Academic literature on the topic 'Organizational performance measuring'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Organizational performance measuring.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Organizational performance measuring"
Richard, Pierre J., Timothy M. Devinney, George S. Yip, and Gerry Johnson. "Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice." Journal of Management 35, no. 3 (February 6, 2009): 718–804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560.
Full textBates, Reid A. "Measuring Performance Improvement." Advances in Developing Human Resources 1, no. 1 (February 1999): 47–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152342239900100104.
Full textSingh, Satwinder, Tamer K. Darwish, and Kristina Potočnik. "Measuring Organizational Performance: A Case for Subjective Measures." British Journal of Management 27, no. 1 (November 8, 2015): 214–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12126.
Full textHubbard, Graham. "Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line." Business Strategy and the Environment 18, no. 3 (March 2009): 177–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.564.
Full textRalević, Predrag, Momčilo Dobrodolac, and Dragana Šarac. "Measuring the efficiency of organizational performance: A radial DEA approach." Tehnika 75, no. 6 (2020): 798–806. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/tehnika2006798r.
Full textPaliszkiewicz, Joanna, Alex Koohang, Jerzy Gołuchowski, and Jeretta Horn Nord. "Management trust, organizational trust, and organizational performance: advancing and measuring a theoretical model." Management and Production Engineering Review 5, no. 1 (March 1, 2014): 32–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/mper-2014-0005.
Full textMakhija, Parshotam, and Ashwani Goel. "Measuring organizational performance in Indian MSMEs: A qualitative study." Journal of Management Research and Analysis 6, no. 1 (April 15, 2019): 45–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2019.009.
Full textAntony, Job P., and Sanghamitra Bhattacharyya. "Measuring organizational performance and organizational excellence of SMEs – Part 1: a conceptual framework." Measuring Business Excellence 14, no. 2 (June 2010): 3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13683041011047812.
Full textSkoumalová, Eva, and Bohumil Minařík. "Methodology for determining influence of organizational culture to business performance." Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 55, no. 3 (2007): 123–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun200755030123.
Full textSchmidt, Pamela, Sharath Sasidharan, and Ronald Freeze. "Social Networks and Organizational Performance." International Journal of Knowledge Management 9, no. 3 (July 2013): 47–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijkm.2013070104.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Organizational performance measuring"
Mapolisa, Vuyani Welcome. "An analysis of the framework for measuring parliamentary performance in South Africa (2004-2009)." Thesis, University of Fort Hare, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10353/414.
Full textFontannaz, Suzanne Elizabeth. "Addressing the challenge of complexity with the development of the performance "ESP" conceptual framework to guide sustainable organisational development." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/793.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: A fundamental shift has occurred from the industrial age, traditional worldview to the knowledge age, emerging worldview. The implication of this shift is that organisations can no longer rely on an enduring competitive advantage for sustainable results. This raises questions about the relevance of the existing organisational performance approaches in addressing the challenge of complexity, particularly with regard to the validity and reliability of the established performance management frameworks. In the industrial age, financial measures were sufficient for measuring organisational performance. However, the emergence of the networked economy implies that a more composite measure is required, which reflects the diversity of stakeholder interests. The research confirms that, whilst there is no universal agreement in defining organisational performance, there is agreement that sustainable organisational performance is a combination of growth (social and economic measures) and profitability (financial measures). Further, the research confirms the existence of gaps, which undermine organisational performance. These gaps originate from the divergent approaches to organisational performance, which can be traced through the evolution of organisational development theory and management practice. Existing research studies collaborate the existence of these divergent approaches in determining organisational performance. These approaches include execution, strategy and people, representing the ‘ESP’ of organisational performance. Execution refers to a process based, micro perspective of organisational performance, whilst strategy and people refer to the systemic, macro approaches. In conditions of hyper-change, execution is considered to be the key determinant of organisational performance, whilst the traditional, strategy approach is found to be essential in addressing the challenge of complexity. The emergence of the networked economy implies that a more composite, people approach is required to address the challenges associated with increasing connectivity. The research proposition contends that an execution culture is necessary for addressing the challenge of complexity. This culture is dependent on the strategic fusion of the divergent strategy and people approaches and the existence of a strategic paradigm throughout the organisation. Organisational performance resides in an organisation’s ability to integrate the divergent approaches, to develop the necessary dynamic capabilities for sustainable organisational performance. The Performance ‘ESP’ framework reflects the integration of these approaches and provides a visual confirmation of the research proposition. The level of execution is determined by the existence of a strategic paradigm throughout the organisation, which is determined by individual performance, defined by the level of effectiveness, strength (individual) and partnership (‘ESP’). The development of a strategic paradigm is particularly relevant in the South African context, where historical factors have inhibited the level of empowerment within organisations. It is recommended that organisations apply the Performance ‘ESP’ index as a diagnostic tool to assess the existence of an execution culture to address the challenge of complexity. The purpose of the assessment tool is to complement the financial measures of performance, to ensure a balance between profitability and growth, to ensure sustainable organisational performance.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Daar het ‘n fundamentele verandering plaasgevind van die industriële tydperk en tradisionele wêreldbeskouiing na die kennistydperk en opkomende wêreldbeskouing. Die implikasie van hierdie verandering is dat organisasies nie meer kan staatmaak op ‘n deurlopende mededingende voordeel vir volhoubare resultate nie. Dit laat vrae ontstaan oor die toepaslikheid van die bestaande organisatoriese prestasiebenaderings om die uitdaging van kompleksiteit te hanteer, veral met betrekking tot die geldigheid en betroubaarheid van die bestaande prestasiebestuursraamwerke. Tydens die industriële tydperk was finansiële maatstawwe voldoende om organisasieprestasie te meet. Die opkoms van die netwerk-ekonomie impliseer egter dat ‘n meer saamgestelde maatstaf nodig is, wat die diversiteit van die belange van belanghebbers weerspieël. Die navorsing bevestig dat, hoewel daar geen universele ooreenkoms is in die definisie van organisasieprestasie nie, daar wel ooreenkoms is dat volhoubare organisasieprestasie ‘n kombinasie is van groei (sosiale en ekonomiese maatreëls) en winsgewendheid (finansiële maatreëls). Daarbenewens bevestig die navorsing die bestaan van gapings wat organisasieprestasie ondermyn. Hierdie gapings ontstaan uit die uiteenlopende benaderings tot organisasieprestasie, wat gevolg kan word deur die evolusie van organisasie-ontwikkelingsteorie en bestuurspraktyk. Bestaande navorsingstudies gebruik ‘n samestelling van hierdie uiteenlopende benaderings om organisasieprestasie te bepaal. Hierdie benaderings sluit in uitvoering, strategie en mense, wat in die Engelse afkorting die ‘ESP’ van organisasieprestasie verteenwoordig. Uitvoering verwys na ‘n prosesgebaseerde mikroperspektief van organisasieprestasie, terwyl strategie en mense verwys na die sistemiese makrobenaderings. In omstandighede van hiperverandering word uitvoering gesien as die sleutelbepaler van organisasieprestasie, terwyl die tradisionele strategiebenadering noodsaaklik is vir die hantering van die uitdaging van kompleksiteit. Die opkoms van die netwerk-ekonomie impliseer dat ‘n meer saamgestelde, mensbenadering nodig is om die uitdagings te hanteer wat saamgaan met groter onderlinge verbondenheid. Die navorsingsvoorstel se uitgangspunt is dat ‘n uitvoeringskultuur nodig is om die uitdaging van kompleksiteit te hanteer. Hierdie kultuur is afhanklik van die strategiese samesmelting van die uiteenlopende strategie- en mensbenaderings en die bestaan van ‘n strategiese paradigma dwarsdeur die organisasie. Organisasieprestasie hang af van ‘n organisasie se vermoë om die uiteenlopende benaderings te integreer en die nodige dinamiese bekwaamhede te ontwikkel vir volhoubare organisasieprestasie. Die prestasie- of ‘ESP’-raamwerk weerspieël die integrasie van hierdie benaderings en voorsien ‘n visuele bevestiging van die navorsingsvoorstel. Die vlak van uitvoering word bepaal deur die bestaan van ‘n strategiese paradigma dwarsdeur die organisasie, wat bepaal word deur individuele prestasie, gedefinieer deur die vlak van doeltreffendheid, sterkte (individueel) en vennootskap (‘ESP’). Die ontwikkeling van ‘n strategiese paradigma is veral toepaslik in die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks, waar historiese faktore die vlak van bemagtiging binne organisasies geïnhibeer het. Daar word aanbeveel dat organisasies die Prestasie ‘ESP’ Indeks toepas as ‘n diagnostiese instrument om die bestaan van ‘n uitvoerende kultuur te bepaal vir die hantering van die uitdaging van kompleksiteit. Die doel van die bepalingsinstrument is om die finansiële maatstawwe van prestasie aan te vul om sodoende ‘n balans tussen winsgewendheid en groei te verseker en dus volhoubare organisasieprestasie te verseker.
Van, der Westhuizen Adriana Isabella. "An assessment tool for measuring business process management as a core capability in an organization." Thesis, Pretoria : [s.n.], 2008. http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-11072008-160945/.
Full textSouza, Antonia Egidia de. "Indicadores de mensuração de desempenho em pequenas e médias empresas (PMEs): estudo no setor calçadista de Santa Catarina." Universidade de São Paulo, 2011. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/12/12139/tde-23112011-204230/.
Full textIn order to compete in a global market, besides formulating and implementing strategies, corporations need to adopt management tools to monitor and control the business performance and communicate their actions to their stakeholders. Facing that, in the last 20 years, researchers began to examine and propose performance measurement systems, considering the financial and non-financial parameters to assist managers implementing strategic planning, decision making, and actions controlling. However, it is surprising the small number of studies concerning Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) on that topic. It is known that SMEs have management and performance features that make them different from large companies; however one cannot neglect the important role of performance measurement systems for any kind of company, or type of management. Having that in mind, the intent of this thesis was to answer two important questions, namely: Do Small and Medium Enterprises employ indicators to measure performance? Do the organizational characteristics influence the use of indicators to measure performance? The main issues can be divided into the following questions: What kind of performance indicators are adopted by SMEs? Are the indicators financial or non-financial? What non-financial dimensions of performance measurement systems are implemented in SMEs? What are the motivations to use performance measures? Do companies that adopt people and practices strategic management, also adopt performance measurement system? In order to better understand these issues, a study and compilation of theoretical frameworks was carried out related to the performance measurement systems and the characteristics of SMEs. Following that, an applied field research with a non-probabilistic sample by convenience with 87 companies from the footwear industry in Santa Catarina was done. The chosen method was the quantitative one, for the data collection it was used the self-administered survey sent by the Internet and for the data analysis statistical techniques were applied (frequency, average, crossings and correlations\\associations) with the aid of SPSS. The results reveal that the companies surveyed have adopted financial and non-financial indicators, but the financial indicators are more used than the non-financial ones. Among non-financial, the most used are the processes followed by people. The least used are the social ones. The research indicates that there is a relationship between organizational practices and indicators employment. Companies using few management practices use fewer non-financial and financial indicators, and, companies that use more organizational practices tend to use a greater number of financial and non-financial indicators, and companies with a larger number of employees tend to employ more financial end non-financial indicators.
McElroy, Mark Wayne. "Social footprints measuring the social sustainability performance of organizations /." [S.l.] : [Groningen : [s.n.] ; University Library Groningen] [Host], 2008. http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/.
Full textEverhart, Chichi Kate. "Strategies for Measuring Quality Care in Healthcare Organizations in the United States." ScholarWorks, 2018. http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4851.
Full textCarton, Robert B. "Measuring organizational performance an exploratory study /." 2004. http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga%5Fetd/carton%5Frobert%5Fb%5F200405%5Fphd.
Full textSchwandt, Alexander [Verfasser]. "Measuring organizational complexity and its impact on organizational performance : a comprehensive conceptual model and empirical study / vorgelegt von Alexander Schwandt." 2009. http://d-nb.info/1000048349/34.
Full textCHANG, HUI-HUA, and 張慧華. "Measuring the Effects of E-Supply Chains: The Relationship between Platform Use and Organizational Performance." Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/473e5d.
Full text國立屏東大學
商業自動化與管理學系碩士班
106
With the development of technology and the uncertainty of dynamic environment, enterprises integrate the resources of suppliers and customers through electronic supply chain platform and deepen the engagement with supply chain. In this study, the subjects are the users of electronic supply chain platform of the three industries in Taiwan (electronics industry, automotive industry, and traditional industry). This study explores the influence between electronic supply chain platform usage, the absorptive capacity, and trading partner influence. Next, this study discusses the relationships between electronic supply chain platform usage, information sharing, supply chain integration and enterprise performance. With survey techniques, this study uses path analysis from Structural Equation Modeling to verify the study structure. The result of this study could be referred by academia and practitioners when implementing electronic supply chain platform.
Tsai, Yi-Ping, and 蔡益彬. "Measuring the Effect of Trust, Organizational Learning on Taiwan ICT Company's Innovation and Business Performance." Thesis, 2014. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/72072460790853054531.
Full text國立臺灣師範大學
國際人力資源發展研究所
102
Knowledge management is being acknowledged as an important issue since the advancement of technology and the globalization. In a highly competitive environment, the need to align business model with complex environments, and the need to satisfy sophisticated customers have led knowledge management as a key element of organizational design. Moreover, in the information communications technology (ICT) industry, knowledge management has been seen as a critical element to increase companies’ business performance. However, since the products and services of the ICT became a necessity for modern people, the competition to get profits has become heightened among an ICT industry. Besides, customers are captious increasingly, they compare everything to get the best one. Therefore, one way to improve ICT Company’s competitive advantage is knowledge management. Seeking to explain the knowledge management in the ICT industry, this research investigated the relations between trust, organizational learning, innovation, successful factors towards innovation, and business performance in the ICT industry. A TSLIP Model was created and analysed by using Partial Least Squares (PLS) method. The findings indicated that trust has a positive effect towards organizational learning; concern for employee plays an important role on trust. Organizational learning has a positive significant effect towards innovation; knowledge transfer and integrate has a biggest effect to organizational learning; the most important factor in successful factors is human-related factors; innovation indeed has a positive significant effect towards business performance in the ICT industry. Practical implications and suggestions were also proposed in order to improve the knowledge management and business performance for the ICT industry. Keywords: trust, organizational learning, innovation, business performance, ICT industry
Books on the topic "Organizational performance measuring"
Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
Find full textAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Measuring performance among state DOTs. Washington, D.C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2006.
Find full textChang, Richard Y. Measuring organizational improvement impact: A practical guide to successfully linking organizational improvement measures. Irvine, Calif: Richard Chang Associates, 1995.
Find full textChang, Richard Y. Performance scorecards: Measuring the right things in the real world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2000.
Find full textEckerson, Wayne W. Performance dashboards: Measuring, monitoring, and managing your business. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2010.
Find full textMeasuring performance: A toolkit of traditional and alternative methods. Farnham, Surrey: Gower Pub., 2012.
Find full textThe federal managers guide to measuring organizational performance / by Norman LaCharite.́. Huntsville, AL: FPMI Communications, 1998.
Find full textMeasuring the performance of public services: Principles and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Organizational performance measuring"
MacMillan, Jean, Frederick J. Diedrich, Elliot E. Entin, and Daniel Serfaty. "How Well Did It Work? Measuring Organizational Performance in Simulation Environments." In Organizational Simulation, 253–72. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471739448.ch9.
Full textAranzhin, Vyacheslav, and Ilia Dmitriev. "Analysis of the Problems of Measuring Organizational Performance in the Education, Public Administration and Commercial Sectors: Differences and General Principles." In Global Economics and Management: Transition to Economy 4.0, 209–23. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26284-6_19.
Full textWestphal, Ingo, Klaus-Dieter Thoben, and Marcus Seifert. "Measuring Collaboration Performance in Virtual Organizations." In Establishing the Foundation of Collaborative Networks, 33–42. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73798-0_4.
Full textDi Bitetto, Massimiliano. "Measuring the Performance of Research Organizations." In Public Management as Corporate Social Responsibility, 47–54. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07037-7_4.
Full textStone, Melissa M., and Susan Cutcher-Gershenfeld. "Challenges of Measuring Performance in Nonprofit Organizations." In Measuring the Impact of the Nonprofit Sector, 33–57. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0533-4_3.
Full textOzyirmidokuz, Esra Kahya, Kumru Uyar, and Eduard Alexandru Stoica. "Measuring Female Entrepreneurs’ Happiness from Online Feedback." In Organizations and Performance in a Complex World, 91–100. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50676-6_8.
Full textDiBernardino, Frank. "Measuring and Managing the Financial Performance of Human Capital Investments." In Why Human Capital is Important for Organizations, 109–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137410801_8.
Full textDalton, Thomas C., and Linda C. Dalton. "The Politics of Measuring Public Sector Performance: Productivity and the Public Organization." In Promoting Productivity in the Public Sector, 19–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08885-0_2.
Full textEberhardinger, Benedikt, Hella Ponsar, Dominik Klumpp, and Wolfgang Reif. "Measuring and Evaluating the Performance of Self-Organization Mechanisms Within Collective Adaptive Systems." In Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Distributed Systems, 202–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03424-5_14.
Full textBessler, Wolfgang, Julian Holler, and Martin Seim. "An Analysis of Alternative Methods for Measuring Long-Run Performance: An Application to Share Repurchase Announcements." In Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, 613–20. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10745-0_67.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Organizational performance measuring"
Papavramides, Thanos C., Pascal Aupee, and Jacob Yttesen. "Assessing project performance by measuring organizational impact." In 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC-Europe 2008). IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iemce.2008.4618028.
Full textPrihatini, Dewi, Wiji Utami, and Agus Priyono. "Performance Management Analysis: A Study of Measuring Business Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Jember Regency, Indonesia." In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Organizational Innovation (ICOI 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icoi-19.2019.63.
Full textSobhanallahi, Mohammad Ali, Abolfazl Gharaei, and Mohammad Pilbala. "Provide a practical approach for measuring the performance rate of organizational strategies." In 2016 12th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/induseng.2016.7519357.
Full textIrawan, Herry, Ratih Hendayani, and Dodie Tricahyono. "Measuring Organizational Performance of Small Medium Enterprise (SME) Printing Industry (Bandung, Jogjakarta, and Bali) using SCOR level 1 Opportunity Gap." In 3rd International Seminar and Conference on Learning Organization. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/isclo-15.2016.33.
Full textBagautdinova, Dr Prof Nailya, Dr Prof Ilshat Gafurov, Aida Novenkova, PhD, and Dr Prof Anna Svirina. "A Few Issues of Measuring Enterprise Management Performance The case of organizational culture and development of corporate social responsibility functions." In 4th Annual International Conference on Qualitative and Quantitative Economics Research (QQE 2014). Global Science & Technology Forum (GSTF), 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2251-2012_qqe14.17.
Full textMidovska Petkoska, Marija, Dragica Odzaklieska, and Spiro Lazaroski. "Designing an Integrated Framework for Measuring Organizational Performance in the Companies of the Food Industry in the Republic of North Macedonia." In 24th International Scientific Conference Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Economics in Subotica, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.46541/978-86-7233-380-0_52.
Full textĐurica, Maja, Marko Jovanović, Nina Đurica, and Miha Marič. "New Approaches to Measuring Enterprise Performance." In Organizations at Innovation and Digital Transformation Roundabout: Conference Proceedings. University of Maribor Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-388-3.11.
Full textSnow, Jr., Charles G., and Charles C. Snow. "Measuring business performance using indicators of ecologically sustainable organizations." In Intelligent Systems and Smart Manufacturing, edited by Surendra M. Gupta. SPIE, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.417266.
Full text"Performance Measures for the 21st Century [Abstract]." In InSITE 2018: Informing Science + IT Education Conferences: La Verne California. Informing Science Institute, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/4053.
Full textPeppa, Sofia. "The Importance of Measuring the Performance of IMO Member States." In SNAME 7th International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics. SNAME, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5957/some-2021-008.
Full textReports on the topic "Organizational performance measuring"
Nissen, Mark E. Measuring Dynamic Knowledge and Performance at the Tactical Edges of Organizations: Assessing Acquisition Workforce Quality. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada585024.
Full textNissen, Mark E. Toward an Operational Proxy for Acquisition Workforce Quality: Measuring Dynamic Knowledge and Performance at the Tactical Edges of Organizations. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada580594.
Full text