Academic literature on the topic 'Open-source software – Law and legislation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Open-source software – Law and legislation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Open-source software – Law and legislation"
Khan, T. U. R., P. Davis, and F. J. Behr. "A FRAMEWORK FOR AN OPEN SOURCE GEOSPATIAL CERTIFICATION MODEL." ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLI-B6 (June 17, 2016): 57–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b6-57-2016.
Full textZarubin, Mikhail, Larissa Statsenko, Pavel Spiridonov, Venera Zarubina, Noune Melkoumian, and Olga Salykova. "A GIS Software Module for Environmental Impact Assessment of the Open Pit Mining Projects for Small Mining Operators in Kazakhstan." Sustainability 13, no. 12 (June 21, 2021): 6971. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13126971.
Full textAlamsyah, Alamsyah, Sri Suwitri, Kismartini Kismartini, and Yuwanto Yuwanto. "Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Understand the Process of Local Legislation in Indonesia." Sriwijaya Law Review 3, no. 1 (January 31, 2019): 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol3.iss1.136.pp34-47.
Full textPissarra, Teresa C. T., Aline B. Marcussi, Gilberto da R. Leão, João A. Galbiatti, Mauricio J. Borges, and Sergio Campos. "Environmental adaptation of the source of the subbasin of Rico Stream, Monte Alto - SP, Brazil." Engenharia Agrícola 33, no. 2 (April 2013): 303–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69162013000200009.
Full textCron, Alan H. "From legislation to implementation." Journal of Educational Administration 54, no. 1 (February 1, 2016): 75–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jea-06-2014-0065.
Full textMudda, Dr Mallikarjun. "Iot Based System to Avoid Open Spitting and Defeacation." International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 9, no. VI (June 30, 2021): 4537–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.36004.
Full textHon, Mun-Wai, Greg Russell, and Michael Welch. "Open Source Software Considerations for Law Enforcement." IT Professional 12, no. 6 (November 2010): 18–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2010.121.
Full textSavelyev, Alexander. "Open source: the Russian experience (legislation and practice)." Information & Communications Technology Law 22, no. 1 (March 2013): 27–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2013.778520.
Full textHenley, Mark, and Richard Kemp. "Open Source Software: An introduction." Computer Law & Security Review 24, no. 1 (January 2008): 77–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2007.11.003.
Full textDalle, Jean Michel, Paul A. David, Matthijs den Besten, and W. Edward Steinmueller. "Empirical issues in open source software." Information Economics and Policy 20, no. 4 (December 2008): 301–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.09.001.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Open-source software – Law and legislation"
Karjiker, Sadulla. "Open-source software and the rationale for copyright protection of computer programs." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/80044.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The rationale for the legal protection of copyright works is based on the perceived need to encourage the creation of works which are considered to be socially beneficial. By awarding authors proprietary rights in their creations, copyright law allows authors the ability to earn direct financial returns from their efforts, and, thus, copyright law provides the required incentives for authors to create copyright works. Since the early days of commercial software development, copyright protection has been extended to computer programs; thus, by providing such protection it was assumed that their production should be encouraged, and that without such protection they will not be produced to the extent required by society. Comparatively recently, we have witnessed large-scale production of open-source software, which is licensed on generous terms, giving users the right to freely use, modify and redistribute such software. By adopting such licensing terms, the authors of open-source software are unable to charge licensees a fee for permission to use their software, which is the reward which copyright assumes authors seek to create such software. This development has made it necessary to re-evaluate the rationale for copyright protection of computer programs, and determine whether the continued protection of computer programs is justifiable. This study seeks to first establish a coherent theoretical justification for copyright protection, which it is submitted should be an economic justification, rather than a moral justification. The legal analysis in this work seeks to establish whether the copyright protection of computer programs is consistent with the economic justification for copyright protection. In particular, the analysis focuses on the current scope of copyright protection, and seeks to establish whether such protection is excessive, stifling creativity and innovation, and, thus, imposing too high a social cost. It is contended that copyright doctrine has generally sought to minimise these costs, and that current scope of copyright protection of computer programs leaves enough creative room for the production of new software. Despite the fact that the effect of open-source software licences is that authors are unable to earn the direct financial rewards which copyright enables authors to earn as an incentive to create such software, their authors continue to have financial incentives to create such software. Commercial firms who invest in open-source software do so because they seek to provide financially-rewarding related services in respect of software, or because it serves to promote sales in their complementary products. Similarly, the participation of individual computer programmers is largely consistent with the standard economic theories relating to labour markets and the private provision of public goods. Individuals are principally motivated by economic motives, such as career concerns. Copyright protection gives participants the choice to opt for the direct financial rewards which its proprietary protection enables, or the more indirect financial rewards of open-source software development. It is submitted within this research that rather than undermining the rationale for copyright protection of computer programs, the development of open-source software has illustrated that copyright protection allows for the emergence of alternative business models, which may be more economically advantageous to authors.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die rasionaal agter outeursregbeskerming wat deur die reg verleen word is gebasseer op 'n behoefte om die skepping van werke wat sosiaal voordelig geag word te bevorder. Outeursreg verleen aan outeurs direkte finansiële vergoeding vir hul inspanning deur die vestiging van eiendomsreg oor hul werke. Dus, outeursreg voorsien outeurs van die nodige insentiewe om sulke werke te skep. Sedert die begindae van kommersiële sagteware ontwikkeling, is outeursregbeskerming uitgebrei om aan rekenaarprogramme sulke beskerming te bied. Deur die bied van outeursregbeskerming word daar aangeneem dat die ontwikkeling van rekenaarprogramme aangemoedig word en dat sonder die genoemde beskerming programme nie geproduseer sal word tot in 'n mate benodig deur die samelewing nie. Onlangs egter, is daar 'n grootskaalse ontwikkeling van oopbronsagteware opgemerk. Hierdie sagteware word onder ruime terme gelisensieer en gee aan gebruikers die reg om die genoemde sagteware te gebruik, te wysig en vrylik te versprei. Deur sulke terme van lisensiëring aan te neem word outeurs verhoed om vanaf lisensiehouers 'n fooi te vorder vir die toestemming om die sagteware te gebruik. Outeursreg neem aan dat hierdie vergoeding die basis vorm waarom outeurs sulke sagteware ontwikkel. Hierdie ontwikkeling maak dit nodig om die rasionaal agter outeursregbeskerming van rekenaarprogramme te her-evalueer en ook om vas te stel of die volgehoue beskerming van rekenaarprogramme regverdigbaar is. Hierdie studie poog om, eerstens, 'n samehangende teoretiese regverdiging vir outeursreg te vestig. Daar word aan die hand gedoen dat hierdie beskerming 'n ekonomiese, eerder as 'n morele regverdiging as grondslag moet hê. Die regsontleding vervat in hierdie werk poog om vas te stel of die outeursregbeskerming wat aan rekenaarprogramme verleen word in lyn is met die ekonomiese regverdiging van outeursregbeskerming. Die analise fokus in besonder op die huidige bestek van outeursregbeskerming en poog om vas te stel of sodanige beskerming oormatig is, of dit kreatiwiteit en innovasie onderdruk en derhalwe te hoë sosiale koste tot gevolg het. Daar word geargumenteer dat outeursreg in die algemeen poog om sosiale koste te verlaag en dat die huidige omvang van outeursregbeskerming van rekenaarprogramme voldoende kreatiewe ruimte vir die ontwikkeling van nuwe sagteware laat. Die effek van oopbronsagteware is dat outeurs nie in staat is om direkte finansiële vergoeding te verdien, wat as insentief gesien word vir die ontwikkeling van sagteware, nie. Ten spyte hiervan is daar steeds voldoende finansiële insentiewe om sodanige sagteware te ontwikkel. Kommersiële firmas belê in oopbronsagteware om finansiëel lonende verwante dienste ten opsigte van sagteware te voorsien. Dit kan ook dien om verkope in hul onderskeie aanvullende produkte te bevorder. Eweweens is die deelname van individuele rekenaarprogrameerders oorwegend in lyn met die standaard ekonomiese teoriëe ten opsigte van die arbeidsmark en die privaat voorsiening van openbare goedere. Individue word gemotiveer deur ekonomiese motiewe, soos byvoorbeeld oorwegings wat verband hou met hul loopbane. Outeursregbeskerming bied aan deelnemers die keuse om voordeel te trek uit die direkte finansiële vergoeding wat moontlik gemaak word deur outeursregbeskerming of uit die meer indirekte finansiële vergoeding gebied deur die ontwikkeling van oopbronsagteware. In hierdie navorsing word daar geargumenteer dat die ontwikkeling van oopbronsagteware geillustreer het dat outeursregbeskerming die onstaan van alternatiewe besigheidsmodelle toelaat wat ekonomies meer voordelig is vir outeurs in plaas daarvan dat dit die rasionaal vir die outeursregbeskerming van rekenaarprogramme ondermyn.
Mubarak, Asma. "An empirical study of package coupling in Java open-source." Thesis, Brunel University, 2010. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/4527.
Full textDysart, Thomas. "Systems within systems : free and open source software licences under German and United States law." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2017. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:4632118c-1ef6-47b9-ac89-2b3c7889f881.
Full textGlemža, Gunaras. "Atviri standartai ir atviro kodo programinė įranga elaktroninės valdžios plėtroje." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2005. http://vddb.library.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2005~D_20050518_102034-12308.
Full textZhu, Chenwei. "Authoring collaborative projects : a study of intellectual property and free and open source software (FOSS) licensing schemes from a relational contract perspective." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2011. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/294/.
Full textKučera, František. "Možnosti využití svobodného a otevřeného softwaru pro podnikání." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2009. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-19060.
Full textLu, Shaw-Chun, and 呂紹君. "A Study on Competition Law Issues of Open Source Software." Thesis, 2014. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/52833691222870315025.
Full text國立臺灣科技大學
專利研究所
102
The purpose of the study was to discuss existing and fore coming competition law issues of open source software. Since the high liquidity and fast-developing environment of open source software, the powerful market scale has been far more prospective than people thought. Chapter 2 of the study describes the definition of open source software, and presents the difference between “open source software” and “free software”. Since the term “open source software” was adopted by the study, the key elements of open source software were introduced. Then the technology and the business models of open source, and the difference between the business models were introduced. Chapter 3 provides the interaction between open source and the market, also the categories and the contents of several common open source licenses. Then the relationship between open source and intellectual property rights was introduced, especially the issue of copyright misuse. The issues of software patents and patent infringements were also provided. Chapter 4 introduced the competition laws of United States and European Union, and analyzed the background and meanings of Sherman Act, Clayton Act and Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Then the facts, issue, conclusions of competition law cases of open source software were introduced, ends up with core issue of competition law of open source software. Since there are limited references of competition law issues of open source software, Chapter 5 analyzes issues of foretasted cases. And defining the market position of open source software is needed, and then the German competition law theories, such as “Unternehmen mit relativer oder uberlegener Marktmacht” and “Abhangig” are used. Probable solutions and strategies for government and businesses are also provided, and this study ends with conclusions and comments in Chapter 6.
Tran, Du Vinh. "Three essays on industrial organization." Thesis, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/3055.
Full textTran, Du Vinh 1977. "Three essays on industrial organization." 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/13235.
Full textBorges, Bruno de Moura. "Technology and Development: The Political Economy of Open Source Software." Diss., 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/2290.
Full textThis dissertation examines the role of governments in adopting Open Source Software (OSS) for their needs and tries to explain the variation in adoption and implmentation, among both developing and developed countries. The work argues that there are different logics guiding developing and developed countries OSS adoption. As developed countries follow a pattern based on the Varieties of Capitalism model, the difference in OSS adoption in developing countries is a combination of the relation between the state and market forces (especially how business and firms are organized) and state capacity to overcome collective action problems and to reap the benefits of technological upgrade. This dissertation also presents a structured and focused comparison of two cases (Brazil and Mexico) and define which are the factors that matter for the outcomes.
Dissertation
Books on the topic "Open-source software – Law and legislation"
Institute, Pennsylvania Bar. Open source software licensing. Mechanicsburg, Pa: Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2007.
Find full textRosen, Lawrence E. Open source licensing: Software freedom and intellectual property law. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR, 2005.
Find full textOpen source software and intellectual property rights. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2014.
Find full textMeeker, Heather J. The Open Source Alternative. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2008.
Find full textBrande, Ywein van den, Shane Coughlan, and Till Jaeger. The international free and open source software law book. Munich/Germany: Open Source Press, 2011.
Find full textPutranti, Ika Riswanti. Lisensi copyleft dan perlindungan open source software di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gallery Ilmu, 2010.
Find full textPutranti, Ika Riswanti. Lisensi copyleft dan perlindungan open source software di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gallery Ilmu, 2010.
Find full textThe software license unveiled: How legislation by license controls software access. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Open-source software – Law and legislation"
Haff, Gordon. "What’s the Law?" In How Open Source Ate Software, 47–73. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-6800-1_3.
Full textSyeed, M. M. Mahbubul, and Imed Hammouda. "Socio-technical Congruence in OSS Projects: Exploring Conway’s Law in FreeBSD." In Open Source Software: Quality Verification, 109–26. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38928-3_8.
Full textvan Wendel de Joode, R., J. A. de Bruijn, and M. J. G. van Eeten. "Describing Open Source and Free Software Communities." In Information Technology and Law Series, 5–31. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-657-2_2.
Full textvan Wendel de Joode, R., J. A. de Bruijn, and M. J. G. van Eeten. "Interpreting Open Source and Free Software Communities." In Information Technology and Law Series, 33–50. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-657-2_3.
Full textBain, Malcolm. "Google Chrome and Android: Legal Aspects of Open Source Software." In Information Technology and Law Series, 259–86. The Hague, The Netherlands: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-846-0_9.
Full textBayamlıoğlu, Emre. "Turkish Copyright Law on Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Licenses." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 445–60. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21560-0_23.
Full textKojima, Ryu. "Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) and Other Alternative License Models in Japan." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 271–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21560-0_14.
Full textMaggs, Peter B. "The Uncertain Legal Status of Free and Open Source Software in the United States." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 477–93. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21560-0_25.
Full textPolido, Fabrício Bertini Pasquot, and Mônica Steffen Guise Rosina. "Free Open Source Software and Creative Commons in Brazil: Mapping the Legal Framework of Alternative Intellectual Property Licenses." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 77–104. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21560-0_3.
Full textHuttunen, Anniina, Henri Tanskanen, and Martin von Willebrand. "Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Licenses and Other Alterative Licenses Under Finnish Law – Hybrid Contracts Including Both Copyright and Contract-Related Elements." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 171–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21560-0_8.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Open-source software – Law and legislation"
Furtado de Magalhães Gomes, Marcella, Roberto Vasconcelos Novaes, and Mariana Guimarães Becker. "Open source software, access to knowledge and software licensing." In XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Initia Via, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17931/ivr2013_sws24_02.
Full textCazanescu, Severin. "FLOODPLAIN MAPS PREPARATION WITH AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D AND OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE." In 13th SGEM GeoConference on ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION. Stef92 Technology, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2013/be5.v1/s20.064.
Full textWang, Jing, and John M. Carroll. "Behind Linus's law: A preliminary analysis of open source software peer review practices in Mozilla and Python." In 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cts.2011.5928673.
Full textBonolo de Campos, Gustavo, Cleverson Bringhenti, Diogo F. Cavalca, Jesuíno T. Tomita, Werner Riederer, and Raphael L. Pinto. "Parallel Between Rankine and Combined-Cycle Power Plants Configurations Burning Blast Furnace Gas." In ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/gt2017-64341.
Full textWang, Yuyu, Rui Yang, Zhenxiang Tao, and Cong Li. "Numerical Simulation of Radioactive Material Around Opening-Windows Construction." In ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2017-71185.
Full text