareq Al-Billeh, and Naji Alwerikat. "THE LEGAL CONTROLS FOR THE INDECENT ASSAULT OFFENSE USING ELECTRONIC MEANS BY JORDANIAN LEGISLATION." Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University 57, no. 6 (December 30, 2022): 1190–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.57.6.104.
Full textAbstract:
The significant progress in the field of information technology has reduced the distances between individuals and created a digital society that has effectively contributed to the development of societies and made the world more flexible and simple; however, the rapid growth of information technology has been met with negative attitudes by the misuse of this technology, including the infringement of the protection rights of individuals by committing various cyber offenses, including the offense of indecent assault using electronic means, accordingly, the Jordanian Penal Law will deal with this crime in consultation with the Jordanian Cybercrime Law. Therefore, the applied approach was followed in this study. As a result, it came out with several results and recommendations, the most important of which is the need for the Jordanian legislators to intervene with a legal text that defines acts and forms of conduct in the small offense of indecent assault and sets its punishment to prevent conflict and by the principle of "nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege."
18
Hajam, Mohamed. "Création et compétences du Tribunal pénal international pour l'ex-Yougoslavie." Études internationales 26, no. 3 (April 12, 2005): 503–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/703489ar.
Full textAbstract:
The Security Council adopted Resolution 808 on February 22, 1993. This resolution created an international tribunal to judge people presumed responsible for grave breaches of humanitarian law committed on the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991. The tribunal's status is defined by Resolution 827, whereby its jurisdiction covers all serious violations committed by individuals in the former Yugoslavia. The principle nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege is fully respected. The tribunal's effectiveness, however, depends on the rulings the judges will hand down and on support from all states. Creating the ICT has been deemed a very important step. By judging criminals, the tribunal not only hopes to introduce the idea of justice into a sphere of international life dominated by power relationships, but also wishes especially to dampen the victors' feeling of impunity. AU of this requires one thing : the goodwill of the states so that this tribunal may carry out its task.
19
Moura, Bruno de Oliveira. "O nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege à luz do artigo 7.º da Convenção Europeia dos Direitos do Homem*." Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais 7, no. 2 (2023): 371–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n2p371-394.
Full textAbstract:
The principle that only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty is a modern civilizational achievement of different societies affiliated with the legal culture of civil law. However, its real meaning and effective scope are put to the test in the field of International Criminal Law, which is heavily influenced by common law traditions. This article seeks to analyze the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on this matter. The aim is to highlight not only points of approximation or convergence with the most current approach to that guarantee within the framework of continental law, but also points of distancing or fragility, especially oscillations regarding the requirements of the “quality of law”.
20
Վարդապետյան, Աննա, and Լալա Բեգոյան. "ՀԱՆՑԱԳՈՐԾՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՆԵՐԻ ՈՐԱԿՄԱՆ ԱՌԱՆՁՆԱՀԱՏԿՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՆԵՐԸ ԳՆԱՀԱՏՈՂԱԿԱՆ ՀԱՍԿԱՑՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՆԵՐ (ՀԱՏԿԱՆԻՇՆԵՐ) ՊԱՐՈՒՆԱԿՈՂ ՀԱՆՑԱԿԱԶՄԵՐՈՒՄ (ՀՀ ԳՈՐԾՈՂ ՔՐԵԱԿԱՆ ՕՐԵՆՍԳՐՔԻ ԵՎ ՆՈՐ ՕՐԵՆՍԳՐՔԻ ՀԱՄԵՄԱՏԱԿԱՆ ՎԵՐԼՈՒԾՈՒԹՅՈՒՆ)." State and Law 91 (February 15, 2022): 23–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.46991/sl/2021.91.023.
Full textAbstract:
Հանցավորության դեմ պայքարի արդյունավետությունը և այդ գործընթացի օրինականությունը պայմանավորված են քրեական օրենսգրքի բովանդակությամբ: Ոչ ոք չի կարող ենթարկվել քրեական պատասխանատվության և պատժի այլ կերպ, քան օրենքով ուղղակիորեն նախատեսված դեպքերում, կարգով և չափով (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege): Օրենսդրի խնդիրն է հնարավորինս հստակ և որոշակի սահմանել հանցավոր համարվող արարքը և դրա համար նախատեսվող պատիժը, քանի որ անձը չի կարող ենթարկվել քրեական պատասխանատվության այնպիսի արարքի համար, որն իրավական որոշակիության չափանիշին բավարարող եղանակով նախատեսված չէ գործող օրենքով: Այնուհանդերձ, ինչպես գործող քրեական օրենսգրքի, այնպես էլ Նոր օրենսգրքի (ստորագրվել է 27․05․2021թ․-ին, ուժի մեջ է մտնելու 01․07․2022թ․-ին) մի շարք հանցակազմերում օգտագործված են մեծ թվով գնահատողական հասկացություններ (հատկանիշներ): Հետևաբար, սույն աշխատանքի շրջանակներում համակարգային ուսումնասիրության ենք ենթարկել ինչպես գործող քրեական օրենսգրքում, այնպես էլ քրեական Նոր օրենսգրքում օգտագործվող գնահատողական հասկացությունները (հատկանիշները) և վերհանել դրանց մեկնաբանման և դրա հիման վրա հանցագործությունների որակման գործընթացում առաջացող խնդիրները: Վերլուծության համակարգվածությունն ապահովելու նպատակով` ուսումնասիրության ենք ենթարկել հանցակազմերի օբյեկտիվ և սուբյեկտիվ կողմերի հատկանիշներում տեղ գտած գնահատողական հասկացությունները:
21
Rosanò, Alessandro. "Book Review: Legality in Europe: On the Principle Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege in EU law and Under the ECHR." New Journal of European Criminal Law 10, no. 4 (October 14, 2019): 423–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2032284419881574.
Full text
22
Ginter, Carri, and Anneli Soo. "The ‘Public Order’ Parachute in Combating Racism and Xenophobia." Juridica International 31 (October 25, 2022): 48–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/ji.2022.31.02.
Full textAbstract:
The European Commission has initiated infringement proceedings against virtually half of the Member States, accusing many of, inter alia, failing to take the necessary measures to ensure that racist and xenophobic hate crimes are effectively criminalised. The article looks at the right of a Member State to limit prosecution for incitement of violence or hatred to acts that are carried out in a manner likely to disturb the public order. The authors argue that application of the ‘risk to public order’ criterion if interpreted appropriately, will in most cases reduce the threat of ‘taking it too far’. They argue also that there is a risk of confusion between ‘public order’ and ‘public nuisance’, due to the national criminal courts being more familiar with the latter. This could lead to unreasonably loose application of criminal punishments and pose a risk breaching the nullum crimen nulla poena sine lege certa principle. Perhaps because of having suffered censorship and absence of fundamental rights under the Soviet Union, Estonian society voices strong concerns about criminalisation of hate speech. In the authors’ view, these concerns may be reduced by narrow interpretation of the ‘risk to public order’ notion.
23
Moise, Andrei Emil. "The “Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege” Principle and Foreseeability of the Criminal Law in the Jurisprudence of European Court of Human Rights." Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 3, no. 7 (July 28, 2020): 240–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2020.v03i07.004.
Full text
24
Kulesza, Witold. "Sędziowie sądów specjalnych III Rzeszy i ich „zdrowe poczucie narodowe”." Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem 43, no. 4 (December 31, 2021): 253–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/2300-7249.43.4.20.
Full textAbstract:
German lawyers jointly supported the National Socialist authorities, assuming that the law was Hitler’s will, resulting from the new criminal law being introduced, which violated the principles of nullum crimen sine lege and nulla poena sine lege. Judges of special courts (Sondergerichte) in the Third Reich applied criminal law according to a “healthy national sense” (das gesunde Volksempfinden), which usually meant heavy penalties, contrary to the elementary sense of justice. It was adopted as a rule that a crime is not only what is forbidden by regulations, but also everything that the authorities have not consented to. For any behaviour, even if not prohibited by law, the judges could sentence defendants to draconian punishments, at their “national discretion.” Law professors justified the lawlessness created in the Third Reich by claiming that it was a rule of law (Rechtsstaat). The criminal law for Poles and Jews of 1941 provided for the death penalty for all manifestations of “hostile attitude” towards the German occupier. Polish forced labourers in the Reich were punished with death for violations of discipline and disobedience to the German oppressors. Poles displaced from occupied Poland were assigned to work in enterprises and farms in the Reich. The special court in Breslau sentenced to death a Pole who defended his pregnant beloved woman, forced to work beyond her strength and abused by the German housewife, as well as the unfortunate woman herself. The same court sentenced a Pole to death for trying to protect his 13-year-old son from a German farmer, who was forcing the child to perform work he was physically unable to carry out. Special-court judges continued their professional careers in West Germany after the war and did not bear any responsibility for their crimes.
25
Willems, Auke. "Book review: Legality in Europe. On the Principle Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege in EU Law and under the ECHR by Mikhel Timmerman.(Cambridge: Intersentia, 2018.)." Common Market Law Review 57, Issue 5 (October 1, 2020): 1655–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/cola2020755.
Full text
26
Kulik, Marek. "KARY DYSCYPLINARNE W USTAWIE O RADCACH PRAWNYCH. PRÓBA ANALIZY SYSTEMOWEJ." Studia Iuridica, no. 93 (January 23, 2023): 157–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-93.10.
Full textAbstract:
The study concerns the system of disciplinary penalties in the Act of 6 July 1982 on attorney-at-law (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 75, as amended). The Act provides for the penalties of admonitions, reprimands, fines, suspension or revoking of law practicing or trainee’s rights, as well as the prohibition of patronage. Apart from penalties, additional measures may be imposed which act as penal measures known to criminal law. The normative status of both is not clear in the constitutional sense. Undoubtedly, they are repressive in nature, although due to the imprecise definition of a disciplinary tort, they may raise objections from the point of view of the rules of nullum crimen and nulla poena sine lega. Both the axiological structure of the catalog of punishments and the details of their adjudication and execution raise a number of unresolved doubts in the literature. There is also no clear method of determining the amount of the fine, especially for acts that are extended in time, as well as the method of calculating the length of the prohibitions set out in the Act. The study is an attempt to assess the legal nature of penalties and measures indicated in the Act, as well as to resolve the interpretation doubts indicated above.
27
López Soria, Yudith. "Análisis de la tabla de medidas de sustancias controladas y sujetas a fiscalización, vigente en el Ecuador, en torno a la configuración legal del delito de tráfico de drogas." REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL 2, no. 3 (July 1, 2017): 103–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.29166/cap.v2i3.1946.
Full textAbstract:
En el Capítulo Tercero sobre los Delitos contra el Buen Vivir del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, Sección Segunda, encontramos regulados los Delitos por la producción o tráfico ilícito de sustancias catalogadas sujetas a fiscalización, y exactamente en el artículo 220, se regula la figura delictiva del Tráfico ilícito de sustancias catalogadas sujetas a fiscalización. El análisis de este tipo penal nos llevó a concluir que es de configuración legal insuficiente y defectuosa en el COIP, toda vez que la tabla de cantidades de sustancias catalogadas y sujetas a fiscalización, vigente en el Ecuador, para poder calificar la escala o las escalas a las que se comete el delito, no se ajusta al total contenido de la ley, exactamente al último párrafo dentro de este mismo tipo penal, dispone que: “La tenencia o posesión de sustancias estupefacientes o psicotrópicas para uso o consumo personal en las cantidades establecidas por la normativa correspondiente, no será punible”.
Vislumbramos además, que al incidir en la configuración legal, incidirá también en su integración y aplicación, y por ende, encontrará pronunciamientos judiciales, que de aplicarse tal y como prevé la ley, encontrarán conflictos importantes entre los principios constitucionales de legalidad (nullum crime, nulla poena sine lege) y ante la duda a favor del reo, (in dubio pro reo). Para demostrarlo iniciaré este análisis.
28
Klepitskiy, I. A. "Binding Nature of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation Explanations in Criminal Law." Lex Russica, no. 6 (July 5, 2021): 95–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.175.6.095-107.
Full textAbstract:
The question of the legal nature and the binding nature of explanations of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation remains debatable in the literature. When considering criminal cases, the courts do not always follow the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court. It seems that the explanations of the Supreme Court, while not being a source of criminal law, are nevertheless binding on courts and officials applying the norms of criminal law. This is a general rule, to which there are exceptions. First, there are erroneous explanations of the Supreme Court, which are not based on the established judicial practice and are not supported by it. Second, there are outdated explanations of the Supreme Court that do not meet modern legal realities. Third, there are explanations of the Supreme Court, which, in relation to a particular situation, require an expansive or restrictive interpretation. In these three situations, the Supreme Court’s explanations do not bind the law enforcement officer. The binding nature of the Supreme Court’s explanations is determined by the value of the law as such. Questions of law require a uniform resolution. An alternative to a uniform interpretation of the law is arbitrary administration. Arbitrary administration is not within the competence of the judge. There is no case law in Russia. The works of legal scholars in modern Russia also cannot satisfy the need for a uniform interpretation of the law. The significance of the explanations of the Supreme Court determines the high requirements for their quality. The Supreme Court’s explanations should not directly contradict the law. The Supreme Court’s explanations should not change unless there is an urgent need to do so. The rule nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege, being an achievement of legal culture, binds the Supreme Court. By clarifying the practice of applying the law, the Supreme Court forms and preserves judicial doctrine, thereby providing legal certainty.
29
Primetshofter, Bruno. "Eicholt, Bernd, Geltung und Durchbrechungen des Grundsatzes „nullum crimen nulla poena sine lege“ im kanonischen Recht insbesondere in c. 1399 CIC/1983, Frankfurt am Main: Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften 2006, L, 204 S. (= Adnotationes in Ius Canonicum 39)." Archiv für katholisches Kirchenrecht 175, no. 2 (June 24, 2006): 637–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/2589045x-17502028.
Full text
30
Garofalo, Luigi. "POJĘCIA I ŻYWOTNOŚĆ RZYMSKIEGO PRAWA KARNEGO." Zeszyty Prawnicze 3, no. 1 (March 29, 2017): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2003.3.1.01.
Full textAbstract:
THE NOTIONS AND VITALITY OF THE ROMAN CRIMINAL LAWSummary In the recent studies one tends to revaluate the influence of the Roman criminal law on the later penal doctrine, as well as the achievements of the Roman criminal law itself, rejecting the previous theories presenting it as significantly inferior. It is noticed in this study that the medieval jurists idolized the Roman law, adopted it to the new circumstances, and obviously made mistakes interpreting it. And thus the influence of the Roman jurisprudence on the penal doctrine of the ius commune Europe was thoroughly substantial. Notwithstanding the popular opinion also many of the Enlightenment jurists (as, for instance, Gaetano Filangieri and Francesco Mario Pagano) not only knew but also benefited from the Roman criminal law legacy. The doctrine of crime of the successive period was less inspired by the Roman criminal law, which however did not totally lose its significance. It still had some indirect influence, as the nineteenth century codifiers did not stop using the notions of criminal law shaped-up by the mediaeval jurists overwhelmingly impressed by the Roman law.The main part of the study presents a brief overview of the Roman criminal law, especially of the principal rules constituting today the general part of criminal law, principles which could be directly or indirectly found in the experience of the Roman prudentes. It is pointed out that the only Roman lawyer who tried classifying Roman criminal law was Claudius Saturninus (D. 48,19,16). His classification is later discussed in the article as well as some of the crimina (public law crimes), observing that the Romans never separated the Roman criminal law from ius. On this occasion it is underlined that one of the rules often ascribed to the Romans, nullum crimen, nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali, not only was not their own invention but it was clearly contrary to the criminal law practice in their times (the principle itself being probably formulated only by a German lawyer, Feuerbach). The Romans tried describing the subjective and objective element of the crime as well as presenting various defences available to the culprits (e.g., age, necessity, self-defence, mistake, etc).In the last part o f the paper the possible influence of the Roman criminal law constructions on the Middle Ages is pondered over. The often wrong interpretations of the ancient sources led to some embarrassment and paradoxes. This explains Baldus’ famous statement allowing the judge to construe the (Roman) statute according to the principles of the ius commune, which would in turn revive the statute and save it from an inevitable decay. The mediaeval lawyers studied and analysed the figures of deliberate misconduct and unintentional negligence (anyway without further effects in clarifying vague issue o f the subjective element of the crime). Some of the defences, like the most important figure of self-defence, known and elaborated in the Roman law came to the teachings and studies of the doctores in their original shape and significance, sometimes even stimulating further development of the penal doctrine. The mediaeval ius commune jurists adopted Roman considerations applying different responsibility regarding the doer’s age as well as Roman systématisations of the crimes subordinated to various legal principles. And therefore the doctores, following the Roman example, drew a line between public and private crimes, these which were officially prosecuted and those which were brought to court on a basis of a private motion. The jurists distinguished between lay-public and ecclesiastical crimes, between ordinary and peculiar offences, dishonourable and regular wrong-doings. Similarly the mediaeval lawyers took over the Roman considerations about attempt and iter criminis as well as concurrence of crimes and offenders.In conclusion the paper, wishing for a future development of the studies on the subject, summarises that the theoretical solutions and considerations in the Roman criminal law wrought out above by the classical jurisprudence outlived their times and became the source of the doctrinal inspirations in the coming centuries.
31
KIELSGARD, Mark D. "The Legality Principle in Sentencing at the ECCC: Making Up Law as It Goes Along?" Asian Journal of International Law 2, no. 1 (September 6, 2011): 119–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2044251311000063.
Full textAbstract:
Sui generis hybrid international criminal tribunals must conduct business without institutional memory and are only as effective or fair as their constitutive documents allow. The sparse guidance provided for the international crimes court in Cambodia creates uncertainty and arguably ambiguous standards that infringe upon the legality principle and undermine efforts for nulla poena sine lege.
32
Soegijanto, Jonathan Apriliano. "ASAS RETROAKTIF YANG BERLAKU DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERADILAN HAM." Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (July 4, 2018): 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.24269/ls.v2i1.1007.
Full textAbstract:
Asas Legalitas merupakan asas yang fundamental didalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia yang dimuat dalam Pasal 1 Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dimana dalam bahasa latin yakni Nullum delictum, nulla poena, sine praevia, legi pounali (tiada kejahatan, tiada hukuman pidana tanpa undang-undang hukum pidana terlebih dahulu). Tetapi terhadap kejahatan tertentu yang digolongkan dalam Extraordinary Crimes seperti Pelanggaran Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Berat (gross violation of human rights), keberadaan Asas Legalitas ini dapat dikecualikan sehingga dapat berlaku secara Retroaktif atau berlaku mundur. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui seberapa jauhkah Asas Retroaktif dapat berlaku dalam pelanggaran HAM yang berat. Metode yang digunakan didalam penelitian ini adalah Doctrinal Research yaitu penelitian dengan penjelasan yang sistematis tentang aturan hukum dengan kategori hukum tertentu dan menggunakan Pendekatan perundang-undangan (Statute Approach), pendekatan konseptual (Conseptual Approach), pendekatan kasus (Case Approach) dengan tujuan akhir untuk mengetahui sampai kapan batas berlakunya suatu Asas Retroaktif dalam kasus pelanggaran HAM yang berat.
33
Kim, Duol, and Wonjong Kim. "Nulla Poena Sine Lege - A Quantitative Analysis on Scope of Crimes, Level of Punishments, and Proportionality between Punishments in Korean Laws -." Justice 170, no. 3 (February 28, 2019): 58–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.29305/tj.2019.02.170.3.58.
Full text
34
Anderson, Keilin, and Adaena Sinclair-Blakemore. "Ne bis in idem, nulla poena sine lege and Domestic Prosecutions of International Crimes in the Aftermath of a Trial at the International Criminal Court." International Criminal Law Review 21, no. 1 (March 8, 2021): 35–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-21010001.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The outcome of an icc trial – be it a conviction or acquittal – receives significant attention. However, what happens to a defendant in the aftermath of the proceeding garners little discussion. This article seeks to fill this gap in the literature by analysing how the ne bis in idem and nulla poena sine lege principles, enshrined in Articles 20(2) and 23 of the Rome Statute, protect defendants from subsequent prosecutions and punishments by states and regional courts following their trials at the icc. We argue that these provisions do not provide adequate protection. Further, we argue that given the icc’s limited power to enforce compliance with these provisions as well as the primary role that states enjoy in the enforcement of international criminal law, the most appropriate way to address this issue is through the inclusion of robust protections in domestic legislation and the constituent instruments of regional courts.
35
Tigroudja, Hélène. "International Crimes and the Principle 'Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege' (Crimes de Droit International et Principe 'Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege') (French)." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1720422.
Full text
36
Yuherawan, DeniSB. "KRITIK IDEOLOGIS TERHADAP DASAR KEFILSAFATAN ASAS LEGALITAS DALAM HUKUM PIDANA." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 2 (May 15, 2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.2.32.
Full textAbstract:
The essence of legality principle is “None is punishable for doing something unless it is forbidden by law established prior to the action”. Consequently, actor of wrongdoing will not be criminally prosecuted unless penal statutes prohibit what he or she has done. The purpose of this article is to criticize the basic philosophy of legality principle. The point of departure of the critique is ontological basis of legality principle; subsequently, it goes to axiological basis of the principle. By ideological critique, it is to open up to view and at the same time criticize the basic substance and value of legality principle. In addition, this article also reexamines the legality principle. It is found that from both ontological and axiological bases, legality principle has shortcoming in that it relies upon statute rather than the substance of the conduct that may harm another. This article recommends that another more comprehensive principle be introduced, in which ‘any crime should be punished if it contradicts criminal law’ or nullum crimen (delictum) nulla poena sine prǽvia iure poenali (No offense, no punishment without criminal law previously exists). Key words: Ideological Critique, ontological and axiological bases, and sine prǽvia iure
37
Andra, Jumieko. "DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI BANGKINANG." Jurnal Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum 3, no. 2 (December 1, 2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.36085/jpk.v3i2.1198.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRAKDisparitas pidana juga sering dihubungkan dengan independensi hakim. Model pemidanaan yang diatur dalam perundang-undangan (perumusan sanksi pidana maksimal) juga ikut memberi andil. Dalam menjatuhkan putusan, hakim tidak boleh diintervensi pihak manapun. Rumusan masalah yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah pertama, bagaimanakah disparitas putusan hakim jika dihubungkan dengan asas Nulla Poena sine lege dalam memberi batasan pada hakim dihubungkan dengan Pasal 4 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Kedua, apa dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana narkotika di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Bangkinang khususnya pada Tahun 2019. Dalam melakukan penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian sebagai berikut, jenis dan sifat penelitian dari sudut metode yang di pakai dalam penelitian ini, maka penelitian ini berupa penelitian hukum normatif atau kepustakaan Dengan teknik pengumpulan data studi dokumen dan studi kepustakaan. Studi dokumen merupakan langkah awal dari setiap penelitian hukum (baik normatif maupun yang sosiologis) karena penelitian hukum selalu bertolak dari premis normatif, Sedangkan sifat penelitian ini adalah deskriptif, artinya penulis mencoba memberikan gambaran secara rinci mengenai disparitas putusan hakim pengadilan negeri bangkinang dalam perkara tindak pidana narkotika.Dilihat dari dua pokok pembahasan dan penelitian diatas maka penulis dapat menyimpulkan, pertama, disparitas putusan hakim jika dihubungkan dengan asas nulla poena sine lege dalam memberi batasan pada hakim dihubungkan dengan Pasal 4 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman: Asas nulla poena sine lege terdapat dalam pasal 1 kuhp guna memberikan batasan agar hakim tidak sewenang-wenang dalam memberikan putusan pemidanaan, akan tetapi dalam praktiknya hakim bebas memberikan putusan tanpa intervensi, Asas nulla poena sine lege warisan belanda tidak selaras dengan pasal 4 ayat 1 undang-undang republik indonesia no. 48 tahun 2009 tentang kekuasaan kehakiman. Kedua, dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana narkotika di wilayah hukum pengadilan bangkinang khususnya pada tahun 2019, hakikatnya pertimbangan hakim hendaknya juga memuat tentang hal-hal sebagai berikut: Pokok persoalan dan hal-hal yang diakui atau dalil-dalil yang tidak disangkal. Adanya analisis secara yuridis terhadap putusan segala aspek menyangkut semua fakta / hal-hal yang terbukti dalam persidangan. Kata kunci: disparitas; putusan hakim; tindak pidana narkotikaABSTRACTCriminal disparity is also often associated with the independence of judges. The criminal punishment model regulated in legislation (the formulation of maximum criminal sanctions) also contributes. In passing a decision, a judge may not be intervened by any party. The formulation of the problem examined in this study is firstly, how is the disparity in the decision of the judge if it is related to the principle of Nulla Poena sine lege in giving limitations to the judge related to Article 4 Paragraph (1) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Second, what is the basis of the judge's judgment in imposing a criminal decision on narcotics offenders in the Legal Area of the Bangkinang Court, especially in 2019.In conducting this research, the author uses the following research methods, types and nature of research from the point of view of the method used in this study, then this research is in the form of normative legal research or literature. Document study is the first step of any legal research (both normative and sociological) because legal research always departs from the normative premise, while the nature of this research is descriptive, meaning that the writer tries to give a detailed description of the disparity in decisions of the district court judges in criminal cases narcotics.Judging from the two points of discussion and research above, the writer can conclude, first, the disparity in the decision of the judge if it is related to the principle of nulla poena sine lege in giving limits to the judge connected with Article 4 Paragraph (1) of the Republic of Indonesia Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power: The principle of nulla poena sine lege is contained in article 1 of the Kuhp in order to provide a limitation so that judges are not arbitrary in giving criminal decisions, but in practice judges are free to give decisions without intervention, the nulla poena sine lege principle is not inherited from the Dutch legacy. in line with article 4 paragraph 1 of the law of the Republic of Indonesia no. 48 of 2009 concerning judicial authority. Second, the basic consideration of judges in issuing criminal decisions against narcotics offenders in the jurisdiction of the Bangkinang court, especially in 2019, in essence the judges' considerations should also contain the following matters: Principal issues and matters that are recognized or arguments that are recognized not denied. There is a juridical analysis of the verdict on all aspects concerning all facts / proven matters in the trial.Keywords: disparity; judge decision; narcotics crime
38
De Carli, Carla Veríssimo. "Gramática do Direito Internacional Penal: as Linguagens do Crime e da Punição." Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS 9, no. 1 (August 30, 2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.22456/2317-8558.42767.
Full textAbstract:
GRAMÁTICA DO DIREITO INTERNACIONAL PENAL: AS LINGUAGENS DO CRIME E DA PUNIÇÃO THE GRAMMAR OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW: THE LANGUAGES OF CRIME AND PUNISHMENT Carla Veríssimo de Carli RESUMO: O trabalho examina a influência dos diferentes sistemas de justiça criminal na construção de uma dogmática internacional penal. Primeiro, discutem-se as diferentes formas de pensar sobre o crime, bem como as principais características e diferenças, externas e internas, entre a Strafrechtswissenschaft e a Common Law. Examina-se a teoria do delito de cada um desses sistemas. Segundo, é dada atenção à evolução do direito internacional penal, focando na progressiva adoção do princípio da legalidade e seu consectário, a proibição da retroatividade em matéria internacional penal. Finalmente, examina-se o Estatuto de Roma e a estrutura do delito nos crimes internacionais, para concluir que a opção feita foi pelo sistema da Common Law no âmbito internacional. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Direito internacional penal; Strafrechtswissenshchaft; Common Law. ABSTRACT: This paper examines the influence of different criminal justice systems in the building of an international criminal doctrine. First, the different ways of thinking about crime are discussed, as well as the main characteristics and differences, external and internal, between Strafrechtswissenchaft and Common Law. The theory of the offense of each of these systems is examined. Second, attention is given to the evolution of International Criminal Law, focusing on the progressive adoption of the principle of nulla poena sine lege and its consequence, the prohibiton of ex post facto laws in international criminal matters. Finally, the analysis of the Rome Statute and the structure of the offence in international crimes is made, in order to reach the conclusion that the option was made for the Common Law system in the international arena. KEYWORDS: International criminal law; Strafrechtswissenschaft; Common Law.SUMÁRIO: Introdução. 1. Sintaxe: as formas de pensar o crime. 1.1 Sistemas de justiça criminal. 1.2 Strafrechtswissenschaft e Common Law: características e diferenças. 1.3 Teorias do delito. 2. Semântica: os desafios para a dogmática internacional penal. 2.1 O princípio da legalidade em direito internacional penal. 2.2 Crimes internacionais: estrutura bipartida ou tripartida? Considerações finais. Referências.