Relevant bibliographies by topics / Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 5 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr"

1

Feffer, Andrew, and Robert W. Gordon. "The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr." Journal of American History 80, no. 4 (March 1994): 1485. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2080678.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Urofsky, Melvin I., and Gary J. Aichele. "Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.: Soldier, Scholar, Judge." American Journal of Legal History 34, no. 1 (January 1990): 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/845353.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Burton, David H., and Gary J. Aichele. "Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.: Soldier, Scholar, Judge." Journal of American History 77, no. 1 (June 1990): 302. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2078699.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Pohlman, H. L., and Gary J. Aichele. "Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.: Soldier, Scholar, Judge." American Historical Review 95, no. 4 (October 1990): 1305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2163706.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Levy, David W. "The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr." History: Reviews of New Books 22, no. 2 (January 1994): 91–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03612759.1994.9948926.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hoffheimer, Michael H., and Robert W. Gordon. "The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr." American Journal of Legal History 37, no. 4 (October 1993): 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/845817.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wells, Catharine Pierce. "Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and the American Civil War." Journal of Supreme Court History 40, no. 3 (October 18, 2015): 282–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsch.12083.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Snyder, Brad. "The House that Built Holmes." Law and History Review 30, no. 3 (August 2012): 661–721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0738248012000235.

Full text
Abstract:
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. is one of the few modern judges whose reputations have survived the twentieth century's culture wars relatively intact. Among his contemporaries Louis Brandeis, Benjamin Cardozo, and Learned Hand, Holmes was the first to become a judicial and cultural icon. Although Holmes's judicial reputation has fluctuated wildly since his death, his canonical status is unquestioned. His opinions, like those of Brandeis, are often quoted in high-profile Supreme Court decisions. Popular historians continue to be fascinated with his life story.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Fleischer, Lawrence M., David H. Burton, Oliver Wendell Holmes, and Franklin Ford. "Progressive Masks: Letters of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and Franklin Ford." American Journal of Legal History 29, no. 1 (January 1985): 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/844991.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Danisch, Robert. "Aphorisms, Enthymemes, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. on the First Amendment." Rhetoric Review 27, no. 3 (June 16, 2008): 219–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07350190802126128.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr"

1

Swisher, Andrew Ryan. ""WAR IS THE ULTIMATE RATIONALITY": The Place of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in the American Founding Tradition." Ohio Dominican University / OhioLINK, 2015. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=odu1449232593.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bisbal, Torres Marta. "La Libertad de expresión en el pensamiento liberal: John Stuart Mill y Oliver Wendell Holmes." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Lleida, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/8138.

Full text
Abstract:
La llibertat d'expressió té els seus origens en el liberalisme de Gran Bretanya i
els Estats Units. Les primeres reivindicacions a favor d'un intercanvi lliure d'idees
van començar al segle XVII, amb el discurs Areopagitica de John Milton, que
demanava al Parlament anglès l'abolició de la censura a la imprempta. El 1971
la llibertat d'expressió es va incorporar a la Constitució dels Estats Units; la seva
Primera Esmena declarava: "el Congrés no farà cap llei... per la que es limiti la
llibertat de paraula, o la de premsa". Aquest treball es centra en les aportacions a
la llibertat d'expressió realitzades per John Stuart Mill, utilitarista anglès, i Oliver
Wendell Holmes, realista americà, les quals es van introduir entre la segona
meitat del segle XIX i la primera meitat del segle XX. Les obres d'ambdós autors
s'estudien tenint en compte el moviment filosòfic al qual pertanyen. En primer
lloc, la teoria sobre llibertat de pensament i discussió de John Stuart Mill es
relaciona amb la seva filosofia moral i política. En segon lloc, s'analitzen les
opinions judicials d'Oliver Wendell Holmes en les que formula el test del "perill
clar i actual" i la teoria del "mercat obert de les idees". Aquesta aproximació
permet mostrar que ambdós autors van liberalitzar el concepte de llibertat
d'expressió imperant a la seva època, i van considerar que els seus fonaments
principals eren la recerca de la veritat i l'autorrealització individual.
La libertad de expresión tiene sus orígenes en el liberalismo de Gran Bretaña y
los Estados Unidos. Las primeras reivindicaciones a favor de un intercambio libre
de ideas empezaron en el siglo XVII, con el discurso Areopagitica de John
Milton, que pedía al Parlamento inglés la abolición de la censura en la imprenta.
En 1791 la libertad de expresión se incorporó a la Constitución de los Estados
Unidos, cuya Primera Enmienda declaraba: "el Congreso no hará ley alguna...
por la que se limite la libertad de palabra, o la de prensa". Este trabajo se centra
en las aportaciones a la libertad de expresión realizadas por John Stuart Mill,
utilitarista inglés, y Oliver Wendell Holmes, realista americano, las cuales se
introdujeron entre la segunda mitad del siglo XIX y la primera mitad del siglo XX.
Las obras de ambos autores se estudian teniendo en cuenta el movimiento
filosófico al cual pertenecen. En primer lugar, la teoría sobre libertad de
pensamiento y discusión de John Stuart Mill se relaciona con su filosofía moral y
política. En segundo lugar, se analizan las opiniones judiciales de Oliver Wendell
Holmes en las que se formula el test del "peligro claro y actual" y la teoría del
"mercado abierto de las ideas". Esta aproximación permite mostrar que ambos
autores liberalizaron el concepto de libertad de expresión imperante en su
época, y consideraron que sus fundamentos principales eran la búsqueda de la
verdad y la autorrealización individual.
Freedom of speech has its origins in liberalism from Great Britain and the United
States. The first claims for a free exchange of ideas started in the 17th century,
with John Milton's Areopagitica, in which the abolishing of printing censorship by
the English Parliament was demanded. In 1791, freedom of speech was included
in the Constitution of the United States, whose First Amendment declared:
"Congress shall make no law. abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press".
This study focuses on the specific contributions to freedom of speech made by
the English utilitarian John Stuart Mill and the American realist Oliver Wendell
Holmes, which were introduced throughout the second half of 19th century and
the first half of 20th century. The works of both authors are discussed bearing in
mind the philosophical movement to which they belong. Firstly, John Stuart Mill's
theory of thought and speech is related to his moral and political philosophy.
Secondly, Oliver Wendell Holmes' judicial opinions on both "clear and present
danger" test and the "free marketplace of ideas" are analysed. This approach
makes it possible to show both authors liberalize the concept of freedom of
speech and consider that its foundations are, basically, the discovery of truth
along with individual self-development.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Braithwaite, Murray James. "A dynamics theory of justice : Nietzsche, Holmes, and self-organizing criticality." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2000. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ48609.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

BORBA, Luiz Edmundo Celso. "As raízes do experimentalismo no pensamento de Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior e o surgimento da tese de junção do direito com a economia na obra de Richard Posner." Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2013. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/11067.

Full text
Abstract:
Submitted by Luiz Felipe Barbosa (luiz.fbabreu2@ufpe.br) on 2015-03-06T13:16:01Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese Luiz Edmundo Borba.pdf: 2126844 bytes, checksum: d27b45ab850cfe6a506c6fb817a2431a (MD5) license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-06T13:16:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese Luiz Edmundo Borba.pdf: 2126844 bytes, checksum: d27b45ab850cfe6a506c6fb817a2431a (MD5) license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-02-28
A presente pesquisa versa sobre as principais raízes do experimentalismo a influenciar Oliver Wendel Holmes Junior, a exemplo de: Aristóteles, Smith e Peirce, culminando no Pragmatismo Jurídico, consubstanciado em um modelo de Estado a dotar uma política econômica liberal, terminando por separar a utilização das normas morais, das normas jurídicas. Holmes apenas almeja separar a moral da aplicação do Direito, como faz em “The Path of The Law”. Posner, um dos seus mais fervorosos admiradores, termina por criar um modelo teórico inovador, afastando por completo a norma moral da prática jurígena e inaugura a análise econômica do direito, como defendido pela maioria da doutrina. As críticas ao seu trabalho surgiram como uma decorrência lógica, trazendo modificações às suas teorias de escolha da maximização de riquezas como elemento ético primordial a nortear o Direito. As teses, aqui, levantadas versam sobre quatro pontos específicos: Há similaridades entre retórica e pragmatismo? Adam Smith ou Posner: quem seria o verdadeiro artífice da análise econômica do direito? Quais o motivo principal de sua prosperidade em Estados liberais? Por fim, como aproveitar a vasta e rica teoria criada por Posner, a mais inovadora do século passado e em crescente expansão no Brasil?
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Santos, Jaqueline Lucca. "A função primordial da regra jurídica : a construção do ponto de vista interno a partir das críticas às teorias de Holmes e Kelsen." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/147075.

Full text
Abstract:
A pretensão do positivismo jurídico é o esclarecimento teórico para se realizar uma descrição correta do direito. A presente dissertação busca verificar qual a abordagem mais adequada para se alcançar a concretização da separação do direito da moral, sendo que o fio condutor é a obra de H.L.A. Hart, na qual se destaca o livro The Concept of Law. Dessa maneira, o problema a que se propõe o trabalho é evidenciar a complexidade da separação do direito da moral. Pretende-se demonstrar, principalmente através da teoria e obra de Herbert Hart, que Oliver Holmes e Hans Kelsen ao apresentarem seus projetos para separação do direito da moralidade, trataram o direito do ponto de vista descritivo, perdendo a caracterização do próprio direito. O primeiro capítulo é dedicado a apresentar e explicar o projeto positivista, já que condutas exigíveis por regras jurídicas não se confundem com as condutas exigidas por regras morais, ainda que conjuntamente possam existir. Ainda nesse capítulo apresentam-se algumas noções importantes para a compreensão e desenvolvimento do trabalho em relação à teoria de Hart, em especial no que tange ao ponto de vista interno e externo. No segundo capítulo é abordada a obra de Holmes, The Path of the Law, e as principais críticas construídas por Hart e discutidas por Stephen Perry e Scott Shapiro. Partindo-se da perspectiva do homem mau presente na teoria, pretende-se demonstrar que esta é insuficiente para compreender a teoria do direito, em especial nas razões pelas quais um cidadão segue o direito, já que nem todos estariam preocupados em qual é a sanção que receberão do Estado caso desobedeçam à regra. No terceiro e último capítulo demonstra-se quais os problemas da teoria de Kelsen apontadas por Hart. Especialmente no que se refere à ideia de Kelsen de que o direito é só forma, podendo ter qualquer conteúdo, enquanto que Hart acredita que o direito deve possuir conteúdo mínimo. Segundo Kelsen, a estrutura normativa é pressuposta, sendo que a regra funciona como esquema de interpretação e a principal função desta é a sanção. O objetivo final do trabalho é demonstrar que neste projeto de tentar salvar a autonomia do direito, Holmes e Kelsen descaracterizaram o fenômeno jurídico como uma prática social.
The claim of legal positivism is the theoretical clarification to perform a correct description of the law. This work aims to verify the most appropriate approach to achieving the implementation of the separation of law from morality, and the common thread is the work of H.L.A. Hart, which stresses the book The Concept of Law. Thus, the problem that is proposed work is to show the complexity of separating law from morals. We intend to show, especially through the theory and work of Herbert Hart, that Oliver Holmes and Hans Kelsen when presented their projects for separating the right of morality, they treated law of the descriptive point of view, losing the characterization of the law itself. The first chapter is dedicated to present and explain the positivist project, as required by legal conduct rules are not confused with the conduct required by moral rules, albeit jointly may exist. Although this chapter presents some important concepts for understanding and development work in relation to Hart's theory, especially with regard to internal and external point of view. The second chapter discussed the work of Holmes, The Path of the Law, and the main criticisms built by Hart and discussed by Stephen Perry and Scott Shapiro. Starting from the bad man present perspective in theory, intended to demonstrate that this is insufficient to understand the theory of law, in particular the reasons why a citizen follows the law, since not everyone would be worried about what is the sanction which receive if they disobey the rule. In the third and last chapter shows is that the problems of Kelsen's theory pointed out by Hart. Especially with regard to the idea of Kelsen that law is shaped and can have any content, while Hart believes that law should have a minimum content. According to Kelsen, the regulatory framework is presupposed, and the rule works as interpretation scheme and the main function of this is the sanction. The ultimate goal of the work is to demonstrate that this project of trying to save the autonomy of law, Holmes and Kelsen misrepresent the legal phenomenon as a social practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Tyler, John. "A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity." Thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-05-10885.

Full text
Abstract:
American jurisprudence currently applies two incompatible validity standards to determine which laws are enforceable. The natural law tradition evaluates validity by an uncertain standard of divine law, and its methodology relies on contradictory views of human reason. Legal positivism, on the other hand, relies on a methodology that commits the analytic fallacy, separates law from its application, and produces an incomplete model of law. These incompatible standards have created a schism in American jurisprudence that impairs the delivery of justice. This dissertation therefore formulates a new standard for legal validity. This new standard rejects the uncertainties and inconsistencies inherent in natural law theory. It also rejects the narrow linguistic methodology of legal positivism. In their stead, this dissertation adopts a pragmatic methodology that develops a standard for legal validity based on actual legal experience. This approach focuses on the operations of law and its effects upon ongoing human activities, and it evaluates legal principles by applying the experimental method to the social consequences they produce. Because legal history provides a long record of past experimentation with legal principles, legal history is an essential feature of this method. This new validity standard contains three principles. The principle of reason requires legal systems to respect every subject as a rational creature with a free will. The principle of reason also requires procedural due process to protect against the punishment of the innocent and the tyranny of the majority. Legal systems that respect their subjects' status as rational creatures with free wills permit their subjects to orient their own behavior. The principle of reason therefore requires substantive due process to ensure that laws provide dependable guideposts to individuals in orienting their behavior. The principle of consent recognizes that the legitimacy of law derives from the consent of those subject to its power. Common law custom, the doctrine of stare decisis, and legislation sanctioned by the subjects' legitimate representatives all evidence consent. The principle of autonomy establishes the authority of law. Laws must wield supremacy over political rulers, and political rulers must be subject to the same laws as other citizens. Political rulers may not arbitrarily alter the law to accord to their will. Legal history demonstrates that, in the absence of a validity standard based on these principles, legal systems will not treat their subjects as ends in themselves. They will inevitably treat their subjects as mere means to other ends. Once laws do this, men have no rest from evil.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr"

1

Edward, White G., ed. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. 2nd ed. Oxford [England]: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

White, G. Edward. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Holmes, Oliver Wendell. The Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., papers. Frederick, Md: University Publications of America, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Aichele, Gary Jan. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.--soldier, scholar, judge. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Schulkin, Jay. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Aichele, Gary Jan. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.--soldier, scholar, judge. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., legal theory, and judicial restraint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

1938-, Wiecek William M., ed. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.: The Supreme Court and American legal thought. New York: PowerPlus Books, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Wendell, Holmes Oliver. Holmes-Sheehan correspondence: Letters of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. and Canon Patrick Augustine Sheehan. [Bronx, N.Y.]: Fordham University Press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

A, Posner Richard, ed. The essential Holmes: Selections from the letters, speeches, judicial opinions, and other writings of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr"

1

Posner, Richard A. "Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. (1841–1935)." In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 902–4. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_171.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Schulkin, Jay. "Holmes, Pragmatism and Nature." In Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience, 69–96. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Schulkin, Jay. "Neuroscientific Considerations and the Law." In Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience, 239–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Schulkin, Jay. "Introduction." In Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience, 1–13. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Schulkin, Jay. "Conclusion: Pragmatism and the Law in the Age of Neuroscience." In Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience, 275–302. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Schulkin, Jay. "Holmes’s Critical Experience in War: Trauma and the Brain." In Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience, 15–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Schulkin, Jay. "Experience, Prediction, Surviving." In Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience, 39–67. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Schulkin, Jay. "Duty, Surviving, Social Contact." In Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience, 97–118. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Schulkin, Jay. "Emersonian Sensibilities." In Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience, 119–50. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Schulkin, Jay. "Bounded Choice, Human Freedom and Problem-Solving." In Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience, 151–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography