Books on the topic 'Operational capabilities'

Kent, Glenn A. A framework for enhancing operational capabilities. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1991.

Ryter, Marc-André. EU capabilities for autonomous military crisis management: Possibilities and limits. Helsinki: National Defence College, 2001.

National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Network-Centric Naval Forces. Network-centric naval forces: A transition strategy for enhancing operational capabilities. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 2000.

1943-, Hura Myron, Young Thomas-Durell, and Arroyo Center. Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program, eds. Enhancing Army Joint Force headquarters capabilities. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Arroyo Center, 2010.

Kamphausen, Roy. The PLA at home and abroad: Assessing the operational capabilities of China's military. Edited by Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute, Texas A & M University. George Bush School of Government and Public Service, National Bureau of Asian Research (U.S.), and Army War College (U.S.). Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 2010.

Scobell, Andrew, Roy Kamphausen, and David Lai. The PLA at home and abroad: Assessing the operational capabilities of China's military. United States: [publisher not identified], 2009.

Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute, Texas A & M University. George Bush School of Government and Public Service, National Bureau of Asian Research (U.S.), and Army War College (U.S.), eds. The PLA at home and abroad: Assessing the operational capabilities of China's military. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 2010.

Rabkin, Norman. Strategic mobility: Serious problems remain in U.S. deployment capabilities : statement of Norman Rabkin, Associate Director, Military Operations and Capabilities Issues, National Security and International Affairs Division, before the Subcommittee on Readiness, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. [Washington, D.C.]: The Office, 1994.

Mesic, Richard. Courses of action for enhancing U.S. Air Force "irregular warfare" capabilities: A functional solutions analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2010.

Ebeling, Charles. Enhanced methods for determining operational capabilities and support costs of proposed space systems: Final report. Dayton, Ohio: University of Dayton, Engineering Management and Systems Dept., 1993.

Aerospace Behavioral Engineering Technology Conference (4th 1985 Long Beach, Calif.). Fourth Aerospace Behavioral Engineering Technology Conference proceedings: "The human performance envelope, what are the operational capabilities?". Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1985.

National Research Council (U.S.). Committee for an Assessment of Naval Forces' Defense Capabilities Against Chemical and Biological Warfare Threats., ed. Naval forces' defense capabilities against chemical and biological warfare threats. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press, 2004.

Leed, Maren. Tough choices: Sustaining amphibious capabilities' contributions to strategic shaping. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2011.

Jackson, Jack A. An operational analysis for 2025: An application of value-focused thinking to future air and space capabilities. [Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala.]: AU Press, 1996.

1943-, Mesic Richard, ed. Courses of action for enhancing U.S. Air Force "irregular warfare" capabilities: A functional solutions analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2010.

Readiness, United States Congress Senate Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on. Military capabilities and readiness: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Readiness of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, March 21, 1995. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1996.

Readiness, United States Congress Senate Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on. Military capabilities and readiness: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Readiness of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, March 21, 1995. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1996.

The efforts of the military services in implementing joint experimentation: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Sixth Congress, first session, October 20, 1999. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2000.

1962-, Snyder Don, ed. Assessing capabilities and risks in Air Force programming: Framework, metrics, and methods. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2009.

Office, General Accounting. Military capabilities: Stronger joint staff role needed to enhance joint military training : report to Congressional requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1995.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services. Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities. U.S. military's capabilities to respond to domestic terrorist attacks involving the use of weapons of mass destruction: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, first session, May 1, 2001. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2002.

Office, General Accounting. Military capabilities: Focused attention needed to prepare U.S. forces for combat in urban areas : report to Congressional committees. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington, D.C. 20013): The Office, 2000.

Office, General Accounting. Air Force fighters: More reliance on Reserves increases the need to know their capabilities : report to Congressional committees. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1994.

Office, General Accounting. Nuclear weapons: Capabilities of DOE's limited life component program to meet operational needs : report to the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1997.

Office, General Accounting. Nuclear weapons: Capabilities of DOE's limited life component program to meet operational needs : report to the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1997.

Institutionalizing irregular warfare capabilities: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, first session, hearing held November 3, 2011. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2012.

Ensuring the climate record from the NPOESS and GOES-R spacecraft: Elements of a strategy to recover measurement capabilities lost in program restructuring. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press, 2008.

United States. Government Accountability Office. Defense transportation: Study limitations raise questions about the adequacy and completeness of the Mobility Capabilities Study and Report : report to congressional committees. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Accountability Office (441 G St. NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548), 2006.

Office, General Accounting. Contingency operations: Providing critical capabilities poses challenges : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington 20013): U.S. General Accounting Office, 2000.

Transportation, United States Congress House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime. Coast Guard mission capabilities: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, May 11, 2006. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2006.

The current and future roles, missions, and capabilities of U.S. military air power: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Airland of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, April 30, 2009. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2009.

Capabilities, United States Congress House Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and. Digital warriors: Improving military capabilities for cyber operations : hearing before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, second session, hearing held July 25, 2012. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013.

Gebicke, Mark E. Military readiness: Improved assessment measures are evolving : statement of Mark E. Gebicke, Director, Military Operations and Capabilities Issues, National Security and International Affairs Division, before the Subcommittee on Readiness, Committee on National Security, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1995.

P, Pisano Gary, and Upton David M. 1959-, eds. Strategic operations: Competing through capabilities. New York: Free Press, 1996.

Gebicke, Mark E. Military readiness: Improvements still needed in assessing military readiness : statement of Mark E. Gebicke, Director, Military Operations and Capabilities Issues, National Security and International Affairs Division, before the Subcommittee on Military Readiness, Committee on National Security, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1997.

Gebicke, Mark E. Military readiness: Congress needs better tools for effective oversight : statement of Mark E. Gebicke, Director, Military Operations and Capabilities Issues, National Security and International Affairs Division, before the Subcommittee on Military Readiness, Committee on National Security, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1998.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services. Subcommittee on Conventional Forces and Alliance Defense. Alliance and defense capabilities in Europe: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Conventional Forces and Alliance Defense of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, August 4; October 7, 20; November 3, 17, 1987. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1988.

Defense, United States Congress Senate Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Conventional Forces and Alliance. Alliance and defense capabilities in Europe: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Conventional Forces and Alliance Defense of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, August 4; October 7, 20; Novemeber 3, 17, 1987. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1988.

United States. General Accounting Office., ed. Military readiness: Observations on personnel readiness in later deploying Army divisions : statement of Mark E. Gebicke, Director, Military Operations and Capabilities Issues, National Security and International Affairs Division, before the Subcommittee[s] on Readiness and Military Personnel, Committee on National Security, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington, D.C. 20013): The Office, 1998.

Capabilities, United States Congress House Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and. The future of U.S. Special Operations Forces: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, second session, hearing held July 11, 2012. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2012.

Office, General Accounting. Strategic bombers: Adding conventional capabilities will be complex, time-consuming, and costly : report to the Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1993.

Closing the gap: Addressing critical rotary wing shortfalls for U.S. Special Operations Forces in fiscal year 2011 and beyond : hearing before the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Unconventional Threats, and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, second session, hearing held April 27, 2010. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2010.

Owen, Robert C. Airlift capabilities for future U.S. counterinsurgency operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp., 2007.

Malan, Mark. African capabilities for training for peace operations. Halfway House, S.A: Institute for Security Studies, 1997.

Office, General Accounting. Combating terrorism: Federal response teams provide varied capabilities : opportunities remain to improve coordination : report to Congressional requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 2000.

Intelligence, Emerging Threats and Capabilities United States Congress House Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on. Perspectives on the future national security environment: Technological, geopolitical, and economic trends affecting the defense strategic guidance: hearing before the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session, hearing held February 13, 2013. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013.

Understanding future irregular warfare challenges: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, second session, hearing held March 27, 2012. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2012.

Meyer, Arnoud de. Operations capabilities and strategic competencies: Transform and leverage. Fontainebleau: INSEAD, 1996.

C, Gompert David, ed. Underkill: Scalable capabilities for military operations amid populations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2009.

The future of U.S. Special Operations Forces: Ten years after 9/11 and twenty-five years after Goldwater-Nichols : hearing before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, first session, hearing held September 22, 2011. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2012.